Abstract
Traditionally and in modern science, equanimity has been defined as both a practice and the resulting mental state cultivated by this practice. Equanimity is an inseparable component and a central mechanism of action and change in mindfulness practice; requiring exposure to neutral, pleasant, and unpleasant experiences while accepting the experience as it is and preventing the learned reaction (attachment or aversion) to it. Given the interdependence of mindfulness and equanimity, there has been a growing interest for constructing measurement tools to assess equanimity. In response, the Equanimity Scale (ES-16) was developed due to the lack of adequate measures. The development of the ES-16 commenced by identifying a pool of 517 theoretically appropriate items from 26 existing self-report measures of mindfulness and relevant constructs. Following an item selection process by three experienced meditators and teachers specialized in the development of equanimity, 42 items were endorsed as being sufficiently representing equanimity. These reflected two underlying dimensions of equanimity (experiential acceptance and non-reactivity). Studies examining exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses found two factors reflecting these dimensions and supported the reliability of the overall ES-16, and the dimensions of Experiential Acceptance and Non-Reactivity. Research using the ES-16 has provided evidence of concurrent validity through positive correlations with measures of related constructs, such as nonattachment, and negative correlations with measures of psychological distress. The ES-16 was also found to be appropriately sensitive to mental health improvements in clinical settings, where ES-16 scores increased in response to a mindfulness-based intervention, with concordant decreases in self-reported symptoms of anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anālayo, B. (2021). Relating equanimity to mindfulness. Mindfulness, 12(11), 2635–2644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01671-z
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: The kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029
Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504
Belzer, F., Schmidt, S., Lucius-Hoene, G., Schneider, J. F., Claudia L. Orellana-Rios, C. L., & Sauer, S. (2013). Challenging the construct validity of mindfulness assessment–a cognitive interview study of the freiburg mindfulness inventory. Mindfulness, 4, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0165-7
Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). Measuring mindfulness: First steps towards the development of a comprehensive mindfulness scale. Mindfulness, 4, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0102-9
Bodhi, B. (2000). A comprehensive manual of Abhidhamma: The philosophical psychology of Buddhism. Pariyatti Publishing.
Bodhi, B. (2005). In the Buddha’s words: An anthology of discourses from the Pali Canon. Wisdom Publications.
Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848.
Buchheld, N., Grossman, P., & Walach, H. (2001). Measuring mindfulness in insight meditation (Vipassana) and meditation-based psychotherapy: The development of the Freiburg mindfulness inventory (FMI). Journal of Meditation and Meditation Research, 1, 5–23.
Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191107311467
Cayoun, B. A. (2011). Mindfulness-integrated CBT: Principles and practice. Wiley.
Cayoun, B. A., & Shires, A. G. (2020). Co-emergence reinforcement and its relevance to interoceptive desensitization in mindfulness and therapies aiming at transdiagnostic efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 545945. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.545945
Cayoun, B. A., Francis, S. E., & Shires, A. G. (2019). The clinical handbook of mindfulness-integrated cognitive behavior therapy: A step-by-step guide for therapists. Wiley.
Cayoun, B. A., Elphinstone, B., Kasselis, N., Glenn Bilsborrow, G., & Skilbeck, C. (2022). Validation and factor structure of the mindfulness-based self efficacy scale-revised. Mindfulness, 13, 751–765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-022-01834-6
Chadwick, P., Hember, M., Symes, J., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., & Dagnan, D. (2008). Responding mindfully to unpleasant thoughts and images: Reliability and validity of the Southampton mindfulness questionnaire (SMQ). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47(4), 451–455.
Chah, A. (2007). The teachings of Ajahn Chah: A collection of Ajahn Chah’s Dhamma talks. pdf and html versions. Available at www.ajahnchah.org.
Cheever, J., Cayoun, B. A., Elphinstone, B., & Shires, A. G. (2021). Confirmation and validation of the equanimity scale-16 [Manuscript in preparation]. Graduate School of Health, University of Technology.
Desbordes, G., Gard, T., Hoge, E. A., Hölzel, B. K., Kerr, C., Lazar, S. W., Olendzki, A., & Vago, D. R. (2015). Moving beyond mindfulness: Defining equanimity as an outcome measure in meditation and contemplative research. Mindfulness, 6(2), 356–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0269-8
Dyer, A., & Cayoun, B. A. (2012). Item development and expert peer review of the multidimensional mindfulness inventory. Unpublished thesis. University of Tasmania, Australia.
Eberth, J., Sedlmeier, P., & Schafer, T. (2019). PROMISE: a model of insight and equanimity as the key effects of mindfulness meditation. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2389. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02389
Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8
Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T., van Dulmen, M. H. M., Segal, Z. V., Ma, S. H., Teasdale, J. D., & Williams, J. M. G. (2007). Initial psychometric properties of the experiences questionnaire: Validation of a self-report measure of decentering. Behavior Therapy, 38(3), 234–246.
Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. In Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
Grossman, P. (2011). Defining mindfulness by how poorly I think I pay attention during everyday awareness and other intractable problems for psychology’s (re)invention of mindfulness: Comment on Brown et al. (2011). Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022713
Gu, J., Strauss, C., Bond, R., & Cavanagh, K. (2015). How do mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and mindfulness-based stress reduction improve mental health and wellbeing? A systematic review and meta-analysis of mediation studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 37, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.01.006
Hadash, Y., Segev, N., Tanay, G., Goldstein, P., & Bernstein, A. (2016). The decoupling model of equanimity: Theory, measurement, and test in a mindfulness intervention. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1214–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0564-2
Hart, W. (1987). The art of living: Vipassana meditation as taught by S. N. Goenka. Harper & Row.
Juneau, C., Pellerin, N., Elliott, T., Ricard, M., Shankland, R., & Dambrun, M. (2020). Reliability and validity of an equanimity questionnaire: The two-factor equanimity scale (EQUA-S). PeerJ, 8(e9405), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9405
Juneau, C., Shankland, R., Knäuper, B., & Dambrun, M. (2021). Mindfulness and equanimity moderate approach/avoidance motor responses. Cognition and Emotion, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2021.1927674
Kohn, P. M., O’brien-Wood, C., Pickering, D. I., & Decicco, T. L. (2003). The personal functioning inventory: A reliable and valid measure of adaptiveness in coping. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 35(2), 111–123.
Krägeloh, C. U., Bergomi, C., Siegert, R. J., & Medvedev, O. N. (2018). Response shift after a mindfulness-based intervention: Measurement invariance testing of the comprehensive inventory of mindfulness experiences. Mindfulness, 9, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0764-4
Kraus, S., & Sears, S. (2009). Measuring the immeasurables: Development and initial validation of the self-other four immeasurables (SOFI) scale based on Buddhist teachings on loving kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Social Indicators Research, 92(1), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-008-9300-1
Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467.
Leigh, J., Bowen, S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2005). Spirituality, mindfulness and substance abuse. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1335–1341.
Lindsay, E., Young, S., Smyth, J., Brown, K., & Creswell, D. (2018). Acceptance lowers stress reactivity: Dismantling mindfulness training in a randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 87, 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.09.015
Lundman, B., Strandberg, G., Eisemann, M., Gustafson, Y., & Brulin, C. (2007). Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the resilience scale. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 21(2), 229–237.
Mack, J. W., Nilsson, M., Balboni, T., Friedlander, R. J., Block, S. D., Trice, E., et al. (2008). Peace, Equanimity, and Acceptance in the cancer experience (PEACE) Validation of a scale to assess acceptance and struggle with terminal illness. 112(11), 2509–2517. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23476
Mahāsi, S. (1994). The progress of insight: A treatise on satipatthāna meditation. Trans. Ñānaponika. 1965. Reprint. Buddhist Publication Society.
Mehling, W., Price, C., Daubenmier, J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 7(11).
Nyanamoli, B. (trans.) (2011). The path of purification, Visuddhimagga. Buddhist Publication Society .
Osborne, S., Williams, E., Cayoun, B. A., & Shires, A. G. (2021). Response-shift bias and clinical responsiveness of the equanimity scale-16 following the mindfulness-integrated CBT program [Manuscript in preparation]. Graduate School of Health, University of Technology.
Pa-Auk, S. (2019). Knowing and seeing (5th ed.). WAVE Publications.
Pirson, M. A., & Langer, E. (2015). Developing the langer mindfulness scale. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015(1), 11308.
Rogers, H. T., Shires, A. G., & Cayoun, B. A. (2021). Development and validation of the equanimity scale-16. Mindfulness, 12, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01503-6
Sahdra, B. K., Shaver, P. R., & Brown, K. W. (2010). A scale to measure nonattachment: A Buddhist complement to western research on attachment and adaptive functioning. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890903425960
Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., & Kohls, N. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: Review on state of the art. Mindfulness, 4(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0122-5
Sharpe, J. P., & Gilbert, D. G. (1998). Effects of repeated administration of the Beck depression inventory and other measures of negative mood states. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(4), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00193-1
Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013). State mindfulness scale (SMS): Development and initial validation. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1286–1299.
Thanissaro, B. (1997). Lokavipatti Sutta: The failings of the world (AN 8.6), translated from the Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Access to insight (BCBS edition). http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/an/an08/an08.006.than.html .
Walshe, M. (2012). The long discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Digha Nikaya. Wisdom Publications.
Weber, J. (2017). Mindfulness is not enough: Why equanimity holds the key to compassion. Mindfulness & Compassion, 2(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mincom.2017.09.004
Weber, J. (2021). A systematic literature review of equanimity in mindfulness based interventions. Pastoral Psychology, 70, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11089-021-00945-6
Weber, J., & Lowe, M. (2018). Development and validation of the equanimity barriers scale [EBS]. Current Psychology, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9969-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Equanimity Scale | |
---|---|
Select the response that best describes how you view yourself, based on the scale below. Select the appropriate responses based on how much you agree with each statement right at this moment. Try not to spend too much time of any one item. There are no right or wrong answers. • Strongly disagree = 1 • Mildly disagree = 2 • Agree and disagree equally = 3 • Mildly agree = 4 • Strongly agree = 5 | |
1. When I have distressing thoughts or images, I am able just to notice them without reacting. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
2. I approach each experience by trying to accept it, no matter whether it is pleasant or unpleasant. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
3. When I experience distressing thoughts and images, I am able to accept the experience. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
4. I can pay attention to what is happening in my body without disliking or wanting more of the feeling or sensation. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
5. When I notice my feelings, I have to act on them immediately. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
6. If I notice an unpleasant body sensation, I tend to worry about it. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
7. When I feel physical discomfort, I can’t relax because I am never sure it will pass. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
8. I perceive my feelings and emotions without having to react to them. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
9. I remain present with sensations and feelings even when they are unpleasant. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
10. I notice that I need to react to whatever pops into my head. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
11. When I have distressing thoughts or images, I “step back” and am aware of the thought or image without getting taken over by it. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
12. I can’t keep my mind calm and clear, especially when I feel upset or physically uncomfortable. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
13. I endeavor to cultivate calm and peace within me, even when everything appears to be constantly changing. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
14. I am impatient and can’t stop my reactivity when faced with other people’s emotions and actions. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
15. I am not able to tolerate discomfort. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
16. I am not able to prevent my reaction when someone is unpleasant. | 1 2 3 4 5 |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Cayoun, B.A., Elphinstone, B., Shires, A.G. (2022). The Equanimity Scale-16. In: Medvedev, O.N., Krägeloh, C.U., Siegert, R.J., Singh, N.N. (eds) Handbook of Assessment in Mindfulness Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_57-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77644-2_57-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77644-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77644-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences