Skip to main content

Personalised Prevention: Increasing or Decreasing Over-Medicalisation , Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment ?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personalized Medicine in the Making

Part of the book series: Human Perspectives in Health Sciences and Technology ((HPHST,volume 3))

Abstract

The development of personalised prevention has been followed by rising concerns over over-medicalisation, overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Indeed, it has been said to lead to the discovery of a multitude of small abnormalities of low significance and low predictive validity. Complex diseases are now detected in their earliest stages, even though they might never have negatively impacted a person’s quality of life or lifespan. In such cases, the harm caused to these persons cannot be overlooked. This chapter aims to explore the mechanisms through which personalised prevention could perhaps be used to de-escalate these issues. First, its development takes place in a context where issues of over-medicalisation, overdiagnosis and overtreatment are already prevalent in preventive medicine, meaning that personalisation might potentially be used to reduce the number of people to whom screening and preventive measures are proposed. Secondly, the process of risk stratification encouraged by personalisation offers a more nuanced understanding of risk – from very low to very high – thus enabling de-escalation measures for newly diagnosed people. Lastly, the more radical impact that personalisation and risk stratification could have on nosologies themselves might encourage the implementation of preventive measures that ensure that identified at-risk individuals have access to needed forms of public support. Woven into the development of this chapter is the notion that personalised prevention can bring forth more complex conceptualisations of people’s vulnerability to disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Primary prevention encompasses all interventions before health problems might even start to occur. Secondary prevention designates measures of early detection and interventions, in the very first stages of an illness and before the onset of severe signs and symptoms. Tertiary prevention, on the other hand, covers the management of illness post diagnosis in order to slow down or stop its progression, or potential complications – as such, it is integrated within medical care rather than public health.

  2. 2.

    Multiscale modeling of risks, here, refers to attempts (in systems medicine, for example) to predict the problematic behaviour of diverse biological and/or other systems through their interactions at multiple scales. It can therefore be used in attempts to solve problems which have important features at multiple scales of time and/or space (e.g., tissues and organs, as well as molecular biomarkers).

  3. 3.

    While the predictive validity of some markers has been established – for example, between 55 and 65% of women who present the BRCA1 genetic mutation will develop breast cancer by the age of 70 years, and 45% of women who inherit the BRCA2 mutation will develop breast cancer by 70 years (Ramaswami et al. 2018) – there are a great many cases where predictive validity remains much too low to be of clinical use – in psychiatry, for example, “so far no biomarkers [...] or other risk markers are available to create profiles to enhance prediction and therapeutic selection in psychiatry. Stratified or personalized interventions remain aspirational, yet potentially within reach” (McGorry et al. 2014).

  4. 4.

    The PSA test is a blood test used primarily to screen for prostate cancer. The test measures the amount of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the blood.

  5. 5.

    Referring to Boorse’s distinction between disease, meaning the malfunctioning of biological systems, and illness, referring to the deterioration of one’s well-being (Boorse 1975).

  6. 6.

    Meaning that there is evidence of rapid progression.

  7. 7.

    E.g., Binet stage A, Rai stages 0-II.

  8. 8.

    The CLL-IPI uses a weighted grading of five independent prognostic factors: TP53 deletion and/or mutation (collectively called TP53 dysfunction), immunoglobulin heavy chain variable (IGHV) mutational status, serum β2-microglobulin, clinical stage, and age (Hallek 2019): “One very important value of the CLL-IPI also lies in the fact that it identifies – more accurately than the clinical staging – CLL patients without need of therapy. Patients with a low risk CLL-IPI (0–1) and asymptomatic disease do not require treatment” (Ibid., 2019).

  9. 9.

    Positive symptoms, in psychiatry, are understood as symptoms which bring about new phenomena, such as hallucinations, delusions, etc., while negative symptoms point to the loss of capacities, like apathy, speech difficulties or social and emotional withdrawal.

  10. 10.

    The prevalence of schizophrenia, for example, is generally said to be around 1% in the general population; but “in early studies [...], the risk of developing a psychotic disorder increased from the expected rate of approximately 10% in family high-risk groups to approximately 30% to 50% in clinical high-risk samples followed for one to two years” (Addington and Heinssen 2012). Ethical debates surrounding the benefits/risks ratio of pre-emptive psychiatry have been fierce, balancing the possibility of over-medicalisation , overdiagnosis, overtreatment , stigmatisation, and injustice against that of being able to prevent the development of a particularly harmful disorder.

  11. 11.

    The prodrome of a disease encompasses early signs or symptoms before more diagnostically specific signs and symptoms develop.

  12. 12.

    Prevention programmes, in principle, can follow three different approaches – universal, selective and/or indicated. Each reflects segments of the population as well as levels of risk. A universal prevention targets the general population unspecifically as a whole; a selective prevention approach aims at a segment of the population which is clinically healthy, but at a high risk for the disease (e.g., because of a genetic liability); indicated prevention targets persons who already show clinical signs and are possibly in a prodromal state.

References

  • Addington, Jean, and Robert Heinssen. 2012. Prediction and prevention of psychosis in youth at clinical high risk. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 8: 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, Partha, Antonio Ponti, Ahti Anttila, Guglielmo Ronco, Carlo Senore, Diama Bhadra Vale, Nereo Segnan, Mariano Tomatis, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Maja Primic Žakelj, Joakim Dillner, Klara Miriam Elfström, Stefan Lönnberg, and Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan. 2018. Status of implementation and organization of cancer screening in the European Union member states – Summary results from the second European screening report. International Journal of Cancer 142 (1): 44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhui, Kamaldeep, and Sokratis Dinos. 2011. Preventive psychiatry: A paradigm to improve population mental health and well-being. The British Journal of Psychiatry 198 (6): 417–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binet, Jacques-Louis, Federico Caligaris-Cappio, Daniel Catovsky, Bruce Cheson, Tom Davis, Guillaume Dighiero, Hartmut Döhner, Michael Hallek, Peter Hillmen, Michael Keating, Emili Montserrat, Thomas J. Kipps, Kanti Rai, and International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (IWCLL). 2006. Perspectives on the use of new diagnostic tools in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 107 (3): 859–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal-Barby, Jennifer S. 2014. Psychiatry’s new manual (DSM-5): Ethical and conceptual dimensions. Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (8): 531–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, Christopher. 1975. On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy & Public Affairs 5 (1): 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, William T. 2009. Anticipating DSM-V: Should psychosis risk become a diagnostic class? Schizophrenia Bulletin 35 (5): 841–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, Cheryl, Dolores Malaspina, and Laura Hercher. 2005. Prodromal interventions for schizophrenia vulnerability: The risks of being “at risk”. Schizophrenia Research 73 (2–3): 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalvie, Shareefa, Nastassja Koen, Nathaniel McGregor, Kevin O'Connell, Louise Warnich, Raj Ramesar, Caroline M. Nievergelt, and Dan J. Stein. 2016. Toward a global roadmap for precision medicine in psychiatry: Challenges and opportunities. OMICS 20 (10): 557–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaloge, Suzette, Thomas Bachelot, François-Clément Bidard, Marc Espie, Etienne Brain, Hervé Bonnefoi, Joseph Gligorov, Florence Dalenc, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard, David Azria, Jean-Philippe Jacquin, Jérôme Lemonnier, William Jacot, Anthony Goncalves, Charles Coutant, Gérard Ganem, Thierry Petit, Frédérique Penault-Lorca, Marc Debled, Mario Campone, Christelle Levy, Bruno Coudert, Alain Lortholary, Laurence Venat-Bouvet, Julien Grenier, Hugues Bourgeois, Bernard Asselain, Johanna Arvis, Martine Castro, Anne Tardivon, David G. Cox, Patrick Arveux, Corinne Balleyguier, Fabrice André, Roman Rouzier, and Intergroupe national de recherche sur le cancer du sein Unicancer (UCBG). 2016. Dépistage du cancer du sein: En route vers le futur. Bulletin du Cancer 103 (9): 753–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esserman, Laura J., and Murali Varma. 2019. Should we rename low risk cancers? BMJ 364: k4699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esserman, Laura J., Ian M. Thompson, Brian Reid, Peter Nelson, David F. Ransohoff, H. Gilbert Welch, Shelley Hwang, Donald A. Berry, Kenneth W. Kinzler, William C. Black, Mina Bissell, Howard Parnes, and Sudhir Srivastava. 2014. Addressing overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: A prescription for change. The Lancet Oncology 15 (6): e234–e242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firth, Joseph, Rebekah Carney, Rebecca Elliott, Paul French, Sophie Parker, Rebecca McIntyre, Jamie S. McPhee, and Alison R. Yung. 2018. Exercise as an intervention for first-episode psychosis: A feasibility study. Early Intervention in Psychiatry 12 (3): 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Renee D. 2003. Association between physical activity and mental disorders among adults in the United States. Preventive Medicine 36 (6): 698–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Sara, and Henrik Vogt. 2016. Personalizing medicine: Disease prevention in silico and in socio. Humana Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies 30: 105–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guchet, Xavier. 2014. Le patient « actionnable » de la médecine personnalisée. Socio-Anthropologie 29: 37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyawali, Bishal. 2017. Point: The imprecise pursuit of precision medicine: Are biomarkers to blame? Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 15 (7): 859–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Stephan F., Jonathan Irish, Patti Groome, and Rebecca Griffiths. 2014. Access, excess, and overdiagnosis: The case for thyroid cancer. Cancer Medicine 3 (1): 154–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallek, Michael. 2019. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. American Journal of Hematology 94 (11): 1266–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallek, Michael, Bruce D. Cheson, Daniel Catovsky, Federico Caligaris-Cappio, Guillaume Dighiero, Hartmut Döhner, Peter Hillmen, Michael J. Keating, Emili Montserrat, Kanti R. Rai, Thomas J. Kipps, and International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. 2008. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A report from the international workshop on chronic lymphocytic leukemia updating the National Cancer Institute-working group 1996 guidelines. Blood 111 (12): 5446–5456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hey, Spencer Phillips, and Brianna Barsanti-Innes. 2016. Epistemology, ethics, and progress in precision medicine. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59 (3): 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickie, Ian B., Jan Scott, and Patrick D. McGorry. 2013. Clinical staging for mental disorders: A new development in diagnostic practice in mental health. Medical Journal of Australia 198 (9): 461–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Allen S., Louise Davies, Iain J. Nixon, Frank L. Palmer, Laura Y. Wang, Snehal G. Patel, Ian Ganly, Richard J. Wong, R. Michael Tuttle, and Luc G.T. Morris. 2015. Increasing diagnosis of subclinical thyroid cancers leads to spurious improvements in survival rates. Cancer 121 (11): 1793–1799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, Allen S., Timothy J. Daskivich, Wendy L. Sacks, and Zachary S. Zumsteg. 2019. Parallels between low-risk prostate cancer and thyroid Cancer: A review. JAMA Oncology 5 (4): 556–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, Yasuhiro, Takashi Uruno, Keiichi Nakano, Yuuki Takamura, Akihiro Miya, Kaoru Kobayashi, Tamotsu Yokozawa, Fumio Matsuzuka, Seiji Kuma, Kanji Kuma, and Akira Miyauchi. 2003. An observation trial without surgical treatment in patients with papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid. Thyroid 13 (4): 381–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacklyn, Gemma, Kevin McGeechan, Nehmat Houssami, Katy Bell, Paul P. Glasziou, and Alexandra Barratt. 2018. Overdiagnosis due to screening mammography for women aged 40 years and over. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013076.

  • Jaffee, Elizabeth M., Chi Van Dang, David B. Agus, Brian M. Alexander, Kenneth C. Anderson, Alan Ashworth, Anna D. Barker, Roshan Bastani, Sangeeta Bhatia, Jeffrey A. Bluestone, Otis Brawley, Atul J. Butte, Daniel G. Coit, Nancy E. Davidson, Mark Davis, Ronald A. DePinho, Robert B. Diasio, Draetta Giulio, A. Lindsay Frazier, Andrew Futreal, Sam S. Gambhir, Patricia A. Ganz, Levi Garraway, Stanton Gerson, Sumit Gupta, James Heath, Ruth I. Hoffman, Cliff Hudis, Chanita Hughes-Halbert, Ramy Ibrahim, Hossein Jadvar, Brian Kavanagh, Rick Kittles, Quynh-Thu Le, Scott M. Lippman, David Mankoff, Elaine R. Mardis, Deborah K. Mayer, Kelly McMasters, Neal J. Meropol, Beverly Mitchell, Peter Naredi, Dean Ornish, Timothy M. Pawlik, Jeffrey Peppercorn, Martin G. Pomper, Derek Raghavan, Christine Ritchie, Sally W. Schwarz, Richard Sullivan, Richard Wahl, Jedd D. Wolchok, Sandra L. Wong, and Alfred Yung. 2017. Future cancer research priorities in the USA: A lancet oncology commission. The Lancet Oncology 18 (11): e653–e706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterkötter, Joachim. 2016. Early detection of psychosis – State of the art and future perspectives. In Early detection and intervention in psychosis: State of the art and future perspectives, ed. Anita Riecher-Rössler and Patrick D. McGorry, 1–14. Basel: Karger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovatch, Kevin J., Connor Hoban, and Andrew G. Shuman. 2018. Thyroid cancer surgery guidelines in an era of de-escalation. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 44 (3): 297–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, Patrick D. 2007. Issues for DSM-V: Clinical staging: A heuristic pathway to valid nosology and safer, more effective treatment in psychiatry. The American Journal of Psychiatry 164 (6): 859–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGorry, Patrick D., Matcheri Keshavan, Sherilyn Goldstone, Paul Amminger, Kelly Allott, Michael Berk, Suzie Lavoie, Christos Pantelis, Alison Yung, Stephen Wood, and Ian Hickie. 2014. Biomarkers and clinical staging in psychiatry. World Psychiatry 13 (3): 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan, Ray, Jenny Doust, and David Henry. 2012. Preventing overdiagnosis: How to stop harming the healthy. BMJ 344: e3502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller-Spahn, Franz. 2008. Individualized preventive psychiatry: Syndrome and vulnerability diagnostics. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 258 (Suppl 5): 92–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Wynne E., and David A. Chambers. 2020. Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions. Implementation Science 15 (1): 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Wynne E., David A. Chambers, and Barnett S. Kramer. 2019. Conceptualizing de-implementation in cancer care delivery. Journal of Clinical Oncology 37 (2): 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, Ana Carla, Alberto Fernández de Sevilla, Alicia Domingo, Esmeralda De La Banda, Eva Domingo Domènech, Santiago Mercadal, Neus Ruiz-Xivillé, Esther Alonso, Maite Encuentra, and Eva González Barca. 2015. Prospective study of prognostic factors in asymptomatic patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia-like lymphocytosis: The cut-off of 11 × 10(9)/L monoclonal lymphocytes better identifies subgroups with different outcomes. Annals of Hematology 94 (4): 627–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Amy, and Christopher Etherton-Beer. 2019. Undiagnosing to prevent overprescribing. Maturitas 123: 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, Jo C., Bruce G. Link, and Parisa Tehranifar. 2010. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. Journal of Health and Social Behavior 51 (Suppl): S28–S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponti, Antonio, Partha Basu, David Ritchie, Ahti Anttila, Andre L. Carvalho, Carlo Senore, Meritxell Mallafré-Larrosa, Cristiano Piccinelli, Guglielmo Ronco, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Maja Primic-Žakelj, Joakim Dillner, Miriam K. Elfström, Stefan Lönnberg, Diama B. Vale, Mariano Tomatis, Paola Armaroli, Livia Giordano, Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan, Nereo Segnan. 2020. Key issues that need to be considered while revising the current annex of the European Council Recommendation (2003) on cancer screening. International Journal of Cancer 147: 9-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswami, Ramya, Ronald Bayer, and Sandro Galea. 2018. Precision medicine from a public health perspective. Annual Review of Public Health 39: 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Wendy. 2014. Vulnerability and bioethics. In Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy, ed. Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers, and Susan Dodds, 60–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Wendy, Catriona Mackenzie, and Susan Dodds. 2012. Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 05 (2): 11–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Innes, Caryn, Hamza Chetteouh, Achilleas Achilleos, Nuria Galeano-Dalmau, Irene Debiram-Beecham, Shona MacRae, Petros Fessas, Elaine Walkerm Suby Varghese, Theodore Evan, Pierre S. Lao-Sirieix, Maria O’Donovan, Shalini Malhotra, Marco Novelli, Babett Disep, Phillip V. Kaye, Laurence B. Lovat, Rehan Haidry, Michael Griffin, Krish Ragunath, Predeep Bhandari, Adam Haycock, Danielle Morris, Stephen Attwood, Anjan Dhar, Colin Rees, Matt D. Rutter, Richard Ostler, Benoit Aigret, Peter D. Sasieni, and Rebecca Fitzgerald. 2017. Risk stratification of Barrett’s oesophagus using a non-endoscopic sampling method coupled with a biomarker panel: A cohort study. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2 (1): 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, Fumiaki, Zhe Jin, Karsten Schulmann, Jean Wang, Bruce D. Greenwald, Tetsuo Ito, Takatsugu Kan, James P. Hamilton, Jian Yang, Bogdan Paun, Stefan David, Alexandru Olaru, Yulan Cheng, Yuriko Mori, John M. Abraham, Harris G. Yfantis, Tsung-Teh Wu, Mary B. Fredericksen, Kenneth K. Wang, Marcia Canto, Yvonne Romero, Ziding Feng, and Stephen J. Meltzer. 2008. Three-tiered risk stratification model to predict progression in Barrett’s esophagus using epigenetic and clinical features. PLoS One 3 (4): e1890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharl, Arno, Thorsten Kühn, Thomas Papathemelis, and Annette Salterberg. 2015. The right treatment for the right patient – Personalised treatment of breast cancer. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 75 (7): 683–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strati, Paolo, and Tait D. Shanafelt. 2015. Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and early-stage chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Diagnosis, natural history, and risk stratification. Blood 126 (4): 454–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studerus, Eric, Martina Papmeyer, and Anita Riecher-Rössler. 2016. Neurocognition and motor functioning in the prediction of psychosis. In Early detection and intervention in psychosis: State of the art and future perspectives, ed. Anita Riecher-Rössler and Patrick D. McGorry, 116–132. Basel: Karger.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, Henrik, Bjørn Hofmann, and Linn Getz. 2016. The new holism: P4 systems medicine and the medicalization of health and life itself. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 19 (2): 307–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, Henrik, Sara Green, and John Brodersen. 2018. Precision medicine in the clouds. Nature Biotechnology 36 (8): 678–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, Henrik, Sara Green, Claus Thorn Ekstrøm, and John Brodersen. 2019. How precision medicine and screening with big data could increase overdiagnosis. BMJ 366. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5270.

  • Welch, H. Gilbert, and William C. Black. 2010. Overdiagnosis in cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 102 (9): 605–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2002. National cancer control programmes: Policies and managerial guidelines. https://www.who.int/cancer/publications/nccp2002/en/. Accessed 15 June 2020.

  • World Health Organization – Regional Office for Europe. 2017. Screening and early detection. http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/noncommunicable-diseases/cancer/policy/screening-and-early-detection. Accessed 02 Feb 2020.

  • Wright, Alan F., and Nicholas D. Hastie. 2001. Complex genetic diseases: Controversy over the Croesus code. Genome Biology 2 (8). https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2001-2-8-comment2007.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Tinland .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tinland, J. (2022). Personalised Prevention: Increasing or Decreasing Over-Medicalisation , Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment ?. In: Beneduce, C., Bertolaso, M. (eds) Personalized Medicine in the Making. Human Perspectives in Health Sciences and Technology, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74804-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics