Abstract
Pine forests represent a significant proportion of the vegetation of the Mediterranean Basin. Their abundance is explained in part by the importance they always have had for humans and the wide range of ecosystem services they provide. Pine forests and plantations are responsible for important provisioning services such as timber and firewood, but are rich in non-wood forest products, among which resin, pine nuts and edible mushrooms are the most outstanding examples. Of similar importance are the regulating services that pine woodlands provide. Erosion control and hydrological regulation have been the main reasons behind the establishment of many pine plantations throughout the Mediterranean Basin. Other regulating services of pine forests are their role in the carbon cycle, with pine stands representing a large fraction of carbon stocks in the Mediterranean region, and their importance as habitats for multiple, sometimes endangered, species. Pine forests also provide cultural services since pines are, esthetically, an iconic element in Mediterranean landscapes. Pine forests are enjoyed for multiple recreation and scientific activities. However, these ecosystem services are at risk of deterioration by several, and sometimes synergic, threats. Pine forests are very prone to fire, and though highly resilient to it, many services associated with pine forests disappear in the short- or long term following fire. Increasing temperatures and drought affect the recruitment, growth and survival of pines, increase fire risk and favor the expansion of pests and diseases.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Pines are a key element in forests and other woodland areas across the Mediterranean region. Pines form many natural pure and mixed stands, but have also been planted in many areas inside and outside their native ranges, significantly increasing their original representation in Mediterranean landscapes. They have been widely used in reforestation projects for soil protection and hydrological purposes due to their rapid growth, tolerance to poor soils and summer drought, and easy cultivation in nurseries (Fady et al. 2003; Burylo et al. 2012; Enescu et al. 2016; Mauri et al. 2016). Furthermore, they provide economically valuable forest products such as timber and firewood, resin and pine nuts, giving justification for their maintenance, management and expansion.
The multi-purpose usefulness that promoted the expansion of pines by humans falls nowadays within the broad term of ecosystem services, conceived as the direct and indirect contributions of ecosystems to human well-being (Montes et al. 2011). Several classifications have been proposed for ecosystem services according to different criteria (Burkhard and Maes 2017), but the categorization used by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) comprises provisioning (i.e., something that can be exploited), regulating (e.g., protection from erosion) and cultural services is widely used. The ecological processes that underpin these three groups of services are considered a fourth type in the Millennium Assessment, named supporting services, but more recent assessments omit this category (Montes et al. 2011). Pine forests provide all these groups of services, which depend on their persistence and proper functioning. However, these services may be put at risk by threats to pine forests such as wildfires, land-use change or diseases; the onset of global change has enhanced them and also generated other new threats.
This chapter addresses the ecosystem services provided by natural and planted pine forests across the Mediterranean Basin and addresses the main threats to pine forest maintenance and provisioning of ecosystem services.
2 Ecosystem Services Provided by Pine Forests
2.1 Provisioning Services
Pine forests and plantations provide multiple provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services. Wood production has traditionally been the main service responsible for the management, plantation and resulting expansion of pine forests (Masiero et al. 2016; FAO and Plan Bleu 2018). In the Mediterranean region, conifers represent 41% of the total growing stock (FAO and Plan Bleu 2018). The main product from most pines in the Mediterranean region is timber, with prevalence of Pinus sylvestris L., P. nigra J.F.Arn and P. pinaster Ait. (Durrant et al. 2016; Enescu et al. 2016; Viñas et al. 2016a). Industrial timber is the most important forest product (Masiero et al. 2016). In Spain, more than half of the wood cut in 2017 corresponded to conifers (9.6 Mm3 of cut wood), although approximately one third of this (3.6 Mm3) corresponded to P. radiata D.Don plantations outside the Mediterranean region sensu stricto (MAPA 2017). Subsequently, P. pinaster was by far the most cut, with 3.4 Mm3 of cut wood, which far exceeds other native species (e.g., next were P. sylvestris and P. nigra with 1.4 and 0.6 Mm3, respectively) and all of the native broad-leaved species (e.g. Populus spp. accounted for 0.5 Mm3 cut) (MAPA 2017). In Spain, the main destination of cut wood from most Mediterranean pines is timber, but the wood of P. halepensis Mill. is used for pellets, woodchips and briquettes (MAPA 2017). Other than timber, pines also provide biomass. In the southern Mediterranean, the primary forest product is firewood (Masiero et al. 2016) for which P. halepensis and P. brutia Ten. are used (Fady et al. 2003; Mauri et al. 2016). Biomass from pines is a resource with increasing potential to supply renewable energy demands (Perea-Moreno et al. 2017). All these activities require management actions such as shrub removal or thinning that improve stand structure and lower fire risk (García-Gonzalo et al. 2014; Madrigal et al. 2017), otherwise Mediterranean pinewoods are at risk of burning, as has happened extensively in recent decades (see Sect. 29.3.1).
In addition, pine forests provide a wide range of non-wood forest products (NWFP) (FAO and Plan Bleu 2018). In fact, NWFP account for the main use of forests in the Middle East and northern Africa (Croitoru 2007; Croitoru and Liagre 2013). Resin is one such forest product; it is obtained from P. pinaster in the western Mediterranean, although P. halepensis can also be tapped in the eastern Mediterranean (Calama et al. 2010; Spanos et al. 2010). Nowadays resin is a minor product, with an estimated value between €2.6 M and €3.2 M in Spain, Greece and Turkey (Masiero et al. 2016), but there has been an increase of resin production in Spain in recent years, from 1402 t in 2009 to 13,001 t in 2017 (MAPA 2017). Resin used to be the main product in many inland Spanish forests until it became unprofitable and exploitation of the forests was abandoned, resulting in improper management of pine stands and thus increasing fire risk, but also promoting a transition to Quercus-dominated or mixed Quercus-Pinus stands after fire (Torres et al. 2016).
Another very valuable NWFP that Mediterranean pine forests provide is pine nuts from P. pinea L. Production of pine nuts is very variable, because P. pinea is affected by climatic conditions and is also a masting species (Calama et al. 2011; Mutke et al. 2012; Pasalodos-Tato et al. 2016). Between 2003 and 2017, the average production in Spain was 6100 t/year (MAPA 2017), while the estimated annual pine nut production in the Mediterranean is estimated at around 30,000 t in shell, mostly in Portugal and Spain, but also in Italy and Turkey (Mutke et al. 2012). This high value has led to extensive planting of P. pinea in recent years in countries such as Portugal and Turkey (Küçüker and Baskent 2017; Valdiviesso et al. 2017).
Additionally, pine forests promote the growth and production of wild edible mushrooms with commercial value (e.g., Boletus and Lactarius, among others) to which forest management may be oriented (Tomao et al. 2017). As with other NWFPs, the estimated value of mushrooms may be equal or even greater than that of timber (Bonet et al. 2008; Calama et al. 2010; Rincón et al. this volume, Chapter 20).
Another NWFP produced by pines with an important contribution to the local economy is pine honey, produced by bees that collect the honeydew secreted by aphids sucking on P. brutia and P. halepensis. It represents about half the total honey production in Greece and Turkey (de-Miguel et al. 2014) and is the main source of income for nearly ten thousand families in Turkey (Croitoru and Liagre 2013).
2.2 Regulating Services
In addition to provisioning services, pine forests supply important regulation services. Forests are essential in preventing soil erosion (Anaya-Romero et al. 2016; Guerra et al. 2016; FAO and Plan Bleu 2018), and pines are particularly well suited to this since they are pioneer species that can withstand poor soils, steep slopes, strong radiation and other harsh conditions, and therefore have been used to reforest degraded landscapes (Fady et al. 2003; Burylo et al. 2012; Enescu et al. 2016; Mauri et al. 2016) and stabilize sand dunes (Cutini 2002; Pereira 2002; Viñas et al. 2016a, b). For example, most pine plantations in Spain have been established to regulate hydrological processes that carried important erosion and flood risk (Valbuena-Carabaña et al. 2010). Also, they have been used as pioneer species, which are more drought-tolerant and better adapted to poor soils, in order to restore and promote growth of other species. Pine forests, particularly those that have received management treatments (Rodríguez-Calcerrada et al. 2007; Prévosto et al. 2011), create suitable conditions for the recruitment of oak and other broad-leaved species in their understory (Sheffer 2012 and references therein; Van de Peer et al. 2018; Waitz and Sheffer this volume, Chapter 16), thus increasing the biodiversity of the ecosystem, which plays an important role in the maintenance and delivery of the goods and services that pine forests provide (Martínez-Jáuregui et al. 2019). Pine forests also harbor associated species with high conservation value. This is the case of sub-Mediterranean P. nigra forests, a priority habitat in the EU Habitats Directive, in which the largest European vulture, the black vulture (Aegypius monachus L.) nests in part of its range (Zaghi 2008).
Another important regulating service that pine forests provide is carbon sequestration. Pines are fast-growing species and store large amounts of carbon in their wood (Klein this volume, Chapter 7) and in the soil. In Italy, Mediterranean pines (P. pinaster, P. halepensis, P. pinea) accounted for 132.8 t carbon per ha in 2008–2009, which is higher than the carbon storage of most Mediterranean broad-leaved species (Gasparini and Di Cosmo 2015). In Spain, more than half of the total CO2 stored in pine forests is due to P. pinaster and P. sylvestris forests (Montero et al. 2005; del Río et al. 2017), and pine forests accumulated over 535 Mt CO2 in 1990 (Montero et al. 2005). The relevance of pine forests as a carbon pool becomes more prominent in more Mediterranean environments, with increased aridity, such as southern Spain, where conifer forests (mainly P. pinaster) account for the highest density of carbon (Anaya-Romero et al. 2016) and, during the twentieth century, pine plantations (mainly P. halepensis, P. pinaster and P. sylvestris) captured nearly as much carbon as oaks in a mountain ecosystem (Padilla et al. 2010).
2.3 Cultural Services
Pine forests provide a wide array of recreational and cultural services (see Orenstein this volume, Chapter 30). Hunting, as a highly regulated activity, is the most salient in the available statistics. Although no data exist for the specific contribution of pine forests to income from hunting, this activity accounts for 75% of the annual income from the category “other uses” (which also includes profit from water, recreational uses or aggregate extraction) of forest statistics in Spain (MAPA 2017). However, this evaluation is probably biased since hunting provides an easily accountable source of income, while carbon fixation and emission, recreation and other landscape values are omitted or undervalued (Campos et al. 2019). In fact, when these are accounted for, such as in the P. sylvestris forests in Sierra de Guadarrama, central Spain, very close to a large city such as Madrid, recreation accounted for half the value of timber, followed by conservation value (Caparrós et al. 2001). Recreational use is an increasing value of forests, including pine forests. For instance, there has been a pronounced increase in the forest area with recreational use as a main management goal since 2005 in south-eastern European countries (Forest Europe 2015). Finally, pine forests are used in a diverse range of scientific and educational activities.
3 Ecosystem Services Under Global Change
3.1 Fire and Ecosystem Services Provided by Pines
Wildfires can have positive and negative impacts on the ecosystem services provided by pine forests. In the short term, many of the services provided by pine forests are at risk of deterioration when they are affected by fire (Górriz-Mifsud et al. 2016). Fires obviously cause changes in esthetics that affect recreation and other cultural services. Also obvious are the potential losses of wood and wood products, but fires also affect the provisioning of other NWFPs. For instance, fire strongly decreases the production of mushrooms in pine forests (Martín-Pinto et al. 2006; Gassibe et al. 2011, 2014; Mediavilla et al. 2014). Regulating services can also be affected; many of the pine forests in Spain that come from plantations planted in the twentieth century are lacking adequate management and could easily be affected by fire (Valbuena-Carabaña et al. 2010). Therefore, the regulatory function that pine forests provide is highly vulnerable to fire, and soil erosion and runoff increase significantly after fire when pine forests and other Mediterranean vegetation burns (Cosandey et al. 2005; Mayor et al. 2007; Shakesby 2011; Wittenberg this volume, Chapter 23). Furthermore, a considerably large fraction of the carbon pool stored in pine forests is prone to mobilization during wildfire. Montealegre-Gracia et al. (2017) estimated CO2 emissions ranging from 20 to 100 t/ha in a P. halepensis forest. In addition, common post-fire practices, such as salvage logging, seem to reduce carbon sequestration (Serrano-Ortiz et al. 2011). However, fires also produce pyrogenic organic matter that remains in the soil, acting as a potentially important carbon sink (Santín et al. 2015).
Pine forests are among the main vegetation types affected by wildfire, and will likely continue so since climate change will increase fire risk (Moreno et al. this volume, Chapter 21). Most pine species show adaptations to fire (Ne’eman and Arianoutsou this volume, Chapter 22), and the most Mediterranean pines (i.e., P. halepensis, P. brutia, P. pinaster) can regenerate even after crown fires thanks to their serotinous cones. In the case of pines with adaptations to frequent, low intensity surface fires, such as P. nigra (Tapias et al. 2004; Fulé et al. 2008), absence of fire can lead to fuel accumulation and crown fires after which the species, and the services provided by the pines, disappear and thus fire within a specific, historical fire regime may have beneficial results (Morales-Molino et al. 2017; Pausas and Keeley 2019). However, increased frequency of fires with intervals shorter than the time needed to resupply the canopy seed bank and high fire severity can both constrain the regeneration of even the most fire-adapted P. halepensis and P. brutia (Kazanis and Arianoutsou 2004; Tessler et al. 2014; Kavgaci et al. 2016). For the more fire-sensitive mountain pines, P. sylvestris and P. nigra, a lack of regeneration after wildfires is a common phenomenon (Rodrigo et al. 2004; Vilà Cabrera et al. 2012; Christopoulou et al. 2014).
Because of the multiple services they provide, pines have been used in afforestation and reforestation projects throughout the Mediterranean Basin. However, due to their high susceptibility to burning, provision of such services may cease. The balance between planting of pines and pine stands being burned can illustrate the role of pines in forest fires. While most countries compile data about wildfires, these are usually not complete or accessible. To illustrate our point, we will focus on Spain, since fire statistics have been rather complete and available for over half a century. In a study of the fire history of Spain for the years 1974–1995, Moreno et al. (1998) showed that coniferous forests amounted to approximately 31% of the total burned area. Within the treed burned areas, the Pinus species that burned the most were P. pinaster (594 kha, 33%), P. halepensis (468 kha, 26%), P. sylvestris (162 kha, 9%), P. pinea and P. nigra (57 kha, 3% each). The burned pine trees were, on average, rather young, with a mean age for all pine species of 24.2 years, with little differences among species or over time in the last four decades (Table 29.1).
If we sum the entire burned area of Pinus species during the period of nearly 50 years of available statistics (1967–2015) (Fig. 29.1) and compare it with their plantation area from 1940 to 2013, we can roughly evaluate the role of pines in forest fires (Fig. 29.1). Pinus pinaster was the species most burned (826 kha) but was also the species most planted (912 kha), thus its balance was positive but only slightly. The next species in area burned was P. halepensis, with 709 kha burned, compared to 631 kha planted, thus it had a negative balance. The third-ranked species in area burned was P. sylvestris (192 kha), which had 659 kha planted, thus its balance was positive (70% remained unburned). In fact, many of these plantations were made in the wetter north-west of the country, and while this region is a hotspot for fires (Urbieta et al. 2019) many trees are still able to grow and be harvested (Schelhaas et al. 2018). Pinus radiata had 126 kha burned, and 254 kha planted. This species, which is planted in the wet, non-Mediterranean northern Spain, had a positive balance, but still half of the area planted burned. Pinus nigra had 110 kha burned of 441 kha planted, for a 75% positive balance, P. pinea had 79 kha burned from 337 kha planted (76% positive balance) and P. canariensis had 74 kha burned, from only 37 kha planted, for a negative balance of 50%. Overall, of 3299 kha of all the species that were planted, 2118 kha burned, that is, only 36% remained. This analysis, while rough, because there is no match between the areas planted and burned, shows that fires have very markedly affected Pinus species in Spain and that the probability of a pine plantation surviving in the long term was quite low overall during that period. The balance of the more typical Mediterranean species of the lowland areas (P. halepensis, P. pinaster and P. pinea) was nearly neutral (only 14% more area planted than burned).
3.2 Other Threats to Ecosystem Services
In addition to fire, pine forests are facing threats that may constrain their functionality and thus limit their ability to provide ecosystem services. For most pine species in Spain, increased aridity and competition with oaks severely limits their recruitment (Carnicer et al. 2014; Gazol et al. 2018). A decade-long drought episode in a P. pinaster forest in central Spain had negative impacts on growth and recruitment, and on tree survival during the decade following drought (Madrigal-González et al. 2017). For pines that have the limit of their distribution in the Mediterranean region, such as P. sylvestris, drought can limit growth and increase mortality at the most xeric sites (Gea-Izquierdo et al. 2014), and future predictions of growth for this and other species indicate a reduction in Spain and the rest of the Mediterranean (Gómez-Aparicio et al. 2011; Camarero et al. 2013; Sánchez-Salguero et al. 2017; Dorado-Liñán et al. 2019). Furthermore, the upward migration of P. sylvestris under climate change may be restricted by increased herbivory at the tree line during dry summers (Herrero et al. 2012).
Finally, increased warming induced by global change is affecting pines via increased pressure from pests and diseases – either new, introduced species, or existing species that become more aggressive with increased warming (Oliva this volume, Chapter 10). The case of the pine processionary moth (Thaumetopoea pytiocampa Denis & Schiffermüller, 1775) is illustrative of a pest with economic importance (Gatto et al. 2009) that is increasingly affecting pine stands due to global change. Warmer winter temperatures have been responsible for its expansion in recent decades (Hódar et al. 2003; Battisti et al. 2005). Furthermore, its expansion has been aided by human-mediated dispersal most likely by accidental introduction of pupae in the soil when transplanting large trees (Robinet et al. 2012), while the abundance of pine plantations throughout the Mediterranean also favors its expansion (Doblás-Miranda et al. 2017). The pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus (Steiner & Buhrer) Nickle) is another example of a recently introduced pine pathogen with potential for expansion throughout the Mediterranean Basin (Naves et al. 2016).
4 Conclusions
Pine forests and plantations constitute a very important source of ecosystem services in the Mediterranean Basin. Regarding provisioning services, wood production for both timber and firewood are important but with different uses and intensities depending on the pine species and with different geographical patterns (i.e. firewood plays a more important role in the southern Mediterranean Basin). Non-wood forest products are equally important, but resin tapping has experienced a declining trend in recent decades while pine nuts, edible mushrooms and pine honey production are still important contributors to local economies, and to which management of pine stands may be oriented. Pine forests and plantations provide valuable regulating services that can explain the historical plantation of pines throughout the Mediterranean Basin for erosion control and hydrological regulation. Nowadays they still fulfill that role, while their relevance as habitats for biodiversity and as carbon sinks is recognized. Additionally, pine forests are providers of cultural services that when accounted for can result in similar values as those of some provisioning services. Many of these ecosystem services can be interrupted or heavily modified, at least in the short term, by risks related to global change. Wildfire, drought and pests affect pine forests alone or in combination, and thus it is essential to properly evaluate services and risks to adapt their management.
References
Anaya-Romero M, Muñoz-Rojas M, Ibáñez B et al (2016) Evaluation of forest ecosystem services in Mediterranean areas. A regional case study in South Spain. Ecosyst Serv 20:82–90
Battisti A, Stastny M, Netherer S et al (2005) Expansion of geographic range in the pine processionary moth caused by increased winter temperatures. Ecol Appl 15:2084–2096
Bonet JA, Pukkala T, Fischer CR et al (2008) Empirical models for predicting the production of wild mushrooms in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forests in the Central Pyrenees. Ann For Sci 65:206
Burkhard B, Maes J (2017) Mapping ecosystem services. Advanced Books 1:e12837
Burylo M, Rey F, Bochet E et al (2012) Plant functional traits and species ability for sediment retention during concentrated flow erosion. Plant Soil 353:135–144
Calama R, Tome M, Sánchez-González M et al (2010) Modelling non-wood forest products in Europe: a review. For Syst 19:69–85
Calama R, Mutke S, Tomé J et al (2011) Modelling spatial and temporal variability in a zero-inflated variable: the case of stone pine (Pinus pinea L.) cone production. Ecol Model 222:606–618
Camarero JJ, Manzanedo RD, Sanchez-Salguero R et al (2013) Growth response to climate and drought change along an aridity gradient in the southernmost Pinus nigra relict forests. Ann For Sci 70:769–780
Campos P, Caparrós A, Oviedo JL et al (2019) Bridging the gap between national and ecosystem accounting application in Andalusian Forests, Spain. Ecol Econ 157:218–236
Caparrós A, Campos P, Montero G (2001) Applied multiple use forest accounting in the Guadarrama pinewoods (Spain). For Syst 10:91–108
Carnicer J, Coll M, Pons X et al (2014) Large-scale recruitment limitation in Mediterranean pines: the role of Quercus ilex and forest successional advance as key regional drivers. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:371–384
Christopoulou A, Fyllas NM, Andriopoulos P et al (2014) Post-fire regeneration patterns of Pinus nigra in a recently burned area in Mount Taygetos, Southern Greece: the role of unburned forest patches. For Ecol Manag 327:148–156
Cosandey C, AndréassianV MC et al (2005) The hydrological impact of the Mediterranean forest: a review of French research. J Hydrol 301:235–249
Croitoru L (2007) Valuing the non-timber forest products in the Mediterranean region. Ecol Econ 63:768–775
Croitoru L, Liagre L (2013) Contribution of forests to a green economy in the Middle East and North Africa region. Forêt Méditerranéenne 4:291–298
Cutini A (2002) Pines of silvicultural importance. CABI, Wallingford, UK, 608 pp
del Río M, Barbeito I, Bravo-Oviedo A et al (2017) Mediterranean pine forests: management effects on carbon stocks. In: Bravo F, LeMay V, Jandl R (eds) Managing forest ecosystems: the challenge of climate change. Springer, Cham, pp 301–327
de-Miguel S, Pukkala T, Yeşil A (2014) Integrating pine honeydew honey production into forest management optimization. Eur J For Res 133:423–432
Doblás-Miranda E, Alonso R, Arnan X et al (2017) A review of the combination among global change factors in forests, shrublands and pastures of the Mediterranean Region: beyond drought effects. Glob Planet Chang 148:42–54
Dorado-Liñán I, Piovesan G, Martínez-Sancho E et al (2019) Geographical adaptation prevails over species-specific determinism in trees’ vulnerability to climate change at Mediterranean rear-edge forests. Glob Change Biol 25:1296–1314
Durrant TH, De Rigo D, Caudullo G (2016) Pinus sylvestris in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European atlas of forest tree species. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp 132–133
Enescu CM, de Rigo D, Caudullo G et al (2016) Pinus nigra in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European atlas of forest tree species. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp 126–127
Fady B, Semerci H, Vendramin GG (2003) EUFORGEN technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) and Brutia pine (Pinus brutia). Bioversity International
FAO, Plan Bleu (2018) State of Mediterranean forests 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome/Plan Bleu, Marseille
Forest Europe (2015) State of Europe’s Forests 2015
Fulé PZ, Ribas M, Gutiérrez E et al (2008) Forest structure and fire history in an old Pinus nigra forest, eastern Spain. For Ecol Manag 255:1234–1242
García-Gonzalo J, Pukkala T, Borges JG (2014) Integrating fire risk in stand management scheduling. An application to Maritime pine stands in Portugal. Ann Oper Res 219:379–395
Gasparini P, Di Cosmo L (2015) Forest carbon in Italian forests: stocks, inherent variability and predictability using NFI data. For Ecol Manag 337:186–195
Gassibe PV, Fabero RF, Hernández-Rodríguez M et al (2011) Fungal community succession following wildfire in a Mediterranean vegetation type dominated by Pinus pinaster in Northwest Spain. For Ecol Manag 262:655–662
Gassibe PV, Fabero RF, Hernández-Rodríguez M et al (2014) Post-fire production of mushrooms in Pinus pinaster forests using classificatory models. J For Res 19:348–356
Gatto P, Zocca A, Battisti A et al (2009) Economic assessment of managing processionary moth in pine forests: a case-study in Portugal. J Environ Manag 90:683–691
Gazol A, Camarero JJ, Sangüesa-Barreda G et al (2018) Post-drought resilience after forest die-off: shifts in regeneration, composition, growth and productivity. Front Plant Sci 9:1546
Gea-Izquierdo G, Viguera B, Cabrera M et al (2014) Drought induced decline could portend widespread pine mortality at the xeric ecotone in managed Mediterranean pine-oak woodlands. For Ecol Manag 320:70–82
Gómez-Aparicio L, García-Valdés R, Ruiz-Benito P et al (2011) Disentangling the relative importance of climate, size and competition on tree growth in Iberian forests: implications for forest management under global change. Glob Change Biol 17:2400–2414
Górriz-Mifsud E, Varela E, Piqué M et al (2016) Demand and supply of ecosystem services in a Mediterranean forest: computing payment boundaries. Ecosyst Serv 17:53–63
Guerra CA, Maes J, Geijzendorffer I et al (2016) An assessment of soil erosion prevention by vegetation in Mediterranean Europe: current trends of ecosystem service provision. Ecol Indic 60:213–222
Herrero A, Zamora R, Castro J et al (2012) Limits of pine forest distribution at the treeline: herbivory matters. Plant Ecol 213:459–469
Hódar JA, Castro J, Zamora R (2003) Pine processionary caterpillar Thaumetopoea pityocampa as a new threat for relict Mediterranean Scots pine forests under climatic warming. Biol Conserv 110:123–129
Kavgaci A, Örtel E, Torres I et al (2016) Early postfire vegetation recovery of Pinus brutia forests: effects of fire severity, prefire stand age, and aspect. Turk J Agric For 40:723–736
Kazanis D, Arianoutsou M (2004) Factors determining low Mediterranean ecosystems resilience to fire: the case of Pinus halepensis forests. In: Arianoutsou M, Papanastasis VP (eds) Ecology, conservation and management of mediterranean climate ecosystems. Millpress. (electronic edition)
Klein T (this volume) Carbon allocation dynamics in Mediterranean pines under stress. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Springer, pp 117–128
Küçüker DM, Baskent EZ (2017) State of stone pine (Pinus pinea) forests in Turkey and their economic importance for rural development. In: Mutke S, Carrasquinho I, Correia AC (eds) Mediterranean pine nuts from forests and plantations, 122. Zaragoza, CIHEAM, pp 111–117
Madrigal J, Fernández-Migueláñez I, Hernando C et al (2017) Does forest biomass harvesting for energy reduce fire hazard in the Mediterranean basin? A case study in the Caroig Massif (Eastern Spain). Eur J For Res 136:13–26
Madrigal-González J, Herrero A, Ruiz-Benito P et al (2017) Resilience to drought in a dry forest: insights from demographic rates. For Ecol Manag 389:167–175
MAPA (2017) Anuario de estadística forestal 2017. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/desarrollo-rural/estadisticas/forestal_anuario_2017.aspx. Accessed 10 Jan 2020
Martínez-Jáuregui M, White PC, Touza J et al (2019) Untangling perceptions around indicators for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 38:100952
Martín-Pinto P, Vaquerizo H, Peñalver F et al (2006) Early effects of a wildfire on the diversity and production of fungal communities in Mediterranean vegetation types dominated by Cistus ladanifer and Pinus pinaster in Spain. For Ecol Manag 225:296–305
Masiero M, Pettenella DM, Secco L (2016) From failure to value: economic valuation for a selected set of products and services from Mediterranean forests. For Syst 25:e051
Mauri A, Di Leo M, de Rigo D et al (2016) Pinus halepensis and Pinus brutia in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European atlas of forest tree species. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, pp 122–123
Mayor AG, Bautista S, Llovet J et al (2007) Post-fire hydrological and erosional responses of a Mediterranean landscape: seven years of catchment-scale dynamics. Catena 71:68–75
Mediavilla O, Oria-de-Rueda JA, Martín-Pinto P (2014) Changes in sporocarp production and vegetation following wildfire in a Mediterranean forest ecosystem dominated by Pinus nigra in Northern Spain. For Ecol Manag 331:85–92
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Montealegre-Gracia AL, Lamelas-Gracia MT, García-Martín A et al (2017) Using low-density discrete Airborne Laser Scanning data to assess the potential carbon dioxide emission in case of a fire event in a Mediterranean pine forest. GISci Remote Sens 54:721–740
Montero G, Ruiz-Peinado R, Muñoz M (2005) Producción de biomasa y fijación de CO2 por los bosques españoles. INIA-Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
Montes C, Santos Martín F, Aguado M et al (2011) La evaluación de los ecosistemas del Milenio de España. Síntesis de resultados. Fundación Biodiversidad. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, y Medio Rural y Marino
Morales-Molino C, Tinner W, García-Antón M et al (2017) The historical demise of Pinus nigra forests in the Northern Iberian Plateau (south-western Europe). J Ecol 105:634–646
Moreno JM, Vázquez A, Vélez R (1998) Recent fire history of forest fires in Spain. In: Moreno JM (ed) Large forest fires. Backhuys, Leiden, pp 159–185
Moreno JM, Morales-Molino C, Torres I, Arianoutsou M (this volume) Fire in Mediterranean pine forests, past, present and future. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 421–456
Mutke S, Calama R, González-Martínez SC et al (2012) Mediterranean stone pine: botany and horticulture. Hortic Rev 39:153–201
Naves P, Bonifácio L, de Sousa E (2016) The pine wood nematode and its local vectors in the Mediterranean Basin. In: Paine TD, Lieutier F (eds) Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest systems. Springer, pp 329–378
Ne’eman G, Arianoutsou M (this volume) Mediterranean pines – adaptations to fire. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 457–480
Oliva J (this volume) Forest disease affecting pines in the Mediterranean Basin. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 183–198
Orenstein D (this volume) The cultural ecosystem services of Mediterranean pine forests. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 631–655
Padilla FM, Vidal B, Sánchez J et al (2010) Land-use changes and carbon sequestration through the twentieth century in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem: implications for land management. J Environ Manag 91:2688–2695
Pasalodos-Tato M, Pukkala T, Calama R et al (2016) Optimal management of Pinus pinea stands when cone and timber production are considered. Eur J For Res 135:607–619
Pausas JG, Keeley JE (2019) Wildfires as an ecosystem service. Front Ecol Environ 17:289–295
Perea-Moreno AJ, Perea-Moreno MÁ, Hernandez-Escobedo Q et al (2017) Towards forest sustainability in Mediterranean countries using biomass as fuel for heating. J Clean Prod 156:624–634
Pereira JS (2002) Pinus pinaster. In: CABI (ed) Pines of silvicultural importance. CABI publishing, pp 316–328
Prévosto B, Monnier Y, Ripert C et al (2011) Can we use shelterwoods in Mediterranean pine forests to promote oak seedling development? For Ecol Manag 262:1426–1433
Rincón A, Pérez-Izquierdo L, de-Miguel S et al (this volume) Mycorhizae in Mediterranean pine and mixed forests. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 395–418
Robinet C, Imbert C-E, Rousselet J et al (2012) Human-mediated long-distance jumps of the pine processionary moth in Europe. Biol Invasions 14:1557–1569
Rodrigo A, Retana J, Pico FX (2004) Direct regeneration is not the only response of Mediterranean forest to large fires. Ecology 85:716–729
Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, Pardos JA, Gil L et al (2007) Summer field performance of Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl and Quercus pyrenaica Willd seedlings, planted in three sites with contrasting canopy cover. New For 33:67–80
Sánchez-Salguero R, Camarero JJ, Gutiérrez E et al (2017) Assessing forest vulnerability to climate warming using a process-based model of tree growth: bad prospects for rear-edges. Glob Change Biol 23:2705–2719
Santín C, Doerr SH, Preston CM et al (2015) Pyrogenic organic matter production from wildfires: a missing sink in the global carbon cycle. Glob Change Biol 21:1621–1633
Schelhaas M-J, Fridman J, Hengeveld G et al (2018) Actual European forest management by region, tree species and owner based on 714,000 re-measured trees in national forest inventories. PLoS One 13(11):e0207151
Serrano-Ortiz P, Marañón-Jiménez S, Reverter BR et al (2011) Post-fire salvage logging reduces carbon sequestration in Mediterranean coniferous forest. For Ecol Manag 262:2287–2296
Shakesby RA (2011) Post-wildfire soil erosion in the Mediterranean: review and future research directions. Earth-Sci Rev 105:71–100
Sheffer E (2012) A review of the development of Mediterranean pine–oak ecosystems after land abandonment and afforestation: are they novel ecosystems? Ann For Sci 69:429–443
Spanos K, Gaitanis D, Spanos I (2010) Resin production in natural Aleppo pine stands in northern Evia, Greece. Web Ecol 10:38–43
Tapias R, Climent J, Pardos JA et al (2004) Life histories of Mediterranean pines. Plant Ecol 171:53–68
Tessler N, Wittenberg L, Provizor E et al (2014) The influence of short-interval recurrent forest fires on the abundance of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis Mill.) on Mount Carmel, Israel. For Ecol Manag 324:109–116
Tomao A, Bonet JA, de Aragón JM et al (2017) Is silviculture able to enhance wild forest mushroom resources? Current knowledge and future perspectives. For Ecol Manag 402:102–114
Torres I, Pérez B, Quesada J et al (2016) Forest shifts induced by fire and management legacies in a Pinus pinaster woodland. For Ecol Manag 361:309–317
Urbieta IR, Franquesa M, Viedma O et al (2019) Fire activity and burned forest lands decreased during the last three decades in Spain. Ann For Sci 76:90
Valbuena-Carabaña M, de Heredia UL, Fuentes-Utrilla P et al (2010) Historical and recent changes in the Spanish forests: a socio-economic process. Rev Palaeobot Palyno 162:492–506
Valdiviesso T, Pimpao M, Trindade CS et al (2017) Reproductive phenology of Pinus pinea. In: Mutke S, Carrasquinho I, Correia AC (eds) Mediterranean pine nuts from forests and plantations, vol 122. CIHEAM, Zaragoza, pp 63–68
Van de Peer T, Mereu S, Verheyen K et al (2018) Tree seedling vitality improves with functional diversity in a Mediterranean common garden experiment. For Ecol Manag 409:614–633
Vázquez de la Cueva A (2016) Incendios forestales en la España peninsular (1974-2010) – Análisis temporal y espacial desde una perspectiva ecológica. Monografías INIA, Serie Forestal 29: 203
Vilà-Cabrera A, Rodrigo A, Martínez-Vilalta J et al (2012) Lack of regeneration and climatic vulnerability to fire of Scots pine may induce vegetation shifts at the southern edge of its distribution. J Biogeogr 39:488–496
Viñas RA, Caudullo G, Oliveira S et al (2016a) Pinus pinaster in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European atlas of forest tree species; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg. pp 128–129
Viñas RA, Caudullo G, Oliveira S et al (2016b) Pinus pinea in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. European atlas of forest tree species; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 204. pp 130–131
Waitz Y, Sheffer E (this volume) Dynamics of mixed pine–oak forests. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 345–362
Wittenberg L (this volume) Post-fire soil erosion – the Mediterranean perception. In: Ne’eman G, Osem Y (eds) Pines and their mixed forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean basin. Springer, pp 481–496
Zaghi D (2008) Management of Natura 2000 habitats. 9530 *(Sub)-Mediterranean pine forests with endemic black pines. European Commission
Acknowledgments
We (JMM, IT) acknowledge funding from the Government of Spain (project CGL2016-78357-R).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Torres, I., Moreno, J.M., Morales-Molino, C., Arianoutsou, M. (2021). Ecosystem Services Provided by Pine Forests. In: Ne'eman, G., Osem, Y. (eds) Pines and Their Mixed Forest Ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Managing Forest Ecosystems, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63625-8_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63625-8_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63624-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63625-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)