Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bariatric Data Management Reporting Worldwide

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery

  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

The prevalence of overweight and obesity is increasing globally. The need for bariatric surgery services worldwide has increased exponentially and a rising number of surgeons that are relatively new to the field are undertaking bariatric and metabolic procedures.

We thus need to develop strategies for effective data collection and analysis to provide benchmarks for surgical outcomes. Clinical registries are a portal that can facilitate this task. They can help establish the benefits of bariatric surgery as a successful means of weight loss and comorbidity improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71–2, 1996/01/13/.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Skelly AC, Chapman J. Evidence-based medicine (EBM): origins and modern application to spine care. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2011;2:11–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. AHRQ Methods for Effective Health Care. In: Gliklich RE, Dreyer NA, Leavy MB, editors. Registries for evaluating patient outcomes: a user's guide. 3rd ed. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hickey GL, Grant SW, Cosgriff R, Dimarakis I, Pagano D, Kappetein AP, et al. Clinical registries: governance, management, analysis and applications. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:605–14, 2013/10//undefined.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dreyer NA, Garner S. Registries for robust evidence. JAMA. 2009;302:790–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Poelemeijer YQM, Liem RSL, Våge V, Mala T, Sundbom M, Ottosson J, et al. Perioperative outcomes of primary bariatric surgery in North-Western Europe: a pooled multinational registry analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3916–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sakran N, Sherf-Dagan S, Blumenfeld O, Romano-Zelekha O, Raziel A, Keren D, et al. Incidence and risk factors for mortality following bariatric surgery: a Nationwide registry study. Obes Surg. 2018;28:2661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eliasson B, Liakopoulos V, Franzén S, Näslund I, Svensson AM, Ottosson J, et al. Cardiovascular disease and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes after bariatric surgery in Sweden: a nationwide, matched, observational cohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:847–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, van Haselen R, Griffin M, Fisher P. The Hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox NS, Brennan JS, Chasen ST. Clinical estimation of fetal weight and the Hawthorne effect. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;141:111–4, 2008/12//undefined.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Landsberger HA. Hawthorne revisited: management and the worker: its critics, and developments in human relations in industry. Ithaca: Cornell University; 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hedenbro JL, Näslund E, Boman L, Lundegårdh G, Bylund A, Ekelund M, et al. Formation of the Scandinavian obesity surgery registry, SOReg. Obes Surg. 2015;25:1893–900.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. American College of Surgeons. 2021. MBSAQIP Participant Use Data File (PUF). [online] Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip/participant-use. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.

  14. Kumar SB, Hamilton BC, Wood SG, Rogers SJ, Carter JT, Lin MY. Is laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy safer than laparoscopic gastric bypass? A comparison of 30-day complications using the MBSAQIP data registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:264–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Janik MR, Mustafa RR, Rogula TG, Alhaj Saleh A, Abbas M, Khaitan L. Safety of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and roux-en-Y gastric bypass in elderly patients – analysis of the MBSAQIP. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:1276–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chaar ME, Lundberg P, Stoltzfus J. Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on metabolic and bariatric surgery accreditation and quality improvement program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:545–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Birkmeyer NJ, Dimick JB, Share D, Hawasli A, English WJ, Genaw J, et al. Hospital complication rates with bariatric surgery in Michigan. JAMA. 2010;304:435–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Simmer TL, Gustafson S. Collaborative quality initiatives – Blues Perspectives | BCBSM | Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. [online] Blues Perspectives | BCBSM | Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan. 2021. Available at: https://bluesperspectives.wordpress.com/tag/collaborative-quality-initiatives/. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.

  19. Helse-bergen.no. 2019. SOReg Annual Report Norway and Sweden December 2019. [online] Available at: https://helse-bergen.no/seksjon/soreg/Documents/Felles%20%C3%A5rsrapport%20med%20Sverige%202017%20og%202018.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  20. Morino M, Toppino M, Forestieri P, Angrisani L, Allaix ME, Scopinaro N. Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg. 2007;246:1002–7; discussion 1007–9, 2007/12//undefined.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bomss.org.uk. 2014. The UK National Bariatric Surgery Registry. Second Registry Report 2014. [online] Available at: http://www.bomss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Extract_from_the_NBSR_2014_Report.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  22. E-dendrite.com. 2010. The National Bariatric Surgery Registry First Registry Report to March 2010. [online] Available at: https://e-dendrite.com/Publishing/Reports/Bariatric/NBSR2010.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  23. Bomss.org.uk. 2020. The UK National Bariatric Surgery Registry. Third Registry Report 2020. [online] Available at: https://www.bomss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/NBSR-Third-Report-for-website.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2021.

  24. Public Health and Preventive Medicine. 2021. Bariatric Surgery Registry. [online] Available at: https://www.monash.edu/medicine/sphpm/registries/bariatric [Accessed 1 March 2021].

  25. Stroh C, Weiner R, Wolff S, Knoll C, Manger T. Are there gender-specific aspects in obesity and metabolic surgery? Data analysis from the German bariatric surgery registry. Viszeralmedizin. 2014;30:125–32.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stroh C, Weiner R, Horbach T, Ludwig K, Dressler M, Lippert H, et al. New data on quality assurance in bariatric surgery in Germany. Zentralbl Chir. 2013;138:180–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Poelemeijer YQM, Liem RSL, Nienhuijs SW. A Dutch Nationwide bariatric quality registry: DATO. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1602–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Poelemeijer YQM, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, Wouters M, Nienhuijs SW, Liem RSL. Textbook outcome: an ordered composite measure for quality of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2019;29:1287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Blumenfeld O, Goitein D, Liverant-Taub S, Diker D, Sakran N, Keinan-Boker L. The Israel National Bariatric Surgery Registry: the inception process. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16:80–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ifso.com. 2014. First IFSO Global Registry Report 2014. [online] Available at: https://www.ifso.com/pdf/ifso-2014-final.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  31. E-dendrite.com. 2019. [online] Available at: https://e-dendrite.com/Publishing/Reports/Bariatric/IFSO2019.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  32. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, Dixon J, Liem R, Ottosson J, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the fourth IFSO global registry report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29:782–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Welbourn R, Pournaras DJ, Dixon J, Higa K, Kinsman R, Ottosson J, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the second IFSO global registry report 2013–2015. Obes Surg. 2018;28:313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Directive 95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. Stud Health Technol Inform. 1996;27:83–118.

    Google Scholar 

  35. He S, Ganzinger M, Knaup P. The intellectual property management for data sharing in a German liver cancer research network. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012;180:891–5.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bomss.org.uk. 2013. [online] Available at: http://www.bomss.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Bariatric-Surgeon-Level-Outcomes-Data-Report-2-July-2013.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  37. Welke KF, Ferguson TB Jr, Coombs LP, Dokholyan RS, Murray CJ, Schrader MA, et al. Validity of the society of thoracic surgeons national adult cardiac surgery database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1137–9, 2004/04//undefined.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. van der Heijden GJ, Donders AR, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Imputation of missing values is superior to complete case analysis and the missing-indicator method in multivariable diagnostic research: a clinical example. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1102–9, 2006/10//undefined.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. 2021. MBSAQIP | American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. [online] Available at: https://asmbs.org/integrated-health/mbsaqip. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

  40. Keogh B. Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) breast implants: final report. [online] GOV.UK. 2012. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/poly-implant-prothese-pip-breast-implants-final-report-of-the-expert-group. Accessed 2 Mar 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bariatric & Upper GI Unit, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

    Rishi Singhal

  2. Consultant General Surgeon, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

    Spyridon Kapoulas

  3. Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton, UK

    Richard Welbourn

Authors
  1. Spyridon Kapoulas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Welbourn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rishi Singhal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Homerton University Hospital, London, UK

    Sanjay Agrawal

Section Editor information

  1. Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, United Kingdom

    William Hawkins

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kapoulas, S., Welbourn, R., Singhal, R. (2023). Bariatric Data Management Reporting Worldwide. In: Agrawal, S. (eds) Obesity, Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60596-4_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60596-4_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60595-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60596-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation