Abstract
Different approaches have tried to unravel the ways humour works in politics. We consider the relevance that humour practices and products acquire after the affective turn in political and social theory and examine more specifically the populist mode of humour from the perspective of moral tribalism. We focus on a threatening and self-indulgent humour that fuels collective emotional shockwaves and becomes an aggressively disrespectful weapon for discrediting and ridiculing the opponents while inciting large audiences in highly polarized scenarios. The populist humour combines with the strategy of taking advantage of the proliferation of pseudo-truths in current postfactual politics and (post) truth markets. Arguably, populist humour enforces the moods and consumers’ attitudes that are only sensitive to alternative facts and make justified information ridiculous. It is directly addressed to those who are willing to reaffirm their unexamined beliefs and to complacently swallow the agreeable manipulation that is offered to them. We claim that political humour should reinforce the conflict around the emotions and the facts, instead of supplanting the latter, and be at the service of public positioning and critical discrepancies of the emotional citizens without surrendering to the hegemony of post-truth politics.
The research resulting in this chapter was part of Civic Constellation III: Democracy, Constitutionalism, and Anti-Liberalism project (Spain’s National Research Fund, PGC2018-093573-B-100) and COST Action 16211 Reappraising Intellectual Debates on Civic Rights and Democracy in Europe (RECAST).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Billig, Michael. 2005. Laughter and Ridicule. Towards a Social Critique of Humour. London: Sage.
Brubaker, Roger. 2017. Between Nationalism and Civilizationism: The European Populist Moment in Comparative Perspective. Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (8): 1191–1226.
Buckley, Francis H. 2003. The Morality of Laughter. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Carroll, Noël. 2014. Humor. A Very Short Introduction. London: Oxford University Press.
d’Ancona, Matthew. 2017. Post Truth. London: Penguin.
Davies, Christie. 2011. Jokes and Targets. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Eagleton, Terry. 2019. Humor. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Eatwell, Roger, and Matthew Goodwin. 2018. National Populism. The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. London: Pelican.
Ford, Thomas E. 2014. Prejudice, Humor And. In Encyclopedia of Humor Studies, ed. Salvatore Attardo, vol. 2, 594–596. California: SAGE Publications.
Ford, Thomas E., and Mark Ferguson. 2004. Social Consequences of Disparagement Humor: A Prejudiced Norm Theory. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8 (1): 79–94.
Greene, Joshua. 2013. Moral Tribes. Emotion, Reason, and the Gap Between Us and Them. New York: Penguin Press.
Greene, Viveca. 2019. ‘Deplorable’ Satire: Alt-Right Memes, White Genocide Tweets, and Redpilling Normies’. Studies in American Humor 5 (1): 31–69.
Haidt, Jonathan. 2012. The Righteous Mind. Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
Harsin, Jayson. 2018. Post-truth and Critical Communication. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Communication and Critical Studies, ed. Dana Cloud. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hobbes, Thomas. 1982. Leviathan. New York: Penguin.
Hochschild, Arlie Russell. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning in the American Right. New York: The New Press.
Krastev, Ivan. 2017. After Europe. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Lewis, Paul. 2006. Cracking Up: American Humor in a Time of Conflict. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lockyer, Sharon, and Michale Pickering, eds. 2005. Beyond a Joke. The Limits of Humour. New York: Palgrave.
Lombardini, John. 2018. The Politics of Socratic Humor. Oakland: University of California Press.
Lorenz, Konrad. 1963. On Aggression. New York: Bantam.
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marcus, George. 2002. The Sentimental Citizen. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.
McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Miller, Patrick. 2011. The Emotional Citizen: Emotion as a Function of Political Sophistication. Political Psychology 32 (4): 575–600.
Minsky, Marvin. 1986. The Society of the Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Moffitt, Benjamin. 2016. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. California: Stanford University Press.
Morreall, John. 1983. Taking Laughter Seriously. Albany: SUNY Press.
———. 2005. Humour and the Conduct of Politics. In Beyond a Joke. The Limits of Humour, ed. Sharon Lockyer and Michale Pickering, 63–79. New York: Palgrave.
———. 2016. Philosophy of Humor. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/humor/.
Mudde, Cass. 2004. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563.
Mudde, Cass, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mulkay, Michael Joseph. 1988. On Humor. Its Nature and Its Place in Modern Society. New York: Basil Blackwell.
Müller, Jan-Werner. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Nagel, Angela. 2017. Kill All Normies. Washington: Zero Books.
Neuman, Russel, Georges Marcus, Ann N. Crigler, and Michael Mackuen, eds. 2007. The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Nussbaum, Martha. 2013. Political Emotions. Why Love Matters for Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Provine, Robert. 2000. Laughter: A Scientific Investigation. New York: Viking.
———. 2012. Curious Behaviour. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Rooduijn, Matthijs, Wouter van der Brug, and Sarah L. de Lange. 2016. Expressing or Fuelling Discontent? The Relationship between Populist Voting and Political Discontent. Electoral Studies 43: 32–40.
Rooduijn, Matthijs, Wouter van der Brug, Sarah L. de Lange, and Jante Parlevliet. 2017. Persuasive Populism? Estimating the Effect of Populist Messages on Political Cynicism. Politics and Governance 5 (4): 136–145.
Rozin, Paul, Jonathan Haidt, and Clark McCauley. 2008. Disgust: The Body and Soul Emotion in the 21st Century. In Disgust and Its Disorders, ed. D. McKay and O. Olatunji, 9–29. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Sørensen, Majken Jul. 2016. Humour in Political Activism. Creative Nonviolent Resistance. New York: Palgrave.
Thompson, Simon, and Paul Hoggett, eds. 2012. Politics and the Emotions: The Affect Turn in Contemporary Political Studies. London: Continuum.
Tsakona, Villi, and Diana E. Popa, eds. 2011. Studies in Political Humor: In Between Political Critique and Public Entertainment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vermes, Tirmur. 2012. Er is wieder da. Köln: Eichborn Verlag.
Wild, Barbara, Michael Erb, Michael Eyb, Mathias Bartels, and Wolfgang Grodd. 2003. Why Are Smiles Contagious? An fMRI Study of the Interaction between Perception of Facial Affect and Facial Movements. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 123: 17–36.
Yalcintas, Altug, ed. 2015. Creativity and Humour in Occupy Movements. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gil, J., Brea, S. (2021). Emotional Shockwaves, Populist Mode of Humour and Post-Truth Politics. In: Falcato, A., Graça da Silva, S. (eds) The Politics of Emotional Shockwaves . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56021-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56021-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56020-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56021-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)