Abstract
Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has been treated successfully since the late 1970s. In adult patients, high-dose extended field radiation was used for early-stage disease and chemotherapy combinations or combined-modality treatment for advanced disease. In children, chemotherapy was applied across all disease stages, and radiotherapy and field size were reduced. With rising concerns about late effects, number and composition of chemotherapy cycles were adapted to individual risk factors. Radiotherapy was successfully reduced over eight consecutive DAL/GPOH-HD/EuroNet-PHL trials. Therapy was further tailored by using FDG-PET imaging for initial staging and response assessment. Procarbazine was gradually eliminated to reduce the risk of male infertility; etoposide and doxorubicin were substituted to reduce the cumulative alkylating dose. Long-term survivors of pediatric HL are at risk for a wide range of late effects with second malignant neoplasm and cardiovascular diseases as leading causes of death. Other late effects include pulmonary dysfunction, fertility impairment, thyroid dysfunction, fatigue, and local atrophy of muscle and connective tissue. Excess risks remain significantly elevated after decades and are clearly associated with extent of treatment exposures. With adoption of new agents and contemporary treatment techniques, late effect risks need to be further monitored and follow-up recommendations updated.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma in Childhood and Adolescence
Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has now been treated successfully in cooperative group trials [1,2,3,4,5] since the late 1970s. In adult patients with early-stage disease, high-dose extended field radiation was shown to be effective. Chemotherapy combinations of mechlorethamine, vincristine, procarbazine and prednisone as well as doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD) or combined-modality treatment were only given for advanced disease [6]. For children, these treatments were modified by reducing radiotherapy and field size and applying chemotherapy across all disease stages. When concerns about late effects of treatment in aging survivors of pediatric cancer emerged [7,8,9,10], general treatment approaches started to change. The use of alkylators was reduced, and the number and composition of chemotherapy cycles were adapted to individual risk factors [2,3,4, 11, 12]. Radiotherapy (RT) was limited to involved fields and doses adapted to disease risk [1,2,3,4]. Furthermore, the concept of tailoring therapy in dose-dense regimens by using early response assessment was refined [12]. Procarbazine was gradually eliminated to reduce the risk of male infertility; etoposide and doxorubicine were substituted to reduce the cumulative alkylating dose [12,13,14,15]. Varied treatment approaches for pediatric HL have evolved by collaboration among cooperative groups. Most European and North American study groups have pursued combined-modality treatment approaches [4, 14, 16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. Central and South American groups however used to favor chemotherapy-only regimes [26, 27].
1.1 Evolution of Treatment by Consecutive Trials
The most recent European trial builds on the experience from eight successive DAL/GPOH study generations starting the first trial in 1978. Treatment of pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma has stepwise been optimized since and established the current standard in the participating countries. From the second study generation (DAL-HD-82) onward, the backbone of the treatment strategy has been constituted, and changes have evolved gradually.
Patients have been stratified into three treatment groups (TG-1, TG-2, and TG-3) according to Ann Arbor stage (TG-1 stage IA/B and IIA; TG-2 stage IEA/B, IIEA, IIB, and IIA; TG-3 stage IIEB, IIIEA/B, IIIB, and IVA/B). All patients started treatment with two intensive induction chemotherapy cycles. Initially, the OPPA cycle comprised the standard treatment for induction, and later the OEPA cycle was used.
Patients in TG-2 and TG-3 received two and four chemotherapy cycles for consolidation, respectively. The COPP cycle comprised the standard consolidation treatment, and the COPDAC cycle was used later.
Following chemotherapy, all patients used to receive involved field radiotherapy (RT). Then involved-node RT was administered in selected cases only and based on response assessment. For details and treatment evolution over 30 years from DAL-HD 78 up to GPOH- HD 2002, see Table 22.1.
1.2 Elimination of Procarbazine and Introduction of Dose-Dense Chemotherapy Regimen to Preserve Male Fertility
After it became apparent that procarbazine induces male infertility [28], several attempts were made to eliminate procarbazine from the OPPA (vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin) and COPP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) cycle in order to reduce male infertility and preserve high cure rates.
In the DAL-HD 85 study, procarbazine was omitted in OPA (vincristine, prednisone, doxorubicin) and replaced by methotrexate in COMP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, methotrexate, prednisone). By eliminating procarbazine, male fertility indeed was preserved [28, 29], but treatment efficacy was compromised with 4-year EFS rate dropping to 54–86% [30]. In the following study generation DAL-HD 87, procarbazine was reintroduced into the COPP cycle but still omitted in the OPA cycle. 7-year EFS and overall survival (OS) rates for all patients improved (85% and 97%, respectively) [31] but still were lower than in the previous DAL-HD 82 study generation. Induction treatment was therefore re-intensified in the following DAL-HD 90 study: female patients received again OPPA cycles; in male patients, procarbazine was replaced by 500 mg/m2 etoposide given over 4 days (OEPA) [4]. With this strategy, EFS rate and OS improved again to results comparable to the previous DAL-HD 82 study although therapy intensity was clearly reduced. By introducing etoposide, the rate of male infertility was significantly reduced [32] in TG-1 (2× OEPA), while about half of the male patients in TG-2 and TG-3 still showed abnormal FSH values after 2× or 4× COPP cycles. There was however a tendency for worse EFS in male patients compared to female patients. Based on the assumption that OEPA was less effective than OPPA, OEPA was intensified extending etoposide administration from 4 to 5 days (OE*PA with 20% more etoposide). Furthermore procarbazine was replaced by dacarbazine in the COPP cycle resulting in COPDAC (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, dacarbazine, prednisone) as procarbazine could not be dropped without being replaced by an appropriate substitute. Dacarbazine is less likely to cause infertility in males and a premature menopause in females. In the following HD 2002 pilot study, all male patients received a completely procarbazine-free regimen with intensified OE*PA and COPDAC cycles. Outcomes of male patients treated with the OEPA-COPDAC regimen were comparable to those of female patients receiving the OPPA-COPP standard treatment [14]. In contrast to these gender-stratified trials, the effect of OE*PA-COPDAC versus OE*PA-COPP was the subject of the following EuroNET-PHL-C1 trial. All patients now received OE*PA, but patients in intermediate- (TG-2) and high-risk (TG-3) groups were randomized to receive either COPP or COPDAC.
1.3 Response Adaptation to Reduce or Eliminate RT
In HL trials in adults, RT remains an essential component of treatment, especially for patients with early-stage disease who are treated with ABVD chemotherapy. The combined-modality approaches provide high response rates with EFS rates of 90%, but the risk of radiation-induced late effects such as secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and thyroid dysfunction in survivors after pediatric HL increases throughout their lifetime [9, 10, 33,34,35]. Pediatric HL study groups therefore balance the risk-benefit ration differently.
The DAL/GPOH-HD/EuroNet-PHL study group successfully reduced RT over eight consecutive trials. For the development of RT regimen by systematic radiotherapy reduction and elimination strategies in the DAL/GPOH-HD/EuroNet-PHL trials, see Table 22.1.
In the GPOH-HD 95 trial, RT was omitted for the first time in patients achieving anatomic CR after OEPA-COPP chemotherapy. In contrast to patients with low-risk disease, patients with intermediate- and advanced-stage disease and CR showed a significantly lower 10-year progression-free survival (PFS) than patients who did not achieved CR and therefore received IFRT [21]. In conclusion, assessment by anatomic response at completion of chemotherapy was not adequate to identify patients in whom RT can be spared without increasing the risk of relapse. In the following EuroNet-PHL-C1 study, RT was omitted in patients whose PET scans were negative after two initial intensified OE*PA cycles. Preliminary data suggest that this strategy is feasible to identify patients to have good long-term survival without RT.
The reader is also referred to the Chaps. 39, 40 of this book.
1.4 Standardizing the Definitions for FDG-PET Imaging for Initial Staging and Response Assessment
Functional FDG-PET imaging was increasingly used in Hodgkin’s lymphoma already in the 1990s, and it is now routinely used in most centers. FDG-PET can image the entire body detecting peripheral metastatic lesions and more lesions than detected by CT/MRI. It can also better distinguish between vital and fibrotic/necrotic residual masses. This may have impact on disease stage and thus treatment intensity for some patients. FDG-PET images are currently interpreted visually, which is subject to high intraobserver variability [36] and should therefore be centrally reviewed within a clinical trial for quality assurance. FDG-PET-guided response adaption is increasingly used, but evaluation may differ by study groups. For the current EuroNet-PHL C2 trial, the definition for PET response was changed to a higher threshold for PET positivity with the aim to omit RT in more than 50% of all patients. Figure 22.1 shows FDG PET scan at initial staging and response assessment.
1.5 New Agents
New drugs have been studied in patients with relapsed of refractory HL and showed so far promising results for brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab [37]. Bretuximab vedotin has already been introduced into first-line-treatment in adults and children with advanced disease [38, 39] with the aim to further reduce the number of patients who require RT. Long-term effect caused by new agents are not yet clear and need to be carefully monitored.
2 Late Effects of Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Childhood and Adolescence
Long-term survivors of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma are at risk for a wide range of late effects [40], with second malignant neoplasm and cardiovascular diseases being the leading causes of death in these patients [41]. The excess risks remain significantly elevated decades after treatment and are clearly associated with extent of treatment exposures. With adoption of new agents and contemporary treatment techniques in the evolution of HL-treatment, late effect risks need to be further monitored and follow-up recommendations continuously updated.
2.1 Second Malignancy
Pediatric HL survivors have an excess risk of a solid second malignancy that is clearly associated with RT and persists after treatment. Cumulative incidence increased up to 23.5% at 30 years [33, 42, 43]. Breast cancer is the most common solid second malignancy followed by thyroid cancer. Other second malignancies include tumors of the bone/connective tissue and esophagus; colorectal, lung, and gastric cancers; and melanoma at a younger age than expected in the general population, necessitating ongoing surveillance of this high-risk population Modern diagnostics, i.e., liquid biopsy, are currently under evaluation and may facilitate screening procedures in the future.
The reader is also referred to Chap. 14 of this book.
2.2 Cardiovascular Disease
HL survivors have a significant risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) [34, 35]; both radiotherapy involving the heart and chemotherapy containing anthracyclines can increase the risk. Radiation-induced CVD includes coronary artery disease, valvular heart disease, myocardial dysfunction, electrical conduction abnormalities, and pericardial disease. Anthracyclines may, depending on the cumulative dose, lead to both acute cardiomyopathy and chronic cardiac conditions, especially congestive heart failure (CHF) [34, 35, 44,45,46]. Subclinical disease may be frequent, and sudden cardiac death due to silent coronary artery disease has been described [47]. HL survivors aged 50 will experience more than two times the number of chronic cardiovascular health conditions and nearly 5 times the number of more severe cardiovascular conditions compared to the general population. On average, HL survivors at risk have one severe, life-threatening, or fatal cardiovascular condition [48]. HL survivors were 4.4 times and 6.7 times more at risk of ischemic heart disease and cardiomyopathy/heart failure death, respectively, than expected [49]. HL survivors with radiation to the cervical or mantle region may also seem at risk to develop cerebrovascular disease such as premature carotid stenosis, transient ischemic attack, and stroke [50,51,52].
The reader is also referred to Chap. 1 of this book.
2.3 Pulmonary Dysfunction
Radiation to the lung appears to have the most significant impact upon the lung; survivors can develop chronic pulmonary conditions such as chronic cough, oxygen need, lung fibrosis, and recurrent pneumonia. Compared to their siblings, patients after lung irradiation with 15 to ≤25 Gy have a 6.2–11.0 increased risk to develop lung fibrosis and a 2.9–3.1 increased risk for recurrent pneumonia [53].
The reader is also referred to Chap. 6 of this book.
2.4 Endocrinopathies
2.4.1 Fertility Impairment
RT and chemotherapy can both have an effect on the fertility of men and women, depending upon RT dose and cumulative dose of chemotherapy. In men, radiation doses of ≤1.2 Gy are associated with a reduced chance of recovery of spermatogenesis. In women treated at age 15–40 years, ovarian doses of 2.5–5 Gy will lead to permanent ovarian failure in 30–40% [54]. The risk for infertility after chemotherapy depends on the cumulative dose of alkylating agents. In men, procarbazine causes a high and dose-related incidence of testicular dysfunction in prepubertal as well as in pubertal boys affecting Leydig cell function and spermatogenesis, mostly resulting in azoospermia [28]. Woman appear to be less affected [55] but are at risk for premature ovarian insufficiency [56, 57].
The reader is also referred to the Chaps. 9, 10, 12 of this book.
2.4.2 Thyroid Dysfunction
Long-term risk in pediatric HL survivors to develop hypothyroidism can be 40% or higher after RT to the neck region [40, 58]. The risk of hypothyroidism after RT is dose related. Adult HL patients showed a risk of 70.8% to develop hypothyroidism, if the thyroid gland volume receiving 30 Gy was greater than 62.5% [54].
The reader is also referred to Chap. 8 of this book.
2.5 Other Late Effects
Fatigue is common after HL and local atrophy of muscle and connective tissue may occur. An increased risk of diabetes has been described [54]. Patients after splenectomy for staging are at risk for severe infections [59].
3 Recommendation for Follow-Up Exams After Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Childhood and Adolescence
Lifelong regular follow-up exams according to the risk given by the individual treatment are recommended as given in Table 22.2. Recent evidence-based follow-up recommendations by organ at risk can be reviewed at www.ighg.org, at the homepage of the Children’s Oncology Group (COG) (http://www.survivorshipguidelines.org/) and at the LESS group homepage (www.nachsorge-ist-vorsorge.de) in Germany.
4 Psychosocial Follow-Up
The reader is also referred to the guidelines prepared by the PSAPOH (Psychosoziale Arbeitsgruppe in der Pädiatrischen Onkologie und Hämatologie) for the psychosocial care of childhood and adolescent cancer patients, even if the main focus is on acute care (www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/025-002.html).
References
Schellong G, et al. Combined treatment strategy in over 200 children with Hodgkin’s disease: graduated chemotherapy, involved field irradiation with low dosage and selective splenectomy. A report of the cooperative therapy study DAL-HD-82. Klin Padiatr [Internet]. 1986;198(3):137–46. [cited 2019 Feb 4].
Weiner MA, et al. Intensive chemotherapy and low-dose radiotherapy for the treatment of advanced-stage Hodgkin’s disease in pediatric patients: a Pediatric Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 1991;9(9):1591–8. [cited 2019 Feb 4].
Hutchinson RJ, et al. MOPP or radiation in addition to ABVD in the treatment of pathologically staged advanced Hodgkin’s disease in children: results of the Children’s Cancer Group Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 1998;16(3):897–906. [cited 2019 Feb 28].
Schellong G, et al. High cure rates and reduced long-term toxicity in pediatric Hodgkin’s disease: the German-Austrian Multicenter Trial DAL-HD-90. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 1999;17(12):3736–44. [cited 2019 Feb 28].
Donaldson SS, et al. Final results of a prospective clinical trial with VAMP and low-dose involved-field radiation for children with low-risk Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2007;25(3):332–7. [cited 2019 Feb 28].
Devita VT, et al. Combination chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced Hodgkin’s disease. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 1970;73(6):881–95.
Smith MA, et al. Secondary leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome after treatment with epipodophyllotoxins. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 1999;17(2):569–77. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Kaatsch P, et al. Second malignant neoplasms after childhood cancer in germany—results from the long-term follow-up of the German Childhood Cancer Registry. Strahlentherapie und Onkol [Internet]. 2009;185(S2):8–10. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Bhatia S, et al. Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin’s disease. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 1996;334(12):745–51. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Schellong G, et al. Breast cancer in young women after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease during childhood or adolescence—an observational study with up to 33-year follow-up. Dtsch Ärzteblatt Int [Internet]. 2014;111(1–2):3–9. [cited 2016 Jul 16].
Kung FH, et al. POG 8625: a randomized trial comparing chemotherapy with chemoradiotherapy for children and adolescents with Stages I, IIA, IIIA1 Hodgkin Disease: a report from the Children’s Oncology Group. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol [Internet]. 2006;28(6):362–8. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Schwartz CL, et al. A risk-adapted, response-based approach using ABVE-PC for children and adolescents with intermediate- and high-risk Hodgkin lymphoma: the results of P9425. Blood [Internet]. 2009;114(10):2051–9. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Schellong G, et al. Zur Bedeutung des Procarbazins in der Chemotherapie des Morbus Hodgkin—Ein Bericht der kooperativen Therapiestudie DAL-HD-85*. Klin Pädiatrie [Internet]. 1988;200(03):205–13. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Mauz-Körholz C, et al. Procarbazine-free OEPA-COPDAC chemotherapy in boys and standard OPPA-COPP in girls have comparable effectiveness in pediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the GPOH-HD-2002 study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2010;28(23):3680–6. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Mauz-Körholz C, et al. Feasibility of VECOPA, a dose-intensive chemotherapy regimen for children and adolescents with intermediate and advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma: results of the GPOH-HD-2002/VECOPA pilot trial. Leuk Lymphoma [Internet]. 2015;56(5):1308–14. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Capra M, et al. Long-term outcome in children with Hodgkin’s lymphoma: the United Kingdom Children’s Cancer Study Group HD82 trial. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2007;43(7):1171–9. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Shankar A, et al. Clinical outcome in children and adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma after treatment with chemotherapy alone—the results of the United Kingdom HD3 national cohort trial. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 2012;48(1):108–13. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Schellong GM. The German cooperative therapy studies. An approach to minimize treatment modalities and invasive staging procedures. Cancer Treat Res [Internet]. 1989;41:277–89. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Schellong G, et al. Treatment of children with Hodgkin’s disease—results of the German Pediatric Oncology Group. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol [Internet]. 1992;3(Suppl 4):73–6. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Dörffel W, et al. Preliminary results of the multicenter trial GPOH-HD 95 for the treatment of Hodgkin’s disease in children and adolescents: analysis and outlook. Klin Padiatr [Internet]. 2013;215(3):139–45. [cited 2019 Mar 4].
Dörffel W, et al. Treatment of children and adolescents with Hodgkin lymphoma without radiotherapy for patients in complete remission after chemotherapy: final results of the multinational trial GPOH-HD95. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2013;31(12):1562–8. [cited 2016 Jul 16].
Vecchi V, et al. Treatment of pediatric Hodgkin disease tailored to stage, mediastinal mass, and age. An Italian (AIEOP) multicenter study on 215 patients. Cancer [Internet]. 1993;72(6):2049–57. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Balwierz W, et al. Over 30-year experience of Polish Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group for treatment of Hodgkin’s disease in children and adolescents: improvement curability and decrease of serious complications. Przegl Lek [Internet]. 2004;61(Suppl 2):33–9. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Landman-Parker J, et al. Localized childhood Hodgkin’s disease: response-adapted chemotherapy with etoposide, bleomycin, vinblastine, and prednisone before low-dose radiation therapy—results of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology Study MDH90. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2000;18(7):1500–7. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Shankar AG, et al. A limited role for VEEP (vincristine, etoposide, epirubicin, prednisolone) chemotherapy in childhood Hodgkin’s disease. Eur J Cancer [Internet]. 1998;34(13):2058–63. [cited 2019 Mar 3].
Castellanos EM, et al. A chemotherapy only therapeutic approach to pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma: AHOPCA LH 1999. Pediatr Blood Cancer [Internet]. 2014;61(6):997–1002. [cited 2019 Mar 4].
Pavlovsky S, et al. Randomized trial of CVPP for three versus six cycles in favorable-prognosis and CVPP versus AOPE plus radiotherapy in intermediate-prognosis untreated Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 1997;15(7):2652–8. [cited 2019 Mar 4].
Brämswig JH, et al. The effects of different cumulative doses of chemotherapy on testicular function. Results in 75 patients treated for Hodgkin’s disease during childhood or adolescence. Cancer [Internet]. 1990;65(6):1298–302. [cited 2016 Jul 16].
Hassel J, et al. Testikuläre Funktion nach OPA/COMP-Chemotherapie ohne Procarbazin bei Jungen mit Morbus Hodgkin. Klin Pädiatrie [Internet]. 1991;203(04):268–72. [cited 2019 Mar 23].
Brämswig JH, et al. The challenge of pediatric Hodgkin’s disease—where is the balance between cure and long-term toxicity?: a report of the West German multicenter studies DAL-HD-78, DAL-HD-82 and DAL-HD-85. Leuk Lymphoma [Internet]. 1990;3(3):183–93. [cited 2019 Mar 23].
Schellong G, et al. Reduzierung der Strahlendosen auf 20–30 Gy im Rahmen einer kombinierten Chemo-/Radiotherapie beim Morbus Hodgkin im Kindesalter. Klin Pädiatrie [Internet]. 1994;206(04):253–62. [cited 2019 Mar 19].
Gerres L, et al. The effects of etoposide on testicular function in boys treated for Hodgkin’s disease. Cancer [Internet]. 1998;83(10):2217–22. [cited 2019 Mar 23].
Wolfgang Dörffel MRHLJBGS. Secondary malignancies following treatment for Hodgkin’s lymphoma in childhood and adolescence: a cohort study with more than 30 years’ follow-up. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(18):320.
Schellong G, et al. Late valvular and other cardiac diseases after different doses of mediastinal radiotherapy for Hodgkin disease in children and adolescents: report from the longitudinal GPOH follow-up project of the German-Austrian DAL-HD studies. Pediatr Blood Cancer [Internet]. 2010;55(6):1145–52. [cited 2016 Jul 16].
Bhakta N, et al. Cumulative burden of cardiovascular morbidity in paediatric, adolescent, and young adult survivors of Hodgkin’s lymphoma: an analysis from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2016;17(9):1325–34. [cited 2017 Jul 18].
Furth C, et al. Evaluation of interim PET response criteria in paediatric Hodgkin’s lymphoma—results for dedicated assessment criteria in a blinded dual-centre read. Ann Oncol [Internet]. 2011;22(5):1198–203. [cited 2019 Mar 21].
Nagpal P, et al. Pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma-biomarkers, drugs, and clinical trials for translational science and medicine. Oncotarget [Internet]. 2016;7(41):67551–73. [cited 2019 Mar 23].
Eichenauer DA, et al. Incorporation of brentuximab vedotin into first-line treatment of advanced classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma: final analysis of a phase 2 randomised trial by the German Hodgkin Study Group. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2017;18(12):1680–7. [cited 2019 Mar 23].
Flerlage JE, et al. The management of Hodgkin lymphoma in adolescents and young adults: burden of disease or burden of choice? Blood [Internet]. 2018;132(4):376–84. [cited 2019 Mar 23].
Dörffel W, et al. Late effects following treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma during childhood and adolescence. results of the Hodgkin lymphoma late effects research project. Klin Pädiatrie [Internet]. 2016;228(06/07):286–93. [cited 2017 Jul 18].
Castellino SM, et al. Morbidity and mortality in long-term survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Blood. 2011;117(6):1806–16. [cited 2019 Mar 24].
Bhatia S, et al. High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin’s disease: report from the Late Effects Study Group. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2003;21(23):4386–94. [cited 2016 Sep 11].
Metayer C, et al. Second cancers among long-term survivors of Hodgkin’s disease diagnosed in childhood and adolescence. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2000;18(12):2435–43. [cited 2016 Sep 11].
Armstrong GT, et al. Comprehensive echocardiographic detection of treatment-related cardiac dysfunction in adult survivors of childhood cancer. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2015;65(23):2511–22. [cited 2017 Jul 18].
Mulrooney DA, et al. Cardiac outcomes in a cohort of adult survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer: retrospective analysis of the childhood cancer survivor study cohort. BMJ. 2009;339(7736):34.
Armstrong GT, et al. Increased tricuspid regurgitant jet velocity by Doppler echocardiography in adult survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2013;31(6):774–81. [cited 2015 Feb 8].
Srivastava D, et al. Coronary artery disease detected by coronary computed tomography angiography in adult survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer. 2014;120(22):3536–44.
Bhakta N, et al. The cumulative burden of surviving childhood cancer: an initial report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study (SJLIFE). Lancet. 2017;390(10112):2569–82.
Reulen RC, et al. Population-based long-term cardiac-specific mortality among 34 489 five-year survivors of childhood cancer in Great Britain. Circulation. 2017;135(10):951–63.
Bright CJ, et al. Risk of cerebrovascular events in 178 962 five-year survivors of cancer diagnosed at 15 to 39 years of age clinical perspective. Circulation [Internet]. 2017;135(13):1194–210. [cited 2017 Jul 18].
Bowers DC, et al. Stroke as a late treatment effect of Hodgkin’s disease: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2005;23(27):6508–15. [cited 2019 Mar 21].
De Bruin ML, et al. Increased risk of stroke and transient ischemic attack in 5-year survivors of Hodgkin lymphoma. J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]. 2009;101(13):928–37. [cited 2019 Mar 21].
Dietz AC, et al. Risk and impact of pulmonary complications in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer [Internet]. 2016;122(23):3687–96. [cited 2017 Jul 18].
Ng AK, van Leeuwen FE. Hodgkin lymphoma: late effects of treatment and guidelines for surveillance. Semin Hematol [Internet]. 2016;53(3):209–15. [cited 2019 Mar 21].
Brämswig JH, et al. Parenthood in adult female survivors treated for Hodgkin’s lymphoma during childhood and adolescence: a prospective, longitudinal study. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2015;16(6):667–75. [cited 2016 Sep 12].
van Dorp W, et al. Recommendations for premature ovarian insufficiency surveillance for female survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer: a report from the international late effects of childhood cancer guideline harmonization group in collaboration with the PanCareSurFup consortium. J Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2016;34(28):3440–50. [cited 2018 Sep 20].
Sklar CA, et al. Premature menopause in survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J Natl Cancer Inst [Internet]. 2006;98(13):890–6. [cited 2019 Mar 24].
Inskip PD, et al. Hypothyroidism following radiation therapy for childhood cancer: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Radiat Res. 2018;190(2):117–32.
Schellong G, Riepenhausen M. Late effects after therapy of Hodgkin’s disease: update 2003/04 on overwhelming post-splenectomy infections and secondary malignancies. Klin PÄdiatrie [Internet]. 2004;216(6):364–9. [cited 2016 Jul 16].
Armenian SH, et al. Recommendations for cardiomyopathy surveillance for survivors of childhood cancer: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2015;16(3):e123–36. [cited 2018 Sep 20].
Children’s Oncology Group. Long-term follow-up guidelines for survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers, version 5.0; 2018.
Dutch Childhood Oncology Group (DCOG)/SKION. Guidelines for follow-up in survivors of childhood cancer 5 years after diagnosis [Internet], vol. 9; 2010. pp. 76–99. https://www.skion.nl/workspace/uploads/vertaling-richtlijn-LATER-versie-final-okt-2014_2.pdf.
Skinner R, et al. Recommendations for gonadotoxicity surveillance in male childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group in collaboration with the PanCareSurFup consortium. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2017;18(2):e75–90. [cited 2018 Sep 20].
Clement SC, et al. Balancing the benefits and harms of thyroid cancer surveillance in survivors of Childhood, adolescent and young adult cancer: Recommendations from the international Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group in collaboration with the PanCareSurFup consortium. Cancer Treat Rev [Internet]. 2018;63:28–39. [cited 2018 Sep 20].
Mulder RL, et al. Recommendations for breast cancer surveillance for female survivors of childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancer given chest radiation: a report from the International Late Effects of Childhood Cancer Guideline Harmonization Group. Lancet Oncol [Internet]. 2013;14(13):e621–9. [cited 2018 Sep 20].
Reulen RC, et al. Long-term risks of subsequent primary neoplasms among survivors of childhood cancer. JAMA [Internet]. 2011;305(22):2311. [cited 2018 Sep 20].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hennewig, U., Körholz, D., Mauz-Körholz, C. (2021). Late Effects After Treatment of Hodgkin Lymphoma in Childhood and Adolescence. In: Beck, J.D., Bokemeyer, C., Langer, T. (eds) Late Treatment Effects and Cancer Survivor Care in the Young. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49140-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49140-6_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49138-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49140-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)