Skip to main content

Integration of Quality Function Deployment with IVIF-AHP and Kano Model for Customer Oriented Product Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Customer Oriented Product Design

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 279))

Abstract

Nowadays, meeting the needs and expectations of customers has become more important to ensure the sustainability of the products in the market. Product designers utilize various methods and approaches to achieve this goal. The most favorable methods for product design are Quality Function Deployment (QFD) and Kano Model. QFD protects products against design errors and reduces customer dissatisfaction by matching customer expectations with technical characteristics of products. Kano Model categorizes product attributes with respect to customer expectations by examining the customer satisfaction levels in the cases of fulfillment and non-fulfillment of attributes. Therefore, in this chapter, an integrated method including QFD, Kano Model and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (IVIF-AHP) is employed for customer oriented product design. Kano Model is embedded into house of quality to define marketing advantage by classifying customer requirements while IVIF-AHP is utilized to determine the importance degrees of customer requirements. The proposed method is applied for laptop design. It is shown that processor, graphic card and battery are selected to be the most important technical characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frizziero, L., Francia, D., Donnici, G., Liverani, A., Caligiana, G.: Sustainable design of open molds with QFD and TRIZ combination. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 35(1), 21–31 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gangurde, S.R., Patil, S.S.: Benchmark product features using the Kano-QFD approach: a case study. Benchmarking: Int. J. 25(2), 450–470 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kang, X., Yang, M., Wu, Y., Ni, B.: Integrating evaluation grid method and fuzzy quality function deployment to new product development. Math. Probl. Eng., Hindawi (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koprivica, S.M., Filipovic, J.: Application of traditional and fuzzy quality function deployment in the product development process. Eng. Manag. J. 30(2), 98–107 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kowalska, M., Pazdzior, M., Krzton-Maziopa, A.: Implementation of QFD method in quality analysis of confectionery products. J. Intell. Manuf. 29, 439–447 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, Y.L., Du, Y.F., Chin, K.S.: Determining the importance ratings of customer requirements in quality function deployment based on interval linguistic information. Int. J. Prod. Res. 56(14), 4692–4708 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Patil, C.K., Husain, M., Halegowda, N.W.: Study of quality function deployment model based on artificial neural network with optimization techniques. J. Adv. Manuf. Syst. 17, 119–136 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu, X., Liao, H.: An approach to quality function deployment based on probabilistic linguistic term sets and ORESTE method for multi-expert multi-criteria decision making. Inf. Fusion 43, 13–26 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dehe, B., Bamford, D.: Quality Function Deployment and operational design decisions – a healthcare infrastructure development case study. Prod. Plan. Control Manag. Oper. 28(14), 1177–1192 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He, L., Song, W., Wu, Z., Xu, Z., Zheng, M., Ming, X.: Quantification and integration of an improved Kano model into QFD based on multi-population adaptive genetic algorithm. Comput. Ind. Eng. 114, 183–194 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Köse, Y., Demirci, E.: Fuzzy quality function deployment approach for selection of mineral water manufacturer companies. Turk. J. Occup./Environ. Med. Saf. 1(3), 465–478 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Režek Jambrak, A., Šimunek, M., Grbeš, F., Mandura, A., Djekic, I.: Analysis of apple beverages treated with high-power ultrasound: a quality function deployment approach. J. Sci. Food Agric. 98, 2258–2266 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vinodh, S., Manjunatheshwara, K.J., Sundaram, S.K., Kirthivasan, V.: Application of fuzzy quality function deployment for sustainable design of consumer electronics products: a case study. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 19, 1021–1030 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, C.H.: Incorporating the concept of systematic innovation into quality function deployment for developing multi-functional smart phones. Comput. Ind. Eng. 107, 367–375 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu, S.M., Liu, H.C., Wang, L.E.: Hesitant fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for quality function deployment: a case study in electric vehicle. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(15), 4436–4449 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadry, H.R., Susanti, L., Rahmayanti, D.: Ergonomics intervention on an alternative design of a spinal board. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 23(3), 393–403 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wood, L.C., Wang, C., Abdul-Rahman, H., Abdul-Nasir, N.S.J.: Green hospital design: integrating quality function deployment and end-user demands. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 903–913 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Murali, S., Pugazhendhi, S., Muralidharan, C.: Integration of IPA and QFD to assess the service quality and to identify after sales service strategies to improve customer satisfaction – a case study. Prod. Plan. Control 27(5), 394–407 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kecek, G., Yüksel, R.: Analitik hiyerarşi süreci (ahp) ve promethee teknikleriyle akıllı telefon seçimi. Sos. Bilim. Derg. 49, 46–63 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chen, C.H., Huang, C.Y.: The synergy of QFD and TRIZ for solving EMC problems in electrical products – a case study for the notebook PC. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 32(5), 311–330 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Choi, I.K., Kim, W.S., Lee, D., Kwon, D.S.: A weighted qfd-based usability evaluation method for elderly in smart cars. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 31(10), 703–716 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fátima Cardoso, J.D., Filho, N.C., Miguel, P.A.C.: Application of quality function deployment for the development of an organic product. Food Qual. Prefer., Braz. 40, 180–190 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ju, Y., Sohn, S.Y.: Patent-based QFD framework development for identification of emerging technologies and related business models: a case of robot technology in Korea. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., Korea, 44–64 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Neyses, B., Sandberg, D.: A new methodology to select hardwood species for wooden products. Wood Mat. Sci. Eng. 10(4), 344–352 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, Y.H., Ho, C.C.: Integration of green quality function deployment and fuzzy theory: a case study on green mobile phone design. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 271–280 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alba-Elías, F., Guerra-Sánchez-De-La-Nieta, Á., Las-Heras-Casas, J., González-Marcos, A., Alfonso-Cendón, J., Castejón-Limas, M.: A new device for dosing additives in the food industry using quality function deployment. J. Food Process. Eng., Spain (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, L.H., Chen, C.N.: Normalisation models for prioritising design requirements for quality function deployment processes. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(2), 299–313 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Han, K., Shin, J.: A systematic way of identifying and forecasting technological reverse salients using QFD, bibliometrics, and trend impact analysis: a carbon nanotube biosensor case. Technovation 34, 559–570 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ji, P., Jin, J., Wang, T., Chen, Y.: Quantification and integration of Kano’s model into QFD for optimising product design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 52(21), 6335–6348 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vinodh, S., Kamala, V., Jayakrishna, K.: Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 2758–2770 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yuen, K.K.F.: A hybrid fuzzy quality function deployment framework using cognitive network process and aggregative grading clustering: an application to cloud software product development. Neurocomputing, China 142, 95–106 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zaim, S., Sevkli, M., Camgöz-Akdağ, H., Demirel, O.F., Yayla, A.Y., Delen, D.: Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Syst. Appl. 41, 4464–4474 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang, F., Yang, M., Liu, W.: Using integrated quality function deployment and theory of innovation problem solving approach for ergonomic product design. Comput. Ind. Eng., China 76, 60–74 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhong, S., Zhou, J., Chen, Y.: Determination of target values of engineering characteristics in QFD using a fuzzy chance-constrained modelling approach. Neurocomputing 142, 125–135 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Du, Y., Cao, H., Chen, X., Wang, B.: Reuse-oriented redesign method of used products based on axiomatic design theory and QFD. J. Clean. Prod. 39, 79–86 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Melemez, K., Gironimo, G.D., Esposito, G., Lanzotti, A.: Concept design in virtual reality of a forestry trailer using a QFD-TRIZ based approach. Turk. J. Agric. For., Turk. 789–801 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nixon, J.D., Dey, P.K., Davies, P.K.: Design of a novel solar thermal collector using a multi-criteria decision-making methodology. J. Clean. Prod. 59, 150–159 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Özçifçi, V., Arsu, T.: Lojistik servis sağlayicisi seçiminde ahp uygulaması. Sos. Ve Beşeri Bilim. Derg. 5(1) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wu, C.T., Pan, T.S., Shao, M.H., Wu, C.S.: An extensive QFD and evaluation procedure for innovative design. Math. Probl. Eng. (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Homkhiew, C., Ratanawilai, T., Pochana, K.: Application of a quality function deployment technique to design and develop furniture products. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 34(6), 663–668 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Oke, S.A.: Manufacturing quality function deployment: literature review and future trends. Eng. J. 17(3), 79–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, C.H., Chen, J.N.: Using quality function deployment for collobrative product design and optimal selection of module mix. Comput. Ind. Eng. 63, 1030–1037 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Uppalanchi, A.: Application of quality function deployment in new product and service development. Masters’ thesis. Missouri University of Science and Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gonza´lez, M.E., Quesada, G., Bahill, A.T.: Improving product design using quality function deployment: the school furniture case in developing countries. Qual. Eng. 16(1), 47–58 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Karsak, E.E., Sozer, S., Alptekin, S.E.: Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 44, 171–190 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Verma, R., Maher, T., Pullman, M.: Effective product and process development using quality function deployment. Integr. Prod. Process. Dev. 339–354 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Cebi, S., Ozkok, M., Demirci, E.: Evaluation of design parameters for vessel engine room by using a modified QFD technique. J. Mult.-Valued Log. Soft Comput. 23(5–6), 559–587 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wu, J., Huang, H.B., Cao, Q.W.: Research on AHP with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application in multi-criteria decision making problems. Appl. Math. Model. 37(24), 9898–9906 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. Kano, N.: Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu (Qual., J. Jpn. Soc. Qual. Control) 14, 39–48 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Shiau, C.S., Tseng, I.H., Heutchy, A.W., Michalek, J.: Design optimization of a laptop computer using aggregate and mixed logit demand models with consumer survey data. In: ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (pp. 175–185). American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kogure, M., Akao, Y.: Quality function deployment and CWQC in Japan. Qual. Prog. 10/1983, 16(10), 25–29 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merve Ozalp .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ozalp, M., Kucukbas, D., Ilbahar, E., Cebi, S. (2020). Integration of Quality Function Deployment with IVIF-AHP and Kano Model for Customer Oriented Product Design. In: Kahraman, C., Cebi, S. (eds) Customer Oriented Product Design. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 279. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42188-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics