Abstract
The developing human brain possesses a superior potential of functional reorganization after lesions compared with the adult brain. Because of such reorganizational processes, children with early brain lesions often show abnormally located cortical representations of certain brain functions, e.g. of motor representations (Carr et al., Brain 116:1223–1247, 1993; Staudt et al., Brain 125:2222–2237, 2002; Staudt et al., Ann Neurol 56:854–863, 2004) or of language functions (Rasmussen and Milner, Ann N Y Acad Sci 30:355–369, 1977; Staudt et al., Neuroimage 16:954–967, 2002). Nowadays, these abnormally located representations can be identified non-invasively using techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (fMRI), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or magnetoencephalography (MEG). Thus, these techniques not only can contribute to our general understanding of the processes involved in the reorganization of the developing human brain but can also be used clinically in the pre-surgical evaluation of children who have to undergo brain surgery, e.g. for the relief of pharmaco-refractory epilepsies originating from their lesions (Hertz-Pannier et al., Childs Nerv Syst 17:223–228, 2001; Staudt et al., Neuropediatrics 32:159–161, 2001; Staudt et al., Ann Neurol 56:854–863, 2004; Staudt et al., J Neurosurg 101:69–77, 2004; Liégeois et al., J Magn Reson Imaging 23:933–940, 2006).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
The developing human brain possesses a superior potential of functional reorganization after lesions compared with the adult brain. Because of such reorganizational processes, children with early brain lesions often show abnormally located cortical representations of certain brain functions, e.g. of motor representations (Carr et al. 1993; Staudt et al. 2002a, 2004a) or of language functions (Rasmussen and Milner 1977; Staudt et al. 2002b). Nowadays, these abnormally located representations can be identified non-invasively using techniques such as functional MRI (fMRI) , transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or magnetoencephalography (MEG) . Thus, these techniques not only can contribute to our general understanding of the processes involved in the reorganization of the developing human brain but can also be used clinically in the pre-surgical evaluation of children who have to undergo brain surgery, e.g. for the relief of pharmaco-refractory epilepsies originating from their lesions (Hertz-Pannier et al. 2001; Staudt et al. 2001, 2004a, b; Liégeois et al. 2006).
The clinical application of these mapping techniques in this context is particularly challenging: first, most of these patients are children, often with various degrees of cognitive impairments so that their ability to comply with the experimental requirements is often reduced; second, the brain lesions often destroy or distort anatomical landmarks, which can normally be used for the identification of eloquent brain regions; and third, the cortical representations of brain functions may have shifted because of reorganizational processes following lesions acquired during ongoing brain development. This chapter gives typical examples of examinations of children, mostly in the pre-surgical evaluation before epilepsy surgery, highlighting a number of important aspects.
2 Example 1
A 3-year-old boy suffered from therapy-refractory focal seizures originating from a cortical dysplasia (yellow arrows in Fig. 11.1) in the central (Rolandic) region of the right hemisphere. On clinical examination, left-hand function was normal. Prior to possible epilepsy surgery, fMRI during a simple active hand motor task (repetitive squeezing of a toy) was used to visualize the spatial relation between the dysplasia and the primary sensorimotor representation of the contralateral hand.
Based on these findings of fMRI activation in the immediate vicinity of the dysplasia , no total resection of the dysplasia was performed.
fMRI can be used even in pre-school children to localize the primary sensorimotor region (S1M1) in the vicinity of epileptogenic lesions.
3 Example 2
A 16-year-old girl with congenital hemiparesis due to a perinatally acquired cortico-subcortical infarct in the territory of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) showed a striking discrepancy between a large cystic lesion and relatively well-preserved sensorimotor functions (preserved grasp) of the contralateral (paretic) hand (Staudt et al. 2006b). On neurophysiological examination, TMS revealed preserved crossed cortico-spinal projections from the affected hemisphere to the paretic hand, and MEG identified the first cortical response to repetitive tactile stimulation of the paretic thumb (N20m) in the affected hemisphere, indicating the presence of preserved crossed spino-thalamocortical somatosensory projections. Accordingly, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography with a seed region positioned in the small bridge of preserved white matter between the enlarged lateral ventricle and the cystic lesion visualized extensive connectivity provided by this area (Fig. 11.2).
Small areas of preserved white matter can provide surprisingly extensive connectivity in patients with early brain lesions. Such projections can be visualized by DTI tractography.
4 Example 3
A 20-year-old young man with congenital right hemiparesis due to a large polymicrogyria in the left frontoparietal region shows partially preserved sensorimotor functions (preserved individual finger movements) of the contralateral (paretic) right hand (Staudt et al. 2004b). On neurophysiological examination, TMS revealed preserved crossed cortico-spinal projections from the affected hemisphere to the paretic hand. Accordingly, fMRI during a simple active hand motor task (repetitive opening/closing of the paretic hand) revealed activation in the polymicrogyric cortex. Thus, both TMS and fMRI demonstrate that, in this patient, the polymicrogyric cortex harbours the primary motor representation of the paretic hand (Fig. 11.3).
Dysgenic cortex (here: polymicrogyria) can fulfil primary motor functions, with normal descending corticospinal motor projections. This can be confirmed by a combination of fMRI and TMS.
5 Example 4
A 6-year-old boy with congenital right hemiparesis due to a complex hemispheric malformation suffered from pharmaco-refractory seizures (Staudt et al. 2001). Clinical examination showed preserved individual finger movements in the paretic hand and massive mirror movements during voluntary movements of both the paretic and the non-paretic hand. Prior to epilepsy surgery, fMRI and TMS were performed to identify the primary motor representation of the paretic hand. TMS of the affected hemisphere did not elicit any response, whereas TMS of the contra-lesional hemisphere elicited bilateral responses with similar latencies. This indicated the presence of fast-conducting ipsilateral cortico-spinal projections, allowing the contra-lesional hemisphere to exert motor control over the paretic hand. Accordingly, fMRI during a simple active hand motor task (repetitive opening/closing of the paretic hand) revealed activation in the ‘hand knob’ area of the contra-lesional hemisphere, not different from the fMRI activation elicited by movements of the non-paretic hand . Active grasping was still possible after functional hemispherectomy (Fig. 11.4).
Early brain lesions (malformations but also defective lesions) can induce shifting of the primary motor representation (M1) of the paretic hand to the contra-lesional hemisphere (with ipsilateral cortico-spinal tracts).
6 Example 5
A 19-year-old woman with congenital right hemiparesis due to a large unilateral periventricular brain lesion showed preserved individual finger movements in the paretic hand and massive mirror movements during voluntary movements of both the paretic and the non-paretic hand (Staudt et al. 2006a). As in the patient in Example 4, TMS of the affected hemisphere did not elicit any response, but TMS of the contra-lesional hemisphere elicited bilateral responses with similar latencies. This indicated the presence of ipsilateral cortico-spinal projections, allowing the contra-lesional hemisphere to exert motor control over the paretic hand. Accordingly, fMRI during a simple active hand motor task (active opening/closing of the paretic hand) revealed not only activation in the ‘hand knob’ area of the contra-lesional hemisphere but also activation in the contralateral Rolandic region, an area from which no motor-evoked potentials could be elicited by TMS. fMRI during passive hand movement also elicited activation in the contralateral Rolandic region (i.e. of the affected hemisphere), suggesting preserved somatosensory functions in this region. And indeed, MEG recorded the first cortical response to repetitive tactile stimulation of the paretic thumb (N20m) in the contralateral Rolandic region, confirming this region to harbour the primary somatosensory representation (S1) of the paretic hand. Finally, DTI with a seed region in the dorsal brainstem (tegmentum pontis) visualized ascending spino-thalamocortical projections bypassing the lesion on their way to this preserved somatosensory representation of the paretic hand. This observation can be explained by the fact that developing thalamocortical somatosensory projections had not yet reached their cortical target areas by the time of the insult (the early third trimester of pregnancy; Kostovic and Judas 2002) so that these outgrowing fibres could find an alternative route in the preserved tissue, thus forming ‘axonal bypasses’ around the defective areas (Staudt et al. 2006a).
This example and similar cases (Thickbroom et al. 2001; Staudt et al. 2006a) teach important lessons for the application of non-invasive imaging techniques in children with early brain lesions:
-
1.
Different mechanisms are available for the reorganization of primary motor and primary somatosensory representations (shifting to the contra-lesional hemisphere for motor functions, forming axonal bypasses around a lesion for somatosensory functions).
-
2.
This can lead to a ‘hemispheric dissociation’ between the primary motor (M1) and the primary somatosensory (S1) representations of a paretic hand.
-
3.
fMRI of passive hand movement alone is not suited to identify the ‘sensorimotor representation’ of a paretic hand (see Fig. 11.5); the reorganization of the primary motor representation in Example 5 would have been missed with the ‘normal-looking’ result for passive hand movement!
7 Example 6
A 7-year-old girl with right-hemispheric polymicrogyria showed congenital hemiparesis (with preserved grasp function of the paretic hand) and pharmaco-refractory epilepsy, so that a surgical disconnection of the malformed right hemisphere (hemispherotomy) for the relief of the epilepsy was considered. TMS and fMRI showed exactly the same constellation as in the patient in Example 5, so that the phenomenon of ‘M1-S1-dissociation’ was apparently present in this girl as well, with a reorganized primary motor (M1) representation of the paretic hand in the contra-lesional (ipsilateral) hemisphere and a contralateral primary somatosensory representation (S1) of the paretic hand in the polymicrogyria. Accordingly, color-coded fractional anisotropy (DTI) of the pons revealed symmetrical ascending tracts in the tegmentum (including the medial lemniscus carrying the somatosensory projections), while in the basis pontis, cortico-spinal projections were only seen in the contra-lesional side of the brainstem. And as predicted by this pattern (Küpper et al. 2016), when hemispherotomy was performed, the girl showed preserved grasp function but reduced tactile discrimination with her paretic hand.
8 Conclusions
Non-invasive mapping techniques such as fMRI, TMS, MEG and DTI tractography are useful techniques in the pre-surgical diagnostic workup of children with early brain lesions. These situations often require a combined use of complementary techniques.
The combination of fMRI (during active movements) and TMS is well suited to identify motor representations, with TMS being specific for areas from where cortico-spinal projections originate and fMRI visualizing the entire sensorimotor network with a high spatial resolution in three dimensions (Thickbroom et al. 2001; Staudt et al. 2002a, 2004a, b). This is important for the identification of (a) the spatial relation between M1 and an epileptogenic lesion (as in Example 1; Fig. 11.1), (b) a preserved M1 in dysgenic cortex (as in Example 3; Fig. 11.3) and (c) a reorganization of M1 into the contra-lesional hemisphere (as in Examples 4, 5, and 6; Figs. 11.4, 11.5 and 11.6). In this respect, patients with a ‘hemispheric dissociation’ between M1 and S1 (Thickbroom et al. 2001; Staudt et al. 2006a) are particularly challenging since, here, fMRI of active hand movements typically yields bilateral Rolandic activation.
The combination of fMRI (during passive movements) and MEG is well suited to identify somatosensory representations, with MEG (due to its high temporal resolution) being specific for primary somatosensory representations (i.e. the cortical projection areas of somatosensory fibres) and fMRI visualizing the somatosensory network with a high spatial resolution in three dimensions (Staudt et al. 2006a; Wilke et al. 2008). Similar to the motor system, this combination can identify (a) preserved somatosensory projections in preserved white-matter bridges (as in Example 2; Fig. 11.2), (b) a preserved S1 in Rolandic cortex overlying even large lesions (as in Example 5; Fig. 11.5) and (c) a preserved S1 in dysgenic cortex (as in example 6; Fig. 11.6).
DTI tractography can visualize preserved projections in the vicinity of a lesion (as in Example 2; Fig. 11.2) or ‘axonal bypasses’ around a lesion (as in Example 5; Fig. 11.5). Because of the uncertainties involved in this new technique, we still recommend to use such information only when additional evidence (e.g. neurophysiological evidence from TMS or MEG) for the existence of such projections is available. Finally, DTI fractional anisotropy maps of the brainstem, when showing marked asymmetries of the cortico-spinal tracts in the basis pontis, help to predict preserved grasp function of the paretic hand after hemispherotomies (Küpper et al. 2016).
References
Carr LJ, Harrison LM et al (1993) Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Brain 116:1223–1247
Hertz-Pannier L, Chiron C et al (2001) Functional imaging in the work-up of childhood epilepsy. Childs Nerv Syst 17:223–228
Kostovic I, Judas M (2002) Correlation between the sequential ingrowth of afferents and transient patterns of cortical lamination in preterm infants. Anat Rec 267:1–6
Küpper H, Kudernatsch M, Pieper T, Groeschel S, Tournier JD, Raffelt D, Winkler P, Holthausen H, Staudt M (2016) Predicting hand function after hemidisconnection: a study on 102 patients. Brain 139:2456–2468
Liégeois F, Cross JH et al (2006) Role of fMRI in the decision-making process: epilepsy surgery for children. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:933–940
Rasmussen T, Milner B (1977) The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 30:355–369
Staudt M, Pieper T et al (2001) Functional MRI in a 6-year-old boy with unilateral cortical malformation: concordant representation of both hands in the unaffected hemisphere. Neuropediatrics 32:159–161
Staudt M, Grodd W et al (2002a) Two types of ipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: a TMS and fMRI study. Brain 125:2222–2237
Staudt M, Lidzba K et al (2002b) Right-hemispheric organization of language following early left-sided brain lesions: functional MRI topography. Neuroimage 16:954–967
Staudt M, Gerloff C et al (2004a) Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol 56:854–863
Staudt M, Krägeloh-Mann I et al (2004b) Searching for motor functions in dysgenic cortex: a clinical TMS and fMRI study. J Neurosurg 101:69–77
Staudt M, Braun C et al (2006a) Developing somatosensory projections bypass periventricular brain lesions. Neurology 67:522–525
Staudt M, Erb M et al (2006b) Extensive peri-lesional connectivity in congenital hemiparesis. Neurology 66:771
Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML et al (2001) Differences in sensory and motor cortical organization following brain injury early in life. Ann Neurol 49:320–327
Wilke M, Staudt M et al (2008) Somatosensory system in two types of motor reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: topography & function. Hum Brain Mapp 30:776–788
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Staudt, M. (2020). Multimodal Brain Mapping in Patients with Early Brain Lesions. In: Ulmer, S., Jansen, O. (eds) fMRI. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41874-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41874-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41873-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41874-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)