Abstract
A comprehensive coverage starts with a clear view on the three sources of energy for generating electricity. Two of them, fossil and atomic fuels, are converted in hot gases or steam, needing cumbersome and wasteful processes. By skipping this mess, harvested renewable currents (wind, light, and water) conquer a central position in the transition to a low-carbon future. Knowing highlights of eighty-year nuclear history is prerequisite for apprehending today’s position of nuclear power, shielded by peculiar nuclear advocacy. The sustainability degree of nuclear power is assessed on criteria helpful for measuring performance in politics, planet, prosperity, people, and risk as fundamental dimensions. Except for low-carbon, nuclear power fails on all criteria. Nuclear proponents gloss over the essential criteria by magnifying low-carbon. The advocacy is simultaneously secret and vocal. In aggregated power systems, harvesting renewable currents and nuclear power deliver incompatible power supplies. NP ruins the business model of wind and PV, and vice versa, depending on assigned priority in consecutive real-time load stackings.
NP is financially very expensive, without accounting costs of decommissioning, waste management, associated risks of nuclear accidents, and weaponry proliferation. Similar conditions apply on announced small modular reactors, revival of failed breeders, high-temperature reactors, etc. (GEN4), and fusion (GEN5). On top of NP’s societal hazards and risks, climate change itself implies additional risks for NP. The protracting quest for the NP utopia is deleterious for sustainability.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker S (2012) The common good and the promotion of sustainable development. In: Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O, Ruud A (eds) Governance, democracy and sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 249–271
Barkatullah N, Ahmad A (2017) Current status and emerging trends in financing nuclear power projects. Energ Strat Rev 18:127–140
BP (2021) Statistical review of world energy. BP p.l.c, London
Bradford P (2012) The nuclear landscape. Nature 483:151–152
Bradford P (2013) How to close the US nuclear industry: do nothing. Bull At Sci 69:12–21
Breyer Ch, Birkner Ch, Kersten F, et al (2010) Research and development investments in PV – a limiting factor for a fast pv diffusion? Valencia
Bunn M, Malin MB, Roth N, Tobey WH (2016) Preventing nuclear terrorism. Continuous improvement or dangerous decline? Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge
Burness HS, Montgomery WD, Quirk JP (1980) The turnkey era in nuclear power. Land Econ 56:188
Cochran TB, Feiveson HA, Mian Z et al (2010) It’s time to give up on breeder reactors. Bull At Sci 66:50–56
Cohn S (1990) The political economy of nuclear power (1945–1990): the rise and fall of an official technology. J Econ Issues 24:781–811
Davis LW (2012) Prospects for nuclear power. J Econ Perspect 26:49–66
Davis G, Goldemberg J (eds) (2012) Global energy assessment: toward a sustainable future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Drupady IM (2019) Emerging nuclear vendors in the newcomer export market: strategic considerations. J World Energy Law Bus 12:4–20
Fuchs DA (2007) Business power in global governance. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder
Gamson WA, Modigliani A (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. Am J Sociol 95:1–37
Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W, Sasson T (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annu Rev Sociol 18:373–393
Garren SJ, Brinkmann R (2018) Sustainability definitions, historical context, and frameworks. In: Brinkmann R, Garren SJ (eds) The Palgrave handbook of sustainability. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–18
Gaßner H, Buchholz G (2017) Haftung für einen Atomunfall im europäischen Ausland. [Gaßner, Groth, Siederer & Coll.] Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwälten mbB, Berlin
Gibson RB, Hassan S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G (2005) Sustainability assessment: criteria and processes and applications. Earthscan, London
Green D (2016) How change happens. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Gronlund L, Lochbaum D, Lyman E (2007) Nuclear power in warming world: assessing the risks, addressing the challenges. Union of Concerned Scientists, Cambridge, MA
Grubler A (2010) The costs of the French nuclear scale-up: a case of negative learning by doing. Energy Policy 38:5174–5188
Haas R, Mez L, Ajanovic A (2019a) The technological and economic future of nuclear power. Springer VS, Berlin/Heidelberg
Haas R, Thomas S, Ajanovic A (2019b) The historical development of the costs of nuclear power. In: Haas R, Mez L, Ajanovic A (eds) The technological and economic future of nuclear power. Springer VS, pp 97–116
Hultman N, Koomey J (2013) Three Mile Island: the driver of US nuclear power’s decline? Bull At Sci 69:63–70
IAEA (2008) Guidance for the application of an assessment methodology for innovative nuclear energy systems. INPRO manual – overview of the methodology. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna
IEA (2012) Energy technology perspectives 2012 – pathways to a clean energy system. International Energy Agency, Paris
IPCC (2011) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation – summary for policymakers and technical summary. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. IPCC, Geneva
IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5°C. IPCC, New York
IRENA (2020) Renewable power generation costs in 2019. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi
IRENA (2021) Renewable power generation costs in 2020. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi
Jacques PJ, Dunlap RE, Freeman M (2008) The organisation of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental Scepticism. Environ Polit 17:349–385
Jassby D (2018) ITER is a showcase … for the drawbacks of fusion energy. Bull At Sci. https://thebulletin.org/2018/02/iter-is-a-showcase-for-the-drawbacks-of-fusion-energy/
JCER (2019) Accident cleanup costs rising to 35 80 trillion yen in 40 years. Japan Center for Economic Research, Tokyo
Jenkins LM, Alvarez R, Jordaan SM (2020) Unmanaged climate risks to spent fuel from U.S. nuclear power plants: the case of sea-level rise. Energy Policy 137:111106
Joskow PL, Parsons JE (2012) The future of nuclear power after Fukushima. Econ Energy Environ Policy 1:99–113
Kåberger T (2019) Economic management of future nuclear accidents. In: Haas R, Mez L, Ajanovic A (eds) The technological and economic future of nuclear power. Springer VS, pp 211–220
Koomey J, Hultman NE (2007) A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970–2005. Energy Policy 35:5630–5642
Koomey J, Hultman NE, Grubler A (2017) A reply to “Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors”. Energy Policy 102:640–643
Kopytko N, Perkins J (2011) Climate change, nuclear power, and the adaptation–mitigation dilemma. Energy Policy 39:318–333
Lakoff G (2010) Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environ Commun 4:70–81
Lévêque F (2014) The economics and uncertainties of nuclear power. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Lovering JR, Yip A, Nordhaus T (2016) Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy 91:371–382
Lovins AB (1976) Energy strategy: the road not taken? Foreign Aff 6:9–19
Meadowcroft J (2012) Pushing the boundaries: governance for sustainable development and a politics of limits. In: Meadowcroft J, Langhelle O, Ruud A (eds) Governance, Democracy and Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar, pp 249–271
MIT (2003) The future of nuclear power. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
Patterson W (1986) Chernobyl: worst but not first. Bull At Sci 42:43–45
Pistner C, Englert M, Küppers C et al (2021) Sicherheitstechnische Analyse und Risikobewertung einer Anwendung von SMR-Konzepten (Small modular reactors). Öko-Institut e.V, Darmstadt
Ramana MV (2021) Small modular and advanced nuclear reactors: a reality check. IEEE Access 9:42090–42099
Rose DJ (1974) Nuclear eclectic power. Science 184:351–359
Schwartz SI (1995) Atomic audit: what the U.S. nuclear arsenal has cost. Brookings Rev 13:14–17
Thomas S (1988) The realities of nuclear power: international economic and regulatory experience. Cambridge University Press
Thomas S (2017) China’s nuclear export drive: Trojan horse or Marshall plan? Energy Policy 101:683–691
Ullmann JE (1958) Economics of nuclear power. Science 128:95–96
UN (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations, New York City
UNFCCC (2015) Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris
University of Chicago (2004) The economic future of nuclear power. University of Chicago, Chicago
Verbruggen A (1982) A system model of combined heat and power generation in district heating. Resour Energy 4:231–263
Verbruggen A (2008) Renewable and nuclear power: a common future? Energy Policy 36:4036–4047
Verbruggen A (2021) Pricing carbon emissions. Economic reality and utopia. Routledge, Abingdon/New York
Verbruggen A, Laes E (2015) Sustainability assessment of nuclear power: discourse analysis of IAEA and IPCC frameworks. Environ Sci Pol 51:170–180
Verbruggen A, Laes E, Lemmens S (2014) Assessment of the actual sustainability of nuclear fission power. Renew Sust Energ Rev 32:16–28
VFL (2011) Berechnung einer risikoadäquaten Versicherungsprämie zur Deckung der Haftpflichtrisiken, die aus dem Betrieb von Kernkraftwerken resultieren. Versicherungsforen Leipzig, Leipzig
Walker JS (2005) Three Mile Island: a nuclear crisis in historical perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley
WCED (1987) Our common future. United Nations, New York City
Wealer B, Bauer S, Landry N et al (2018) Nuclear power reactors worldwide – technology developments, diffusion patterns, and country-by-country analysis of implementation (1951–2017). DIW Berlin, TU Berlin, Berlin
Wealer B, Seidel JP, von Hirschhausen C (2019) Decommissioning of nuclear power plants and storage of nuclear waste: experiences from Germany, France, and the U.K. In: Haas R, Mez L, Ajanovic A (eds) The technological and economic future of nuclear power. Springer VS, pp 261–286
Wealer B, Bauer S, von Hirschhausen C et al (2021a) Investing into third generation nuclear power plants – review of recent trends and analysis of future investments using Monte Carlo simulation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 143:110836
Wealer B, von Hirschhausen C, Kemfert C et al (2021b) Ten years after Fukushima: nuclear energy is still dangerous and unreliable. DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, Berlin
Weinberg AM (1971) Nuclear energy a prelude to H. G. Wells’ dream. Foreign Aff 49:407–418
Weiss L (2003) Atoms for peace. Bull At Sci 59:34–44
WNISR (2019) World nuclear industry status report 2019. Mycle Schneider Consulting, Paris/London
WNISR (2020) World nuclear industry status report 2020. Mycle Schneider Consulting, Paris
WNWR (2019) The world nuclear waste report. Focus Europe, Berlin/Brussels
Wolin SS (2008) Democracy incorporated managed democracy and the specter of inverted totalitarianism. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wood T, Johnson W, Parker B (2001) Economic globalization and a nuclear renaissance. Pacific Northwest Lab, Richland
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Verbruggen, A., Wealer, B. (2021). Nuclear Power and Sustainability. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_15-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38948-2_15-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-38948-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences