Abstract
Many carcinogenic chemicals, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, present in combustion products and tobacco smoke, enter cells as procarcinogens and require metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes to exert their deleterious effects, including binding to DNA and formation of DNA adducts which, if not repaired, may lead to mutations in critical genes and cancer initiation. The induction of oxygen radical damage is considered the main mechanism of particle and metal carcinogenesis. In workplace air many carcinogens exist as complex mixtures, in which chemical compounds are bound to metal and mineral particles of respirable size. In lung cells, the components of complex mixtures induce oxidative stress as well as activation of chemical procarcinogens via intermingled pathways that may potentiate the DNA damage caused by either particle or chemical carcinogen alone. Carcinogenic metals are thought to induce oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage. Recent studies have shown that carcinogenic metals may replace metal ions, such as iron and zinc, in critical enzymes involved in DNA repair, histone methylation, and hypoxic signaling, for example. Epigenetic carcinogenic mechanisms have recently been found to play a larger role than previously thought, in environmental carcinogenesis.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Occupational lung cancer
- Pulmonary carcinogenesis
- PAH
- Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
- Oxygen radical damage
- Reactive oxygen species
- Chromosomal aberrations
- Epigenetic changes
- Carcinogenic metals
- Involuntary tobacco smoking
- Arsenic
- Beryllium
- Cadmium
- Chromium
- Nickel
- Ionizing radiation
Introduction
Inhaled carcinogenic chemicals, mineral fibers and particulates, and carcinogenic metals are the most significant occupational and environmental causes of lung cancer. The gases, fumes, and particulates in industrial environments form complex mixtures, the carcinogenic potential of which may differ from that of each component separately. Particulate matter can absorb chemicals on its surface, which is thought to enhance the deposition of chemicals in the lung, their penetration into lung cells, and carcinogenic action. Personal or involuntary tobacco smoking complicates the exposures even further, since tobacco smoke is also a complex mixture containing carcinogenic agents in chemical and particulate forms.
The carcinogenicity of inhaled substances is influenced not only by their chemical composition, but also by their retention and biopersistence in the lung. The pulmonary deposition and clearance of inhaled particles and fibers are dependent on particle size and dimension. Particles of 10 μm or more in diameter are deposited in the upper airways, whereas those around 1 μm or less in diameter are most effectively retained in the alveolar lung. As an example, inhalation of silver nanoparticles of 20 nm in diameter resulted in a greater lung burden and persistence than larger nanoparticles in animal experiments [1]. Fibrous particles such as asbestos fibers are exceptional in their deposition and clearance, and asbestos fibers up to over 100 μm in length can be found in lung tissue. Inhaled particles and fibers are cleared from the lungs via lymphatics and mucociliary transport. Poorly soluble particles and fibers, which are retained in the lung, form a constant source of toxic damage.
The mechanisms and markers of asbestos carcinogenesis are reviewed in Chaps. 11 and 12. The present Chap. 13 handles pulmonary carcinogens other than asbestos. For more detailed information, the reader is referred to several recent comprehensive reviews cited in this chapter.
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Complex Mixtures
Occupational Exposure to Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) arise in the incomplete combustion of fossil and carbonaceous materials and also occur in crude oil deposits. The highest occupational exposures are found in petrochemical industry workers, especially in coke-oven workers, and in workers of metal plants and foundries [2]. Sources of indoor PAH exposure include tobacco smoke, meat and fish roasting and frying, and charcoal grilling in poorly ventilated environments [3]. Examples of occupations with PAH exposure are given in Table 13.1. Workers in the petrochemical industry and in foundries are typically exposed to complex mixtures, in which chemical compounds are bound to metal and mineral particulates of respirable size. Some of these metals and minerals are known or suspected lung carcinogens as such; examples include arsenic, some chromium and nickel compounds, cadmium, vanadium, silica, and fibrous minerals including asbestos. PAH levels and the distribution of different PAH compounds between gaseous and particulate phases have been studied in air samples from foundries. While the gas phase contains on average three times more carcinogenic four- and five-ring PAHs, the total PAH load increases with increasing particle size in individual fractions [4,5,6,7].
The distribution of PAHs between gaseous and particulate phases is important because the mechanisms and biomarkers of chemical and particle/fiber carcinogenesis are different. While pure PAH procarcinogens are metabolized via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR)-mediated pathway to DNA-reactive intermediates, or detoxified and excreted from the body, particulates, fibers and some metals induce the formation of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species (RNS), and oxidative DNA damage. The oxidative stress-induced gene expression is regulated by the transcription factor, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2). Nevertheless, these two pathways co-operate in many ways, and may potentiate each other in the formation of oxidative DNA damage (e.g., [8]).
Involuntary Tobacco Smoking
Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is a significant source of PAH and other tobacco carcinogens for non-smokers in workplaces, especially in poorly ventilated environments. ETS is a complex mixture of gaseous and particulate-bound compounds, including known carcinogens such as acrolein, aromatic amines, acetaldehydes, benzene, cadmium, 1,3-butadiene, tobacco-specific nitrosamines, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [6, 9, 10]. ETS consists mainly of sidestream smoke emitted from smoldering cigarettes between puffs and to a lesser extent of mainstream smoke exhaled by tobacco smokers [11]. The delivery of different compounds by mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke is influenced by the efficiency of combustion and differs between tobacco brands due to tobacco blends, ingredients, design, and differences in manufacture. The harmful chemicals in sidestream tobacco smoke are principally responsible for the deleterious health effects of involuntary tobacco smoking. Lodovici et al. studied the PAH content in mainstream and sidestream tobacco smoke from 14 tobacco brands and found that sidestream smoke contained about ten times higher PAH levels than mainstream smoke from most cigarette brands [12]. While the tar content of cigarettes is a good predictor of the release of PAHs in mainstream smoke, PAHs in sidestream smoke do not correlate with tar content [12, 13]. Furthermore, levels of carcinogenic PAH compound benzo[a]pyrene are especially high in sidestream tobacco smoke [12]. Most carcinogenic PAH compounds are present in the particulate phase of tobacco smoke.
The use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, “vaping”) also carries adverse effects on the indoor air quality and exposes the users and non-users to toxic or carcinogenic chemicals. Although the concentrations of many conventional tobacco carcinogens are much lower in e-cigarette aerosols, new harmful chemicals such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, are produced from the heating process of glycerol which is one of the main ingredients of e-liquids (see review Zainol Abidin et al. [14]).
Metabolic Activation of PAH Procarcinogens
PAH compounds enter cells as procarcinogens which require metabolic activation to exert their carcinogenic potential. In lung cells PAH compounds bind to a cytoplasmic AH (dioxin) receptor which, after ligand binding, is translocated to the nucleus and dissociates from the cytoplasmic chaperone complex. It then associates with its dimerization partner, ARNT protein, and binds to xenobiotic (dioxin)-responsive elements (XRE) in the promoter (enhancer) regions of AHR-responsive genes, turning on their transcription (for example [15, 16]). AH receptor regulates the transcription of several cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, which are involved in the Phase I metabolism of xenobiotics, and also the transcription of a few Phase II enzymes, including UDP-glucuronosyltransferases 1A1 and 1A6, glutathione S-transferase A2, and NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1). Generally speaking, Phase I metabolism is responsible for the initial activation step of metabolism, often leading to the formation of reactive intermediates, whereas Phase II metabolism involves the conversion to more polar and water-soluble compounds and detoxification [15, 17].
In the lung, cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP1A1 and CYP1B1, which are under the regulative control of AHR, and epoxide hydrolase catalyze the conversion of PAH procarcinogens to proximate carcinogenic metabolites, PAH-diols, and CYPs further to ultimate carcinogenic metabolites PAH-diol-epoxides.
Reactive metabolites may bind to proteins and DNA, thereby forming adducts, or become detoxified by Phase II enzymes, such as glutathione S-transferases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, and sulfotransferases [17, 18]. PAH-diols are also metabolized by aldo-keto reductases (AKR) into reactive PAH ο-quinones, which are able to form stable and depurinated DNA adducts. The metabolic route catalyzed by AKRs leads to amplified production of ROS ([8], see section Co-carcinogenesis of PAH and inhaled particulates). Furthermore, PAHs are catalyzed by peroxidase activities into radical cations that form depurinated adducts [17, 19,20,21].
Bulky DNA adducts, which mainly originate from PAH, are considered a measure of internal dose of PAH and if not repaired, may lead to DNA damage. Dennissenko and colleagues mapped the distribution of benzo[a]pyrene diol-epoxide (BPDE) DNA adducts along exons of the TP53 gene and observed strong and selective adduct formation at guanine positions in codons 157, 248, and 273. These same codons are the mutational hotspots in human lung cancer [22]. Subsequent studies have shown that methylated CpG dinucleotides are the preferential target for BPDE adduct formation and G:C to T:A transversions at TP53 codons 157, 248, 249, and 273 [23, 24]. The molecular alterations caused by tobacco-derived PAH and occupational PAH exposures are not separable.
Co-carcinogenesis of PAH and Inhaled Particulates
It has long been known in epidemiology that tobacco smoking and asbestos exposure have a synergistic, almost multiplicative effect on lung cancer risk as compared to the risk caused by either exposure alone. The exact mechanisms for the synergism are not known, but the emerging knowledge of the co-operation between the transcription factors and signaling pathways that are induced by PAH procarcinogens and oxidative stress offers a plausible view on co-carcinogenesis. Oxidative stress, together with its effects on cellular structure and function, plays a central role in the carcinogenic process induced by inhaled particulates, including asbestos fibers, silica, and carcinogenic metals, as well as ionizing radiation.
While PAH compounds exert their effects via the AH receptor, which regulates the transcription of a number of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes by binding to XRE in the promoters of responsive genes, NRF2 is involved in the regulation of redox homeostasis and controls the antioxidant gene battery via binding to antioxidant responsive elements (ARE) in the regulatory sequences of NRF2-driven genes [25, 26].
Many of the NRF2-regulated genes encode enzymes which are responsible for the detoxification of reactive electrophiles formed by Phase I metabolism by CYPs or for the elimination of reactive oxygen species, including enzymes such as NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), glutathione transferases, UDP-glucuronosyltransferases, aldehyde dehydrogenase, and several antioxidant enzymes [27, 28]. AHR- and NRF2-regulated signaling is coordinated by several mechanisms, for example AHR and NRF2 genes contain each others’ binding elements in their regulatory enhancer regions [25]. Furthermore, induction of the expression of a group of genes, such as detoxification enzyme NQO1, requires both AHR and NRF2 [26].
Human aldo-keto reductases AKR1C1, AKR1C2, and AKR1C3 that are under the regulative control of NRF2 catalyze the oxidation of non-K-region PAH trans-dihydrodiols to the corresponding o-quinones with concomitant production of ROS. The ROS produced can lead to further induction of AKRs, and CYPs via AHR, and amplification of the PAH activation, resulting in the formation of DNA adducts, above all formation of the marker adduct of oxidative DNA damage, namely 8-hydroxyguanine (8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, 8-OH-G) [8]. Similarly, the ROS produced by particle-induced oxidative stress can potentiate NRF2- and AHR-mediated PAH procarcinogen activation and aggravate the formation of oxidative DNA damage (Fig. 13.1).
The Role of NRF2 in Cancer Promotion
The cytoprotective role of NRF2 as activator of the cellular antioxidant response is long known. It has been shown recently that the constant activation of NRF2 may not be beneficial in all stages of carcinogenesis [29]. The loss of the regulative control of NRF2 in human lung cancer cells may result from several aberrations, such as mutations in the NRF2 gene or its repressor KEAP1 (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1) [30, 31]. KEAP1, which is considered a tumor suppressor, may also be silenced by hypermethylation or the deletion of the chromosomal region 19p [32, 33]. These aberrations, which lead to constant NRF2 activation, may arise as a protective response against reactive electrophiles and oxygen species, or become selected by means of giving a growth advantage and permitting cancer cells to avoid apoptosis [18, 34]. Constant NRF2 activation results in overexpression of a number of NRF2-dependent genes, most of them cytoprotective and antioxidant enzymes. Upregulation of NRF2-mediated gene expression seems to involve genes that may promote cancer cell growth, including growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor 13, TGF-α, TGF-β1, and -β2, and growth factor receptors [34]. It has been shown that NRF2 activity regulates the sensitivity of death signals and NRF2 overexpression antagonizes apoptosis [35,36,37,38]. The antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins are under the regulative control of NFR2, and constant activation of NRF2 leads to overexpression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL, decreased apoptosis, and increased survival of cancer cells [37, 38]. Furthermore, one such NRF2-regulated antioxidant enzyme, peroxiredoxin 1 (PRX1), which is commonly upregulated in human cancer, has a dual role as it may provide resistance to oxidative stress in cancer cells by the inhibition of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) activation and subsequent ASK1-induced apoptosis [39].
The enhancement of the oxidative stress and consequent apoptotic pressure by combined exposures to tobacco and particulate carcinogens may lead to DNA damage in critical genes, resulting in uncontrolled expression of NRF2-regulated genes, inhibition of apoptosis, and growth advantage to cancer cells. One of these critical aberrations, the deletion of the 19p chromosomal region, is especially common in asbestos-related lung cancer [32, 40]. The postulated mechanisms of co-carcinogenesis of tobacco carcinogens and oxidative stress are shown in Fig. 13.1.
Biomarkers
Biomarkers of PAH Exposure
The biomarkers of PAH exposure most commonly used are urinary PAH metabolites, in particular 1-hydroxypyrene. 1-hydroxypyrene and other urinary noncarcinogenic and carcinogenic PAH metabolites are thought to reflect total PAH exposure. The level of urinary PAH metabolites is influenced not only by occupational exposure, but also by diet, tobacco smoking, and environmental air pollution. Typically, in air samples from foundries and petrochemical plants, PAH concentrations are about three orders of magnitude higher than those in environmental exposures. Similarly, urinary 1-hydroxypyrene concentrations reflect the exposure levels well at the group level. PAH-DNA or protein adducts are considered the measure of an effective dose of PAH exposure.
Biomarkers of Oxidative DNA Damage
DNA strand breaks and 8-hydroxyguanine (8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, 8-oxoGuo, 8-OH-G, 8-OH-dG) formation are the most commonly used tests for oxidative DNA damage caused by exposure to PAH and inhaled particulates in the scientific literature. The oxidized DNA product 8-OH-G is formed in the reaction of guanine with hydroxyl radical [41]. This mutagenic and carcinogenic DNA product is a good biomarker of oxidative stress, and can be determined in urine or circulating white blood cells [41]. 8-OH-G levels in urine are also influenced by gender, age, body mass index, and lifestyle factors, such as tobacco smoking, hard physical labor, and diet [42, 43].
DNA strand breaks can be studied by comet assay (alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis assay) in cultured cells or in the circulating blood lymphocytes of exposed individuals [44]. Tarantini et al. [45] studied the relative contribution of DNA strand breaks and DNA adducts to the genotoxicity of B[a]P as a pure compound and in complex mixtures collected from an urban peri-industrial site and a metallurgical plant. Treatment of HepG2-cultured human hepatocytes with pure B[a]P or with a fraction of atmospheric particles containing soluble PAH did not induce oxidative DNA damage as measured by DNA strand breaks in comet assay or the formation of 8-oxoGuo, whereas B[a]PDE adducts were observed with even low concentrations. In contrast, samples filtered from industrial and especially those from urban sites induced DNA strand breaks and the formation of 8-oxoGuo, and less BPDE adducts, suggesting that a component other than PAH, possibly particulate matter in the mixture, modulates the genotoxic properties of complex mixtures [45].
The most commonly used biomarkers of internal dose, biologically effective dose, and early effects in relation to occupational exposures to PAH and complex mixtures are listed in Table 13.1.
Metal-Induced Lung Carcinogenesis
Metal-induced carcinogenesis has been covered in detail in several recent reviews cited in this chapter. For more information regarding metal carcinogenesis, readers are referred to these and other literature, and for the basic biological mechanisms of carcinogenesis, Chap. 3 of this book.
Arsenic
Arsenic (As) and its compounds have been identified by IARC as group I human carcinogen, causing cancers of the skin, liver, kidney, bladder, and lung [46]. Globally, arsenite [As(III)] or arsenate [As(V)] is a significant contaminant of drinking water, causing an excess of cancers especially of the skin and bladder. Occupational exposure, via inhalation of As compounds such as arsenic trioxide, arsenic trisulfide, and calcium arsenate, increases lung cancer risk in ore smelters, insecticide manufacture, and sheep dip workers [47].
Oxidative DNA Damage
The inorganic arsenics can be methylated in vivo to form monomethylarsonic acid (MMA) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA) in a process of repeated reductions and oxidative methylations, which enhance excretion from the body. However, methylated arsenicals also have a more adverse effect in human cells than the parent compound. MMA and DMA are also ingredients in weed killer chemicals. Trivalent methylated arsenicals are biologically highly reactive, and can interact with cellular targets such as proteins and DNA [47,48,49,50]. As metabolism in cells leads to the generation of a variety of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, including superoxide, singlet oxygen, hydrogen peroxide, the peroxyl radical, nitric oxide, dimethylarsinic peroxyl radicals, and the dimethylarsinic radical [41, 51]. The exact mechanism for the generation of these reactive species is not clear, but the formation of intermediary arsine species or the oxidation of As(III) to As(V) has been suggested [41, 52]. As(III) and MMA(III) have been shown to cause NRF2 activation via mechanisms involving autophagy and p62, a substrate adaptor protein with a critical role in autophagy [53]. The formation of 8-hydroxyl-2’deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) DNA adducts is a biomarker of oxidative stress to DNA. Increased levels of 8-OHdG adducts have been detected after exposure to arsenic in cells, animal models, and in arsenic-induced lesions of human skin [51, 52, 54, 55].
Genotoxicity and DNA Repair
Arsenic is not mutagenic in standard assays, but it is genotoxic and induces chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, aneuploidy, micronuclei formation, and DNA-protein cross-links [56,57,58,59]. As(III) has been demonstrated by alkaline single-cell gel electrophoresis (comet) assay to induce DNA strand breaks in various human and rodent cells [51, 60,61,62]. As(III)-induced DNA strand breaks are caused by ROS production, and breaks may lead to chromosomal rearrangements. Wang et al. [63] have shown that As(III)-induced DNA strand breaks largely result from excision of oxidative DNA adducts and DNA-protein cross-links during excision repair. As inhibits completion of DNA excision repair via effects on DNA ligase activity perhaps due to being a phosphate analog and interfering with phosphorylation reactions and phosphate transport [51, 64,65,66,67]. Exposure to As has been shown to inhibit critical DNA repair enzymes. Morales et al. [68] demonstrated in a culture assay system that exposure to As trioxide shifted double strand break DNA repair towards error prone non-homologous end joining and inhibited homologous recombination. Exposure to As(III) has also been linked to mismatch repair deficiency and concomitant microsatellite instability in human colorectal cancer cells [69].
Arsenic exposure has been related especially with squamous cell histological lung cancer type [70, 71]. Martinez et al. [72] studied gene copy number alterations in squamous cell lung carcinomas from non-smokers exposed to As in drinking water and observed the most recurrent losses at chromosomal regions 1q21.1, 7p22.3, 9q12, and 19q13.31 and gain at 19q13.33. These findings are in agreement with the ability of As to induce DNA strand breaks and genomic instability. Martinez et al. [73] performed whole-genome sequencing analysis on lung squamous cell carcinoma from a heavily arsenic-exposed non-smoker. They found increased number of copies at 3q26 and overall low number of point mutations, including mutations rarely detected in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.
Epigenetic Mechanisms
Epigenetic mechanisms, such as methylation, histone modifications and microRNAs are involved in arsenic-induced carcinogenesis. As treatment of rat liver cells and human keratinocytes has resulted in reduced expression and activity of DNA methyltransferases, inducing global DNA hypomethylation [74,75,76]. As treatment or exposure has also been associated with the silencing of tumor suppressor genes by hypermethylation of their promoter regions, such as RASSF1A and RPSS3 in human bladder cancer [77], p16(INK4a) and RASSF1A in murine lung cancer [78], DEPK in SV-40-immortalized human urothelial cells and in human urothelial (bladder) carcinomas from the arsenic-contaminated area [79, 80], TP53 in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells [81], and TP53 and P16(INK4A) in whole blood DNA of people exposed to arsenic in drinking water [82]. Both the global hypomethylation and hypermethylation of promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes are common alterations in malignant tumors. It has also been shown that As(III) changes global histone H3 methylation levels in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells [76, 83] and in blood mononuclear cells of individuals exposed to arsenic in drinking water [76, 83, 84].
MicroRNAs are a family of small non-coding RNA molecules that negatively regulate protein-coding gene expression. Aberrant expression of non-coding RNAs and the consequent disruption of signaling pathways have been implicated in As-induced carcinogenesis [85, 86]. As exposure activates several signal transduction pathways which enhance cell proliferation or reduce antiproliferative signaling, inhibit differentiation, and override the cell cycle checkpoints that control cell division and apoptosis [86]. Downregulation of microRNAs of miR-200 family and upregulation of miR-21 (oncomiR-21) are involved in arsenite-induced malignant transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells [87, 88].
Arsenic as a Co-carcinogen
Arsenic is a powerful co-carcinogen and is able to enhance the carcinogenicity of other agents, such as ultraviolet and ionizing radiation, benzo[a]pyrene, N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, diepoxybutane, and methylmethane sulfonate in cell and animal models [65, 66, 89,90,91,92,93,94,95]. There is epidemiological evidence of the synergistic effect of ingested As and tobacco smoking on lung cancer risk [96, 97]. A Taiwanese study demonstrated the synergy for the squamous and small cell but not for the adenocarcinoma of the lung [98]. The same group demonstrated that As increased the metabolism of a tobacco-specific nitrosamine, 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK), via activation of Cyp2a in mouse liver, and the metabolism of another tobacco carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene, by enhancement of CYP1A1 expression and activity via the AH receptor with a mechanism involving oxidative stress, in a human adenocarcinoma cell line [101, 102]. CYP enzymes catalyze the initial step (Phase I) in the metabolism of nitrosamine and PAH procarcinogens, including benzo[a]pyrene, which is necessary for the subsequent reactions leading to the formation of DNA-reactive metabolites, as well as detoxification (Fig. 13.1).
Beryllium
Beryllium (Be) and beryllium-containing compounds are classified as human carcinogens or likely human carcinogens, causing lung cancer [46, 103]. Much of the human epidemiological data demonstrating increased lung cancer risk are associated with very high exposures which took place before the 1950s in plants involved in the extraction of beryllium hydroxide from beryl ore, ore refining, and beryllium processing including the production of beryllium oxide, pure beryllium metal, and beryllium copper alloy, and the machining of beryllium-containing materials [103].
There is no extensive research data concerning the mechanisms of beryllium-related carcinogenesis. Gordon and Bowser have reviewed the studies on the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of beryllium [104]. The different chemical forms have had differing effects on mutagenicity and carcinogenicity and there are no data concerning the beryllium forms relevant to human exposures, i.e., respirable size particles of beryllium metal, alloys, or ceramics [103, 104]. Mammalian test systems have shown evidence of beryllium-induced mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and cell transformation, whereas bacterial tests have been negative [104].
Epigenetic alterations have been detected in beryllium metal-induced rat lung tumors. Belinsky et al. observed hypermethylation of the promoter, and loss of transcription in the p16(INK4a) tumor suppressor gene in 80% of beryllium-induced rat lung tumors [105].
Cadmium
Cadmium (Cd) is classified as a human lung carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [46]. Exposure to Cd is common because the metal is widely used in industry, for example in electroplating, paints and pigments, welding, and in Nickel-Cd batteries. Significant amounts of Cd are also released into the environment by human activities [106]. An emerging source of exposure is cadmium-based quantum dots, which are light-emitting nanoparticles used as fluorescent labels in bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications [107, 108]. Moreover, Cd is present in the earth’s crust, and is selectively taken up by certain edible plants and by for example the tobacco plant, making tobacco smoke a significant source of Cd for smokers. The amount of Cd stored in organs depends on their content of a Cd-binding protein, metallothionein. The half-life of Cd in humans is 15–20 years; in lung tissue, Cd is cleared with a half-life of 9 years after quitting smoking [106, 109].
Oxidative DNA Damage
Several mechanisms contribute to the carcinogenicity of Cd [106, 110]. Cd is a weak genotoxic agent and its genotoxicity , i.e., chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchange, DNA strand breaks, and DNA-protein cross-links, is partially mediated by oxygen radical damage [106, 111,112,113]. Cd is able to induce the generation of ROS in vitro and in vivo, including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl radical, and lipid radicals, in spite of not functioning as a catalyst in the Fenton reaction [110]. It has been proposed that Cd can replace iron and copper in cytoplasmic and membrane proteins, thus increasing the amount of free or chelated copper and iron, which in turn may induce oxidative stress via Fenton reactions [41, 114]. Following exposure to Cd, several transcription factors and pathways are activated that are responsive to oxidative stress, including transcription factors AP-1, NF-κВ, and NRF2, and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) signal transduction pathways [110]. MAPKs play an important role in programmed cell death (apoptosis) for the elimination of cells with oxidative DNA damage.
Recent research reports have highlighted the significance of NRF2/p62 pathway in metal-induced carcinogenesis. The p62 is ubiquitin-binding scaffolding protein with a critical role in the cellular processes of autophagy and oxidative stress signaling [116]. It has been shown that Cd induces malignant transformation of human bronchial epithelial cells via ROS production, and that Cd-transformed cells exhibit dysfunction of autophagy resulting in p62 overexpression and accumulation [117, 118]. The p62 interacts with the NFR2-binding site of KEAP1, the repressor protein of NRF2, leading to constitutive NRF2 activation, and consequently, high expression of antioxidant and antiapoptotic proteins, apoptosis resistance, and increased cancer cell survival and proliferation [117].
DNA Repair
The potential of Cd to inhibit the repair of oxidative DNA damage has been demonstrated in several in vitro and in vivo studies, and it is considered a major mechanism of Cd-induced carcinogenesis [106, 119, 120]. The repair mechanisms reported to be inhibited by Cd include nucleotide excision repair, non-homologous end joining, base excision repair, and mismatch repair (Morales et al. [68] and references therein). Inhibition of DNA damage repair by Cd is thought to be attributable to its effects on enzymes involved in oxidative damage repair, as Cd can be substituted for zinc in zinc-finger proteins, resulting in the enzyme’s defective repair capacity [106, 121]. Morales et al. [68] demonstrated in a cell culture assay system that low doses of nickel and Cd promote mutagenic non-allelic recombination as a major repair pathway of DNA double strand breaks. Cd has also been shown to increase microsatellite instability concomitantly with ROS production and decreased levels of mismatch repair proteins [69].
Epigenetic Mechanisms
The role of epigenetic mechanisms in Cd carcinogenesis is uncertain [74]. In human prostate cells and in another study using rat liver cells, Cd initially induced global DNA hypomethylation followed by hypermethylation after prolonged exposure [122, 123]. In human prostate cells, promoter hypermethylation and reduced expression of RASSF1A and p16 tumor suppressor genes were observed [122]. It is hypothesized that global DNA hypomethylation is associated with Cd-induced cell proliferation [74, 124]. The possible effect of Cd on histone tail posttranslational modifications is not known [74].
Chromium
Chromium VI [hexavalent chromium, Cr(VI)] compounds have been identified as human lung carcinogens [46]. Cr(VI) is widely used in a variety of industries, for example in paints, metal finishes, stainless steel manufacturing, alloys, welding, and in wood treatment. In contrast to other oxidation states of Cr, Cr(VI) is easily transported into cells by an anionic transport system, and subsequently reduced to lower oxidation states by a number of reducing agents, such as glutathione, NADPH-dependent glutathione reductase, ascorbate, cysteine, lipoic acid, hydrogen peroxide, fructose, and ribose [125, 126]. It is thought that Cr(III) is unable to cross cell membranes, but recently it has been suggested that certain Cr(V) and Cr(III) forms generated by reduction in the extracellular space have high permeability through cell membranes [41, 127, 128]. Insoluble Cr compounds can enter cells via phagocytosis. Particulate or water-insoluble Cr(VI) compounds are more potent than soluble species in causing DNA damage, possibly because of the fast clearance of soluble Cr(VI), whereas poorly soluble particulates may form a persistent source of carcinogenic Cr species in the lung [129, 130].
Oxidative DNA Damage and Genotoxicity
Intracellular reduction of Cr(VI) is the main source of reactive intermediates and the extensive formation of Cr-DNA adducts and subsequent DNA damage [41, 86, 126]. Cr(V), when formed, can have a Fenton-like reaction with hydrogen peroxide, generating hydroxyl radical. Associated other reactions can produce thiyl and superoxide radicals [41, 126]. In addition to free radical induced DNA damage, the formation of Cr-DNA adducts, above others Cr(III)-mediated DNA cross-links of glutathione, cysteine, histidine, and ascorbate, is responsible for the mutagenicity and genotoxicity of Cr(VI) [41, 131]. Other Cr-induced structural genetic lesions include DNA strand breaks, DNA-protein cross-links, oxidized bases, abasic sites, and DNA-inter- and intrastrand cross-links [126, 132]. Wakeman et al. [133, 134] have shown that exposure to the unstable intermediates Cr(V) and Cr(IV), generated during the reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III), can induce highly genotoxic DNA double strand breaks. While Cr(VI) is not able to directly interact with DNA and exposure to Cr(V) resulted in the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints, exposure to Cr(IV) failed to activate optimal DNA damage response and caused a high frequency of mutations, supporting the role of Cr(IV) as the ultimate mutagenic species [134]. The group also found that a mismatch repair protein MLH1 is required for the activation of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint in response to Cr exposure.
DNA Repair
The DNA damage caused by Cr can lead to dysfunctional DNA replication and transcription and promote genomic instability by dysregulated repair mechanisms, especially by loss of mismatch repair. Microsatellite instability (MSI) reflects the loss of functional mismatch repair mechanism. A Japanese group has compared the presence of replication error phenotype between lung cancers in chromate-exposed and non-exposed individuals. They observed significantly more frequent MSI and repression of DNA mismatch repair proteins MLH1 and MLH2 in the lung cancers of chromate-exposed workers [135, 136]. These findings are contradicted by the lung cell experiments by Rodrigues et al. [137], who observed aneuploid phenotype but did not find MSI or reduced expression of mismatch repair proteins in human bronchial epithelial cells malignantly transformed by hexavalent Cr. These differences suggest that replication error phenotype may not be the initial event leading to cancer development in chromate-exposed workers.
In earlier studies on chromate-exposed lung cancer patients, mutations of RAS oncogenes and TP53 tumor suppressor gene were infrequent [138, 139]. However, TP53 mutations were unusual changes of AT base pairs and double missense mutations [139].
Epigenetic Mechanisms
Chromates have induced gene expression changes by epigenetic mechanisms in tumor suppressors and other critical genes both in experimental settings and in vivo. Interesting data have been published concerning mechanisms contributing to the co-carcinogenesis of hexavalent Cr and a model polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon procarcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene. In mouse hepatoma cells, treatment with potassium chromate represses the expression of the benzo[a]pyrene-metabolizing Cyp1a1 enzyme, blocking the detoxification pathway, and consequently enhances the formation of benzo[a]pyrene-diol-epoxide-DNA adducts [115]. It was shown that Cr cross-links histone deacetylase 1-methyltransferase complexes to the Cyp1a1 promoter and inhibits gene transcription. The same research group previously demonstrated approximately 50 other benzo[a]pyrene-inducible genes that were repressed by Cr in a similar manner, including receptor-associated kinases, transcription factors, and genes associated with cell cycle regulation, differentiation, and apoptosis [140]. In human lung adenocarcinoma cell line, potassium chromate induced global changes in various histone tail modifications, including an increase in H3K9 dimethylation in the promoter of the DNA mismatch repair gene, MLH1, and a decrease of its expression [141]. Furthermore, hypermethylation of the promoter regions of several tumor suppressor genes, particularly MLH1, APC, and P16 genes, has been reported in lung carcinomas of patients with over 15 years’ occupational exposure to chromates [142, 143].
Cr has also been shown to exert its cell transformation capacity via induction of a stress response protein NUPR1 (nuclear protein 1 or p8). NUPR1 regulates key cellular functions, such as cell cycle, apoptosis, autophagy, chromatin accessibility, and transcription, via interactions with molecular partners [144]. Exposure to Cr(VI) induces NUPR1 overexpression, which decreases the level of histone H4K16 acetylation leading to the transcriptional downregulation at several genomic loci, thereby contributing malignant transformation [145].
Recent literature has highlighted the role of microRNAs in Cr(VI)-induced malignant transformation. He et al. [146] found that miR-143 was downregulated in Cr(VI)-transformed human bronchial epithelial cells. Pratheeshkumar et al. [147] showed that exposure to Cr(VI) increased (onco)miR-21 levels in human bronchial epithelial cells, resulting in inhibition of the tumor suppressor programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4), and furthermore, knockdown of miR-21 significantly reduced the Cr(VI)-induced cell transformation.
Nickel
All nickel [Ni(II)] compounds are classified into group I human carcinogens, which can cause nasal and lung cancer, and metallic Ni as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) [46]. Ni is an abundant element in the earth’s crust. It is used in the metallurgical industry in the production of stainless steel and alloys, in electroplating, stainless steel welding, Ni-Cd batteries, and in the production of nanoparticles [148]. Ni pollution in the environment originates from the combustion of fossil fuels in vehicles and power plants, industrial sources, waste incinerators, disposal of Ni compounds, and volcanic eruptions. Ni also deposits in the soil and plants, which increases exposure via food, drinking water, and tobacco smoking.
Inhalation is the main route of exposure for workers exposed to carcinogenic Ni compounds in industry. While both soluble and poorly soluble Ni compounds are considered carcinogenic, water-insoluble compounds, which enter cells via phagocytosis, are readily dissolved in cellular lysosomes and generate high intracellular levels of Ni2+ cations and consequently exhibit higher cytotoxicity and genotoxicity [149]. Potential carcinogens are insoluble dusts of nickel subsulfides and nickel oxides, the vapor of nickel carbonyl, and the soluble aerosols of nickel sulfate, nitrate, or chloride [150].
Genotoxicity
Although Ni compounds are not mutagenic in traditional mutation tests, they can induce malignant transformation in human and rodent cells [149, 151,152,153,154,155]. Soluble and insoluble Ni compounds induce genetic abnormalities, preferentially in heterochromatin. Genetic aberrations, such as DNA strand breaks, DNA-protein cross-links, deletion/insertion and single gene mutations, sister chromatid exchanges, micronuclei, and microsatellite mutations have been observed in mammalian or human cells in vitro [156].
Compared with Cd and Cr, Ni is a weak inducer of oxidative stress [157, 158]. However, the reactivity of Ni with oxygen derivatives can be modulated by chelation with certain histidine- and cysteine-containing ligands, and free radicals may arise from the reaction of Ni(II)-thiol complexes and molecular oxygen, or lipid hydroperoxides [158]. G → T transversion mutations, typical of oxidative DNA damage, have been detected in codon 12 of K-ras oncogene in rat renal sarcomas induced with nickel subsulfide and iron [159]. Several Ni compounds have been shown to increase oxidative DNA damage and the formation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) adducts in cultured cells and in rat lungs after intratracheal instillation of Ni compounds [160]. Furthermore, high levels of 8-OH-dG adducts and the DNA repair marker 8-hydroxyguanine DNA glycosidase 1 have been detected in blood cells of Ni-smelting workers [161]. Son et al. have shown that the ROS-inducible transcription factor NRF2 is constitutively highly expressed in Ni-transformed human bronchial epithelial cells [162]. NRF2 overexpression increases autophagy via STAT3 signaling, and upregulates the expression of antioxidant and antiapoptotic proteins, contributing to apoptosis resistance and tumorigenesis [162].
Epigenetic Mechanisms
Epigenetic mechanisms are considered more important than genetic changes in nickel-induced carcinogenesis (see also Chap. 3). Nickel binds to heterochromatin rather than euchromatin, where it alters the heterochromatin structure, causing chromatin condensation, inhibition of histone H4 acetylation, and de novo DNA methylation [74, 149, 163, 164]. Ni2+ is able to displace Mg2+ in the phosphate backbone of DNA and increase the level of chromatin condensation and subsequent DNA methylation and heterochromatinization [165]. Histone acetylation is necessary for transcriptional activation. Ni restricts the acetylation of histone H4 by binding with its N-terminal histidine-18 and by influencing histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity [166,167,168]. Ni also increased histone H3K9 dimethylation (H3K9me2) in a transgene when the transgene was integrated near the heterochromatin region [169]. Jose et al. [170] showed that Ni can disrupt H3K9me2 domain structures genome-wide, resulting in spreading of H3K9me2 into the active genomic regions and gene silencing. The group suggested a mechanism involving the inhibition of the insulator protein CCCTC-binding factor at the H3K9me2 domain boundaries. Chen et al. [99, 100] demonstrated that Ni inhibits the activation of dioxygenase enzymes, such as histone demethylase MJD1A and DNA repair enzyme ABH2, by replacing the non-heme iron at their catalytic center. The loss of histone acetylation and de novo DNA methylation silence genes, and the silencing of critical genes, such as tumor suppressor genes, contributes to carcinogenesis.
The promoter of tumor suppressor gene p16 has been constantly hypermethylated in the nickel sulfide-induced malignant fibrous histiocytomas of wild-type mice and mice heterozygous for the tumor suppressor p53 gene [171]. Also, methylation has been observed in the enhancer regions of RAR-β2, RASSF1A, and CDKN2A genes of rat muscle tumors induced by nickel subsulfide [172]. Histone modifications have been studied in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of Ni refinery workers, steel workers, and Ni-smelting workers. In these worker groups, changes in histone H3 methylation and acetylation were observed as compared to non-exposed referents, and some of the changes correlated with the length of the employment [173,174,175].
Hypoxic Signaling
Activation of hypoxic signaling is another main alteration with significance in Ni-induced carcinogenesis. Gene expression profiling with Affymetrix chips on wild-type or the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) knockout mouse embryo cells found that after NiCl2 treatment, 114 genes were upregulated and 66 genes downregulated in a manner characteristic of the activation of the hypoxic signaling pathway [176]. The HIF-1 transcription factor is a dimer consisting of two subunits, HIF-1α and HIF-1β (ARNT), which is formed in response to low oxygen tension in cells, and together with transcriptional co-activators, regulates the transactivation of HIF-dependent genes. HIF-1α acts as an oxygen sensor, which in the presence of hypoxia or Ni, avoids ubiquitylation and proteosomal degradation and accumulates in cells [86]. Hypoxic signaling is thought to be one of the pathways that Ni exposure can induce by disrupting cellular iron homeostasis [177, 178]. In hypoxic cancer and stromal cells, HIF-1 transactivates growth and survival factors, such as VEGF, FGF, PAI-I, adrenomedullin, and NOS, which induce endothelial cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis [149].
DNA Repair
Nucleotide and base excision repair pathways are impaired by Ni compounds, at least partially by the damage of zinc fingers in DNA repair proteins [179]. Morales et al. [68] studied in a culture assay system how Ni exposure modifies DNA double strand break repair outcomes and found that NiCl2 favors repair through non-allelic recombination events with a significant increase of non-templated sequence insertions at the repair site. Scanlon et al. [180] demonstrated that Ni exposure downregulates the DNA repair proteins which are involved in homology-dependent DNA double strand break repair (HDR) and mismatch repair (MMR) in human bronchial epithelial cells and in lung adenocarcinoma cells in a dose-dependent manner. Interestingly, these functional changes in DNA repair were similar to those induced by hypoxic stress.
Ni compounds induce carcinogenesis by a number of different mechanisms , including genetic and epigenetic changes, affecting signal transduction pathways, especially hypoxic signaling, and inhibiting DNA repair. There is evidence that Ni interferes with cellular metabolism by disrupting iron homeostasis and inhibiting the function of iron-dependent enzymes.
Mechanisms of Ionizing Radiation-Induced Carcinogenesis
Ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage is described in more detail in Chap. 3 and illustrated in Fig. 3.1. Exposure via inhalation to uranium-containing particles and radon decay products, including high linear energy transfer (LET) alpha-particles, through the mining and processing of ore for nuclear power and weapons is associated with increased lung cancer risk [181]. Uranium is a radioactive heavy metal, the radioactivity of which is attributable to the 222Rn and 220Rn isotopes and their decay products. Studies among miners have been complicated by complex exposures to particulate and non-particulate matter in mines, including arsenic, silica, and diesel exhaust [182, 183].
Ionizing radiation (IR) produces reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that are responsible for oxidative stress and inflammatory response. The inflammatory reaction and oxidative damage is dependent on the dose of IR. Large deletions resulting in partial or complete deletion of entire genes, and loss of heterozygosity in the neighboring chromosomal regions are the predominant event induced by alpha irradiation in vitro [182, 184]. High-LET alpha-emitters including radon, plutonium, and Thorotrast, induce double strand breaks and clustered lesions, which are more difficult to repair than single strand breaks and depurinated, oxidized or deaminated bases, produced by low-LET X-rays and gamma-rays [185,186,187,188,189]. High-LET alpha-emitters also induce genomic instability through the inactivation of DNA mismatch repair [190, 191]. Most DNA damage produced by IR is repaired by base excision repair, and nucleotide excision repair, double strand break repair, and mismatch repair have lesser roles [192]. Erroneous rejoining of double strand breaks can result in genomic instability.
In normal cells, IR induces apoptosis or cellular senescence through increased expression of tumor suppressor genes P16(INK4A) and TP53 via the DNA damage response. An early study has reported a predominance of the TP53 codon 249 AGGarg →ATGmet mutation in lung cancer of uranium miners, whereas subsequent studies have failed to show any mutational hotspots related to radon exposure [193, 194]. There is evidence that epigenetic changes are related to exposure to IR and its early biological effects. The cumulative exposure to radon gas in Chinese uranium miners correlated positively with promoter hypermethylation of the P16(INK4A) tumor suppressor and O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) DNA repair genes in sputum [195]. In another cohort of New Mexico uranium miners, exposure to radon gas did not increase the aberrant methylation of these genes in sputum, as compared to exposure to tobacco smoke alone [196]. Belinsky et al. [197] have shown a higher prevalence of P16(INK4A) promoter methylation in the lung adenocarcinomas of workers exposed to 239plutonium than that among non-exposed controls.
Conclusion
Many carcinogenic chemicals, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, present in combustion products and tobacco smoke, enter cells as procarcinogens and require metabolic activation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes to exert their deleterious effects, including binding to DNA and formation of DNA adducts which, if not repaired, may lead to mutations in critical genes and cancer initiation. The induction of oxygen radical damage is considered the main mechanism of particle and metal carcinogenesis. In workplace air many carcinogens exist as complex mixtures, in which chemical compounds are bound to metal and mineral particles of respirable size. In lung cells, the components of complex mixtures induce oxidative stress as well as activation of chemical procarcinogens via intermingled pathways that may potentiate the DNA damage caused by either particle or chemical carcinogen alone. Carcinogenic metals are thought to induce oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage. Recent studies have shown that carcinogenic metals may replace metal ions, such as iron and zinc, in critical enzymes involved in DNA repair, histone methylation, and hypoxic signaling, for example. Epigenetic carcinogenic mechanisms have recently been found to play a larger role than previously thought, in environmental carcinogenesis.
References
Anderson DS, Patchin ES, Silva RM, et al. Influence of particle size on persistence and clearance of aerosolized silver nanoparticles in the rat lung. Toxicol Sci. 2015;144(2):366–81.
Hansen AM, Mathiesen L, Pedersen M, Knudsen LE. Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-HP) in environmental and occupational studies—a review. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2008;211(5–6):471–503.
Georgiadis P, Stoikidou M, Topinka J, et al. Personal exposures to PM(2.5) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and their relationship to environmental tobacco smoke at two locations in Greece. J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2001;11(3):169–83.
Knecht U, Elliehausen HJ, Woitowitz HJ. Gaseous and adsorbed PAH in an iron foundry. Br J Ind Med. 1986;43(12):834–8.
Liu HH, Yang HH, Chou CD, Lin MH, Chen HL. Risk assessment of gaseous/particulate phase PAH exposure in foundry industry. J Hazard Mater. 2010;181(1–3):105–11.
Luceri F, Pieraccini G, Moneti G, Dolara P. Primary aromatic amines from side-stream cigarette smoke are common contaminants of indoor air. Toxicol Ind Health. 1993;9(3):405–13.
Pleil JD, Vette AF, Rappaport SM. Assaying particle-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from archived PM2.5 filters. J Chromatogr. 2004;1033(1):9–17.
Penning TM. Human aldo-keto reductases and the metabolic activation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chem Res Toxicol. 2014;27(11):1901–17.
Grimmer G, Naujack KW, Dettbarn G. Gaschromatographic determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, aza-arenes, aromatic amines in the particle and vapor phase of mainstream and sidestream smoke of cigarettes. Toxicol Lett. 1987;35(1):117–24.
Guerin M, Jenkins RA, Tomkins BA. Mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke In: Eisenberg M, editor. The chemistry of environmental tobacco smoke: composition and measurement. Chelsea, MI: Lewis; 1992.
IARC. Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to human. IARC: Lyon; 2004.
Lodovici M, Akpan V, Evangelisti C, Dolara P. Sidestream tobacco smoke as the main predictor of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J Appl Toxicol. 2004;24(4):277–81.
Lee HL, Hsieh DP, Li LA. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette sidestream smoke particulates from a Taiwanese brand and their carcinogenic relevance. Chemosphere. 2011;82(3):477–82.
Zainol Abidin N, Zainal Abidin E, Zulkifli A, Karuppiah K, Ismail SNS, Nordin ASA. Electronic cigarettes and indoor air quality: a review of studies using human volunteers. Rev Environ Health. 2017;32(3):235–44.
Bock KW, Köhle C. The mammalian aryl hydrocarbon (ah) receptor: from mediator of dioxin toxicity toward physiological functions in skin and liver. Biol Chem. 2009;390(12):1225–35.
Fujii-Kuriyama Y, Kawajiri K. Molecular mechanisms of the physiological functions of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor, a multifunctional regulator that senses and responds to environmental stimuli. Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci. 2010;86(1):40–53.
Shimada T. Xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes involved in activation and detoxification of carcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2006;21(4):257–76.
Anttila S, Raunio H, Hakkola J. Cytochrome p450-mediated pulmonary metabolism of carcinogens: regulation and cross-talk in lung carcinogenesis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;44(5):583–90.
Jiang H, Shen YM, Quinn AM, Penning TM. Competing roles of cytochrome P450 1A1/1B1 and aldo-keto reductase 1A1 in the metabolic activation of (+/−)-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydro-benzo[a]pyrene in human bronchoalveolar cell extracts. Chem Res Toxicol. 2005;18(2):365–74.
Melendez-Colon VJ, Luch A, Seidel A, Baird WM. Comparison of cytochrome P450- and peroxidase-dependent metabolic activation of the potent carcinogen dibenzo[a,l]pyrene in human cell lines: formation of stable DNA adducts and absence of a detectable increase in apurinic sites. Cancer Res. 1999;59(7):1412–6.
Palackal NT, Burczynski ME, Harvey RG, Penning TM. The ubiquitous aldehyde reductase (AKR1A1) oxidizes proximate carcinogen trans-dihydrodiols to o-quinones: potential role in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon activation. Biochemistry. 2001;40(36):10901–10.
Denissenko MF, Pao A, Tang M, Pfeifer GP. Preferential formation of benzo[a]pyrene adducts at lung cancer mutational hotspots in P53. Science. 1996;274(5286):430–2.
Hussain SP, Amstad P, Raja K, et al. Mutability of p53 hotspot codons to benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE) and the frequency of p53 mutations in nontumorous human lung. Cancer Res. 2001;61(17):6350–5.
Yoon JH, Smith LE, Feng Z, Tang M, Lee CS, Pfeifer GP. Methylated CpG dinucleotides are the preferential targets for G-to-T transversion mutations induced by benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide in mammalian cells: similarities with the p53 mutation spectrum in smoking-associated lung cancers. Cancer Res. 2001;61(19):7110–7.
Köhle C, Bock KW. Coordinate regulation of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolisms by the ah receptor and Nrf2. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007;73(12):1853–62.
Yeager RL, Reisman SA, Aleksunes LM, Klaassen CD. Introducing the “TCDD-inducible AhR-Nrf2 gene battery”. Toxicol Sci. 2009;111(2):238–46.
Itoh K, Chiba T, Takahashi S, et al. An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;236(2):313–22.
Jaiswal AK. Regulation of genes encoding NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;29(3–4):254–62.
Menegon S, Columbano A, Giordano S. The dual roles of NRF2 in cancer. Trends Mol Med. 2016;22(7):578–93.
Shibata T, Ohta T, Tong KI, et al. Cancer related mutations in NRF2 impair its recognition by Keap1-Cul3 E3 ligase and promote malignancy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(36):13568–73.
Singh A, Misra V, Thimmulappa RK, et al. Dysfunctional KEAP1-NRF2 interaction in non-small-cell lung cancer. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e420.
Ruosaari ST, Nymark PE, Aavikko MM, et al. Aberrations of chromosome 19 in asbestos-associated lung cancer and in asbestos-induced micronuclei of bronchial epithelial cells in vitro. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(5):913–7.
Wang R, An J, Ji F, Jiao H, Sun H, Zhou D. Hypermethylation of the Keap1 gene in human lung cancer cell lines and lung cancer tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;373(1):151–4.
Hayes JD, McMahon M. NRF2 and KEAP1 mutations: permanent activation of an adaptive response in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34(4):176–88.
Kotlo KU, Yehiely F, Efimova E, et al. Nrf2 is an inhibitor of the Fas pathway as identified by Achilles’ Heel method, a new function-based approach to gene identification in human cells. Oncogene. 2003;22(6):797–806.
Morito N, Yoh K, Itoh K, et al. Nrf2 regulates the sensitivity of death receptor signals by affecting intracellular glutathione levels. Oncogene. 2003;22(58):9275–81.
Niture SK, Jaiswal AK. Nrf2 protein up-regulates antiapoptotic protein Bcl-2 and prevents cellular apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(13):9873–86.
Niture SK, Jaiswal AK. Nrf2-induced antiapoptotic Bcl-xL protein enhances cell survival and drug resistance. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;57:119–31.
Kim SY, Kim TJ, Lee KY. A novel function of peroxiredoxin 1 (Prx-1) in apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1)-mediated signaling pathway. FEBS Lett. 2008;582(13):1913–8.
Wikman H, Ruosaari S, Nymark P, et al. Gene expression and copy number profiling suggests the importance of allelic imbalance in 19p in asbestos-associated lung cancer. Oncogene. 2007;26(32):4730–7.
Valko M, Rhodes CJ, Moncol J, Izakovic M, Mazur M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem Biol Interact. 2006;160(1):1–40.
Kasai H, Iwamoto-Tanaka N, Miyamoto T, et al. Life style and urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative DNA damage: effects of exercise, working conditions, meat intake, body mass index, and smoking. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2001;92(1):9–15.
Tamae K, Kawai K, Yamasaki S, et al. Effect of age, smoking and other lifestyle factors on urinary 7-methylguanine and 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine. Cancer Sci. 2009;100(4):715–21.
Collins AR. The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations. Mol Biotechnol. 2004;26(3):249–61.
Tarantini A, Maitre A, Lefebvre E, et al. Relative contribution of DNA strand breaks and DNA adducts to the genotoxicity of benzo[a]pyrene as a pure compound and in complex mixtures. Mutat Res. 2009;671(1–2):67–75.
IARC. Arsenic, metals, fibres, and dusts. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to human. Lyon: IARC; 2012.
Huang C, Ke Q, Costa M, Shi X. Molecular mechanisms of arsenic carcinogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;255(1–2):57–66.
Cohen SM, Arnold LL, Eldan M, Lewis AS, Beck BD. Methylated arsenicals: the implications of metabolism and carcinogenicity studies in rodents to human risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2006;36(2):99–133.
Kitchin KT. Recent advances in arsenic carcinogenesis: modes of action, animal model systems, and methylated arsenic metabolites. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;172(3):249–61.
Styblo M, Del Razo LM, Vega L, et al. Comparative toxicity of trivalent and pentavalent inorganic and methylated arsenicals in rat and human cells. Arch Toxicol. 2000;74(6):289–99.
Shi H, Shi X, Liu KJ. Oxidative mechanism of arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2004;255(1–2):67–78.
Yamanaka K, Takabayashi F, Mizoi M, An Y, Hasegawa A, Okada S. Oral exposure of dimethylarsinic acid, a main metabolite of inorganic arsenics, in mice leads to an increase in 8-Oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine level, specifically in the target organs for arsenic carcinogenesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;287(1):66–70.
Lau A, Whitman SA, Jaramillo MC, Zhang DD. Arsenic-mediated activation of the Nrf2-Keap1 antioxidant pathway. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2013;27(2):99–105.
Matsui M, Nishigori C, Toyokuni S, et al. The role of oxidative DNA damage in human arsenic carcinogenesis: detection of 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine in arsenic-related Bowen's disease. J Invest Dermatol. 1999;113(1):26–31.
Wanibuchi H, Hori T, Meenakshi V, et al. Promotion of rat hepatocarcinogenesis by dimethylarsinic acid: association with elevated ornithine decarboxylase activity and formation of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine in the liver. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1997;88(12):1149–54.
Barrett JC, Lamb PW, Wang TC, Lee TC. Mechanisms of arsenic-induced cell transformation. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1989;21:421–9.
Dong JT, Luo XM. Arsenic-induced DNA-strand breaks associated with DNA-protein crosslinks in human fetal lung fibroblasts. Mutat Res. 1993;302(2):97–102.
Hei TK, Liu SX, Waldren C. Mutagenicity of arsenic in mammalian cells: role of reactive oxygen species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(14):8103–7.
Nakamuro K, Sayato Y. Comparative studies of chromosomal aberration induced by trivalent and pentavalent arsenic. Mutat Res. 1981;88(1):73–80.
Hartmann A, Speit G. Comparative investigations of the genotoxic effects of metals in the single cells gel (SCG) assay and the sister chromatid exchange (SCE) test. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1994;23(4):299–305.
Lee-Chen SF, Gurr JR, Lin IB, Jan KY. Arsenite enhances DNA double-strand breaks and cell killing of methyl methanesulfonate-treated cells by inhibiting the excision of alkali-labile sites. Mutat Res. 1993;294(1):21–8.
Mouron SA, Golijow CD, Dulout FN. DNA damage by cadmium and arsenic salts assessed by the single cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat Res. 2001;498(1–2):47–55.
Wang TS, Hsu TY, Chung CH, Wang AS, Bau DT, Jan KY. Arsenite induces oxidative DNA adducts and DNA-protein cross-links in mammalian cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2001;31(3):321–30.
Hu Y, Su L, Snow ET. Arsenic toxicity is enzyme specific and its affects on ligation are not caused by the direct inhibition of DNA repair enzymes. Mutat Res. 1998;408(3):203–18.
Li JH, Rossman TG. Inhibition of DNA ligase activity by arsenite: a possible mechanism of its comutagenesis. Mol Toxicol. 1989a;2:1):1–9.
Li JH, Rossman TG. Mechanism of comutagenesis of sodium arsenite with n-methyl-n-nitrosourea. Biol Trace Elem Res. 1989b;21:373–81.
Lynn S, Lai HT, Gurr JR, Jan KY. Arsenite retards DNA break rejoining by inhibiting DNA ligation. Mutagenesis. 1997;12(5):353–8.
Morales ME, Derbes RS, Ade CM, Ortego JC, Stark J, Deininger PL, Roy-Engel AM. Heavy metal exposure influences double strand break DNA repair outcomes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151367.
Wu C-L, Huang L-Y, Chang CL. Linking arsenite- and cadmium-generated oxidative stress to microsatellite instability in vitro and in vivo. Free Radic Biol Med. 2017;112:12–23.
Guo HR, Wang NS, Hu H, Monson RR. Cell type specificity of lung cancer associated with arsenic ingestion. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(4):638–43.
Taeger D, Johnen G, Wiethege T, et al. Major histopathological patterns of lung cancer related to arsenic exposure in German uranium miners. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009;82(7):867–75.
Martinez VD, Buys TP, Adonis M, et al. Arsenic-related DNA copy-number alterations in lung squamous cell carcinomas. Br J Cancer. 2010;103(8):1277–83.
Martinez VD, Thu KL, Vucic EA, Hubaux R, Adonis M, Gil L, MacAulay C, Lam S, Lam WL. Whole-genome sequencing analysis identifies a distinctive mutational spectrum in an arsenic-related lung tumor. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(11):1451–5.
Arita A, Costa M. Epigenetics in metal carcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, chromium and cadmium. Metallomics. 2009;1(3):222–8.
Zhao CQ, Young MR, Diwan BA, Coogan TP, Waalkes MP. Association of arsenic-induced malignant transformation with DNA hypomethylation and aberrant gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(20):10907–12.
Zhou X, Sun H, Ellen TP, Chen H, Costa M. Arsenite alters global histone H3 methylation. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(9):1831–6.
Marsit CJ, Karagas MR, Schned A, Kelsey KT. Carcinogen exposure and epigenetic silencing in bladder cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1076:810–21.
Cui X, Wakai T, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K, Hirano S. Chronic oral exposure to inorganic arsenate interferes with methylation status of p16INK4a and RASSF1A and induces lung cancer in A/J mice. Toxicol Sci. 2006;91(2):372–81.
Chai CY, Huang YC, Hung WC, Kang WY, Chen WT. Arsenic salt-induced DNA damage and expression of mutant p53 and COX-2 proteins in SV-40 immortalized human uroepithelial cells. Mutagenesis. 2007;22(6):403–8.
Chen WT, Hung WC, Kang WY, Huang YC, Chai CY. Urothelial carcinomas arising in arsenic-contaminated areas are associated with hypermethylation of the gene promoter of the death-associated protein kinase. Histopathology. 2007;51(6):785–92.
Mass MJ, Wang L. Arsenic alters cytosine methylation patterns of the promoter of the tumor suppressor gene p53 in human lung cells: a model for a mechanism of carcinogenesis. Mutat Res. 1997;386(3):263–77.
Chanda S, Dasgupta UB, Guhamazumder D, et al. DNA hypermethylation of promoter of gene p53 and p16 in arsenic-exposed people with and without malignancy. Toxicol Sci. 2006;89(2):431–7.
Zhou X, Li Q, Arita A, Sun H, Costa M. Effects of nickel, chromate, and arsenite on histone 3 lysine methylation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;236(1):78–84.
Chervona Y, et al. Associations between arsenic exposure and global posttranslational histone modifications among adults in Bangladesh. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012;21(12):2252–60.
Sage AP, Minatel BC, Ng KW, Stewart GL, Dummer TJB, Lam WL, Martinez VD. Oncogenomic disruptions in arsenic-induced carcinogenesis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(15):25735–55.
Salnikow K, Zhitkovich A. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis: nickel, arsenic, and chromium. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21(1):28–44.
Humphries B, Wang Z, Yang C. The role of microRNAs in metal-induced cell malignant transformation and tumorigenesis. Food Chem Toxicol. 2016;98.(Pt A:58–65.
Pratheeshkumar P, Son Y-O, Divya SP, Wang L, Zhang Z, Shi X. Oncogenic transformation of human lung bronchial epithelial cells induced by arsenic involves ROS-dependent activation of STAT3-miR-21-PDCD4 mechanism. Sci Rep. 2016b;6:37227. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep37227.
Chiang HC, Tsou TC. Arsenite enhances the benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE)-induced mutagenesis with no marked effect on repair of BPDE-DNA adducts in human lung cells. Toxicol In Vitro. 2009;23(5):897–905.
Lee TC, Huang RY, Jan KY. Sodium arsenite enhances the cytotoxicity, clastogenicity, and 6-thioguanine-resistant mutagenicity of ultraviolet light in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Mutat Res. 1985;148(1–2):83–9.
Li JH, Rossman TG. Comutagenesis of sodium arsenite with ultraviolet radiation in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Biol Met. 1991;4(4):197–200.
Rossman TG, Uddin AN, Burns FJ, Bosland MC. Arsenite cocarcinogenesis: an animal model derived from genetic toxicology studies. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 5):749–52.
Rossman TG, Uddin AN, Burns FJ. Evidence that arsenite acts as a cocarcinogen in skin cancer. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198(3):394–404.
Tran HP, Prakash AS, Barnard R, Chiswell B, Ng JC. Arsenic inhibits the repair of DNA damage induced by benzo(a)pyrene. Toxicol Lett. 2002;133(1):59–67.
Wiencke JK, Yager JW. Specificity of arsenite in potentiating cytogenetic damage induced by the DNA crosslinking agent diepoxybutane. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1992;19(3):195–200.
Chen CL, Hsu LI, Chiou HY, et al. Ingested arsenic, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk: a follow-up study in arseniasis-endemic areas in Taiwan. JAMA. 2004;292(24):2984–90.
Ferreccio C, Gonzalez C, Milosavjlevic V, Marshall G, Sancha AM, Smith AH. Lung cancer and arsenic concentrations in drinking water in Chile. Epidimiology. 2000;11(6):673–9.
Chen CL, Chiou HY, Hsu LI, Hsueh YM, Wu MM, Chen CJ. Ingested arsenic, characteristics of well water consumption and risk of different histological types of lung cancer in northeastern Taiwan. Environ Res. 2010a;110(5):455–62.
Chen H, Giri NC, Zhang R, et al. Nickel ions inhibit histone demethylase JMJD1A and DNA repair enzyme ABH2 by replacing the ferrous iron in the catalytic centers. J Biol Chem. 2010b;285(10):7374–83.
Chen H, Kluz T, Zhang R, Costa M. Hypoxia and nickel inhibit histone demethylase JMJD1A and repress Spry2 expression in human bronchial epithelial BEAS-2B cells. Carcinogenesis. 2010c;31(12):2136–44.
Lee HL, Chang LW, Wu JP, et al. Enhancements of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) metabolism and carcinogenic risk via NNK/arsenic interaction. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2008;227(1):108–14.
Wu JP, Chang LW, Yao HT, et al. Involvement of oxidative stress and activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor in elevation of CYP1A1 expression and activity in lung cells and tissues by arsenic: an in vitro and in vivo study. Toxicol Sci. 2009;107(2):385–93.
Hollins DM, McKinley MA, Williams C, et al. Beryllium and lung cancer: a weight of evidence evaluation of the toxicological and epidemiological literature. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2009;39(Suppl 1):1–32.
Gordon T, Bowser D. Beryllium: genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Mutat Res. 2003;533(1–2):99–105.
Belinsky SA, Snow SS, Nikula KJ, Finch GL, Tellez CS, Palmisano WA. Aberrant CpG island methylation of the p16(INK4a) and estrogen receptor genes in rat lung tumors induced by particulate carcinogens. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23(2):335–9.
Joseph P. Mechanisms of cadmium carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238(3):272–9.
Kairdolf BA, Smith AM, Stokes TH, Wang AN, Young AN, Nie S. Semiconductor quantum dots for bioimaging and biodiagnostic applications. Annu Rev Anal Chem. 2013;6:143–62.
Zheng W, Xu Y-M, Wu D-D, Yao Y, Liang Z-L, Tan HW, Lau ATY. Acute and chronic cadmium telluride quantum dots-exposed human bronchial epithelial cells: the effects of particle sizes on their cytotoxicity and carcinogenicity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;495(1):899–903.
Pääkkö P, Anttila S, Kokkonen P, Kalliomäki PL. Cadmium in lung tissue as marker for smoking. Lancet. 1988;1(8583):477.
Liu J, Qu W, Kadiiska MB. Role of oxidative stress in cadmium toxicity and carcinogenesis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;238(3):209–14.
Misra RR, Page JE, Smith GT, Waalkes MP, Dipple A. Effect of cadmium exposure on background and anti-5 methylchrysene-1,2-dihydrodiol 3,4-epoxide-induced mutagenesis in the supF gene of pS189 in human Ad293 cells. Chem Res Toxicol. 1998a;11(3):211–6.
Misra RR, Smith GT, Waalkes MP. Evaluation of the direct genotoxic potential of cadmium in four different rodent cell lines. Toxicology. 1998b;126(2):103–14.
Ochi T, Ohsawa M. Participation of active oxygen species in the induction of chromosomal aberrations by cadmium chloride in cultured Chinese hamster cells. Mutat Res. 1985;143(3):137–42.
Price DJ, Joshi JG. Ferritin. Binding of beryllium and other divalent metal ions. J Biol Chem. 1983;258(18):10873–80.
Schnekenburger M, Talaska G, Puga A. Chromium cross-links histone deacetylase 1-DNA methyltransferase 1 complexes to chromatin, inhibiting histone-remodeling marks critical for transcriptional activation. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27(20):7089–101.
Nezis IP, Stenmark H. p62 at the interface of autophagy, oxidative stress signaling, and cancer. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;17(5):786–93.
Son YO, Pratheeshkumar P, Roy RV, Hitron JA, Wang L, Zhang Z, Shi X. Nrf2/p62 signaling in apoptosis resistance and its role in cadmium-induced carcinogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(41):28660–75.
Son YO, Wang L, Poyil P, Budhara A, Hitron JA, Zhang Z, Lee JC, Shi X. Cadmium induces carcinogenesis in BEAS-2B cells through ROS-dependent activation of P13K/AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;264(2):153–60.
Giaginis C, Gatzidou E, Theocharis S. DNA repair systems as targets of cadmium toxicity. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2006;213(3):282–90.
Mikhailova MV, Littlefield NA, Hass BS, Poirier LA, Chou MW. Cadmium-induced 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine formation, DNA strand breaks and antioxidant enzyme activities in lymphoblastoid cells. Cancer Lett. 1997;115(2):141–8.
O’Connor TR, Graves RJ, de Murcia G, Castaing B, Laval J. Fpg protein of Escherichia coli is a zinc finger protein whose cysteine residues have a structural and/or functional role. J Biol Chem. 1993;268(12):9063–70.
Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Waterland RA, Dill AL, Webber MM, Waalkes MP. Tumor suppressor gene inactivation during cadmium-induced malignant transformation of human prostate cells correlates with overexpression of de novo DNA methyltransferase. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(10):1454–9.
Takiguchi M, Achanzar WE, Qu W, Li G, Waalkes MP. Effects of cadmium on DNA-(Cytosine-5) methyltransferase activity and DNA methylation status during cadmium-induced cellular transformation. Exp Cell Res. 2003;286(2):355–65.
Huang D, Zhang Y, Qi Y, Chen C, Ji W. Global DNA hypomethylation, rather than reactive oxygen species (ROS), a potential facilitator of cadmium-stimulated K562 cell proliferation. Toxicol Lett. 2008;179(1):43–7.
Ding M, Shi X, Castranova V, Vallyathan V. Predisposing factors in occupational lung cancer: inorganic minerals and chromium. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2000;19(1–2):129–38.
Nickens KP, Patierno SR, Ceryak S. Chromium genotoxicity: a double-edged sword. Chem Biol Interact. 2010;188(2):276–88.
Liu K, Husler J, Ye J, et al. On the mechanism of Cr (VI)-induced carcinogenesis: dose dependence of uptake and cellular responses. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;222(1–2):221–9.
Liu KJ, Shi X. In vivo reduction of chromium (VI) and its related free radical generation. Mol Cell Biochem. 2001;222(1–2):41–7.
Holmes AL, Wise SS, Sandwick SJ, Wise JP Sr. The clastogenic effects of chronic exposure to particulate and soluble Cr(VI) in human lung cells. Mutat Res. 2006;610(1–2):8–13.
Wise JP Sr, Wise SS, Little JE. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of particulate and soluble hexavalent chromium in human lung cells. Mutat Res. 2002;517(1–2):221–9.
Zhitkovich A. Importance of chromium-DNA adducts in mutagenicity and toxicity of chromium(VI). Chem Res Toxicol. 2005;18(1):3–11.
O’Brien TJ, Ceryak S, Patierno SR. Complexities of chromium carcinogenesis: role of cellular response, repair and recovery mechanisms. Mutat Res. 2003;533(1–2):3–36.
Wakeman TP, Kim WJ, Callens S, Chiu A, Brown KD, Xu B. The ATM-SMC1 pathway is essential for activation of the chromium[VI]-induced S-phase checkpoint. Mutat Res. 2004;554(1–2):241–51.
Wakeman TP, Yang A, Dalal NS, Boohaker RJ, Zeng Q, Ding Q, Xu B. DNA mismatch repair protein Mlh1 is required for tetravalent chromium intermediate-induced DNA damage. Oncotarget. 2017;8(48):83975–85.
Hirose T, Kondo K, Takahashi Y, et al. Frequent microsatellite instability in lung cancer from chromate-exposed workers. Mol Carcinog. 2002;33(3):172–80.
Takahashi Y, Kondo K, Hirose T, et al. Microsatellite instability and protein expression of the DNA mismatch repair gene, hMLH1, of lung cancer in chromate-exposed workers. Mol Carcinog. 2005;42(3):150–8.
Rodrigues CF, Urbano AM, Matoso E, et al. Human bronchial epithelial cells malignantly transformed by hexavalent chromium exhibit an aneuploid phenotype but no microsatellite instability. Mutat Res. 2009;670(1–2):42–52.
Ewis AA, Kondo K, Lee J, et al. Occupational cancer genetics: infrequent ras oncogenes point mutations in lung cancer samples from chromate workers. Am J Ind Med. 2001;40(1):92–7.
Kondo K, Hino N, Sasa M, et al. Mutations of the p53 gene in human lung cancer from chromate-exposed workers. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;239(1):95–100.
Wei YD, Tepperman K, Huang MY, Sartor MA, Puga A. Chromium inhibits transcription from polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-inducible promoters by blocking the release of histone deacetylase and preventing the binding of p300 to chromatin. J Biol Chem. 2004;279(6):4110–9.
Sun H, Zhou X, Chen H, Li Q, Costa M. Modulation of histone methylation and MLH1 gene silencing by hexavalent chromium. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2009;237(3):258–66.
Ali AH, Kondo K, Namura T, et al. Aberrant DNA methylation of some tumor suppressor genes in lung cancers from workers with chromate exposure. Mol Carcinog. 2011;50(2):89–99.
Kondo K, Takahashi Y, Hirose Y, et al. The reduced expression and aberrant methylation of p16(INK4a) in chromate workers with lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2006;53(3):295–302.
Cano CE, Hamidi T, Sandi MJ, Iovanna JL. Nupr1: the Swiss-knife of cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2011;226(6):1439–43.
Chen D, Kluz T, Fang L, Zhang X, Sun H, Jin C, Costa M. Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) down-regulates acetylation of histone H4 at lysine 16 through induction of stressor protein Nupr1. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157317. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157317.
He J, Qian X, Carpenter R, Xu Q, Wang L, Qi Y, Wang ZX, Liu LZ, Jiang BH. Repression of miR-143 mediates cr(VI)-induced tumor angiogenesis via IGF-IR/IRS1/ERK/IL-8 pathway. Toxicol Sci. 2013;134(1):26–38.
Pratheeshkumar P, Son Y-O, Divya SP, Turcios L, Roy RV, Hitron JA, Wang L, Kim D, Dai J, Asha P, Zhang Z, Shi X. Hexavalent chromium induces malignant transformation of human lung bronchial epithelial cells via ROS-dependent activation of miR-21-PDCD4 signaling. Oncotarget. 2016a;7(32):51193–210.
Vincent JH, Werner MA. Critical evaluation of historical occupational aerosol exposure records: applications to nickel and lead. Ann Occup Hyg. 2003;47(1):49–59.
Lu H, Shi X, Costa M, Huang C. Carcinogenic effect of nickel compounds. Mol Cell Biochem. 2005;279(1–2):45–67.
Barceloux DG. Nickel. J Toxicol. 1999;37(2):239–58.
Biggart NW, Costa M. Assessment of the uptake and mutagenicity of nickel chloride in salmonella tester strains. Mutat Res. 1986;175(4):209–15.
Fletcher GG, Rossetto FE, Turnbull JD, Nieboer E. Toxicity, uptake, and mutagenicity of particulate and soluble nickel compounds. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(Suppl 3):69–79.
Kargacin B, Klein CB, Costa M. Mutagenic responses of nickel oxides and nickel sulfides in Chinese hamster V79 cell lines at the xanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase locus. Mutat Res. 1993;300(1):63–72.
Patierno SR, Dirscherl LA, Xu J. Transformation of rat tracheal epithelial cells to immortal growth variants by particulate and soluble nickel compounds. Mutat Res. 1993;300(3–4):179–93.
Tveito G, Hansteen IL, Dalen H, Haugen A. Immortalization of normal human kidney epithelial cells by nickel(II). Cancer Res. 1989;49(7):1829–35.
Costa M. Molecular mechanisms of nickel carcinogenesis. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1991;31:321–37.
Das KK, Buchner V. Effect of nickel exposure on peripheral tissues: role of oxidative stress in toxicity and possible protection by ascorbic acid. Rev Environ Health. 2007;22(2):157–73.
Das KK, Das SN, Dhundasi SA. Nickel, its adverse health effects & oxidative stress. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128(4):412–25.
Higinbotham KG, Rice JM, Diwan BA, Kasprzak KS, Reed CD, Perantoni AO. GGT to GTT transversions in codon 12 of the K-ras oncogene in rat renal sarcomas induced with nickel subsulfide or nickel subsulfide/iron are consistent with oxidative damage to DNA. Cancer Res. 1992;52(17):4747–51.
Kawanishi S, Oikawa S, Inoue S, Nishino K. Distinct mechanisms of oxidative DNA damage induced by carcinogenic nickel subsulfide and nickel oxides. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(Suppl 5):789–91.
Wu S, Bai YN, Pu HQ, He J, Zheng TZ, Li HY, Dai M, Cheng N. Dynamic changes in DNA damage and repair biomarkers with employment length among nickel smelting workers. Biomed Environ Sci. 2015;28(9):679–82.
Son Y-O, Pratheeshkumar P, Divya SP, Zhang Z, Shi X. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 enhances carcinogenesis by suppressing apoptosis and promoting autophagy in nickel-transformed cells. J Biol Chem. 2017;292(20):8315–30.
Lee YW, Klein CB, Kargacin B, et al. Carcinogenic nickel silences gene expression by chromatin condensation and DNA methylation: a new model for epigenetic carcinogens. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15(5):2547–57.
Sutherland JE, Costa M. Epigenetics and the environment. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;983:151–60.
Ellen TP, Kluz T, Harder ME, Xiong J, Costa M. Heterochromatinization as a potential mechanism of nickel-induced carcinogenesis. Biochemistry. 2009;48(21):4626–32.
Cameron KS, Buchner V, Tchounwou PB. Exploring the molecular mechanisms of nickel-induced genotoxicity and carcinogenicity: a literature review. Rev Environ Health. 2011;26(2):81–92.
Kang J, Zhang Y, Chen J, et al. Nickel-induced histone hypoacetylation: the role of reactive oxygen species. Toxicol Sci. 2003;74(2):279–86.
Yan Y, Kluz T, Zhang P, Chen HB, Costa M. Analysis of specific lysine histone H3 and H4 acetylation and methylation status in clones of cells with a gene silenced by nickel exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003;190(3):272–7.
Chen H, Ke Q, Kluz T, Yan Y, Costa M. Nickel ions increase histone H3 lysine 9 dimethylation and induce transgene silencing. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(10):3728–37.
Jose CC, Xu B, Jagannathan L, Trac C, Mallela RK, Hattori T, Lai D, Koide S, Schones DE, Cuddapah S. Epigenetic dysregulation by nickel through repressive chromatin disruption. PNAS. 2014;111(40):14631–6.
Govindarajan B, Klafter R, Miller MS, et al. Reactive oxygen-induced carcinogenesis causes hypermethylation of p16(Ink4a) and activation of MAP kinase. Mol Med. 2002;8:1):1–8.
Zhang J, Zhang J, Li M, et al. Methylation of RAR-beta2, RASSF1A, and CDKN2A genes induced by nickel subsulfide and nickel-carcinogenesis in rats. Biomed Environ Sci. 2011;24(2):163–71.
Arita A, Niu J, Qu Q, Zhao N, Ruan Y, Nadas A, Chervona Y, Wu F, Sun H, Hayes RB, Costa M. Global levels of histone modifications in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of subjects with exposure to nickel. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(2):198–203.
Brocato J, Costa M. 10th NTES conference: nickel and arsenic compounds alter the epigenome of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2015;31:209–13.
Ma L, Bai Y, Pu H, Gou F, Dai M, Wang H, He J, Zheng T, Cheng N. Histone methylation in nickel-smelting industrial workers. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0140339. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140339.
Salnikow K, Davidson T, Zhang Q, Chen LC, Su W, Costa M. The involvement of hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1-dependent pathway in nickel carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2003;63(13):3524–30.
Chen H, Costa M. Iron- and 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases: an emerging group of molecular targets for nickel toxicity and carcinogenicity. Biometals. 2009;22(1):191–6.
Kang GS, Li Q, Chen H, Costa M. Effect of metal ions on HIF-1alpha and Fe homeostasis in human A549 cells. Mutat Res. 2006;610(1–2):48–55.
Witkiewicz-Kucharczyk A, Bal W. Damage of zinc fingers in DNA repair proteins, a novel molecular mechanism in carcinogenesis. Toxicol Lett. 2006;162(1):29–42.
Scanlon SE, Scanlon CD, Hegan DC, Sulkowski PL, Glazer PM. Nickel induces transcriptional down-regulation of DNA repair pathways in tumorigenic and non-tumorigenic lung cells. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38(6):627–37.
Brugge D, de Lemos JL, Oldmixon B. Exposure pathways and health effects associated with chemical and radiological toxicity of natural uranium: a review. Rev Environ Health. 2005;20(3):177–93.
Jostes RF. Genetic, cytogenetic, and carcinogenic effects of radon: a review. Mutat Res. 1996;340(2–3):125–39.
Kusiak RA, Ritchie AC, Muller J, Springer J. Mortality from lung cancer in Ontario uranium miners. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50(10):920–8.
Bao CY, Ma AH, Evans HH, et al. Molecular analysis of hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase gene deletions induced by alpha- and X-radiation in human lymphoblastoid cells. Mutat Res. 1995;326(1):1–15.
Richardson D, Sugiyama H, Nishi N, et al. Ionizing radiation and leukemia mortality among Japanese Atomic Bomb Survivors, 1950-2000. Radiat Res. 2009a;172(3):368–82.
Richardson DB, Sugiyama H, Wing S, et al. Positive associations between ionizing radiation and lymphoma mortality among men. Am J Epidemiol. 2009b;169(8):969–76.
Richardson DB. Exposure to ionizing radiation in adulthood and thyroid cancer incidence. Epidimiology. 2009a;20(2):181–7.
Richardson RB. Ionizing radiation and aging: rejuvenating an old idea. Aging. 2009b;1(11):887–902.
Ward JF. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1988;35:95–125.
Kadhim MA, Macdonald DA, Goodhead DT, Lorimore SA, Marsden SJ, Wright EG. Transmission of chromosomal instability after plutonium alpha-particle irradiation. Nature. 1992;355(6362):738–40.
Liu D, Momoi H, Li L, Ishikawa Y, Fukumoto M. Microsatellite instability in thorotrast-induced human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2002;102(4):366–71.
Chaudhry MA. Base excision repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage in G1 and G2 cell cycle phases. Cancer Cell Int. 2007;7:15.
Hussain SP, Kennedy CH, Amstad P, Lui H, Lechner JF, Harris CC. Radon and lung carcinogenesis: mutability of p53 codons 249 and 250 to 238Pu alpha-particles in human bronchial epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis. 1997;18(1):121–5.
Taylor JA, Watson MA, Devereux TR, Michels RY, Saccomanno G, Anderson M. p53 mutation hotspot in radon-associated lung cancer. Lancet. 1994;343(8889):86–7.
Su S, Jin Y, Zhang W, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation of p16(INK4a) and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase genes in workers at a Chinese uranium mine. J Occup Health. 2006;48(4):261–6.
Gilliland FD, Harms HJ, Crowell RE, Li YF, Willink R, Belinsky SA. Glutathione S-transferase P1 and NADPH quinone oxidoreductase polymorphisms are associated with aberrant promoter methylation of P16(INK4a) and O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in sputum. Cancer Res. 2002;62(8):2248–52.
Belinsky SA, Klinge DM, Liechty KC, et al. Plutonium targets the p16 gene for inactivation by promoter hypermethylation in human lung adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25(6):1063–7.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Anttila, S. (2020). Lung Cancer: Mechanisms and Markers—Carcinogens Other Than Asbestos. In: Anttila, S., Boffetta, P. (eds) Occupational Cancers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30766-0_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-30765-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-30766-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)