Abstract
How to obtain the sharp constant of the Hardy–Littlewood inequality remains unsolved. In this paper, the new analytical technique is to convert the exact constant factor to the norm of the corresponding operator, the multiple Hardy–Littlewood integral operator norm inequalities are proved. As its generalizations, some new integral operator norm inequalities with the radial kernel on n-dimensional vector spaces are established. The discrete versions of the main results are also given.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Mathematics Subject Classification (2000) 47A30, 26D10
1 Introduction
Throughout this paper, we write
E n(α) is an n-dimensional vector space, when 1 ≤ α < ∞, E n(α) is a normed vector space. In particular, E n(2) is an n-dimensional Euclidean space \(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}\).
where, ω is a non-negative measurable function on E n(α). If ω(x) ≡ 1, we will denote L p(ω) by L p(E n(α)), and ∥f∥p,1 by ∥f∥p. Γ(α) is the Gamma function:
B(α, β) is the Beta function:
The celebrated Hardy–Littlewood inequality (see [1], Theorem 401 and [2,3,4]) asserts that if f and g are non-negative, and 1 < p < ∞, 1 < q < ∞, \( \frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}\geq 1 \), \(\lambda =2-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {1}{q}\), \(\delta <1-\frac {1}{p},\beta <1-\frac {1}{q}\), δ + β ≥ 0, and δ + β > 0, if \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\), then
Here, c denotes a positive number depending only on the parameters of the theorem (here p, q, δ, β). But Hardy was unable to fix the constant c in (1). We note that (1) is equivalent to
where,
Hence, c = ∥T 0∥ in (2) is the sharp constant for (1) and (2). Under the above conditions, Hardy–Littlewood [2] proved that there exists a positive constant c 1 such that
The following Hardy–Littlewood–P\(\acute {o}\)lya inequality was proved in [5] and [6]:
Theorem 1
Let f ∈ L p(0, ∞), g ∈ L q(0, ∞), \(1<p,q<\infty ,\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}>1\), \(0<\lambda <1,\lambda =2-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {1}{q}\), then
where,
Let
Then (5) is equivalent to
where, \(1<p<\infty ,1-\frac {1}{p}<\lambda <1\), \(\frac {1}{p_{1}}=\frac {1}{p}+\lambda -1\), c 2 is given by (6). For a function \(f\in L^{p}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\), 1 < p < ∞, define its potential of order λ as
Theorem 2 ([6, pp. 412–413])
There exists a constant c 3 depending only upon n, p, and λ, such that
where, \(\frac {1}{p_{2}}=\frac {1}{p}+\frac {\lambda }{n}-1\).
Theorem 3 ([7,8,9,10])
Let \(f\in L^{p}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\), \(g\in L^{q}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\), 1 < p, q < ∞, 0 < λ < n, \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}+\frac {\lambda }{n}=2\), then there exists a constant c 4 = c 4(p, λ, n) (depending only upon n, p, and λ), such that
where,
and S n is the surface areas of the unit sphere in \(\mathbb {R}^{n}\) . In particular, for \(p=q=\frac {2n}{2n-\lambda }\) ,
is the best possible constant.
But when p ≠ q, the best possible value of c 4 is also unknown.
In 2017, the author Kuang [14] established the norm inequality of operator T 2.
Theorem 4 ([11])
Let \(f\in L^{p}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\), \(g\in L^{q}(\mathbb {R}^{n})\), 1 < p, q < ∞, 0 < λ < n, δ + β ≥ 0, \(1-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {\lambda }{n}<\frac {\delta }{n}<1-\frac {1}{p}\), \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}+\frac {\lambda +\delta +\beta }{n}=2\), then there exists a constant c 5 = c 5(p, δ, β, λ, n), such that
Remark 1
Inequality (12) can be given an equivalent form
then the conditions \(1-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {\lambda }{n}<\frac {\delta }{n}<1-\frac {1}{p}\), \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}+\frac {\lambda +\delta +\beta }{n}=2\) are replaced by
The multiple Hardy–Littlewood integral operator T 3 defined by
Then (13) is equivalent to
But, the problem of determining the best possible constants in (13) and (15) remains unsolved. In this paper, the new analytical technique is to convert the exact constant factor to the norm c 5 = ∥T 3∥ of the corresponding operator T 3. Hence, we consider operator norm inequality (15). Without loss of generality, we may consider that the multiple Hardy–Littlewood integral operator T 4 defined by
and f be a nonnegative measurable function on \(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}\), thus, by the triangle inequality, we have
Let
where, ω is a nonnegative measurable weight function on \(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}\). If δ > 0, β > 0, λ − δ − β > 0, then
and therefore,
Thus, we may use the norms ∥T 5∥, ∥T 6∥ of the operator T 5, T 6 with the radial kernels to find the norm inequality of the multiple Hardy–Littlewood integral operator T 4. As their generalizations, we introduce the new integral operator T defined by
where, the radial kernel K(∥x∥α, ∥y∥α) is a nonnegative measurable function defined on E n(α) × E n(α), which satisfies the following condition:
Equation (19) includes many famous operators as special cases. In particular, for n = 1, we have
and
The kernel in (3)
satisfies (22). In 2016, the author Kuang [12] proved that if f ∈ L p(ω 0), g ∈ L q(ω 0), \(1<p<\infty , \frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\), ω 0(x) = x 1−λ, and
then
which is equivalent to
where, T 0 is defined by (3) and
We define ω 1 = x λ−1, then the above norm inequality is also equivalent to
The celebrated Hardy–Littlewood inequality (1) and (2) are important in analysis mathematics and its applications. In this paper, we give some new improvements and extensions of (24). As some further generalizations of the above results, the norm inequalities of the multiple integral operators with the radial kernels on n-dimensional vector spaces E n(α) are established. In particular, using new analytical techniques, we convert the exact constant factor we are looking for into the norm of the corresponding operator, under a somewhat different hypothesis, we get lower and upper bounds of the sharp constant of the multiple Hardy–Littlewood inequality. Finally, the discrete versions of the main results are also given in Sect. 6.
2 Main Results
Our main results read as follows.
Theorem 5
Let 1 < p, q < ∞, λ ≥ n > 1, \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}+\frac {\lambda }{n}=2\), \(0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q},0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}\), and
If \(f\in L^{p}(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}),f(x)\geq 0,x\in \mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}\), \(\omega (x)=\|x\|{ }_{2}^{p(\lambda -n)}\), then the multiple Hardy–Littlewood integral operator T 4 is defined by (16): \(T_{4}: L^{p}(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n})\rightarrow L^{p}(\omega )\) exists as a bounded operator and
where,
For n = 1, we have
Theorem 6
Let \(1<p,q<\infty ,\lambda =2-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {1}{q}\) , \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}, 0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q}\) , and
If f ∈ L p(0, ∞), f(x) ≥ 0, x ∈ (0, ∞), ω(x) = x p(λ−1), then the Hardy–Littlewood integral operator T 0 is defined by (3):T 0 : L p(0, ∞) → L p(ω) exists as a bounded operator and
where,
Corollary 1
Let \(1<p<\infty ,\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\), \(0\leq \delta <\frac {1}{p},0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}\), δ + β > 0, λ = 1. Iff ∈ L p(0, ∞), f(x) ≥ 0, x ∈ (0, ∞), then the integral operator T 0 is defined by (3): T 0 : L p(0, ∞) → L p(0, ∞) exists as a bounded operator and
As some further generalizations of the above results, we have
Theorem 7
Let 1 < p < ∞, 1 < q < ∞, δ, β ≥ 0, λ ≥ n, \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}+\frac {\lambda }{n}=2\), \(\omega (x)=\|x\|{ }_{\alpha }^{p(\lambda -n)}\), the radial kernel K(∥x∥α, ∥y∥α) satisfies (20).
-
(i)
If
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}(K(1,u))^{n/\lambda}u^{\frac{n}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1)+n-1}du<\infty, {} \end{aligned} $$(25)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{2}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}(K(1,u))^{\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})} u^{\frac{n(p-1)(q-1)}{\lambda q}-1}du<\infty, {} \end{aligned} $$(26)then the integral operator T is defined by (19):T : L p(E n(α)) → L p(ω) exists as a bounded operator and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}\leq c\|f\|{}_{p}. {} \end{aligned} $$(27)This implies that
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T\|=\sup_{f\neq0}\frac{\|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}}{\|f\|{}_{p}}\leq c, {} \end{aligned} $$(28)where,
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c=c_{1}^{(1-(1/p))}c_{2}^{1/p} . {} \end{aligned} $$(29) -
(ii)
If
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{(1-\frac{1}{p})n-1}du<\infty , {} \end{aligned} $$(30)then
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T\|\geq c_{3}. {} \end{aligned} $$(31)
In particular, for n = 1, by Theorem 7, we get
Theorem 8
Let 1 < p < ∞, 1 < q < ∞, δ, β ≥ 0, \(1\leq \lambda =2-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {1}{q}\), ω(x) = x p(λ−1), the radial kernel K(x, y) satisfies (22).
-
(i)
If
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=\int_{0}^{\infty}(K(1,u))^{1/\lambda}u^{\frac{1}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1)}du<\infty, {} \end{aligned} $$(32)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{2}=\int_{0}^{\infty}(K(1,u))^{\frac{p}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})} u^{\frac{(p-1)(q-1)}{\lambda q}-1}du<\infty, {} \end{aligned} $$(33)then the integral operator T is defined by (21):T : L p(0, ∞) → L p(ω) exists as a bounded operator and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}\leq c \|f\|{}_{p} . {} \end{aligned} $$(34)This implies that
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T\|=\sup_{f\neq0}\frac{\|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}}{\|f\|{}_{p}}\leq c , {} \end{aligned} $$(35)where,
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c=c_{1}^{(1-(1/p))}c_{2}^{1/p}. {} \end{aligned} $$(36) -
(ii)
If
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{-\frac{1}{p}}du<\infty, {} \end{aligned} $$(37)then
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T\|\geq c_{3}. {} \end{aligned} $$(38)
For λ = n, we have \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1,\) and by Theorem 7, we get
Theorem 9
Let 1 < p < ∞, 1 < q < ∞, \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1,\delta ,\beta \geq 0\), the radial kernel K(∥x∥α, ∥y∥α) satisfies:
(i) If
then the integral operator T is defined by (19): T : L p(E n(α)) → L p(E n(α)) exists as a bounded operator and
This implies that
where,
(ii) If
then,
In particular, for n = 1, by Theorem 9, we get
then by (42), (45), and (46), we get
Thus, we get the following
Corollary 2
Let \(1<p<\infty , \frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\), the kernel K(x, y) satisfies (22). Then the integral operator T is defined by (21): T : L p(0, ∞) → L p(0, ∞) exists as a bounded operator and
where \(\|T\|=c=\int _{0}^{\infty }K(1,u)u^{-(1/p)}du \) is the sharp constant.
3 Proofs of Theorems
We require the following lemmas to prove our results:
Lemma 1 ([4, 13])
If a k, b k, p k > 0, 1 ≤ k ≤ n,f is a measurable function on (0, ∞), then
We get the following Lemma 2 by taking a k = 1, b k = α > 0, p k = 1, 1 ≤ k ≤ n, in Lemma 1.
Lemma 2
Let f be a measurable function on (0, ∞), then
Proof of Theorem 7
-
(i)
Let
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}p_{1}=\frac{p}{p-1},\,\,q_{1}=\frac{q}{q-1}, \end{aligned}$$thus, we have
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\frac{1}{p_{1}}+\frac{1}{q_{1}}+(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})=1,\,\, \frac{p}{q_{1}}+p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})=1 . \end{aligned}$$By Hölder’s inequality, we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} T(f,x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}K(\|x\|{}_{\alpha},\|y\|{}_{\alpha})f(y)dy \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\{\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{(\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda})}K^{n/\lambda} (\|x\|{}_{\alpha},\|y\|{}_{\alpha})f^{p}(y)\}^{1/q_{1}} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \{K^{n/\lambda}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha}, \|y\|{}_{\alpha})\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})}\}^{1/p_{1}} \{ f(y) \}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})}dy \\ &\displaystyle \leq&\displaystyle \{\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda}} K^{n/\lambda}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha} , \|y\|{}_{\alpha})|f(y)|{}^{p}dy \}^{1/q_{1}} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \{ \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})} K^{n/\lambda}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha} , \|y\|{}_{\alpha})dy \}^{1/p_{1}} \|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle I_{1}^{1/q_{1}}\times I_{2}^{1/p_{1}}\times\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})},{} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(50)where,
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} I_{1}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{(\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda})} K^{n/\lambda}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha},\|y\|{}_{\alpha})|f(y)|{}^{p}dy, \\ I_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})} K^{n/\lambda}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha} , \|y\|{}_{\alpha})dy. \end{array} \end{aligned} $$In I 2, by using Lemma 2, and letting \(u=\|x\|{ }_{\alpha }^{-1}t^{1/\alpha }\), and use (20), (49), and (25), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} I_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-n}\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})} K^{n/\lambda}(1,\|y\|{}_{\alpha}\cdot \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-1})dy \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-n}\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}t^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda\alpha})} K^{n/\lambda}(1,t^{1/\alpha}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-1})\times t^{\frac{n}{\alpha}-1}dt \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})} \int_{0}^{\infty}K^{\frac{n}{\lambda}}(1,u)u^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})+n-1}du \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle c_{1}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(\frac{n}{q_{1}\lambda})}. {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(51)Hence, by (50) and (51), we conclude that
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}|T(f,x)|{}^{p}\omega(x)dx)^{1/p} \leq(\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}I_{1}^{\frac{p}{q_{1}}}I_{2}^{\frac{p}{p_{1}}} \|f\|{}_{p}^{p^{2}(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})}\omega(x)dx)^{1/p} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle c_{1}^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}}\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})} \{\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}(\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda}} K^{\frac{n}{\lambda}}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha}, \|y\|{}_{\alpha})|f(y)|{}^{p}dy)^{\frac{p}{q_{1}}} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\frac{pn}{p_{1}q_{1}\lambda}}\omega(x)dx \}^{1/p}. {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(52)Using the Minkowski’s inequality for integrals (see [3]):
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\{\int_{X}(\int_{Y}|f(x,y)|dy)^{p}\omega(x)dx \}^{1/p} \leq\int_{Y}\{ \int_{X}|f(x,y)|{}^{p}\omega(x)dx \}^{1/p}dy, \,\, 1\leq p<\infty, \end{aligned}$$and letting v = ∥y∥αt −(1∕α), we obtain
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}&\displaystyle \leq&\displaystyle c_{1}^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}}\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})} \{ \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda}}|f(y)|{}^{p} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle (\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}K^{\frac{pn}{q_{1}\lambda}}(\|x\|{}_{\alpha} ,\|y\|{}_{\alpha})\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\frac{pn}{p_{1}q_{1}\lambda}} \omega(x)dx)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p}}dy \}^{1/q_{1}} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle c_{1}^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}}\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})}\{\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)} \|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda}}|f(y)|{}^{p} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle ( \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}K^{\frac{pn}{q_{1}\lambda}}(1,\|y\|{}_{\alpha}\cdot\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-1}) \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\frac{pn}{q_{1}}-\frac{pn}{p_{1}q_{1}\lambda}+p(\lambda-n)}dx )^{\frac{q_{1}}{p}}dy \}^{\frac{1}{q_{1}}} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle c_{1}^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}}\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})} \{ \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda}} |f(y)|{}^{p} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \big( \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}K^{\frac{pn}{q_{1}\lambda}}(1,\|y\|{}_{\alpha}\cdot t^{-\frac{1}{\alpha}}) t^{-\frac{pn}{q_{1}\alpha}-\frac{pn}{\lambda\alpha p_{1}q_{1}}+\frac{p(\lambda-n)}{\alpha}} t^{\frac{n}{\alpha}-1}dt \big)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p}}dy \}^{\frac{1}{q_{1}}} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle c_{1}^{\frac{1}{p_{1}}}\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})} \{ \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{\frac{n}{p_{1}\lambda}}|f(y)|{}^{p} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \big( \|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\frac{pn}{q_{1}p_{1}\lambda}} \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}K^{\frac{pn}{q_{1}\lambda}}(1,v)v^{\frac{pn}{p_{1}q_{1}\lambda}-1}dv \big)^{\frac{q_{1}}{p}}dy \}^{\frac{1}{q_{1}}} \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle c_{1}^{1/p_{1}}c_{2}^{1/p}\|f\|{}_{p}^{p(1-\frac{\lambda}{n})}\|f\|{}_{p}^{\frac{p}{q_{1}}} =c_{1}^{(1-(1/p))}c_{2}^{1/p}\|f\|{}_{p}. \end{array} \end{aligned} $$Thus,
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega} \leq c\|f\|{}_{p}. {} \end{aligned} $$(53) -
(ii)
For proving (31), we take
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} f_{\varepsilon}(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(n/p)-\varepsilon}\varphi_{B^{c}}(x), \\ g_{\varepsilon}(x)&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (p\varepsilon)^{1/p_{1}}\{ \frac{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)}{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}\}^{1/p_{1}} \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\frac{n}{p_{1}}-(p-1)\varepsilon}\varphi_{B^{c}}(x), \end{array} \end{aligned} $$where, ε > 0, B = B(0, 1) = {x ∈ E n(α) : ∥x∥α < 1}, \(\varphi _{B^{c}}\) is the characteristic function of the set B c = {x ∈ E n(α) : ∥x∥α ≥ 1}, that is
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \varphi_{B^{c}}(x)=\left\{\begin{array}{c} 1,x\in B^{c}\\ 0,x\in B . \end{array} \right. \end{aligned}$$Thus, we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \|f_{\varepsilon}\|{}_{p}=\big(\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}} {p\varepsilon\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)}\big)^{1/p}, \\ &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \|g_{\varepsilon}\|{}_{p_{1}}^{p_{1}}=(p\varepsilon) (\frac{\Gamma^{n}(1/\alpha)}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)})^{-1} \int_{B^{c}}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-n-(p-1)p_{1}\varepsilon}dx \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (p\varepsilon)\frac{1}{\alpha}\int_{1}^{\infty}t^{-\frac{p\varepsilon}{\alpha}-1}dt=1. \end{array} \end{aligned} $$Using the sharpness in Hölder’s inequality (see [13]):
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}=\sup\{ |\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}T(f,x)g(x)(\omega(x))^{1/p}dx|: \|g\|{}_{p_{1}}\leq1 \}, \end{aligned}$$where, \(1<p<\infty ,\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{p_{1}}=1\), thus, if \(\|g\|{ }_{p_{1}}\leq 1\), then
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} |\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}T(f,x)g(x)\{\omega(x)\}^{1/p}dx| \leq\|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega} . {} \end{aligned} $$(54)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \|Tf_{\varepsilon}\|{}_{p,\omega}\geq\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}T(f_{\varepsilon},x) g_{\varepsilon}(x)\{\omega(x)\}^{1/p}dx \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}\int_{E_{n}(\alpha)}K(\|x\|{}_{\alpha},\|y\|{}_{\alpha}) f_{\varepsilon}(y)g_{\varepsilon}(x)\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{\lambda-n}dydx \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (p\varepsilon)^{1/p_{1}}\{\frac{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} {(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}\}^{1/p_{1}} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \int_{B^{c}}\{\int_{B^{c}}K(\|x\|{}_{\alpha},\|y\|{}_{\alpha}) \|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(n/p)-\varepsilon}dy \} \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\frac{n}{p_{1}}-(p-1)\varepsilon+\lambda-n}dx. {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(55)Letting \(u=t^{1/\alpha }\|x\|{ }_{\alpha }^{-1}\), and using (20), we have
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \int_{B^{c}}K(\|x\|{}_{\alpha},\|y\|{}_{\alpha})\|y\|{}_{\alpha}^{-(n/p)-\varepsilon}dy \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n}\Gamma(n/\alpha)}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\lambda} \int_{1}^{\infty}K(1,t^{1/\alpha}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-1}) t^{-(\frac{n}{p\alpha})-\frac{\varepsilon}{\alpha}+\frac{n}{\alpha}-1}dt \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-\lambda+\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon} \int_{\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-1}}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon-1}du. {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(56)We insert (56) into (55) and use Fubini’s theorem to obtain
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} &\displaystyle &\displaystyle \|Tf_{\varepsilon}\|{}_{p,\omega}\geq(p\varepsilon)^{1/p_{1}} \{\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}} {\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)}\}^{1/p} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \int_{B^{c}}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-p\varepsilon-n} (\int_{\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-1}}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon-1}du)dx \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (p\varepsilon)^{1/p_{1}}\{\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \}^{1/p} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon-1} (\int_{\beta(u)}^{\infty}\|x\|{}_{\alpha}^{-p\varepsilon-n}dx)du \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (p\varepsilon)^{1/p_{1}}\{\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \}^{(1/p)+1}\times\frac{1}{\alpha} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon-1} (\int_{\beta(u)}^{\infty}t^{-(p\varepsilon)/\alpha-1}dt)du \\ &\displaystyle =&\displaystyle (p\varepsilon)^{-(1/p)}\{\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}} {\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)}\}^{(1/p)+1} \\ &\displaystyle \times&\displaystyle \int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon-1} (\beta(u))^{-(p\varepsilon)/\alpha}du, \end{array} \end{aligned} $$where, \(\beta (u)=\max \{1,u^{-1}\}\). Thus, we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} \|T\|&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \sup_{f\neq0}\frac{\|Tf\|{}_{p,\omega}}{\|f\|{}_{p}} \geq\frac{\|Tf_{\varepsilon}\|{}_{p,\omega}}{\|f_{\varepsilon}\|{}_{p}} \\ &\displaystyle \geq&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-\varepsilon-1} (\beta(u))^{-(p\varepsilon)/\alpha}du. {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(57)By letting ε → 0+ in (57) and using Fatou lemma, we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\|T\|\geq\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{\frac{n}{p_{1}}-1}du=c_{3}. \end{aligned}$$
The proof is complete.
4 Some Applications
As applications, a large number of known and new results have been obtained by proper choice of kernel K. In this section we present some model applications which display the importance of our results.
Example 1
Let \(h:E_{n}(\alpha )\times E_{n}(\alpha )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{+}\) be a measurable function. K 7 is defined by
and let
If p, q, λ, and ω satisfy the conditions of Theorem 7, and
then by Theorem 7, we get
Setting h(u) = 1, we distinguish four cases:
-
(i)
The case n > 1. Let \(0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q}\), \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}\), and
then by (59), (60), and (61), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{1}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \{ B(\frac{n}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1-\beta)+n, 1-\frac{n}{\lambda}(\lambda-\delta-\beta)) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{n}{\lambda}(\lambda-\delta-\frac{1}{q}+1)-n, 1-\frac{n}{\lambda}(\lambda-\delta-\beta)) \}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(63)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \{B(\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p}), 1-\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-\beta)) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p}), 1-\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-\beta))\}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(64)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{3}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \{B(n(1-\frac{1}{p})-\beta,1-\lambda+\delta+\beta ) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B( \lambda-\delta-n(1-\frac{1}{p}),1-\lambda+\delta+\beta ) \}.{} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(65) -
(ii)
The case n = 1. Let \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}\),\(0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q}\),δ + β > 0, and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\max\{\delta+1-\frac{1}{p},\beta+1-\frac{1}{q}\}<\lambda< \min\{1+\delta+\beta,\frac{\delta+\beta}{1-\frac{1}{p(1-(1/q))}}\},\end{aligned} $$then by (59), (60), and (61), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=B(\frac{1}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1-\beta)+1,\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda} )+B(\frac{1}{\lambda}(1-\delta-\frac{1}{q}),\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda}), {} \end{aligned} $$(66)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle B(\frac{p}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p}), 1-(1-\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda})p(1-\frac{1}{q})) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(p(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\frac{1}{\lambda}(\delta+1-\frac{1}{p})), 1-(1-\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda})p(1-\frac{1}{q})), {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(67)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=B(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p},1-\lambda+\delta+\beta)+ B(\lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p},1-\lambda+\delta+\beta). {} \end{aligned} $$(68) -
(iii)
The case λ = n, this implies that \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\). Let \(0\leq \delta <\min \{\frac {1}{p},n-\frac {1}{q}\}\), \(0\leq \beta <\min \{\frac {1}{q},n-\frac {1}{p} \}\), n − 1 < δ + β, then by (59), (60), and (61), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{1}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \{ B(n-\frac{1}{p}-\beta,1-n+\delta+\beta) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{1}{p}-\delta,1-n+\delta+\beta)\}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(69)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)}\{ B(\frac{1}{q}-\beta,1-n+\delta+\beta) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(n-\delta-\frac{1}{q},1-n+\delta+\beta) \}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(70)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{3}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} \{B(\frac{n}{q}-\beta,1-n+\delta+\beta) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{n}{p}-\delta,1-n+\delta+\beta) \} . {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(71) -
(iv)
The case λ = n = 1. Let \(0\leq \delta <\frac {1}{p}\), \(0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}\), δ + β > 0, then by (69), (70), and (71), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T_{7}\|=B(\frac{1}{p}-\delta,\delta+\beta)+B(\frac{1}{q}-\beta,\delta+\beta). {} \end{aligned} $$(72)
Example 2
Let \(h:E_{n}(\alpha )\times E_{n}(\alpha )\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_{+}\) be a measurable function. K 8 is defined by
and let
If p, q, λ, and ω satisfy the conditions of Theorem 7, and
then by Theorem 7, we get
Setting h(u) = 1, we distinguish four cases:
-
(i)
The case n > 1. Let \(0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q},0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}\), and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\lambda>\max\{\beta+1-\frac{1}{q},\delta+n(1-\frac{1}{p})\}, \end{aligned}$$then by (74), (75), and (76), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} B(\frac{n}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1-\beta)+n,\frac{n}{\lambda} (\lambda-\delta+1-\frac{1}{q})-n), {} \end{aligned} $$(77)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{2}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} B(\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\frac{1}{p}-\beta), \frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p}) ), {} \end{aligned} $$(78)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} B(n(1-\frac{1}{p})-\beta, \lambda-\delta-n(1-\frac{1}{p})). {} \end{aligned} $$(79) -
(ii)
The case n = 1. Let \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}\), \(0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q}\), and \(\lambda >\max \{ \delta +1-\frac {1}{p},\beta +1-\frac {1}{q} \}\), then by (74), (75), and (76), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=B(\frac{1}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1-\beta)+1,\frac{1}{\lambda}(1-\delta-\frac{1}{q})), {} \end{aligned} $$(80)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{2}=B(\frac{p}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\frac{1}{p}-\beta), \frac{p}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p})), {} \end{aligned} $$(81)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=B(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p},\lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p}).{} \end{aligned} $$(82) -
(iii)
The case λ = n, this implies that \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\). Let \(0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}\), \(0\leq \delta <\min \{ \frac {n}{p},n-\frac {1}{q} \}\), then by (74), (75), and (76), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=c_{2}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} B(\frac{1}{q}-\beta ,n-\delta- \frac{1}{q}), {} \end{aligned} $$(83)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\frac{(\Gamma(1/\alpha))^{n}}{\alpha^{n-1}\Gamma(n/\alpha)} B(\frac{n}{q}-\beta , \frac{n}{p}-\delta), {} \end{aligned} $$(84)and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}\leq\|T_{8}\|\leq c_{1}. {} \end{aligned} $$(85) -
(iv)
The case λ = n = 1. Let \(0\leq \delta <\frac {1}{p}\), \(0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}\), α + β > 0, and \(\max \{ \beta +\frac {1}{p}, \delta +\frac {1}{q}\}<1\), then by (83), (84), and (85), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T_{8}\|=B(\frac{1}{p}-\delta , \frac{1}{q}-\beta). {} \end{aligned} $$(86)
5 Multiple Hardy–Littlewood Integral Operator Norm Inequalities
In Examples 1 and 2, setting h(u) = 1, α = 2, thus, E n(α) reduces to \(E_{n}(2)=\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}\), T 7, T 8 reduces to T 6, T 5, respectively. Assume \(f\in L^{p}(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n})\), \(f(x)\geq 0,x\in \mathbb {R}_{+}^{n}\), 1 < p, q < ∞, λ ≥ n, \(\delta ,\beta \geq 0 , \frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}+\frac {\lambda }{n}=2\). The multiple Hardy–Littlewood integral operator T 4 is defined by (16):\(T_{4}:L^{p}(\mathbb {R}_{+}^{n})\rightarrow L^{p}(\omega )\), where \(\omega (x)=\|x\|{ }_{2}^{p(\lambda -n)}\) and
We distinguish four cases:
-
(i)
The case n > 1. Let \(0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q}\), \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}\), and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\max\{ \beta+1-\frac{1}{q} ,\delta+n(1- \frac{1}{p} )\}<\lambda< \min\{ \frac{\delta+\beta}{1-(1/n)},\frac{\delta+\beta}{1-\frac{1}{pn(1-(1/q))}}\}, \end{aligned}$$then by (18), (63), (64) and (79), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}\leq\|T_{4}\|\leq c_{1}^{1-(1/p)}c_{2}^{1/p}, {} \end{aligned} $$(87)where
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{1}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{\pi^{n/2}}{2^{n-1}\Gamma(n/2)} \{B(\frac{n}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1-\beta)+n, 1-\frac{n}{\lambda}(\lambda-\delta-\beta)) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{n}{\lambda}(\lambda-\delta-\frac{1}{q}+1)-n,1-\frac{n}{\lambda} (\lambda-\delta-\beta)) \} , {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(88)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{\pi^{n/2}}{2^{n-1}\Gamma(n/2)} \{B(\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p}),1-\frac{pn}{\lambda} (1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-\beta) ) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p}), 1-\frac{pn}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(\lambda-\delta-\beta)) \} ,{} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(89)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\frac{\pi^{n/2}}{2^{n-1}\Gamma(n/2)}B(n(1-\frac{1}{p})-\beta, \lambda-\delta-n(1-\frac{1}{p})) . {} \end{aligned} $$(90) -
(ii)
The case n = 1. Let \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p},0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q}\), and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\max\{\delta+1- \frac{1}{p} ,\beta+1-\frac{1}{q}\}<\lambda< \frac{\delta+\beta}{1-\frac{1}{p(1-(1/q))}}, \end{aligned}$$then by (18), (66), (67) and (82), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}c_{3}\leq\|T_{4}\|\leq c_{1}^{1-(1/p)}c_{2}^{1/p}, \end{aligned}$$where,
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=B(\frac{1}{\lambda}(\frac{1}{q}-1-\beta)+1,\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda}) +B(\frac{1}{\lambda}(1-\delta-\frac{1}{q}),\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda}), {} \end{aligned} $$(91)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle B(\frac{p}{\lambda}(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p}), 1-(1-\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda})p(1-\frac{1}{q})) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(p(1-\frac{1}{q})(1-\frac{1}{\lambda}(\delta+1-\frac{1}{p})), 1-(1-\frac{\delta+\beta}{\lambda})p(1-\frac{1}{q})),{} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(92)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=B(1-\beta-\frac{1}{p}, \lambda-\delta-1+\frac{1}{p}). {} \end{aligned} $$(93) -
(iii)
The case λ = n, this implies that \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\). Let \(0\leq \delta <\frac {1}{p}\), \(0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}\), and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}\max\{\beta+\frac{1}{p} ,\delta+\frac{1}{q}\}<n<1+\delta+\beta, \end{aligned}$$then by (18), (69), (70), and (84), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned}c_{3}\leq\|T_{4}\|\leq c_{1}^{1-(1/p)}c_{2}^{1/p}, \end{aligned}$$where
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{1}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{\pi^{n/2}}{2^{n-1}\Gamma(n/2)}\{ B(n-\frac{1}{p}-\beta, 1-n+\delta+\beta) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(\frac{1}{p}-\delta,1-n+\delta+\beta) \}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(94)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \begin{array}{rcl} c_{2}&\displaystyle =&\displaystyle \frac{\pi^{n/2}}{2^{n-1}\Gamma(n/2)}\{B(\frac{1}{q}-\beta, 1-n+\delta+\beta) \\ &\displaystyle +&\displaystyle B(n-\delta-\frac{1}{q},1-n+\delta+\beta) \}, {} \end{array} \end{aligned} $$(95)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\frac{\pi^{n/2}}{2^{n-1}\Gamma(n/2)} B(\frac{n}{q}-\beta , \frac{n}{p}-\delta). {} \end{aligned} $$(96) -
(iv)
The case λ = n = 1. Let \(0\leq \delta <\frac {1}{p}\), \(0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}\),δ + β > 0, then by (18), (72), and (86), we get
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} B(\frac{1}{p}-\delta ,\frac{1}{q}-\beta)\leq \|T_{4}\| \leq B(\frac{1}{p}-\delta,\delta+\beta)+B(\frac{1}{q}-\beta,\delta+\beta). {} \end{aligned} $$(97)
We have thus also proved that Theorems 5 and 6 are correct.
6 The Discrete Versions of the Main Results
Let a = {a m} be a sequence of real numbers, we define
If ω(m) ≡ 1, we will denote l p(ω) by l p, and ∥a∥p,1 by ∥a∥p. Defining f, K by f(x) = a m, K(x, y) = K(m, n)(m − 1 ≤ x < m, n − 1 ≤ y < n), respectively, we obtain the corresponding series form of (21):
Then by Theorem 8, we get
Theorem 10
Let 1 < p < ∞, 1 < q < ∞, δ, β ≥ 0, δ + β > 0, \(1\leq \lambda =2-\frac {1}{p}-\frac {1}{q}\), ω(m) = m p(λ−1), the kernel K(m, n) satisfies
-
(i)
If
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{1}=\int_{0}^{\infty}(K(1,u))^{\frac{1}{\lambda}}u^{\frac{1-q}{\lambda q}}du<\infty , {} \end{aligned} $$(100)$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{2}=\int_{0}^{\infty}(K(1,u))^{\frac{p}{\lambda} (1-\frac{1}{q})}u^{\frac{(p-1)(q-1)}{\lambda q}-1}du<\infty, {} \end{aligned} $$(101)then the integral operator T is defined by (98): T : l p → l p(ω) exists as a bounded operator and
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|Ta\|{}_{p,\omega}\leq c \|a\|{}_{p} . {} \end{aligned} $$(102)This implies that
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T\|=\sup_{a\neq0}\frac{\|Ta\|{}_{p,\omega}}{\|a\|{}_{p}}\leq c , {} \end{aligned} $$(103)where
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c=c_{1}^{(1-(1/p))}c_{2}^{1/p} . {} \end{aligned} $$(104) -
(ii)
If
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} c_{3}=\int_{0}^{\infty}K(1,u)u^{-\frac{1}{p}}du<\infty , {} \end{aligned} $$(105)then
$$\displaystyle \begin{aligned} \|T\|\geq c_{3}. {} \end{aligned} $$(106)
For λ = 1, we have \(\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\) and by Theorem 10, we get
where \(c=\|T\|=\int _{0}^{\infty }K(1,u)u^{-(1/p)}du\) is the sharp constant. In particular, let
if \(0\leq \beta <1-\frac {1}{p}, 0\leq \delta <1-\frac {1}{q},\delta +\beta >0\), and
then by Example 1, we get
where c 1, c 2, and c 3 are defined by (66), (67), and (68), respectively.
If λ = 1, that is, \(0\leq \delta <\frac {1}{p}, 0\leq \beta <\frac {1}{q}, \delta +\beta >0 \), then by (72), we have
Remark 2
In 2016, the author Kuang [12] proved that if a = {a m}∈ l p(ω 0), b = {b n}∈ l q(ω 0), \(1<p<\infty ,\frac {1}{p}+\frac {1}{q}=1\), ω 0(m) = m 1−λ, and
then
where c 0 is defined by (23). Inequality (110) is equivalent to
where,
is the Hardy–Littlewood operator. We define ω 1(m) = m λ−1, then the above norm inequality is also equivalent to
Hence, (108) and (109) are new improvements and extensions of (112).
References
G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood, G. Pólya, Inequalities, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, London, 1952)
G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood, Some properties of fractional integrals (1). Math. Zeitschr. 27, 565–606 (1928)
J.C. Kuang, Applied Inequalities, 4th edn. (Shandong Science and Technology Press, Jinan, 2010)
D. Zwillinger, Handbook of Integration (Springer, New York, 1992)
G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood, G. Pólya, The maximum of a certain bilinear form. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. 2–25, 265–282 (1926)
E. DiBenedetto, Real Analysis (Birkhäuser, Boston, 2002)
E.H. Lieb, M. Loss, Analysis, 2nd edn. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2001)
E.H. Lieb, Sharp constants in the Hardy-Littlewood-Sobolev and related inequalities. Ann. Math. 118, 349–374 (1983)
G.H. Hardy, J.E. Littlewood, On certain inequalities connected with the calculus of variations. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 5, 34–39 (1930)
S.L. Sobolev, On a theorem of functional analysis. Mat. Sbornik (N.S.) 4, 471–479 (1938)
E.M. Stein, G. Weiss, Fractional integrals in n-dimensional Euclidean space. J. Math. Mech. 7, 503–514 (1958)
J.C. Kuang, Multiple weighted Orlicz spaces and applications, in Contributions in Mathematics and Engineering in Honor of Constantin Carathéodory, ed. by P.M. Pardalos, T.M. Rassias (Springer, Berlin, 2016). Chapter 18
J.C. Kuang, Real and Functional Analysis (continuation), vol. 2 (Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2015)
J.C. Kuang, Riesz potential operator norm inequalities and its generalizations. Acta Anal. Funct. Appl. 19(1), 33–47 (2017)
Acknowledgement
The author wishes to express his thanks to Professor Bicheng Yang for his careful reading of the manuscript and for his valuable suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuang, J.C. (2019). Multiple Hardy–Littlewood Integral Operator Norm Inequalities. In: Andrica, D., Rassias, T. (eds) Differential and Integral Inequalities. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 151. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27407-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27407-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27406-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27407-8
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)