Abstract
Germ cells transfer genetic materials from one generation to the next, which ensures the continuation of the species. Spermatogenesis, the process of male germ cell production, is one of the most productive systems in adult tissues. This high productivity depends on the well-coordinated differentiation cascade in spermatogonia, occurring via their synchronized cell division and proliferation. Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are responsible for maintaining the spermatogonial population via self-renewal and the continuous generation of committed progenitor cells that differentiate into spermatozoa. Like other stem cells in the body, SSCs are defined by their self-renewal and differentiation abilities. A functional transplantation assay, in which these biological properties of SSCs can be quantitatively evaluated, was developed using mice, and the cell surface characteristics and intracellular marker gene expression of murine SSCs were successfully determined. Another approach to elucidate SSC identity is a cell lineage-tracing experiment using transgenic mice, which can track the SSC behavior in the testes. Recent studies using both these experimental approaches have revealed that the SSC identity changed depending upon the developmental, homeostatic, and regenerative circumstances. In addition, single-cell transcriptomic analyses have further indicated the instability of marker gene expression in SSCs. More studies are needed to unify the results of the determination of SSC identity based on the functional properties and accumulating transcriptomic data of SSCs, to elucidate the functional interaction between SSC behavior and gene products and illustrate the conserved features of SSCs amidst their heterogeneity. Furthermore, the deterministic roles of distinct SSC niches under different physiological conditions in the SSC heterogeneity and its causal regulators must also be clarified in future studies.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Spermatogonial stem cells
- Germline stem cells
- Functional assay
- Stem cell transplantation
- Cell lineage-tracing
- Genetic-labeling
- Stem cell identity
- Stem cell markers
- Stem cell niche
- Self-renewal
- Differentiation
- Regeneration
- Spermatogonia
- Spermatogenesis
- Testis
Introduction
Spermatogenesis occurs in the seminiferous tubules in the testes, and it is presumed to be one of the most productive cell-renewing systems in the adult tissues. In males, millions of spermatozoa are produced daily since the onset of puberty until old age [1]. The high productivity of spermatogenesis is conserved among most animals; therefore, this process is advantageous for the continuation of the species. This high productivity depends on the well-coordinated differentiation cascade in spermatogonia, which occurs via their synchronized cell division and proliferation. Because one spermatocyte produces only four spermatids by reductive cell division, a continuous supply of large numbers of spermatocytes requires at least a quarter of the population of spermatogonia, which are the precursors of spermatocytes and represent mitotic cell populations in spermatogenesis [2].
In the testes, the basic structure of seminiferous tubules is formed by the epithelia of Sertoli cells and the surrounding peritubular myoid cells (Fig. 12.1). The tight junctions of Sertoli cells form the blood-testis barrier and separate the basal and adluminal compartments of the seminiferous tubules. The basal compartment contains spermatogonia, which are located on the basement membrane, and preleptotene spermatocytes. The adluminal compartment contains pachytene spermatocytes and subsequent haploid germ cells, including spermatids and spermatozoa, which are never exposed to the blood and lymph constituents. This is important to keep them separate from the immune system in order to avoid unwanted immune reactions against the haploid germ cells after meiotic recombination [3].
Spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs) are responsible for maintaining the spermatogonial population during reproductive life via self-renewal and the generation of daughter cells that commit to differentiation [4, 5]. Among various mammalian species, mouse spermatogenesis is the most intensely investigated, and thus, mice are the most established model for studying spermatogenesis in several mammals [6]. Although spermatogenesis in non-primate mammals is similar to mouse spermatogenesis, primate spermatogenesis, including that in humans, displays notable differences in the classification of spermatogonial cell populations and their differentiation process, compared to those in non-primates [7]. The biology of human SSCs is tremendously important in order to understand the unique human reproductive system and to develop new therapies for male infertility; however, the identity of human SSCs has not yet been unequivocally determined and still raises marked controversy among researchers [8]. Currently, our knowledge about mammalian SSCs has stemmed mainly from mouse studies. In addition, several critical experimental methods and approaches to elucidate stem cell behavior are only available in mouse-based systems. Therefore, this review focuses on mouse SSCs and discusses their heterogeneity.
Classical Spermatogonial Stem Cell Definition Based on Morphology
Spermatogonia are located in the basal compartment and on the basement membrane in the periphery of the seminiferous tubules (Fig. 12.1). They are classified into several subpopulations. At first, they were subdivided into type A and type B. Type A spermatogonia present no heterochromatin in the nuclei, whereas type B spermatogonia display heterochromatin. In mice, subsequently, spermatogonia of an intermediate (In) type were found; the nuclei of In spermatogonia contain a moderate amount of heterochromatin [2]. Type A spermatogonia form the initial population of cells that undergo spermatogenesis, followed by In and type B spermatogonia, which give rise to spermatocytes (Fig. 12.2). Type A spermatogonia are further subdivided into undifferentiated, A1, A2, A3, and A4 spermatogonia (Fig. 12.2). The six types of spermatogonia from A1 to type B are generated by one cell division each [9], and a single type B spermatogonium divides into two preleptotene spermatocytes. Thus, one A1 spermatogonium can generate 64 preleptotene spermatocytes, which eventually produce 256 spermatozoa. In each cell division, the two daughter cells do not separate completely and are connected by an intercellular bridge [10]. Because subsequent cell divisions are synchronized, their differentiation process proceeds in a well-coordinated manner.
The most immature type A spermatogonia are named undifferentiated spermatogonia, which are further subdivided into Asingle (As), Apaired (Apr), and Aaligned (Aal), based on their morphological characteristics (Fig. 12.2). An As cell represents a single or an isolated undifferentiated spermatogonium, while Apr cells are two interconnected undifferentiated spermatogonia with an intercellular bridge. Aal-4, Aal-8, Aal-16, and the rare Aal-32 comprise 4, 8, 16, and 32 undifferentiated spermatogonia, respectively, with intercellular bridges. These Aal spermatogonia differentiate into A1 spermatogonia without cell division; thus, theoretically, a single As spermatogonium can generate a maximum of 4096 or 8192 spermatozoa. However, because a significant number of germ cells undergo apoptosis during differentiation [11], this high yield of spermatozoa does not occur naturally.
The morphological analyses, in combination with cell kinetic studies via radioisotope labeling, whole mount analysis, and differentiation-arrest models, including models fed with vitamin A-deficient diets and those with cryptorchid testes, support the hypothesis that As spermatogonia are SSCs (As model) [4, 9]. When As spermatogonia divide, they have two options: one cell can either generate two As spermatogonia or two Apr spermatogonia. The former represents cell division for self-renewal, and the latter represents differentiation, which results in the generation of Aal-4, Aal-8, Aal-16, and Aal-32 following subsequent synchronized cell divisions. In adult testes, the number of SSCs is consistent; therefore, after a self-renewal cell division, only one As is maintained as an As spermatogonium, whereas the other undergoes differentiation and generates Apr by the subsequent cell division. In contrast, during the developmental phase after birth or regeneration phases after injury such as irradiation or chemotherapy, As spermatogonia in the testes must increase in number and repeat self-renewal cell divisions. In the As model, the generation of Apr is the first step of differentiation. Furthermore, the model suggests that As cells are assumed to only be derived from self-renewing cell divisions of As cells; therefore, As cells are the most primitive spermatogonia and have been exclusively considered as SSCs in the testes [12, 13]. It is not clear, however, whether all As have the ability to maintain and regenerate long-term spermatogenesis and whether non-As subpopulations such as Apr, Aal, or other spermatogonia have such a potential or occasionally behave as SSCs. Although the As model assumes that both Apr and Aal are irreversibly committed for differentiation, recent reports have observed fragmentation from long Aal to short Aal, Apr, and As, which accompanied dedifferentiation [14, 15]. The differentiation order of mouse spermatogonia is indicated in Fig. 12.2.
Spermatogonial Stem Cell Definition Based on Functional Transplantation
Stem cells are defined by their biological activity [16]; however, until 1994, a method to assess the stem cell activity was only available for murine hematopoietic stem cells. When testicular germ cells were introduced into germ cell-depleted seminiferous tubules, a particular cell population migrated and colonized the basement membrane and regenerated, resulting in donor-derived spermatogenesis [17] (Fig. 12.3). The reconstituted spermatogenesis continued throughout the lifespan of the host and successfully generated a progeny upon mating with females [18]. One spermatogenic colony in the recipient testes could be generated from a single colonized cell [19, 20]. These results demonstrated that the spermatogenic colony-forming cells had the ability to self-renew and differentiate into functional gametes, and the transplantation system served as a quantitative functional assay for SSCs [8]. This SSC transplantation system, in which both the self-renewal and differentiation activities of SSCs can be evaluated, is the second functional assay for stem cells, the first transplantation assay being bone marrow transplantation into recipients with hematopoietic destruction, for hematopoietic stem cells, which was established in 1961 [21].
Using the transplantation assay for SSCs in combination with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), the antigenic profile of SSCs, which is a phenotypic identity of SSCs, can be determined (Fig. 12.3). A series of studies using antibodies against various cell surface molecules have identified the ITGA6, ITGB1, THY1, EPCAM, MCAM, CD9, CD24, CDH1, and GFRA1 expressed on SSCs [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Because these molecules are also expressed on non-stem spermatogonia, no SSC-specific surface molecules have been identified. During the course of studies, to determine the surface phenotype of SSCs, negative results (no expression) have been found to be important. For example, SSC activity was concentrated in the major histocompatibility complex-1 (MHC-1)−- and KIT−-cell fractions [25]. MHC-1 is expressed in most somatic cells, whereas KIT is expressed in spermatogonia, differentiating from A1 to type B [29]. A combination of the positive and aforementioned negative markers has facilitated the identification of a specific subpopulation of testicular cells enriched for SSCs. In diploid testicular cells, MHC-1− KIT− cells represent undifferentiated spermatogonia, in which ITGA6, CD9, CDH1, MCAM1, and THY1 are expressed. THY1 was strongly expressed in a few somatic cells, including fibroblasts and T lymphocytes; however, its expression in a germ cell fraction was detected at a low level [25, 30]. A THY1+ ITGA6+ KIT− MHC-1− subpopulation comprises SSC activity-containing undifferentiated spermatogonia and is one of the most SSC-enriched subpopulations, in which 1 in 15–30 cells is assumed to be an SSC [25]. THY1 appeared to be heterogeneously expressed in ITGA6+ spermatogonia [30]. High SSC activity was detected in THY1+, whereas low SSC activity was detected in THY1− spermatogonia, indicating the heterogeneity of the cell surface phenotype of SSCs. In addition, THY1 expression on SSCs decreased gradually from neonates to adults, suggesting that the cell-surface phenotype of SSCs in infants and adults or in a proliferation phase and stable phase is different [30]. The regulatory mechanism of THY1 expression in undifferentiated spermatogonia needs to be determined.
The transplantation assay, in conjunction with FACS, can be utilized for investigating intracellular molecules expressed in transplantable SSCs (Fig. 12.3). To identify the SSCs via intracellular molecules, transgenic mice expressing noninvasive reporter genes, such as GFP, YFP, or RFP, under the regulatory elements of the genes of interest, are required. In most cases, a reporter gene is knocked-in to the original genomic locus or inserted into a large genomic fragment or bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clone containing regulatory sequences of the gene. Based on the reporter gene expression, subpopulations of spermatogonia can be isolated by FACS, and the SSC activity of these spermatogonia can be determined via the transplantation assay. Using this approach, it has been reported that Pou5f1 (Oct3/4), Sox2, Tert, and Id4 are expressed in SSCs [31,32,33,34]. Pou5f1 and Sox2 are transcription factors essential for pluripotency, and Tert is telomerase reverse transcriptase, which is expressed in self-renewing cells to ensure unlimited proliferation. Id4, a transcriptional repressor, was identified in SSC-enriched THY1+ undifferentiated spermatogonia from juvenile males [35]. The biological function of ID4 in the SSCs has not been elucidated. Nonetheless, determination of the cell surface phenotype of transplantable SSCs has made it possible to obtain SSC-enriched populations by FACS or magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) , which could be used for the identification of genes expressed in SSCs, such as Id4, by transcriptomic analyses. The transplantation assay for SSCs using reporter mice is a valuable approach to validate the functionality of the gene products with regard to the self-renewal and differentiation potential of SSCs.
These reporter gene-expressing transgenic mice can be used to assess the topographical distribution and cell identity of the reporter gene+ cells in seminiferous tubules. Histological analyses of adult Id4-GFP transgenic mice injected with an Id4-BAC clone revealed that the GFP signal in the testes was detected in a small subset of Zbtb16 (Plzf)+ undifferentiated spermatogonia (~2%), which were primarily As and a few Apr, and pachytene spermatocytes, indicating that Id4 could be an As marker [34]. Zbtb16 is a transcription repressor that is required for the maintenance of continuous spermatogenesis in adult males and is expressed in all undifferentiated spermatogonia [36,37,38]. Intriguingly, the histological and flow cytometric analyses of adult testes of Id4-GFP knock-in mice indicated a more widespread GFP expression, including that from ~30% of Zbtb16+ spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and spermatids [38, 39]. Although these results of the Id4-GFP knock-in mice were contrasting to those obtained for the Id4-BAC clone transgenic mice, which claimed that the major Id4-GFP+ cells in the testes were As, the expression of Id4-GFP in a minor subset of undifferentiated spermatogonia was commonly observed in both the Id4-GFP transgenic mouse lines. However, it should be noted that flow cytometric analysis of the Id4-BAC clone transgenic mice was performed in the developing testes (8 days postpartum; 8 dpp), which did not contain differentiated and haploid germ cells [40]; therefore, it is important to compare the flow cytometric data of the Id4-GFP+ cells in the adult testes of the Id4-BAC clone transgenic mice with those of the Id4-GFP+ cells in the adult testes of the Id4-GFP knock-in mice, to clarify the proportion of Id4+ cells in mouse testes.
Because it has been reported that SSCs and gonocytes, the precursor cells of SSCs, in postnatal testes could transform the pluripotent stem cells in culture [41,42,43,44], the expression of Pou5f1 and Sox2 , which are critical transcription factors for pluripotency, in SSCs, is of great interest. Although several Pou5f1 transgenic mice have been developed, two Pou5f1-GFP transgenic mouse lines developed by introducing an 18-kb genomic fragment containing the minimal promoter and proximal and distal enhancers (GOF18) or an 18-kb genomic fragment lacking the proximal enhancer sequences (GOF18∆PE) were used for the SSC transplantation assay [31, 45]. Either construct is sufficient for reproducing the endogenous gene expression pattern in the germline [46]. Almost all gonocytes in the neonatal testes of the two Pou5f1-GFP transgenic mice were GFP+; however, the GFP expression of the undifferentiated spermatogonia in juvenile testes (5–8 dpp) was heterogeneous [31, 38, 47]. While the Pou5f1-GFP+ cells from the developing testes contained transplantable SSCs, Pou5f1-GFP− cells also generated spermatogenic colonies, albeit at low numbers [31, 47]. Intriguingly, Pou5f1-GFP+ cells in the adult testes (GOF18∆PE) comprised Aal undifferentiated spermatogonia, KIT+ spermatogonia, and spermatids [38]. As and Apr undifferentiated spermatogonia in the mice were Pou5f1-GFP− cells. As expected, the Pou5f1-GFP− cells, which were basically Gfra1+, generated spermatogenic colonies following transplantation; however, the Pou5f1-GFP+ cells in adult testes, which had no As spermatogonia, also generated spermatogenic colonies [38]. The SSC activity in the Pou5f1-GFP− undifferentiated spermatogonia of the adult testes was threefold higher than that of the Pou5f1-GFP+ cells. Collectively, the expression of Pou5f1 in SSCs changes developmentally and does not associate faithfully with SSC activity.
To investigate Sox2 expression in SSCs, Sox2-GFP knock-in mice were generated [32]. In the adult testes of the Sox2-GFP mice, rare GFP+ cells were detected on the basement membrane of the seminiferous tubules of adult testes. However, the flow cytometric analysis of testicular cells from young Sox2-GFP mice (2-week-old) revealed twice as many KIT+ Sox2-GFP+ cells as KIT− Sox2-GFP+ cells, indicating that the differentiating spermatogonia expressed Sox2. In the transplantation assay, the KIT− Sox2-GFP+ cells isolated by FACS displayed SSC activity; however, the KIT+ Sox2-GFP+ cells did not generate any colonies, indicating that no transplantable SSCs existed in the KIT+ Sox2-GFP+ spermatogonia. The discrepancy in the results of the flow cytometric analysis and immunohistochemistry of GFP expression in the Sox2-GFP mouse testes remains unexplained; however, Sox2, a crucial transcription factor for pluripotency, is expressed in transplantable SSCs. Furthermore, these studies indicate that the expression patterns of Pou5f1 and Sox2 in transplantable SSCs are not correlated with each other.
Telomere maintenance is critical for self-renewal in stem cells [48]. In testicular germ cells of adult Tert-RFP mice, the Terthigh population comprised undifferentiated spermatogonia and KIT+-differentiating spermatogonia, whereas the Tertlow comprised KIT+ differentiated spermatogonia [33, 49]. Transplantation assay demonstrated that SSC activity was detected only in the Terthigh KIT− cell population. Although the Terthigh KIT− cells expressed homogenous ZBTB16, GFRA1 was heterogeneously expressed, and the whole-mount immunocytochemistry indicated that Terthigh ZBTB16+ GFRA1− cell population included the long and short chains of Aal undifferentiated spermatogonia. To address the SSC activity in the GFRA1+ and GFRA1− cells, the Terthigh KIT− cells were subdivided into the GFRA1+ and GFRA1− cells, and the transplantation assay was carried out [49]. The Terthigh KIT− GFRA1+ population produced threefold more spermatogenic colonies than the Terthigh KIT− GFRA1− cells, but the important point is that the Terthigh KIT− ZBTB16+ GFRA1− cells contained transplantable SSCs. Furthermore, the number of Terthigh KIT− GFRA1− cells was thrice the number of the Terthigh KIT− GFRA1+ cells; therefore, the total numbers of transplantable SSCs of the GFRA1+ and GFRA1− populations are comparable. Intriguingly, the GFRA1− cells converted to GFRA1+ following transplantation. These results indicate that transplantable SSCs are not limited in the As population, and they suggest that SSC niche factors dictate the conversion from Aal to As after transplantation.
Although the number of As spermatogonia in adult mice is estimated to be about 35,000 [50], the number of transplantable SSCs was estimated to be about 3000 [51]. The discrepancy of the numbers of As and transplantable SSCs suggest that not all As spermatogonia are transplantable SSCs; in other words, a small subset of As represent transplantable SSCs. Furthermore, considering the fact that some Apr and Aal possessed SSC activity, by which they could regenerate donor-derived spermatogenesis in the transplantation assay, the proportion of As among the 3000 transplantable SSCs would further decline.
Spermatogonial Stem Cell Definition Based on Genetic Lineage Tracing
Spermatogonial transplantation is a powerful approach to unequivocally identify SSCs existing in any donor cell population by assessing their self-renewal and differentiation activities. In the transplantation assay, however, SSCs are colonized in the infertile recipient testes, in which the germ cells were depleted by Busulfan, an alkylating agent, or absent due to a congenital genetic defect, such as Kit mutation . Because donor-derived spermatogenesis is regenerated in the germ cell-depleted microenvironments, the SSCs identified by the transplantation assay are likely to represent those under a regeneration condition. It is important to understand the SSC identity and behavior under homeostatic conditions such as those in normal adult testes. To address this, a cell lineage-labeling system using transgenic mice has been developed (Fig. 12.4). For labeling candidate SSCs, a transgenic mouse line expressing a tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase (CreERT2) under the control of the regulatory sequence of a gene of interest is crossed with another transgenic mouse line with a floxed-stop GFP or lacZ reporter gene under the control of a ubiquitous promoter [52]. Tamoxifen administration transiently induces the translocation of CreERT2 to the nucleus, followed by the removal of the floxed-stop sequence [53]. Consequently, the Cre recombinase-expressing cells, presumably the cell population expressing the gene of interest, are irreversibly labeled with the introduced reporter gene. The progenies of the cell population are permanently labeled with the reporter gene under the control of the ubiquitous promoter. At various time points after tamoxifen administration, the testes from mice administered with tamoxifen are analyzed to identify the reporter+ spermatogenic colonies. If the labeled cells are SSCs, they replenish the existing differentiated germ cells by forming newly generated spermatogonia; thus, patches of spermatogenic colonies expressing the reporter gene are formed. If the labeled cells are non-SSCs, such as transit-amplifying cells, the reporter gene-expressing spermatogenic colonies are transient and will eventually disappear. Additionally, when a second reporter gene is connected to CreERT2 by a small 2A peptide sequence or an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequence to allow the co-expression of the two genes, identification of Cre recombinase-expressing cells is possible by detecting the second reporter gene+ cells (RFP in Fig. 12.4), and their topographical distribution in seminiferous tubules can be investigated.
This CreERT2-mediated cell lineage-tracing system demonstrated that Gfra1-, Id4-, Sox2-, Zbtb16-, Bmi1-, Pax7-, Nanos2-, and Axin2-expressing cells could give rise to reporter gene-labeled long-term spermatogenesis under homeostatic conditions in adult testes, indicating that the cells expressing these molecules are SSCs in undisturbed testes [14, 15, 32, 38, 54,55,56,57,58]. In addition, Id4-, Bmi1-, and Pax7-expressing cells have been shown to be able to regenerate long-term spermatogenesis under regenerative conditions after irradiation or chemotherapy [55,56,57]. Transgenic mouse studies or whole-mount immunocytochemistry confirmed that these genes were expressed in As spermatogonia. As mentioned earlier, while it was shown that most of the GFP+ cells in the testes of Id4-BAC clone transgenic mice were As [34], the GFP+ spermatogonia in the Id4-GFP knock-in mice were not limited to As; instead, GFP was broadly expressed in undifferentiated spermatogonia, including Apr and Aal [38]. In the third type of Id4 transgenic mice, that is, Id4-2A-CreERT2-2A-RFP knock-in mice, the major population of RFP+ cells comprised As spermatogonia, but the age of the mice analyzed was not described, and again, flow cytometric analysis was carried out only in juvenile testes (8 dpp) [55]. Nonetheless, the study clearly demonstrated that Id4+ undifferentiated spermatogonia are SSCs in normal and regenerative conditions.
The drawback of the Cre-mediated cell-labeling system is that the quantification of the colony-forming cells is difficult. The efficiency of the tamoxifen-induced removal of the floxed-stop sequence is not 100%. The threshold of intracellular tamoxifen concentration to complete the genetic recombination might be affected by the cell types or cell conditions. In addition, the efficiency of successful recombination will be affected by several factors including the promoter activity of the gene of interest, turnover and stability of Cre recombinase, and gene repair machinery available in the target cells. If the target gene is weakly expressed due to the high stability of the gene product, the target cells might not be efficiently labeled with the Cre recombinase.
Heterogeneity of Spermatogonial Stem Cells
Currently, SSCs are identified by the transplantation assay or cell lineage-tracing experiments . These two methods have revealed that SSCs exhibit heterogeneous phenotypes and that no universal feature covering all SSCs was observed. At the least, almost all SSC activity was detected in undifferentiated spermatogonia, comprising phenotypically and biologically heterogeneous cells. As originally described, undifferentiated spermatogonia display single (isolated), paired, and aligned morphological features. Furthermore, while the expression of ZBTB16 and CDH1 is relatively constant in the As, Apr, and Aal spermatogonia, and has been used to identify all undifferentiated spermatogonia, the As, Apr, and Aal spermatogonia display a trend of differential gene expression patterns [14]. GFRA1, Id4, Bmi1, Pax7, Nanos2, Lhx1, Bcl6b, Etv5, T, Sall4, Sox2, Eomes, and Pdx1 are shown to be preferentially expressed in As, whereas Pou5f1, Ngn3, Lin28A, Sohlh1, Sox3, and Rarg are preferentially expressed in long Aal in adult testes [14, 15, 32, 38, 54,55,56,57]. It should be noted that the use of different transgenic mouse lines or detection methods including flow cytometry, whole-mount immunocytochemistry, and immunohistochemistry, occasionally resulted in a different conclusion (for the Id4-GFP mouse, Id4-RFP mouse, Sox2-GFP mouse, etc.). In general, undifferentiated spermatogonia expressing As-oriented genes present high SSC activity in either the transplantation assay or cell lineage-tracing experiments; however, the SSC activity is not limited to the cells expressing As-oriented genes. The As-oriented gene− or Aal-oriented gene+ undifferentiated spermatogonia from adult testes presented a low level of SSC activity, indicating that SSCs with different gene expression profiles exist. Undoubtedly, the undifferentiated spermatogonia with high SSC activity in developing testes, normal adult testes, and regenerative adult testes appeared to be different. Undifferentiated spermatogonia expressing Pou5f1 or Ngn3 , both of which are Aal-oriented genes in adult testes, exhibit high SSC activity in the transplantation assay using juvenile testis cells or cell lineage-tracing experiments under a regenerative condition, respectively [14, 15, 31, 38, 47]. The possible key factor for generating heterogeneous SSCs is the surrounding microenvironment or the SSC niche. In developing testes, the SSC niche produces abundant growth factors for self-renewing proliferation and less inhibitory factors, which are supposed to be produced from differentiated germ cells, for self-renewal [59]. On the other hand, the SSC niche in homeostatic adult testes produces a moderate amount of mitogenic factors to maintain a stable SSC number. Accordingly, the majority of the SSCs in developing testes are in a mitotic state, while the SSCs in homeostatic conditions are likely to be quiescent or in a slow cycling state. In regenerating testes, the SSC niche again stimulates growth factor production for SSC expansion.
The dynamic exchange of undifferentiated spermatogonia can occur in regenerative conditions. In the normal adult testes, under homeostatic conditions, undifferentiated spermatogonia expressing As-oriented genes (e.g., Ngn3− Gfra1+ cells) self-renew and maintain spermatogenesis; however, under regenerative conditions, spermatogonia expressing Aal-oriented genes (e.g., Ngn3+ Gfra1− cells) re-express the As-oriented genes and acquire SSC activity [14, 38]. In addition, the transplantation assay, which mimics a regenerative condition, detected SSC activity in Ngn3+ Gfra1− cells. Ngn3+ Miwi2 (Piwil4)+ Gfra1− Kit− spermatogonia, which are mostly Apr and Aal and possess characteristics of transit-amplifying cells, are not responsible for homeostatic spermatogenesis. However, this cell population is crucial for regeneration after injury in the adult testes. The transplantation assay demonstrated that the Ngn3+ Miwi2+ Gfra1− cells indeed have a robust reconstitution activity [60].
Collectively, several lines of evidence indicate that SSC activity is not limited to As; the Apr and Aal retain or regain SSC activity. Furthermore, live cell imaging experiments have indicated that the differentiation process from As to Aal spermatogonia is not unidirectional, because As or Apr spermatogonia could be occasionally generated from Aal by fragmentation [15]. Another intriguing research has reported that KIT+ A1 spermatogonia became transplantable SSCs after culturing in vitro, indicating a possible dedifferentiation from the differentiating spermatogonia to SSCs [61]. These studies should be confirmed using different experimental settings, and the molecular mechanisms underlying these findings should be elucidated.
Concluding Remarks and Future Directions
In the past two decades, several SSC marker genes or As-oriented genes expressed in SSCs have been identified by the transplantation assay and cell lineage-tracing experiments (Table 12.1). Unfortunately, the functional roles of the majority of these genes, including Id4, Bmi1, Pax7, Sox2, Eomes, and Pdx1, in SSCs, have not been determined. However, Gfra1, which is the receptor of GDNF, is an exception. GDNF is an essential growth factor for SSC self-renewal, and directly drives the self-renewal of SSCs, followed by binding to GFRA1 [62, 63]. Bcl6b, Lhx1, Etv5, T, and Nanos2 have been suggested to be involved in GDNF-signaling in cultured SSCs [64,65,66]. The list of genes expressed in undifferentiated spermatogonia is increasing, but the functional interaction between these genes and their identified gene products is poorly understood. Recent studies using single-cell transcriptomic analysis of fresh testicular cells and undifferentiated spermatogonia enriched for SSCs have revealed that the expression patterns of all As-oriented genes are not correlated with each other [38, 67,68,69,70]. Presumably, the gene expression patterns in SSCs are more dynamic and unstable than previously thought. Future studies should address and elucidate the biological significance of the complex omics data, including not only the transcriptome but also methylome, proteome, and metabolome data obtained from undifferentiated spermatogonia. Furthermore, the deterministic roles of different SSC niches in developing, homeostatic, and regenerating testes in SSC heterogeneity should be clarified. Elucidating the functional roles and interactions of characteristic gene products and finding their causal regulators from the SSC niches will provide new insights into SSC biology and clarify the universal identity of SSCs, that is, characters that could be conserved among various mammalian species including humans, amidst their heterogeneity.
References
Amann RP (1981) A critical review of methods for evaluation of spermatogenesis from seminal characteristics. J Androl 2:37–58
Russell LD, Ettlin RA, Sinha Hikim AP, Clegg ED (1990) Histological and histopathological evaluation of the testis. Cache River Press, Clearwater
Fijak M, Meinhardt A (2006) The testis in immune privilege. Immunol Rev 213:66–81
Meistrich ML, van Beek MEAB (1993) Spermatogonial stem cells. In: Desjardins C, Ewing LL (eds) Cell and molecular biology of the testis. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 266–295
Kubota H, Brinster RL (2006) Technology insight: in vitro culture of spermatogonial stem cells and their potential therapeutic uses. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2:99–108
Kubota H, Brinster RL (2017) Transplantation and culture of spermatogonial stem cells. In: Oatley J, Griswold M (eds) The biology of mammalian spermatogonia. Springer New York, New York, pp 271–300
Fayomi AP, Orwig KE (2018) Spermatogonial stem cells and spermatogenesis in mice, monkeys and men. Stem Cell Res 29:207–214
Kubota H, Brinster RL (2018) Spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod 99:52–74
de Rooij DG, Russell LD (2000) All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J Androl 21:776–798
Greenbaum MP, Iwamori T, Buchold GM, Matzuk MM (2011) Germ cell intercellular bridges. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a005850
Russell LD, Chiarini-Garcia H, Korsmeyer SJ, Knudson CM (2002) Bax-dependent spermatogonia apoptosis is required for testicular development and spermatogenesis1. Biol Reprod 66:950–958
Huckins C (1971) The spermatogonial stem cell population in adult rats. I. Their morphology, proliferation and maturation. Anat Rec 169:533–557
Oakberg EF (1971) Spermatogonial stem-cell renewal in the mouse. Anat Rec 169:515–531
Nakagawa T, Sharma M, Nabeshima Y, Braun RE, Yoshida S (2010) Functional hierarchy and reversibility within the murine spermatogenic stem cell compartment. Science 328:62–67
Hara K, Nakagawa T, Enomoto H, Suzuki M, Yamamoto M, Simons BD, Yoshida S (2014) Mouse spermatogenic stem cells continually interconvert between equipotent singly isolated and syncytial states. Cell Stem Cell 14:658–672
Lagasse E, Shizuru JA, Uchida N, Tsukamoto A, Weissman IL (2001) Toward regenerative medicine. Immunity 14:425–436
Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW (1994) Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:11298–11302
Brinster RL, Avarbock MR (1994) Germline transmission of donor haplotype following spermatogonial transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:11303–11307
Zhang X, Ebata KT, Nagano MC (2003) Genetic analysis of the clonal origin of regenerating mouse spermatogenesis following transplantation. Biol Reprod 69:1872–1878
Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Inoue K, Miki H, Ogonuki N, Takehashi M, Morimoto T, Ogura A, Shinohara T (2006) Clonal origin of germ cell colonies after spermatogonial transplantation in mice. Biol Reprod 75:68–74
Till JE, McCulloch EA (1961) A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat Res 14:213–222
Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (1999) beta1- and alpha6-integrin are surface markers on mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:5504–5509
Tokuda M, Kadokawa Y, Kurahashi H, Marunouchi T (2007) CDH1 is a specific marker for undifferentiated spermatogonia in mouse testes. Biol Reprod 76:130–141
Shinohara T, Orwig KE, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (2000) Spermatogonial stem cell enrichment by multiparameter selection of mouse testis cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:8346–8351
Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (2003) Spermatogonial stem cells share some, but not all, phenotypic and functional characteristics with other stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:6487–6492
Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Toyokuni S, Shinohara T (2004) CD9 is a surface marker on mouse and rat male germline stem cells. Biol Reprod 70:70–75
Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Morimoto H, Shinohara T (2012) Enrichment of mouse spermatogonial stem cells by melanoma cell adhesion molecule expression. Biol Reprod 87:139
Buageaw A, Sukhwani M, Ben-Yehudah A, Ehmcke J, Rawe VY, Pholpramool C, Orwig KE, Schlatt S (2005) GDNF family receptor alpha1 phenotype of spermatogonial stem cells in immature mouse testes1. Biol Reprod 73:1011–1016
Yoshinaga K, Nishikawa S, Ogawa M, Hayashi S, Kunisada T, Fujimoto T (1991) Role of c-kit in mouse spermatogenesis: identification of spermatogonia as a specific site of c-kit expression and function. Development 113:689–699
Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (2004) Culture conditions and single growth factors affect fate determination of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod 71:722–731
Ohbo K, Yoshida S, Ohmura M, Ohneda O, Ogawa T, Tsuchiya H, Kuwana T, Kehler J, Abe K, Scholer HR, Suda T (2003) Identification and characterization of stem cells in prepubertal spermatogenesis in mice. Dev Biol 258:209–225
Arnold K, Sarkar A, Yram Mary A, Polo Jose M, Bronson R, Sengupta S, Seandel M, Geijsen N, Hochedlinger K (2011) sox2+ adult stem and progenitor cells are important for tissue regeneration and survival of mice. Cell Stem Cell 9:317–329
Pech MF, Garbuzov A, Hasegawa K, Sukhwani M, Zhang RJ, Benayoun BA, Brockman SA, Lin S, Brunet A, Orwig KE, Artandi SE (2015) High telomerase is a hallmark of undifferentiated spermatogonia and is required for maintenance of male germline stem cells. Genes Dev 29:2420–2434
Chan F, Oatley MJ, Kaucher AV, Yang QE, Bieberich CJ, Shashikant CS, Oatley JM (2014) Functional and molecular features of the Id4+ germline stem cell population in mouse testes. Genes Dev 28:1351–1362
Oatley MJ, Kaucher AV, Racicot KE, Oatley JM (2011) Inhibitor of DNA binding 4 is expressed selectively by single spermatogonia in the male germline and regulates the self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells in mice. Biol Reprod 85:347–356
Costoya JA, Hobbs RM, Barna M, Cattoretti G, Manova K, Sukhwani M, Orwig KE, Wolgemuth DJ, Pandolfi PP (2004) Essential role of Plzf in maintenance of spermatogonial stem cells. Nat Genet 36:653–659
Buaas FW, Kirsh AL, Sharma M, McLean DJ, Morris JL, Griswold MD, de Rooij DG, Braun RE (2004) Plzf is required in adult male germ cells for stem cell self-renewal. Nat Genet 36:647–652
La HM, Mäkelä J-A, Chan A-L, Rossello FJ, Nefzger CM, Legrand JMD, De Seram M, Polo JM, Hobbs RM (2018) Identification of dynamic undifferentiated cell states within the male germline. Nat Commun 9:2819
Best SA, Hutt KJ, Fu NY, Vaillant F, Liew SH, Hartley L, Scott CL, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE (2014) Dual roles for Id4 in the regulation of estrogen signaling in the mammary gland and ovary. Development 141:3159–3164
Helsel AR, Yang QE, Oatley MJ, Lord T, Sablitzky F, Oatley JM (2017) ID4 levels dictate the stem cell state in mouse spermatogonia. Development 144:624–634
Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Inoue K, Lee J, Yoshimoto M, Ogonuki N, Miki H, Baba S, Kato T, Kazuki Y, Toyokuni S, Toyoshima M, Niwa O et al (2004) Generation of pluripotent stem cells from neonatal mouse testis. Cell 119:1001–1012
Guan K, Nayernia K, Maier LS, Wagner S, Dressel R, Lee JH, Nolte J, Wolf F, Li M, Engel W, Hasenfuss G (2006) Pluripotency of spermatogonial stem cells from adult mouse testis. Nature 440:1199–1203
Seandel M, James D, Shmelkov SV, Falciatori I, Kim J, Chavala S, Scherr DS, Zhang F, Torres R, Gale NW, Yancopoulos GD, Murphy A et al (2007) Generation of functional multipotent adult stem cells from GPR125+ germline progenitors. Nature 449:346–350
Ko K, Tapia N, Wu G, Kim JB, Bravo MJ, Sasse P, Glaser T, Ruau D, Han DW, Greber B, Hausdorfer K, Sebastiano V et al (2009) Induction of pluripotency in adult unipotent germline stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 5:87–96
Szabó PE, Hübner K, Schöler H, Mann JR (2002) Allele-specific expression of imprinted genes in mouse migratory primordial germ cells. Mech Dev 115:157–160
Yeom YI, Fuhrmann G, Ovitt CE, Brehm A, Ohbo K, Gross M, Hubner K, Scholer HR (1996) Germline regulatory element of Oct-4 specific for the totipotent cycle of embryonal cells. Development 122:881–894
Ohmura M, Yoshida S, Ide Y, Nagamatsu G, Suda T, Ohbo K (2004) Spatial analysis of germ stem cell development in Oct-4/EGFP transgenic mice. Arch Histol Cytol 67:285–296
Hao L-Y, Armanios M, Strong MA, Karim B, Feldser DM, Huso D, Greider CW (2005) Short telomeres, even in the presence of telomerase, limit tissue renewal capacity. Cell 123:1121–1131
Garbuzov A, Pech MF, Hasegawa K, Sukhwani M, Zhang RJ, Orwig KE, Artandi SE (2018) Purification of GFRα1+ and GFRα1– spermatogonial stem cells reveals a niche-dependent mechanism for fate determination. Stem Cell Reports 10:553–567
Tegelenbosch RA, de Rooij DG (1993) A quantitative study of spermatogonial multiplication and stem cell renewal in the C3H/101 F1 hybrid mouse. Mutat Res 290:193–200
Nagano MC (2003) Homing efficiency and proliferation kinetics of male germ line stem cells following transplantation in mice. Biol Reprod 69:701–707
Kretzschmar K, Watt FM (2012) Lineage tracing. Cell 148:33–45
Feil R, Wagner J, Metzger D, Chambon P (1997) Regulation of cre recombinase activity by mutated estrogen receptor ligand-binding domains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 237:752–757
Sada A, Suzuki A, Suzuki H, Saga Y (2009) The RNA-binding protein NANOS2 is required to maintain murine spermatogonial stem cells. Science 325:1394–1398
Sun F, Xu Q, Zhao D, Degui CC (2015) Id4 marks spermatogonial stem cells in the mouse testis. Sci Rep 5:17594
Komai Y, Tanaka T, Tokuyama Y, Yanai H, Ohe S, Omachi T, Atsumi N, Yoshida N, Kumano K, Hisha H, Matsuda T, Ueno H (2014) Bmi1 expression in long-term germ stem cells. Sci Rep 4:6175
Aloisio GM, Nakada Y, Saatcioglu HD, Peña CG, Baker MD, Tarnawa ED, Mukherjee J, Manjunath H, Bugde A, Sengupta AL, Amatruda JF, Cuevas I et al (2014) PAX7 expression defines germline stem cells in the adult testis. J Clin Invest 124:3929–3944
Takase HM, Nusse R (2016) Paracrine Wnt/β-catenin signaling mediates proliferation of undifferentiated spermatogonia in the adult mouse testis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113:E1489–E1497
de Rooij DG, Lok D, Weenk D (1985) Feedback regulation of the proliferation of the undifferentiated spermatogonia in the Chinese hamster by the differentiating spermatogonia. Cell Tissue Kinet 18:71–81
Carrieri C, Comazzetto S, Grover A, Morgan M, Buness A, Nerlov C, O’Carroll D (2017) A transit-amplifying population underpins the efficient regenerative capacity of the testis. J Exp Med 214:1631–1641
Barroca V, Lassalle B, Coureuil M, Louis JP, Le Page F, Testart J, Allemand I, Riou L, Fouchet P (2009) Mouse differentiating spermatogonia can generate germinal stem cells in vivo. Nat Cell Biol 11:190–196
Meng X, Lindahl M, Hyvonen ME, Parvinen M, de Rooij DG, Hess MW, Raatikainen-Ahokas A, Sainio K, Rauvala H, Lakso M, Pichel JG, Westphal H et al (2000) Regulation of cell fate decision of undifferentiated spermatogonia by GDNF. Science 287:1489–1493
Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (2004) Growth factors essential for self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:16489–16494
Oatley JM, Avarbock MR, Telaranta AI, Fearon DT, Brinster RL (2006) Identifying genes important for spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:9524–9529
Wu X, Goodyear SM, Tobias JW, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL (2011) Spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal requires ETV5-mediated downstream activation of Brachyury in mice. Biol Reprod 85:1114–1123
Sada A, Hasegawa K, Pin PH, Saga Y (2012) NANOS2 acts downstream of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor signaling to suppress differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells. Stem Cells 30:280–291
Hermann BP, Mutoji KN, Velte EK, Ko D, Oatley JM, Geyer CB, McCarrey JR (2015) Transcriptional and translational heterogeneity among neonatal mouse spermatogonia. Biol Reprod 92:54
Wang M, Liu X, Chang G, Chen Y, An G, Yan L, Gao S, Xu Y, Cui Y, Dong J, Chen Y, Fan X et al (2018) Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis reveals sequential cell fate transition during human spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell 23:599–614.e594
Hermann BP, Cheng K, Singh A, Roa-De La Cruz L, Mutoji KN, Chen IC, Gildersleeve H, Lehle JD, Mayo M, Westernströer B, Law NC, Oatley MJ et al (2018) The mammalian spermatogenesis single-cell transcriptome, from spermatogonial stem cells to spermatids. Cell Rep 25:1650–1667.e1658
Green CD, Ma Q, Manske GL, Shami AN, Zheng X, Marini S, Moritz L, Sultan C, Gurczynski SJ, Moore BB, Tallquist MD, Li JZ et al (2018) A comprehensive roadmap of murine spermatogenesis defined by single-cell RNA-seq. Dev Cell 46:651–667.e610
Acknowledgements
The author thanks Dr. K. Kakiuchi for having continual discussions that have helped improve this manuscript. This work was partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 23380168) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kubota, H. (2019). Heterogeneity of Spermatogonial Stem Cells. In: Birbrair, A. (eds) Stem Cells Heterogeneity in Different Organs. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 1169. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24108-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24108-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-24107-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-24108-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)