Abstract
Microbial enzymes have gained interest for their widespread use in industries and medicine due to their stability, catalytic activity, and low-cost production, compared to plant and animal analogues. Microbial enzymes are capable of degrading toxic chemical compounds of industrial and domestic wastes by degradation or via conversion to nontoxic products. Enzyme technology broadly involves production, isolation, purification, and use of enzymes in various industries (e.g., food, medicine, agriculture, chemicals, pharmacology). The development of simple technologies for obtaining highly purified novel enzymes is an actual task for biotechnology and enzymology. This chapter presents a review of the main achievements in the elaboration of modern techniques for obtaining recombinant and novel enzymes. The results of a series of the authors’ investigations into the development of novel enzymatic approaches, including biosensors, for determination of practically important analytes are summarized. The described methods are related to isolation of highly purified yeast oxido-reductases: alcohol oxidase, flavocytochrome b2, glycerol dehydrogenase, and formaldehyde dehydrogenase. The enzymes were isolated from selected or recombinant yeast cells using the simple and effective technologies developed by the authors.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
5.1 Introduction
Enzymes are used in many different spheres of human activity, and this use is increasing rapidly due to reduced processing time, low energy input, cost effectiveness, nontoxic, and eco-friendly characteristics (Singh et al. 2016). Enzymatic reactions are the basis of many production processes, and application of microbial enzymes has been widely used since the early twentieth century. Enzymes are necessary in genetic engineering and biotechnology, and in particular for developing the ethanol fuel technology, in various industries (e.g., food, agriculture, chemicals, pharmaceuticals), and in medicine. Enzymes also play an important role in analytical applications (Reyes-De-Corcuera and Powers 2017; Chapman et al. 2018). Analytical systems which contain microbial enzymes possess high selectivity and sensitivity and are widely used in analytical laboratories of the food and microbiological industries, as well as for clinical diagnostics.
The driving force for the growth of the enzymatic test-systems and biosensors market is the need for security control of the environment and food, as well as health status due to the aging population and its related disorders, growth of chronic and infectious diseases, and environmental disasters. Furthermore, people care about their health and want to live comfortably and have fresh air, clean water, and high-quality food. These factors resulted in the development of various services for environmental monitoring of toxic compounds, as well as the emergence of new areas of medicine, including personalized medicine that requires high-performance noninvasive portable test-systems for application in the clinic and at home.
Production of recombinant proteins is a rapidly growing area of research and development. This area emerged in the early 1980s with the development of genetic engineering tools, which represented a compelling alternative to protein extraction from natural sources. Over the years, a high level of heterologous protein was made possible in a variety of cell factories (hosts) ranging from the bacteria Escherichia coli to mammalian cells (Vieira Gomes et al. 2018; Owczarek et al. 2019). It is worth mentioning that the production of recombinant biopharmaceutical proteins is a multibillion-dollar industry. The global market for industrial enzymes was valued at USD 4.61 billion in 2016 and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 5.8% from 2017 and reach USD 6.30 billion by 2022 (Singh et al. 2016; Pharmaion 2019; Feed enzymes market 2019; Industrial Enzymes Market 2019). This branch of science and industry requires rationally chosen cell factories (hosts) and cost-efficient protein isolation protocols.
Of the established hosts, yeasts combine the advantages of unicellular organisms such as fast biomass growth and relatively easy genetic manipulations, with eukaryotic features such as correct post-translational modifications of recombinant proteins and efficient secretory pathways (Rueda et al. 2016; Sibirny 2017; Baghban et al. 2018; Huang et al. 2018a, b; Ekas et al. 2019). This is the reason why yeasts have, in recent decades, become attractive hosts for the production of heterologous proteins, enzymes, organic compounds, biopharmaceuticals, etc. (Daly and Hearn 2005; Idiris et al. 2010; Mattanovich et al. 2014; Singh et al. 2016; Stasyk 2017; Vogl et al. 2018; Yang and Zhang 2018a, b; Ekas et al. 2019; Owczarek et al. 2019).
Analysis of the literature data and our own research experience indicates that the following general approaches are employed for obtaining highly purified yeast enzymes:
-
1.
Screening or gene engineering of the effective yeast strain as a producer of the target enzyme(s)
-
2.
Optimization of cell cultivation conditions for achieving the highest specific activity of a target enzyme in the cells
-
3.
Optimization of disruption conditions for producing intracellular enzymes
-
4.
Development of effective methods for enzyme isolation and purification
-
5.
Selection of methods for enzyme concentration and stabilization during storage
In the current chapter, we focused on the main achievements in the elaboration of modern techniques for isolation and purification of recombinant enzymes. Our investigations into effective technologies for obtaining yeast oxido-reductases of analytical importance are related to two aspects. One is the development of a cost-effective scheme for obtaining several enzymes from the same yeast source. The other is to summarize our previous results on isolation and purifications methods as well as the analytical application of some oxido-reductases for use in bioanalyses.
5.2 Non-conventional Yeasts as Hosts for Production of Heterological Proteins/Enzymes
Yeasts combine the ease of genetic manipulation and fermentation of cells with the capability of secreting and modifying foreign proteins according to a general scheme. Their rapid growth, microbiological safety, and high-density fermentation in simplified medium have a high impact, particularly in the large-scale industrial production of recombinant proteins (Singh et al. 2016; Sibirny 2017; Ekas et al. 2019).
Historically, Saccharomyces cerevisiae was the dominant yeast host for heterologous protein production (Muller et al. 1998; Kim et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2018). Lately, other yeasts, including non-conventional ones have emerged as advantageous cell factories. Non-conventional yeasts are considered as convenient expression platforms and promising industrial producers of recombinant proteins of academic and industrial interest (Reiser et al. 1990; Sudbery 1996; Stasyk 2017; Rebello et al. 2018). The yeasts Kluyveromyces lactis, K. marxianus, Scheffersomyces stipitis, Yarrowia lipolytica, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, as well as the methylotrophic yeasts Ogataea (Hansenula) polymorpha and Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris), have been developed as eukaryotic hosts because of their desirable phenotypes, including thermotolerance, assimilation of diverse carbon sources, and secretion of high quantities of proteins (Gellissen et al. 2005; Wagner and Alper 2016; Weninger et al. 2016; Juturu and Wu 2018; Vandermies and Fickers 2019).
Several value-added products – vaccines (Smith et al. 2012; Liu et al. 2014; Bredell et al. 2016; Xiao et al. 2018), mammalian proteins of pharmaceutical interest (Thömmes et al. 2001; Mack et al. 2009; Bawa et al. 2014; Arias et al. 2017; Walker and Pretorius 2018), therapeutic proteins (Griesemer et al. 2014; Kim et al. 2015; Love et al. 2018; Pobre et al. 2018; Zepeda et al. 2018a, b; Baghban et al. 2018; Owczarek et al. 2019), enzymes (Curvers et al. 2001; Hemmerich et al. 2014; Engleder et al. 2018; Vogl et al. 2018; Liu and Zhu 2018; Juturu and Wu 2018), industrial proteins (Singh et al. 2016; Shang et al. 2017; Barrero et al. 2018; Baghban et al. 2018), food additives, bio-renewable value-added chemicals, and biofuels (Jullessen et al. 2015; Kim et al. 2016; Białkowska 2016; Dmytruk et al. 2017; Semkiv et al. 2017; Porro and Branduardy 2017; Avalos et al. 2017; Passoth 2017; Rahman et al. 2017; Xu 2018; Ekas et al. 2019) were generated by the abovementioned yeasts.
Yeast expression systems are economical and do not contain pyrogenic or viral inclusions. Unlike prokaryotic systems, the eukaryotic subcellular organization of yeasts enables them to carry out many of the post-translational folding, processing, and modification events required to produce “authentic” and bioactive mammalian proteins (Buckholz and Gleeson 1991, Domínguez et al. 1998; Talebkhan et al. 2016; Stasyk 2017). However, secretory expression of heterologous proteins in yeasts is often subject to several bottlenecks that limit yield.
Yeast engineering by genetic modification has been the most useful and effective method for overcoming the drawbacks in yeast secretion pathways (Muller et al. 1998; Daly and Hearn 2005; Pobre et al. 2018; Vogl et al. 2018; Thomas et al. 2018; Bao et al. 2018; Chang et al. 2018; Nora et al. 2019). Metabolic engineering and synthetic biology methods are promising for production of native and transgenic enzymes and proteins on an industrial scale (Krivoruchko et al. 2011; Fletcher et al. 2016; Fernandes et al. 2016; Yang and Zhang 2018a; Theron et al. 2018; Ekas et al. 2019). Methanol-free mutant strains were constructed as alternatives to the traditional system, as a result of synthetic biology tools for reprogramming the cellular behavior of methylotrophic yeasts. The creation of a methanol-free induction system for eliminating the potential risks of methanol and for achieving enhanced recombinant protein production efficiency has been reviewed (Shen et al. 2016).
The methylotrophic yeasts K. phaffii (Pichia pastoris) and O. polymorpha are the most effective sources of recombinant proteins (Sudbery 1996; Berg et al. 2013; Rajamanickam et al. 2017; Peña et al. 2018; Sibirny 2017). The methylotrophic yeast O. polymorpha has remarkable thermotolerance. This yeast is therefore successfully used as a cell factory for the production of thermostable enzymes and proteins (Gellissen et al. 2005; Krasovska et al. 2007). Many of the expression platforms, including circular plasmids with the P. pastoris-specific autonomously replicating sequence (PARS1), were developed in order to facilitate genetic manipulation for plasmid replication and distribution (Song et al. 2003; Sturmberger et al. 2016; Nakamura et al. 2018; Portela et al. 2018).
Yeasts with beneficial native phenotypes and genetically modified cells were therefore selected and used for the heterologous production of recombinant enzymes, proteins, and other products. A detailed and comprehensive description of methylotrophic yeasts as producers of recombinant proteins was published by Stasyk (2017).
5.3 Scheme for Obtaining Several Yeast Enzymes from the Same Source
We carried out a research in order to develop a cost-effective approach for simultaneous isolation and purification of several enzymes with practical importance from the same yeast source. A mutant strain of the thermotolerant methylotrophic yeast O. polymorpha C-105 (gcr1 catX), overproducer of yeast alcohol oxidase (AO), was selected as the producer of enzymes (Gonchar et al. 1990). This strain has impairment in glucose catabolite repression of AO synthesis, is catalase-defective, and is able to overproduce AO in glucose medium. Contrary to P. pinus, the yeast O. polymorpha C-105 can generate a single AO isoform, due to the presence of the AO-coding gene only in its genome (Cregg et al. 1985, 1989; Gunkel et al. 2004). However, cultivation of O. polymorpha C-105 cells in glucose medium prevents the formation of multiple forms of AO which can be generated in methanol-containing medium as a result of chemical modification of the AO protein by formaldehyde (FA).
Yeast cells were cultivated in mineral medium with 1% glucose and 0.2% yeast extract up to the middle of the exponential growth phase (Gonchar et al. 2002). The cells were washed, resuspended in 30 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.5 (PB); supplemented with protease inhibitors; and disrupted with glass beads in a planetary disintegrator. The pellet of disrupted cells was removed by centrifugation, and the supernatant (cell-free extract) was used for a two-step ammonium sulfate fractionation (at 40 and 60% saturation).
Pellet 60% (see scheme in Fig. 5.1) was dissolved in 30 mM PB and placed on a column with ion-exchange sorbent DEAE-Toyopearl 650 M (Shleev et al. 2006; Sigawi et al. 2011). The sorbent was washed step by step with 30–200 mM PB; the target enzyme was eluted with 0.25 M PB and collected by fractions. Each fraction was tested for AO activity and protein concentration. AO activity was determined at 30 °C by the rate of hydrogen peroxide formation in reaction with methanol as monitored by the peroxidative oxidation of o-dianisidine in the presence of horseradish peroxidase (Gonchar et al. 2001). Chromatographic fractions with the highest specific activity of AO were combined and analyzed electrophoretically in PAG under denaturation conditions.
The resultant AO preparations with a specific activity up to 20 U per mg protein were fourfold purer than in pellet 60% and sevenfold purer than in the cell-free extract. The yield of purified AO from 1 L of yeast culture was about 800 U, which is 30% of the initial activity in the cell-free extract. The purified enzyme was stable, but still not homogeneous in SDS-PAG. AO preparations were stored as a suspension in 70% saturated ammonium sulfate (with an activity of 200 U mL−1 suspension) at −10 °C, without any remarkable decrease in activity over a period of 2 years. Before use, the enzyme suspension was centrifuged, and the enzyme precipitate was dissolved in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.6.
We tested additionally the activity of flavocytochrome b2 (Gaida et al. 2003) during AO purification in order to obtain the highly purified AO preparations (up to 40 U per mg protein) that were homogeneous during electrophoresis in SDS-PAG (see Fig. 5.1). The proposed approach for optimizing the technology for obtaining the target enzyme with the highest purity is characterized by the following points:
-
1.
Simplification of express qualitative or semiquantitative enzyme activity assays for target enzyme identification in a mixture of different proteins
-
2.
Visualization of enzymatic activity in native PAG for testing the presence of target and waste enzymes in each stage of the purification procedure (from the initial cell-free extract to the final chromatographic fractions)
The examples of express qualitative or semiquantitative assays for AO and Fcb2 are presented in Fig. 5.2.
A cost-effective technology for obtaining several enzymes from the same yeast producer was thus proposed. This technology demonstrated (Fig. 5.1) the possibility of isolating and chromatographically purifying several yeast enzymes from O. polymorpha C-105 cells: alcohol oxidase (AO), flavocytochrome b2 (Fc b2), glycerol dehydrogenase (GDH), methyl aminooxidase (AMO), arginase, formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FdDH), formate dehydrogenase (FDH), and formaldehyde reductase (FR). The best yields were observed for AO and Fc b2. Activities of other enzymes (Fig. 5.1) were tested as described earlier: for GDH by Synenka et al. (2015), for AMO by Krasovska et al. (2006), for arginase by Stasyuk et al. (2013), and for FdDH, FDH, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), methyl formiate synthase (MFS) and FR by Demkiv et al. (2011).
The proposed scheme for enzymes, presented in Fig. 5.1, was also applied to other yeast producers (see Table 5.1).
5.4 Oxido-reductases of Analytical Importance
5.4.1 Alcohol Oxidase
Alcohol oxidases (alcohol: O2 oxidoreductase; EC 1.1.3.x) are flavoenzymes that catalyze the oxidation of alcohols to the corresponding carbonyl compounds with a concomitant release of hydrogen peroxide. Based on substrate specificity, alcohol oxidases may be categorized broadly into four different groups, namely, (a) short-chain alcohol oxidase, (b) long-chain alcohol oxidase, (c) aromatic alcohol oxidase, and (d) secondary alcohol oxidase (Ozimek et al. 2005; Leferink et al. 2008; Goswami et al. 2013; Romero and Gadda 2014; Pickl et al. 2015; van Berkel 2018; Sützl et al. 2018). The sources reported for these enzymes are mostly limited to bacteria, yeasts (Sahm and Wagner 1973; Sagiroglu and Altay 2006; Shleev et al. 2006; Koch et al. 2016; Vonck et al. 2016; Mangkorn et al. 2019), fungi (Janssen and Ruelius 1968; Bringer et al. 1979; Kondo et al. 2008, Isobe et al. 2009; Hernández-Ortega et al. 2012), plants (Panadare and Rathod 2018), insects (Sperry and Sen 2001), and mollusks (Grewal et al. 2000).
Alcohol oxidase (EC 1.1.3.13) also known as methanol oxidase (AO) is a key enzyme of methanol methаbolism in methylotrophic yeasts; it catalyzes the first step of methanol oxidation to formic acid (Mincey et al. 1980; Eggeling and Sahm 1980; Sibirny et al. 1988; Lusta et al. 2000; Gadda 2008; Wongnate and Chaiyen 2013; Dijkman et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2018). In addition to the physiological substrate methanol, AO can typically oxidize also short aliphatic primary alcohols consisting of up to four carbons.
AO is a flavoprotein with flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD) as a prosthetic group, non-covalently, but very tightly bound with apoenzyme. Native protein is an octamer of approximately 600 kDa composed of eight identical FAD-containing subunits (Bringer et al. 1979; Mincey et al. 1980; Boteva et al. 1999; Gunkel et al. 2004; Ozimek et al. 2005; Isobe et al. 2009; van der Klei et al. 1991). Only octameric enzyme has catalytic activity. The mechanism of oligomerization into catalytical active octamers, as well as the role of AO octameric structure in catalysis, is not yet elucidated.
Although AO was discovered 50 years ago, its tertiary structure (for Pichia pastoris or Komagataella phaffii) was elucidated only in 2016 using crystallography and cryoelectron microscopy (Koch et al. 2016; Vonck et al. 2016).
AO shows a high structural homology to other members of the GMC (“glucose-methanol-choline”) family of oxidoreductases, which share a conserved FAD binding domain but have different substrate specificities (Gvozdev et al. 2012; Dijkman et al. 2013; Romero and Gadda 2014; Pickl et al. 2015; Sützl et al. 2018; Liu et al. 2018). The preference of AO for small alcohols is explained by the presence of conserved bulky aromatic residues near the active site. Compared to the other GMC enzymes, AO contains a large number of amino acid inserts, the longest being 75 residues. These segments are found at the periphery of the monomer and make extensive inter-subunit contacts which are responsible for the very stable octamer. A short surface helix forms contacts between two octamers, explaining the tendency of AO to form crystals in the peroxisomes (Vonck et al. 2016).
The crystal structure analysis of the methanol oxidase from P. pastoris was described (Koch et al. 2016). The crystallographic phase problem was solved by means of molecular replacement in combination with initial structure rebuilding using Rosetta model completion and relaxation against an averaged electron density map. The subunit arrangement of the homo-octameric AO differs from that of octameric vanillyl alcohol oxidase and other dimeric or tetrameric AOs, due to the insertion of two large protruding loop regions and an additional C-terminal extension in AO. In comparison to other AOs, the active site cavity of AO is significantly reduced in size, which could explain the observed preference for methanol as substrate. All AO subunits of the structure reported here harbor a modified FAD, which contains an arabityl chain instead of a ribityl chain attached to the isoalloxazine ring.
The recently described AO from the white-rot basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium (PcAOX) was reported to feature very mild activity on glycerol. PcAOX was expressed in Escherichia coli in high yields and displayed high thermostability. Steady-state kinetics revealed that PcAOX is highly active toward methanol, ethanol, and propanol-1 (kcat = 18; 19 and 11 s−1, respectively), but showed a very limited activity toward glycerol (kobs = 0.2 s−1at 2 M substrate). The crystal structure of the homo-octameric PcAOX was determined at a resolution of 2.6 Å. The catalytic center is a remarkable solvent-inaccessible cavity located at the re-side of the flavin cofactor. Its small size explains the observed preference for methanol and ethanol as best substrates (Nguyen et al. 2018). The catalytic center is a remarkable solvent-inaccessible cavity located at the re-side of the flavin cofactor. Its small size explains the observed preference for methanol and ethanol as best substrates (Nguyen et al. 2018).
In our research, we have obtained a stable highly purified AO (up to a specific activity of 40 U mg−1) from the overproducing strain of the yeast O. polymorpha C-105 (gcr1 catX) with impaired glucose-induced catabolite repression of AO synthesis and completely devoid of catalase (see Sect. 5.3). Such purity permitted to obtain the enzyme in crystalline form. The crystals of highly purified AO were obtained by different methods, including crystallization in space weightless conditions. X-ray study followed by the calculations for AO complexes with competitive inhibitors structures was performed. Comparative analysis of X-ray database for AO structure with the known protein structures of some oxidases was done, and the model of AO subunit tertiary structure was proposed (Fig. 5.3). Some recommendations for site-specific mutagenesis in AO gene for obtaining enzyme with significantly decreased affinity to ethanol compared to the wild-type AO have been done (Gayda et al. unpublished data).
5.4.2 NAD+- and Glutathione-Dependent Formaldehyde Dehydrogenase
Formaldehyde (FA) is a natural metabolite found in tissues, cells, and body fluids. It is present in fruits, vegetables, meat, and fish. FA is also a large-scale product, used extensively in industry. FA is very toxic and is an extremely active chemical compound which causes modifications of bioorganic molecules in living organisms. That is why this dangerous compound is monitored in environmental, industrial, and medical laboratories. Enzymatic methods for valid selective determination of FA are based on using FA-selective enzymes, including formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FdDH). The aim of our research was to obtain highly purified FdDH and develop analytical approaches for FA assay. For this aim, yeast engineering for construction of FdDH-overproducing strains was carried out.
The O. рolymorpha FLD1 gene with its own promoter was inserted into the integrative plasmid pYT1 (Demkiv et al. 2005) containing the LEU2 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (as a selective marker) in order to construct strains of O. рolymorpha that overproduce thermostable NAD+- and glutathione-dependent FdDH. The constructed vector was used for multicopy integration of the target gene into the O. рolymorpha genome by transformation of leu 1-1 (Demkiv et al. 2005, 2011; Sibirny et al. 2011b) and leu 2-2 recipient cells (both leu alleles were complemented by S. cerevisiae gene LEU2).
Selection of FdDH-overproducing strains was carried out simultaneously by leucine prototrophy and by resistance to elevated FA concentrations in the medium. Of more than 150 integrative Leu+ transformants with higher resistance to FA (up to 10–12 mM on solid plates), 14 stable clones which were resistant to 15–20 mM FA on plates were selected and studied in greater detail. The growth characteristics of selected clones in the liquid medium are shown in Fig. 5.4. All transformants grew better and were more resistant to elevated FA content in liquid medium with 1% methanol, compared to the recipient strains. A detailed description of this research has been done by Demkiv et al. (2005, 2011). Finally, FdDH specific activities were tested in cell-free extracts (CE) of the best selected FA-resistant Leu-prototrophic transformants (Fig. 5.4).
Tf 11-6 and Тf 22-142 were the most effective recombinant strains with the highest FdDH activity (up to 4.0 U mg−1), which was four- to fivefold higher compared to the parental strains, leu 1-1 and leu 2-2, respectively. These transformants were characterized and chosen as sources for FdDH production.
Southern dot-blot analysis showed that genomes of the stable recombinant yeast clones contain 6–8 copies of the target FLD1 gene (Demkiv et al. 2011). The recombinant yeast strain Tf 11-6 contains more than eight copies of the integrated plasmid, as opposed to one copy in the parental strain, probably due to use of the double-gene-containing plasmid pHp(FLD1)2 and its tandem aggregation into the genome of the recipient strain.
The influence of growth medium composition on FdDH concentration was studied for the best two strains, Tf 11-6 and Tf 22-142, in order to optimize cultivation conditions for obtaining the highest enzyme yield. FdDH activity in cell-free extract was shown to be dependent on a carbon source. Cultivation in medium with 1% methanol resulted in significant levels of the enzyme synthesis for both tested strains (Fig. 5.4). This is in accordance with the literature data (Hartner and Glieder 2006; van der Klei et al. 1991; Eggeling and Sahm 1980).
We demonstrated that the addition of FA to the methanol medium stimulated synthesis of FdDH. The target enzyme activity was 6.2 U mg−1 under experimentally determined optimal conditions (with methanol as a carbon source, methylamine as a nitrogen source, and 5 mM FA as an additional inducer of FdDH synthesis). This is 1.6-fold higher than under normal growth conditions. The addition of 10 mM FA to the optimal culture medium resulted in a FdDH activity of 8.3 U mg−1, which is twofold higher than in the medium without FA. The strong correlation between FA concentration in the medium and FdDH activity in cultivated cells of recombinant yeast strain Tf-11-6 demonstrates the important role of FA as an inducer of FdDH synthesis (Fig. 5.4).
The enzyme was isolated from a cell-free extract of the recombinant overproducing Tf 11-6 strain. Cells were cultivated in 1% methanol medium supplemented with 5 mМ FA for 20 h (Demkiv et al. 2007). A simple scheme for FdDH isolation and purification from the recombinant strain by two-step column chromatography on an anion-exchange sorbent was proposed, resulting in a FdDH preparation with specific activity of 27 U mg−1 protein.
In the first step, cell-free extract (CE) was applied to the sorbent, equilibrated by PB (pH 8.0). The fraction of unabsorbed proteins, which contained FdDH, was diluted with water (1:3). Tris base solution was added to adjust the pH to 8.8, and the final solution was applied to the same column (the second step), previously washed with 1 M NaCl and equilibrated with 40 mM Tris buffer, pH 8.8 (TB). The enzyme was eluted with 0.1 M NaCl in the initial TB buffer, and the specific activity of FdDH was assayed in each fraction. The fractions of eluate with enzyme activity higher than 10 U mg−1 and devoid of AO activity were combined, and dithiothreitol (DTT) up to 2 mM and ammonium sulfate (up to 80% saturation, pH 8.0, at 0 °C) were added. After incubation at 0 °C for 1 h, the enzyme was collected by centrifugation, and the pellet was resuspended in a minimal volume of ammonium sulfate solution (80% saturation) in 40 mM TB with 2 mM DTT.
The specific activity of resulted FdDH was 27 U mg−1. For comparison, the specific activities of commercially available FdDH preparations from P. putida and from the yeast C. boidinii are 3–5 U mg−1 and 17–20 U mg−1, respectively. The purity of the isolated enzyme preparation was controlled by PAG electrophoresis under denaturation conditions according to Laemmly (Demkiv et al. 2007; Sibirny et al. 2011b).
It was reported that the predicted FLD1 gene product (Fld1p) is a protein of 380 amino acids (Baerends et al. 2002). Since the molecular mass of native FdDH from various methanol-utilizing yeasts was estimated to be between 80 and 85 kDa, the isolated thermostable NAD+- and GSH-dependent FdDH can be assumed to be dimeric. The molecular mass of the FdDH subunit, estimated by SDS-electrophoresis, was shown to be approximately 40 kDa, which is similar to the 41 kDa found for C. boidinii (Yurimoto 2009).
Optimal pH and pH stability of the enzyme were evaluated by incubation in the appropriate buffer at room temperature for 60 min. The optimal pH was found to be in the range of 7.5–8.5, and the highest stability of FdDH was observed at pH 7.0–8.5.
Values of the Michaelis-Menten constant (KM) for FA and NAD+ calculated for this enzyme are close to the KM for the wild-type enzyme. The effect of several inhibitors on the enzymatic properties was studied. The bivalent cations Zn2+, Cu2+, and Mn2+ were shown to inhibit FdDH activity, as did the ionic detergent SDS. According to the literature, enzymes from two other yeasts, P. pastoris and C. boidini (Allais et al. 1983; Kato 1990; Patel et al. 1983), were also inhibited in a similar manner.
A limited number of publications on the isolation and characterization of formaldehyde reductase (FdR) and the absence of a corresponding commercial preparation of the enzyme led us to screen potential microbial FdR producers among wild-type and recombinant strains of the yeast O. polymorpha. The gene-engineered integrative transformants with the highest FA resistance originating from leu 2-2 were shown to overproduce NADH-dependent FdR upon cultivation on 1% ethanol or glycerol. The best integrative clone, T22-126, was chosen as a source for FdR isolation, and optimal cultivation conditions for the highest yield of FR were established (Demkiv et al. 2011). The simple scheme for isolation of FR (Gayda et al. 2008b) from O. polymorpha T22-126 yeast cells and chromatographic purification of the enzyme on anion-exchange sorbent was proposed, resulting in electrophoretically homogeneous enzyme preparations.
The enzymatic methods and analytical kits for FA assay were developed based on FdDH (Demkiv et al. 2007; Gayda et al. 2008a, 2015; Sibirny et al. 2011a, b). In methylotrophic yeasts, FdDH catalyses the oxidation of FA to formic acid under simultaneous reduction of NAD+ to NADH. The proposed enzymatic method is based on the photometric detection of a colored product, formazan, which is formed from nitrotetrazolium blue in a reaction coupled with FdDH-catalyzed oxidation of FA in the presence of an artificial mediator, PMS (Demkiv et al. 2007).
Purified preparations of FdDH were also used for construction of FA-selective electrochemical biosensors. Several FA-selective FdDH-based biosensors with different types of signal detection were developed and described in detail (Nikitina et al. 2007; Ali et al. 2007; Demkiv et al. 2008; Gayda et al. 2008a; Sibirny et al. 2011a, b). All constructed biosensors were characterized by high storage and good operational stability, high sensitivity, broad dynamic range, and low applied potential compared to known biosensors. A comparative analysis of different FA-sensitive biosensors was presented in reviews (Sibirny et al. 2011a, b; Gayda et al. 2015).
5.4.3 NAD+-Dependent Glycerol Dehydrogenase
Analysis of glycerol (GlOH) is important in clinical diagnostics for assessing the level of triglycerides in obesity and metabolic disorders, in particular lipid metabolism, that cause the development of type II diabetes and cardiovascular disease and in the wine industry for controlling wine quality during the production process. Simple methods for monitoring GlOH content (as a by-product of this technology) are currently in high demand, due to the growth in biodiesel production (Gerpen 2005; Talebian-Kiakalaieh et al. 2018). Additionally, GlOH assay is necessary for new technologies of GlOH conversion to valuable chemical products, including dihydroxyacetone (DHA) (Li et al. 2010; Cho et al. 2015; Kumar and Park 2018; Oh et al. 2018).
A key component of enzymatic kits for glycerol assay are glycerol-selective enzymes, including glycerol dehydrogenase (GDH). GDH (EC 1.1.1.6) is synthesized by mammalian tissues and microorganisms, including bacteria and yeasts (Yamada et al. 1982; Gartner and Kopperschlager 1984; Ruzheinikov et al. 2001; Yamada-Onodera et al. 2002). Three types of enzymes have been described: NAD+-dependent GDH that converts GlOH to DHA and vice versa, NADP+-dependent GDH that catalyzes the conversion between GlOH and DHA (glycerol 2-dehydrogenase, EC 1.1.1.156), and NADP+-dependent GDH that catalyzes the conversion of GlOH on glyceraldehyde (EC 1.1.1.72). GDH is a promising enzyme for the development of analytical methods for assaying GlOH and other alcohols as well as for GlOH conversion. Commercial preparations of GDH from Cellulomonas speciaes, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Bacillus megaterium are present on the enzymes market (Sigma products).
The aim of our work was to obtain a thermotolerant NAD+-dependent GDH of O. polymorpha (previously H. polymorpha) and to investigate its properties in order to develop a reliable and sensitive glycerol assay. We used the recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain that harbors the gene HpGDH (Mallinder et al. 1992). This strain was created for the biotransformation of glycerol to DHA (Nguyen and Nevoigt 2009). It contains an extrachromosomal multicopy plasmid p424GDH with an integrated O. polymorpha GDH gene under a strong constitutive glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPH) promoter. During cultivation of the cells in a medium with glucose, GDH of O. polymorpha was constitutively expressed, and this enzyme oxidized glycerol to DHA. GDH overexpression resulted in DHA extrusion into the extracellular liquid up to 100 mg L−1, which is 60-fold higher than in the wild-type strain.
Optimal conditions for cell cultivation were studied (Fig. 5.5).
The influence of the growth medium composition on biomass and enzyme yield for the chosen producer was studied in order to obtain the highest GDH yield (Fig. 5.5A-E). GDH activity in cell-free extract was dependent on a carbon source. Cultivation in a medium containing 1% GlOH and 0.1% glucose resulted in considerable levels of enzyme activity (Fig. 5.5C). It is noteworthy that two GDH isoforms were visualized in native PAG when cells were cultivated in a medium with GlOH and glucose. However, only one thermostable form of GDH was found in cells cultivated in GlOH without glucose (Fig. 5.5I).
A simple scheme for O. polymorpha GDH isolation from a cell-free extract of the recombinant strain S. cerevisiae was developed. It includes desintegration of the cells by vigorous vortexing followed by two-stage ion-exchange chromatography of cell-free extract on DEAE-Toyopearl M-650 (at pH 8.0 and pH 8.8). This approach was proposed earlier for purification of recombinant FdDH (Demkiv et al. 2007). As a result, a highly purified (tenfold) enzyme preparation with specific activity of 34 U mg−1 of protein and 10 % yield was obtained (Fig. 5.5J). For comparison, specific activities of commercially available GDH preparations are 50 U mg−1 for enzyme from Cellulomonas sp., 15 U mg−1 of solid for B. megaterium, and 20–80 U mg−1 of protein – for E. aerogenes. The purity of the isolated enzyme preparation was controlled by PAG electrophoresis under denaturation conditions according to Laemmly. Molecular weight of enzyme’s subunit was shown to be 40 kDa (Fig. 5.5J).
The enzymatic method for GlOH assay based on GDH was developed (Gayda et al. 2013a, b). In yeasts, GDH catalyzes the oxidation of GlOH to DHA under simultaneous reduction of NAD+ to NADH. The proposed enzymatic method includes photometric detection of a colored product, formazan, which is formed from nitrotetrazolium blue in a reaction coupled with GDH-catalyzed oxidation of GlOH in the presence of an artificial mediator, PMS. The same approach was used for the development of an enzymatic method for FA assay (Demkiv et al. 2007). The optimal conditions for an effective reaction were determined. Calibration graphs for GlOH estimation, using a GDH-based method, are presented in Fig. 5.5. This method was used for analysis of GlOH in real samples of commercial wines (see Sect. 5.5.2).
5.4.4 Flavocytochrome b2
L-Lactate is an important metabolite in glucose metabolism. Monitoring lactate levels is a useful indicator of the balance between tissue oxygen demand and utilization and is useful when studying cellular and animal physiology. Lactate detection plays a significant role in healthcare, and food industries and is specially necessitated in conditions like hemorrhage, respiratory failure, hepatic disease, sepsis, and tissue hypoxia.
For L-lactate analysis a lot of physicochemical and chemical methods have been proposed: spectrophotometry, fluorimetry, pH potentiometric measurements, and amperometric biosensors based on O2 and H2O2 electrodes. The available methods include enzymatic approaches which generally use NAD+-dependent lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from animal muscle or heart and bacterial lactate oxidase. These classic approaches as well as modern methods were described in detail in the last years (Rassaei et al. 2014; Sharma et al. 2017; Rosati et al. 2018; Rathee et al. 2016; Dagar and Pundir 2018; Bollella et al. 2019). Most of these methods need a lot of time and previous labour-consuming procedures such as filtration, chromatography, deproteinization, etc. On the other hand, most of them require an expensive equipment or are non-selective.
We proposed using the yeast L-lactate-cytochrome c-oxidoreductase (EC 1.1.2.3; flavocytochrome b2, Fc b2) of the thermotolerant methylotrophic yeast O. polymorpha as a promising biocatalyst for enzymatic-chemical analytical methods and amperometric biosensors. Fc b2 is a tetramer of identical subunits, where each subunit contains FMN- and haem-binding domains. The enzyme exhibits absolute specificity for L-lactate, but application of Fc b2 from baker’s yeast in bioanalytics is hampered by its instability and difficulties in purification of the enzyme. We used the following stages for obtaining Fc b2:
-
1.
Screening potential yeast producers in order to choose the best source of thermostable Fc b2
-
2.
Optimizing cultivation conditions in order to achieve the maximal yield of the enzyme
-
3.
Testing different cell disruption methods in order to obtain a stable enzyme with the highest yield
-
4.
Developing a simple scheme for Fc b2 isolation, chromatographic purification, and stabilization
The highly purified target enzyme was used for developing enzymatic-chemical and biosensor methods for L-lactate assay. Screening of 16 yeast species was carried out in order to choose the most effective producer of the stable form of FC b2. For this aim, a method of visualization of the activity of Fc b2 in electrophoretograms was used. This method was based on the interaction between ferrocyanide (generated during the enzymatic reaction) and Fe3+, resulting in the formation of intensely colored precipitates of Berlin blue (Gaida et al. 2003) The main advantages of this method were its high sensitivity (less than 0.005 U Fc b2 was detected within a suitable time period) and the stability of the dye formed. The method developed can be used for determining Fcb2 activity in cell-free extracts (e.g., in the selection of Fc b2 producers) and monitoring chromatographic purification of proteins, as well as in other cases associated with Fc b2 assessment. O. polymorpha, Kluyveromyces lactis, and Rhodotorula pilimanae, which exhibited the highest specific activities in cell-free extracts, were chosen as the best producers of Fc b2 (Fig. 5.6). A study of the enzyme’s thermostability in the cell-free-extracts revealed that only Fc b2 from O. polymorpha remains active after heating for 10 min at 60 °C or 3 min at 70 °C (Smutok et al. 2006c).
To obtain the target enzyme, O. polymorpha cells were cultivated in flasks to the beginning of the stationary growth phase at 30 °C on a shaker with strong aeration (240 rpm) in a mineral medium containing 1% glucose, 0.2% L-lactate sodium, and 0.05% yeast extract. Freshly grown cells were collected by centrifugation, washed, lyophilized, and kept at –20 °C until used (Smutok et al. 2006a).
Cell-free extract (CE) was obtained by incubating lyophilized cells in a lysing mixture with 10% n-butanol (Gaida et a. 2003). CE was separated from the cell debris by centrifugation, cell fragments were washed twice with a lysing mixture, and the supernatants were combined (C1). It is worth mentioning that cell fragments in the C1 contained a significant amount of Fc b2. The pellets were therefore also extracted with 1% Triton X-100 in 50 mM PB, pH 7.5, and the supernatants were combined (C2).
It was demonstrated that the specific activity and stability of Fc b2 was higher in the C1 and C2 extracts than in the CE. Furthermore, use of Triton X-100 allows an extraction of up to 95% of the total Fc b2 activity from the cell debris (C1+C2). The enzyme was purified from the (C1+C2) extracts with a total activity of 60 U by column chromatography on the anion-exchange sorbent DEAE-Toyopearl 650 M (TSK-Gel, Japan). The enzyme was eluted by 15% (of saturation at 0 °C) ammonium sulfate in 50 mM PB, pH 7.5, containing L-lactate. Monitoring of enzyme activity and purity was carried out by estimation of the Fc b2 specific activity in each fraction and by PAG-electrophoresis under native (Gaida et al. 2003) and denaturation conditions according Lemmly.
The most active fractions were combined and treated with ammonium sulfate up to 70% saturation. The highest specific activity of FC b2 in some fractions was 20 U·mg−1 protein; the yield was 10%. Precipitation with ammonium sulfate allows to purify the target enzyme additionally (1.5-fold) up to 30 U mg−1 (Smutok et al. 2006a).
Fc b2 preparation isolated from the methylotrophic yeast O. polymorpha 356 has been chosen as a biorecognition element in biosensor’s construction (Smutok et al. 2005, 2006a, 2011, 2017; Goriushkina et al. 2009) as well as for the development of enzymatic-chemical methods for L-lactate assay (Gonchar et al. 2009; Smutok et al. 2013).
5.5 Bioanalytical Application of the Isolated Oxido-reductases
Enzymes AO, FdDH, GDH, and FC b2, isolated from the cells O. polymorpha C-105 and other yeast producers, including recombinant cells (see Table 5.1), were used as biocatalysts for the development of analytical approaches to determine correspondent analytes (Fig. 5.7).
5.5.1 AO, FdDH, and FC b2
The functional characteristics of the constructed amperometric biosensors for analysis of practically important analytes, based on the purified yeast oxido-reductases, are summaried in Table 5.2. The main advantage of the developed enzyme-based biosensors is a simple procedure of sample preparation: neither pretreatment of the samples nor their derivatization is required.
Highly stable and sensitive amperometric biosensors on primary alcohols and FA were developed using AO isolated from thermotolerant methylotrophic yeast O. polymorpha as biorecognition elements (Smutok et al. 2006b, Shkotova et al. 2006; Smutok et al. 2011; Sigawi et al. 2011, 2014). To construct bi-enzyme sensor, immobilization of AO was performed by means of electrodeposition paints; horseradish peroxidase (PO) and Os-complex modified polymer were used to decrease the working potential (Smutok et al. 2006b). Mono-enzyme AO-based biosensor was also developed by electrochemical deposition of the Resydrol polymer, conjugated with AO (Shkotova et al. 2006). To facilitate electron transfer between the enzyme and the electrode surface, electroactive polymers were used in biosensor’s construction. Both biosensors demonstarted a good reproducibility and operational and storage stability, so they were used for ethanol assay in real alcoholic beverages. For optimization of the electrochemical communication between the immobilized enzymes and the electrode surface, a variety of sensor architectures were tested. Bioanalytical properties of the most effective AO-/HRP-based biosensor were investigated (Table 5.2). The best biosensor with architecture HRP/Os-Ap59//AOX/CP9 was applied for the determination of ethanol in wine samples (Smutok et al. 2006b).
For construction of highly selective biosensors on FA, FdDH being highly selective to FA was used (see Table 5.2). The developed biosensors on FA show high sensitivity and selectivity to FA and good operational and storage stability. The reagentless biosensor on FA with fixation of all sensor components in a bioactive layer on the transducer surface was proposed (Demkiv et al. 2008). This biosensor was designed to prevent any leakage of the low-molecular and free-diffusing cofactors of FdDH, thus enabling FA determination without addition of the cofactors to the analyte solution. A validity of this biosensor for FA analysis in real samples was approved by testing formalin-containing commercial goods.
A number of amperometric L-lactate-selective biosensors were developed using Fcb2 and the enzyme-producing yeast cells (Table 5.2). Different immobilization methods and low-molecular free-diffusing redox mediators were tested for optimizing the electrochemical communication between the immobilized enzyme and the electrode surface. The possibility of direct electron transfer from the reduced form of Fc b2 to carbon electrodes was evaluated. The bioanalytical properties of Fc b2-based biosensors, such as signal rise time, dynamic range, dependence of the sensor output on the pH value, temperature, and storage stability, were investigated, and the proposed biosensor demonstrated a very fast response and a high selectivity for L-lactate determination (Smutok et al. 2005, 2006a; Goriushkina et al. 2009). The proposed biosensor was successfully tested for L-lactate analysis on the samples of commercial wines.
Combining nanobiotechnology with electrochemical enzyme-based biosensors has become a crucially novel strategy for the development of simple and reliable monitoring systems for food quality and safety. Nanomaterials also endow electrochemical biosensors with device miniaturization and high sensitivity and specificity. They, therefore, have a great potential for on-site food safety assessment (Nikolelis and Nikoleli 2016, Gonchar et al. 2017; Lv et al. 2018).
The improved biosensors were created using a combination of genetic technology and nanotechnology approaches, namely, by overexpression of the corresponding gene in the recombinant yeast cells and by the transfer of enzyme-bound gold nanoparticles (Fcb2-nAu and AO-nAu) into the cells (Smutok et al. 2005; Karkovska et al. 2017). The resulted biosensors were shown to possess the high sensitivity and the fast response. A novel mono-enzyme AO-based nanobiosensor on ethanol was constructed with the usage of peroxidase-like PtRu-nanoparticles. This biosensor, being rather stable and very sensitive, was successfully tested on the several real samples of wines (Stasyuk et al. 2019). Recently, we demonstrated the possibility of developing reagentless AO-based amperometric biosensors using nanoparticles of noble metals, synthesized via “green synthesis” in the presence of extracellular metabolites of the yeast O. polymorpha. It was shown that AO-based electrode, modified with green-synthesized Pd nanoparticles, although having a lower sensitivity to methanol, reveals a broader linear range of detection and a higher storage stability, compared with unmodified control electrode. Such bioelectrode characteristics are desirable for enzymes, possessing a very high sensitivity for their substrates, because in such cases the tested samples must be very diluted, which is problematic for online analysis of real samples (Gayda et al. 2019).
To achieve the excellent characteristics of enzyme-based sensor, the usage of gold electrode, modified by Fcb2-nAu claster, was proposed recently (Smutok et al. 2017). This biosensor was shown to demonstrate a ninefold higher sensitivity to L-lactate and a wider linear range in comparison with the characteristics for free enzyme, immobilized on the same electrode.
Enzymatic-chemical methods for ethanol (Gonchar et al. 2001; Pavlishko et al. 2005), FA (Demkiv et al. 2007; Gayda et al. 2008a; Sibirny et al. 2011a, b; Sigawi et al. 2011), and L-lactate (Gonchar et al. 2009; Smutok et al. 2013) determination were described also earlier. All these methods were successfully tested on the real samples of food products, beverages, as well as biological liquids (Smutok et al. 2011; Pavlishko et al. 2005; Sibirny et al. 2011a, b).
5.5.2 GDH-Based Methods for Glycerol Assay in Wines
The general principles of amperometric detection of glycerol (GlOH) using enzyme-based biosensors were previously reviewed in detail (Goriushkina et al. 2010; Smutok et al. 2011; Synenka et al. 2015; Mahadevan and Fernando 2016). The described methods are based on NADH and mediators-aid registration, on the use of oxygen and hydrogen peroxide electrodes, conductive organic salts, and wiring electrodes. GlOH assay using recombinant yeast GDH was not investigated as thoroughly. We therefore focus on demonstrating the applicability of the proposed enzymatic-chemical method to GlOH assay in real samples: wines.
GlOH is an important by-product of glycolysis and is quantitatively one of the major components of wine (Nieuwoudt et al. 2002). GlOH positively influences the taste of table wines, giving them viscosity, sweetness, and softness. The production of GlOH is closely linked to the availability of the fermentable sugars presented in musts.
We developed an enzymatic-chemical method for GlOH assay based on spectrophotometric detection of solubilized formazan (see Sect. 5.4.2) which is generated in the reaction of nitrotetrazolium blue with NADH, a product of GDH-catalyzed oxidation of GlOH. The validity of the proposed method was tested on commercial wines and compared with a referent method. A standard addition test was used in order to evaluate the negative influence of wine components on enzyme-catalyzed reactions. The results of graphical estimation of the GlOH content in the samples of some commercial wines are presented in Fig. 5.8. It was shown that the estimated values are in good correlation with the data of reference methods, as well as with literature data.
The GlOH content, usually formed by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in wine, varies between 1.36 and 11 g/L (15–120 mM) ( http://www.lallemandwine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Wine-Expert-120321-WE-Glycerol-and-WInemaking.pdf ). Higher GlOH levels are generally considered as improving wine quality. The mean GlOH concentrations in dry red (10.49 g L−1), dry white (6.82 g L−1), and noble late harvest wines (15.55 g L−1) were found to be associated with considerable variation within each respective style (Nieuwoudt et al. 2002). GlOH content is greater in wines from must that was processed with sulfite (Goold et al. 2017; Belda et al. 2017; Rankine and Bridson 1974; Remize et al. 2003) and also in wines made from grapes affected by Botrytis cinerea, the “noble mold” – up to 30 g L−1 or 330 mM (Nieuwoudt et al. 2002). Thus, comparison of the measured and expected contents of GlOH enables confirmation or challenging the originality of tested wines.
5.6 Conclusions
Enzymes possess high selectivity and sensitivity and are thus widely used in analytical test-systems for control of the environment and food, as well as for clinical diagnostics. Obtaining a wide range of target enzymes on an industrial scale from different sources, including recombinant microorganisms, is an urgent problem of biotechnology and enzymology. This chapter presents the main achievements in the elaboration of modern techniques for recombinant enzymes isolation from selected or recombinant yeasts. The results of a series of the authors’ investigations of these problems are summarized.
Some steps are necessary for isolating a highly purified, stable, and active yeast enzyme: selection or construction of the effective yeast producer, optimization of its cultivation conditions for achievement of the highest specific activity of enzyme in a cell-free extract, and development of an effective technology for target enzyme purification. The scheme for simultaneous isolation of several thermostable yeast enzymes from cells of the thermotolerant methylotrophic yeast O. polymorpha followed by their chromatographic purification using ion-exchange sorbent was proposed. The possibility of obtaining alcohol oxidase (AO), flavocytochrome b2 (Fc b2), glycerol dehydrogenase (GDH), methylamine oxidase (AMO), arginase, formaldehyde dehydrogenase (FdDH), formate dehydrogenase (FDH), and formaldehyde reductase (FR) from the cell-free extract of the same yeast source was demonstrated.
The highly purified yeast oxido-reductases (AO, FdDH, GDH and Fc b2) were isolated from O. polymorpha cells overproducing alcohol oxidase, as well as from other special yeast producers, including recombinant cells. The target enzymes were characterized and used as biocatalysts for the development of analytical methods for assaying primary alcohols, formaldehyde, glycerol, and L-lactate, respectively.
References
Ali MB, Gonchar M, Gayda G, Paryzhak S, Maaref MA, Jaffrezic-Renault N, Korpan Y (2007) Formaldehyde-sensitive sensor based on recombinant formaldehyde dehydrogenase using capacitance versus voltage measurements. Biosens Bioelectron 22(12):2790–2795
Allais JJ, Louktibi A, Baratti J (1983) Oxidation of methanol by the yeast Pichia pastoris. Purification and properties of the formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Agric Biol Chem 47(7):1509–1516
Arias CAD, Marques DAV, Malpiedi LP, Maranhão AQ, Parra DAS, Converti A, Junior AP (2017) Cultivation of Pichia pastoris carrying the scFv anti LDL (-) antibody fragment. Effect of preculture carbon source. Braz J Microbiol 48(3):419–426
Avalos J, Nordzieke S, Parra O, Pardo-Medina J, Carmen Limon M (2017) Carotenoid Production by Filamentous Fungi and Yeasts. In: Sibirny A. (eds) Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Springer, Cham pp 225–279
Baerends RJ, Sulter GJ, Jeffries TW (2002) Molecular characterization of the Hansenula polymorpha FLD1 gene encoding formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Yeast 19:37–42
Baghban R, Farajnia S, Ghasemi Y, Mortazavi M, Zarghami N, Samadi N (2018) New developments in Pichia pastoris expression system, review and update. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 19(6):451–467
Bao J, Huang M, Petranovic D, Nielsen J (2018) Balanced trafficking between the ER and the Golgi apparatus increases protein secretion in yeast. AMB Express 8:37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0571-x
Barrero JJ, Casler JC, Valero F, Ferrer P, Glick BS (2018) An improved secretion signal enhances the secretion of model proteins from Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Factories 17:161. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-1009-5
Bawa Z, Routledge SJ, Jamshad M, Clare M, Sarkar D, Dickerson I, Ganzlin M, Poyner DR, Bill RM (2014) Functional recombinant protein is present in the pre-induction phases of Pichia pastoris cultures when grown in bioreactors, but not shake-flasks. Microb Cell Factories 13(1):127. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-014-0127-y
Belda I, Ruiz J, Beisert B, Navascués E, Marquina D, Calderón F, Rauhut D, Benito S, Santos A (2017) Influence of Torulaspora delbrueckii in varietal thiol (3-SH and 4-MSP) release inwine sequential fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol 257:183–191
Berg L, Strand TA, Valla S, Brautaset T (2013) Combinatorial mutagenesis and selection to understand and improve yeast promoters. Biomed Res Int 2013:Article ID 926985, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/926985
Białkowska AM (2016) Strategies for efficient and economical 2,3-butanediol production: new trends in this field. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32(12):200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-016-2161-x
Bollella P, Sharma S, Cass AEG, Antiochia R (2019) Microneedle-based biosensor for minimally-invasive lactate detection. Biosens Bioelectron 123:152–159
Boteva R, Visser AJ, Filippi B, Vriend G, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ (1999) Conformational transitions accompanying oligomerization of yeast alcohol oxidase, a peroxisomal flavoenzyme. Biochemistry 38(16):5034–5044
Bredell H, Smith JJ, Prins WA, Görgens JF, van Zyl WH (2016) Expression of rotavirus VP6 protein: a comparison amongst Escherichia coli, Pichia pastoris and Hansenula polymorpha. FEMS Yeast Research 16 (2) fow001, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fow001
Bringer S, Sprey B, Sahm H (1979) Purification and properties of alcohol oxidase from Poria contigua. Eur J Biochem 101(2):563–570
Buckholz RG, Gleeson MA (1991) Yeast systems for the commercial production of heterologous proteins. Biotechnology (NY) 9(11):1067–1072
Chang CH, Hsiung HA, Hong KL, Huang CT (2018) Enhancing the efficiency of the Pichia pastoris AOX1 promoter via the synthetic positive feedback circuit of transcription factor Mxr1. BMC Biotechnol 18(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-018-0492-4
Chapman J, Ismail AE, Dinu CZ (2018) Industrial applications of enzymes: recent advances, techniques, and outlooks. Catalysts 8(238):1–26
Chen B, Lee HL, Heng YC, Chua N, Teo WS, Choi WJ, Leong SSJ, Foo JL, Chang MW (2018) Synthetic biology toolkits and applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Adv 36(7):1870–1881
Cho S, Kim T, Woo HM, Kim Y, Lee J, Um Y (2015) High production of 2,3-butanediol from biodiesel-derived crude glycerol by metabolically engineered Klebsiella oxytoca M1. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:146. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0336-6
Cregg JM, Barringer KJ, Hessler AY, Madden KR (1985) Pichia pastoris as a host system for transformations. Mol Cell Biol 5(12):3376–3385
Cregg JM, Madden KR, Barringer KJ, Thill GP, Stillman CA (1989) Functional characterization of the two alcohol oxidase genes from the yeast Pichia pastoris. Mol Cell Biol 9(3):1316–1323
Curvers S, Brixius P, Klauser T, Thömmes J, Weuster-Botz D, Takors R, Wandrey C (2001) Human chymotrypsinogen B production with Pichia pastoris by integrated development of fermentation and downstream processing. Part 1. Fermentation. Biotechnol Prog 17(3):495–502
Dagar K, Pundir CS (2018) Dataset on fabrication of an improved L-lactate biosensor based on lactate oxidase/cMWCNT/CuNPs/PANI modified PG electrode. Data Brief 17:1163–1167
Daly R, Hearn MT (2005) Expression of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastoris: a useful experimental tool in protein engineering and production: review. J Mol Recognit 18(2):119–138
Demkiv OM, SYa P, Krasovs’ka OS, Stasyk OV, Gayda GZ, Sibirny AA, Gonchar MV (2005) Construction of methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha strains over-producing formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Biopolymers and Cell 21(6):525–530. (in Ukrainian)
Demkiv OM, Paryzhak SY, Gayda GZ, Sibirny VA, Gonchar МV (2007) Formaldehyde dehydrogenase from the recombinant yeast Hansenula polymorpha: іsolation and bioanalytic application. FEMS Yeast Res 7:1153–1159
Demkiv O, Smutok O, Paryzhak S, Gayda G, Sultanov Y, Guschin D, Shkil H, Schuhmann W, Gonchar M (2008) Reagentless amperometric formaldehyde-selective biosensors based on the recombinant yeast formaldehyde dehydrogenase. Talanta 76(4):837–846
Demkiv OM, Paryzhak SY, Ishchuk OP, Gayda GZ, Gonchar MV (2011) Activities of the enzymes of formaldehyde catabolism in recombinant strains of Hansenula polymorpha. Mirobiology 80(3):307–313
Dijkman WP, de Gonzalo G, Mattevi A, Fraaije MW (2013) Flavoprotein oxidases: classification and applications: review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(12):5177–5188
Dmytruk KV, Smutok OV, Ryabova OB, Gayda GZ, Sibirny VA, Schuhmann W, Gonchar MV, Sibirny AA (2007) Isolation and characterization of mutated alcohol oxidases from the yeast Hansenula polymorpha with decreased affinity toward substrates and their use as selective elements of an amperometric biosensor. BMC Biotechnol 7(7):1–7
Dmytruk KV, Kurylenko OO, Ruchala J, Abbas CA, Sibirny AA (2017) Genetic Improvement of Conventional and Nonconventional Yeasts for the Production of First- and Second-Generation Ethanol. In: Sibirny A. (eds) Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Springer, Cham pp 1–38
Domínguez A, Fermiñán E, Sánchez M, González FJ, Pérez-Campo FM, García S, Herrero AB, San Vicente A, Cabello J, Prado M, Iglesias FJ, Choupina A, Burguillo FJ, Fernández-Lago L, López MC (1998) Non-conventional yeasts as hosts for heterologous protein production. Int Microbiol 1(2):131–142
Eggeling L, Sahm H (1980) Direct enzymatic assay for Alcohol Oxidase, Alcohol Dehydrogenase, and Formaldehyde Dehydrogenase in colonies of Hansenula polymorpha. Appl Environ Microbiol 39(1):268–269
Ekas H, Deaner M, Alper HS (2019) Recent advancements in fungal-derived fuel and chemical production and commercialization. Curr Opin Chem Biol 57:1–9
Engleder M, Horvat M, Emmerstorfer-Augustin A, Wriessnegger T, Gabriel S, Strohmeier G, Weber H, Müller M, Kaluzna I, Mink D, Schürmann M, Pichler H (2018) Recombinant expression, purification and biochemical characterization of kievitone hydratase from Nectria haematococca. PLoS One 13(2):e0192653. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192653
Fernandes FJ, López-Estepa M, Querol-García J, Vega MC (2016) Production of protein complexes in non-methylotrophic and methylotrophic Yeasts: nonmethylotrophic and methylotrophic Yeasts. Adv Exp Med Biol 896:137–153
Fletcher E, Krivoruchko A, Nielsen J (2016) Industrial systems biology and its impact on synthetic biology of yeast cell factories. Biotechnol Bioeng 113(6):1164–1170
Gadda G (2008) Hydride transfer made easy in the reaction of alcohol oxidation catalyzed by flavin-dependent oxidases: review. Biochemist 47(52):13745–13753
Gaida GZ, Stel'mashchuk SY, Smutok OV, Gonchar MV (2003) A new method of visualization of the enzymatic activity of flavocytochrome b2 in electrophoretograms. Appl Biochem Microbiol 39(2):221–223
Gartner G, Kopperschlager G (1984) Purification and Properties of Glycerol Dehydrogenase from Candida valida. Microbiology 130: 3225–3233
Gayda G, Demkiv O, Gonchar M, Paryzhak S, Schuhmann W (2008a) Recombinant formaldehyde dehydrogenase and gene-engineered methylotrophic yeasts as bioanalitycal instruments for assay of toxic formaldehyde. In: Evangelista V et al (eds) Algal toxins: nature, occurrence, effect and detection, NATO science for peace and security series A: Chemistry and biology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 311–333
Gayda G, Paryzhak S, Demkiv O, Ksheminska H, Gonchar M (2008b) Formaldehyde reductase from formaldehyde-resistant gene-engineered methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha: isolation and characterization: 12th International Congress on Yeast, Kyiv, Ukraine. August 11–15, p 304
Gayda G, Pavlishko H, Stasyuk N, Ivash M, Bilek M, Broda D, Gonchar M (2013a) Application of recombinant glycerol dehydrogenase for glycerol assay in wines. 5 th Polish-Ukrainian Weigl conference on Microbiology. Chernivtsi, Ukraine May 23–25, p 72
Gayda G, Stasyuk N, Demkiv O, Klepach H, Broda D, Sibirny A, Gonchar M (2013b) New enzymatic methods for wine assay. International conference Biocatalysis-2013: fundamentals and applications. Moscow, Russia, July 2–5, pp 71–72
Gayda G, Demkiv O, Klepach H, Gonchar M, Levy-Halaf R, Wolf D, Nisnevitch M (2015) Formaldehyde: detection and biodegradation (Chapter 6). In: Patton A (ed) Formaldehyde: synthesis, applications and potential health effects. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 117–142. ISBN: 978-1-63482-412-5
Gayda GZ, Demkiv OM, Stasyuk NYe, Serkiz RYa, Lootsik MD, Errachid A, Gonchar MV, Nisnevitch M (2019) Metallic nanoparticles obtained via “green” synthesis as a platform for biosensor construction. Appl Sci 9:720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9040720
Gellissen G, Kunze G, Gaillardin C, Cregg JM, Berardi E, Veenhuis M, van der Klei I (2005) New yeast expression platforms based on methylotrophic Hansenula polymorpha and Pichia pastoris and on dimorphic Arxula adeninivorans and Yarrowia lipolytica – a comparison. EMS Yeast Res 5(11):1079–1096
Gerpen JV (2005) Biodiesel processing and production. Fuel Proces Technol 86 (10): 1097–1107
Gonchar MV, Ksheminska GP, Hladarevska NM, Sibirny AA (1990) Catalase-minus mutants of methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha impaired in regulation of alcohol oxidase synthesis. In: Lachowicz TM (Ed) Genetics of Respiratory Enzymes in Yeasts. Wroclaw University Press, Wroclaw, Poland, pp. 222–228
Gonchar MV, Maidan MM, Pavlishko HM, Sibirny AA (2001) A New Oxidase-Peroxidase Kit for Ethanol Assays in Alcoholic Beverages. Food technol. Biotechnol 39(1):37–42
Gonchar M, Maidan M, Korpan Y, Sibirny V, Kotylak Z, Sibirny A (2002) Metabolically engineered methylotrophic yeast cells and enzymes as sensor biorecognition elements. FEMS Yeast Res 2:307–314
Gonchar M, Smutok O, Os’mak H (2009) Flavocytochrome b2-based enzymatic composition, method and kit for L-lactate. Patent Application PCT/US2008/069637 Publ.WO/2009/009656: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?WO=2009009656
Gonchar M, Smutok O, Karkovska M, Stasyuk N, Gayda G (2017) Yeast-based biosensors for clinical diagnostics and food control. In: "Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi" (Ed. A.A. Sibirny). Springer, P. 392–400
Goold HD, Kroukamp H, Williams TC, Paulsen IT, Varela C, Pretorius IS (2017) Yeast's balancing act between ethanol and glycerol production in low-alcohol wines. Microb Biotechnol 10(2):264–278
Goriushkina TB, Orlova AP, Smutok OV, Gonchar MV, Soldatkin AP, Dzyadevych SV (2009) Application of L-lactate-cytochrome c-oxidoreductase for development of amperometric biosensor for L -lactate determination. Biopolymers and Cell 25(3):194–202
Goriushkina TB, Shkotova LV, Gayda GZ, Klepach HM, Gonchar MV, Soldatkin AP, Dziyadevych SV (2010) Amperometric biosensor based on glycerol oxidase for glycerol determination. Sensor Actuat B Chem 144:361–367
Goswami P, Chinnadayyala SS, Chakraborty M, Kumar AK, Kakoti A (2013) An overview on alcohol oxidases and their potential applications: review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(10):4259–4275
Grewal N, Parveen Z, Large A, Perry C, Connock M (2000) Gastropod mollusc aliphatic alcohol oxidase: subcellular localisation and properties. Comp Biochem Physiol B: Biochem Mol Biol 125(4):543–554
Griesemer M, Young C, Robinson AS, Petzold L (2014) BiP clustering facilitates protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Comput Biol 10(7):e1003675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003675
Gunkel K, van Dijk R, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ (2004) Routing of Hansenula polymorpha alcohol oxidase: an alternative peroxisomal protein-sorting machinery. Mol Biol Cell 15(3):1347–1355
Gvozdev AR, Tukhvatullin IA, Gvozdev RI (2012) Quinone-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases and FAD-dependent alcohol oxidases: review. Biochem Mosc 77(8):843–856
Hartner FS, Glieder A (2006) Regulation of methanol utilisation pathway genes in yeasts. Microb Cell Factories 5(39):1–21
Hemmerich J, Adelantado N, Barrigón JM, Ponte X, Hörmann A, Ferrer P, Kensy F, Valero F (2014) Comprehensive clone screening and evaluation of fed-batch strategies in a microbioreactor and lab scale stirred tank bioreactor system: application on Pichia pastoris producing Rhizopus oryzae lipase. Microb Cell Factories 13(1):36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-36
Hernández-Ortega A, Ferreira P, Martínez AT (2012) Fungal aryl-alcohol oxidase: a peroxide-producing flavoenzyme involved in lignin degradation: review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93(4):1395–1410
Feed enzymes market. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/market-reports/feed-enzyme-market-1157.html. Accessed on 19 Feb 2019
Industrial Enzymes Market. http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/industrial-enzymes-market-237327836.html. Accessed on 19 Feb 2019
Pharmaion. India Industrial Enzymes Market Forecast and Opportunities, 2020 http://www.pharmaion.com/report/india-industrial-enzymes-market-forecast-and-opportunities-2020/10.html. Accessed on 19 Feb 2019
Sigma products. https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma
Huang M, Wang G, Qin J, Petranovic D, Nielsen J (2018a) Engineering the protein secretory pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae enables improved protein production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115(47):E11025–E11032
Huang M, Joensson HN, Nielsen J (2018b) High-throughput microfluidics for the screening of yeast libraries. Methods Mol Biol 1671:307–317
Idiris A, Tohda H, Kumagai H, Takegawa K (2010) Engineering of protein secretion in yeast: strategies and impact on protein production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86(2):403–417
Isobe K, Takahashi T, Ogawa J, Kataoka M, Shimizu S (2009) Production and characterization of alcohol oxidase from Penicillium purpurescens AIU 063. J Biosci Bioeng 107(2):108–112
Janssen FW, Ruelius HW (1968) Alcohol oxidase, a flavoprotein from several Basidiomycetes species. Crystallization by fractional precipitation with polyethylene glycol. Biochim Biophys Acta 151(2):330–342
Jullessen D, David F, Pfleger B, Nielsen J (2015) Impact of synthetic biology and metabolic engineering on industrial production of fine chemicals. Biotechnol Adv 33(7):1395–1402
Juturu V, Wu JC (2018) Heterologous protein expression in Pichia pastoris: latest research progress and applications. Chembiochem 19(1):7–21
Karkovska M, Smutok O, Stasyuk N, Gonchar M (2015) L-lactate-selective microbial sensor based on flavocytochrome b2-enriched yeast cells using recombinant and nanotechnology approaches. Talanta 144:1195–1200
Karkovska МІ, Stasyuk NYe, Gayda GZ, Smutok OV, Gonchar MV (2017) Nanomaterials in construction of biosensors of biomedical purposes. In: Stoika R (Ed) Multifunctional nanomaterials for biology and medicine: molecular design, synthesis, and application. pp. 165–177 (in Ukrainian)
Kato N (1990) Formaldehyde dehydrogenase from methylotrophic yeasts. Methods Enzymol 188:455–459
Kim H, Yoo SJ, Kang HA (2015) Yeast synthetic biology for the production of recombinant therapeutic proteins. FEMS Yeast Res 15(1):1–16
Kim JW, Kim J, Seo SO, Kim KH, Jin YS, Seo JH (2016) Enhanced production of 2,3-butanediol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae through fine-tuning of pyruvate decarboxylase and NADH oxidase activities. Biotechno Biofuels 9:265. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0677-9
Koch C, Neumann P, Valerius O, Feussner I, Ficner R (2016) Crystal structure of alcohol oxidase from Pichia pastoris. PLoS One 11(2):e0149846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149846. eCollection
Kondo T, Morikawa Y, Hayashi N (2008) Purification and characterization of alcohol oxidase from Paecilomyces variotii isolated as a formaldehyde-resistant fungus. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77(5):995–1002
Krasovska OS, Babiak LIa Nazarko TY, Stasyk OG, Danysh TV, Gayda GZ, Stasyk OV, Gonchar MV, Sybirny АА (2006) Construction of yeast Hansenula polymorpha overproducing amine oxidase as bioselective element of sensors for biogenic amines. In: El’skaya AV, Pokhodenko VD (eds) Investigations on sensor systems and technologies, vol 1. IMBG of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, pp 141–148
Krasovska OS, Stasyk OG, Nahorny VO, Stasyk OV, Granovski N, Kordium VA, Vozianov OF, Sibirny AA (2007) Glucose-induced production of recombinant proteins in Hansenula polymorpha mutants deficient in catabolite repression. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(4):858–870
Krivoruchko A, Siewers V, Nielsen J (2011) Opportunities for yeast metabolic engineering: lessons from synthetic biology. Biotechnol J 6(3):262–276
Kumar V, Park S (2018) Potential and limitations of Klebsiella pneumoniae as a microbial cell factory utilizing glycerol as the carbon source. Biotechnol Adv 36(1):150–167
Leferink NG, Heuts DP, Fraaije MW, van Berkel WJ (2008) The growing VAO flavoprotein family: review. Arch Biochem Biophys 474(2):292–301
Li M, Li M, Wu J, Liu X, Lin J, Wei D, Chen H (2010). Enhanced production of dihydroxyacetone from glycerol by overexpression of glycerol dehydrogenase in an alcohol dehydrogenase-deficient mutant of Gluconobacter oxydans. Bioresour Technol 101 (21): 8294-8299
Liu W-C, Zhu P (2018) Demonstration-scale high-cell-density fermentation of Pichia pastoris. Recombinant Glycoprotein Production – 2018 Methods and Protocols Part of the Methods in Molecular Biology book series. MIMB 1674:109–116
Liu C, Yang X, Yao Y, Huang W, Sun W, Ma Y (2014) Diverse expression levels of two codon-optimized genes that encode human papilloma virus type 16 major protein L1 in Hansenula polymorpha. Biotechnol Lett 36(5):937–945
Liu J, Wu S, Li Z (2018) Recent advances in enzymatic oxidation of alcohols: review. Curr Opin Chem Biol 43:77–86
Löbs AK, Schwartz C, Wheeldon I (2017) Genome and metabolic engineering in non-conventional yeasts: current advances and applications. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2(3):198–207
Love KR, Dalvie NC, Love JC (2018) The yeast stands alone: the future of protein biologic production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 53:50–58
Lusta KA, Leonovitch OA, Tolstorukov II, Rabinovich YM (2000) Constitutive biosynthesis and localization of alcohol oxidase in the ethanol-insensitive catabolite repression mutant ecr1 of the yeast Pichia methanolica. Biochem Mosc 65(5):604–608
Lv M, Liu Y, Geng J, Kou X, Xin Z, Yang D (2018) Engineering nanomaterials-based biosensors for food safety detection. Biosens Bioelectron 106:122–128
Mack M, Wannemacher M, Hobl B, Pietschmann P, Hock B (2009) Comparison of two expression platforms in respect to protein yield and quality: Pichia pastoris versus Pichia angusta. Protein Expr Purif 66(2):165–171
Mahadevan A, Fernando S (2016) An improved glycerol biosensor with an Au-FeS-NAD-glycerol-dehydrogenase anode. Biosens Bioelectron 92:417–424
Mallinder P, Pritchard A, Moir A (1992) Cloning and characterization of a gene from Bacillus stearothermophilus var. non-diastaticus encoding a glycerol dehydrogenase. Gene 110 (1): 9–16
Mangkorn N, Kanokratana P, Roongsawang N, Laobuthee A, Laosiripojana N, Champreda V (2019) Synthesis and characterization of Ogataea thermomethanolica alcohol oxidase immobilized on barium ferrite magnetic microparticles. J Biosci Bioeng 127(3):265–272
Mattanovich D, Sauer M, Gasser B (2014) Yeast biotechnology: teaching the old dog new tricks. Microb Cell Factories 13(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-34
Mincey T, Tayrien G, Mildvan AS, Abeles RH (1980) Presence of a flavin semiquinone in methanol oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77(12):7099–7101
Müller S, Sandal T, Kamp-Hansen P, Dalbøge H (1998) Comparison of expression systems in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Hansenula polymorpha, Klyveromyces lactis, Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Yarrowia lipolytica. Cloning of two novel promoters from Yarrowia lipolytica. Yeast 14(14):1267–1283
Nakamura Y, Nishi T, Noguchi R, Ito Y, Watanabe T, Nishiyama T, Aikawa S, Hasunuma T, Ishii J, Okubo Y, Kondo A (2018) A stable, autonomously replicating plasmid vector containing Pichia pastoris Centromeric DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 84(15):e02882–e02817. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02882-17
Nguyen H, Nevoigt E (2009) Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of dihydroxyacetone (DHA) from sugars: a proof of concept. Metab Eng 11: 335–346
Nguyen QT, Romero E, Dijkman WP, de Vasconcellos SP, Binda C, Mattevi A, Fraaije MW (2018) Structure-based engineering of Phanerochaete chrysosporium alcohol oxidase for enhanced oxidative power toward glycerol. Biochemistry 57(43):6209–6218
Nieuwoudt HH, Prior BA, Pretorius S, Bauer FF (2002) Glycerol in South African table wines: an assessment of its relationship to wine quality. Afr J Enol Vitic 23(1):22–30
Nikitina O, Shleev S, Gayda G, Demkiv O, Gonchar M, Gorton L, Csöregi E, Nistor M (2007) Bi-enzyme biosensor based on NAD+- and glutathione-dependent recombinant formaldehyde dehydrogenase and diaphorase for formaldehyde assay. Sensors Actuators B 125:1–9
Nikolelis DP, Nikoleli GP (2016) Biosensors for security and bioterrorism applications. Springer Int Publi, Switzerland ISBN 978-3-319-28926-7
Nora LC, Westmann CA, Martins-Santana L, Alves LF, Monteiro LMO, Guazzaroni ME, Silva-Rocha R (2019) The art of vector engineering: towards the construction of next-generation genetic tools. Microb Biotechnol 12(1):125–147
Oh BR, Lee SM, Heo SY, Seo JW, Kim CH (2018) Efficient production of 1,3-propanediol from crude glycerol by repeated fed-batch fermentation strategy of a lactate and 2,3-butanediol deficient mutant of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb Cell Factories 17(1):92. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-018-0921-z
Owczarek B, Gerszberg A, Hnatuszko-Konka K (2019) A Brief Reminder of Systems of Production and Chromatography-Based Recovery of Recombinant Protein Biopharmaceuticals. Biomed Res Int 2019:4216060. doi: 10.1155/2019/4216060. eCollection 2019
Ozimek P, Veenhuis M, van der Klei IJ (2005) Alcohol oxidase: a complex peroxisomal, oligomeric flavoprotein. FEMS Yeast Res 5(11):975–983
Panadare D, Rathod KV (2018) Extraction and purification of polyphenol oxidase: a review. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 14:431–437
Passoth V (2017) Lipids of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi and Their Importance for Biotechnology. In: Sibirny A. (eds) Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Springer, Cham pp 149–204
Patel RN, Hou CN, Derelanko P (1983) Microbial oxidation of methanol: purification and properties of formaldehyde dehydrogenase from a Pichia sp. NRRL-Y-11328. Arch Biochem Biophys 221(1):135–142
Pavlishko HM, Ryabinina OV, Zhilyakova TA, Sakharov IYu, Gerzhikova VG, Gonchar MV (2005) Oxidase-peroxidase method of ethanol assay in fermented musts and wine products. Appl Biochem Microbiol 41 (6): 604–609
Peña DA, Gasser B, Zanghellini J, Steiger MG, Mattanovich D (2018) Metabolic engineering of Pichia pastoris. Metab Eng 50:2–15
Pickl M, Fuchs M, Glueck SM, Faber K (2015) The substrate tolerance of alcohol oxidases: review. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(16):6617–6642
Pobre KFR, Poet GJ, Hendershot LM (2018) The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone BiP is a master regulator of ER functions: getting by with a little help from ERdj friends. J Biol Chem 294(6):2098–2108
Porro D, Branduardi P (2017) Production of Organic Acids by Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. In: Sibirny A. (eds) Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Springer, Cham pp 205–223
Portela RMC, Vogl T, Ebner K, Oliveira R, Glieder A (2018) Pichia pastoris alcohol oxidase 1 (AOX1) core promoter engineering by high resolution systematic mutagenesis. Biotechnol J 13(3):e1700340. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700340
Rahman MS, Xu CC, Ma K, Nanda M, Qin W (2017) High production of 2,3-butanediol by a mutant strain of the newly isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae SRP2 with increased tolerance towards glycerol. Int J Biol Sci 13(3):308–318
Rajamanickam V, Metzger K, Schmid C, Spadiut O (2017) A novel bi-directional promoter system allows tunable recombinant protein production in Pichia pastoris. Microb Cell Factories 16:152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-017-0768-8
Rankine BC, Bridson DA (1974) Glycerol in australian wines and factors influencing its formation. http://www.ajevonline.org/content/ajev/22/1/6.full.pdf
Rassaei L, Olthuis W, Tsujimura S, Sudhölter EJ, van den Berg A (2014) Lactate biosensors: current status and outlook. Anal Bioanal Chem 406(1):123–137
Rathee K, Dhull V, Dhull R, Singh S (2016) Biosensors based on electrochemical lactate detection: a comprehensive review. Biochem Biophys Rep 11(5):35–54
Rebello S, Abraham A, Madhavan A, Sindhu R, Binod P, Karthika Bahuleyan A, Aneesh EM, Pandey A (2018) Non-conventional yeast cell factories for sustainable bioprocesses. FEMS Microbiol Lett 365(21). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny222
Reiser J, Glumoff V, Kälin M, Ochsner U (1990) Transfer and expression of heterologous genes in yeasts other than Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 43:75–102
Remize F, Cambon B, Barnavon L, Dequin S (2003) Glycerol formation during wine fermentation is mainly linked to Gpd1p and is only partially controlled by the HOG pathway. Yeast 20: 1243–1253
Reyes De Corcuera JI, Powers JR (2017) Application of Enzymes in Food Analysis. In: Food Analysis, Nielsen, S.S. Editor, Springer, pp.469–486
Romero E, Gadda G (2014) Alcohol oxidation by flavoenzymes: review. Biomol Concepts 5(4):299–318
Rosati G, Gherardi G, Grigoletto D, Marcolin G, Cancellara P, Mammucari C, Scaramuzza M, Toni AD, Reggiani C, Rizzuto R, Paccagnella A (2018) Lactate Dehydrogenase and Glutamate Pyruvate Transaminase biosensing strategies for lactate detection on screen-printed sensors. Catalysis efficiency and interference analysis in complex matrices: from cell cultures to sport medicine. Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research 21: 54–64
Rueda F, Gasser B, Sánchez-Chardi A, Roldán M, Villegas S, Puxbaum V, Ferrer-Miralles N, Unzueta U, Vázquez E, Garcia-Fruitós E, Mattanovich D, Villaverde A (2016) Functional inclusion bodies produced in the yeast Pichia pastoris Microbial Cell Factories 15:166 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0565-9
Ruzheinikov SN, Burke J, Sedelnikova S, Baker PJ, Taylor R, Bullough PA, Muir NM, Gore MG, Rice DW (2001) Glycerol Dehydrogenase. Structure 9 (9): 789–802
Sagiroglu A, Altay V (2006) Bioconversion of methanol to formaldehyde. II. By purified methanol oxidase from modified yeast, Hansenula polymorpha. Prep Biochem Biotechnol 36(4):321–332
Sahm H, Wagner F (1973) Microbial assimilation of methanol. The ethanol- and methanol-oxidizing enzymes of the yeast Candida boidinii. Eur J Biochem 36(1):250–256
Semkiv M, Dmytruk K, Abbas C (2017) Biotechnology of Glycerol Production and Conversion in Yeasts. In: Sibirny A. (eds) Biotechnology of Yeasts and Filamentous Fungi. Springer, Cham 8 pp117–148
Shang T, Si D, Zhang D, Liu X, Zhao L, Hu C, Fu Y, Zhang R (2017) Enhancement of thermoalkaliphilic xylanase production by Pichia pastoris through novel fed-batch strategy in high cell-density fermentation. BMC Biotechnol 17(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12896-017-0361-6
Sharma S, Saeed A, Johnson C, Gadegaard N, Cass AE (2017) Rapid, low cost prototyping of transdermal devices for personal healthcare monitoring. Sens Bio-Sens Res 13:104–108
Shen W, Xue Y, Liu Y, Kong C, Wang X, Huang M, Cai M, Zhou X, Zhang Y, Zhou M (2016) A novel methanol-free Pichia pastoris system for recombinant protein expression. Microb Cell Factories 15(1):178. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0578-4
Shkotova LV, Soldatkin AP, Gonchar MV, Schuhmann W, Dzyadevych SV (2006) Amperometric biosensor for ethanol detection based on alcohol oxidase immobilised within electrochemically deposited Resydrol film. Mater Sci Eng C 26:411–414
Shleev SV, Shumakovich GP, Nikitina OV, Morozova OV, Pavlishko HM, Gayda GZ, Gonchar MV (2006) Purification and characterization of alcohol oxidase from a genetically constructed over-producing strain of the methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Biochem Mosc 71(3):245–250
Sibirny AA (Ed) (2017) Book: Biotechnology of yeasts and filamentous fungi. Springer, ISBN 978-3-319-58829-2
Sibirny AA, Titorenko VI, Gonchar MV, Ubiyvovk VM, Ksheminskaya GP, Vitvitskaya OP (1988) Genetic control of methanol utilization in yeasts. J Basic Microbiol 28(5):293–319
Sibirny V, Demkiv O, Klepach H, Honchar T, Gonchar M (2011a) Alcohol oxidase- and formaldehyde dehydrogenase-based enzymatic methods for formaldehyde assay in fish food products. Food Chem 127:774–779
Sibirny V, Demkiv O, Sigawi S, Paryzhak S, Klepach H, Korpan Y, Smutok O, Nisnevich M, Gayda G, Nitzan Y, Puchalski C, Gonchar M (2011b) Formaldehyde oxidizing enzymes and genetically modified yeast Hansenula polymorpha cells in monitoring and removal of formaldehyde. In: Einschlag FSG (Ed) Waste Water – Evaluation and Management. ISBN 978-953-307-233-3. InTech (Croatia) (6):115-154
Sigawi S, Smutok O, Demkiv O, Zakalska O, Gayda G, Nitzan Y, Nisnevitch M, Gonchar M (2011) Immobilized formaldehyde-metabolizing enzymes from Hansenula polymorpha for removal and control of airborne formaldehyde. J Biotechnol 153:138–144
Sigawi S, Smutok O, Demkiv O, Gayda G, Vus B, Nitzan Y, Gonchar M, Nisnevitch M (2014) Detection of waterborne and airborne formaldehyde: from amperometric chemosensing to a visual biosensor based on alcohol oxidase. Materials 7: 1055–1068
Singh R, Kumar M, Mitta A, Mehta PK (2016) Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century: review. 3 Biotech 6:174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0485-8
Smith JJ, Burke A, Bredell H, van Zyl WH, Görgens JF (2012) Comparing cytosolic expression to peroxisomal targeting of the chimeric L1/L2 (ChiΔH-L2) gene from human papillomavirus type 16 in the methylotrophic yeasts Pichia pastoris and Hansenula polymorpha. Yeast 29(9):385–393
Smutok O, Gayda G, Gonchar M, Schuhmann W (2005) A novel L-lactate-selective biosensor based on the use of flavocytochrome b2 from methylotrophic yeast Hansenula polymorpha. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1285–1290
Smutok O, Gayda G, Shuhmann W, Gonchar M (2006a) Development of L-lactate-selective biosensors based on thermostable yeast L-lactate: cytochrome c-oxidoreductase. In: El’skaya AV, Pokhodenko VD (eds) Investigations on sensor systems and technologies. IMBG of NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, pp 39–45
Smutok O, Ngounou B, Pavlishko H, Gayda G, Gonchar M, Schuhmann W (2006b) A reagentless bienzyme amperometric biosensor based on alcohol oxidase/peroxidase and an Os-complex modified electrodeposition paint. Sensors Actuators B Chem 113(2):590–598
Smutok OV, Os’mak GS, Gaida GZ, Gonchar MV (2006c) Screening of yeasts producing stable L-lactate cytochrome c oxidoreductase and study of the regulation of enzyme synthesis. Microbiology (Moscow) 75(1):20–24
Smutok O, Gayda G, Dmytruk K, Klepach H, Nisnevitch M, Sibirny A, Puchalski C, Broda D, Schuhmann W, Gonchar M, Sibirny V (2011) Amperometric biosensors for Lactate, Alcohols, and Glycerol assays in clinical diagnostics. Chapter 20. Іn: Serra PA (Ed) Biosensors – emerging materials and applications. ISBN 978-953-307-328-6. InTech (Croatia) pp 401–446
Smutok O, Karkovska M, Smutok H, Gonchar M (2013) Flavocytochrome b2-based enzymatic method of L-lactate assay in food products. The Scientific World Journal 2013: Article ID 461284, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/461284
Smutok O, Karkovska M, Serkiz Ya, Vus B, Čenas N, Gonchar M (2017) A Novel Mediatorless Biosensor Based On Flavocytochrome b2 Immobilized Onto Gold Nanoclusters For Non-invasive L-lactate Analysis Of Human Liquids. Sensor & Actuators B 250: 469–475
Song H, Li Y, Fang W, Geng Y, Wang X, Wang M, Qiu B (2003) Development of a set of expression vectors in Hansenula polymorpha. Biotechnol Lett 25(23):1999–2006
Sperry AE, Sen SE (2001) Farnesol oxidation in insects: evidence that the biosynthesis of insect juvenile hormone is mediated by a specific alcohol oxidase. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 31(2):171–178
Stasyk O (2017) Methylotrophic yeasts as producers of recombinant proteins. In: Sibirny AA (Ed) Biotechnology of yeasts and filamentous fungi. ISBN 978-3-319-58829-2. Springer, pp 325–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58829-2
Stasyuk N, Gaida G, Gonchar M (2013) L-arginine assay with the use of arginase I. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology (Moscow) 49(5):529–534
Stasyuk N, Gayda G, Zakalskiy A, Zakalska O, Serkiz R, Gonchar M (2019) Amperometric biosensors based on oxidases and PtRu nanoparticles as artificial peroxidase. Food Chemistry 285: 213–220
Sturmberger L, Chappell T, Geier M, Krainer F, Day KJ, Vide U, Trstenjak S, Schiefer A, Richardson T, Soriaga L, Darnhofer B, Birner-Gruenberger R, Glick BS, Tolstorukov I, Cregg J, Madden K, Glieder A (2016) Refined Pichia pastoris reference genome sequence. J Biotechnol 235:121–131
Sudbery PE (1996) The expression of recombinant proteins in yeasts. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7(5):517–524
Sützl L, Laurent CVFP, Abrera AT, Schütz G, Ludwig R, Haltrich D (2018) Multiplicity of enzymatic functions in the CAZy AA3 family. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(6):2477–2492
Synenka M, Gayda G, Klepach H, Ivash M, Gonchar M (2015) Isolation and characterization of recombinant yeast glyceroldehydrogenase. ScienceRise 8(13):7–11. (In Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.15587/2313-8416.2015.48369
Talebian-Kiakalaieh A, Amin NAS, Najaafi N, Tarighi S (2018) A review on the catalytic acetalization of bio-renewable glycerol to fuel additives. Front Chem 6(573). https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2018.00573
Talebkhan Y, Samadi T, Samie A, Barkhordari F, Azizi M, Khalaj V, Mirabzadeh E (2016) Expression of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF) in Hansenula polymorpha. Iran J Microbiol 8(1):21–28
Theron CW, Berrios J, Delvigne F, Fickers P (2018) Integrating metabolic modeling and population heterogeneity analysis into optimizing recombinant protein production by Komagataella (Pichia) pastoris. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102(1):63–80
Thomas AS, Krikken AM, de Boer R, Williams C (2018) Hansenula polymorpha Aat2p is targeted to peroxisomes via a novel Pex20p-dependent pathway. FEBS Lett 592(14):2466–2475
Thömmes J, Halfar M, Gieren H, Curvers S, Takors R, Brunschier R, Kula MR (2001) Human chymotrypsinogen B production from Pichia pastoris by integrated development of fermentation and downstream processing. Part 2. Protein recovery. Biotechnol Prog 17(3):503–512
van Berkel WJH (2018) Special issue: Flavoenzymes (Editorial). Molecules 23(8):1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23081957
van der Klei IJ, Harder W, Veenhuis M (1991) Biosynthesis and assembly of alcohol oxidase, a peroxisomal matrix protein in methylotrophic yeasts: a review. Yeast 7(3):195–209
Vandermies M, Fickers P (2019) Bioreactor-Scale Strategies for the Production of Recombinant Protein in the Yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Microorganisms 7(2) h pii: E40. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7020040
Vieira Gomes AM, Souza Carmo T, Silva Carvalho L, Mendonça Bahia F, Parachin NS (2018) Comparison of yeasts as hosts for recombinant protein production. Microorganisms 6(2):E38. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms6020038
Vogl T, Gebbie L, Palfreyman RW, Speight R (2018) Effect of plasmid design and type of integration event on recombinant protein expression in Pichia pastoris. Appl Environ Microbiol 84(6):e02712–e02717. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02712-17
Vonck J, Parcej DN, Mills DJ (2016) Structure of alcohol oxidase from Pichia pastoris by cryo-electron microscopy. PLoS One 11(7):e0159476. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159476
Wagner JM, Alper HS (2016) Synthetic biology and molecular genetics in non-conventional yeasts: current tools and future advances. Fungal Genet Biol 89:126–136
Walker RSK, Pretorius IS (2018) Applications of yeast synthetic biology geared towards the production of biopharmaceuticals. Genes (Basel) 9(7):e340. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9070340
Weninger A, Hatzl AM, Schmid C, Vogl T, Glieder A (2016) Combinatorial optimization of CRISPR/Cas9 expression enables precision genome engineering in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris. J Biotechnol 235:139–149
Wongnate T, Chaiyen P (2013) The substrate oxidation mechanism of pyranose 2-oxidase and other related enzymes in the glucose-methanol-choline superfamily: review. FEBS J 280(13):3009–3027
Xiao Y, Zhao P, Du J, Li X, Lu W, Hao X, Dong B, Yu Y, Wang L (2018) High-level expression and immunogenicity of porcine circovirus type 2b capsid protein without nuclear localization signal expressed in Hansenula polymorpha. Biologicals 51:18–24
Xu P (2018) Production of chemicals using dynamic control of metabolic fluxes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 53:12–19
Yamada H, Nagao A, Nishise H, Tani Y (1982) Glycerol Dehydrogenase from Cellulomonas sp. NT 3060: Purification and Characterisation. Agnc Bioi Chem 46 (9): 1333–1339
Yamada-Onodera K, Yamamoto H, Emoto E, Kawahara N, Tani Y (2002) Characterisation of glycerol dehydrogenase from a methylotrophic yeast, Hansenula polymorpha Dl-1, and its gene cloning. Acta Biotechnol 22: 337–353
Yang Z, Zhang Z (2018a) Engineering strategies for enhanced production of protein and bio-products in Pichia pastoris: review. Biotechnol Adv 36(1):182–195
Yang Z, Zhang Z (2018b) Recent advances on production of 2, 3-butanediol using engineered microbes. Biotechnol Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.03.019, in press
Yurimoto H (2009) Molecular basis of methanol-inducible gene expression and its application in the methylotrophic yeast Candida boidinii. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 73(4):793–800
Zepeda AB, Figueroa CA, Pessoa A, Farías JG (2018a) Free fatty acids reduce metabolic stress and favor a stable production of heterologous proteins in Pichia pastoris. Braz J Microbiol 49(4):856–864
Zepeda AB, Pessoa A Jr, Farías JG (2018b) Carbon metabolism influenced for promoters and temperature used in the heterologous protein production using Pichia pastoris yeast. Braz J Microbiol 49(Suppl 1):119–127
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gayda, G.Z., Demkiv, O.M., Klepach, H.M., Gonchar, M.V., Nisnevitch, M. (2019). Effective Technologies for Isolating Yeast Oxido-Reductases of Analytical Importance. In: Sibirny, A. (eds) Non-conventional Yeasts: from Basic Research to Application. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21110-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21110-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-21109-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-21110-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)