Abstract
Brainstem tumors are a disparate group of tumors that span the regions of the midbrain to the cervicomedullary junction (Fig. 20.1). They most frequently occur in children and lack a specific gender predilection. Over the past two decades, we have become increasingly more familiar with their characteristic patient symptom complex, their specific neuroimaging features, and a standardized approach to therapy. That said, there are still a number of challenges that are posed by tumors in this critical region of the neuraxis. As each tumor subtype could be the subject of an independent chapter, here, we will review the main patient presentations, the key neuroimaging features, and the goals of surgical and non-operative therapies for children with brainstem tumors.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
Brainstem tumors are a disparate group of tumors that span the regions of the midbrain to the cervicomedullary junction (Fig. 20.1). They most frequently occur in children and lack a specific gender predilection. Over the past two decades, we have become increasingly more familiar with their characteristic patient symptom complex, their specific neuroimaging features, and a standardized approach to therapy. That said, there are still a number of challenges that are posed by tumors in this critical region of the neuraxis. As each tumor subtype could be the subject of an independent chapter, here, we will review the main patient presentations, the key neuroimaging features, and the goals of surgical and non-operative therapies for children with brainstem tumors.
2 Midbrain Tumors
2.1 Tectal Gliomas
2.1.1 Clinical Symptoms and Signs
Tectal gliomas are located in close proximity to the Sylvian aqueduct, and as such, they most often cause hydrocephalus from aqueductal obstruction. Accordingly, children will demonstrate clinical evidence of increased intracranial pressure, including papilledema, nausea, vomiting, headache, visual changes, and/or oculomotor deficits. Rarely, patients may also exhibit signs of ataxia, pyramidal tract dysfunction, and/or other cranial nerve palsies including nystagmus, tremor, diplopia, and Parinaud’s syndrome [1].
2.1.2 Diagnostics
MRI is considered the gold standard imaging modality for diagnosis of these tumors. Computed tomography (CT) may often miss these lesions as they are isodense to the surrounding brain. Tectal tumors are best appreciated on T2 and FLAIR MR images in which a classic periaqueductal hyperintensity is seen (Fig. 20.2). In the majority of circumstances, tectal tumors are non-enhancing lesions. However, on occasion, they may be dorsally exophytic, cystic, and quite large (Fig. 20.3).
2.1.3 Staging and Classification
Tectal tumors can be classified into three groups based on MR appearance and subsequent correlation with neuroendoscopic, histopathologic, and postoperative clinical findings. Group 1 tectal tumors appear on MRI typically as a bulbous tectal mass, isodense on T1-weighted images, and hyperdense on T2-weighted images without gadolinium. Group 2 tectal tumors appear similar to Group 1 along with exophytic growth into the Sylvian aqueduct, further extending into the midbrain tegmentum and diencephalon. Group 3 tectal tumors typically appear as large lesions with mixed intensities on T1-weighted and T2-weighted images along with enhancement on gadolinium. These tumors typically exhibit exophytic growth into the Sylvian aqueduct and third ventricle.
2.1.4 Treatment
The preferred management of the majority of children presenting with tectal tumors is endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) to overcome the obstruction of the aqueduct and to permit more physiological cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage [2]. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting may be required, especially in children less than 1 year of age; however, this can be fraught with complications related to overdrainage in the setting of a child with established macrocephaly. After hydrocephalus is controlled, serial MR imaging is recommended on an annual basis for both ETV-treated and VP-shunted patients. ETVs are known to occlude on occasion requiring repeat fenestrations [3]; and VP shunts may block or disconnect in long-term follow-up. Direct surgical resection of the typical tectal tumor should not be performed. Atypical tectal tumors demonstrating serial growth and enhancement may require a neurosurgical approach, typically an infratentorial supracerebellar, or occipital transtentorial approach. On occasion, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or chemotherapy may be indicated for some of these latter types of tectal tumors.
2.1.5 Prognosis/Quality of Life
Children with tectal tumors whose hydrocephalus is well controlled can lead normal lives without significant cognitive or neurodevelopmental issues. The prognosis is typically excellent, although lifelong monitoring of hydrocephalus may be required.
2.2 Tegmental Tumors
2.2.1 Clinical Symptoms and Signs
Tegmental tumors are focal midbrain tumors that typically arise in children less than 14 years of age. They cause symptoms by virtue of their mass effect on the unilateral tegmentum and corticospinal tract causing hemiparesis, oculomotor nerve palsy, and ataxia [4]. In most cases, symptoms can be traced back 6–12 months prior to diagnosis. Occasionally, unilateral tremor is seen, especially in those tumors where extension into the basal ganglia and thalamus are also noted.
2.2.2 Diagnostics
The imaging modality of choice is MRI. Tegmental tumors are typically homogeneously enhancing lesions upon the administration of gadolinium (Fig. 20.4). They can be quite large occupying the entire tegmentum and can cause hydrocephalus by virtue of occlusion of the foramina of Monro.
2.2.3 Staging and Classification
There is no uniform staging or classification system for midbrain tegmental tumors. Rather, it is known that these lesions may extend from the tegmentum to involve the thalamus and are sometimes called “thalamopeduncular” lesions [5].
2.2.4 Treatment
Focal tegmental tumors present formidable challenges to the neurosurgeon in terms of approach and long-term management. The majority of lesions are low-grade gliomas. Biopsy can be performed, either framed based or frameless. Options for surgical approaches include trans-Sylvian, transtemporal, or transcallosal depending on the size of the tumor and its presentation to the pial or ventricular surfaces (Fig. 20.5) [5, 6]. Optimal neurosurgical resection is aided through the use of neuronavigation particularly with diffusion tensor imaging sequences on MR, intraoperative neuronavigation, and intraoperative MRI scanning [7] (Fig. 20.6). The goal of surgery is to achieve a gross total resection of the tumor. Where this is not possible, then a trial of chemotherapy using specific midline low-grade glioma drug therapy becomes possible [6]. At times the BRAF gene may be mutated or fused in low-grade astrocytomas, and this molecular finding offers an opportunity for targeted drug therapy [8]. However, standard low-grade glioma chemotherapy in children is also an option and works well in many instances [8]. If neurosurgical resection and chemotherapy are not sufficient, then intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) can be delivered.
2.2.5 Quality of Life/Prognosis
Children with focal midbrain tumors can do extremely well after aggressive neurosurgical resection of their tumors. If there is residual tumor after surgery and demonstrated regrowth, then several options exist for targeted chemotherapy, conventional chemotherapy, or radiation therapy in older children. With maximum safe surgery, most children with focal midbrain tumors can lead normal lives. By virtue of the potential for recurrence, serial MR imaging is highly recommended. Overall, the prognosis is good for children with focal midbrain tumors with 90% or higher survival rates at 5 years [5].
3 Pontine Tumors
Tumors of the pons in children will typically be gliomas of varying grade malignancy. They can be divided into diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), dorsally exophytic, or focal pontine tumors, based primarily on the neuroradiological findings. Here we will cover DIPG and dorsally exophytic pontine gliomas.
3.1 Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma (DIPG)
DIPGs comprise approximately 70% of all brainstem tumors making them the most common form of brainstem tumor. Typically these lesions are high-grade neoplasms, and overall survival is very poor with most children succumbing within 2 years of diagnosis despite all forms of therapy [9]. There is equal sex incidence of DIPGs, and most children are between ages 5 and 10 at time of diagnosis. Interestingly, the molecular genetics of DIPG in childhood are now rather well worked out with novel genetic pathways being identified as drivers of this tumor including ACVR1, H3K27M, PDGB, and several others [10, 11] (Fig. 20.7).
3.1.1 Clinical Symptoms and Signs
There is often a rapid appearance of clinical findings including cranial nerve deficits (e.g., facial nerve palsy, VIth nerve palsy causing diplopia), long tract signs, and ataxia. Hydrocephalus may form causing headaches and a syndrome of raised intracranial pressure, but this is usually a late presenting feature in the course of the disease [9].
3.1.2 Diagnostics
The diagnosis of DIPG is most often made by MRI. Frequently, there is diffuse enlargement of the pons occupying 50–75% or more of this region of the brainstem. There may be exophytic components, especially ventrally. Contrast enhancement may exist but is usually patchy and contained within the diffuse swelling of the pons. At times, the basilar artery may be totally engulfed by tumor (Fig. 20.8). Other MR sequences and techniques have been used for DIPG, including MR spectroscopy (MRS) showing lower mean total choline concentration and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), but these have not proven reliable in predicting neuropathology of the lesions or outcome.
3.1.3 Staging/Classification
There is no generally accepted staging system for children with DIPG. With disease progression, there may be metastases through leptomeningeal seeding to other regions of the brain or to the spinal axis.
3.1.4 Treatment
There is no role for direct surgery for the vast majority of children with DIPGs. In addition, for many years, the common practice was not to offer biopsy of DIPGs in children with typically appearing tumors on MRI. Children with a DIPG diagnosis on MRI would move quickly to radiation therapy protocols including the use of IMRT or hyperfractionated radiation therapy [9]. A number of clinical trials have now been performed assessing the role of chemotherapy in DIPG [12, 13]. Chemotherapeutics such as vincristine, CCNU, prednisone, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and tamoxifen have all been tried but with limited to no effect.
With the recognition that some DIPGs may have atypical features (e.g., child older than 10 years, lateral enhancing tumor with less than 50% brainstem involvement), some centers are now offering stereotactic biopsies for these patients [14, 15]. Stereotactic biopsy can be performed safely, and in groups where molecular genetics can be performed on fresh tumor specimens, there are reasonable expectations of finding new or targetable genetic lesions [16].
Some innovative clinical trials are now being performed on children with DIPG. Souweidane and colleagues have recently published their findings on the use of convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of a radioimmunotherapy agent targeting the glioma-associated B7-H3 antigen, along with a number of other targeted agents, to treat children with DIPG [17,18,19,20]. They have shown that the use of CED in children who have already received radiation therapy is both safe and potentially efficacious [17]. In addition, some recent interesting studies have been done with immunotherapy. Benitez-Ribas et al. treated children with DIPG with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with an allogeneic tumoral cell line lysate. They showed that this protocol leads to a definitive immune-generated response and may serve as a promising backbone for future therapy [21]. We have recently shown that the use of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) can increase the delivery of chemotherapeutics, specifically doxorubicin, to the brainstem in experimental models [22].
3.1.5 Prognosis/Quality of Life
The prognosis of children with DIPG remains poor despite intensive therapies. DIPGs remain highly chemo- and radio-resistant neoplasms. Children normally remain in remission for 6–8 months following the completion of radiation therapy. However, there are some harbingers of a poor prognosis, and these include age less than 2 years at tie of diagnosis, multiple cranial nerve palsies, and rapid onset of symptoms prior to diagnosis.
At times, quality of life is made possible only through the continued use of corticosteroids; however, these should be limited so that children do not suffer some of the feared side effects of these agents. Palliative care approaches should be offered at the time of clear tumor progression after all forms of therapy have been offered and have failed.
3.2 Dorsally Exophytic Pontine Gliomas
3.2.1 Symptoms and Clinical Signs
Dorsally exophytic pontine gliomas comprise roughly 20% of pediatric brainstem gliomas. They tend to present insidiously, with patients reporting minor symptoms over a 6–12-month time period. Some of the typical symptoms include headaches and vomiting; and ataxia, abducens or facial nerve palsies, and torticollis are some of the typical neurological signs [23].
3.2.2 Diagnostics
CT scans may still be used as a quick screening tool. On CT, these lesions are typically hypodense and fill the fourth ventricle. Bright contrast enhancement may be evident as well (Fig. 20.9). MRI has become the standard assessment tool used for children with dorsally exophytic brainstem gliomas. On MRI, a cap of surrounding CSF may be seen dorsolaterally. Ventrally, the tumor will blend into the brainstem, and it is frequently difficult to ascertain where the tumor ends and where the functional components of the brainstem begin. Signal characteristics are of low signal on T1 with high signal on T2 sequences. The tumor edges will generally be consistent between T1 and T2 sequences as compared to diffuse intrinsic lesions where there usually is a larger area of T2 signal abnormality compared to T1. As with CT, there is usually bright enhancement following intravenous contrast administration (Fig. 20.10).
3.2.3 Staging and Classification
Dorsally exophytic gliomas are predominantly pilocytic astrocytomas, with rare occurrence of anaplastic, higher-grade lesions, or gangliogliomas. The most consistent area of growth is through the path of least resistance, through the ependyma of the fourth ventricle. These lesions are locally recurrent and rarely show signs of distant dissemination or metastasis.
3.2.4 Treatment
Due to modern advances in operative technology and neuroimaging, the majority of dorsally exophytic brainstem gliomas are quite amenable to surgical resection. Whereas these lesions were thought to be inoperable, today dorsally exophytic brainstem gliomas can be approached quite aggressively due to the advent of microneurosurgical techniques, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), and neuronavigation [7, 24, 25]. Following exposure of the dorsally exophytic mass lesion in the fourth ventricle following standard suboccipital craniotomy and dural opening, tumor is removed stepwise using the ultrasonic aspirator (CUSA), suction, and bipolar cautery (Fig. 20.11). Intraoperative ultrasound is a useful adjunct as well in judging extent of resection, as is intraoperative MRI. Care must be taken not to resect tumor below the estimated plane of the floor of the fourth ventricle. Decisions on where and when to stop neurosurgical resection are aided by feedback from IONM. Postoperative morbidity is usually noted in the form of exacerbation of existing preoperative ataxia, dysmetria, nystagmus, and cranial nerve dysfunction.
Radiation therapy may be required for those tumors that have recurred and where further neurosurgical options are limited. Typically, 54 Gy delivered in 30 fractions over 6 weeks is given. Tumor control after radiation therapy has been described as generally favorable in many series [23].
These days, with the known biological targeting of low-grade gliomas in children, dorsally exophytic pontine gliomas may be amenable to chemotherapy. In the past, carboplatin and vincristine have been used. Now, with various BRAF mutations and fusion anomalies discovered, BRAF inhibitor therapy is being explored at this time [26,27,28].
3.2.5 Prognosis/Quality of Life
Overall 5-year survival for the dorsally exophytic pilocytic lesions is good, with rates in most studies of about 95% [23]. Recurrence is recognized even with gross total excision, such that progression-free survival rates at 5 years are between 54 and 72% [23]. Other factors that worsen survival are cranial nerve (particularly abducens) dysfunction at presentation and symptom duration of less than 6 months. Total or subtotal excision of low-grade brainstem lesions has been shown to have an improved outcome compared to partial (<50% of total tumor mass) excision. Long-term neurological function following surgery for dorsally exophytic lesions is generally good, with most patients being either at their presentation baseline or improved.
Although the outcome for the dorsally exophytic pilocytic gliomas is good, the rarer fibrillary gliomas may carry a very poor prognosis. Various novel modalities of treatment are being investigated, including convection-enhanced and slow-flow delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, radiosensitizing agents, gene therapy, and hyperbaric and interstitial radiotherapy. Ultimately, a deeper understanding of the molecular biology of these tumors will lead to improvements in treatment with targeted therapies.
3.3 Cervicomedullary Gliomas
3.3.1 Symptoms and Clinical Signs
Cervicomedullary gliomas (CMGs) are intramedullary tumors that develop around the craniovertebral junction. They are rare, slow-growing, and histologically benign tumors that typically present with a variety of neurological symptoms including those of lower brainstem dysfunction and those of myelopathy [29]. Patients with tumors located in the medulla typically develop nausea, vomiting, failure to thrive, lower cranial nerve dysfunction, chronic aspiration, sleep apnea, and obstructive hydrocephalus. Tumors located in the upper cervical spine lead to changes in hand preference, gait, and motor regression especially in younger patients. They can also lead to hypo-/hyperreflexia and facial pain. However, independent of anatomical origin, as the tumor expands, patients have a mixture of these signs and symptoms.
3.3.2 Diagnostics
Regardless of location, CMGs present with clinical, radiologic, and pathological similarities. MRI is used as an initial diagnostic tool, and tissue diagnosis at the time of surgery leads to the final pathology. On MRI, the majority of CMGs are hypointense to white matter. On T2 and proton density images, they are hyperintense to white matter (Fig. 20.12). On sagittal MRI, CMGs extend from the caudal two thirds of the medulla to the rostral aspect of the cervical cord. They tend to enhance avidly following contrast administration.
CMGs are typically low-grade neoplasms and may be gliomas or gangliogliomas [30]. Occasionally, anaplastic changes may be found in these tumors [29].
3.3.3 Classification
There is no standard classification system of CMGs. Since most of these tumors are low-grade, they are inclined to grow circumferentially around pial structures and become redirected at white matter tract interfaces. Thus, the pyramidal decussating fibers and medial lemniscus restrict their spread into the pontomedullary junction and instead direct their growth in the direction of the fourth ventricle. This growth restriction can subsequently lead to well-defined tumor borders and thus easier resection for the surgeon.
3.3.4 Treatment
Though conventional treatment for these tumors is by means of surgical resection, there has been a great amount of discussion on the role of radiation and chemotherapy as adjuncts to surgery. The role of surgery is indispensable as it allows the diagnosis to be made via tissue biopsy and decompression of the brainstem and cervical spine, along with treating an associated syrinx or potentially. However, complete resection is often not possible due to poorly defined tumor borders and/or unacceptable risk of neurological deficit. Valuable tools such as ultrasound, intraoperative MRI, stereotaxy, and neurophysiological monitoring are available for achieving maximal resection [7, 24, 25] (Fig. 20.13).
As previously stated, surgery may not be curative in some instances for low-grade lesions and is never curative with high-grade lesions. Radiation therapy (RT) is considered an optional treatment modality for CMGs. It can be used as primary treatment or salvage treatment for low-grade lesions and can be considered in tandem with chemotherapy for primary treatment of malignant tumors not amenable to surgical resection. A more conservative surgical approach may be indicated for CMGs that demonstrate enhancing tumor tissue among non-enhancing tissue that is continuous with normal cervical spinal cord and/or medulla and/or a poorly delineated tumor/brainstem interface with an abnormal T1 signal extending beyond the apparent tumor into the brainstem on MRI. When these are present on MRI, it is proposed that chemotherapy and/or RT may be superior treatment modalities and provide better survival and neurological outcomes. Chemotherapy alone is typically not considered a standard therapeutic modality but an adjuvant treatment modality in conjunction with surgery and/or salvage treatment for recurrent or progressive tumor [29].
Interestingly, there is a tremendous research focus on the development of novel, targeted therapies based on the specific molecular signature of these tumors. Key tumor molecular markers/pathways have been elucidated, including activation of the ERK/MAPK pathway and identification of KIAA1549-BRAF gene fusions with high frequency [8, 26, 27, 31, 32]. Certain subsets of CMGs are also known to express BRAFV600E mutations. The ERK/MAPK pathway presents a potent area of targeted therapy by MEK inhibitors, which provides a potential alternative treatment modality for patients who are unable to receive maximal resection or do not desire it. Thus, there is tremendous potential for the development of effective targeted therapies as future treatments for CMGs.
3.3.5 Prognosis/Quality of Life
CMGs are typically low-grade lesions and thus have favorable overall survival. However, their recurrence rate is high, and they require long-term follow-up to maximize overall survival and neurological preservation. In essence, these tumors take patients down a chronic illness pathway that leads to stepwise deterioration. The goal, of course, is to maximize tumor resection, minimize long-term neurological morbidity, and improve overall quality of life over time.
Interestingly, it has been shown that patients with protracted duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis generally have low-grade tumors with a high probability of long overall survival.
Finally, postoperative cervical sagittal deformity has been reported as a major risk for children undergoing surgery for an intramedullary spinal cord tumor, and this also includes CMGs. At times, instrumented occipito-cervical fusion procedures may be required.
4 Conclusions
Brainstem tumors in children are a relatively rare but extremely important subset of brain tumors in children. Their diagnosis is now made fairly accurately on the basis of preoperative MRI scanning which helps apportion these tumors into subgroups affecting the midbrain, pons, and cervicomedullary regions. Despite their critical location, brainstem tumors can now be approached successfully and safely through a number of strategies that have been outlined in this chapter. Tremendous progress has been made in our characterization of the main genetic and epigenetic alterations that affect DIPGs, gangliogliomas, and low-grade gliomas. As a result, there is hope on the horizon that targeted therapy toward activated pathways in these tumors (e.g., BRAF, MAPK, H3KM27, and PDGFB) may provide an additional arm of therapy that will help substantially in improving overall survival and minimizing morbidity in children afflicted with these tumors. In addition, novel drug delivery approaches, such as CED or MRgFUS, should facilitate increased concentrations of targeted therapy into recalcitrant lesions such as DIPG. It is hoped that these approaches will be met with increasing survival advantages among children with these devastating brainstem lesions in particular.
References
Igboechi C, Vaddiparti A, Sorenson EP, Rozzelle CJ, Tubbs RS, Loukas M (2013) Tectal plate gliomas: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 29:1827–1833
Diaz RJ, Girgis FM, Hamiltonn MG (2014) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus due to tectal glioma. Can J Neurol Sci 41:476–481
Chumas PD, Drake JM, Del Bigio MR (1992) Death from chronic tonsillar herniation in a patient with lumboperitoneal shunt and Crouzon’s disease. Br J Neurosurg 6:595–599
Vandertop WP, Hoffman HJ, Drake JM, Humphreys RP, Rutka JT, Amstrong DC, Becker LE (1992) Focal midbrain tumors in children. Neurosurgery 31:186–194
Broadway SJ, Ogg RJ, Scoggins MA, Sanford R, Patay Z, Boop FA (2011) Surgical management of tumors producing the thalamopeduncular syndrome of childhood. J Neurosurg Pediatr 7:589–595
Lee RP, Foster KA, Lillard JC, Klimo P Jr, Ellison DW, Orr B, Boop FA (2017) Surgical and molecular considerations in the treatment of pediatric thalamopeduncular tumors. J Neurosurg Pediatr 20:247–255
Ng WH, Mukhida K, Rutka JT (2010) Image guidance and neuromonitoring in neurosurgery. Childs Nerv Syst 26:491–502
Packer RJ, Pfister S, Bouffet E, Avery R, Bandopadhayay P, Bornhorst M, Bowers DC, Ellison D, Fangusaro J, Foreman N, Fouladi M, Gajjar A, Haas-Kogan D, Hawkins C, Ho CY, Hwang E, Jabado N, Kilburn LB, Lassaletta A, Ligon KL, Massimino M, Meeteren SV, Mueller S, Nicolaides T, Perilongo G, Tabori U, Vezina G, Warren K, Witt O, Zhu Y, Jones DT, Kieran M (2017) Pediatric low-grade gliomas: implications of the biologic era. Neuro Oncol 19:750–761
Mathew RK, Rutka JT (2018) Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: clinical features, molecular genetics, and novel targeted therapeutics. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61:343–351
Buczkowicz P, Hoeman C, Rakopoulos P, Pajovic S, Letourneau L, Dzamba M, Morrison A, Lewis P, Bouffet E, Bartels U, Zuccaro J, Agnihotri S, Ryall S, Barszczyk M, Chornenkyy Y, Bourgey M, Bourque G, Montpetit A, Cordero F, Castelo-Branco P, Mangerel J, Tabori U, Ho KC, Huang A, Taylor KR, Mackay A, Bendel AE, Nazarian J, Fangusaro JR, Karajannis MA, Zagzag D, Foreman NK, Donson A, Hegert JV, Smith A, Chan J, Lafay-Cousin L, Dunn S, Hukin J, Dunham C, Scheinemann K, Michaud J, Zelcer S, Ramsay D, Cain J, Brennan C, Souweidane MM, Jones C, Allis CD, Brudno M, Becher O, Hawkins C (2014) Genomic analysis of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas identifies three molecular subgroups and recurrent activating ACVR1 mutations. Nat Genet 46:451–456
Fontebasso AM, Papillon-Cavanagh S, Schwartzentruber J, Nikbakht H, Gerges N, Fiset PO, Bechet D, Faury D, De Jay N, Ramkissoon LA, Corcoran A, Jones DT, Sturm D, Johann P, Tomita T, Goldman S, Nagib M, Bendel A, Goumnerova L, Bowers DC, Leonard JR, Rubin JB, Alden T, Browd S, Geyer JR, Leary S, Jallo G, Cohen K, Gupta N, Prados MD, Carret AS, Ellezam B, Crevier L, Klekner A, Bognar L, Hauser P, Garami M, Myseros J, Dong Z, Siegel PM, Malkin H, Ligon AH, Albrecht S, Pfister SM, Ligon KL, Majewski J, Jabado N, Kieran MW (2014) Recurrent somatic mutations in ACVR1 in pediatric midline high-grade astrocytoma. Nat Genet 46:462–466
Hoffman LM, Veldhuijzen van Zanten SEM, Colditz N, Baugh J, Chaney B, Hoffmann M, Lane A, Fuller C, Miles L, Hawkins C, Bartels U, Bouffet E, Goldman S, Leary S, Foreman NK, Packer R, Warren KE, Broniscer A, Kieran MW, Minturn J, Comito M, Broxson E, Shih CS, Khatua S, Chintagumpala M, Carret AS, Escorza NY, Hassall T, Ziegler DS, Gottardo N, Dholaria H, Doughman R, Benesch M, Drissi R, Nazarian J, Jabado N, Boddaert N, Varlet P, Giraud G, Castel D, Puget S, Jones C, Hulleman E, Modena P, Giagnacovo M, Antonelli M, Pietsch T, Gielen GH, Jones DTW, Sturm D, Pfister SM, Gerber NU, Grotzer MA, Pfaff E, von Bueren AO, Hargrave D, Solanki GA, Jadrijevic Cvrlje F, Kaspers GJL, Vandertop WP, Grill J, Bailey S, Biassoni V, Massimino M, Calmon R, Sanchez E, Bison B, Warmuth-Metz M, Leach J, Jones B, van Vuurden DG, Kramm CM, Fouladi M (2018) Clinical, radiologic, pathologic, and molecular characteristics of long-term survivors of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG): a collaborative report from the International and European Society for Pediatric Oncology DIPG registries. J Clin Oncol 36:1963–1972
Truffaux N, Philippe C, Paulsson J, Andreiuolo F, Guerrini-Rousseau L, Cornilleau G, Le Dret L, Richon C, Lacroix L, Puget S, Geoerger B, Vassal G, Ostman A, Grill J (2015) Preclinical evaluation of dasatinib alone and in combination with cabozantinib for the treatment of diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Neuro Oncol 17:953–964
Puget S, Beccaria K, Blauwblomme T, Roujeau T, James S, Grill J, Zerah M, Varlet P, Sainte-Rose C (2015) Biopsy in a series of 130 pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 31:1773–1780
Puget, S., Blauwblomme, T., and Grill, J. (2012) Is biopsy safe in children with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 629–633
Plessier A, Le Dret L, Varlet P, Beccaria K, Lacombe J, Meriaux S, Geffroy F, Fiette L, Flamant P, Chretien F, Blauwblomme T, Puget S, Grill J, Debily MA, Castel D (2017) New in vivo avatars of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) from stereotactic biopsies performed at diagnosis. Oncotarget 8:52543–52559
Souweidane MM, Kramer K, Pandit-Taskar N, Zhou Z, Haque S, Zanzonico P, Carrasquillo JA, Lyashchenko SK, Thakur SB, Donzelli M, Turner RS, Lewis JS, Cheung NV, Larson SM, Dunkel IJ (2018) Convection-enhanced delivery for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma: a single-centre, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial. Lancet Oncol 19:1040–1050
Zhou Z, Singh R, Souweidane MM (2017) Convection-enhanced delivery for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma treatment. Curr Neuropharmacol 15:116–128
Luther N, Zhou Z, Zanzonico P, Cheung NK, Humm J, Edgar MA, Souweidane MM (2014) The potential of theragnostic (1)(2)(4)I-8H9 convection-enhanced delivery in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Neuro Oncol 16:800–806
Zhou Z, Luther N, Ibrahim GM, Hawkins C, Vibhakar R, Handler MH, Souweidane MM (2013) B7-H3, a potential therapeutic target, is expressed in diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. J Neurooncol 111:257–264
Benitez-Ribas D, Cabezon R, Florez-Grau G, Molero MC, Puerta P, Guillen A, Paco S, Carcaboso AM, Santa-Maria Lopez V, Cruz O, de Torres C, Salvador N, Juan M, Mora J, La Madrid AM (2018) Immune response generated with the administration of autologous dendritic cells pulsed with an allogenic tumoral cell-lines lysate in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Front Oncol 8:127
Alli S, Figueiredo CA, Golbourn B, Sabha N, Wu MY, Bondoc A, Luck A, Coluccia D, Maslink C, Smith C, Wurdak H, Hynynen K, O’Reilly M, Rutka JT (2018) Brainstem blood brain barrier disruption using focused ultrasound: a demonstration of feasibility and enhanced doxorubicin delivery. J Control Release 281:29–41
Pollack IF, Hoffman HJ, Humphreys RP, Becker L (1993) The long-term outcome after surgical treatment of dorsally exophytic brain-stem gliomas. J Neurosurg 78:859–863
Stone SS, Rutka JT (2008) Utility of neuronavigation and neuromonitoring in epilepsy surgery. Neurosurg Focus 25:E17
Timoney N, Rutka JT (2017) Recent advances in epilepsy surgery and achieving best outcomes using high-frequency oscillations, diffusion tensor imaging, magnetoencephalography, intraoperative neuromonitoring, focal cortical dysplasia, and bottom of sulcus dysplasia. Neurosurgery 64:1–10
Green AL, Kieran MW (2015) Pediatric brainstem gliomas: new understanding leads to potential new treatments for two very different tumors. Curr Oncol Rep 17:436
Lassaletta A, Zapotocky M, Mistry M, Ramaswamy V, Honnorat M, Krishnatry R, Guerreiro Stucklin A, Zhukova N, Arnoldo A, Ryall S, Ling C, McKeown T, Loukides J, Cruz O, de Torres C, Ho CY, Packer RJ, Tatevossian R, Qaddoumi I, Harreld JH, Dalton JD, Mulcahy-Levy J, Foreman N, Karajannis MA, Wang S, Snuderl M, Nageswara Rao A, Giannini C, Kieran M, Ligon KL, Garre ML, Nozza P, Mascelli S, Raso A, Mueller S, Nicolaides T, Silva K, Perbet R, Vasiljevic A, Faure Conter C, Frappaz D, Leary S, Crane C, Chan A, Ng HK, Shi ZF, Mao Y, Finch E, Eisenstat D, Wilson B, Carret AS, Hauser P, Sumerauer D, Krskova L, Larouche V, Fleming A, Zelcer S, Jabado N, Rutka JT, Dirks P, Taylor MD, Chen S, Bartels U, Huang A, Ellison DW, Bouffet E, Hawkins C, Tabori U (2017) Therapeutic and prognostic implications of BRAF V600E in pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Clin Oncol 35:2934–2941
Penman CL, Faulkner C, Lowis SP, Kurian KM (2015) Current understanding of BRAF alterations in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic targeting in pediatric low-grade gliomas. Front Oncol 5:54
McAbee JH, Modica J, Thompson CJ, Broniscer A, Orr B, Choudhri AF, Boop FA, Klimo P Jr (2015) Cervicomedullary tumors in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr 16:357–366
Janjua MB, Ivasyk I, Pisapia DJ, Souweidane MM (2017) Ganglioglioma of brain stem and cervicomedullary junction: a 50 years review of literature. J Clin Neurosci 44:34–46
Garcia MA, Solomon DA, Haas-Kogan DA (2016) Exploiting molecular biology for diagnosis and targeted management of pediatric low-grade gliomas. Future Oncol 12:1493–1506
Sturm D, Pfister SM, Jones DTW (2017) Pediatric gliomas: current concepts on diagnosis, biology, and clinical management. J Clin Oncol 35:2370–2377
Acknowledgments
This chapter was made possible through funds provided from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Brainchild, the Wiley Family Foundation, and the Laurie Berman Fund at the Hospital for Sick Children.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Haider, A.S., Drake, J.M., Rutka, J.T. (2019). Brainstem Tumors in Children. In: Tonn, JC., Reardon, D., Rutka, J., Westphal, M. (eds) Oncology of CNS Tumors. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04152-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04152-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-04151-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-04152-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)