Abstract
The mechanical properties of cells and of subcellular components are important to obtain a mechanistic molecular understanding of biological processes. The quantification of mechanical resistance of cells and biomolecules using biophysical methods matured thanks to the development of nanotechnologies such as optical and magnetic tweezers, the biomembrane force probe, and atomic force microscopy (AFM). The quantitative nature of force spectroscopy measurements has converted AFM into a valuable tool in biophysics. Force spectroscopy allows the determination of the forces required to unfold protein domains and to disrupt individual receptor/ligand bonds. Molecular simulations as a computational microscope allow investigation of similar biological processes with an atomistic detail. In this chapter, we first provide a step-by-step protocol of force spectroscopy experiments using AFM, including sample preparation, measurements, and analysis and interpretation of the resulting dynamic force spectrum in terms of available theories. Next, we present the background for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations focusing on steered molecular dynamics (SMD) and the importance of bridging computational tools with experimental techniques.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Egan P et al (2015) The role of mechanics in biological and bio-inspired systems. Nat Commun 6(May):7418–7418
Boehr DD, Nussinov R (2009) The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat Chem Biol 5(11):789–796
Kamm R, Lammerding J, Mofrad M (2010) Cellular nanomechanics. Springer, New York, NY, pp 1171–1200
Zhang X et al (2009) Atomic force microscopy of protein–protein interactions. Springer US, New York, pp 555–570
Wennmalm S, Simon SM (2007) Studying individual events in biology. Annu Rev Biochem 76:419–446
Greenleaf WJ, Woodside MT, Block SM (2007) High-resolution, single-molecule measurements of biomolecular motion. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 36:171–190
Binnig G, Quate C, Gerber C (1986) Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 56:930–933
Barkai E, Jung Y, Silbey R (2004) Theory of single-molecule spectroscopy: beyond the ensemble average. Annu Rev Phys Chem 55(1):457–507
Bustamante C, Macosko JC, Wuite GJ (2000) Grabbing the cat by the tail: manipulating molecules one by one. Nature reviews. Mol Cell Biol 1(2):130–136
Neuman KC, Nagy A (2008) Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy. Nat Methods 5(6):491–505
Eghiaian F et al (2014) High-speed atomic force microscopy: imaging and force spectroscopy. FEBS Lett 588(19):3631–3638
Rico F et al (2013) High-speed force spectroscopy molecular dynamics simulations. Science 342:741–743
Yu H et al (2017) Hidden dynamics in the unfolding of individual bacteriorhodopsin proteins. Science 355(6328):945–950
Oesterhelt F et al (2000) Unfolding pathways of individual bacteriorhodopsins. Science 288(5463):143–146
Florin EL, Moy VT, Gaub HE (1994) Adhesion forces between individual ligand-receptor pairs. Science (New York, N.Y.) 264(5157):415–417
Moy VT, Florin EL, Gaub HE (1994) Intermolecular forces and energies between ligands and receptors. Science 266(5183):257–259
Rief M et al (1997) Reversible unfolding of individual titin immunoglobulin domains by AFM. Science 276(5315):1109–1112
Rief M et al (1997) Single molecule force spectroscopy on polysaccharides by atomic force microscopy. Science 275(5304):1295–1297
Lee GU, Kidwell DA, Colton RJ (1994) Sensing discrete streptavidin-biotin interactions with atomic force microscopy. Langmuir 2(9):354–357
Lee GU, Chrisey LA, Colton RJ (1994) Direct Measurement of the Forces Between Complementary Strands of DNA. Science 266(5186):771–773
Lekka M et al (1999) Elasticity of normal and cancerous human bladder cells studied by scanning force microscopy. Eur Biophys J 28(4):312–316
Wu HW, Kuhn T, Moy VT (1998) Mechanical properties of l929 cells measured by atomic force microscopy: effects of anticytoskeletal drugs and membrane crosslinking. Scanning 20(5):389–397
Zhang X, Wojcikiewicz E, Moy VT (2002) Force spectroscopy of the leukocyte function-associated antigen-1/intercellular adhesion molecule-1 interaction. Biophys J 83(4):2270–2279
Benoit M et al (2000) Discrete interactions in cell adhesion measured by single-molecule force spectroscopy. Nat Cell Biol 2(6):313–317
Rico F (2016) Molecular to cellular mechanics. Insights from atomic force microscopy. Aix-Marseille Université
Hinterdorfer P, Dufrene YF (2006) Detection and localization of single molecular recognition events using atomic force microscopy. Nat Methods 3(5):347–355
Hinterdorfer P et al (1996) Detection and localization of individual antibody-antigen recognition events by atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(8):3477–3481
Sulchek TA et al (2005) Dynamic force spectroscopy of parallel individual Mucin1-antibody bonds. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102(46):16638–16643
Ott W et al (2017) Single-molecule force spectroscopy on polyproteins and receptor-ligand complexes: the current toolbox. J Struct Biol 197(1):3–12
Putman CAJ et al (1992) A detailed analysis of the optical beam deflection technique for use in atomic force microscopy. J Appl Phys 72(1):6–12
Proksch R et al (2004) Finite optical spot size and position corrections in thermal spring constant calibration. Nanotechnology 15(9):1344–1350
Hansma PK et al (1994) A new, optical-lever based atomic force microscope. J Appl Phys 76(2):796–799
Ohler B (2007) Cantilever spring constant calibration using laser Doppler vibrometry. Rev Sci Instrum 78(6):063701
Ohler B (2007) Practical advice on the determination of cantilever spring constants. Spring AN94:1–12
Hutter JL, Bechhoefer J (1993) Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev Sci Instrum 64(7):1868–1873
Butt HJ, Jaschke M (1995) Calculation of thermal noise in atomic force microscopy. Nanotechnology 6:1–7
Pirzer T, Hugel T (2009) Atomic force microscopy spring constant determination in viscous liquids. Rev Sci Instrum 80(3):035110–035116
Higgins MJ et al (2006) Noninvasive determination of optical lever sensitivity in atomic force microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum 77(1):1–5
Stark RW, Drobek T, Heckl WM (2001) Thermomechanical noise of a free v-shaped cantilever for atomic-force microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 86(1–2):207–215
Sader JE, Chon JWM, Mulvaney P (1999) Calibration of rectangular atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum 70(10):3967–3969
Sader JE et al (2012) Spring constant calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers of arbitrary shape. Rev Sci Instrum 83(10):103705
Sader JE, Lu J, Mulvaney P (2014) Effect of cantilever geometry on the optical lever sensitivities and thermal noise method of the atomic force microscope. Rev Sci Instrum 85(11):6–11
Sader JE et al (2016) A virtual instrument to standardise the calibration of atomic force microscope cantilevers. Rev Sci Instrum 87(9):093711
Heim LO, Kappl M, Butt HJ (2004) Tilt of atomic force microscope cantilevers: effect on spring constant and adhesion measurements. Langmuir 20(7):2760–2764
Hutter JL (2005) Comment on tilt of atomic force microscope cantilevers: effect on spring constant and adhesion measurements. Langmuir 21(6):2630–2632
Rigato A et al (2017) High-frequency microrheology reveals cytoskeleton dynamics in living cells. Nat Phys 13:771
Dudko OK, Hummer G, Szabo A (2006) Intrinsic rates and activation free energies from single-molecule pulling experiments. Phys Rev Lett 96(10):108101
Dudko OK, Hummer G, Szabo A (2008) Theory, analysis, and interpretation of single-molecule force spectroscopy experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(41):15755–15760
Sturm S, Bullerjahn JT, Kroy K (2014) Intramolecular relaxation in dynamic force spectroscopy. Eur Phys J Spec Top 223(14):3129–3144
Friddle RW (2012) Theoretical models in force spectroscopy, Dynamic force spectroscopy and biomolecular recognition. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Noy A, Friddle RW (2013) Practical single molecule force spectroscopy: how to determine fundamental thermodynamic parameters of intermolecular bonds with an atomic force microscope. Methods 60(2):142–150
Kramers HA (1940) Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica 7(4):284–304
Hanggi P, Talkner P, Borkovec M (1990) Reaction-rate theory—50 years after Kramers. Rev Mod Phys 62(2):251–341
Merkel R et al (1999) Energy landscapes of receptor-ligand bonds explored with dynamic force spectroscopy. Nature 397(January):50–53
Friddle RW (2008) Unified model of dynamic forced barrier crossing in single molecules. Phys Rev Lett 100(13):138302
Hummer G, Szabo A (2003) Kinetics from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments. Biophys J 85(1):5–15
McCammon JA, Gelin BR, Karplus M (1977) Dynamics of folded proteins. Nature 267(5612):585–590
Pfaendtner J, Bonomi M (2015) Efficient sampling of high-dimensional free-energy landscapes with parallel bias metadynamics. J Chem Theory Comput 11(11):5062–5067
Leach AR (2001) Molecular modelling: principles and applications, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Verlet L (1967) Computer “experiments” on classical fluids. I. Thermodynamical properties of Lennard-Jones molecules. Phys Rev 159(1):98–103
Hockney RW (1970) The potential calculation and some applications (Potential calculation from given source distribution, including direct and iterative methods, error analysis). Meth Comput Phys 9:136–211
Swope WC et al (1982) A computer simulation method for the calculation of equilibrium constants for the formation of physical clusters of molecules: application to small water clusters. J Chem Phys 76(1):637–649
Beeman D (1976) Some multistep methods for use in molecular dynamics calculations. J Comput Phys 20(2):130–139
Karplus M, Petsko GA (1990) Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature 347(6294):631–639
Daggett V, Levitt M (1993) Realistic simulations of native-protein dynamics in solution and beyond. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 22:353–380
Mackerell AD et al (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102(97):3586–3616
Sotomayor M, Schulten K (2007) Single-molecule experiments in vitro and in silico. Science (New York, N.Y.) 316(5828):1144–1148
Adcock SA, McCammon JA (2006) Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev 106(February):1589–1615
Cornell WD et al (1996) A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules. J Am Chem Soc 118(9):2309–2309
Oostenbrink C et al (2004) A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem 25(13):1656–1676
Jorgensen WL, Maxwell DS, Tirado-Rives J (1996) Development and testing of the OPLS all-atom force field on conformational energetics and properties of organic liquids. J Am Chem Soc 118(45):11225–11236
Sun H (1998) COMPASS: an ab initio force-field optimized for condensed-phase applications overview with details on alkane and benzene compounds. J Phys Chem B 5647(98):7338–7364
González MA (2011) Force fields and molecular dynamics simulations. Collect SFN 12:169–200
Pearlman DA et al (1995) AMBER, a computer program for applying molecular mechanics, normal mode analysis, molecular dynamics and free energy calculations to elucidate the structures and energies of molecules. Comput Phys Commun 91:1–41
Brooks BR et al (1983) CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J Comput Chem 4(2):187–217
Berendsen HJC, van der Spoel D, van Drunen R (1995) GROMACS: a message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput Phys Commun 91(1–3):43–56
Lindahl E, Hess B, Van der Spoel D (2001) GROMACS 3.0: a package for molecular simulation and trajectory analysis. J Mol Model 7:306–317
Phillips JC et al (2005) Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD. J Comput Chem 26(16):1781–1802
Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14(1):33–38
Ribeiro JV et al (2016) QwikMD—integrative molecular dynamics toolkit for novices and experts. Sci Rep 6(May):26536–26536
Isralewitz B, Gao M, Schulten K (2001) Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 11(2):224–230
Grubmüller H (2005) Force probe molecular dynamics simulations. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, N.J.) 305(1):493–515
Grater F et al (2005) Mechanically induced titin kinase activation studied by force-probe molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys J 88(2):790–804
Rief M, Grubmuller H (2002) Force spectroscopy of single biomolecules. ChemPhysChem 3(3):255–261
Grubmuller H, Heymann B, Tavan P (1996) Ligand binding: molecular mechanics calculation of the streptavidin biotin rupture force. Science 271(5251):997–999
Lee EH et al (2009) Discovery through the computational microscope. Structure 17(10):1295–1306
Lu H, Schulten K (2000) The key event in force-induced unfolding of Titin’s immunoglobulin domains. Biophys J 79(1):51–65
Izrailev S et al (1997) Molecular dynamics study of unbinding of the avidin-biotin complex. Biophys J 72(4):1568–1581
Franca EF, Amarante AM, Leite FL (2010) Introduction to atomic force microscopy simulation. In: Microscopy: science, technology, applications and education. Formatex, Spain, pp 1338–1349
Ludemann SK, Lounnas V, Wade RC (2000) How do substrates enter and products exit the buried active site of cytochrome P450cam? 1. Random expulsion molecular dynamics investigation of ligand access channels and mechanisms. J Mol Biol 303(5):797–811
Kosztin D, Izrailev S, Schulten K (1999) Unbinding of retinoic acid from its receptor studied by steered molecular dynamics. Biophys J 76(1 Pt 1):188–197
Izrailev S et al (1999) Steered molecular dynamics. Computational molecular dynamics: challenges, methods, ideas SE-2, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–65
Jarzynski C (1997) Nonequilibrium equality for free energy differences. Phys Rev Lett 78(14):2690–2693
Jarzynski C (1997) Equilibrium free-energy differences from nonequilibrium measurements: a master-equation approach. Phys Rev E 56(5):5018–5035
Gao M et al (2006) Molecular mechanisms of cellular mechanics. Phys Chem Chem Phys 8(32):3692–3706
Hummer G, Szabo A (2001) Free energy reconstruction from nonequilibrium single-molecule pulling experiments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98(7):3658–3661
Balsera M et al (1997) Reconstructing potential energy functions from simulated force-induced unbinding processes. Biophys J 73(3):1281–1287
Gullingsrud J, Braun R, Schulten K (1999) Reconstructing potentials of mean force through time series analysis of steered molecular dynamics simulations. J Comput Phys 151:190–211
Park S et al (2003) Free energy calculation from steered molecular dynamics simulations using Jarzynski’s equality. J Chem Phys 119(6):3559–3566
Sotomayor M (2015) Computational exploration of single-protein mechanics by steered molecular dynamics. AIP Conf Proc 1703:030001
Zhmurov A et al (2010) SOP-GPU: accelerating biomolecular simulations in the centisecond timescale using graphics processors. Proteins Struct Funct Bioinf 78(14):2984–2999
Kmiecik S et al (2014) Coarse-grained modeling of protein dynamics. Comput Methods Study Struct Dyn Biomol 1:55–79
Celik E, Moy VT (2012) Nonspecific interactions in AFM force spectroscopy measurements. J Mol Recognit 25(1):53–56
Kuhn M et al (2005) Automated alignment and pattern recognition of single-molecule force spectroscopy data. J Microsc 218(2):125–132
Puchner EM et al (2008) Comparing proteins by their unfolding pattern. Biophys J 109(50):426–434
Fuhrmann A et al (2008) Refined procedure of evaluating experimental single-molecule force spectroscopy data. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 77(3):1–10
Bosshart PD, Frederix PLTM, Engel A (2012) Reference-free alignment and sorting of single-molecule force spectroscopy data. Biophys J 102(9):2202–2211
Jobst MA et al (2015) Resolving dual binding conformations of cellulosome cohesin-dockerin complexes using single-molecule force spectroscopy. eLife 4:e10319
Alcaraz J et al (2002) Correction of microrheological measurements of soft samples with atomic force microscopy for the hydrodynamic drag on the cantilever. Langmuir 18(3):716–721
Janovjak HJ, Struckmeier J, Muller DJ (2005) Hydrodynamic effects in fast AFM single-molecule force measurements. Eur Biophys J Biophys Lett 34(1):91–96
Bustamante C et al (1994) Entropic elasticity of lambda-phage DNA. Science (New York, N.Y.) 265:1599–1600
Ortiz C, Hadziioannou G (1999) Entropic elasticity of single polymer chains of poly(methacrylic acid) measured by atomic force microscopy. Macromolecules 32:780–787
Livadaru L, Netz RR, Kreuzer HJ (2003) Stretching response of discrete semiflexible polymers. Macromolecules 36(10):3732–3744
Bell G (1978) Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200(4342):618–627
Evans E, Ritchie K (1997) Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys J 72:1541–1555
Evans E, Ritchie K (1999) Strength of a weak bond connecting flexible polymer chains. Biophys J 76(5):2439–2447
Maitra A, Arya G (2010) Model accounting for the effects of pulling-device stiffness in the analyses of single-molecule force measurements. Phys Rev Lett 104(10):108301
Friddle RW, Noy A, De Yoreo JJ (2012) Interpreting the widespread nonlinear force spectra of intermolecular bonds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(34):13573–13578
Bullerjahn JT, Sturm S, Kroy K (2014) Theory of rapid force spectroscopy. Nat Commun 5:4463
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Sumbul, F., Rico, F. (2019). Single-Molecule Force Spectroscopy: Experiments, Analysis, and Simulations. In: Santos, N., Carvalho, F. (eds) Atomic Force Microscopy. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1886. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8894-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8894-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8893-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8894-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols