Abstract
In Drosophila melanogaster, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) created by exposure to gamma or X-ray radiation can be quantified by immunofluorescent detection of phosphorylated histone H2Av (γ-H2Av) foci in imaginal disc tissues. This technique has been less useful for studying DSBs in imaginal discs exposed to DSB-inducing chemicals, since standard protocols require raising larvae in food treated with liquid chemical suspensions. These protocols typically take 3–4 days to complete and result in heterogeneous responses that do not provide information about the kinetics of DSB formation and repair. Here, we describe a novel and rapid method to quantify DSBs in imaginal discs cultured ex vivo with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) or other DSB-inducing chemicals. The described method requires less than 24 h and provides precise control over MMS concentration and exposure time, enabling reproducible detection of transient DSBs. Furthermore, this technique can be used for nearly any chemical treatment and can be modified and adapted for several different experimental setups and downstream molecular analyses.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ghosal G, Chen J (2013) DNA damage tolerance: a double-edged sword guarding the genome. Trans Cancer Res 2:107–129. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2218-676X.2013.04.01
Branzei D, Foiani M (2010) Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:208–219. doi:10.1038/nrm2852
Lundin C, North M, Erixon K et al (2005) Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 33:3799–3811. doi:10.1093/nar/gki681
Beranek DT (1990) Distribution of methyl and ethyl adducts following alkylation with monofunctional alkylating agents. Mutat Res 231:11–30
Tercero JA, Diffley JF (2001) Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412:553–557. doi:10.1038/35087607
Fu D, Calvo JA, Samson LD (2012) Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents. Nat Rev Cancer 12:104–120. doi:10.1038/nrc3185
Eeken JC, Romeijn RJ, de Jong AW, Pastink A, Lohman PH (2001) Isolation and genetic characterisation of the Drosophila homologue of (SCE)REV3, encoding the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zeta. Mutat Res 485:237–253. doi:10.1016/S0921-8777(01)00062-3
Ravi D, Wiles AM, Bhavani S, Ruan J, Leder P, Bishop AJR (2009) A network of conserved damage survival pathways revealed by a genomic RNAi screen. PLoS Genet 5:e1000527. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000527
Henderson DS, Grigliatti TA (1992) A rapid somatic Genotoxicity assay in Drosophila-Melanogaster using multiple mutant mutagen-sensitive (Mus) strains. Mutagenesis 7:399–405. doi:10.1093/mutage/7.6.399
Cohen SM (1993) Imaginal disc development. In: Bate M, Martinez Arias A (eds) The development of Drosophila melanogaster, vol 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp 747–841
Klein T (2008) Immunolabeling of imaginal discs. Methods Mol Biol 420:253–263. doi:10.1007/978-1-59745-583-1_15
Brodsky MH, Sekelsky JJ, Tsang G et al (2000) mus304 encodes a novel DNA damage checkpoint protein required during Drosophila development. Genes Dev 14:666–678
Bilak A, Uyetake L, TT S (2014) Dying cells protect survivors from radiation-induced cell death in Drosophila. PLoS Genet 10:e1004220. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004220
Wells BS, Johnston LA (2012) Maintenance of imaginal disc plasticity and regenerative potential in Drosophila by p53. Dev Biol 361:263–276. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.10.012
Gatti M, Santini G, Pimpinelli S, Olivieri G (1979) Lack of spontaneous sister chromatid exchanges in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 91:255–274
Madigan JP, Chotkowski HL, Glaser RL (2002) DNA double-strand break-induced phosphorylation of Drosophila histone variant H2Av helps prevent radiation-induced apoptosis. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3698–3705
Adler PN, MacQueen M (1984) Cell proliferation and DNA replication in the imaginal wing disc of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev Biol 103:28–37
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019
Forster B, Van De Ville D, Berent J, Sage D, Unser M (2004) Complex wavelets for extended depth-of-field: a new method for the fusion of multichannel microscopy images. Microsc Res Tech 65:33–42. doi:10.1002/jemt.20092
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Khodaverdian, V.Y., McVey, M. (2017). Rapid Detection of γ-H2Av Foci in Ex Vivo MMS-Treated Drosophila Imaginal Discs. In: Didenko, V. (eds) Fast Detection of DNA Damage. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1644. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7187-9_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7187-9_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-7185-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-7187-9
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols