Abstract
Immunoaffinity enrichment of peptides using anti-peptide antibodies and their subsequent analysis by targeted mass spectrometry using stable isotope-labeled peptide standards is a sensitive and relatively high-throughput assay technology for unmodified and modified peptides in cells, tissues, and biofluids. Suppliers of antibodies and peptides are increasingly aware of this technique and have started incorporating customized quality measures and production protocols to increase the success rate, performance, and supply of the necessary reagents. Over the past decade, analytical biochemists, clinical diagnosticians, antibody experts, and mass spectrometry specialists have shared ideas, instrumentation, reagents, and protocols, to demonstrate that immuno-MRM-MS is reproducible across laboratories. Assay performance is now suitable for verification of candidate biomarkers from large scale discovery “omics” studies, measuring diagnostic proteins in plasma in the clinical laboratory, and for developing a companion assay for preclinical drug studies. Here we illustrate the process for developing these assays with a step-by-step guide for a 20-plex immuno-MRM-MS assay. We emphasize the need for analytical validation of the assay to insure that antibodies, peptides, and mass spectrometer are working as intended, in a multiplexed manner, with suitable assay performance (median values for 20 peptides: CV = 12.4 % at 740 amol/μL, LOD = 310 amol/μL) for applications in quantitative biology and candidate biomarker verification. The assays described conform to Tier 2 (of 3) level of analytical assay validation (1), meaning that the assays are capable of repeatedly measuring sets of analytes of interest within and across samples/experiments and employ internal standards for each analyte for confident detection and precise quantification.
Access provided by CONRICYT – Journals CONACYT. Download protocol PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Key words
- Anti-peptide antibody
- Protein assay
- Peptide assay
- Multiplexed
- Quantification
- Mass spectrometry
- Immunoaffinity enrichment
- Reverse curves
- Plasma
- Biomarkers
- Multiple reaction monitoring
- Selected reaction monitoring
- Parallel reaction monitoring
1 Introduction
Sensitive and selective detection and quantification of peptides using targeted mass spectrometry has become an essential component of verification studies of candidate disease biomarkers and is being increasingly used in biology and clinical diagnostics (1–10 and elsewhere in this book). Historically these mass spectrometry-based peptide assays have been most widely developed and applied using triple quadrupole mass analyzers using a method known as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) (also referred to as selected reaction monitoring, SRM) experiments [11–14], and assays multiplexed up to several hundred analytes are now achievable [15]. In these experiments a subset of sequence-defining fragment ions (usually 3–5) are selected from the precursor peptide and monitored to increase sensitivity and selectivity of analysis [16, 17]. With improvements in the sensitivity and data acquisition speed of mass spectrometers, these assays can now be robustly developed and applied using instruments that acquire full mass spectra at high resolution and mass accuracy, greatly increasing the selectivity and specificity of analysis, a method referred to as parallel reaction monitoring or PRM [18–20]. Adding stable isotope-labeled versions of the analyte peptides as internal standards [21–23], or labeled proteins when available [24, 25] is necessary to insure that the desired analyte is being measured and that the quantification is precise.
MRM assays can now be configured to quantitatively measure peptides and modified peptides from nearly any protein. However, sample complexity and the wide dynamic range of protein abundance in sample matrices like plasma and tissue require additional steps be taken besides assay development to insure detection of analytes that are present at low abundance in biological samples. Several approaches have become standard for plasma analysis, including the use of immunoaffinity depletion columns which remove the 6–60 most abundant proteins thereby facilitating detection of proteins present at lower abundances [26–30]. Fractionating peptide digests of depleted plasma by ion exchange [5, 8, 12] or high pH reversed-phase chromatography [7, 31–33] prior to targeted analysis by MS, a process referred to as fractionMRM (fMRM), reduces sample complexity and enhances sensitivity and specificity of analyte measurement. Combining immunoaffinity depletion with fMRM has resulted in robust, practical methods to quantitatively measure, in high multiplex, peptides from proteins that are present in the high picogram to low nanogram/mL concentration in plasma [5, 12, 15]. Even greater sensitivities can be achieved for small numbers of analytes by taking fMRM to extremes, isolating small numbers of peptides into very small volumes suitable for direct analysis using targeted MS [34].
Antibodies have been used by biologists and clinical laboratories for decades to enrich analytes of interest from biological samples by immunoprecipitation (IP) for detection and quantification [35, 36]. In 2004, Anderson et al. [37] described the use of antibodies raised against proteotypic tryptic peptides to immunoprecipitate analyte peptides from proteolytic digests of plasma. The enriched peptides were subsequently analyzed by LC-MRM-MS and quantified using stable isotope-labeled peptides added to the sample prior to IP and co-enriched with the analyte peptides (Fig. 1). This method was termed SISCAPA for Stable Isotope Standards and Capture by Anti-peptide Antibodies; more recently it has been referred to as immunoaffinity-MRM (iMRM). iMRM provides a one-step enrichment method capable of providing sufficient amounts of analyte peptides for MS analysis from even low abundance proteins. Prior removal of abundant proteins or fractionation at the protein or peptide level is not required [37–42]. Another advantage is that only a single capture Ab is required as the mass spectrometer substitutes for a secondary detection Ab, providing high sequence specificity and readily distinguishing the desired analyte from nonspecifically enriched peptides. The approach works equally well for modified peptides such as phosphopeptides [43], and it can adapted for and combined with capture at the protein level [44, 45]. Immunoaffinity enrichment of peptides requires generation of custom Abs for each peptide target. This can be a relatively lengthy and expensive process especially if the goal is to generate monoclonal Abs that can be distributed to labs throughout the world. However, the success rate for obtaining anti-peptide Abs useful in iMRM assays is substantially higher than for generating IP-competent anti-protein Abs [7, 37, 41, 46]. Highly purified peptide antigens are synthesized with ease and a single rabbit can be immunized in batches of up to five peptide antigens to yield mg quantities of IgG that IP sufficiently well and function in iMRM assays [7, 37, 41, 46]. Throughput can be significantly improved by using Protein G coated magnetic beads and bead-handling robotics to automate peptide capture, wash, and elution steps [38, 46]. iMRM assays can be multiplexed to as high as 50 antibodies in a single sample [6, 7, 41, 47–49]. Interlaboratory studies have shown that iMRM assays are robust and reproducible across laboratories, with detection limits approximating ca. 1 ng of protein per mL of plasma and assay CVs of 15 % or less [49]. The interested reader is directed to the growing body of literature describing configuration and use of iMRM assays for biology, preclinical and clinical measurements [6, 7, 40–50].
There are several distinct steps to the generation, analytical validation, and application of an iMRM assay. First, peptides for use as internal standards and for assay development are selected. This step is informed by what peptides have been previously observed for the proteins of interest. In the absence of experimental data, in silico methods have been developed and can be used. Peptides are examined for uniqueness to the candidate protein as well as to any other protein sequence in the sample to be studied, and nonspecific peptides discarded. When multiple peptides for a protein meet these criteria, those exhibiting the highest MS response, as well as those predicted to have good retention behavior on reversed-phase, are favored. Second, MRM transitions are selected and optimized for the heavy synthetic peptide standards to configure the LC-MRM-MS portion of the assay. Third, anti-peptide antibodies are made and the resulting Abs are evaluated for their ability to capture target peptides in a simplified iMRM assay in a matrix background that suitably mimics the matrix planned for final analysis (e.g. digested plasma for plasma assays, digested tissue from the same source of tissue, similar cell lysate backgrounds, etc). This step identifies which of the 2–5 immunogen peptides developed for each protein is efficiently captured and detected by iMRM, and is therefore suitable for full assay development. In addition, some evidence of how well the endogenous analyte is detected can also be derived at this step [46]. The performance (i.e., linearity, precision, LOD/LOQ) of the antibodies and selected peptides are then systematically evaluated. This is typically done using response curves generated by a method of standard addition in which increasing amounts of light peptide are added to the matrix while keeping the concentration of heavy peptide internal standard constant [51]. Alternatively, in cases where endogenous analyte was found or is expected to be present in the matrix, the heavy peptide may be added over a concentration range and a constant amount of light peptide (either added or endogenous) used as the internal standard. This approach is commonly referred to as “surrogate analyte” [52, 53]. Additional experiments may be used to further define the range and applicability of the iMRM assay, including repeatability, selectivity, stability, and reproducibility of endogenous detection [54]. In addition, experiments may be performed to optimize the amount of antibody per assay and determine the range of multiplexing (quantity of individual antibodies purified against separate peptide antigens used in a single capture) where performance is maintained [48].
Here we describe the generation of a 20-plex iMRM assay and the methods used to assess its performance in the context of a plasma matrix. The methods used are generalizable to smaller or larger multiplexes of Abs and are equally applicable to use in cell lines, tissues, or other biofluids like CSF.
2 Materials
-
1.
Tryptic peptide standards (light versions): Amino acid sequences unique to a single protein (proteotypic) synthesized as free acids with unblocked termini (see Note 1 ), purified by RPLC , verified by MALDI and quantified by AAA. Light peptides are diluted, aliquoted, and formulated in 30 % acetonitrile/0.1 % formic acid at 100 pmol/μL. Refer to sequences and gene names in Table 1.
-
2.
Tryptic peptide standards (heavy versions): Amino acid sequences that match the sequences of the light versions in 2.1 are synthesized with the C-terminal Arg or Lys residue labeled with heavy stable isotopes of carbon (13C) or nitrogen (15N) using 13C6 l-Lysine , 13C6 l- Arginine, or 13C6, 15N4 l-Arginine. The MRM-MS experiments rely on co-elution of the light and heavy versions of the peptides on RP-HPLC. Use of deuterium is not recommended for use in synthesis of heavy-labeled peptides as the isotope effect of deuterium (especially multiple deuterium atoms) can shift the retention time of the heavy versus the light version of the peptide on RP-HPLC. Heavy isotope-labeled peptides are diluted, aliquoted, and formulated identically to the light versions of the peptides as described, above. Refer to sequences and gene names in Table 1 (see Note 2 ).
-
3.
Human plasma: plasma isolated from blood using potassium EDTA (purple tubes) from an individual or a pool of healthy individuals (Bioreclamation—K2EDTA), shipped in 1 mL aliquots and stored at −80 °C (see Note 3 ).
-
4.
Polyclonal antibodies : polyclonal antibodies generated against target tryptic peptide sequences in rabbits (see Note 4 ), quantified by protein assay and formulated in 25 % glycerol/1× PBS/0.1 % sodium azide.
-
5.
Monoclonal antibodies : monoclonal antibodies generated by clonal expansion of the rabbit immune cells isolated from the spleens harvested from the rabbits used in 4 (see Note 5 ), quantified by protein assay and formulated in 25 % glycerol/1× PBS pH 7.4/0.1 % sodium azide.
-
6.
Peptide storage solvent: 30 % acetonitrile/0.1 % formic acid. 300 mL LC-MS grade acetonitrile, 700 mL HPLC grade water, 1 mL formic acid.
-
7.
Antibody storage solution: 25 % glycerol/1× PBS pH 7.4/0.1 % sodium azide. 250 mL Glycerol, 1 packet PBS (Sigma), 1 g sodium azide dissolved into a final volume of 1 L HPLC grade water.
-
8.
Sample diluent/Antibody Elution Solvent: 3 % Acetonitrile/5 % Acetic acid. 3 mL LC-MS grade acetonitrile, 5 mL acetic acid dissolved into a final volume of 100 mL HPLC grade water.
-
9.
Trypsin, TPCK treated (Worthington).
-
10.
TCEP solution: 0.5 M TCEP (BioRad).
-
11.
Desalting Equilibration Solvent: 80 % Acetonitrile (ACN)/0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA). 800 mL of ACN, 1 mL TFA to a final volume of 1 L with HPLC grade water.
-
12.
Desalting Load and Wash Solvent: 0.1 % TFA. Add 1 mL TFA to a final volume of 1 L with HPLC grade water.
-
13.
Desalting Elution Solvent: 45 % ACN/0.1 % TFA. 450 mL of ACN, 1 mL TFA to a final volume of 1 L with HPLC grade water.
-
14.
Antibody wash buffer 1: 1× PBS pH 7.4, 0.03 % CHAPS. 300 mg CHAPS, one packet of PBS (Sigma) dissolved in 1 L HPLC grade water.
-
15.
Antibody wash buffer 2: 0.1× PBS pH 7.4, 0.03 % CHAPS. Add 100 mL of 1× PBS pH 7.4 and 300 mg CHAPS into 900 mL HPLC grade water.
-
16.
Antibody storage buffer: 1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS/0.1 % sodium azide. Dissolve 30 mg CHAPS and 1 g sodium azide in 1 L 1× PBS.
-
17.
Antibody collection buffer: 1× PBS/100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.1/0.03 % CHAPS/0.1 % sodium azide. Dissolve one packet of PBS (Sigma) and 28 g Tris–HCl pH 8.1 crystals (Sigma) 30 mg CHAPS and 1 g sodium azide in 1 L HPLC grade water.
-
18.
Tris HCl solution: 200 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.1: Dissolve 14 g of Tris–HCl pH 8.1 crystals (Sigma) in 500 mL HPLC grade water.
-
19.
1 μm Protein G magnetic beads (Dynal) (NB: the 1 μm beads are no longer commercially available, but 2.8 μm beads are and can be used for the 20-plex level described here. An alternate source (Pierce/Life technologies/Thermo) of 1 μm Protein G magnetic beads may also be used).
-
20.
KingFisher 96 magnetic particle processor (Thermo).
-
21.
KingFisher 250 μL polypropylene 96-well plates (Thermo).
-
22.
Barnstead Thermolyne Lab Quake Shaker (VWR).
-
23.
Polypropylene 96-well hard-shell skirted PCR plates (BioRad).
-
24.
Oasis HLB cartridges (Waters).
3 Methods
The key steps in developing and analytically validating iMRM assays are described below and illustrated in Fig. 1. Detailed descriptions of LC-MRM-MS data collection and analysis of MRM data can be found in references 3, 4, 12–17 and elsewhere in this volume.
3.1 Plasma Digestion and Desalt (Adapted from refs. 13, 49)
-
1.
Remove 3 × 1 mL of plasma from the −80 °C freezer and thaw at ambient temperature (~30 min).
-
2.
Turn on floor mixer incubator and set to 37 °C and rpm to 180. Configure with a 50 mL tube holder if necessary.
-
3.
Add the following to one 50 mL Falcon tube, return any excess plasma to −80 °C freezer: 3 mL plasma, 2.73 g Urea, 1 mL 1 M Tris pH 8.0, 600 μL 0.5 M TCEP.
-
4.
Mix briefly by gentle vortexing and place in incubator at 37 °C and 180 rpm. Once Urea has dissolved, incubate for additional 30 min.
-
5.
Remove from incubator and cool to room temperature.
-
6.
Weigh 462 mg of Iodoacetamide and dissolve in 5 mL 0.2 M Trizma pH 8.1 (500 mM IAA).
-
7.
Add 2 mL of 500 mM IAA into 50 mL tube containing denatured plasma.
-
8.
Mix briefly by gentle vortexing and let stand in the dark at room temperature for 30 min (see Note 6 ).
-
9.
Add 40 mL 0.2 M Trizma pH 8.1. Total volume should be ~48 mL (see Note 7 ).
-
10.
Verify pH ≥ 8.0 by pipetting 5 μL onto a 5–10 pH range pH test strip (EMD).
-
11.
Carefully weigh 3 mg of TPCK-treated trypsin powder into a tared 15 mL Falcon tube (see Note 8 ).
-
12.
Dissolve in 3 mL 0.2 M Trizma pH 8.1 and transfer to digestion mixture.
-
13.
Incubate overnight (12–16 h) at 37 °C at 180 rpm.
-
14.
Add 0.8 mL formic acid. Mix briefly by vortexing and verify pH < 3 by pipetting 5 μL of the digestion mixture onto a 2–5 pH range pH test strip.
-
15.
Store at 4 °C until desalt step.
If desalt is postponed until a later day, freeze digest mixture at −80 °C.
-
16.
Prepare and label 3 × 1 g Oasis cartridges, one for each third of the total digest volume.
-
17.
Install all three cartridges onto the vacuum manifold using pipet tip adaptors.
-
18.
Condition each cartridge using 3 × 20 mL Desalting Equilibration Solvent (80 % ACN/0.1 % TFA).
-
19.
Equilibrate each cartridge using 4 × 20 mL Desalting Wash and Loading Solvent (0.1 % TFA).
-
20.
Add an additional 4 mL Desalting Wash and Loading Solvent (0.1 % TFA) to each cartridge but do not apply vacuum.
-
21.
Divide the total digest volume into three equal volumes and add each third in 4 mL increments onto one of the three Oasis cartridges. Draw vacuum and load additional volume until the entire one-third of the total digest is loaded across the three cartridges.
-
22.
Wash each cartridge using 3 × 20 mL Desalting Wash and Loading Solvent (0.1 % TFA).
-
23.
Elute from each cartridge using into a fresh tube using 2 × 6 mL Desalting Elution Solvent (45 % ACN/0.1 % TFA).
-
24.
Pool the eluates from all three Oasis cartridges into a single 50 mL Falcon tube.
-
25.
Mix briefly by gentle vortexing and dispense an equivalent volume (e.g. 1.5 mL) into ten 2 mL polypropylene tubes (Sarstedt).
Alternatively, the entire volume may be dried by lyophilization into a single tube.
-
26.
Reduce volume in each tube to less than 0.5 mL/tube by rotary evaporation.
-
27.
Add an additional equivalent volume (e.g. 1 mL) into each of the ten 2 mL tubes and dry to less than 0.5 mL by rotary evaporation. Continue until the remaining volume of the Oasis cartridge eluate is equally dispensed across all tubes.
-
28.
Dry each tube completely by rotary evaporation.
-
29.
Store at −80 °C until use.
3.2 Reverse Curve Preparation (Adapted from ref. 57)
-
1.
Thaw peptide stock solutions on wet ice.
-
2.
Combine 5 μL of each light peptide 100 pmol/μL solution into one tube (100 μL). Label as “Light Stock, 5 pmol/μL, 30 % ACN/0.1 % FA.”
-
3.
Combine 5 μL of each heavy peptide 100 pmol/μL solution into one tube (100 μL). Label as “Heavy Stock, 5 pmol/μL, 30 % ACN/0.1 % FA.”
-
4.
Resuspend 1 × 0.3 mL equivalent of digested lyophilized plasma into 270 μL 1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS and 30 μL 1 M Tris pH 8.0. Vortex and mix well for 30 min at RT.
-
5.
Prepare 10 mL of peptide dilution buffer (1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS, 0.2 % digested plasma). Add 20 μL of resuspended digested plasma into 10 mL of 1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS.
-
6.
Prepare 100 fmol/μL light peptide mix: add 10 μL of light peptide stock (5 pmol/μL) into 490 μL peptide dilution buffer (1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS, 0.2 % digested plasma).
-
7.
Prepare Reverse Curve background plasma matrix: Pipet 5685 μL of 1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS pH 7.4 into a 15 mL Falcon tube. Add the resuspended 0.3 mL of digested plasma. Add 15 μL of 100 fmol/μL light peptide mix. Mix briefly by gentle vortexing.
-
8.
Label 1.5 mL polypropylene centrifuge tubes No. 1–8.
-
9.
Add 1045 μL of Reverse Curve Background Matrix to tube 8 and 700 μL into tubes 1–7. Keep tubes on wet ice.
-
10.
Prepare 200 fmol/μL heavy peptide mix: add 20 μL of heavy peptide stock (5 pmol/μL) into 480 μL peptide dilution buffer (1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS, 0.2 % digested plasma).
-
11.
Add 5 μL of 200 fmol/μL heavy peptide mix to tube 8. Mix briefly by gentle vortexing.
-
12.
Transfer 350 μL of tube 8 into tube 7. Mix briefly by gentle vortexing.
-
13.
Continue serial dilution repeating the process in similar manner transferring 350 μL from tube 7 to tube 6, tube 6 to tube 5 down to tube 2 remove 350 μL from tube 2 and discard (tube 1 is blank and contains light peptide only).
-
14.
Freeze in −80 °C until next step (see Note 9 ).
3.3 Crosslinking Antibodies to Protein G Beads (Optional: See Note 10 . Skip to Subheading 3.4 for Procedure Without Crosslinking Antibodies to Beads)
-
1.
Prepare antibody crosslinking solutions:
-
(a)
Antibody equilibration solution: 200 mM triethanolamine (TEA) pH 8.5. Add 10 mL triethanolamine into 400 mL HPLC-grade water. Adjust pH to 8.5 using a target of 2 mL 5 N HCl. Add 1.8 mL of 5 N HCl, mix well and add the remaining 200 μL dropwise until pH is 8.5 (see Note 11 ).
-
(b)
Antibody crosslinking solution: 20 mM Dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) in 200 mM TEA pH 8.5. Dissolve 1.03 g of DMP in 200 mL of Antibody Equilibration Solution.
-
(c)
Antibody quenching solution: 150 mM monoethanolamine (MEA) pH 9.0: Add 3.6 mL monoethanolamine in 400 mL HPLC-grade water. Adjust pH to 9.0 using a target of 7.5 mL 5 N HCl. Add 7.3 mL of 5 N HCl, mix well and add the remaining 200 μL dropwise until pH is 9.0.
-
(d)
Antibody wash solution: 5 % acetic acid/0.03 % CHAPS: Add 50 mL glacial acetic acid and 30 mg of CHAPS into a final volume of 1 L HPLC grade water.
-
(e)
Antibody Storage buffer: 1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS/0.1 % sodium azide. Dissolve 30 mg CHAPS and 1 g sodium azide into a final volume of 1 L 1× PBS.
-
(a)
-
2.
Add 1550 μL magnetic beads to volume containing the 775 μg required for this curve analysis in a 15 mL Falcon tube.
-
3.
Tumble mix or rock mixture gently for 1–2 h at room temperature.
-
4.
Place the magnet next to the tube and allow the beads to collect on the side of the tube, remove and discard supernatant.
-
5.
Resuspend beads in 900 μL Antibody wash buffer 1 (1× PBS pH 7.4/0.03 % CHAPS). Mix briefly by gentle vortexing and store at 4 °C or on wet ice until use.
The following crosslinking steps are performed at room temperature.
-
6.
Place the magnet next to the tube and allow the beads to collect on the side of the tube.
-
7.
Remove and discard supernatant. Add 1 mL Antibody equilibration solution and mix by gentle vortexing for 5 min.
-
8.
Use magnet to collect beads on side of tube. Remove and discard supernatant and repeat equilibration with 1 mL Antibody equilibration solution.
-
9.
Use magnet to collect beads on side of tube. Remove and discard supernatant. Add 1 mL Antibody crosslinking solution and mix by gentle vortexing. Continue tumble mixing for 30 min.
-
10.
Use magnet to collect beads on side of tube. Remove and discard supernatant. Add 1 mL Antibody quenching solution and mix by gentle vortexing for 5 min. Continue tumble mixing for 60 min.
-
11.
Use magnet to collect beads on side of tube. Remove and discard supernatant. Add 1 mL Antibody wash solution and mix by gentle vortexing for 5 min.
-
12.
Use magnet to collect beads on side of tube. Remove and discard supernatant and repeat wash with 1 mL Antibody wash solution.
-
13.
Use magnet to collect beads on side of tube. Remove and discard supernatant.
-
14.
Add 1250 μL of Antibody storage buffer and mix by gentle vortexing. Store at 4 °C until use.
3.4 Antibody Affinity Enrichment (Adapted from ref. 49)
Day One
-
1.
Thaw antibody stock solutions on wet ice.
-
2.
Add 50 μg of each polyclonal antibody and 15 μg of each monoclonal antibody in a labeled 2 mL polypropylene centrifuge tube. Refer to Table 1 for antibody concentrations. Keep tubes on wet ice (see Note 12 ).
-
3.
Bind antibodies to Protein G beads without crosslinking (optional—see Note 10 and Subheading 3.3 for crosslinking antibodies to beads).
-
4.
Add 1550 μL magnetic beads to volume containing the 775 μg required for this curve analysis in a 15 mL Falcon tube.
-
5.
Tumble mix or rock mixture gently for 1–2 h at room temperature.
-
6.
Place the magnet next to the tube and allow the beads to collect on the side of the tube.
-
7.
Remove the supernatant and resuspend the beads in 1250 μL of 1× PBS, 0.03 % CHAPS pH 7.4. Mix briefly by gentle vortexing and store at 4 °C until use.
-
8.
Thaw tubes containing the reverse curves prepared above.
-
9.
Pipet 200 μL of tube 1 (blank sample, no heavy peptide added) into well A1. Pipet two more replicates of 200 μL of tube 1 into wells A2 and A3 of a Thermo 250 μL KF 96-well plate.
-
10.
Repeat in series down the rows, pipetting three replicates of 200 μL of tube 2 into wells B1, B2, and B3 until three replicates of tube 8, which contains the highest concentration of heavy peptide (200 fmol total) are added into wells H1, H2, and H3. Refer to the plate maps in Table 2.
-
11.
Add 50 μL of antibody bead mixture to each well, pipetting up and down 3–4 times to mix completely. Use a fresh pipet tip for each well.
-
12.
Seal plate securely using a roller to press adhesive foil seal over all wells.
-
13.
Place plate on Labquake mixer using rubber bands, Velcro strips, or ties and turn on to mix slowly inverting overnight (12–16 h) at 4 °C.
Day Two
-
14.
Install the PCR magnet head on the Kingfisher bead handling platform.
-
15.
Prepare and load the following plates on the Kingfisher:
-
Plate 1: incubation plate (digested plasma, peptides, antibodies, and beads (~250 μL)).
-
Plate 2: 250 μL Antibody wash buffer 1 (1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS).
-
Plate 3: 250 μL Antibody wash buffer 1 (1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS).
-
Plate 4: 250 μL Antibody wash buffer 2 (0.1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS).
-
Plate 5: 30 μL Antibody Elution Solvent: (3 % ACN/5 % acetic acid).
-
Plate 6: 200 μL Antibody collection buffer: (1× PBS/100 mM Tris pH 8.0/0.03 % CHAPS/0.1 % sodium azide).
-
Plate 7: tip comb.
-
All solutions prepared for plates 1–4 and 6 are pipetted into KingFisher 250 μL wellplates. Solutions for elution (plate 5) are pipetted into a 96-well PCR plate. The tip comb is held in an empty 250 μL wellplate from plate 7. It is picked up at the beginning of the method to cover and protect the magnet and returned to plate 7 upon completion.
-
-
16.
Load the KingFisher program. Use the up ˄ and down ˅ arrows to scroll through methods until the one described in Table 3 is displayed (see Note 11 ).
-
17.
Remove plate from Labquake and centrifuge at 1400 RPM (130–400 × g depending on the type of centrifuge and rotor) for 30–60 s to remove liquid that may be on the seal surface. Typically, a SpeedVac concentrator centrifuge equipped with a microplate rotor is used.
-
18.
Remove the foil seal carefully (see Note 13 ).
-
19.
Place the incubation plate in plate position 1 on the Kingfisher.
-
20.
Press “start” to begin the method.
-
21.
When the KingFisher method is finished (approximately 20 min (see Note 14 ))—seal the incubation plate (plate 1) and the collected antibody bead plate (plate 6) with adhesive foil and store at −80 °C and 4 °C, respectively.
-
22.
Remove elution plate (Plate 5) from the KingFisher and place onto the autosampler magnet plate on wet ice.
-
23.
Label a fresh PCR plate “iMRM reverse curves” and add 5 μL of 3 % ACN/5 % HOAc to the wells designated in the plate map in Table 2.
-
24.
Using a multichannel pipet set to 20 μL, draw the eluate supernatant without touching the bottom of the well and transfer into corresponding wells of a fresh PCR well plate (see Note 15 ).
-
25.
Cover the PCR plates with silicon plate mats and transfer onto autosampler for LC-MRM-MS analysis (see Note 16 ).
3.5 LC-MRM-MS Analysis (Refer to refs. 3, 4, 12–17)
-
1.
Inject one-third of the sample onto a triple quadrupole MS instrument configured with nanoflow liquid chromatograph and autosampler configured with a trap and analytical column and perform MRM-MS experiments, unscheduled or scheduled using the transition masses in Table 4 (see Note 17 ).
-
2.
Verify the LC-MRM-MS system is ready for analysis by injecting and analyzing an appropriate system suitability standard [58], typically a mixture of peptide standards analyzed by MRM.
-
3.
Inject samples in order from lowest concentration point to highest, replicates one, two and three for each point (e.g. pt1—0 fmol rep1, rep2, rep3) followed by an injection of blank (3 % ACN/5 % HOAc). Continue in sequence for the rest of the samples up to point 8 (200 fmol) (see Note 18 ).
-
4.
Prepare a Skyline [59] document (version 3.1 https://brendanx-uw1.gs.washington.edu/labkey/project/home/software/Skyline/begin.view) that contains the peptide sequences with the light and heavy peptide masses of the peptides analyzed by MRM-MS (see Note 19 ).
-
5.
Under Peptide Settings, confirm that the heavy label matches that heavy amino acid used for heavy peptide and select the light peptide as standard in the checkbox.
-
6.
Import the reverse curve MS raw data in Skyline from the File, Import, Results drop-down window, selecting the appropriate data files.
-
7.
Open and view the Result Grid, choose and add the columns “SampleGroup,” “Concentration,” and “IS Spike.” Enter the curve designation (e.g. “pt1”) and the concentration of heavy peptide (e.g. “0”) in “Concentration” and concentration of light peptide (e.g. “20”) in “IS Spike” (see Note 20 ).
-
8.
Select “Integrate All” from the “Setting” drop-down window (a check mark will appear when selected). This makes sure that the integration for one version of the peptide (light or heavy) is applied to the other peptide (light or heavy) automatically.
-
9.
Confirm peak integration. Select “Retention Times, Replicate Comparison” under the “View” drop-down window and use the Retention Time plot to identify potential chromatograms requiring manual re-integration.
-
10.
Activate QuaSAR from the “Tools” drop-down window [60].
-
11.
Perform statistical analysis (LOD, LOQ, CV [61–64]) to assess assay performance. Check “plot each peptide,” “CV table” and “LOD/LOQ table” under the “Generate” tab. Check “Standard present” and set “Analyte” and “Standard” fields as heavy area and light area, respectively. Accept default settings for AuDIT [63] and plot scales (see Note 21 ).
-
12.
Evaluate analysis of the data and report assay performance using a combination of plots of the concentration curves, CV and LOD box and whisker plots for all peptides in the multiplex iMRM assay as shown in Fig. 2.
4 Notes
-
1.
Prior experience using peptides synthesized with blocked termini (e.g. acetyl group on N-terminus, amide group on C-terminus) gave lower affinity anti-peptide Abs. Therefore we suggest not to use them. Trypsin treatment of proteins yields peptides with free termini. Peptide standards and the immunogen peptide sequence used for antibody generation, which may be synthesized with additional amino acids (e.g. Cys) for easier conjugation to KLH and purification media or spacer molecules (GSGS, or dPEG2, dPEG4) to increase immunogenicity, should be prepared as chemically similar to that expected from the native protein upon digestion with trypsin using amino acids with natural isotope (e.g. 12C > 13C > 14C) distribution and correspond to a tryptic sequence (R or K C-terminal amino acid).
Peptides selected as target analytes should, in general, be unique to the protein of interest as well as being unique in the proteome (i.e. proteotypic). Evaluating if the sequence of a target peptide is unique can be determined by BLAST analysis http://www.uniprot.org/blast/ of each target peptide sequence or in batch mode for a group of peptides using the Peptide String Match utility in Spectrum Mill (http://proteomics.broadinstitute.org/). Species specificity depends on the source of samples intended for analysis. Peptide Selector, another utility in Spectrum Mill, provides an initial in silico ranking of peptides to monitor based on mass, sequence, and theoretical retention time.
The best predictor of whether a given peptide will be useful for assay development is the observation of that peptide in your own data or public database containing high-quality MS and MS/MS data acquired on high-performance instrumentation at high mass accuracy and high resolution. Peptides can be ranked for assay development and synthesis based on frequency of detection, score (e.g., number and/or percentage of fragment ions in an observed spectrum that correspond to the target sequence) and retention time. Signal response by electrospray MS is another important parameter to consider, especially when deciding which of several peptides from a given protein to select for assay development. The response of tryptic peptides derived from the same protein can vary by up to 50-fold based on inherent physiochemical parameters [55]. In general, for peptides that are well recovered from sample processing, the peptides with the higher ESI-MS response will yield higher assay sensitivity. When this information is not readily obtained from available data, prediction tools can be used to algorithmically predict the highest responding peptides from a given protein using software tools such as ESP (http://www.broadinstitute.org/cancer/software/genepattern/esppredictor) or PeptideSieve [56] (http://www.systemsbiology.org/peptidesieve).
For iMRM assays designed to measure total protein, peptides containing amino acids susceptible to modification during biochemical processing (e.g. methionine oxidation, cyclization of N-terminal Glu or carboxamidomethyl Cys) should be avoided [12]. However, it is not always possible to do so, in which case multiple forms of the peptide may need to be synthesized and included in the final assay. Small biochemically introduced modifications such as phosphorylation or acetylation can be readily synthesized and assays constructed in the same manner as for unmodified peptides. Peptides predicted or known to contain large modifications such as N-linked carbohydrate should be avoided.
Synthesized peptides are purified by reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) and assessed for identity and purity by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) and RPLC, respectively. Quantity and concentration of peptide are determined by Amino acid analysis (AAA).
-
2.
Tryptic peptides will contain a C-terminal Lys or Arg unless derived from the C-terminus of the protein. These amino acids are preferred for stable isotopic incorporation for several reasons. The y-ion series of ions for tryptic peptides are usually among the most abundant ions in their MS/MS spectra. Each y-ion fragment will contain either the light version or the heavy version of Lys or Arg, depending on which version was selected for fragmentation in the MS. Several of these y-ions are monitored in the MRM-MS experiment and used for both identification and quantification. Use of common heavy amino acids at the C-termini of synthetic tryptic peptides also simplifies synthesis.
-
3.
Plasma was used for this evaluation because it is the matrix in which the assays were designed to measure analytes. Plasma is readily available from healthy subjects collected under appropriate IRB collection protocols, and can be obtained commercially.
-
4.
Immunogen peptides are conjugated to KLH, formulated with adjuvant and administered to New Zealand white rabbits following 77–120 day immunization schedules depending on vendor and protocol. Antibody titer is determined by peptide ELISA , coating free peptide on the plate. Rabbit sera with the highest titers are collected and purified by peptide affinity chromatography [46]. Glycerol and sodium azide are added to 25 % and 0.1 % respectively to aid antibody stability during freeze/thaw for antibodies stored at −20 °C and longer term storage at 4 °C [65, 66]
-
5.
Lymphocytes isolated from the spleens harvested from the rabbits used to generate polyclonal antibodies were isolated and fused with partner cells to generate a mixture of hybridoma cell clones which are expanded. After expansion and growth, subclones are picked, expanded further and tested until a single cell population (monoclone) with a positive screen against the target peptide (by ELISA or by automated iMRM format [67, 68]) is isolated. IgG is purified from monoclonal cell cultures or is sequenced and expressed as recombinant protein that are purified by antibody affinity chromatography or protein G chromatography, respectively.
-
6.
Dissolve IAA fresh for every digestion and do not reuse solutions. Continuous mixing is not necessary after the IAA is initially mixed. Since IAA breaks down when exposed to light, it is suggested to either use amber-tinted tubes that can be handled on the bench or to place the tubes in a light-tight enclosure during reaction.
-
7.
Concentration of urea needs to be reduced from the initial concentration of greater than 6 M to less than 1 M for optimum trypsin efficiency.
-
8.
This trypsin is purified from bovine pancreas, treated with l-(tosylamido 2-phenyl) ethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) to inhibit chymotryptic activity [69] and lyophilized after dialysis with 1 mM HCl. Trypsin in powder form is very flaky and light and highly susceptible to static interactions. Use a static gun and weigh without wearing gloves to reduce static electricity. Be cautious when pipetting dissolution solvent (next step) to avoid aerating and forcing trypsin out of the tube. The optimum pH for trypsin is 8.3. Trypsin becomes active immediately upon dissolution of its powder form in 0.2 M Tris–HCl pH 8.1. To terminate digestion, trypsin enzymatic activity is reduced by the addition of acid to reduce the pH below 3.0.
-
9.
Even if the samples are continuing directly to antibody affinity enrichment freeze these tubes at −80 °C. That way, freeze/thaw steps will be consistent between replicates, which is especially important when additional curve replicates are prepared for future studies.
-
10.
Under acidic conditions, peptides as well as immunoglobulin protein will elute from the protein G beads. The large amount of desorbed protein will eventually overload the 75 μm ID × 10 cm analytical column (packed with 3 μm C18) that we estimate has a loading capacity of approximately 1 μg. Crosslinking antibodies to protein G beads via primary amines with dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) allows the antibodies to be washed to reduce the amount of nonspecific background, the amount of bound passenger peptide (see Note 12) and retains the antibody on bead for the potential reuse. Antibodies cross-linked to beads should be tested by a capture efficiency test or mini-curve [46] prior to use.
-
11.
Bead processing begins by selecting and starting the method using the dialog box of the KingFisher magnetic bead handler. The method outlined in Table 3 was programmed using KingFisher software version 2.6 and then sent to the instrument via a serial port connection. It is not necessary to have the computer on or running during the method once it is programmed and loaded onto the KingFisher. Method settings, such as duration and intensity of bead mixing or bead collection times, can be changed when the method is open on the computer, saved and then re-sent to the KingFisher. Outline of bead processing steps performed on the KingFisher:Wash the beads twice with 250 μL PBS/0.03 % CHAPS (1.5 min per wash).Wash the beads once with 250 μL 0.1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS (1.5 min per wash).Elute the peptides in 25 μL of 3 % acetonitrile/5 % acetic acid (5 min).Collect used beads into a fresh collection plate (5 min).This method collects the magnetic beads after elution into a fresh collection plate (plate 6) containing Antibody collection buffer (1×PBS/100 mM Tris pH 8.0/0.03 % CHAPS/0.1 % sodium azide) and subsequently pooled, washed, and reused. When beads with crosslinked antibodies are used (see Note 11 ) these beads may be pooled, washed, and reused after re-equilibration in storage solution, 1×PBS pH 7.4/0.03 % CHAPS/0.1 % NaN3. They can be stored for longer terms (6 months or longer at 4 °C depending on the antibody), but should be retested prior to reuse.
-
12.
Antibody mixtures may be made in advance of reverse curve preparations and stored at 4 °C for 3 months. Antibodies stored for longer than 3 month at 4 °C after thawing should be evaluated by a capture efficiency test or mini-curve [46] prior to use. Total mixture volume is dependent on the individual antibody concentrations. There are six monoclonal antibodies and 14 polyclonal antibodies in this 20-plex iMRM assay. Since 2 μg of each polyclonal antibody and 0.5 μg of each monoclonal antibody are used per enrichment, there will be 31 μg of total IgG added to each well (refer to Table 1). Protein G binding capacities depend on the type and size of bead and should be tested empirically for each batch and bead type. Protein G is a bacterial-derived protein that binds to the Fc portion of immunoglobulin heavy chain 66], and is the recommended ligand for binding antibodies derived from rabbit. Protein G is commercially available conjugated on many bead types and sizes, from larger 20 μm porous beads to smaller 1 μm magnetic beads. Magnetic beads were chosen to make the process more amenable to automation. Here, we found 2 μL of 1 μm protein G magnetic beads sufficient to bind 1 μg of antibody. At this plex level, 62 μL of 1 μm beads are required per enrichment. If larger beads are used (e.g., 2.8 μm beads), more beads will be required leading to some increase in nonspecific binding. Binding capacities of alternate sources of protein G magnetic beads should be tested prior to use.
-
13.
Removing the foil seal can be tricky, especially after being well applied and tumble mixed overnight. It may tear off in pieces, requiring multiple grip and tear motions to completely remove. The plate must be securely controlled in one hand to prevent it from tipping and mixing the contents of neighboring wells on the plate.
-
14.
The duration and overall lapse time for the steps was optimized to keep the KingFisher method wash and elution time to less than 30 min. This upper time limit is based on the estimated Kd of these rabbit polyclonal antibodies calculated from the off-time measured under constant flow conditions in 1× PBS pH 7.4 [70].
-
15.
Transferring 20 μL of eluate supernatant to a fresh PCR plate (or to fresh wells on the same plate) was found to increase the reproducibility of the subsequent LC-MRM-MS analysis by removing particulates and other precipitous solids may form during the wash and elution process. After placing the PCR plate on the autosampler magnet plate, wait 1–3 min for the magnet to draw and collect residual magnetic beads to the side before drawing up the eluate supernatant. However, it is not imperative to remove the entire volume from each well nor equivalent volumes from all wells since the heavy peptide standard have already been added to account for the variation that may occur during this process.
-
16.
In cases where MS analysis may not occur right away, plates may be resealed with aluminum foil seals and stored at −80 °C until the instrument is ready. Prolonged freezer storage of digested plasma or enrichments from digested plasma may produce addition particulates and precipitate, which should be removed as described above using a magnet plate holder. Plates may be centrifuged briefly after thawing a frozen plate, for less than 2 min at 250 × g, to collect particulates in the bottom of the well. Although it is preferred to analyze a plate soon after processing, in some situations, laboratory workflows may be segregated between individuals or sites or labs, which may make immediate analysis difficult. For these samples, processed iMRM samples may be sealed and frozen immediately after the automated wash and elution steps on the KingFisher and not transferred to a fresh plate until the day of MS analysis. Although a full stability study has not been conducted, to reduce nonspecific losses to plastic and evaporation, minimize the length of storage of antibody-enriched plates at −80 °C (preferably within a month of processing). This method was designed to prepare samples intended to be injected onto a LC configured for trap/elute [46, 49], i.e. samples are injected onto a trap column, washed to remove salts, then the valves are switched to put the trap in-line with an analytical column. Alternatively, samples may be desalted off-line using StageTips [71] or other SPE/C18 cartridges or columns and subsequently injected onto a MS equipped with a single analytical column format.
-
17.
Instrument operating parameters should be optimized separately using mixtures of light and heavy peptides formulated in 3 % ACN/5 % HOAc containing 0.2 % digested plasma at a concentration suitable to inject 100 fmol in a background of ~100 ng plasma peptides to optimize instrument dependent conditions, such as source gas and collision energy. To prepare 0.2 % digested plasma, resuspend a 0.3 mL equivalent of digested plasma in 1× PBS/0.03 % CHAPS as described in Subheading 3.2, step 4. Pipet 10 μL into 10 mL of 3 % ACN/5 % HOAc and use this matrix to dilute the heavy and light peptide mixtures to 50 or 100 fmol/μL. Alternatively, 10 μL of the digested plasma resuspended as described in Subheading 3.2, step 4 can be added to 10 mL of 3 % ACN/5 % HOAc prior to the preparation of the reverse curve background matrix described in Subheading 3.2, step 7.
Scheduled methods constrain the MRM scans to a defined a retention time window. Typically a retention time window of between 2 and 10 min is used when the number of peptides in an experiment exceeds 40 peptides. In this iMRM assay for example, MRM-MS analysis of 40 peptides, 20 light and 20 heavy, 3 transitions/peptide, requires a total of 120 scans for one measurement of each transition. Using a dwell time of 10 ms, it would take 1200 ms to complete one cycle. If the average peptide chromatographic peak width is 15 s (this may vary depending on the peptide retention time, LC, and column conditions) approximately 12.5 cycles or over 12 scans per transition could be acquired without scheduling. By only monitoring for peptides at their retention time (±2–5 min), scheduled MRM can be used to maintain the number of scans per transitions as the number of peptides (thus transitions) increases [15]. The number of peptides in this iMRM assay (20 peptide pairs, 40 total peptides, 3 transitions/peptide, 120 transitions total) can be acquired with over ten scans per transition, but the differences in precision offered by scheduled MRM can also be assessed. In our experience, ten or more scans over the elution profile of each peptide is needed for good inter- and intra-lab reproducibility [14, 49] although there are instances where this cannot be achieved and a lower number must be used to accommodate the plex size and chromatography conditions used. It is important for the publication of results and for method comparisons to state the number of scans used per peak area determination to compare results to across instrument platforms. These methods can be prepared, both for collision energy optimization and final data collection by exporting instrument-specific conditions from a Skyline document containing these peptides.
-
18.
To minimize carryover, wash methods should be added in between each set of concentration points. Typically we insert two rapid reversed-phase gradients that cover the same or even a broader range of acetonitrile concentrations than used in the analytical gradient [58].
-
19.
A Skyline document containing the peptide sequences and selected masses and transitions of the light and heavy peptides analyzed by MRM-MS may have been done earlier as part of iMRM methods generation. Spectral libraries for each peptide may have been generated and imported into the Skyline document for earlier data-dependent MS analysis. Spectral libraries displayed within Skyline are not required for integrating and processing these data, however, they provide helpful information troubleshooting data that are affected by interferences either from changes in matrix or chromatographic conditions.
-
20.
Units of concentration are fmol/μL plasma (e.g. enter “20” for pt 8 which contains a total (see plate map in Table 2) of 200 fmol per well. Even though the total volume is 200 μL per well and the peptide concentration at the time of immunoaffinity capture is 1 fmol/μL, the concentration entered into the Results Grid is based on the starting amount of 10 μL of plasma per well. Concentrations are entered into the results grids as numbers without units.
-
21.
When Quasar starts it will open an Immediate Window in Skyline where progress and any errors can be monitored. LOD, LOQ, and CVs for each transition will be calculated and summarized in two tables, one for all transitions and a second table for the performance of the best transition selected as the transition with the lowest CV. Box and whisker plots of these results as well as calibration or response curves will be generated as linear and log plots. Summary tables for the regression line, including R2 and standard errors, slope and intercept will be generated and saved in the same Skyline directory.
-
22.
Under acidic conditions, peptides as well as immunoglobulin protein will elute from the protein G beads. The large amount of desorbed protein will eventually overload the 75 μm ID × 10 cm analytical column (packed with 3 μm C18) that we estimate has a loading capacity of approximately 1 μg. Crosslinking antibodies to protein G beads via primary amines with dimethyl pimelimidate (DMP) allows the antibodies to be washed to reduce the amount of nonspecific background, the amount of bound passenger peptide (see Note 122) and retains the antibody on bead for the potential reuse. Antibodies cross-linked to beads should be tested by a capture efficiency test or mini-curve [46] prior to use.
References
Carr SA, Abbatiello SE, Ackermann BL, Borchers C, Domon B, Deutsch EW, Grant RP, Hoofnagle AN, Hüttenhain R, Koomen JM, Liebler DC, Liu T, Maclean B, Mani D, Mansfield E, Neubert H, Paulovich AG, Reiter L, Vitek O, Aebersold R, Anderson L, Bethem R, Blonder J, Boja E, Botelho J, Boyne M, Bradshaw RA, Burlingame AL, Chan D, Keshishian H, Kuhn E, Kinsinger C, Lee JS, Lee SW, Moritz R, Oses-Prieto J, Rifai N, Ritchie J, Rodriguez H, Srinivas PR, Townsend RR, Van Eyk J, Whiteley G, Wiita A, Weintraub S (2014) Targeted peptide measurements in biology and medicine: best practices for mass spectrometry-based assay development using a fit-for-purpose approach. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(3):907–917, PMCID: PMC3945918
Gillette MA, Carr SA (2013) Quantitative analysis of peptides and proteins in biomedicine by targeted mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 10:28–34
Picotti P, Aebersold R (2012) Selected reaction monitoring-based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat Methods 9:555–566
Liebler DC, Zimmermann LJ (2013) Targeted quantitation of proteins by mass spectrometry. Biochemistry 52:3797–3806
Addona TA, Shi X, Keshishian H, Mani DR, Burgess M, Gillette MA, Clauser KR, Shen DX, Lewis GD, Farrell LA, Fifer MA, Sabatine MS, Gerszten RE, Carr SA (2011) A pipeline that integrates the discovery and verification of plasma protein biomarkers reveals candidate markers for cardiovascular disease. Nat Biotechnol 29:635–643
Whiteaker JR, Lin CW, Kennedy J, Hou LM, Trute M, Sokal I, Yan P, Schoenherr RM, Zhao L, Voytovich UJ, Kelly-Spratt KS, Krasnoselsky A, Gafken PR, Hogan JM, Jones LA, Wang P, Amon L, Chodosh LA, Nelson PS, McIntosh MW, Kemp CJ, Paulovich AG (2011) A targeted proteomics-based pipeline for verification of biomarkers in plasma. Nat Biotechnol 29:625–634
Keshishian H, Burgess MW, Gillette MA, Mertins P, Clauser KR, Mani DR, Kuhn EW, Farrell LA, Gerszten RE, Carr SA (2015) Multiplexed, quantitative workflow for sensitive biomarker discovery in plasma yields novel candidates for early myocardial injury. Mol Cell Proteomics 14(9):2375–2393. doi:10.1074/mcp.M114.046813
Keshishian H, Addona T, Burgess M, Mani DR, Shi X, Kuhn E, Sabatine MS, Gerszten RE, Carr SA (2009) Quantification of cardiovascular biomarkers in patient plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:2339–2349
Creech AL, Taylor JE, Maier VK, Wu X, Feeney CM, Udeshi ND, Peach SE, Boehm JS, Lee JT, Carr SA, Jaffe JD (2015) Building the Connectivity Map of epigenetics: chromatin profiling by quantitative targeted mass spectrometry. Methods 72:57–64. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.10.033
Yuan W, Sanda M, Wu J, Koomen J, Goldman R (2015) Quantitative analysis of immunoglobulin subclasses and subclass specific glycosylation by LC–MS–MRM in liver disease. Proteomics 116:24–33
Anderson L, Hunter CL (2006) Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 5:573–588
Keshishian H, Addona T, Burgess M, Kuhn E, Carr SA (2007) Quantitative, multiplexed assays for low abundance proteins in plasma by targeted mass spectrometry and stable isotope dilution. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:2212–2229
Addona TA, Abbatiello SE, Schilling B, Skates SJ, Mani DR, Bunk DM, Spiegelman CH, Zimmerman LJ, Ham AJL, Keshishian H, Hall SC, Allen S, Blackman RK, Borchers CH, Buck C, Cardasis HL, Cusack MP, Dodder NG, Gibson BW, Held JM, Hiltke T, Jackson A, Johansen EB, Kinsinger CR, Li J, Mesri M, Neubert TA, Niles RK, Pulsipher TC, Ransohoff D, Rodriguez H, Rudnick PA, Smith D, Tabb DL, Tegeler TJ, Variyath AM, Vega-Montoto LJ, Wahlander A, Waldemarson S, Wang M, Whiteaker JR, Zhao L, Anderson NL, Fisher SJ, Liebler DC, Paulovich AG, Regnier FE, Tempst P, Carr SA (2009) Multi-site assessment of the precision and reproducibility of multiple reaction monitoring-based measurements of proteins in plasma. Nat Biotechnol 27:633–641
Abbatiello SE, Schilling B, Mani DR, Zimmermann LJ, Hall SC, MacLean B, Albertolle M, Allen S, Burgess M, Cusack MP, Ghosh M, Hedrick V, Held JM, Inerowicz HD, Jackson A, Keshishian H, Kinsinger CR, Lyssand J, Makowski L, Mesri M, Rodriguez H, Rudnick P, Sadowski P, Sedransk N, Shaddox K, Skates SJ, Kuhn E, Smith D, Whiteaker JR, Whitwell C, Zhang S, Borchers CH, Fisher SJ, Gibson BW, Liebler DC, MacCoss MJ, Neubert TA, Paulovich AG, Regnier FE, Tempst P, Carr SA (2015) Large-scale inter-laboratory study to develop, analytically validate and apply highly multiplexed, quantitative peptide assays to measure cancer-relevant proteins in plasma. Mol Cell Proteomics 14(9):2357–2374. doi:10.1074/mcp.M114.047050
Burgess MW, Keshishian H, Mani DR, Gillette MA, Carr SA (2014) Simplified and efficient quantification of low abundance proteins at very high multiplex by targeted mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 13(4):1137–1149
Picotti P, Rinner O, Stallmach R, Dautel F, Farrah T, Domon B, Wenschuh H, Aebersold R (2010) High-throughput generation of selected reaction-monitoring assays for proteins and proteomes. Nat Methods 7:43–46. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1408
Ebhardt HA (2014) Selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry: a methodology overview. Methods Mol Biol 1072:209–222
Peterson AC, Russell JD, Bailey DJ, Westphall MS, Coon JJ (2012) Parallel reaction monitoring for high resolution and high mass accuracy quantitative, targeted proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:1475–1488. doi:10.1074/mcp.O112.020131
Gallien S, Duriez E, Crone C, Kellmann M, Moehring T, Domon B (2012) Targeted proteomic quantification on quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer. Mol Cell Proteomics 11:12. doi:10.1074/mcp.O112.019802
Gallien S, Kim SY, Domon B (2015) Large-scale targeted proteomics using internal standard triggered-parallel reaction monitoring. Mol Cell Proteomics 14(6):1630–1644. doi:10.1074/mcp.O114.043968
Barnidge DR, Dratz EA, Martin T, Bonilla LE, Moran LB, Lindall A (2003) Absolute quantification of the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin by LC/MS/MS using proteolysis product peptides and synthetic peptide standards. Anal Chem 75:445–451
Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O, Kirschner MW, Gygi SP (2003) Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:6940–6945
Kuhn E, Wu J, Karl J, Liao H, Zolg W, Guild B (2004) Quantification of C-reactive protein in the serum of patients with rheumatoid arthritis using multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry and 13C-labeled peptide standards. Proteomics 4:1175–1186
Brun V, Dupuis A, Adrait A, Marcellin M, Thomas D, Court M, Vandenesch F, Garin J (2007) Isotope-labeled protein standards. Mol Cell Proteomics 6:2139–2149
Singh R, Crow FW, Babic N, Lutz WH, Lieske JC, Larson TS, Kumar R (2007) A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for the quantification of urinary albumin using a novel N-15-isotopically labeled albumin internal standard. Clin Chem 53:540–542
Echan LA, Hsin-Yao Tang HY, Nadeem Ali-Khan N, KiBeom Lee K, Speicher DW (2005) Depletion of multiple high-abundance proteins improves protein profiling capacities of human serum and plasma. Proteomics 5(13):3292–3303. doi:10.1002/pmic.200401228
Hinerfeld D, Innamorati D, Pirro J, Tam SW (2004) Serum/plasma depletion with chicken immunoglobulin Y antibodies for proteomic analysis from multiple mammalian species. J Biomol Tech 15(3):184–190
Liu T, Qian WJ, Mottaz HM, Gritsenko MA, Norbeck AD, Moore RJ, Purvine SO, Camp DG 2nd, Smith RD (2006) Evaluation of multiprotein immunoaffinity subtraction for plasma proteomics and candidate biomarker discovery using mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 5(11):2167–2174
Qian WJ, Kaleta DT, Petritis BO, Jiang H, Liu T, Zhang X, Mottaz HM, Varnum SM, Camp DG 2nd, Huang L, Fang X, Zhang WW, Smith RD (2008) Enhanced detection of low abundance human plasma proteins using a tandem IgY12-SuperMix immunoaffinity separation strategy. Mol Cell Proteomics 7(10):1963–1973
Tu C, Rudnick RA, Martinez MY, Cheek KL, Stein SE, Slebos RJC, Liebler DC (2010) Depletion of abundant plasma proteins and limitations of plasma proteomics. J Proteome Res 9(10):4982–4991
Yang F, Shen Y, Camp DG II, Smith RD (2012) High pH reversed-phase chromatography with fraction concatenation as an alternative to strong-cation exchange chromatography for two-dimensional proteomic analysis. Expert Rev Proteomics 9(2):129–134. doi:10.1586/epr.12.15
Batth TS, Francavilla C, Jesper V, Olsen JV (2014) Off-line high-pH reversed-phase fractionation for in-depth phosphoproteomics. J Proteome Res 13:6176–6186. doi:10.1021/pr500893m
Mertins P, Yang F, Liu T, Mani DR, Petyuk VA, Gillette MA, Clauser KR, Qiao JW, Gritsenko MA, Moore RJ, Levine DA, Townsend R, Erdmann-Gilmore P, Snider JE, Davies SR, Ruggles KV, Fenyo D, Kitchens RT, Li S, Olvera N, Dao F, Rodriguez H, Chan DW, Liebler D, White F, Rodland KD, Mills GB, Smith RD, Paulovich AG, Ellis M, Carr SA (2014) Ischemia in tumors induces early and sustained phosphorylation changes in stress kinase pathways but does not affect global protein levels. Mol Cell Proteomics 13:1690–1704. doi:10.1074/mcp.M113.036392, First published on April 9, 2014
Shi T, Fillmore TL, Sun X, Zhao R, Schepmoes AA, Hossain M, Xie F, Wu S, Kim JS, Jones N, Moore RJ, Paša-Tolić L, Kagan J, Rodland KD, Liu T, Tang K, Camp DG II, Smith RD, Qian WJ (2012) Antibody-free, targeted mass-spectrometric approach for quantification of proteins at low picogram per milliliter levels in human plasma/serum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(38):15395–15400
Dickson C (2008) Protein techniques: immunoprecipitation, in vitro kinase assays, and Western blotting. Methods Mol Biol 461:735–744. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-483-8_53
Kaboord B, Perr M (2008) Isolation of proteins and protein complexes by immunoprecipitation. Methods Mol Biol 424:349–364. doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-064-9_27
Anderson NL, Anderson NG, Haines LR, Hardie DB, Olafson RW, Pearson TW (2004) Mass spectrometric quantitation of peptides and proteins using Stable Isotope Standards and Capture by Anti-Peptide Antibodies (SISCAPA). J Proteome Res 3:235–244
Whiteaker JR, Zhao L, Zhang HY, Feng LC, Piening BD, Anderson L, Paulovich AG (2007) Antibody-based enrichment of peptides on magnetic beads for mass-spectrometry-based quantification of serum biomarkers. Anal Biochem 362:44–54
Berna MJ, Zhen Y, Watson DE, Hale JE, Ackermann BL (2007) Strategic use of immunoprecipitation and LC/MS/MS for trace-level protein quantification: myosin light chain 1, a biomarker of cardiac necrosis. Anal Chem 79:4199–4205
Hoofnagle AN, Becker JO, Wener MH, Heinecke JW (2008) Quantification of thyroglobulin, a low-abundance serum protein, by immunoaffinity peptide enrichment and tandem mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 54:1796–1804
Kuhn E, Addona T, Keshishian H, Burgess M, Mani DR, Lee RT, Sabatine MS, Gerszten RE, Carr SA (2009) Developing multiplexed assays for troponin I and interleukin-33 in plasma by peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and targeted mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 55:1108–1117
Ocana MF, Neubert H (2010) An immunoaffinity liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for the quantitation of matrix metalloproteinase 9 in mouse serum. Anal Biochem 399:202–210
Whiteaker JR, Zhao L, Yan P, Ivey RG, Voytovich UJ, Moore HD, Lin C, Paulovich AG (2015) Peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and targeted mass spectrometry enables multiplex, quantitative pharmacodynamic studies of phospho-signaling. Mol Cell Proteomics 14(8):2261–2273. doi:10.1074/mcp.O115.050351
Palandra J, Finelli A, Zhu M, Masferrer J, Neubert H (2013) Highly specific and sensitive measurements of human and monkey interleukin 21 using sequential protein and tryptic peptide immunoaffinity LC-MS/MS. Anal Chem 85(11):5522–5529. doi:10.1021/ac4006765
Neubert H, Muirhead D, Kabir M, Grace C, Cleton A, Arends R (2013) Sequential protein and peptide immunoaffinity capture for mass spectrometry-based quantification of total human β-nerve growth factor. Anal Chem 85(3):1719–1726. doi:10.1021/ac303031q
Whiteaker JR, Zhao L, Abbatiello SE, Burgess M, Kuhn E, Lin CW, Pope ME, Razavi M, Anderson NL, Pearson TW, Carr SA, Paulovich AG (2011) Evaluation of large scale quantitative proteomic assay development using peptide affinity-based mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(4):M110.005645
Whiteaker JR, Zhao L, Anderson L, Paulovich AG (2010) An automated and multiplexed method for high throughput peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry-based quantification of protein biomarkers. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:184–196
Whiteaker JR, Zhao L, Lin C, Yan P, Wang P, Paulovich AG (2012) Sequential multiplexed analyte quantification using peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(6):M111.015347. doi:10.1074/mcp.M111.015347
Kuhn E, Whiteaker JR, Mani DR, Jackson AM, Zhao L, Pope ME, Smith D, Rivera KD, Anderson NL, Skates SJ, Pearson TW, Paulovich AG, Carr SA (2012) Inter-laboratory evaluation of automated, multiplexed peptide immunoaffinity enrichment coupled to multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry for quantifying proteins in plasma. Mol Cell Proteomics 11(6):M111.013854, PMCID: PMC3433918
Kushnir MM, Rockwood AL, Roberts WL, Abraham D, Hoofnagle AN, Meikle AW (2013) Measurement of thyroglobulin by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry in serum and plasma in the presence of antithyroglobulin autoantibodies. Clin Chem 59(6):982–990
Harris DC (2003) Quantitative chemical analysis, 6th edn. W.H. Freeman, New York
Li W, Cohen LH (2003) Quantitation of endogenous analytes in biofluid without a true blank matrix. Anal Chem 75(21):5854–5859
Jones BR, Schultz GA, Eckstein JA, Ackermann BL (2012) Surrogate matrix and surrogate analyte approaches for definitive quantitation of endogenous biomolecules. Bioanalysis 4(19):2343–2356. doi:10.4155/bio.12.200, PMID: 23088461
Whiteaker JR, Halusa GN, Hoofnagle AN, Sharma V, MacLean B, Yan P, Wrobel JA, Kennedy J, Mani DR, Zimmerman LJ, Meyer MR, Mesri M, Rodriguez H, Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (2014) CPTAC Assay Portal: a repository of targeted proteomic assays. Nat Methods 11(7):703–704. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3002
Fusaro VA, Mani DR, Mesirov JP, Carr SA (2009) Computational prediction of high responding peptides for development of targeted protein assays by mass spectrometry. Nat Biotechnol 27(2):190–198
Mallick P, Schirle M, Chen SS, Flory MR, Hookeun Lee H, Martin D, Ranish J, Raught B, Schmitt R, Werner T, Kuster B, Aebersold R (2007) Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat Biotechnol 25:125–1314. doi:10.1038/nbt1275
Kuhn E, Ross J, Abbatiello SE, Mani DR, Carr SA (2012) Reversing the curve: determining LOD in the presence of endogenous signal using SID-MRM-MS. Presented at the 60th annual conference on mass spectrometry, Poster MP01-004
Abbatiello SE, Mani DR, Schilling B, Maclean B, Zimmerman LJ, Feng X, Cusack MP, Sedransk N, Hall SC, Addona T, Allen S, Dodder NG, Ghosh M, Held JM, Hedrick V, Inerowicz HD, Jackson A, Keshishian H, Kim JW, Lyssand JS, Riley CP, Rudnick P, Sadowski P, Shaddox K, Smith D, Tomazela D, Wahlander A, Waldemarson S, Whitwell CA, You J, Zhang S, Kinsinger CR, Mesri M, Rodriguez H, Borchers CH, Buck C, Fisher SJ, Gibson BW, Liebler D, MacCoss M, Neubert TA, Paulovich AG, Regnier F, Skates SJ, Tempst P, Wang M, Carr SA (2013) Design, implementation, and multi-site evaluation of a system suitability protocol for the quantitative assessment of instrument performance in LC-MRM-MS. Mol Cell Proteomics 12:2623–2639. doi:10.1074/mcp.M112.027078
MacLean B, Tomazela DM, Shulman N, Chambers M, Finney GL, Frewen B, Kern R, Tabb DL, Liebler DC, MacCoss MJ (2010) Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics 26(7):966–968. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054
Broudy D, Killeen T, Choi M, Shulman N, Mani DR, Abbatiello SE, Mani D, Ahmad R, Sahu AK, Schilling B, Tamura K, Boss Y, Sharma V, Gibson BW, Carr SA, Vitek O, MacCoss MJ, MacLean B (2014) A framework for installable external tools in Skyline. Bioinformatics 30(17):2521–2523. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu148
Currie LA (1968) Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Anal Chem 40:586–593
Linnet K, Kondratovich M (2004) Partly nonparametric approach for determining the limit of detection. Clin Chem 50(4):732–740
Abbatiello SE, Mani DR, Keshishian H, Carr SA (2010) Automated detection of inaccurate and imprecise transitions in quantitative assays of peptides by multiple monitoring mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 56(2):291–305, PMCID: PMC2851178
Mani DR, Abbatiello SE, Carr SA (2012) Statistical characterization of multiple-reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (MRM-MS) assays for quantitative proteomics. BMC Bioinformatics 13(Suppl 16):S9. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S16-S9
Daugherty AL, Mrsny RJ (2006) Formulation and delivery issues for monoclonal antibody therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 58(5–6):686–706
Harlow E, Lane D (1999) Using antibodies: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA
Schoenherr RM, Zhao L, Whiteaker JR, Feng L, Li L, Lina L, Liu X, Paulovich AG (2010) Automated screening of monoclonal antibodies for SISCAPA assays using a magnetic bead processor and liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry. J Immunol Methods 353(1–2):49–61
Razavi M, Frick LE, LaMarr WA, Pope ME, Miller CA, Anderson NL, Pearson TW (2012) High-throughput SISCAPA quantitation of peptides from human plasma digests by ultrafast, liquid chromatography-free mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res 11(12):5642–5649. doi:10.1021/pr300652v
Kostka V, Carpenter FH (1964) Inhibition of chymotrypsin activity in crystalline trypsin preparations. J Biol Chem 239(6):1799–1803
Pope ME, Soste MV, Eyford BA, Anderson NL, Pearson TW (2009) Anti-peptide antibody screening: selection of high affinity monoclonal reagents by a refined surface plasmon resonance technique. J Immunol Methods 341(1–2):86–96
Rappsilber J, Ishihama Y, Mann M (2003) Stop and go extraction tips for matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization, nanoelectrospray, and LC/MS sample pretreatment in proteomics. Anal Chem 75:663–670
Acknowledgments
This work was supported in part by grants from National Institutes of Health: HHSN268201000033C and R01HL096738 from NHLBI and Grants U24CA160034 from NCI Clinical Proteomics Tumor Analysis Consortium initiative and 5U01CA152990-05 from the NCI Early Detection Research Network program (to SAC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Kuhn, E., Carr, S.A. (2016). Multiplexed Immunoaffinity Enrichment of Peptides with Anti-peptide Antibodies and Quantification by Stable Isotope Dilution Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry. In: Sechi, S. (eds) Quantitative Proteomics by Mass Spectrometry. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1410. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3524-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3524-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3522-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3524-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols