Abstract
Reproduction is a stepwise process that starts at the formation of gametes and ends at the completion of meiosis and the first mitotic divisions of the zygote. The involvement of main cytoskeletal elements in mediating the reproductive processes is now well established. This chapter summarizes recent advances in the field related to cytoskeletal dynamics underpinning the basic events of reproduction such as gametogenesis, gametes reciprocal activation, sperm-oocyte interaction and zygote formation. We have described the distinct patterns of distribution of microfilaments and microtubules and their rearrangements along the entire reproductive process. Evidences are provided that these elements play a dynamic role in the establishment and regulation of basic structure and functions of gametes and zygote during the processes of maturation and fertilization.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Reproduction
- Gamete activation
- Fertilization
- Oocyte
- Sperm
- Microtubules
- Microfilaments
- Cytoskeletal elements
Introduction
In animals, sexual reproduction is the biological process by which a new individual is generated through the fusion of the gametes, the spermatozoon and oocyte, that are formed during gametogenesis which in turn is underlined by meiosis, the peculiar process of cell division that provides haploid cells ready for fertilization. A correct maturation and reciprocal activation of gametes are pre-requisites for fertilization and, although their temporal and spatial sequences are not yet fully clarified, they involve numerous cellular structures, molecules, ions and metabolic pathways.
In the cell, the shape and structure are due to the cytoskeleton, a complex set of structures composed of microtubules, microfilaments and intermediate filaments that organize cytoplasmic organelles positioning and intracellular compartments, thus generating cell polarity and contractile forces [1–3].
Microfilaments are composed of actin proteins and play a crucial role in structuring the cell surface and plasma membrane during oocyte maturation and fertilization. They also participate in the maintenance of the meiotic spindle near the cortex, the formation of first and second polar body, the pronuclei apposition and cytokinesis.
Microtubules are tubular polymers of tubulin essential for chromosome movements as well as other aspects of motility and cytoplasmic architecture [4]. In most of the oocytes, microtubules are essential for the first and second meiotic division, furthermore they are fundamental for the swimming of the sperm as well as the union of the male and female pronuclei.
Many studies have been devoted to examine the factors that may influence the success of fertilization. This chapter will discuss the modification of gamete ultrastructure during the processes of oocyte and sperm maturation and fertilization, focusing on the crucial role of the cytoskeletal structures in ensuring a successful fertilization and normal embryo formation in some key species of marine invertebrates and mammals.
The Gametes
Oogenesis and spermatogenesis are characterized by meiosis, the unique process of cell division occurring only in gametes, whose goal is the production of haploid cells highly specialized for fertilization.
The Spermatozoon: Structure and Maturation
The primary function of the spermatozoon is to deliver the male genetic material into the oocyte to generate a new diploid individual. The success of fertilization depends on a series of processes based on a correct maturation of the spermatozoon, its transport toward a receptive oocyte and the ability to recognize and fuse with it. In order to perform these functions, the spermatozoon has developed a highly specialized morphology with different structural components each aimed to a specific processes. Basic structure of the spermatozoon is common to almost all the species and includes three major parts [5]: (1) the head, that is the site for recognition and fusion, has a roundish shape and contains a few structures such as the nucleus, scant cytoplasm and the acrosome that is a cap-like structure over the anterior half of the head; (2) the midpiece is located at the base of the head and includes the centrioles, few mitochondria, axoneme base and related anchoring structures; and (3) the tail is a long flagellum composed of an axoneme, a highly organized microtubule-based structure composed of about 250 proteins. A typical structure (9 + 2) is made up of peripheral doublets of longitudinal microtubules on which are fixed dynein arms and radial spokes and a pair of singlet microtubules located in the central core.
Unlike the oocyte, the spermatozoon undergoes the final step of the maturation process (spermiogenesis) through a dramatic change in shape and morphology passing from a round cell to the characteristic tadpole aspect.
An important feature of spermatogenesis is the change in the cytoskeleton that occurs throughout this pathway. Although primary focus is given to the microtubule cytoskeleton, the importance of actin filaments to the cellular transformation of the male germ cell has also been shown [6].
During spermatogenesis, diverse processes occur such as sequential changes in the nucleus and the acrosome in concert with a prominent bundles of microtubules called the manchette, a high condensation of chromatin in the nucleus and a cytoplasmic remodelling of the sperm body and structures [7, 8].
Actin has been shown to cooperate in various aspects of the spermatogenesis along with myosin, an actin-dependent motor protein. Actin is present in the form of monomer, oligomer and polymer within cells, the latter are called microfilaments and are involved in the shaping and differentiation of spermatids.
Three major cytoskeletal proteins, actin, actin-binding proteins such as spectrin and various tubulins (e.g. a-, b-, g-tubulin), are present in the head of mammalian spermatozoa with a pattern similar for all the species. Changes in localization of cytoskeleton support the image of cytoskeletal proteins as highly dynamic structures participating actively in processes prior to fertilization [9, 10].
During spermatogenesis, the actin cytoskeleton shows active remodeling. Some actin binding or actin regulated proteins have been demonstrated to regulate dynamic changes of the actin-containing structures. Myosin plays also an important role in acrosome biogenesis, vesicle transport, gene transcription and nuclear shaping [11].
The Oocyte: Structure and Maturation
The oocyte is the large cell characterized by a single function of generating a new individual. The general organization of a mature oocyte is similar along the species but sometime shows unique features [12], in fact, the oocyte is surrounded by extracellular membranes that appear to be thin in the sea urchin (the vitelline layer) [13] or tick in ascidians (the chorion) [14] and mammals (the zona pellucida; ZP) [15].
The oocyte plasma membrane marks the borderline between the internal and external compartments, represents a barrier to ions whose passage occurs towards the ion channels, specific proteins located inside the lipid bilayer [16]. Plasma membrane has many extensions, called microvilli, involved in the fusion process [17]. The cortical granules (CG) are round organelles situated in mono and multiple layers under the cell plasma membrane. CG originate from the Golgi complex and contain mainly enzymes and mucopolysaccharides; although they show a high variability in shape and size, they are present in the oocytes of most of the animals, playing a role during oocyte activation when they release their content by exocytosis [18]. The mitochondria are organelles playing key roles in the oxidative cellular energy metabolism. Their number and ultrastructural organization change with cell function and activity, infact oocytes, zygotes, and embryos present particular types of mitochondria [19].
Oocyte maturation is a complex process occurring at the end of oogenesis during which the oocyte completes its growth and undergoes a series of changes that are necessary for ovulation, fertilization and early embryo development. In the stage that precedes maturation, the oocyte is a large round cell with a big nucleus called germinal vesicle (GV) that at very early stage contains decondensed transcriptionally active chromatin [20].
Oocyte maturation involves two different but interlinked processes based on nuclear and cytoplasmic events [21–23].
Nuclear maturation starts when the oocyte under a chemical stimulation resumes meiosis inducing the breakdown of the GV (GVBD), the chromosome condensation and the spindle formation. A second meiotic arrest then occurs at different stages depending on the species such as metaphase I (MI) in ascidians, bivalves and gastropods, whereas mammalian oocytes complete the first round of meiosis with extrusion of the first polar body and, without an interphase, progress to the second meiotic metaphase (MII). Apart from some exceptions, this process is completed upon fertilization in almost all the species studied.
Cytoplasmic maturation is a less clear process that starts at the time of oocyte growth and occurs with the following events: (1) ultrastructural organelle re-organization; (2) molecular modifications of the plasma membrane; (3) differentiation of the calcium signalling machinery and (4) oocyte surface microvilli increase. Ultrastructural reorganization involves the redistribution of microfilaments and microtubules that in turn support the relocation of cytoplasmic organelles such as cortical granules, mitochondria and the Golgi apparatus in several species [18, 20, 24–35]. In particular mitochondria redistribution appears to be functional to oocyte developmental competence and the regulation of normal embryo development [36].
Fertilization
Fertilization is a highly specialized process of cell to cell interaction that marks the creation of a new and unique individual [23, 37]. The main steps of the fertilization process are gametogenesis, gamete reciprocal activation, sperm-oocyte interaction, fusion and syngamy, thereafter these successful events give rise to the beginning of development.
Reciprocal activation of gametes is fundamental for a successfully fertilization. First the oocyte induces sperm activation due mainly to the signals coming from the oocyte investments [38]. After a series of processes, the activated spermatozoon reaches the oocyte exerting its dual function: to transport the male genome into the oocyte and to trigger the quiescent oocyte into activation [39]. The latter is underlined by another series of events, that include electrical, structural and molecular changes, up to the release of oocyte from meiotic arrest [40] giving rise to the zygote, the first cell of the living organism that becomes an embryo after a series of mitotic divisions.
Cytoskeletal Elements Modulating Gamete Activation
The Spermatozoon
Sperm activation triggers in progression: (1) the sperm motility (chemokinesis); (2) the attraction toward the oocyte itself (chemotaxis); (3) the first binding mediated by ligands and receptors on the gamete plasma membrane; (4) the acrosome reaction (AR); (5) the penetration through the extracellular layers; (6) a second binding; and (7) the fusion of the two plasma membranes.
Sperm motility is required for sperm transport toward the oocyte, either in the aquatic environment or the female genital tract. Sperm motility is an essential condition for male fertility and is fully underlined by the tail. A flagellar movement is provided by the sliding of adjacent microtubules thanks to the ATP hydrolysis occurring in the mitochondria located on the close midpiece. In particular, the propagation of a wave is repeated along the flagellum by a mechanochemical cycle of attachment-detachment of dynein arms giving rise to the flagellar sliding and bending [41–43].
Recent proteomic analyses have provided insight into novel cellular and functional aspects of sperm actin isoforms in the axoneme of ascidians [44].
Motility initiation and hyperactivation are also supported by other specific cytoskeletal elements and dynamics such as major sperm protein (MSP) filaments in the nematodes [45, 46] and polymerization of actin in mammals [47, 48].
Chemotaxis is the process by which spermatozoa are attracted by microenvironmental factors mainly released by the oocyte or perioocyte layers [49]. To provide a more efficient motility, chemotaxis generates dramatic movement changes induced by the interaction of external factor with membrane “receptors” and intracellular messengers such as cyclic AMP, ATP, calcium, or pH changes. All the signaling molecules involved in this process are closely arranged in the sperm flagellum controlling dynein-microtubules interaction through a phosphorylation-dephosphorylation process of axonemal proteins [50].
The first contact between the two gametes is the binding of the sperm to the extracellular investments of the oocyte, this is a receptor-ligand interaction with a high degree of species- specificity that allows to prevent fusion of sperm and oocytes of different species. The carbohydrate groups on the oocyte surface function as sperm receptors. The sperm molecules that bind this receptor are not known with certainty, and indeed, there may be several proteins that can serve this function. In mammals the first association of the spermatozoon with the ZP occurs between the zona glycoprotein, ZP3, and sperm receptor, located on the sperm plasma membrane, such as the 95 kDa tyrosine kinase-protein. This interaction induces the AR [51]. The latter is an exocytotic process mediated by calcium occurring at the fusion of the outer acrosomal membrane with the sperm plasma membrane. The breakdown of the fused complex results then in the formation of a highly fusible membrane enabling the spermatozoon to penetrate into the oocyte and fertilize it.
Numerous cytoskeletal elements and proteins appear to be involved in either binding and AR, involving mainly the actin and mediated by numerous second messengers. Data suggest that actin polymerization may represent an important regulatory pathway which is associated with tyrosine phosphorylation in spermatozoa [52].
In echinoderms, the most important event which occurs during the AR is the polymerization of actin, which form the “skeleton” of the acrosomal process, a protuberance formed at the apex of the sperm head supported by a core of actin microfilaments [53, 54]. Apart this peculiar event in echinoderms, many authors have suggested that the acrosomal architecture is supported by a dynamic F-actin skeleton, which probably regulates the differential rate of release of the acrosomal enzymes during AR [55].
Changes and regulation of the sperm actin cytoskeleton in fact, take place during AR; in mammals, polymerization of actin from its globular (G)- monomeric form to filamentous (F)-actin occurs during capacitation, depending on phosphorylation processes. F-actin formation is important for the translocation of phospholipase C from the cytosol to the sperm plasma membrane during capacitation. Before the occurrence of AR, depolymerization of F-actin enables the outer acrosomal membrane to fuse with the plasma membrane [52, 56]. In support of this finding, an important role of actin polymerization has also been shown in human sperm AR since actin is present in the acrosomal area and is lost with the AR [57]. In human and other mammalian spermatozoa, cytoskeletal proteins including spectrin, F-actin and α-tubulin were mostly localized to the apical and the equatorial acrosomal region of the sperm head, and their modification after AR was evidenced suggesting, at least, that they may play more than a role in the development of the AR and priming the spermatozoa for other fertilization events [9, 10].
After AR is completed, the spermatozoon can begin penetration through the extracellular layers. Penetration may involve enzymatic hydrolysis of the extracellular matrix but also requires the forward physical force of sperm motility [58].
More specific structure are present on the sperm head of murids where two very large cytoskeletal structures seem to be involved in binding of the spermatozoon to the outer surface of the ZP and/or in aiding the spermatozoon in ZP penetration at the time of fertilization [59].
The possible role of actin filaments in the penetration of spermatozoa has been evidenced by indirect proofs in mammals since cytochalasin D inhibits sperm penetration and sperm head decondensation [60]. Similar investigations in mammals proved that either actin polymerization [61] and Rho protein(s) regulating actin-based cytoskeletal reorganization are involved in the process leading to sperm incorporation into the oocyte cytoplasm [62].
Once the spermatozoon penetrates the oocyte a fusion of the two plasma membrane occurs.
Sperm penetration occurs vertical to the surface of invertebrate oocytes possessing a jelly coat, whereas in mammals, sperm lies and fuse tangential to the oocyte surface [63]. In the latter, although the exact sperm fusogenic region is not fully established, studies suggest that this is a region overlapping either the equatorial segment or the postacrosomal region depending on the species under study [23]. Despite the importance of this fundamental process, little is known about its molecular basis. Although a number of molecules involved in the binding and fusion have been disclosed [64], indirect evidences supported the Izumo, a sperm-specific member of the immunoglobulin superfamily which relocalization to the equatorial segment after the AR is essential for gamete fusion and the testis-specific serine kinase 6 that plays a role in the changes of Izumo localization through the regulation of actin polymerization [65, 66]. Contrasting data from other authors [61] showed that, although involved in sperm penetration, actin polymerization is not required for plasma membrane gametes fusion in guinea pig.
Very recently, experiments aimed to investigate a role of proteins enriched in the cytoskeletal structures of human spermatozoa demonstrated that signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), present mainly in the flagellar structure, affects sperm functions such as motility parameters, AR and depolarization of mitochondrial membranes [67].
Evidences were presented of an involvement of organellar movements in the ascidian spermatozoon. This lacks an evident acrosome and midpiece but presents a single mitochondrion beside the nucleus in the head that swells at the time of oocyte interaction being translocated to the tail. Such a movement appear to be mediated by an actin-myosin sliding system [68]. To conclude, a very recent computational and experimental approach pointed out that the “actin polymerization” have some important and unique features by linking in a specific way all the intracellular compartments. Thus, it was suggested that actin polymerization could be involved in the signaling coordination of different events and that its functional ablation could compromise spermatozoa ability to complete the capacitation. This study strengthen the idea that the actin cytoskeleton is not only a mechanical support for the sperm cell, but that it exerts a key role in signaling during capacitation [69] (Fig. 6.1).
The Oocyte
In oocyte maturation, GVBD represents the nuclear event strictly related to the first meiotic block resumption and the following meiotic spindle formation. The involvement of cytoskeletal elements to GVBD has been investigated in several species.
In some mammals, actin filaments are distributed in a uniform way just around the oocyte cortex and close to the GV, and undergo a redistribution after the GVBD leading the chromosome to move to a peripheral position [70–74]; however this event does not seem to influence either GVBD or the spindle formation [32]. The presence of a cortical “organizing pole” of microfilaments has been hypothesized in the maturing mouse oocytes especially during centrosome localization, spindle (or GV) movement to the oocyte periphery [75]. In other vertebrates, such as amphibians, contrasting data exist on the role of cortical actin microfilaments that appear to be required for anchoring and rotation of the meiotic spindles [76] and the completion of GVBD [77]. In the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi, it has been identified the formation of conspicuous actin bundles emanating from the GV during its breakdown [78], and same authors showed that after GVBD a meiotic spindle forms in the center of the oocyte migrating toward the animal pole requiring actin cytoskeleton to support the polarization [79]. Although the latter event occurs normally in the absence of microtubules, cytoskeletal elements interact by each other giving rise to a fruitful interplay; this is the case of actin filament modulation of microtubules functions that drive chromosomes segregation in the mitotic and meiotic spindles, their positioning and orientation, processes that appear to be essential for the asymmetric cell division [80–83]. In fact, the synergy between microfilaments and microtubules has been supported by experiments based on specific chemicals such as cytochalasins [74, 84] in mammals. Similarly in amphibians, data are provided on the involvement of actin filaments in spindle anchorage [76, 85] and of myosin-10 (a phosphoinositide-binding actin-based protein) in association with microtubules in vitro and in vivo, with a specific localization at the point where the meiotic spindle contacts the F-actin-rich cortex [86].
The meiotic spindle consists of bundles of microtubules that emanate from two acentriolar poles and hold chromosomes along the metaphase plate. At meiosis resumption the spindle segregates sister chromatids or homologous chromosomes equally between the pronucleus and the second polar body playing a critical role in the generation of right chromosome segregation [87, 88]. Literature reports the requirement of microtubule associated motor proteins, for the proper distribution of chromosomes or the structural integrity of the mitotic or meiotic spindle [89]. Interestingly, it has been shown that a microtubules perturbation induces negative impact on GVBD and the meiotic resumption [90].
The interaction of the spermatozoon with the oocyte causes a series of physiological changes in the oocyte known as activation. An early event that occurs at fertilization is the change in the oocyte plasma membrane electrical properties [16, 39, 91] and the second main universal event is the massive release of calcium that traverses the oocyte in a wave [92–94], leading also to relocation of the organelles.
Organelles that have been organized in specific sites of the oocyte during growth and maturation undergo a relocation at the oocyte activation. In the ascidian Styela plicata we reported a pattern of mitochondria polarization and aggregation in the subcortical cytoplasm during oocyte growth [95]. These data strongly support what occurs in ascidian oocytes at the time of activation when the subcortical mitochondria are transported to the vegetal pole [96, 97]. This process called cytoplasmic segregation, that is necessary for the establishment of cell lines and in turn for determining the embryonic axis, involves myoplasmic actin-filaments network in a first phase whereas in the second phase involves extension of microtubules [14].
On the other hand the requirement of actin in the first phase after sperm contact has been shown [98] since perturbation of fertilization in ascidians with specific channel inhibitors altered either actin filaments and mitochondrial migration after contraction leading to a disturbance in the following cleavage formation. The regulation of mitochondrial translocation by microfilaments and microtubules observed in mammals indicated that either oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in pigs are associated with changes in active mitochondrial distribution and that this is mediated exclusively by microtubules [99]. However more recent evidence also indicates that the cytoskeleton network is used to shuttle organelles to specific sites within the oocyte cytoplasm [100].
Following the fusion of the spermatozoon with the oocyte plasma membrane, a third event occurs when the oocyte secretes the contents of CG by exocytotic fusions of these vesicles with the oocyte plasma membrane over the entire cell surface, also known as the cortical reaction or CG exocytosis [101]. This peculiar process is followed by an elevation or hardening of the extracellular coat involved in the polispermy prevention in sea urchin and mammals, however it does not occur in ascidians since their oocytes lack CG. Many cell types possess finger-like projections termed microvilli. In the sea urchin an ultrastructural study localized filamentous actin immediately subjacent to the microvilli forming an extensive interconnecting network along the inner surface of the plasma membrane with an organization of this network correlated to the positioning of the underlying CG [102]. That the microfilament assembly is involved in the distribution, movement and exocytosis of CG during maturation and fertilization has been shown by confocal microscopy in the pig oocyte. Here, it was suggested an integral changes in microfilament assembly and CG distribution during oocyte maturation, parthenogenic activation and in vitro fertilization [103]. Similarly in the rat it was supported the role of cytoskeletal cortex as a dynamic network that modulate CG exocytosis by activated actin-associated proteins and/or by activated protein kinase C [104].
As a consequence of cortical reaction the thousands of vesicles fusing with the oocyte surface, add their membranes to the oocyte plasma membrane resulting in an approximate doubling of the amount of membrane on the oocyte surface in a few seconds with the production of a mosaic topography, so the excess surface membrane is therefore accommodated by the elongation of oocyte microvilli [105, 106].
Earlier studies in the 1980 showed a dramatic reorganization occurring in the structure of the oocyte surface due to the mosaic membrane formed after activation and the resulting elongation of numerous short microvilli that covers the surface of the unfertilized oocyte. A localization of actin in the microvilli has been also deeply investigated in sea urchin species showing the formation of bundles of actin filaments in microvilli and in cones [107]. This suggested that this microvillar-associated actin was an organizational state composed of very short filaments arranged in a tight network and that these filament networks were extended beyond the plane of the plasma membrane [108].
In the cortical region of amphibian and rat oocytes it has been shown a significant amount of polymerized actin organized into bundles within the short microvilli covering the oocyte surface [109]. In the sea urchin, morphological studies evidenced two bursts of microvilli elongation concomitantly to sperm entering and incorporation, as a result of a massive polymerization of actin and a new assembly of microfilaments in the oocyte cortex reorganization that was suggested to produce the forces necessary to held firmly the spermatozoon for fusion and subsequently for cytokinesis occurrence [54, 110, 111]. More recent studies in mammals, further support the role of cytoskeletal actin in microvilli formation and their function to capture the sperm cell and bring it into close contact with the oocyte plasma membrane [17]. This data should also support the fact that in some mammalian oocytes the spermatozoon do not normally fuse with the microvillus-free area [112].
That sperm incorporation is a microfilament-dependent process has been shown in Xenopus [113] but this process has been described to also occur through the formation on the oocyte surface of a specific structure named the fertilization cone involving the functioning of actin microfilament organization. This process is related to the overmentioned elongation of microvilli and has been described to occur in the echinoderms [114–117]. In the sheep at the site of sperm head incorporation, the fertilization cone develops above the decondensing male chromatin and is underlined by a submembranous area rich in microfilaments [118].
Once the sperm has entered into the oocyte, the proximal centrosome adjacent to the sperm nucleus may become the center of the sperm aster that brings the male and female pronuclei to the center of the zygote [119]. Aster is a peculiar structure that appears initially after the centriole duplication at the pronuclear stage required for the union of the sperm and oocyte nuclei and is formed by the assembly of the microtubules mainly composed by the g-tubulin which is also needed for the subsequent enlargement and association with the female pronucleus [22, 120, 121]. In the rabbit, earlier studies showed the presence and continuous deposits of tubulin throughout the sperm penetration tunnels and entry point suggesting a role in fertilization, possibly as an enzyme binding or delivery system [122]. More recently it was shown that the microtubules extending from the decondensed sperm head participating in pronuclear migration and organization around the female pronucleus resulted mainly composed by γ-tubulin [123].
Among the events occurring at oocyte activation the change in the ionic permeability of the oocyte due to the generation of a ion current across the plasma membrane and calcium release play a pivotal role. Depending on the species, specific and nonspecific ion currents are involved at the early sperm-oocyte interaction [16, 124]. It is well established that actin filaments are important in ion channel regulation and membrane potential modulation [125, 126], although this does not seem to be the case of ascidian oocytes since actin filaments have no impact on the fertilization current or plasma membrane [98]. Indirect evidences support that spectrin, a major component of the membrane skeleton, is a functional link with membrane channels and transporters [127, 128].
Calcium release is the universal event occurring at fertilization in all species studied [94]. In the ascidians, fertilization at MI initiates a series of dramatic cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations of the zygote, which occur in two major phases [129]. The first major phase depends on sperm entry which triggers a calcium wave leading in turn to an actomyosin-driven contraction wave. The second major phase of reorganization occurs between meiosis completion and the first cleavage. Sperm aster microtubules and then cortical microfilaments cause the reposition toward the posterior side of the zygote of myoplasm and of domain rich in cortical endoplasmic reticulum and maternal RNAs [130].
The possibility that intracellular calcium signaling could be modulated by the actin cytoskeleton at the time of gamete interaction has been also recently hypothesized in starfish [131, 132] whereas in the sea urchin the calcium-responsive contractility during fertilization is modulated by the myosin II localized to the cortical cytoskeleton. This seems also to influence the fertilization cone absorption and to participate in the remodeling of the cortical actomyosin cytoskeleton during the following first zygotic cell cycle [133]. Finally a coordinated mobilization of intracellular calcium stores and a precise organization of the cytoskeletal network have been shown to be essential for an appropriate activation of the oocyte and chromosome migration during human fertilization [134].
Post-fertilization events include the sperm cell nucleus breakdown and chromatin decondensation that is then surrounded by an envelope forming the male pronucleus. The latter, together with the female pronucleus located just below the extruded polar body, start to move toward the center of the oocyte. These processes are under the influence of factors in the cytoplasm. Emission of the polar body due to meiosis resumption has been shown to be underlined by the formation of a contractile ring of actin in the cleavage furrow of the asymmetric division of the oocyte [70, 135] whereas migration of the pronuclei depends strictly on the microtubules of the sperm aster [63]. Rotation of meiotic spindle is under the control of microfilaments [76, 136] but a peculiar interplay between astral microtubules and cortical actin filaments has been suggested for spindle positioning [137–139] and pronuclear apposition. Although a main role of F-actin in the formation of contractile ring during the first cleavage division has been well documented [140], the cooperation between the two main cytoskeletal elements has also been identified in the Xenopus [141] (Fig. 6.2).
The Zygote
Right embryo development relies on the positioning of the cleavage plane which is in turn related to the position of the mitotic spindle. In the mouse zygote it has been demonstrated an accumulation of F-actin surrounding the spindle and that actin network maintains the central spindle position ensuring that the first embryonic mitosis is symmetric [142]. However, in the establishment of the right symmetry in cell divisions during differentiation and subsequent embryo development a central role is also played by the paternal centrosome [143] whose role and involvement of cytoskeletal elements has been previously reported. In fact, in bovine evidence have been provided that γ-tubulin and microtubule dynamics are involved in the migration and centration of the female pronucleus [144]. On the other hand indirect evidences exist that perturbation of tubulin polymerization induces meiotic delay and spindle defects contributing to formation of aneuploid mouse zygotes [145]. By contrast in human zygotes showing abnormal fertilization, no any kind of microtubule alteration with respect to the ploidy level was observed [146]. Also in the invertebrates the cortical actin cytoskeleton undergoes dramatic rearrangements with a level of F-actin decreasing after fertilization and continuing to decrease throughout the first cell cycle of sea urchin [147]. Such a dynamic nature of cortical actin organization during early development demonstrated also that cytokinesis occurs at the point of minimum cortical F-actin content suggesting that these changes do not function in the establishment of the contractile apparatus for cytokinesis, but rather serve other developmental functions [148]. Similarly in ascidians the determinants for unequal cleavage, gastrulation and further developmental events reside in four distinct cortical and cytoplasmic domains localized in the oocyte between fertilization and first divisions [96].
Conclusions
Involvements of cytoskeleton in reproductive processes have received the special attention of many authors. The related large body of literature shows an impressive variation along the species, however, common general characteristics of the process emerge, allowing to depict a general picture of the complex interplay between cytoskeletal elements and the physiology of fertilization. The cytoskeleton has a fundamental role in numerous cellular processes, consequently, it has been shown that abnormalities in the regulation of cytoskeleton dynamics are typical for many pathological states from infection processes up to cancer [149–151]. Fertilization is a multistep process in which all physiologically relevant events are intimately connected with each other and in turn are crucial for the entire process of reproduction; therefore it appears that only the right combination of multifactorial causes brings to a normal embryo and organism development. Here, we have reported that cytoskeletal elements as microfilaments and microtubules are involved in all the steps from the maturation of gametes, their reciprocal activation to the final interaction and the initiation of embryo development. Although sometime results are controversial and come from indirect experimental data, evidence are provided that perturbation of the cytoskeleton, with toxins or heath shock, exerts a wide range of impacts on the entire reproductive process including sperm maturation and motility, oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryo development [152–154]. Studies on human in vitro fertilization evidenced the delicate nature of the oocyte and the instrumental role played in fertilization reinforcing the view that: (1) exposure to mechanical stressors has the potential to compromise oocyte developmental competence; (2) defects in any of the aforementioned reproductive events are lethal to the embryo development and might be causes of infertility; (3) cytoskeletal dynamics perturbation of gametes may be considered a factor of human infertility [124, 155–161]. In this chapter, we wished to bring the general concepts that the major cytoskeletal structures are involved in the reproductive processes. We would like to apologize with the colleagues for not having reported all their valuable studies on animal models such as drosophila, zebrafish, nematodes etc., but given the vastness of the literature on a variety of animal species we have chosen to deal about those species which have always been models for the study of reproduction including either invertebrates and vertebrates.
Abbreviations
- AR:
-
Acrosome reaction
- CG:
-
Cortical granules
- GV:
-
Germinal vesicle
- GVBD:
-
Germinal vesicle breakdown
- MI:
-
Metaphase I
- MII:
-
Metaphase II
- ZP:
-
Zona pellucida
References
Bement WM, Ian Gallicano G, Capco DG (1992) Role of the cytoskeleton during early development. Microsc Res Tech 22:23–48
Elinson R, Houliston E (1990) Cytoskeleton in Xenopus oocytes and eggs. Semin Cell Biol 1:349–357
Gallicano GI (2001) Composition, regulation, and function of the cytoskeleton in mammalian eggs and embryos. Front Biosci 6:D1089–D1108
Longo FJ (1989) Egg cortical architecture. In: Schatten H, Schatten G (eds) The cell biology of fertilization, 1st edn. Academic, San Diego, CA
Koch RA, Lambert CC (1990) Ultrastructure of sperm, spermiogenesis, and sperm‐egg interactions in selected invertebrates and lower vertebrates which use external fertilization. J Electron Microsc Tech 16:115–154
Sperry AO (2012) The dynamic cytoskeleton of the developing male germ cell. Biol Cell 104:297–305
McLay DW, Clarke HJ (2003) Remodelling the paternal chromatin at fertilization in mammals. Reproduction 125:625–633
Toshimori K, Ito C (2003) Formation and organization of the mammalian sperm head. Arch Histol Cytol 66:383–396
Dvořáková K, Moore HD, Šebková N, Paleček J (2005) Cytoskeleton localization in the sperm head prior to fertilization. Reproduction 130:61–69
Lie PP, Mruk DD, Lee WM, Cheng CY (2010) Cytoskeletal dynamics and spermatogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:1581–1592
Sun X, Kovacs T, Hu YJ, Yang WX (2011) The role of actin and myosin during spermatogenesis. Mol Biol Rep 38:3993–4001
Sathananthan A (1997) Ultrastructure of the human egg. Hum Cell 10:21
Oulhen N, Reich A, Wong JL, Ramos I, Wessel GM (2013) Diversity in the fertilization envelopes of echinoderms. Evol Dev 15:28–40
Satoh N (1994) Developmental biology of ascidians. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Gupta SK, Bhandari B, Shrestha A, Biswal BK, Palaniappan C, Malhotra SS, Gupta N (2012) Mammalian zona pellucida glycoproteins: structure and function during fertilization. Cell Tissue Res 349:665–678
Tosti E, Boni R (2004) Electrical events during gamete maturation and fertilization in animals and humans. Hum Reprod Update 10:53–65
Runge KE, Evans JE, He Z-Y, Gupta S, McDonald KL, Stahlberg H, Primakoff P, Myles DG (2007) Oocyte CD9 is enriched on the microvillar membrane and required for normal microvillar shape and distribution. Dev Biol 304:317–325
Liu M (2011) The biology and dynamics of mammalian cortical granules. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9:149
Hyttel P (2011) Electron microscopy of mammalian oocyte development, maturation and fertilization. In: Tosti E, Boni R (eds) Oocyte maturation and fertilization: a long history for a short event. Bentham Science Publisher, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Voronina E, Wessel GM (2003) The regulation of oocyte maturation. Curr Top Dev Biol 58:53–110
Eppig JJ (1996) Coordination of nuclear and cytoplasmic oocyte maturation in eutherian mammals. Reprod Fertil Dev 8:485–489
Tsafriri A (1979) Mammalian oocyte maturation: model systems and their physiological relevance. Adv Exp Med Biol 112:269–281
Yanagimachi R (1994) Mammalian fertilization. Physiol Reprod 1:189–317
Albertini DF, Sanfins A, Combelles CM (2003) Origins and manifestations of oocyte maturation competencies. Reprod Biomed Online 6:410–415
Connors SA, Kanatsu-Shinohara M, Schultz RM, Kopf GS (1998) Involvement of the cytoskeleton in the movement of cortical granules during oocyte maturation, and cortical granule anchoring in mouse eggs. Dev Biol 200:103–115
Ducibella T, Anderson E, Albertini DF, Aalberg J, Rangarajan S (1988) Quantitative studies of changes in cortical granule number and distribution in the mouse oocyte during meiotic maturation. Dev Biol 130:184–197
Ferreira E, Vireque A, Adona P, Meirelles F, Ferriani R, Navarro P (2009) Cytoplasmic maturation of bovine oocytes: structural and biochemical modifications and acquisition of developmental competence. Theriogenology 71:836–848
Racedo SE, Rawe VY, Niemann H (2012) Dynamic changes of the Golgi apparatus during bovine in vitro oocyte maturation. Reproduction 143:439–447
Santella L, De Riso L, Gragnaniello G, Kyozuka K (1999) Cortical granule translocation during maturation of starfish oocytes requires cytoskeletal rearrangement triggered by InsP3-mediated Ca2+ release. Exp Cell Res 248:567–574
Schorderet-Slatkine S (1972) Action of progesterone and related steroids on oocyte maturation in Xenopus laevis. An in vitro study. Cell Differ 1:179–189
Stricker SA (2006) Structural reorganizations of the endoplasmic reticulum during egg maturation and fertilization. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17:303–313
Sun QY, Schatten H (2006) Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. Reproduction 131:193–205
Suzuki H, Yang X, Foote RH (1994) Surface alterations of the bovine oocyte and its investments during and after maturation and fertilization in vitro. Mol Reprod Dev 38:421–430
Tosti E, Boni R, Gallo A, Silvestre F (2013) Ion currents modulating oocyte maturation in animals. Syst Biol Reprod Med 59:61–68
Van Blerkom J (1991) Microtubule mediation of cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation during the early stages of resumed meiosis in cultured mouse oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:5031–5035
Bavister BD, Squirrell JM (2000) Mitochondrial distribution and function in oocytes and early embryos. Hum Reprod 15:189–198
Primakoff P, Myles DG (2002) Gamete fusion in mammals. In: Hardy DM (ed) Fertilization, 1st edn. Academic, San Diego, CA
Tosti E (1994) Sperm activation in species with external fertilisation. Zygote 2:359–361
Dale B (1994) Oocyte activation in invertebrates and humans. Zygote 2:373–377
Horner VL, Wolfner MF (2008) Transitioning from egg to embryo: triggers and mechanisms of egg activation. Dev Dyn 237:527–544
Inaba K (2003) Molecular architecture of the sperm flagella: molecules for motility and signaling. Zoolog Sci 20:1043–1056
Jouannet P, Serres C (1997) The movement of the human spermatozoon. Bull Acad Natl Med 182:1025–1034
Shingyoji C (2013) Measuring the regulation of dynein activity during flagellar motility. Methods Enzymol 524:147
Nakachi M, Nakajima A, Nomura M, Yonezawa K, Ueno K, Endo T, Inaba K (2011) Proteomic profiling reveals compartment‐specific, novel functions of ascidian sperm proteins. Mol Reprod Dev 78:529–549
Ma X, Zhao Y, Sun W, Shimabukuro K, Miao L (2012) Transformation: how do nematode sperm become activated and crawl? Protein Cell 3:755–761
Roberts TM, Stewart M (2012) Role of major sperm protein (MSP) in the protrusion and retraction of Ascaris sperm. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 297:265–293
Finkelstein M, Megnagi B, Ickowicz D, Breitbart H (2013) Regulation of sperm motility by PIP2(4,5) and actin polymerization. Dev Biol 381:62–72
Lin M, Hess R, Aitken R (2002) Induction of sperm maturation in vitro in epididymal cell cultures of the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii): disruption of motility initiation and sperm morphogenesis by inhibition of actin polymerization. Reproduction 124:107–117
Kaupp UB, Kashikar ND, Weyand I (2008) Mechanisms of sperm chemotaxis. Annu Rev Physiol 70:93–117
Hozumi A, Padma P, Toda T, Ide H, Inaba K (2008) Molecular characterization of axonemal proteins and signaling molecules responsible for chemoattractant‐induced sperm activation in Ciona intestinalis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 65:249–267
Barros C, Crosby J, Moreno R (1996) Early steps of sperm-egg interactions during mammalian fertilization. Cell Biol Int 20:33–39
Brener E, Rubinstein S, Cohen G, Shternall K, Rivlin J, Breitbart H (2003) Remodeling of the actin cytoskeleton during mammalian sperm capacitation and acrosome reaction. Biol Reprod 68:837–845
Tilney LG, Inoué S (1982) Acrosomal reaction of Thyone sperm. II. The kinetics and possible mechanism of acrosomal process elongation. J Cell Biol 93:820–827
Schatten G, Schatten H (1983) Fertilization and early development of sea urchins. Scan Electron Microsc (Pt 3):1403–1413
Zepeda-Bastida A, Chiquete-Felix N, Uribe-Carvajal S, Mujica A (2011) The acrosomal matrix from Guinea pig sperm contains structural proteins, suggesting the presence of an actin skeleton. J Androl 32:411–419
Breitbart H, Cohen G, Rubinstein S (2005) Role of actin cytoskeleton in mammalian sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction. Reproduction 129:263–268
Liu D, Martic M, Clarke G, Dunlop M, Baker H (1999) An important role of actin polymerization in the human zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction. Mol Hum Reprod 5:941–949
Miller DJ, Shi X, Burkin H (2002) Molecular basis of mammalian gamete binding. Recent Prog Horm Res 57:37–73
Breed WG, Idriss D, Leigh CM, Oko RJ (2009) Temporal deposition and spatial distribution of cytoskeletal proteins in the sperm head of an Australian rodent. Reprod Fertil Dev 21:428–439
Rogers B, Bastias C, Coulson RL, Russell LD (1989) Cytochalasin D inhibits penetration of hamster eggs by guinea pig and human spermatozoa. J Androl 10:275–282
Sánchez‐Gutiérrez M, Contreras RG, Mújica A (2002) Cytochalasin‐D retards sperm incorporation deep into the egg cytoplasm but not membrane fusion with the egg plasma membrane. Mol Reprod Dev 63:518–528
Kumakiri J, Oda S, Kinoshita K, Miyazaki S (2003) Involvement of Rho family G protein in the cell signaling for sperm incorporation during fertilization of mouse eggs: inhibition by Clostridium difficile toxin B. Dev Biol 260:522–535
Schatten G, Schatten H (1987) Cytoskeletal alterations and nuclear architectural changes during mammalian fertilization. Curr Top Dev Biol 23:23–54
Talbot P, Shur BD, Myles DG (2003) Cell adhesion and fertilization: steps in oocyte transport, sperm-zona pellucida interactions, and sperm-egg fusion. Biol Reprod 68:1–9
Inoue N, Ikawa M, Isotani A, Okabe M (2005) The immunoglobulin superfamily protein Izumo is required for sperm to fuse with eggs. Nature 434:234–238
Sosnik J, Miranda PV, Spiridonov NA, Yoon S-Y, Fissore RA, Johnson GR, Visconti PE (2009) Tssk6 is required for Izumo relocalization and gamete fusion in the mouse. J Cell Sci 122:2741–2749
Lachance C, Goupil S, Leclerc P (2013) Stattic V, a STAT3 inhibitor, affects human spermatozoa through regulation of mitochondrial activity. J Cell Physiol 228:704–713
Lambert CC, Lambert G (1984) The role of actin and myosin in ascidian sperm mitochondrial translocation. Dev Biol 106:307–314
Bernabò N, Berardinelli P, Mauro A, Russo V, Lucidi P, Mattioli M, Barboni B (2011) The role of actin in capacitation-related signaling: an in silico and in vitro study. BMC Syst Biol 5:47
Azoury J, Verlhac MH, Dumont J (2009) Actin filaments: key players in the control of asymmetric divisions in mouse oocytes. Biol Cell 101:69–76
Kim NH, Chung HM, Cha KY, Chung KS (1998) Microtubule and microfilament organization in maturing human oocytes. Hum Reprod 13:2217–2222
Longo FJ, Chen D-Y (1985) Development of cortical polarity in mouse eggs: involvement of the meiotic apparatus. Dev Biol 107:382–394
Terada Y, Fukaya T, Yajima A (1995) Localization of microfilaments during oocyte maturation of golden hamster. Mol Reprod Dev 41:486–492
Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Prather RS, Day BN (2000) Polymerization of nonfilamentous actin into microfilaments is an important process for porcine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Biol Reprod 62:1177–1183
Calarco PG (2005) The role of microfilaments in early meiotic maturation of mouse oocytes. Microsc Microanal 11:146–153
Gard DL, Cha B-J, Roeder AD (1995) F-actin is required for spindle anchoring and rotation in Xenopus oocytes: a re-examination of the effects of cytochalasin B on oocyte maturation. Zygote 3:17–26
Okada I, Fujiki S, Iwase S, Abe H (2012) Stabilization of actin filaments prevents germinal vesicle breakdown and affects microtubule organization in Xenopus oocytes. Cytoskeleton 69:312–323
Prodon F, Hanawa K, Nishida H (2009) Actin microfilaments guide the polarized transport of nuclear pore complexes and the cytoplasmic dispersal of Vasa mRNA during GVBD in the ascidian Halocynthia roretzi. Dev Biol 330:377–388
Prodon F, Chenevert J, Sardet C (2006) Establishment of animal-vegetal polarity during maturation in ascidian oocytes. Dev Biol 290:297–311
Brunet S, Verlhac MH (2011) Positioning to get out of meiosis: the asymmetry of division. Hum Reprod Update 17:68–75
Kwon S, Lim HJ (2011) Small GTPases and formins in mammalian oocyte maturation: cytoskeletal organizers. Clin Exp Reprod Med 38:1–5
Li R, Albertini DF (2013) The road to maturation: somatic cell interaction and self-organization of the mammalian oocyte. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14:141–152
McNally FJ (2013) Mechanisms of spindle positioning. J Cell Biol 200:131–140
Sun QY, Lai L, Park KW, Kühholzer B, Prather RS, Schatten H (2001) Dynamic events are differently mediated by microfilaments, microtubules, and mitogen-activated protein kinase during porcine oocyte maturation and fertilization in vitro. Biol Reprod 64:879–889
Ryabova L, Betina M, Vassetzky S (1986) Influence of cytochalasin B on oocyte maturation in Xenopus laevis. Cell Differ 19:89–96
Weber KL, Sokac AM, Berg JS, Cheney RE, Bement WM (2004) A microtubule-binding myosin required for nuclear anchoring and spindle assembly. Nature 431:325–329
Howe K, FitzHarris G (2013) Recent insights into spindle function in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Biol Reprod 89:71
Yllera‐Fernandez MDM, Crozet N, Ahmed‐Ali M (1992) Microtubule distribution during fertilization in the rabbit. Mol Reprod Dev 32:271–276
Sawin KE, Endow SA (1993) Meiosis, mitosis and microtubule motors. Bioessays 15:399–407
Ya R, Downs SM (2012) Perturbing microtubule integrity blocks AMP-activated protein kinase-induced meiotic resumption in cultured mouse oocytes. Zygote 1:1–12
Dale B, Wilding M (2011) Ionic events at fertilization. In: Tosti E, Boni R (eds) Oocyte maturation and fertilization: a long history for a short event. Bentham Science Publisher, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Krauchunas AR, Wolfner MF (2012) Molecular changes during egg activation. Curr Top Dev Biol 102:267–292
Ramos I, Wessel GM (2013) Calcium pathway machinery at fertilization in echinoderms. Cell Calcium 53:16–23
Whitaker M (2006) Calcium at fertilization and in early development. Physiol Rev 86:25–88
Bezzaouia A, Gallo A, Silvestre F, Tekaya S, Tosti E (2014) Distribution pattern and activity of mitochondria during oocyte growth and maturation in the ascidian Styela plicata. Zygote 22(4):462–469. doi:10.1017/S0967199412000640
Roegiers F, Djediat C, Dumollard R, Rouvière C, Sardet C (1999) Phases of cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations of the ascidian zygote between fertilization and first division. Development 126:3101–3117
Sawada T, Osanai K (1985) Distribution of actin filaments in fertilized egg of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Dev Biol 111:260–265
Tosti E, Romano G, Buttino I, Cuomo A, Ianora A, Miralto A (2003) Bioactive aldehydes from diatoms block the fertilization current in ascidian oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 66:72–80
Sun QY, Wu G, Lai L, Park K, Cabot R, Cheong H, Day B, Prather R, Schatten H (2001) Translocation of active mitochondria during pig oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryo development in vitro. Reproduction 122:155–163
Brevini T, Cillo F, Antonini S, Gandolfi F (2007) Cytoplasmic remodelling and the acquisition of developmental competence in pig oocytes. Anim Reprod Sci 98:23–38
Gadella B, Evans J (2011) Membrane fusions during mammalian fertilization. Adv Exp Med Biol 713:65–80
Bonder EM, Fishkind DJ, Cotran NM, Begg DA (1989) The cortical actin-membrane cytoskeleton of unfertilized sea urchin eggs: analysis of the spatial organization and relationship of filamentous actin, nonfilamentous actin, and egg spectrin. Dev Biol 134:327–341
Kim NH, Day BN, Lee HT, Chung KS (1996) Microfilament assembly and cortical granule distribution during maturation, parthenogenetic activation and fertilisation in the porcine oocyte. Zygote 4:145–149
Eliyahu E, Tsaadon A, Shtraizent N, Shalgi R (2005) The involvement of protein kinase C and actin filaments in cortical granule exocytosis in the rat. Reproduction 129:161–170
Begg DA, Rebhun LI, Hyatt H (1982) Structural organization of actin in the sea urchin egg cortex: microvillar elongation in the absence of actin filament bundle formation. J Cell Biol 93:24–32
Eddy E, Shapiro B (1979) Membrane events of fertilization in the sea urchin. Scan Electron Microsc 3:287–297
Tilney LG, Jaffe LA (1980) Actin, microvilli, and the fertilization cone of sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol 87:771–782
Henson JH, Begg DA (1988) Filamentous actin organization in the unfertilized sea urchin egg cortex. Dev Biol 127:338–348
Franke W, Rathke P, Seib E, Trendelenburg M, Osborn M, Weber K (1976) Distribution and mode of arrangement of microfilamentous structures and actin in the cortex of the amphibian oocyte. Cytobiologie 14:111–130
Burgess DR, Schroeder TE (1977) Polarized bundles of actin filaments within microvilli of fertilized sea urchin eggs. J Cell Biol 74:1032–1037
Cline CA, Schatten H, Balczon R, Schatten G (1983) Actin‐mediated surface motility during sea urchin fertilization. Cell Motil 3:513–524
Talansky BE, Malter HE, Cohen J (1991) A preferential site for sperm‐egg fusion in mammals. Mol Reprod Dev 28:183–188
Boyle JA, Chen H, Bamburg JR (2001) Sperm incorporation in Xenopus laevis: characterisation of morphological events and the role of microfilaments. Zygote 9:167–181
Kyozuka K, Osanai K (1994) Cytochalasin B does not block sperm penetration into denuded starfish oocytes. Zygote 2:103–109
Kyozuka K, Osanai K (1988) Fertilization cone formation in starfish oocytes: the role of the egg cortex actin microfilaments in sperm incorporation. Gamete Res 20:275–285
Schatten H, Schatten G (1980) Surface activity at the egg plasma membrane during sperm incorporation and its cytochalasin B sensitivity: scanning electron microscopy and time-lapse video microscopy during fertilization of the sea urchin Lytechinus variegatus. Dev Biol 78:435–449
Yonemura S, Mabuchi I (1987) Wave of cortical actin polymerization in the sea urchin egg. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 7:46–53
Le Guen P, Crozet N, Huneau D, Gall L (1989) Distribution and role of microfilaments during early events of sheep fertilization. Gamete Res 22:411–425
Yanagimachi R (2005) Male gamete contributions to the embryo. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1061:203–207
Palermo GD, Colombero LT, Rosenwaks Z (1997) The human sperm centrosome is responsible for normal syngamy and early embryonic development. Rev Reprod 2:19–27
Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H (1985) Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82:4152–4156
Stambaugh RL, Nicosia SV (1984) Localization of tubulin and microtubules of in vivo fertilized rabbit oocytes. J Androl 5:259–264
Terada Y, Simerly CR, Hewitson L, Schatten G (2000) Sperm aster formation and pronuclear decondensation during rabbit fertilization and development of a functional assay for human sperm. Biol Reprod 62:557–563
Swain JE, Pool TB (2008) ART failure: oocyte contributions to unsuccessful fertilization. Hum Reprod Update 14:431–446
Cantiello HF (1997) Role of actin filament organization in cell volume and ion channel regulation. J Exp Zool 279:425–435
Moccia F (2007) Latrunculin A depolarizes starfish oocytes. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 148:845–852
Dubreuil RR (2006) Functional links between membrane transport and the spectrin cytoskeleton. J Membr Biol 211:151–161
Machnicka B, Czogalla A, Hryniewicz-Jankowska A, Bogusławska DM, Grochowalska R, Heger E, Sikorski AF (2013) Spectrins: a structural platform for stabilization and activation of membrane channels, receptors and transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.05.002
Brownlee C, Dale B (1990) Temporal and spatial correlation of fertilization current, calcium waves and cytoplasmic contraction in eggs of Ciona intestinalis. Proc R Soc B 239:321–328
Sardet C, Paix A, Prodon F, Dru P, Chenevert J (2007) From oocyte to 16‐cell stage: cytoplasmic and cortical reorganizations that pattern the ascidian embryo. Dev Dyn 236:1716–1731
Chun J, Santella L (2009) Roles of the actin‐binding proteins in intracellular Ca2+ signalling. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 195:61–70
Chun JT, Vasilev F, Santella L (2013) Antibody against the actin-binding protein depactin attenuates Ca2+ signaling in starfish eggs. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 441:301–307
Stack C, Lucero AJ, Shuster CB (2006) Calcium‐responsive contractility during fertilization in sea urchin eggs. Dev Dyn 235:1042–1052
Rawe V, Olmedo SB, Nodar F, Doncel G, Acosta A, Vitullo A (2000) Cytoskeletal organization defects and abortive activation in human oocytes after IVF and ICSI failure. Mol Hum Reprod 6:510–516
Pickering SJ, Johnson MH, Braude PR, Houliston E (1988) Cytoskeletal organization in fresh, aged and spontaneously activated human oocytes. Hum Reprod 3:978–989
Zhu ZY, Chen DY, Li JS, Lian L, Lei L, Han ZM, Sun QY (2003) Rotation of meiotic spindle is controlled by microfilaments in mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod 68:943–946
Azoury J, Lee KW, Georget V, Rassinier P, Leader B, Verlhac MH (2008) Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments. Curr Biol 18:1514–1519
Maddox AS, Azoury J, Dumont J (2012) Polar body cytokinesis. Cytoskeleton 69:855–868
Schaerer-Brodbeck C, Riezman H (2000) Interdependence of filamentous actin and microtubules for asymmetric cell division. Biol Chem 381:815–825
Noguchi T, Mabuchi I (2001) Reorganization of actin cytoskeleton at the growing end of the cleavage furrow of Xenopus egg during cytokinesis. J Cell Sci 114:401–412
Takayama M, Noguchi T, Yamashiro S, Mabuchi I (2002) Microtuble organization in Xenopus eggs during the first cleavage and its role in cytokinesis. Cell Struct Funct 27:163–171
Chew TG, Lorthongpanich C, Ang WX, Knowles BB, Solter D (2012) Symmetric cell division of the mouse zygote requires an actin network. Cytoskeleton 69:1040–1046
Schatten H, Sun QY (2010) The role of centrosomes in fertilization, cell division and establishment of asymmetry during embryo development. Semin Cell Dev Biol 21:174–184
Morito Y, Terada Y, Nakamura S, Morita J, Yoshimoto T, Murakami T, Yaegashi N, Okamura K (2005) Dynamics of microtubules and positioning of female pronucleus during bovine parthenogenesis. Biol Reprod 73:935–941
Mailhes JB, Carabatsos MJ, Young D, London SN, Bell M, Albertini DF (1999) Taxol-induced meiotic maturation delay, spindle defects, and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes and zygotes. Mutat Res 423:79–90
Rawe VY, Olmedo SB, Nodar FN, Vitullo AD (2002) Microtubules and parental genome organisation during abnormal fertilisation in humans. Zygote 10:223–228
Heil‐Chapdelaine RA, Otto JJ (1996) Relative changes in F‐actin during the first cell cycle: evidence for two distinct pools of F‐actin in the sea urchin egg. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 34:26–35
Wong GK, Allen PG, Begg DA (1997) Dynamics of filamentous actin organization in the sea urchin egg cortex during early cleavage divisions: implications for the mechanism of cytokinesis. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 36:30–42
Döhner K, Sodeik B (2005) The role of the cytoskeleton during viral infection. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 285:67–108
Hall A (2009) The cytoskeleton and cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 28:5–14
Pardee JD (2009) The actin cytoskeleton in cell motility, cancer, and infection. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA
Roth Z, Hansen P (2005) Disruption of nuclear maturation and rearrangement of cytoskeletal elements in bovine oocytes exposed to heat shock during maturation. Reproduction 129:235–244
Silvestre F, Tosti E (2010) Impact of marine drugs on cytoskeleton-mediated reproductive events. Mar Drugs 8:881–915
Tamura AN, Huang TTF, Marikawa Y (2013) Impact of vitrification on the meiotic spindle and components of the microtubule-organizing center in mouse mature oocytes. Biol Reprod 89:112
Asch R, Simerly C, Ord T, Ord V, Schatten G (1995) The stages at which human fertilization arrests: microtubule and chromosome configurations in inseminated oocytes which failed to complete fertilization and development in humans. Mol Hum Reprod 1:239–248
Hafez E, Goff L, Hafez B (2004) Mammalian fertilization, IVF, ICSI: physiological/molecular parameters, clinical application. Arch Androl 50:69–88
Hewitson L, Phil D, Simerly C, Schatten G (2000) Cytoskeletal aspects of assisted fertilization. Semin Reprod Med 18:151–160
Salvolini E, Buldreghini E, Lucarini G, Vignini A, Lenzi A, Di Primio R, Balercia G (2012) Involvement of sperm plasma membrane and cytoskeletal proteins in human male infertility. Fertil Steril 99:697–704
Simerly C, Wu G-J, Zoran S, Ord T, Rawlins R, Jones J, Navara C, Gerrity M, Rinehart J, Binor Z (1995) The paternal inheritance of the centrosome, the cell’s microtubule-organizing center, in humans, and the implications for infertility. Nat Med 1:47–52
Terada Y (2007) Functional analyses of the sperm centrosome in human reproduction: implications for assisted reproductive technique. Soc Reprod Fertil Suppl 63:507
Zhivkova R, Delimitreva S, Vatev I (2010) Role of oocyte cytoplasmic factors in human IVF failure. Akush Ginekol 49:26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gallo, A., Tosti, E. (2015). Cytoskeletal Elements and the Reproductive Success in Animals. In: Schatten, H. (eds) The Cytoskeleton in Health and Disease. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2904-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2904-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2903-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2904-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)