Abstract
The recent advent of different digital PCR (dPCR) platforms is enabling the expansion of this technology for research and diagnostic applications worldwide. The main principle of dPCR, as in other PCR-based methods including quantitative PCR (qPCR), is the specific amplification of a nucleic acid target. The distinctive feature of dPCR is the separation of the reaction mixture into thousands to millions of partitions which is followed by a real time or end point detection of the amplification. The distribution of target sequences into partitions is described by the Poisson distribution, thus allowing accurate and absolute quantification of the target from the ratio of positive against all partitions at the end of the reaction. This omits the need to use reference materials with known target concentrations and increases the accuracy of quantification at low target concentrations compared to qPCR. dPCR has also shown higher resilience to inhibitors in a number of different types of samples. In this chapter we describe the droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) workflow for the detection and quantification of pathogens using the droplet digital Bio-Rad platform QX100. We present as an example the quantification of the quarantine plant pathogenic bacterium, Erwinia amylovora.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
López MM, Llop P, Olmos A et al (2009) Are molecular tools solving the challenges posed by detection of plant pathogenic bacteria and viruses? Curr Issues Mol Biol 11:13–46
Mackay IM, Arden KE, Nitsche A (2002) Real-time PCR in virology. Nucleic Acids Res 30:1292–1305
Kubista M, Andrade JM, Bengtsson M et al (2006) The real-time polymerase chain reaction. Mol Aspects Med 27:95–125
Cankar K, Stebih D, Dreo T et al (2006) Critical points of DNA quantification by real-time PCR-effects of DNA extraction method and sample matrix on quantification of genetically modified organisms. BMC Biotechnol 6:37–55
Sedlak RH, Jerome KR (2013) Viral diagnostics in the era of digital polymerase chain reaction. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 75:1–4
Sykes PJ, Neoh SH, Brisco MJ et al (1992) Quantitation of targets for PCR by use of limiting dilution. Biotechniques 13:444–449
Dube S, Qin J, Ramakrishnan R (2008) Mathematical analysis of copy number variation in a DNA sample using digital PCR on a nanofluidic device. PLoS One 3(8):e2876
Pekin D, Skhiri Y, Baret JC et al (2011) Quantitative and sensitive detection of rare mutations using droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 11:2156–2166
Huggett JF, Foy CA, Benes V (2013) The digital MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative digital PCR experiments. Clin Chem 59:892–902
Rački N, Morisset D, Gutierrez-Aguirre I et al (2014) One-step RT-droplet digital PCR: a breakthrough in the quantification of waterborne RNA viruses. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:661–667
Morisset D, Štebih D, Milavec M et al (2013) Quantitative analysis of food and feed samples with droplet digital PCR. PLoS One 8:e62583
Rački N, Dreo T, Gutierrez-Aguirre I, Blejec A, Ravnikar M (2014) Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR shows high resilience to PCR inhibitors from plant, soil and water samples. Plant Methods 10:42
Baker M (2012) Digital PCR hits its stride. Nat Methods 9:541–544
White RA, Quake SR, Curr K (2012) Digital PCR provides absolute quantitation of viral load for an occult RNA virus. J Virol Methods 179:45–50
Kiselinova M, Pasternak AO, De Spiegelaere W et al (2014) Comparison of droplet digital PCR and seminested real-time PCR for quantification of cell-associated HIV-1 RNA. PLoS One 9:e85999
Buchan BW, Ledeboer NA (2014) Emerging technologies for the clinical microbiology laboratory. Clin Microbiol Rev 27:783–822
Mehle N, Dreo T, Ravnikar M (2014) Quantitative analysis of “flavescence doreé” phytoplasma with droplet digital PCR. Phytopathogenic Mollicutes 4:9–15
Dreo T, Pirc M, Ramšak Z et al (2014) Optimising droplet digital PCR analysis approaches for detection and quantification of bacteria: a case study of fire blight and potato brown rot. Anal Bioanal Chem 406:6513–6528
Leibovitch EC, Brunetto GS, Caruso B et al (2014) Coinfection of human herpesviruses 6A (HHV-6A) and HHV-6B as demonstrated by novel digital droplet PCR assay. PLoS One 9:e92328
Kelley K, Cosman A, Belgrader P et al (2013) Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by a duplex droplet digital PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 51:2033–2039
Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, Mueller R, Nolan T, Pfaffl MW, Shipley GL et al (2009) The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem 55:611–622
Pirc M, Ravnikar M, Tomlinson J, Dreo T (2009) Improved fireblight diagnostics using quantitative real-time PCR detection of Erwinia amylovora chromosomal DNA. Plant Pathol 58:872–881
Yang R, Paparini A, Monis P et al (2014) Comparison of next-generation droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with quantitative PCR (qPCR) for enumeration of Cryptosporidium oocysts in faecal samples. Int J Parasitol. doi:10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.08.004
Sedlak RH, Kuypers J, Jerome KR (2014) A multiplexed droplet digital PCR assay performs better than qPCR on inhibition prone samples. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.09.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gutiérrez-Aguirre, I., Rački, N., Dreo, T., Ravnikar, M. (2015). Droplet Digital PCR for Absolute Quantification of Pathogens. In: Lacomme, C. (eds) Plant Pathology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1302. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2620-6_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2620-6_24
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2619-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2620-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols