Abstract
Abnormalities in the initiation and propagation of cardiac impulses result in a variety of arrhythmias. The cardiac action potential consists of five phases that are determined by channels that allow ions to flow passively down their electrochemical gradients, as well as by a series of energy-dependent ion pumps, thereby leading to cardiac contraction.
Sodium, potassium, calcium, and chloride ions are principally responsible for the membrane potential (phase 4). Phase 0 marks the initiation of the action potential. In nodal cells, the pacemaker current, If, initiates each cycle. In “nonpacemaker” tissue, If is absent. In these cells, phase 0 is triggered when the cell membrane is depolarized by adjacent cells. Phase 1 consists of rapid membrane repolarization. This is achieved by inactivation of the inward Na+ current and activation of a transient outward current, Ito. Phase 2, the plateau phase, is characterized by a small change in membrane potential generated by the L-type calcium channel, ICa–L. Rapid repolarization of the cell occurs during phase 3. ICa–L is inactivated in a time-dependent fashion, thus decreasing the flow of cations into the cell, while several outward potassium currents become active. This results in a net outward positive current and a negative transmembrane potential.
The mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias can be divided into three categories: (1) abnormal or enhanced automaticity, (2) triggered activity, and (3) reentry. This chapter reviews each of these mechanisms, along with the common clinical correlates of each.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Structural Heart Disease
- Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
- Accessory Pathway
- Slow Pathway
- Reentrant Tachycardia
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
In order to understand the pathophysiology of cardiac arrhythmias, one must have a grasp of the normal cardiac cycle, which is initiated by electrical events that precede cardiac contraction. Abnormalities in the initiation and propagation of cardiac impulses result in a variety of arrhythmias. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the cellular mechanisms responsible for normal impulse formation and conduction and to review the clinical consequences when these mechanisms are perturbed.
Cellular Electrophysiology: The Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential consists of five phases (phases 0 through 4) that are determined by channels that allow ions to flow passively down their electrochemical gradients, as well as by a series of energy-dependent ion pumps. Ion channels are protein “tunnels” that span the cell’s lipid membrane. By selectively permitting the passage of specific ions, they maintain the electrochemical cell membrane potential. Flow of a specific ion through a channel is dependent on gating of the channel as well as the electrical and chemical concentration gradients of that particular ion. Ions will flow passively down a chemical gradient if the channel is gated open and will also be drawn toward their opposite charge.
Sodium (Na+) and calcium (Ca2+) channels consist of a single α-subunit that contains six hydrophobic transmembrane regions (Fig. 15.1) [1]. The voltage-gated potassium (K+) channel consists of four identical subunits each containing a six-transmembrane-spanning unit similar to Na+ and Ca2+ channels. The six transmembrane units, S1–S6, form the core of the sodium, calcium, and most potassium channels.
Na+, K+, Ca2+, and chloride (Cl–) are principally responsible for the membrane potential (Fig. 15.2). It is helpful to recall the equilibrium potential of these ions when considering the cardiac action potential (Table 15.1). The positive and negative values reflect the intracellular potential relative to a reference electrode. When a single type of ion channel opens, the membrane potential will approach the equilibrium potential of that ion. Thus, during diastole (phase 4), the cell membrane is impermeable to Na+. However, K+ diffuses freely out of the cell until the concentration gradient is balanced by the negative intracellular potential that attracts K+. This balance represents the potassium electrochemical equilibrium potential (EK). During phase 0, when the cell membrane is freely permeable to Na+, the membrane potential approaches +50 mV (Fig. 15.3) [2]. Typically, more than one channel type is open at a time. The resulting membrane potential is determined by the balance of the competing currents.
Phase 0 marks the initiation of the action potential. Nodal cells are characterized by an influx of Ca2+, while atrial, ventricular, and His–Purkinje cells depend on an influx of Na+. Initiation of each cardiac cycle is dependent on membrane depolarization initiated at the sinus node. In nodal cells, the pacemaker current, If, initiates each cycle. If is activated by the polarization of phase 4 and carries a nonselective inward current composed primarily of Na+ and K+ ions, as well as a small Ca2+ current. If causes slow depolarization of the nodal cell membranes during diastole until a threshold for firing is achieved. Following initial local membrane depolarization by If, the upstroke of the nodal action potential is completed by a slow inward calcium current. Two types of calcium currents are present: the predominant slowly inactivating, dihydropyridine-sensitive L current (ICa–L) and the rapidly inactivating T current (ICa–T; see Fig. 15.3 and Table 15.1). Local membrane depolarization is propagated to neighboring cells via gap junction channels.
In “nonpacemaker” tissue, If is absent. In these cells, phase 0 is triggered when the cell membrane is depolarized by adjacent cells. Once a sufficient proportion of a cell surface is depolarized and the cell reaches its activation threshold, the permeability of the cell surface membrane to INa is markedly increased, allowing Na+ to enter the cell and complete phase 0 depolarization. Blocking this inward current decreases the rate of change of the upstroke of the action potential (dV/dt) and slows conduction velocity.
Phase 1 consists of rapid membrane repolarization. This is achieved by inactivation of the inward Na+ current and activation of the transient outward current (Ito), which is comprised of two currents. Ito1 is a voltage-activated outward potassium current, and Ito2 is a calcium-activated chloride current. Phase 2, the plateau phase, may last as long as 100 ms and is characterized by a small change in membrane potential generated by ICa–L.
Rapid repolarization of the cell occurs during phase 3. ICa–L is inactivated in a time-dependent fashion, thus decreasing the flow of cations into the cell. Simultaneously, several outward potassium currents, known as the delayed slow (IKs), rapid (IKr), and ultrarapid (IKur) currents, become active. This results in a net outward positive current and a negative transmembrane potential.
Mechanisms of Arrhythmias
Automaticity
Rhythmic (pacemaker) activity is an inherent property of different cell types. There is a normal hierarchy in the frequency of the initiated action potentials, with the sinus node being the dominant pacemaker. Automaticity in the distal conduction system (or working myocardium) may compete with that in the sinus node on the basis of enhanced normal or abnormal automaticity.
Under pathologic conditions, a decrease in the resting membrane potential may occur, which can lead to spontaneous phase 4 depolarization in all cardiac cells [3]. Abnormal automaticity is defined as spontaneous impulse initiation in cells that are not fully polarized. The disturbances in the normal ionic balance leading to abnormal automaticity may result from perturbations in various currents, e.g., reduction in the inward rectifying current, IK1. During the subacute phase (24–72 h) following coronary occlusion, automatic arrhythmias can arise from the borders of the infarction.
Clinical Correlates
A representative clinical example of an automatic arrhythmia is atrial or ventricular tachycardia that is precipitated by exercise in patients without structural heart disease. These forms of tachycardia are thought to represent adrenergically mediated automaticity, because programmed stimulation can neither initiate nor terminate the arrhythmia, whereas the tachycardia can be induced with catecholamine stimulation and is sensitive to β-blockade (Table 15.2) [4, 5].
The cellular mechanism governing automatic arrhythmias and their anatomic substrate is poorly delineated. Catecholamines modulate the rate in automatic cells by increasing cyclic AMP (cAMP) synthesis and alter the kinetics of If such that it is activated at less negative membrane potentials [6]. Adenosine appears to attenuate If through an inhibition of cAMP synthesis, an antiadrenergic mechanism similar to that mediated by vagal stimulation [7].
Triggered Activity
In cardiac cells, oscillations of membrane potential that occur during or after the action potential are referred to as afterdepolarizations. They are generally divided into two subtypes: early and delayed afterdepolarizations (EADs and DADs, respectively; Fig. 15.4). When an afterdepolarization achieves sufficient amplitude and the threshold potential is reached, a new action potential is evoked; this is known as a triggered response. Under appropriate circumstances, this process may become iterative, resulting in a sustained triggered arrhythmia. Triggered activity differs fundamentally from abnormal automaticity in that abnormal automaticity occurs during phase 4 of the action potential and it depends on partial depolarization of the resting membrane potential.
Early Afterdepolarizations and Arrhythmogenesis
An EAD can appear during the plateau phase (phase 2) and/or repolarization (phase 3) of the action potential (Fig. 15.4). Distinction between phase 2 and phase 3 EADs is often based on the takeoff potential of the EAD, e.g., above −35 mV for the phase 2 and below −35 mV for the phase 3 EADs. It is possible for both forms of EADs to appear during the same action potential. A critical prolongation of repolarization, either by a reduction in outward currents, an increase in inward currents, or a combination of the two, is normally required for the manifestation of EAD-induced ectopic activity. EADs are often potentiated by bradycardia or a pause, which further prolongs repolarization, since action potential duration is dependent on the prior diastolic interval.
Clinical Correlates
A wide variety of medications can produce EADs, EAD-related triggered activity, or even a form of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia known as torsade de pointes (Fig. 15.5). These agents excessively prolong repolarization and include the Vaughan-Williams class Ia (e.g., quinidine and procainamide) and class III (e.g., sotalol, dofetilide, and ibutilide) antiarrhythmic agents, and a variety of noncardiac drugs, including antibiotics (e.g., erythromycin), pentamidine, and nonsedating antihistamines (e.g., terfenadine and astemizole).
One of the most extensively studied EAD-related arrhythmias is that found in patients with congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS). Initially thought to be a rare disease (1 per 10,000 births), more recent estimates demonstrate a much higher prevalence (1 per 2,500 births) [8]. LQTS provides an opportunity to examine the effects of ion-channel mutations on structure and function of these channels.
Two distinct phenotypes of congenital long-QT syndrome were initially recognized. In 1957 Jervell and Lange-Nielsen described the autosomal recessive pattern of the congenital long-QT syndrome associated with congenital sensorineural hearing loss and recurrent syncope [9], and in 1963, an autosomal dominant form of the disease manifesting only as QT prolongation was described separately by Romano et al. and Ward [10, 11]. Genotyping has now revealed 13 disease-causing genes for the long-QT syndrome [12].
Certain clinical features appear to be common to most forms of the congenital long-QT syndrome. Most patients will have a corrected QT interval (QTc) of 460 ms or greater [13], although some LQTS patients can have a normal QTc. The standard heart rate correction, according to Bazett’s formula, is QTc = QT/RR1/2, where RR is the R–R interval expressed in seconds. Initially, a scoring system was developed and was used to assist in the diagnosis of the long-QT syndrome and took into account factors including the QT interval, patient symptoms, and family history [14]. The syndrome appears to be equally distributed between men and women.
Genetic testing for LQTS is currently available and is recommended for any patient in whom there is a strong clinical index of suspicion for LQTS (based on clinical history, family history, electrocardiogram, and/or provocative stress testing) or for any asymptomatic patient with QT prolongation in the absence of other clinical conditions that might prolong the QT interval. Furthermore, mutation-specific genetic testing is recommended for family members (and other appropriate relatives) following identification of the LQTS-causing mutation in an index case [15]. Known mutations account for about 75 % of those diagnosed with LQTS. LQT1 accounts for approximately 30–35 % of LQTS cases. The responsible gene is located on the short arm of chromosome 11 and encodes the pore forming the α-subunit (one of the two proteins) that comprise IKs, the slowly activating delayed rectifier current. The defective IKs is inactive, thus prolonging repolarization and predisposing to EADs.
Mutations in the gene encoding IKr (HERG) on chromosome 7, which result in prolonged phase 3 repolarization, appear to be responsible for another autosomal recessive form of the long-QT syndrome, LQT2, and account for another 25–40 % of LQTS patients.
LQT3 has been linked to SCN5A, a gene on chromosome 3 that encodes INa, the current responsible for phase 0 rapid depolarization. LQT3 results from a sodium channel that fails to inactivate appropriately and is present in 5–10 % of LQTS cases. This mutation causes continued inward sodium current (beyond phase 0) throughout the action potential, thereby prolonging the action potential duration. Mexiletine, a selective Na+ channel blocker, has been demonstrated to shorten the QTc in affected patients and may therefore have a therapeutic role.
Less common mutations include LQT4 (ankyrin B), located on chromosome 4, which causes disruption in the cellular organization of the Na+ pump, the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, and the inositol triphosphate receptor; extrasystoles are caused by altered Ca2+ signaling. In addition, the β-subunit of IKs and IKr are encoded by KCNE1 and KCNE2 (both on chromosome 21), and mutations in these genes can also result in prolonged QTc due to delayed repolarization (LQT5 and LQT6, respectively). LQT7 is caused by the mutant gene KCNJ2, which decreases the inwardly rectifying K+ current (IKir2.1).
Mutations in one allele of either the α- or β-subunit of IKs appear to be phenotypically expressed as the Romano–Ward syndrome. Both subunits have been demonstrated to be present in the stria vascularis of the inner ear in mice. Mutations in both alleles (i.e., homozygotes) for the α- or β-subunit are associated with the Jervell and Lange-Nielsen phenotype.
Delayed Afterdepolarizations and Arrhythmogenesis
Delayed afterdepolarizations (DADs) are oscillations in membrane potential that occur after repolarization and during phase 4 of the action potential. In contrast to automatic rhythms that originate de novo during spontaneous diastolic depolarization, DADs are dependent on the preceding action potential. By definition, they do not occur in the absence of a previous action potential.
During the plateau phase of the normal action potential, Ca2+ enters the cell. The increase in intracellular Ca2+ triggers release of Ca2+ from the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR); this, in turn, further elevates intracellular calcium and initiates contraction. Relaxation occurs through sequestration of Ca2+ by the SR. DADs arise when the cytosol becomes overloaded with Ca2+ and triggers ITi, a transient inward current (Fig. 15.6). ITi is generated by the Na+–Ca2+ exchanger (INaCa) and/or a nonspecific Ca2+-activated current [16, 17]. DADs can originate from Purkinje fibers, as well as from myocardial, mitral valve, and coronary sinus tissues. Rapid pacing potentiates DADs because more Na+ (and Ca2+) enters the cell during rapid depolarization, further loading the cell with Ca2+. Most experimental studies on triggered activity were performed under conditions of digoxin excess. By blocking the Na+/K+ pump, digoxin causes increased concentration of intracellular Na+. The high concentration of Na+ stimulates the electrogenic Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, which moves Na+ out of the cell in exchange for allowing Ca2+ entry into the cytosol. This results in intracellular Ca2+ overload and DADs. β-adrenergic stimulation, the effects of which are mediated by an increase in intracellular cAMP, also provokes delayed afterdepolarizations by increasing the inward Ca2+ current.
Clinical Correlates
The prototypical clinical arrhythmia due to cAMP-mediated triggered activity (DAD dependent) is idiopathic ventricular tachycardia arising from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) [18] and is usually characterized by paroxysmal stress-induced VT or repetitive monomorphic VT (RMVT) [19, 20]. RMVT occurs during rest and is characterized by frequent ventricular extrasystoles, ventricular couplets, and salvos of nonsustained VT with intervening sinus rhythm. In contrast, paroxysmal stress-induced VT usually occurs during exercise or emotional stress and is a sustained arrhythmia. Common to both groups are the absence of structural heart disease, similar tachycardia morphology (left bundle branch block, inferior axis), and similar site of origin (RVOT), although the tachycardia can occasionally originate from other right ventricular sites as well as the left ventricle, especially from near the left and right coronary cusps of the sinuses of Valsalva [20, 21]. Overlap between these phenotypes of VT can be considerable.
Since activation of adenylyl cyclase and ICa–L is critical for the development of cAMP-mediated triggered activity, the triggered arrhythmia would be expected to be sensitive to many electrical and pharmacological stimuli, including β-blockade, calcium channel blockade (verapamil), vagal maneuvers, and adenosine (Table 15.2; Fig. 15.7). Termination of VT with adenosine is thought to be a specific response for identifying cAMP-mediated triggered activity due to DADs, since adenosine has no ventricular electrophysiologic effect in the absence of β-adrenergic stimulation and has no effect on digoxin-induced DADs or quinidine-induced EADs. Furthermore, adenosine has no effect on catecholamine-facilitated reentry that is due to structural heart disease [22]. The clinical effects of adenosine and verapamil in a patient with VT attributed to cAMP-mediated triggered activity are shown in Fig. 15.8 [19]. While calcium blockers may be helpful in the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory in determining the mechanism of a specific arrhythmia (Table 15.2), their use is contraindicated in the treatment of most clinical forms of ventricular tachycardia.
Another arrhythmia that is likely due to triggered activity and delayed afterdepolarizations is catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT). CPVT also occurs in patients with no evidence of structural heart disease, who present with a distinctive pattern of stress-related, bidirectional VT, or polymorphic VT. Mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (RyR2) and calsequestrin 2 have been linked to CPVT [23–25]. RyR2 is responsible for calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum, in response to calcium entry from the voltage-dependent L-type calcium channels (i.e., calcium-induced calcium release). Calsequestrin provides a calcium reservoir in the sarcoplasmic reticulum and possibly serves as a luminal Ca2+ sensor for the ryanodine receptor. Malfunction in either of these genes can result in intracellular calcium overload.
Reentry
The normal cardiac impulse follows a predetermined path. It is initiated at the sinus node and is extinguished after it has activated the ventricles. Reentrant arrhythmias arise when the cardiac impulse circulates around an anatomic or functional obstacle initiating an independent, repetitive rhythm. Reentry may be broadly classified as being either anatomic or functional.
Anatomic Reentry
In the anatomic model of reentrant arrhythmias, four prerequisites must be met to initiate reentry (Fig. 15.9): (1) a predetermined anatomic circuit must exist; (2) unidirectional block (e.g., in response to an extrastimulus) must occur in one limb of the reentrant circuit; (3) slow conduction in a contiguous pathway of the circuit, allowing recovery of excitability of the previously refractory limb; and (4) the wavelength of the impulse must be shorter than the length of the circuit [26, 27]. An illustration of some of these principles is shown in Fig. 15.9a, where an impulse “blocks” in the β pathway and travels down the α pathway slowly, but not with sufficient delay to allow resolution of refractoriness in the β pathway. Therefore, the retrograde impulse is extinguished. In Fig. 15.9b, conduction proceeds anterogradely down the α pathway and then subsequently retrogradely up the β pathway, which is no longer refractory. This results in reentry.
The concept of wavelength is inherent in the anatomical model of reentry. The leading edge of the wave must encounter excitable tissue in which to propagate. Therefore, the rotation time around the reentrant circuit must be longer than the recovery period of all segments of the circuit, and the length of the circuit must exceed the product of the conduction velocity and the recovery period of the tissue (Fig. 15.10a). Interruption of the anatomical circuit at any point interrupts reentry.
Functional Reentry
The mechanism of many atrial or ventricular reentrant arrhythmias may be more complex than just anatomical reentry. It has become apparent that reentry may be sustained even in the absence of a specific anatomical circuit and in the absence of abnormal myocardium. This type of reentry is termed functional.
The leading circle hypothesis of reentry accounts for reentry in the absence of an anatomic obstacle [26]. Reentry follows the smallest possible circuit with tissue at the vortex remaining unexcitable (Fig. 15.10b). The propagating wave must penetrate tissue that remains relatively refractory. Thus, the circuit is much smaller than the circuit in anatomical reentry and no portion of the circuit is ever fully recovered (i.e., there is no excitable gap). It is unclear whether leading circle reentry is responsible for clinical arrhythmias.
Propagation of impulses in cardiac tissue is dependent on myocyte fiber orientation. Cell-to-cell communication depends primarily on gap junction proteins that are unequally distributed along the cell surface. The greater density of gap junction proteins along the longitudinal axis (as compared with the transverse axis) accounts for more rapid conduction in this direction. However, the longitudinal axis is associated with a lower safety factor of conduction (i.e., longer refractory period). The differential conduction properties in the longitudinal and transverse directions provide a substrate for anisotropic reentry. Anisotropy may account in part for some arrhythmias in the atria, AV node, and the peri-infarct regions of myocardium [28].
Figure-eight reentry may be considered an “extension” of leading circle reentry (that also incorporates anatomic reentry and anisotropic conduction properties), in which two reentrant circuits rotate in opposite directions in close proximity to one another utilizing a central common pathway (Fig. 15.10c). This mechanism may underlie sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia observed in some patients with ischemic heart disease. Unlike other forms of functional reentry, figure-of-eight reentry depends on a central common pathway between the rotating reentrant waves that is delimited by unexcitable tissue. Disruption of this central pathway effectively terminates reentry.
Spiral waves represent the most complex form of functional reentry and are believed to be a possible underlying mechanism for some forms of atrial and ventricular fibrillation (Fig. 15.11). In its simplest form, spiral wave reentry may be depicted as a broken wave front that curls at its broken end and begins to rotate (Fig. 15.12) [26]. The wave propagates through cardiac muscle but is interrupted by an obstacle such as a scar. When the obstacle causes a break in the wave front, several outcomes are possible depending on the excitability of the tissue. When excitability is high after passing the obstacle, the broken ends will fuse rapidly. When excitability is lower, the broken ends cannot fuse but begin to spiral. The trajectory of each point on the wave varies according to the curvature of the wave: the greater the curvature, the slower the conduction velocity. The variable excitability of cardiac muscle compounds the complexity of propagation. When excitability of the tissue is further reduced, propagation of the wave front is extinguished.
Finally, reentry may occur in a linear circuit in the absence of even a functional loop (Fig. 15.13). An example of this form of reentry, termed reflection, may be seen when local injury occurs over a short portion of the His–Purkinje fibers. In this model, reentry occurs over a single pathway and depends on the presence of a region of severely impaired (but not blocked) conduction [26]. The impulse propagates toward the region of depressed conduction, but the damaged cells are incapable of being excited and the action potential is unable to propagate further. However, a small current is generated across these cells, and if the distance across the gap is relatively small, current may reach the distal segment and bring those cells to threshold, where propagation of an action potential can be initiated. If there is sufficient delay in propagation of the current to the distal side of the gap, the distal action potential may be reflected backward across the gap, reinitiating (or reflecting) an action potential.
Clinical Correlates
Most clinical supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias are due to reentry. In this section, we describe the most common reentrant arrhythmias. The surface electrocardiogram (ECG) provides important clues to the mechanism of reentrant tachycardias (Fig. 15.14). Supraventricular tachycardias due to AV node reentry or an accessory AV pathway will typically have a short RP’ interval (i.e., the interval between the P wave on surface ECG and the preceding R wave, denoted as the RP’ interval <50 % of the RR interval). Conversely, supraventricular tachycardias such as atrial tachycardias, the atypical form of AV node reentry (discussed below), and the permanent form of junctional reciprocating tachycardia (a reentrant SVT due to a slowly conducting retrograde accessory pathway) typically demonstrate a long RP’ interval (<50 % of the RR interval). When evaluating wide complex tachycardia, dissociation of the surface ECG P waves from the QRS complexes supports the diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (Fig. 15.15). However, a 1:1 relationship between the P waves and QRS complexes may be observed in ventricular tachycardia (with 1:1 retrograde ventricular-to-atrial conduction) or supraventricular tachycardia conducted with a wide QRS complex.
Intra-Atrial Reentry
Intra-atrial reentrant tachycardias comprise a diverse group of arrhythmias. Reentrant arrhythmias may occur anywhere in the atria and may affect persons with or without structural heart disease. Because areas of scar tissue typically provide the substrate for reentry, these tachycardias have been called incisional reentrant tachycardias [29]. Another common form of intra-atrial reentry is atrial flutter (Fig. 15.16). The “typical” form of atrial flutter occurs at a remarkably consistent rate of 250–300 beats per minute with propagation in counterclockwise fashion around the tricuspid valve annulus, down the free wall of the right atrium, and up the interatrial septum. When conduction proceeds up the interatrial septum, the caudal–cranial activation inscribes the superiorly directed flutter waves (i.e., negative in the inferior leads) observed on the surface ECG. Clockwise right atrial flutter (in the opposite direction) is less common.
Most intra-atrial reentrant tachycardias are not responsive to adenosine, β-blockers, or calcium channel blockers [5]. Over the past decade, electrophysiologists have made substantial progress in mapping and ablating reentrant atrial tachycardias. As with all reentrant arrhythmias, disruption of any part of the circuit will terminate tachycardia. For example, both the typical and atypical forms of flutter depend on a critical isthmus of conduction at the base of the right atrium. Creating a linear ablation lesion extending from the tricuspid valve annulus to the inferior vena cava blocks conduction across this isthmus and effectively eliminates tachycardia.
Atrioventricular (AV) Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia
Excluding atrial flutter and fibrillation, typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia is the single most common form of supraventricular tachycardia and accounts for nearly 50–60 % of all sustained SVTs in adults [30, 31]. Usually, it presents before age 40, with rates typically ranging from 160 to 200 beats per minute but may vary (from 100 to 300 beats per minute). The reentrant circuit is limited to the peri-AV nodal region, with anterograde conduction proceeding over a “slow” pathway and retrograde conduction traversing a “fast” pathway [32]. In the usual case, the fast pathway has a longer refractory period than the slow pathway. Therefore, initiation of reentry occurs when a premature atrial beat blocks in the fast pathway and is conducted over the slow pathway. By the time the impulse reaches the distal portion of the slow pathway, the retrograde fast pathway has regained excitability and is able to conduct the impulse to the atrium, perpetuating the arrhythmia by engaging and activating the slow anterograde pathway. The atypical form of AV nodal reentry activates these limbs in the opposite direction; anterograde conduction proceeds over the fast pathway and retrograde conduction across the slow pathway (Fig. 15.17). As one would predict, the typical form of AV nodal reentry (with retrograde conduction up the fast pathway) is characterized by a short RP’ interval on the surface ECG, while atypical AV nodal reentry inscribes a long RP’ interval. An electrophysiologic hallmark of AV nodal reentry is that neither the atria nor ventricles are necessary parts of the reentrant circuit.
Adenosine is effective in terminating reentrant tachycardias that involve the AV node and is mediated by activation of the outward potassium current IK(Ado, ACh), which hyperpolarizes the AV node to about −90 mV and abbreviates the action potential. Adenosine can terminate tachycardia in either limb, but it occurs most often in the slow pathway [33, 34]. Vagal maneuvers (carotid sinus massage or Valsalva) also terminate AV nodal-dependent reentry by activating the same outward potassium current IK(Ado, ACh).
The slow pathway is located in the region of the posteroseptal space of the interatrial septum and is readily amenable to ablation (>95 % success rate; Fig. 15.18) [35, 36]. This location, remote from the compact AV node, minimizes the chance of AV node damage during ablation. Ablation of the fast pathway also effectively treats AV nodal reentry but carries a relatively high risk of complete heart block.
Atrioventricular Reciprocating Tachycardia
Reentrant arrhythmias utilizing an accessory AV connection comprise the second most common form of regular narrow complex tachycardias (approximately 35 % of SVTs). Accessory pathways are composed of muscular bridges along the tricuspid and mitral valve annuli that provide an abnormal electrical connection between the atria and ventricles. The electrophysiologic properties of most accessory pathways resemble those of normal atrial tissue. Because the resting membrane potential is approximately −90 mV, typically, accessory pathways are insensitive to vagal maneuvers, adenosine, and Ca2+ channel blockers.
Most accessory pathways conduct only in one direction—retrogradely from the ventricles to the atria—and are therefore concealed during sinus rhythm. Conversely, accessory pathways with anterograde conduction properties usually result in ventricular preexcitation (known as Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome). During sinus rhythm, conduction proceeds simultaneously down the AV node and accessory pathway (Fig. 15.19). Preexcitation of the ventricles by the accessory pathway inscribes a delta wave visible on the surface ECG that prolongs the QRS complex. Typically, the PR interval is abbreviated (<120 ms) owing to rapid conduction over the accessory pathway. Orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (anterograde conduction over the AV node and retrograde conduction across the accessory pathway) accounts for 90 % of reentrant arrhythmias in patients with Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. This arrhythmia may degenerate into atrial fibrillation, which may precipitate ventricular fibrillation because of rapid conduction over the accessory pathway. A less common arrhythmia, antidromic reciprocating tachycardia (the anterograde limb being the accessory pathway and the retrograde limb being the AV node), is a regular rhythm and inscribes a wide QRS complex on the surface ECG.
Ventricular Reentrant Arrhythmias
Most ventricular arrhythmias occur in patients with a prior history of myocardial infarction. Experimental evidence suggests that mechanism of the tachycardia may be dependent on the time of the infarct. Within the first 30–60 min (early phase) following an acute myocardial infarction, the intracellular and extracellular milieux appear to favor reentrant ventricular arrhythmias, as does autonomic tone [37]. Automatic idioventricular rhythms, with rates typically between 60 and 120 beats per minute, are usually observed within the first 6–10 h (delayed phase). After the relatively quiescent second phase, the third and final stage of ventricular arrhythmias (late phase) begins within 48–72 h after infarct and is characterized by rapid monomorphic tachycardias, owing to reentry arising in the peri-infarct border zone. Inhomogeneous conduction properties of the peri-infarction tissue create regions of slow and rapid conduction, causing anisotropic and figure-of-eight reentry. The risk of reentrant late-phase ventricular arrhythmias persists indefinitely following myocardial infarction and is thought to account for at least half of all deaths among myocardial infarction survivors. Electrophysiologic studies and endocardial mapping in humans have demonstrated that monomorphic VT that occurs late after a myocardial infarction is caused by areas of slow conduction and diastolic activation. These arrhythmias may be induced or terminated with pacing maneuvers.
Another example of reentrant ventricular tachycardia occurring in patients with heart disease is bundle branch reentrant VT. This example of anatomic reentry is usually observed in patients with diseased His–Purkinje system function, complete or incomplete left bundle branch block during sinus rhythm, and a nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. The incidence of bundle branch reentry as the cause of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia ranges from less than 1 to 6 % [38]; this form of VT most often has a left bundle branch block, left superior axis morphology. It is typically initiated by a ventricular premature beat that follows a pause. The premature impulse blocks in the retrograde direction within the right bundle but conducts transseptally to retrogradely activate the left bundle. When the impulse reaches the His bundle, it is able to engage the right bundle in the anterograde direction and then continues back to the left bundle (Fig. 15.20). It is important to recognize this form of tachycardia since it is readily curable by radiofrequency catheter ablation of the right bundle.
Functional reentry may be responsible for the initiation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with Brugada syndrome, although some data suggest an alternative mechanism [39]. These patients, first described in 1992 [40], present with an ECG pattern of right bundle branch block, right precordial downsloping ST segment elevation (leads V1–V3) with a normal QTc interval, and have no evidence of structural heart disease. ST segment elevation is due to relatively early epicardial repolarization with respect to the endocardium and results from greater expression Ito and Iks in the epicardium. There is evidence that Brugada syndrome is a primary electrical disease, and in some families it has been linked to mutations causing loss of function in a sodium channel (SCN5A) [41]. This results in an outward shift of the balance of current at the end of phase 1 of the action potential, leading to the loss of the action potential dome, preferentially in the epicardial layer. The subsequent abbreviation of the action potential at some epicardial sites leads to the substrate for phase 2 reentry. Phase 2 reentry has been studied in a canine model of simulated ischemia, where loss of epicardial action potential dome (after exposure to a K+ channel opener) gives rise to ST-segment elevation (Fig. 15.21) [42].
References
Ackerman MJ, Clapham DE. Ion channels—basic science and clinical disease. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1575–86.
Ackerman MJ, Clapham DE. Normal cardiac electrophysiology. In: Chien K, editor. Molecular basis of cardiovascular disease. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1999. p. 281–301.
Surawicz B. Normal and abnormal automaticity. In: Rosen MR, Janse MJ, Wit AL, editors. Cardiac electrophysiology: a textbook. Mount Kisco: Futura Publishing; 1990. p. 159–73.
Lerman BB, Stein KM, Markowitz SM. Adenosine-sensitive ventricular tachycardia: a conceptual approach. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:559–69.
Markowitz SM, Stein KM, Mittal S, et al. Differential effects of adenosine on focal and macroreentrant atrial tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:489–502.
DiFrancesco D, Angoni M, Maccaferri G. The pacemaker current in cardiac cells. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1995. p. 96–103.
Lerman BB. Response of nonreentrant catecholamine-mediated ventricular tachycardia to endogenous adenosine and acetylcholine. Evidence for myocardial receptor-mediated effects. Circulation. 1993;87:382–90.
Schwartz PJ, Stramba-Badiale M, Crotti L, et al. Prevalence of the congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2009;120:1761–7.
Jervell A, Lange-Nielsen F. Congenital deaf-mutism, functional heart disease with prolongation of the QT interval, and sudden death. Am Heart J. 1957;54:59–68.
Romano C, Gemme G, Pongiglione R. Aritmie cardiache rare dell’eta’pediatrica. II. Accessi sincopali per fibrillazione ventricolare parossistica. Clin Pediatr (Bologna). 1963;45:656–83.
Ward OC. A new familial cardiac syndrome in children. J Ir Med Assoc. 1964;54:103–6.
Yang Y, Yang Y, Liang B, et al. Identification of a Kir3.4 mutation in congenital long QT syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;86:872–80.
Keating MT. The long QT syndrome: a review of recent molecular genetic and physiologic discoveries. Medicine. 1996;75:1–5.
Schwartz PJ, Moss AJ, Vincent GM, et al. Diagnostic criteria for the long QT syndrome. An update. Circulation. 1993;88:782–4.
Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1308–39.
Luo CH, Rudy Y. A dynamic model of the cardiac ventricular action potential. II. Afterdepolarizations, triggered activity, and potentiation. Circ Res. 1994;74:1097–113.
Han X, Ferrier GR. Contribution of Na+-Ca2+ exchange to stimulation of transient inward current by isoproterenol in rabbit cardiac Purkinje fibers. Circ Res. 1995;76:664–74.
Lerman BB, Belardinelli L, West GA, et al. Adenosine-sensitive ventricular tachycardia: evidence suggesting cyclic AMP-mediated triggered activity. Circulation. 1986;74:270–80.
Lerman BB, Stein K, Engelstein ED, et al. Mechanism of repetitive monomorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1995;92:421–9.
Iwai S, Cantillon DJ, Kim RJ, et al. Right and left ventricular outflow tract tachycardias: evidence for a common electrophysiologic mechanism. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:1052–8.
Lerman BB, Stein KM, Markowitz SM. Mechanisms of idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:571–83.
Lerman BB, Stein KM, Markowitz SM, et al. Catecholamine-facilitated reentrant ventricular tachycardia: uncoupling of adenosine’s antiadrenergic effects. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10:17–26.
Priori SG, Napolitano CN, Tiso N, et al. Mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (hRyR2) underlie catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2001;103:196–200.
Laitinen PJ, Brown DM, Piippo K, et al. Mutations of the cardiac ryanodine receptor (RyR2) gene in familial polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2001;103:485–90.
Laitinen PJ, Swan H, Kontula K. Molecular genetics of exercise-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: identification of three novel cardiac ryanodine receptor mutations and two common calsequestrin 2 amino-acid polymorphisms. Eur J Hum Genet. 2003;11:888–91.
Jalife J, Delmar M, Davidenko J, et al. Basic cardiac electrophysiology for the clinician. Armonk: Futura Publishing; 1999.
Prystowsky EN, Klein GJ. Mechanism of tachycardia. In: Prystowsky E, Klein G, editors. Cardiac arrhythmias: an integrated approach for the clinician. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994. p. 81–95.
Spach MS, Dolber PC, Heidlage JF. Influence of the passive anisotropic properties on directional differences in propagation following modification of the sodium conductance in human atrial muscle. A model of reentry based on anisotropic discontinuous propagation. Circ Res. 1988;62:811–32.
Lesh MD, Kalman JM. To fumble flutter or tackle “tach”? Toward updated classifiers for atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1996;7:460–6.
Josephson ME, Kastor JA. Supraventricular tachycardia: mechanisms and management. Ann Intern Med. 1977;87:346–58.
Wu D, Denes P. Mechanisms of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Arch Intern Med. 1975;135:437–42.
Benditt D, Reyes W, Gornick C, et al. Supraventricular tachycardias: recognition and treatment. In: Naccarelli G, editor. Cardiac arrhythmias: a practical approach. Mount Kisco: Futura; 1991. p. 135–76.
DiMarco JP, Sellers TD, Lerman BB, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic use of adenosine in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;6:417–25.
Lerman BB, Greenberg M, Overholt ED, et al. Differential electrophysiologic properties of decremental retrograde pathways in long RP’ tachycardia. Circulation. 1987;76:21–31.
Calkins H, Yong P, Miller JM, et al. Catheter ablation of accessory pathways, atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, and the atrioventricular junction: final results of a prospective, multicenter clinical trial. Circulation. 1999;99:262–70.
Kalbfleisch SJ, Morady F. Catheter ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. In: Zipes D, Jalife J, editors. Cardiac electrophysiology: from cell to bedside. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1995. p. 1477.
Scherlag BJ, El-Sherif N, Hope R, et al. Characterization and localization of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction. Circ Res. 1974;35:372–83.
Caceres J, Jazayeri M, McKinnie J, et al. Sustained bundle branch reentry as a mechanism of clinical tachycardia. Circulation. 1989;79:256–70.
Nademanee K, Veerakul G, Chandanamattha P, Chaothawee L, Ariyachaipanich A, Jirasirirojanakorn K, et al. Prevention of ventricular fibrillation episodes in Brugada syndrome by catheter ablation over the anterior right ventricular outflow tract epicardium. Circulation. 2011;123:1270–12709.
Brugada P, Brugada J. Right bundle branch block, persistent ST segment elevation and sudden cardiac death: a distinct clinical and electrocardiographic syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:1391–6.
Chen Q, Kirsch G, Zhang D, et al. Genetic basis and molecular mechanism for idiopathic ventricular fibrillation. Nature. 1998;392:293–6.
Yan G, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the Brugada syndrome and other mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis associated with ST-segment elevation. Circulation. 1999;100:1660–6.
Recommended Reading
Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, et al. HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8:1308–39.
Jalife J, Delmar M, Davidenko J, et al. Basic cardiac electrophysiology for the clinician. Armonk: Futura Publishing; 1999.
Lerman BB, Stein KM, Markowitz SM, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias in normal hearts. Cardiol Clin. 2000;18:265–91.
Priori SG, Napolitano CN, Tiso N, et al. Mutations in the cardiac ryanodine receptor gene (hRyR2) underlie catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 2001;103:196–200.
Yan G, Antzelevitch C. Cellular basis for the Brugada syndrome and other mechanisms of arrhythmogenesis associated with ST-segment elevation. Circulation. 1999;100:1660–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Iwai, S., Markowitz, S.M., Lerman, B.B. (2013). Electrophysiology of Cardiac Arrhythmias. In: Rosendorff, C. (eds) Essential Cardiology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6705-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6705-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-6704-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-6705-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)