Abstract
Laser hair removal is one of the most common non-surgical procedures performed in the United States. Excessive, unwanted hair can be seen in all ages, ethnicities and skin types and lasers can help provide a permanent reduction in hair growth. Professional and home-based laser and light systems are both currently available, with professional systems including the 694 nm ruby laser, 755 nm Alexandrite laser, the 800 nm diode laser, the long-pulsed 1,064 nm Neodymium doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, intense pulsed light (IPL), and radiofrequency. While generally safe, side effects from laser hair removal are possible and should only be used by trained medical professionals after performing a thorough history and physical examination. This chapter will provide a succinct approach to laser hair removal, including but not limited to available modalities, patient selection, reported side effects and management of care.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
-
Laser hair removal is one of the most common non-surgical procedures performed in the United States.
-
Professional and home-based laser and light systems are both currently available. Professional laser and light systems for hair removal include the: 694 nm ruby laser, 755 nm Alexandrite laser, the 800 nm diode laser, the 1,064 nm Neodymium doped: yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser, intense pulsed light (IPL), and radiofrequency. In the United States, home-based systems include only diode and IPL systems [1].
-
Excessive, unwanted hair can be seen in all ages, ethnicities and skin types.
-
Laser hair removal results in a permanent reduction in hair growth and not total permanent hair loss.
-
A complete, but temporary hair loss can be seen for 1–3 months after treatment. Hair re-growth after laser hair removal may be finer and fairer, more closely resembling velus hair. This may change over time, ultimately appearing akin to terminal hair.
-
Laser hair removal functions on the principle of selective photothermolysis, with melanin serving as the target chromophore [2]. This increases the incidence of side effects in patients with darker Fitzpatrick skin types.
-
Laser hair removal of white, blonde or red hairs is generally ineffective due to decreased quantities of eumelanin (dark melanin) [3].
-
Aside from general cosmesis, laser hair removal may also help to improve the untoward effects from conditions such as pseudofolliculitis barbae and acne keloidalis nuchae [4].
-
Paradoxical hypertrichosis is an uncommon, yet possible side effect with a reported incidence between 0.05 and 10.2 % [5–8].
Background
Long-Pulsed 694 nm Ruby Laser
-
The long-pulsed 694 nm Ruby laser is the oldest laser used for hair removal.
-
In patients with fair skin and dark course hair, it is highly effective with few side effects [9].
-
Due to its highly selective targeting of melanin, it is not recommended for patients with greater than Fitzpatrick type III skin or patients with recent sun exposure. For this reason, it has fallen out of favor.
755 nm Alexandrite Laser
-
Synthetic alexandrite crystal is used to emit energy at 755 nm wavelength, corresponding to the middle of the melanin absorption spectrum.
-
The 755 nm Alexandrite laser typically has a larger spot size and higher repetition rate than 694 nm Ruby laser.
-
The longer wavelength of the 755 nm laser results in slightly deeper penetration and avoidance of epidermal melanin when compared to the long-pulsed 694 nm Ruby laser, yet is still not ideal for darker skin types.
800 nm Diode Laser
-
Like the 755 nm Alexandrite, the 800 nm diode produces light in the middle of the melanin absorption spectrum, with greater depth penetration than the 694 nm Ruby and 755 nm Alexandrite lasers.
-
It has been suggested that lower fluences with either longer pulse durations or higher repetition rates may help when treating ethnic skin in order to avoid epidermal damage, however it is not the wavelength of choice for darker skin [10].
1,064 nm Long-Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser
-
The 1,064 nm Nd:YAG possesses the single deepest-penetrating wavelength of all the laser systems used for hair removal.
-
When compared to other available wavelengths, due to its deeper penetration, as well as the fact that the 1,064 nm wavelength is on the tail end of the melanin absorption spectrum, it is more effective in bypassing epidermal melanin absorption.
-
For this reason, this wavelength may cause fewer side effects when treating Fitzpatrick skin phenotypes IV–VI, but is generally less effective [11, 12].
IPL (515–1,200 nm)
-
IPL systems emit broadband non-coherent light, targeting chromophores such as water and hemoglobin, in addition to melanin.
-
Its larger spot size (120–450 mm2) allows it to treat large areas such as the back or chest.
-
Due to their broad emission spectrum, and thus decreased selectivity, efficacy and side effect rates may be extremely varied.
-
Spectra may be tailored with the addition of optical filters [13].
Q-Switched Nd:YAG Lasers
-
Q-switched, as opposed to long-pulsed, delivers energy through an aperture-like device, maximizing energy and peak power with a short pulse duration (nanosecond range).
-
Efficacy for this form of delivery is varied as some authors suggest the pulse duration is too short to properly heat the target hair follicle [14]. Others report moderate efficacy with high patient satisfaction [15, 16]. The long-pulsed Nd: YAG is nonetheless more commonly used.
-
The Q-switched 1,064 nm Nd:YAG has also been shown to be effective in improving symptoms of pseudofolliculitis barbae [4].
Radiofrequency
-
Radiofrequency devices do not specifically target melanin.
-
They, however, have been studied in conjunction with IPL and diode lasers to increase effectiveness, particularly with difficult to treat fine or fair hairs [17, 18].
-
One study found that the addition of aminolevulinic acid to radiofrequency/IPL hair removal increased efficacy in removal of white terminal hairs [19].
Indications
-
Aesthetic removal/reduction of unsightly or unwanted hair.
-
Medical conditions where excessive hair growth may be characteristic, or conditions where hair removal may improve course of disease.Footnote 1 These include:
-
Idiopathic hirsutism: male-pattern, androgen-dependent hair growth in women not secondary to any identifiable factor.
-
Local acquired hypertrichosisFootnote 2.
-
Pseudofolliculitis barbae.
-
-
Laser hair removal has been shown to be most safe and effective in patients with fair skin and dark, course hair due to the ability for laser wavelengths to more selectively target melanin in the hair follicle.
-
With proper wavelength, fluence, spot size and pulse duration selection, patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV or greater may be treated with variable success.
Contraindications
-
Unable to tolerate other forms of light therapy, such as:
-
Patients with seizure disorders triggered by light
-
Patients with lupus erythematosus
-
Patients who have received or are currently receiving gold therapy
-
Patients with a light sensitivity disorder
-
Patients taking medication that increases sensitivity to light
-
-
Active local infections.
-
Pregnant (effects on fetus are unknown).
-
Patients with tattoos in the area to be treated should be advised that changes in tattoo color might occur.
-
History of depilation within 2 weeks prior to treatment. Removal of the hair follicle prior to laser therapy may decrease effectiveness.
Procedural Technique/Considerations
Pre-op Care
-
A full medical history should be obtained prior to the first laser hair removal session. This should include:
-
Current medications
-
History of recent sun exposure
-
Endocrine status
-
History of light insensitivity
-
Scarring tendencies
-
Recent hair removal methods that may have been performed as well as any side effects that may have been experienced with them
-
-
Conditions and medications that may cause hirsutism or hypertrichosis can be found in Tables 10.1 and 10.2.
-
Patient expectations should be discussed prior to treatment.
-
Laser hair removal has only been shown to result in the permanent reduction of hair quantity, not in permanent total hair loss (no matter how many sessions are performed).
-
While total hair loss may be seen for some weeks to months, hair re-growth is expected.
-
Hair loss may not occur immediately after treatment. It may take up to 2 weeks for affected hair to fall out.
-
Fair or velus hair that grows from treated areas may darken over time.
-
-
Patients should be counseled to avoid plucking or electrolysis 4 weeks prior to treatment.
-
Sun exposure to treated areas should be none to minimal beginning 6 weeks before the procedure to 6 weeks after the procedure, especially if at risk for hyperpigmentation.
-
If there is a history of herpes simplex virus (HSV) outbreaks in the area to be treated, antiviral prophylaxis can be given for 1 week, started 2–3 days prior to laser treatment.
-
A test spot may be performed in an area that is discrete, yet similar in skin color, sun exposure and hair density to the treated area.
-
Each setting should be tested with four, 10 % overlapping spots.
-
It may take 1–2 days to demonstrate side effects.
-
Erythema and perifollicular edema are expected (Fig. 10.1).
-
Intolerable pain, erythema and edema that last for longer than a few hours, blistering or crusting are all indications that fluence should be decreased.
-
Technical Considerations
-
Protective eyewear must always be used.
-
Consult laser manual for specific fluences, spot sizes and pulse durations as these differ between laser systems. Many programs have pre-set parameters based on skin phenotype.
-
Larger spot sizes may be more effective for hair removal at identical fluences [24].
-
Hair in the treated area should be shaved or trimmed to avoid thermal damage from heat diffusion.
-
A mild cooling spray or dynamic cooling device can be used to improve patient safety and comfort.
-
Topical anesthetics may be used for patient comfort.
Post-op Care
-
Wound care and/or dressings are typically not necessary following treatment.
-
Arrange open lines of communication should any adverse events occur.
-
Multiple laser treatments may be necessary to yield effective clinical results [25].
Complications
The reported incidence of complications following laser for hair removal is low, however side effects are more common in patients with Fitzpatrick skin types IV–VI due to competition with epidermal melanin.
-
Expected side effects:
-
Pain (mild to moderate)
-
Erythema
-
Perifollicular edema
-
Unwanted side effects:
-
Temporary dyspigmentation
-
Blistering
-
Crusting
-
Infection
-
Scarring
-
Hypertrichosis
-
Prevention and Management of Complications
-
Topical anesthetics may be used. If pain is intolerable, however, strength may be too high.
-
The risk of blistering and crusting, and thereafter infection and scarring are more common when treating patients with darker pigmentation or patients who have had recent sun exposure to the treated area [26]. Careful selection of wavelength, fluence and pulse duration can help minimize the risk of these effects [27]. Test spots may also help identify settings.
-
The etiology of paradoxical hypertrichosis is unknown, yet it is thought to be related to sub-therapeutic dosing [28]. It is more common in Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV, particularly patients of Mediterranean or Pacific Asian descent, as well as patients with hirsutism [6, 7].
-
Patients should be reassured regarding expected side effects of erythema and perifollicular edema.
-
Physicians should always make themselves available to address any and all questions and concerns patients may have.
Conclusion
-
Lasers and IPL are an effective means of reducing hair growth.
-
Laser hair removal does not result in the total, permanent loss of hair.
-
Treatment typically requires several sessions to maintain hair loss.
-
Home-based systems are not as effective as professional systems.
-
Future studies are needed to optimize laser hair removal of white, blonde, and red hairs.
-
A highly effective and safe hair removal system for patients with deeply pigmented skin is still currently not available.
Notes
- 1.
When evaluating for idiopathic hirsutism, it is important to rule out conditions in which increased hair growth may be a harbinger for more serious underlying conditions. These may include polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), congenital andrenal hyperplasia (CAH), or malignancies (Table 10.1).
- 2.
Generalized secondary hypertrichosis, typically drug-induced, may resolve with removal of the inciting agent (Table 10.2).
References
Town G, Ash C, Dierickx C, Fritz K, Bjerring P, Haedersdal M. Guidelines on the safety of light-based home-use hair removal devices from the European Society for Laser Dermatology. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26:799–811.
Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Science. 1983;220:524–7.
Ito S, Fujita K. Microanalysis of eumelanin and pheomelanin in hair and melanomas by chemical degradation and liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem. 1985;144:527–36.
Rogers CJ, Glaser DA. Treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae using the Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with topical carbon suspension. Dermatol Surg. 2000;26:737–42.
Radmanesh M. Paradoxical hypertrichosis and terminal hair change after intense pulsed light hair removal therapy. J Dermatolog Treat. 2009;20:52–4.
Alajlan A, Shapiro J, Rivers JK, MacDonald N, Wiggin J, Lui H. Paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser epilation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005;53:85–8.
Moreno-Arias G, Castelo-Branco C, Ferrando J. Paradoxical effect after IPL photoepilation. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:1013–6; discussion 6.
Kontoes P, Vlachos S, Konstantinos M, Anastasia L, Myrto S. Hair induction after laser-assisted hair removal and its treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:64–7.
Campos VB, Dierickx CC, Farinelli WA, Lin TY, Manuskiatti W, Anderson RR. Ruby laser hair removal: evaluation of long-term efficacy and side effects. Lasers Surg Med. 2000;26:177–85.
Shirkavand A, Ataie-Fashtami L, Sarkar S, et al. Thermal damage patterns of diode hair-removal lasers according to various skin types and hair densities and colors: a simulation study. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012;30:374–80.
Tanzi EL, Alster TS. Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser-assisted hair removal in all skin types. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:13–7.
Bouzari N, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y. Laser hair removal: comparison of long-pulsed Nd:YAG, long-pulsed alexandrite, and long-pulsed diode lasers. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:498–502.
Babilas P, Schreml S, Szeimies RM, Landthaler M. Intense pulsed light (IPL): a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42:93–104.
Nanni CA, Alster TS. Laser-assisted hair removal: side effects of Q-switched Nd:YAG, long-pulsed ruby, and alexandrite lasers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:165–71.
Bakus AD, Garden JM, Yaghmai D, Massa MC. Long-term fine caliber hair removal with an electro-optic Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42:706–11.
Rogers CJ, Glaser DA, Siegfried EC, Walsh PM. Hair removal using topical suspension-assisted Q-switched Nd:YAG and long-pulsed alexandrite lasers: a comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25:844–4; discussion 848–50.
Sadick NS, Shaoul J. Hair removal using a combination of conducted radiofrequency and optical energies – an 18-month follow-up. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6:21–6.
Sadick NS, Laughlin SA. Effective epilation of white and blond hair using combined radiofrequency and optical energy. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2004;6:27–31.
Goldberg DJ, Marmur ES, Hussain M. Treatment of terminal and vellus non-pigmented hairs with an optical/bipolar radiofrequency energy source-with and without pre-treatment using topical aminolevulinic acid. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2005;7:25–8.
Bode D, Seehusen DA, Baird D. Hirsutism in women. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85:373–80.
Castelo-Soccio LA. Hair manifestations of systemic disease. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2012;42:198–203.
Wendelin DS, Pope DN, Mallory SB. Hypertrichosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48:161–79; quiz 80–1.
Tosi A, Misciali C, Piraccini BM, Peluso AM, Bardazzi F. Drug-induced hair loss and hair growth. Incidence, management and avoidance. Drug Saf. 1994;10:310–7.
Nouri K, Chen H, Saghari S, Ricotti Jr CA. Comparing 18- versus 12-mm spot size in hair removal using a gentlease 755-nm alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:494–7.
Bouzari N, Nouri K, Tabatabai H, Abbasi Z, Firooz A, Dowlati Y. The role of number of treatments in laser-assisted hair removal using a 755-nm alexandrite laser. J Drugs Dermatol. 2005;4:573–8.
Lanigan SW. Incidence of side effects after laser hair removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:882–6.
Wanner M. Laser hair removal. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18:209–16.
Bouzari N, Firooz AR. Lasers may induce terminal hair growth. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32:460.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ledon, J.A., Savas, J.A., Franca, K., Nouri, K. (2014). Laser Hair Removal. In: Nouri, K. (eds) Handbook of Lasers in Dermatology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5322-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-5322-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-5321-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-5322-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)