Skip to main content

Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil

  • Chapter
Foreign Policy Responses to the Rise of Brazil

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

  • 278 Accesses

Abstract

In the last two decades, Brazil has emerged as a global actor. Its rise is embodied in such acronyms as BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), IBSA (India, Brazil, South Africa), and BASIC (Brazil, South Africa, India, China), which include emerging states from several world regions. Brazil’s emergence has been an unintended outcome of its foreign policy, not because the government did not seek international recognition but because it planned to reach it through regional blocs rather than transregional alliances. There are two reasons for this unpre-dicted result: first, Brazil has been widening the gap with its neighbours; second, the organizations it has created as regional means to global ends have not delivered as expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burges, Sean W. (2005) ‘Bounded by the Reality of Trade: Practical Limits to a South American Region’, Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18(3), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Jorge (ed.) (1999) Mercosur. Entre la realidad y la utopía, Buenos Aires: Editorial Nuevohacer/CEI.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEBRI-CINDES — Centro Brasileiro de Relações Internacionais — Centro de Estudos de Integração e Desenvolvimento (2007) Força-Tarefa ‘O Brasil na América do Sul’, Relatório Final, Rio de Janeiro, June, http://www.cebri.org/midia/documentos/377_PDF.pdf, date accessed 7 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnton, Christopher (2015) ‘The Rise of Brazil: Concepts and Comparisons’, in David R. Mares and Arie M. Kacowicz (eds), Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security Studies, London and New York: Routledge, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, Louise and Andrew Hurrell (1995) Regionalism in World Politics. Regional Organization and International Order, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardini, Gian Luca (2010) ‘Proyectos de integración regional sudamericana: hacia una teoría de convergencia regional’, Relaciones Internacionales 15, 11–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garzón, Jorge (2015) ‘Multipolarity and the Future of Regionalism: Latin America and Beyond’, GIGA Working Paper, No. 264, Hamburg: GIGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Marc and Philip Robbins, eds (2014) The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, Abingdon and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, Kathryn (2014) ‘The Brazilian National Development Bank Goes International: Innovations and Limitations of BNDES’ Internationalization’, Global Policy 5(3), 360–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, Kathryn and Alfred P. Montero (2013) ‘The Renewed Developmentalist State: The National Development Bank and the Brazil Model’, Journal of Development Studies 49(11), 1484–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IADB (2008) Evaluation of IDB Action in the Initiative for Integration of Regional Infrastructure in South America (IIRSA), Washington, DC: IADB.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Nación (2007) ‘No sera fácil el gasoducto de Venezuela’, 22 May, http://www.lanacion.com.ar/910671-no-sera-facil-el-gasoducto-de-venezuela, date accessed 4 August 2015.

  • Lima, Maria Regina Soares and Monica Hirst (2006) ‘Brazil as an Intermediate State and Regional Power: Action, Choice and Responsibilities’, International Affairs 82(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés (2011) ‘A Leader without Followers? The Growing Divergence between the Regional and Global Performance of Brazilian Foreign Policy’, Latin American Politics and Society 53(3), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés (2013) ‘Overlapping Regionalism, No Integration: The Latin American Experiences’, EUI Working Paper RSCAS [Florence] 2013/20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés (2015) ‘Interdependence, Leadership and Institutionalization: The Triple Deficit and Fading Prospects of Mercosur’, in Søren Dosenrode (ed.), Limits to Regional Integration, Farnham: Ashgate, 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés and Eduardo Viola (2015) Multipolarity, Minilateralism and the Downgrading of Regionalism, manuscript under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés and Gian Luca Gardini (2012) ‘Has Regionalism Peaked? The Latin American Quagmire and its Lessons’, The International Spectator 47(1), 116–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés and Isabella Alcañiz (2014) ‘Managing Security in a Zone of Peace: Brazil’s Soft Approach to Regional Governance’, EUI Working Paper RSCAS [Florence] 2014/50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés and Julio C. Rodriguez (2014) ‘Straddling a Region and the World: Brazil’s Dual Foreign Policy Comes of Age’, in Marc Herzog and Philip Robbins (eds), The Role, Position and Agency of Cusp States in International Relations, London and New York: Routledge, 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malamud, Andrés and Philippe C. Schmitter (2011) ‘The Experience of European Integration and the Potential for Integration in South America’, in Alex Warleigh-Lack, Nick Robinson, and Ben Rosamond (eds), New Regionalism and the European Union. Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions, London and New York: Routledge, 135–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merke, Federico (2013) ‘Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil’s Rising Power’, prepared for the Conference ‘Rising Powers and Contested Orders in the Multipolar System’, September 19–20, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Nicola and Germán C. Prieto (2011) ‘The Demise of New Regionalism. Reframing the Study of Contemporary Regional Integration in Latin America’, in Alex Warleigh-Lack, Nick Robinson, and Ben Rosamond (eds), New Regionalism and the European Union. Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions, London and New York: Routledge, 116–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prys, Miriam (2010) ‘Hegemony, Domination, Detachment: Differences in Regional Powerhood’, International Studies Review 12(4), 479–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resende-Santos, João (2002) ‘The Origins of Security Cooperation in the Southern Cone’, Latin American Politics and Society 44(4), 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, Pía (2014) ‘Regionalism through Social Policy: Collective Action and Health Diplomacy in South America’, Economy and Society 43(3), 432–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, Pía and Diana Tussie (2012) The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in Latin America, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, Júlio César Cossio (2012) ‘Chacal ou Cordeiro? O Brasil frente aos desafios e oportunidades do Sistema Internacional’, Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 55(2), 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, José Antonio (2009) ‘Del ‘regionalismo abierto’ al ‘regionalismo post-liberal’. Crisis y cambio en la integración regional en América Latina’, in Anuario de la Integración Regional de América Latina y el Gran Caribe, vol. 7, Buenos Aires: Coordinadora Regional de Investigaciones Económicas y Sociales, 12–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schenoni, Luis L. (2014) ‘Brasil en América del Sur: la lógica de la unipolaridad regional’, Nueva Sociedad 250, 138–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholvin, Sören and Andrés Malamud (2014) ‘Is There a Geoeconomic Node in South America? Geography, Politics and Brazil’s Role in Regional Economic Integration’, ICS Working Paper [Lisbon] 2/2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza, Amaury (2009) A agenda internacional do Brasil: A política externa brasileira de FHC a Lula, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, CEBRI and Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spektor, Matias (2010) ‘Brazil: The Underlying Ideas of Regional Policies’, in Daniel Flemes (ed.), Regional Leadership in the Global System: Ideas, Interests and Strategies of Regional Powers, Aldershot: Ashgate, 191–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuenkel, Oliver (2013) ‘Is Brazil the New Regional Champion of Democracy?’ Americas Quarterly, http://www.americasquarterly.org/content/brazil-new-regional-champion-democracy, date accessed 6 January 2014.

  • Tussie, Diana (2009) ‘Latin America: Contrasting Motivations for Regional Projects’, Review of International Studies 35(s1), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiffen, Britta, Leslie Wehner, and Detlef Nolte (2013) ‘Overlapping Regional Security Institutions in South America: The Case of OAS and UNASUR’, International Area Studies Review 16(4), 370–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 Andrés Malamud

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Malamud, A. (2016). Latin American Regionalism Faces the Rise of Brazil. In: Gardini, G.L., de Almeida, M.H.T. (eds) Foreign Policy Responses to the Rise of Brazil. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-51669-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics