Abstract
Detecting and discriminating touches on your fingertip and other highly sensitive body parts has been a paradigm in somatosensory science since the birth of psychophysics in the nineteenth century. By isolating a body part and applying discrete stimuli over many repetitions, the limits of somatosensation and bodily perception can be discovered. This chapter will focus on two methods of studying discriminative touch in the temporal and spatial domains: vibrotactile perception and spatial acuity. Different psychophysical approaches and experimental designs will be described and evaluated in terms of their validity, efficiency, and reliability. Practical and participant-specific difficulties will be noted. Vibrotactile and spatial acuity methods offer relatively cheap and reliable measures of somatosensation, often suitable for undergraduate student projects. Yet care and experimentation is required to ensure that the experimental design is adequate, and the data collection is sufficient to answer your theoretical question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weber EH (1978) E.H. Weber on the tactile senses. Academic Press
Fechner GT (1860) Elemente der psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. Breitkopf und Härtel, Leipzig
Bradman MJG, Ferrini F, Salio C, Merighi A (2015) Practical mechanical threshold estimation in rodents using von frey hairs/semmes-weinstein monofilaments: towards a rational method. J Neurosci Methods 255:92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.08.010
von Békésy G (1967) Sensory inhibition. PhD thesis, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ
Sadibolova R, Tamè L, Walsh E, Longo MR (2018) Mind the gap: the effects of temporal and spatial separation in localization of dual touches on the hand. Front Hum Neurosci 12:55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00055
Hidaka S, Tamè L, Longo MR (2021) Tactile interactions in the path of tactile apparent motion. Cognition 209:104569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104569
Hayward V (2008) A brief taxonomy of tactile illusions and demonstrations that can be done in a hardware store. Brain Res Bull 75(6):742–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.01.008
Lederman SJ, Jones LA (2011) Tactile and haptic illusions. IEEE Trans Haptics 4(4):273–294. https://doi.org/10.1109/ToH.2011.2
Geldard FA (1953) The human senses. Wiley, New York, pp 11–584
Bolanowski SJJ, Gescheider GA, Verrillo RT, Checkosky CM (1988) Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. J Acoust Soc Am 84(5):1680–1694. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.397184
Craig JC (1985a) Tactile pattern perception and its perturbations. J Acoust Soc Am 77(1):238–246. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392265
Verrillo RT (1985) Psychophysics of vibrotactile stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 77(1):225–232
Saal HP, Bensmaia SJ (2014) Touch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility. Trends Cogn Sci 37(12):689–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.012
Boring EG (1942) Sensation and perception in the history of experimental psychology. Appleton-Century, New York, pp 15–644
Craig JC, Johnson KO (2000) The two-point threshold: not a measure of tactile spatial resolution. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9(1):29–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00054
Johnson KO, Phillips JR (1981) Tactile spatial resolution. I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating recognition, and letter recognition. J Neurophysiol 46(6):1177–1191. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1177
Phillips JR, Johnson KO (1981b) Tactile spatial resolution. II. Neural representation of bars, edges, and gratings in monkey primary afferents. J Neurophysiol 46(6):1192–1203. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1981.46.6.1192
Onishi H, Nagasaka K, Yokota H, Kojima S, Ohno K, Sakurai N, Kodama N, Sato D, Otsuru N (2022) Association between somatosensory sensitivity and regional gray matter volume in healthy young volunteers: a voxel-based morphometry study. Cereb Cortex:bhac188. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhac188
Tong J, Mao O, Goldreich D (2013) Two-point orientation discrimination versus the traditional two-point test for tactile spatial acuity assessment. Front Hum Neurosci 7:579. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00579
Tremblay F, Backman A, Cuenco A, Vant K, Wassef AM (2000) Assessment of spatial acuity at the fingertip with grating (JVP) domes: validity for use in an elderly population. Somatosens Mot Res 17(1):61–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/08990220070300
French B, Di Chiaro NV, Holmes NP (2022) Hand posture, but not vision of the hand, affects tactile spatial resolution in the grating orientation discrimination task. Exp Brain Res 240:2715–2723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-022-06450-3
Tamè L, Braun C, Lingnau A, Schwarzbach JV, Demarchi G, Hegner YL, Farnè A, Pavani F (2012) The contribution of primary and secondary somatosensory cortices to the representation of body parts and body sides: an fMRI adaptation study. J Cogn Neurosci 24(12):2306–2320. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00272
Tamè L, Pavani F, Papadelis C, Farnè A, Braun C (2015) Early integration of bilateral touch in the primary somatosensory cortex. Hum Brain Mapp 36(4):1506–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22719
Brönnimann B, Meier ML, Hou M, Parkinson C, Ettlin DA (2016) Novel air stimulation MR-device for intraoral quantitative sensory cold testing. Front Hum Neurosci 10:335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00335
Servos P, Zacks J, Rumelhart DE, Glover GH (1998) Somatotopy of the human arm using fMRI. Neuroreport 9(4):605–609. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199803090-00008
Huang R, Chen C, Tran AT (2012) Mapping multisensory parietal face and body areas in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(44):18114–18119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207946109
Chen C, Kreutz-Delgado K, Sereno MI, Huang R (2017) Validation of periodic fMRI signals in response to wearable tactile stimulation. NeuroImage 150:99–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.024
Huang R, Sereno MI (2007) Dodecapus: an MR-compatible system for somatosensory stimulation. NeuroImage 34(3):1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.024
Tamè L, Tucciarelli R, Sadibolova R, Sereno MI, Longo MR (2021) Reconstructing neural representations of tactile space. NeuroImage 229:117730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117730
Broser PJ, Braun C (2012) Hydraulic driven fast and precise nonmagnetic tactile stimulator for neurophysiological and MEG measurements. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 59(10):2852–2858. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2012.2212191
Valentini M, Kischka U, Halligan PW (2008) Residual haptic sensation following stroke using ipsilateral stimulation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79(3):266–270. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2007.120279
Gibson GO, Craig JC (2006) The effect of force and conformance on tactile intensive and spatial sensitivity. Exp Brain Res 170(2):172–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0200-1
Goldreich D, Wong M, Peters RM, Kanics IM (2009) A tactile automated passive-finger stimulator (TAPS). J Vis Exp 28:e1374. https://doi.org/10.3791/1374
Liao X, Li Y, Hu J, Ding X, Zhang X, Ying B, Takatera M, Sukigara S, Pan F, Sun Y, Wang Y, Feng W, Zhu C, Li Q, Wu X (2018) Effects of contact method and acclimation on temperature and humidity in touch perception. Can J 14:1605–1615. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517705628
Tamè L, Holmes NP (2016) Involvement of human primary somatosensory cortex in vibrotactile detection depends on task demand. NeuroImage 138:184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.056
Tamè L, Braun C, Holmes NP, Farnè A, Pavani F (2016) Bilateral representations of touch in the primary somatosensory cortex. Cogn Neuropsychol 33(1–2):48–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2016.1159547
Vardar Y, Güçlü B, Basdogan C (2018) Tactile masking by electrovibration. IEEE Trans Haptics 11(4):623–635. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2018.2855124
Tamè L, Moles AP, Holmes NP (2014) Within, but not between hands interactions in vibrotactile detection thresholds reflect somatosensory receptive field organization. Front Psychol 5:174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00174
Medina S, Tamè L, Longo MR (2018) Tactile localization biases are modulated by gaze direction. Exp Brain Res 236(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5105-2
Gescheider GA, Bolanowski SJJ, Hall KRL, Hoffmann KE, Verrillo RT (1994) The effects of aging on information-processing channels in the sense of touch: I. Absolute sensitivity. Somatosens Mot Res 11(4):345–357. https://doi.org/10.3109/08990229409028878
Harris JA, Thein T, Clifford CWG (2004) Dissociating detection from localization of tactile stimuli. J Neurosci 24(14):3683–3693. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0134-04.2004
Schmidt TT, Blankenburg F (2018) Brain regions that retain the spatial layout of tactile stimuli during working memory – a “tactospatial sketchpad”? NeuroImage 178:531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.076
Tamè L, Bumpus N, Linkenauger SA, Longo MR (2017) Distorted body representations are robust to differences in experimental instructions. Atten Percept Psychophys 79(4):1204–1216. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1301-1
Tamè L, Linkenauger SA, Longo MR (2018) Dissociation of feeling and belief in the rubber hand illusion. PLoS One 13(10):e206367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206367
Heed T, Azañón E (2014) Using time to investigate space: a review of tactile temporal order judgments as a window onto spatial processing in touch. Front Psychol 5:76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00076
Constable MD, Welsh TN, Huffman G, Pratt J (2019) I before U: temporal order judgements reveal bias for self-owned objects. Q J Exp Psychol 72(3):589–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818762010
Baumgarten TJ, Schnitzler A, Lange J (2016b) Prestimulus alpha power influences tactile temporal perceptual discrimination and confidence in decisions. Cereb Cortex 26(3):891–903. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu247
Grund M, Forschack N, Nierhaus T, Villringer A (2021) Neural correlates of conscious tactile perception: an analysis of bold activation patterns and graph metrics. NeuroImage 224:117384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117384
Hurme M, Railo H (2022) Promise and challenges for discovering transcranial magnetic stimulation induced “numbsense”—commentary on Ro & Koenig (2021). Conscious Cogn 98:103265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103265
Bruyer R, Brysbaert M (2011) Combining speed and accuracy in cognitive psychology: is the inverse efficiency score (IES) a better dependent variable than the mean reaction time (RT) and the percentage of errors (PE)? Psychol Belg 51(1):5–13
Orne MT (1962) On the social psychology of the psychological experiment, with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. Am Psychol 17(11):776–783. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043424
Croy I, Bierling A, Sailer U, Ackerley R (2021) Individual variability of pleasantness ratings to stroking touch over different velocities. Neuroscience 464:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.03.030
Watson AB, Pelli DG (1983) QUEST: a Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Percept Psychophys 33(2):113–120. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03202828
Brainard DH (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10(4):433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00357
D’Amour SAO, Harris LR (2014) Contralateral tactile masking between forearms. Exp Brain Res 232(3):821–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3791-y
Rusconi E, Tamè L, Furlan M, Haggard P, Demarchi G, Adriani M, Ferrari P, Braun C, Schwarzbach JV (2014) Neural correlates of finger gnosis. J Neurosci 34(27):9012–9023. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3119-13.2014
LaMotte RH, Mountcastle VB (1975) Capacities of humans and monkeys to discriminate between vibratory stimuli of different frequency and amplitude: a correlation between neural events and psychophysical measurements. J Neurophysiol 38:539–559
Whang KC, Burton H, Shulman GL (1991) Selective attention in vibrotactile tasks: detecting the presence and absence of amplitude change. Percept Psychophys 50(2):157–165. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03212216
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Holmes, N.P., Tamè, L. (2023). Detection, Discrimination & Localization: The Psychophysics of Touch. In: Holmes, N.P. (eds) Somatosensory Research Methods. Neuromethods, vol 196. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3068-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-3067-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-3068-6
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols