Skip to main content

A Multiplex PCR Approach to Determine Vegetative Incompatibility Genotypes and Mating Type in Cryphonectria parasitica

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Plant Pathology

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 2536))

  • 1175 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter presents a genotyping assay that uses DNA isolated from axenic cultures of Cryphonectria parasitica, which discriminates the six known diallelic vic loci and the two mating idiomorphs (MAT gene) based on (i) modified primer, labeled with a fluorescent dye, (ii) multiplex polymerase chain reaction (multiplex-PCR), and (iii) capillary electrophoresis system. Alternatively, we show that the same primer set is suitable for conventional PCR of each vic locus and MAT gene using nonmodified primer and agarose gel electrophoresis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Peever TL, Liu Y-C, Cortesi P et al (2000) Variation in tolerance and virulence in the chestnut blight fungus-hypovirus interaction. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4863–4869

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bryner S, Rigling D (2012) Hypovirus virulence and vegetative incompatibility in populations of the chestnut blight fungus. Phytopathology 102:1161–1167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortesi P, McCulloch CE, Song H et al (2001) Genetic control of horizontal virus transmission in the chestnut blight fungus, Cryphonectria parasitica. Genetics 159:107–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cortesi P, Milgroom MG (1998) Genetics of vegetative incompatibility in Cryphonectria parasitica. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:2988–2994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Blacket MJ, Robin C, Good RT et al (2012) Universal primers for fluorescent labelling of PCR fragments—an efficient and cost-effective approach to genotyping by fluorescence. Mol Ecol Resour 12:456–463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi GH, Dawe AL, Churbanov A et al (2012) Molecular characterization of vegetative incompatibility genes that restrict hypovirus transmission in the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Genetics 190:113–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang D-X, Spiering MJ, Dawe AL et al (2014) Vegetative incompatibility loci with dedicated roles in allorecognition restrict mycovirus transmission in chestnut blight fungus. Genetics 197:701–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marra RE, Milgroom MG (2001) The mating system of the fungus Cryphonectria parasitica: selfing and self-incompatibility. Heredity 86:134–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Short DP, Double M, Nuss DL et al (2015) Multilocus PCR assays elucidate vegetative incompatibility gene profiles of Cryphonectria parasitica in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5736–5742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cornejo C, Šever B, Kupper Q et al (2019) A multiplexed genotyping assay to determine vegetative incompatibility and mating type in Cryphonectria parasitica. Eur J Plant Pathol 155:81–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blais J, Lavoie SB, Giroux S et al (2015) Risk of misdiagnosis due to allele dropout and false-positive PCR artifacts in molecular diagnostics: analysis of 30,769 genotypes. J Mol Diagn 17:505–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Miller CR, Joyce P, Waits LP (2002) Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using Maximum Likelihood. Genetics 160:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the thoughtful comments of Daniel Rigling on an early version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Swiss Federal Office for the Environment FOEN.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carolina Cornejo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this protocol

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this protocol

Kupper, Q., Cornejo, C. (2022). A Multiplex PCR Approach to Determine Vegetative Incompatibility Genotypes and Mating Type in Cryphonectria parasitica. In: Luchi, N. (eds) Plant Pathology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2536. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2517-0_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2517-0_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2516-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2517-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics