Abstract
Ascidians are sessile tunicates, that is, marine animals belonging to the phylum Chordata and considered the sister group of vertebrates. They are widespread in all the seas, constituting abundant communities in various ecosystems. Among chordates, only tunicates are able to reproduce asexually, forming colonies. The high regenerative potentialities enabling tunicates to regenerate damaged body parts, or the whole body, represent a peculiarity of this taxon. Here we review the methodological approaches used in more than a century of biological studies to induce regeneration in both solitary and colonial species. For solitary species, we refer to the regeneration of single organs or body parts (e.g., siphon, brain, gonad, tunic, viscera). For colonial species, we review a plethora of experiments regarding the surgical manipulation of colonies, the regeneration of isolated colonial entities, such as single buds in the tunic, or part of tunic and its circulatory system.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download protocol PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Key words
- Colonial circulatory system
- Evisceration
- Gonad
- Neural complex
- Partial regeneration
- Siphon
- Thorax
- Tunic
- Whole body regeneration
1 Introduction
Within the phylum Chordata , which includes the three subphyla Vertebrata, Cephalochordata, and Tunicata (Fig. 1), the latter exhibits the more striking regenerative abilities. This feature, widely recognized by the scientific community since the end of the nineteenth century, raised renewed interests in the last 15 years, thanks to the availability of new methodological tools enabling the dissection of its molecular and cellular bases [1, 2]. In tunicates, the regenerative ability shows remarkable differences in various clades, even in different tissues and organs of the same organism [3]. Nonetheless, in some species, it can extend to extremes of complete individuals formed, from a small group of stem cells in the case of whole-body regeneration (WBR) [4, 5].
Tunicates are filter feeding, marine organisms, widespread in all the seas, constituting abundant communities in various ecosystems. They are considered the sister group of vertebrates (Fig. 1) [6, 7], therefore representing, from an evolutionary point of view, an intriguing taxon for comparative studies on regeneration, a limited process in vertebrates [8, 9]. Tunicates include both solitary and colonial species, the latter representing the only chordates capable of asexual reproduction (also called budding) [10].
Ascidians represent the main tunicate group, now considered paraphyletic by several authors. Their life cycle includes a swimming larva, which exhibits the typical chordate body plan and is the dispersal phase of the species. The larva is lecithotrophic and swims for a few hours to select an appropriate substrate on which to adhere. Then, it undergoes a deep metamorphosis becoming a sessile individual, the juvenile, which possesses the capacity to regenerate.
Ascidian adult body is cylindrical, with an anterior inhalant (oral) siphon and a dorsal exhalant (atrial) siphon (Figs. 2 and 3). The brain (called cerebral ganglion) is located between the two siphons. The brain, together with the associated neural gland, forms the neural complex. The majority of the body is occupied by a large branchial chamber (pharynx) perforated by numerous ciliated stigmata [11]. The inhaled water enters the branchial chamber and, passing through the stigmata, is filtered by a mucous net produced by the endostyle. The latter is a glandular groove located in the ventral floor of the branchial chamber. The filtered seawater passes then to the atrial chamber and is expelled through the atrial siphon . Nutrients, entrapped in the mucous net, are agglutinated in a mucous cord that is conveyed to the U-shaped gut, located posteriorly, below the branchial chamber. The anus opens into the atrial chamber, so that the fecal pellets are removed by the exhalant water flow. Ascidians are hermaphrodites; gonads can be located in the posterior body, close to the gut, or in the lateral body wall.
In solitary ascidians, the cylindrical, tube-like body shape suggested a wide range of regeneration experiments involving mainly distal body parts, such as the siphons and the neural complex (Table 1) (Fig. 3b–f). In the solitary species of the genus Ciona, C. intestinalis and C. robusta, for which very advanced methodological tools are available, regeneration has been comprehensively explored in terms of both its morphological and cellular/molecular aspects (Table 2) [1]. Among other emerging model species, Polyandrocarpa mytiligera is a solitary ascidian of the Red Sea that, for example, can regenerate the whole gut after its evisceration [12,13,14].
In colonial ascidians, several individuals (zooids) are organized in large colonies exhibiting astonishing morphologies and colors (Fig. 3g) [10]. Usually, regeneration is seen as the ability of an organism to regrow or repair its cells, tissues and organs after their loss or severe injury . However, to some extent, asexual reproduction in colonial ascidians is considered an expansion of regeneration, as a nonembryonic development of new individuals. Indeed, the ability of colonial ascidians to activate unusual developmental pathways in both natural and/or induced conditions makes the border between asexual reproduction and a true, injury-induced, regeneration quite faint [2, 11].
In colonial ascidians, a plethora of regeneration experiments has been performed regarding, in general, the removal of single individuals from colonies (single buds, adult individuals, both buds and adult zooids) (Table 3; Fig. 3g–j) [2]. However, the regeneration of isolated colonial entities (e.g., isolated buds in the tunic, the whole tunic with its circulatory system without any zooid) and the regeneration of part of the tunic and its circulatory system have also been studied (Fig. 3k–l). The latter is a network of hemolymphatic vessels (Fig. 3g) connected to a marginal vessel that extends along the periphery of the colony. Several radial vessels emerge from each zooid and connect them to the marginal vessel. Blind, sausage-like ampullae elongate toward the tunic periphery. Among colonial ascidians, Botryllus schlosseri is one of the most studied species. However, several ascidians species can be maintained in laboratory culture throughout their life cycle and used for regeneration experiments (Table 3). Thanks to their recurrent budding, the ability to survive in aquaria also beyond their natural lifespan (useful to study ageing), the possibility to be split in fragments to analyze different conditions in the same genetic environment, their sequenced genome, and the availability of some molecular tools for unbiased results (Table 4), colonial ascidians provide valuable models for an integrated approach to regeneration.
On the whole, studies on both solitary and colonial species are shedding light in outstanding challenging topics of contemporary biological science, such as the connections between animal regeneration and regenerative medicine, stem cells biology, aging, and tissue homeostasis [1, 15].
Here, we briefly review the different types of regeneration experiments performed in ascidians in more than a century. Moreover, we present, in an historical perspective, the methodological approaches used to induce regeneration in both solitary and colonial ascidians.
2 Regeneration in Solitary Ascidians
The study of regeneration in solitary ascidians has a long story as it began at the end of the nineteenth and the early beginning of the twentieth century, with the experiments carried out by a series of German scientists working at the Stazione Zoologica, in Naples (Italy), newly founded by Anthon Dohrn [16,17,18]. With the establishment of a series of new French marine stations at the beginning of the last century, the contributions of the Belgian-French scientists appeared and, rapidly, acquired a predominance that was maintained throughout the first half of the century [19,20,21,22,23,24]. Then, the American school arose and, quickly, reached the visibility that it still has [25,26,27].
Solitary ascidians are capable of partial body regeneration (Table 1). In all the studied species, the epidermis can easily regenerate the tunic once the latter is removed [19, 20, 23]. When part of the body is removed, in most cases it can be reformed quite rapidly. C. intestinalis has been the reference model for the study of solitary ascidian regeneration for more than a century. In this species, when an animal is bisected, only the basal part can regenerate the missing one, provided that part of the pharyngeal basket is conserved; conversely, the distal part is unable to regenerate any basal structure. The regeneration includes organs such as the siphons, the neural complex, the gonads and the missing part of the digestive system.
The regeneration of the Ciona siphons attracted the attention of many researchers for the simplicity of the technique required: a scalpel and some anesthetic [28,29,30]. A full regeneration of the siphons has also been described in P. mytiligera, Styela plicata and Herdmania momus, whereas, Microcosmus exasperatus show a scrubby siphon reconstitution, suggesting an unequal distribution of the regenerative abilities among solitary species [31].
Jeffery and collaborators [32, 33] reinvestigated in detail the regeneration of the oral siphon in C. intestinalis (formerly called Ciona intestinalis type B) [34]. They demonstrated that both short-distance and long-distance processes are involved in oral siphon regeneration, the former based on the presence, in the remaining siphon stump, of a local pool of progenitor cells, the latter relying on the migration of progenitor cells from niches in the pharynx. Short-distance recruitment of progenitor cells is mainly involved in the formation of the orange-pigmented sensory organs (Fig. 3b, f) and is much more influenced by the depletion of the progenitor cell reservoir through repeated ablations [32]. When the siphon is amputated at its base, only long-distance recruitment of progenitor cells occurs [32].
A spectacular example of regeneration regards the two congeneric species P. mytiligera and P. tenera that can eject their viscera when subjected to stress conditions and rebuild them in less than 3 weeks [13]. Moreover, individuals of P. mytiligera can be separated in fragments by cutting along the longitudinal or transverse body axes. Each fragment then is able to regenerate completely the missing organs forming independent functional individuals [14].
As stated above, the methods used for studying regeneration in solitary ascidians were, in the past, quite simple: a scalpel or a razor blade to cut the animals or ablate the siphon (s), a dissection microscope to observe the anesthetized animals after the operation, eventually equipped with a camera lucida apparatus to record the regenerating steps in the recovering specimens (see the following “methodological approaches” section for a detailed historical overview on the methods used to induce regeneration). Today, the experimental procedure is not greatly different. The only relevant change is the introduction of in vivo imaging, which renders reporting much easier, and of electron microscopy analysis that allows detailed observations of the events at cellular levels. In addition, it must be stressed that, today, research on regeneration can exploit the abundance of biochemical and biomolecular toolkits offering the possibility to study in detail the events occurring during recovery. Table 2 reports the various approaches used for the study of regeneration and the attempt to elucidate the cells, genes, signaling pathways involved in the process.
3 Regeneration in Colonial Ascidians
The first studies on regeneration in colonial ascidians are those of Giard [35] in the second half of the nineteenth century, cited by [36]. Driesh [36], using Clavelina lepadiformis, observed that, dividing the animals in two, each fragment was able to regenerate the missing parts. C. lepadiformis was also used as a model organism for regeneration studies by Della Valle [37, 38]. In 1921, Huxley was one of the first authors to study regeneration in Perophora viridis, by recording the regenerative process after splitting the zooids in two [39]. The same author also investigated the regenerative capability of Aplidium pellucidum by isolating small colonial fragments. More detailed studies were carried out on the regeneration processes of P. viridis by Deviney, in 1934 [25], and by Goldin, in 1948 [40].
In the second half of the twentieth century, new model organisms, such as B. schlosseri and Botrylloides leachii , became the main protagonists of regeneration studies in colonial ascidians. Even today these two organisms are widely used for regeneration studies. Over the years, studies have focused on three aspects (Table 3):
-
1.
WBR
-
2.
Partial regeneration
-
3.
Circulatory system regeneration
3.1 WBR
WBR was studied in B. schlosseri, B. leachii , Botrylloides violaceus and Botrylloides diegensis following the surgical removal of all zooids and buds from a colony (Fig. 3g–j) or isolating small fragments of the colonial vasculature. This type of regeneration closely resembles vascular budding, a spontaneous formation of new buds from the vessels of the vascular system, first described in botryllid ascidians more than 200 years ago [41] and observed and described again by Giard [35], Bancroft [42], and Herdman [43]. This type of budding is constitutive in Botryllus primigenus [44], but it can also be induced through the isolation of small vascular fragments containing part of the colonial circulatory system [45,46,47]. In WBR , a bud, that eventually reconstitutes the whole colony, develops in the colonial vasculature from the aggregation of hemoblasts [5, 48,49,50,51,52]. Recently, Rosner and collaborators observed and studied an additional form of WBR in B. schlosseri, termed “budectomy induced WBR .” When, in a colony at takeover (the phase in which the adult zooids are being resorbed and replaced by their primary buds), all the buds are surgically removed leaving only old zooids undergoing resorption, new budlets can develop from the latter [53]. In this view, even the experiments performed on B. schlosseri colonies by Majone in 1977 can be considered as WBR [54]. In this case, new budlets develop from anterior bud fragments connected to the colonial vasculature. These new budlets eventually grow further to actively filter-feeding adults [54].
In species in which zooids are connected by stolons, such as Polyandrocarpa zorritensis, C. lepadiformis and P. viridis, WBR has been induced through the isolation of part of the stolon from the rest of the colony [21, 25, 37,38,39, 55, 56]. The success and timing of regeneration depend on the dimension of isolated stolon fragments [25, 38, 40]. Full recovery can require a period of time ranging from a few days, as in P. zorritensis [56], to several weeks, as in the case of small pieces of stolon of C. lepadiformis [37]. In A. pellucidum and P. viridis, Huxley [39] isolated small fragments of colonies or even of zooids, and observed what he called the “dedifferentiation” of the latter to undifferentiated structures from which new buds eventually developed [39]. These processes were further studied by Deviney in 1934 [25] and Goldin in 1948 [40].
In B. schlosseri, it is also possible to observe the regeneration of bud residuals. When, in a colony, a single adult individual is left and its primary and secondary buds are removed, bud residuals can reverse the degeneration process and start regeneration. This phenomenon, described for the first time by Sabbadin in 1956 [57, 58], probably occurs for the absence of competition among buds, allowing the residuals to rescue development . In this case, a constitutive degeneration of budlets is reversed in a regenerative process induced by the new colony condition. This is an example in which it is difficult to mark the border between asexual reproduction and typical regeneration, and it stresses the high homeostatic capacity of colonial organisms to survive adverse conditions.
3.2 Partial Body Regeneration
Partial body regeneration can also be observed in colonial species. In B. schlosseri [27], C. lepadiformis [21], Pycnoclavella neapolitana [59] and P. misakiensis [60, 61], the regeneration of the missing parts of amputated buds have been studied (Table 3). In these cases, no regression and development of new budlets are observed.
3.3 Tunic and Colonial Circulatory System Regeneration
Colonial ascidians have also been studied for the ability to regenerate their tunic and the colonial circulatory system. In B. schlosseri, the full regeneration of the tunic and circulatory system occur in few hours when the peripheral matrix (i.e., the tunic and the enclosed portion of vasculature) is removed [62, 63] or days, when also marginal and radial vessels are ablated from the colony (Fig. 1k, l) [64, 65].
As in solitary species, in more than a century of studies the surgical procedures employed to induce whole body or partial regeneration in colonial ascidians are roughly unchanged. However, the development of imaging and molecular tools allowed, in the last decades, the detailed study of the kinetics of regeneration, and the investigation of the molecular pathways involved in many aspects of WBR , as stem cells maintenance and differentiation (Table 4).
4 Methodological Approaches to Induce Regeneration: An Historical Overview
4.1 Solitary Ascidians
The first reports on induction of regeneration in solitary ascidians comes from Loeb (1892, cited in [36]), who observed siphon regeneration in Ciona, and Schultze [16], who documented siphon and brain regeneration and studied the process both in vivo and at the histological level. Almost 15 years later, Hirschler [18] cut individuals of Ciona transversely and obliquely through the thorax and utilized camera lucida drawings to record the regeneration process. Unfortunately, we do not have any information on the methodological approach used by these authors to induce regeneration. In 1930, Wermel published some methodological notes to study the regeneration of the oral siphon : he anesthetized animals of 4–7 cm in length (with MS222 or 10% chloral hydrate) and used fine dissection scissors to cut tissues [28].
Similar approaches for inducing regeneration were followed by later authors up to the more recently published reports, with some minor differences, such as the use of a scalpel to perform the ablations after the anesthetizing step [31].
Consecutive amputations of the oral siphon were used to study the recruitment of progenitor cells required for regeneration in Ciona [32].
In 1915, Sélys-Longchamps described the evisceration in individuals of Polycarpa tenera kept in aquaria [12], also induced in the congeneric species P. mytiligera by Shenkar and Gordon [13], whereas Bourchard-Mandrelle [66] observed gonad regeneration in Ciona after their removal through a small hole in the body wall.
In 1992, Bollner and collaborators [67] set up the methodological approach for inducing brain regeneration in Ciona, used also in subsequent works [68]: after anesthesia with MS222 (0.02%) they first cut the epidermis and the nerves anterior to the neural complex to expose the anterior neural gland (ciliated funnel), and then proceeded through the epidermis toward the posterior part of the neural complex that was finally separated from the pharyngeal basket and the posterior nerves.
Dahlberg et al. [69] obtained better results than traditional microdissection in the induction of brain regeneration in Ciona by anesthetizing animals in MS222 (0.4 g/L) or propylene phenoxetol (0.06%) in seawater for 15–30 min before ablation, dissection or live imaging. For the ablation, they used fine forceps and biopsy punch tools (2 and 3 mm diameter). Animals were placed in silicone-coated Petri dishes and the entire cerebral ganglion was removed (with the associated neural gland, its ciliated funnel and the dorsal tubercle), in a single action to minimize the trauma. A different method to produce a brain lesion and induce its regeneration in S. plicata was described in 2015 by Medina and collaborators [70]: it consisted on the systematic injection in the pharyngeal region of the neurotoxin 3-acetylpyridine (3-AP; 65 mg/kg body weight), diluted in sterilized artificial seawater. This compound is a niacinamide antagonist that inhibits ATP synthesis, resulting lethal to the high metabolic rate of neurons. At selected time points following injection, they anesthetized, killed, and dissected the animals to collect their brains, which were then processed for their analysis.
Some general methodological approaches to induce regeneration in solitary ascidian can be summarized as follow:
-
1.
Anesthetization of specimens, leave the animals in:
-
2.
Removal of body parts:
-
(a)
For amputations (siphons, thorax, etc.)
-
(b)
For chemical induction of brain degeneration.
-
Injection, in the pharyngeal region, of 3-acetylpyridine (3-AP; 65 mg/kg body weight) diluted in sterilized artificial seawater [70].
-
-
(c)
For evisceration.
-
(a)
4.2 Colonial Ascidians
Up to the half of the nineteenth century, publications reporting experiments on colonial ascidians did not provide details on the methodological approaches used to induce regeneration. Publications simply report that individuals or stolons were cut and observed in vivo. Sometimes, regenerating fragments could be labeled with vital stains such as neural red, whereas fixed specimens were labeled with carminium for whole mount analysis [21]. Below, we report the available information on the three main kinds of regeneration in colonial ascidians.
One of the first studies on partial regeneration in B. schlosseri was that of Sabbadin, in 1956 [57]. In his study, he removed all the budlets (budectomy) of a colony except one with thin tungsten needles and razor blades under a dissecting microscope. The only remaining budlet was then removed when, after 72 h, it became a bud. The atrophied buds which are normally resorbed restarted their development and, eventually, became adults. Since 1956, numerous studies used B. schlosseri as a model organism to study WBR in colonial ascidians. In 1975, Sabbadin and Zaniolo [50] removed all the zooids and buds from colonies, with needles and razor blades under a dissecting microscope, leaving only the peripheral colonial matrix, that is, the tunic and its vasculature. They observed that, in a few days, a vascular bud developed from aggregation of blood cells and generated a new zooid. The same method was used by Rinkevich and collaborators [71] in B. leachii , Brown and collaborators [72] in B. violaceus, and Sunanaga and collaborators [45,46,47] in B. primigenus. Over the past 20 years, studies on regeneration using B. schlosseri and B. leachii have been implemented using molecular and biochemical techniques, studying in detail the involvement and function of some genes in regenerative processes of this two colonial ascidian [5, 53, 73,74,75,76,77].
Studies on partial regeneration in B. schlosseri were performed by Watkins [27], who damaged, with sharpened steel needles, the colonial buds and observed that about half of them regenerated the damaged part and reached maturity. The same method was used by Kaneko and collaborators [61] to induce partial regeneration in P. misakiensis.
Up to now, the regeneration of the vascular system was studied only in B. schlosseri. Zaniolo and Trentin [64] removed the entire colonial matrix (tunic, vessels and ampullae) around some zooids using a tungsten needle under a dissection microscope and observed the full regeneration of the peripheral vessels and tunic in 5 days. The same method was used in later studies [62, 63, 65, 78].
A general methodological approach to induce regeneration in colonial ascidian can be summarized as follow:
-
1.
Collect swimming larvae and induce their metamorphosis by osmotic shock (30 s in diluted seawater 1% (w/v) of salinity) and let them to adhere on glass slide where they can grow [79].
-
2.
Maintain animals in aerated aquaria filled with filtered seawater (FSW) at a 14:10 h light–dark regimen under constant (18–20 °C) temperature. Daily, feed them with unicellular algae (e.g., Tetraselmis chuii) and change water.
-
3.
Keep colony-containing slides vertically, using plastic racks and clean them with a brush at each change of water.
-
4.
Perform operations using thin tungsten needles and razor blades under a dissection microscope.
-
5.
After surgery, keep the colonies in FSW in aerated aquaria as previously described.
For WBR
-
1.
Remove all the zooids, buds, and budlets from the colony, leaving only the colonial matrix [50].
For partial body regeneration
For circulatory system regeneration
-
1.
Remove the colonial matrix after cutting the radial vessels and the test all around the zooids [64].
5 Concluding Remarks
As evidenced by the studies reported here, tunicates exhibit remarkable regenerative abilities, which have been studied from many points of view in over a century of researches. Besides their easy rearing and maintenance under laboratory conditions, the methods to induce regeneration are relatively simple and require few and cheap tools. Moreover, among chordates, only tunicates regenerate complete adult individuals from small tissue fragments. Despite these important characteristics, many molecular tools are still missing for this group of organisms. Transgenesis is one example: this technique would allow the in vivo study of gene expression during regeneration phases. However, it is still not developed especially for colonial ascidians and many solitary species as well. Today, the improvement of imaging techniques, and the broad application of some molecular biology tools, like RNA sequencing, can speed up the advancement of knowledge in the regenerative biology of ascidians. The studies summarized here will serve as a reference and a starting point for future researches aimed to uncover the biological basic properties of the astonishing regeneration in these chordates.
References
Jeffery WR (2018) Regeneration and aging in the tunicate Ciona intestinalis. In: Conn’s handbook of models for human aging, second Edi. Elsevier Inc., Amsterdam, pp 521–531
Manni L, Anselmi C, Cima F, Gasparini F, Voskoboynik A, Martini M, Peronato A, Burighel P, Zaniolo G, Ballarin L (2019) Sixty years of experimental studies on the blastogenesis of the colonial tunicate Botryllus schlosseri. Dev Biol 448:293–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.09.009
Carnevali MDC, Burighel P (2010) Regeneration in echinoderms and ascidians. In: Encyclopedia of life sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester
Tiozzo S, Brown FD, De Tomaso AW (2008) Regeneration and stem cells in ascidians. In: Stem Cells: From Hydra to Man. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 95–112
Voskoboynik A, Simon-Blecher N, Soen Y, Rinkevich B, De Tomaso AW, Ishizuka KJ, Weissman IL (2007) Striving for normality: whole body regeneration through a series of abnormal generations. FASEB J 21:1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.06-7337com
Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H (2006) Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439:965–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04336
Delsuc F, Philippe H, Tsagkogeorga G, Simion P, Tilak M, Turon X, López-legentil S, Piette J, Lemaire P, Douzery EJP (2018) A phylogenomic framework and timescale for comparative studies of tunicates. BMC Biol 16(1):39
Alvarado AS, Tsonis PA (2006) Bridging the regeneration gap: genetic insights from diverse animal models. Nat Rev Genet 7:873–884. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1923
Seifert AW, Muneoka K (2018) The blastema and epimorphic regeneration in mammals. Dev Biol 433:190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.08.007
Alié A, Hiebert LS, Scelzo M, Tiozzo S (2020) The eventful history of nonembryonic development in tunicates. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 336(3):250–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.22940
Burighel P, Cloney RA (1997) Urochordata: Ascidiacea. Microsc Anat Invertebr Vol 15 Hemichordata. Chaetognatha, Invertebr chordates 15:221–347
Selys-Longchamps M (1915) Autotomie et régénération des viscères chez Polycarpa tenera Lacaze et Delage. C R Acad Sci Paris 160:566–569
Shenkar N, Gordon T (2015) Gut-spilling in chordates: evisceration in the tropical ascidian Polycarpa mytiligera. Sci Rep 5:9614. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09614
Gordon T, Upadhyay AK, Manni L, Huchon D, Shenkar N (2021) And then there were three…: extreme regeneration ability of the solitary chordate Polycarpa mytiligera. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:652466. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2021.652466
Voskoboynik A, Weissman IL (2015) Botryllus schlosseri, an emerging model for the study of aging, stem cells, and mechanisms of regeneration. Invertebr Reprod Dev 59:33–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2014.944673
Schultze LS (1899) Die Regeneration Des Ganglions Von Ciona intestinalis L. und. Jena Z f Naturwiss 33:263–344
Schultze LS (1900) Die Regeneration des Ganglions von Ciona intestinalis L. und über das Verhältnis der Regeneration und Knospung zur Keimblätterlehre. Jena Z Med Naturwiss 33:263–344
Hirschler J (1914) Über die Restitutions-und Involutionsvoränge bei operierten Exemplaren von Ciona intestinalis Flem. (Teil I) nebst Bemurkungen über den Wert des Negativen für das Potenzproblem. Arch Mikrosk Anat 85:205–227
Fol A (1908) Note sur la régénération de la tunique chez les Tuniciers. Bull Soc Zool Fr 33:79–81
Azéma M (1927) Sur le role des prolongements vasculaires au cours de la régénération de la tunique chez Ascidiella aspersa. Bull Soc Zool Fr 52:549–557
Brien P (1930) Régénération naturelle et expérimentale chez les Clavelinidae. Ann la Société R Zool Belgique 61:20–112
Brien P (1932) L’heteromorphose chez les Tuniciers. La regeneration bithoracique et monothoracique des fragments oesophagiens de Clavelina lepadiformis (Muller). Bull la Cl des Sci Académie R Belgique 18:975–1005
Peres JM (1948) Recherches sur la genese et la regeneration de la tunique chez Ciona intestinalis L. Bull Inst Oceanogr Monaco 145:1–12
Wagers AJ, Christensen JL, Weissman IL (2002) Cell fate determination from stem cells. Gene Ther 9:606
Deviney EM (1934) The behavior of isolated pieces of ascidian (Perophora viridis) stolon as compared with ordinary budding. J Elisha Mitchell Sci Soc 49:185–224
Berrill NJ (1951) Regeneration and budding in tunicates. Biol Rev 26:456–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.1951.tb01207.x
Mj W (1958) Regeneration of buds in Botryllus. Biol Bull 115:147–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/1539101
Wermel J (1930) Über den Einfluss der Regeneration und Überernährung auf die Siphonenlänge bei Ciona Intestinalis L. - Ein Beitrag zu Kammerers Experimenten. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org 122:22–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00576964
Whittaker JR (1975) Siphon regeneration in Ciona. Nature 255:224–225. https://doi.org/10.1038/255224a0
Sutton MF (1953) The regeneration of the siphon of Ciona intestinalis. J Mar Biol Ass UK 32:249–268
Gordon T, Manni L, Shenkar N (2019) Regeneration ability in four stolidobranch ascidians: ecological and evolutionary implications. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 519:151184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2019.151184
Jeffery WR (2015) Distal regeneration involves the age dependent activity of branchial sac stem cells in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Regeneration 2:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/reg2.26
Jeffery WR (2015) Closing the wounds: one hundred and twenty-five years of regenerative biology in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Genesis 53:48–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvg.22799
Brunetti R, Gissi C, Pennati R, Caicci F, Gasparini F, Manni L (2015) Morphological evidence that the molecularly determined Ciona intestinalis type a and type B are different species: Ciona robusta and Ciona intestinalis. J Zool Syst Evol Res 53:186–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12101
Giard A (1872) Recherches sur les Ascidies composées. Arch zool exp 1:566 ff
Driesch H (1902) Über ein neues harmonisch-äquipotentielles System und über solche Systeme überhaupt. Arch Entwickleungsmechanik der Org 14:227–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02162038
Della Valle P (1914) Studii sui rapporti fra differenziazione e rigenerazione - 3. Lo sviluppo di segmenti isolati di stolone di Clavelina di lunghezza diversa e di calibro eguale. Boll della Soc di Nat Napoli 27:195–237
Della Valle P (1915) Studii sui rapporti fra differenziazione e rigenerazione - 4. Le restituzioni dei cespugli di ramificazioni stoloniali di Clavelina. Boll della Soc dei Nat Napoli 28:49–82
Huxley JS (1921) Studies in dedifferentiation. II. Dedifferentiation and resorption in Perophora. J Cell Sci 65(260):643–697
Goldin A (1948) Regeneration in Perophora viridis. Biol Bull 94:184–193. https://doi.org/10.2307/1538246
Savigny JC (1816) Recherches anatomiques sur les ascidies composées et sur les ascidies simples - Système de la classe des Ascidies. In: Mémoires sur les Animaux sans Vertèbres, vol 2. G. Dufour, Paris, pp 1–229
Bancroft FW (1903) Aestivation of Botrylloides gascoi Della Valle. Mark Anniv, vol 147–166. H. Holt, New York
Herdman EC (1925) Botryllus. Trans Liverp Biol Soc Proc 39:201–236
Oka H, Watanabe H (1957) Vascular budding, a new type of budding in Botryllus. Biol Bull 112:225–240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1539200
Sunanaga T, Saito Y, Kawamura K (2006) Postembryonic epigenesis of vasa-positive germ cells from aggregated hemoblasts in the colonial ascidian, Botryllus primigenus. Develop Growth Differ 48:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2006.00849.x
Sunanaga T, Satoh M, Kawamura K (2008) The role of Nanos homologue in gametogenesis and blastogenesis with special reference to male germ cell formation in the colonial ascidian, Botryllus primigenus. Dev Biol 324:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.08.023
Sunanaga T, Inubushi H, Kawamura K (2010) Piwi -expressing hemoblasts serve as germline stem cells during postembryonic germ cell specification in colonial ascidian, Botryllus primigenus. Dev Growth Differ 52:603–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01196.x
Milkman R, Byrne S (1961) Recent observations on Botryllus schlosseri. Biol Bull 121:376
Milkman R (1967) Genetic and developmental studies on Botryllus schlosseri. Biol Bull 132:229–243. https://doi.org/10.2307/1539891
Sabbadin A, Zaniolo G, Majone F (1975) Determination of polarity and bilateral asymmetry in palleal and vascular buds of the ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Dev Biol 46:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/0012-1606(75)90088-3
Ricci L, Cabrera F, Lotito S, Tiozzo S (2016) Redeployment of germ layers related TFs shows regionalized expression during two non-embryonic developments. Dev Biol 416:235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.05.016
Kassmer SH, Langenbacher AD, De Tomaso AW (2020) Integrin-alpha-6+ candidate stem cells are responsible for whole body regeneration in the invertebrate chordate Botrylloides diegensis. Nat Commun 11:4435. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18288-w
Rosner A, Kravchenko O, Rinkevich B (2019) IAP genes partake weighty roles in the astogeny and whole body regeneration in the colonial urochordate Botryllus schlosseri. Dev Biol 448:320–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.10.015
Majone F (1977) Regeneration of isolated bud fragments of Botryllus schlosseri. Acta Embryol Exp (Palermo):11–19
Ries E (1937) Untersuchungen Über den Zelltod II - Das Verhalten differenzierter und undifferenzierter Zellen bei der Regeneration, Reduktion und Knospung von Clavelina lepadiformis. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org 137:327–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593065
Scelzo M, Alié A, Pagnotta S, Lejeune C, Henry P, Gilletta L, Hiebert LS, Mastrototaro F, Tiozzo S (2019) Novel budding mode in Polyandrocarpa zorritensis: a model for comparative studies on asexual development and whole body regeneration. EvoDevo 10:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13227-019-0121-x
Sabbadin A (1956) Effetti dell’estirpazione delle gemme sulla durata del ciclo vitale in Botryllus schlosseri (pallas). Bolletino di Zool 23:331–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/11250005609439244
Sabbadin A (1958) Analisi sperimentale dello sviluppo delle colonie di Botryllus schlosseri (Pallas) [Ascidiacea]. Arch Ital Anat Embriol 58:177–221
Brien P (1933) Regeneration thoracique chez Archiascidia neapolitana (Julin) Structure du Système nerveux central. Bull Biol Fr Belg 67:100–124
Kawamura K, Hashimoto K, Nakauchi M (1995) Development of irradiated tunicate buds: is cell division cycle required for morphallaxis? Develop Growth Differ 37:487–496. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-169X.1995.t01-4-00003.x
Kaneko N, Katsuyama Y, Kawamura K, Fujiwara S (2010) Regeneration of the gut requires retinoic acid in the budding ascidian Polyandrocarpa misakiensis. Develop Growth Differ 52:457–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-169X.2010.01184.x
Tiozzo S, Voskoboynik A, Brown FD, De Tomaso AW (2008) A conserved role of the VEGF pathway in angiogenesis of an ectodermally-derived vasculature. Dev Biol 315:243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.12.035
Braden BP, Taketa DA, Pierce JD, Kassmer S, Lewis DD, De Tomaso AW (2014) Vascular regeneration in a basal chordate is due to the presence of immobile, bi-functional cells. PLoS One 9:e95460. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0095460
Zaniolo G, Trentin P (1987) Regeneration of the tunic in the colonial ascidian, Botryllus schlosseri. Acta Embryol Morphol Exper 8:173–180
Gasparini F, Burighel P, Manni L, Zaniolo G (2008) Vascular regeneration and angiogenic-like sprouting mechanism in a compound ascidian is similar to vertebrates. Evol Dev 10:591–605. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00274.x
Bourchard-Madrelle C (1966) Régéneration de l’ovaire chez une ascidie simple Ciona intestinalis L. (Protochordé). Bull Soc Zool Fr 91:107–114
Bollner T, Beesley PW, Thorndyke MC (1992) Pattern of substance P- and cholecystokinin-like immunoreactivity during regeneration of the neural complex in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. J Comp Neurol 325:572–580
Bollner T, Howalt S, Thorndyke MC, Beesley PW (1995) Regeneration and post-metamorphic development of the central nervous system in the protochordate Ciona intestinalis: a study with monoclonal antibodies. Cell Tissue Res 279:421–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00318500
Dahlberg C, Auger H, Dupont S, Sasakura Y, Thorndyke M, Joly JS (2009) Refining the Ciona intestinalis model of central nervous system regeneration. PLoS One 4:e4458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004458
Medina BNSP, Santos de Abreu I, Cavalcante LA, Silva WAB, da Fonseca RN, Allodi S, de Barros CM (2015) 3-acetylpyridine-induced degeneration in the adult ascidian neural complex: reactive and regenerative changes in glia and blood cells. Dev Neurobiol 75:877–893. https://doi.org/10.1002/dneu.22255
Rinkevich B, Shlemberg Z, Fishelson L (1995) Whole-body protochordate regeneration from totipotent blood cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:7695–7699. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.17.7695
Brown FD, Keeling EL, Le AD, Swalla BJ (2009) Whole body regeneration in a colonial ascidian, Botrylloides violaceus. J Exp Zool Part B Mol Dev Evol 312:885–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.21303
Rinkevich Y, Paz G, Rinkevich B, Reshef R (2007) Systemic bud induction and retinoic acid signaling underlie whole body regeneration in the urochordate Botrylloides leachi. PLoS Biol 5:e71. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050071
Rinkevich Y, Rosner A, Rabinowitz C, Lapidot Z, Moiseeva E, Rinkevich B (2010) Piwi positive cells that line the vasculature epithelium, underlie whole body regeneration in a basal chordate. Dev Biol 345:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.500
Ricci L, Chaurasia A, Lapébie P, Dru P, Helm RR, Copley RR, Tiozzo S (2016) Identification of differentially expressed genes from multipotent epithelia at the onset of an asexual development. Sci Rep 6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27357
Zondag LE, Rutherford K, Gemmell NJ, Wilson MJ (2016) Uncovering the pathways underlying whole body regeneration in a chordate model, Botrylloides leachi using de novo transcriptome analysis. BMC Genomics 17:114. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2435-6
Zondag L, Clarke RM, Wilson MJ (2019) Histone deacetylase activity is required for Botrylloides leachii whole-body regeneration. J Exp Biol 222:jeb203620. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203620
Gasparini F, Caicci F, Rigon F, Zaniolo G, Manni L (2014) Testing an unusual in vivo vessel network model: a method to study angiogenesis in the colonial tunicate Botryllus schlosseri. Sci Rep 4:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06460
Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (1987) The fate of Botryllus (Ascidiacea) larvae co-settled with parental colonies: beneficial or deleterious consequences? Biol Bull 173:474–488
Auger H, Sasakura Y, Joly J-S, Jeffery WR (2010) Regeneration of oral siphon pigment organs in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Dev Biol 339:374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.12.040
Jeffery WR (2015) Regeneration, stem cells, and aging in the tunicate Ciona: Insights from the Oral Siphon. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 319:255–282
Jeffery WR (2015) The tunicate Ciona: a model system for understanding the relationship between regeneration and aging. Invertebr Reprod Dev 59:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2014.925515
Hamada M, Goricki S, Byerly MS, Satoh N, Jeffery WR (2015) Evolution of the chordate regeneration blastema: differential gene expression and conserved role of notch signaling during siphon regeneration in the ascidian Ciona. Dev Biol 405:304–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.07.017
Spina EJ, Guzman E, Zhou H, Kosik KS, Smith WC (2017) A microRNA-mRNA expression network during oral siphon regeneration in Ciona. Development 144:1787–1797. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.144097
Driesch H (1905) Skizzen zur Restitutionslehre. Arch Entwicklungsmechanik der Org 20:21–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02162639
Driesch H (1902) Studien über das Regulationsvermögen der Organismen. Arch Entwicklungsmechanik der Org 14:532–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02188502
Schultz E (1907) Über Reductionen - III. Die Reduction und Regeneration des abgeschnittenen Kiemenkorbes von Clavellina lepadiformis. Arch Entwicklungsmechanik der Org 24:503–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289889
Spek J (1927) Über die Winterknospenentwicklung, Regeneration und Reduktion bei Clavellina lepadiformis und die Bedeutung besonderer “omnipotenter” Zellelemente für diese Vorgänge. Wilhelm Roux’Archiv Entwicklungsmechanik der Org 111(119):172
Fischer I (1937) Über das Verhalten des stolonialen Gewebes der Ascidie Clavelina lepadiformis in vitro. Wilhelm Roux Arch Entwickl Mech Org 137:383–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00593068
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank the COST Action MARISTEM 16203 community for supporting short term scientific missions and useful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s)
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Vanni, V., Ballarin, L., Gasparini, F., Peronato, A., Manni, L. (2022). Studying Regeneration in Ascidians: An Historical Overview. In: Blanchoud, S., Galliot, B. (eds) Whole-Body Regeneration. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 2450. Humana, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2172-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-2172-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-2171-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-2172-1
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols