Abstract
Neointimal hyperplasia is a leading cause of bypass failure in the intermediate postoperative period (2–24 months). In prosthetic bypasses, neointimal hyperplasia is most likely to develop at the level of the distal anastomosis. Several techniques have been developed in an attempt to improve the patency of infrainguinal prosthetic bypasses. These techniques involve incorporating a segment of vein between the prosthetic bypass and the recipient artery. The theory behind these techniques is that the interposition of the vein segment may ameliorate the future development of neointimal hyperplasia at the level of the distal anastomosis. In addition, incorporating the vein segment could facilitate the construction of the distal anastomosis and improve bypass patency in the immediate postoperative period. Although these techniques were often used, there are very few prospective randomized trials to date that show their efficacy. Furthermore, there are no prospective randomized trials that compare these various techniques in an attempt to identify which technique is best. With the advancement of endovascular technology and the availability of aggressive infrainguinal and infrapopliteal revascularization options, including retrograde pedal and popliteal access, tibial prosthetic bypasses are rarely performed nowadays. Nevertheless, when used as a last resort prior to an amputation, adjunctive techniques may be useful.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Neointimal hyperplasia is a leading cause of bypass failure in the intermediate postoperative period (2–24 months). In prosthetic bypasses, neointimal hyperplasia is most likely to develop at the level of the distal anastomosis. Several techniques have been developed in an attempt to improve the patency of infrainguinal prosthetic bypasses [1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. These techniques involve incorporating a segment of vein between the prosthetic bypass and the recipient artery. The theory behind these techniques is that the interposition of the vein segment may ameliorate the future development of neointimal hyperplasia at the level of the distal anastomosis. In addition, incorporating the vein segment could facilitate the construction of the distal anastomosis and improve bypass patency in the immediate postoperative period. Although these techniques were often used, there are very few prospective randomized trials to date that show their efficacy [1, 2, 3]. Furthermore, there are no prospective randomized trials that compare these various techniques in an attempt to identify which technique is best. With the advancement of endovascular technology and the availability of aggressive infrainguinal and infrapopliteal revascularization options, including retrograde pedal and popliteal access, tibial prosthetic bypasses are rarely performed nowadays. Nevertheless, when used as a last resort prior to an amputation, adjunctive techniques may be useful.
Linton Patch
In one technique (section “Linton Patch”), a vein patch angioplasty is initially performed at the site selected for the distal anastomosis. An incision is created in the patch and used as the new site for constructing the anastomosis. The graft is then sutured to the vein patch. This technique is often referred to as the “Linton patch” technique [1, 3, 4]. It is relatively simple to perform and can facilitate the construction of the anastomosis, especially in a heavily calcified vessel.
Miller Cuff
Another technique involves suturing a segment of vein to the arteriotomy at the site selected for the distal anastomosis as a collar or a cuff. The graft is then sutured to the vein cuff. This technique originally described by Siegman is usually referred to as the “Miller cuff technique” [5, 7]. Several modifications of this technique have been described. The simplest method to perform is illustrated in section “Miller Cuff.” St. Mary’s boot, another modification of the Miller cuff, is also described in section “Miller Cuff” [5].
Taylor Patch
Another technique involves constructing the distal anastomosis directly between the graft and the artery. An incision is then created in the graft at the level of the distal anastomosis and extended through the apex for 1–2 cm into the outflow artery. A vein patch angioplasty of the incision is then performed. This method is referred to as the “Taylor patch” (section “Taylor Patch”) [9]. This technique can be technically demanding and requires mobilization of a long segment of artery in order to construct the anastomosis.
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Linton Patch
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Linton Patch
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff Modification
St. Mary’s Boot
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Miller Cuff Modification
St. Mary’s Boot
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Taylor Patch
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Taylor Patch
Vein Patches And Cuffs
Taylor Patch
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Poor distal runoff is often cited as a cause of infrainguinal prosthetic bypass failure. Several techniques have been developed in an attempt to improve the patency of prosthetic bypasses with disadvantaged outflow tracts. The main concept of these techniques is the creation of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula to improve the outflow and decrease the distal vascular resistance [12].
In one technique, after constructing the distal anastomosis between the prosthetic graft and the recipient artery, an arteriovenous fistula is constructed a few centimeters distal to the anastomosis [14]. This arteriovenous (AV) fistula can be constructed in a side-to-side fashion (Figure 13.1A) as described in Chap. 11.
The arteriovenous fistula can also be constructed by dividing the vein and joining its proximal end to the artery, a few centimeters distal to the anastomosis using an end-to-side configuration (Figure 13.1B).
In other techniques, the arteriovenous fistula is incorporated in the construction of the distal anastomosis (Figure 13.2) [12, 13]. In one variation, the arteriovenous fistula is constructed in a side-to-side fashion (section “Vein Patches and Cuffs”). An incision is created in the artery at the site selected for the distal anastomosis. A matching incision is created in the vein accompanying the artery. The adjacent walls of the artery and the vein are sutured together, resulting in a combined opening into the artery and the vein. The graft is then sutured to this newly created opening, allowing the blood to flow into the artery and the vein simultaneously. The size of the fistula can be theoretically controlled by changing the length of the venotomy. The longer the size of the venotomy, the larger is the fistula. One advantage of this technique is that it involves adding only one additional suture line between the adjacent walls of the artery and the vein. The disadvantage of this technique is that the prosthetic bypass is connected directly to the artery without the potential theoretical benefit of an interposed vein segment.
Another variation described by Ascer involves incorporating the concept of vein cuff and the concept of arteriovenous fistula together (section “Arteriovenous Fistulae”) [11]. In this method, one of the veins accompanying the artery is mobilized for several centimeters. An arteriotomy is created in the artery at the site selected for the distal anastomosis. The vein is transected and sutured to the artery in an end-to-side manner. It is important to mobilize the vein for a long segment to allow for a gentle curve of the vein over the artery. A venotomy is created in the hood of the vein and will serve as the new site for constructing the anastomosis with the prosthetic graft (Figure 13.3a). The graft is then sutured to the venotomy. Although this technique involves creating an additional anastomosis, it has several attractive features. The anastomosis between the vein and the artery and the anastomosis between the bypass and the vein are conducted by following the same principles of any end-to-side anastomosis. Surgeons are familiar with this type of reconstruction, which can be carried out even in heavily calcified vessels. The anastomosis between the graft and the vein can be accomplished with relative ease and expediency. At the completion of the anastomoses, the flow and the magnitude of the fistula can be controlled by banding of the fistula. The pressure in the graft is measured and compared to the radial artery pressure. Banding is considered unnecessary if the gradient is less than 30 mmHg, or if the pressure in the graft is greater than 100 mmHg. Banding can be accomplished by placing a 4-mm polytetrafluroethylene cuff (PTFE) ring around the vein (Figure 13.3b).
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Side-to-Side
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Side-to-Side
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Side-to-Side
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Side-to-Side
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Side-to-Side
Arteriovenous Fistulae
Side-to-Side
References
Vein Patches and Cuffs
Batson RC, Sottiurai VS, Craighead CC. Linton patch angioplasty; an adjunct to distal bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Ann Vasc Surg. 1984;199:684–93.
Harris PL, Bakran A, Enabi L, Nott DM. ePTFE grafts for femoro-crural bypass-improved results with combined adjuvant venous cuff and arteriovenous fistula? Br J Surg. 1983;70(6):377.
Linton RR, Wilde WL. Modifications in the technique for femoropopliteal saphenous vein bypass autografts. Surgery (St.Louis). 1970;67:234–48.
Linton RR, Darling RC. Autogenous saphenous vein bypass grafts in femoropopliteal obliterative arterial disease. Surgery (St. Louis). 1962;51:62–73.
Miller JH, Foreman RK, Ferguson L, Faris I. Interposition vein cuff for anastomosis of prosthesis to small artery. Aust NZJ Surg. 1984;54:283–5.
Raptis S, Miller JH. Influence of vein cuff on polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for primary femoropopliteal bypass. Br J Surg. 1995;82:478–91.
Siegman FA. Use of the venous cuff for graft anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1979;148:930.
Stonebride PA, Howlett R, Prestcott R, et al. Randomised trial comparing polytetrafluoroethylene graft patients with and without Miller cuff. Br J Surg. 1995;2:555–6.
Taylor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, et al. Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: long term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg. 1992;79:348–54.
Wijesinghe LD, Beardsmore DM, Scott DJ. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) femorodistal grafts with a distal vein cuff for critical ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15(5):449–53.
REFERENCES
Ascer E, Gennaro M, Polina R, et al. Complementary distal arteriovenous fistula and deep vein interposition: a five-year experience with a new technique to improve infrapopliteal prosthetic bypass patency. J Vasc Surg. 1996;24:134–43.
Dean RE, Read RC. The influence of increased blood flow on thrombosis in prosthetic grafts. Surgery. 1964;55:581–4.
Harris PL, Campbell H. Adjuvant distal arteriovenous shunt with femorotibial bypass for critical ischaemia. Br J Surg. 1983;70(6):377.
Paty PSK, Shah DM, et al. Remote distal arteriovenous fistula to improve infrapopliteal bypass patency. J Vasc Surg. 1990;1:171–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoballah, J.J. (2021). Adjunctive Techniques: Distal Anastomosis of an Infrainguinal Prosthetic Bypass. In: Hoballah, J.J., Bechara, C.F. (eds) Vascular Reconstructions. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1089-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-1089-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-0716-1087-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-0716-1089-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)