Abstract
Recent advances in next generation sequencing (NRG) have provided compelling evidence that endometrial cancers result from heterogeneous somatic mutations. These findings argue that a catalog of molecular aberrations that cause endometrial cancer is critical for the proper classification of these tumors and for developing novel and more effective targeted therapies against this disease. This chapter summarizes the recent advances made toward the elucidation of underlying pathway aberrations and the development of targeted therapies that exploit the unique molecular characteristics of endometrial cancers.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Endometrial cancers have historically been designated as Type I or Type II [1]. Type I endometrial cancer account for 65–70 % of cases and is associated with grade 1–2 endometrioid histology, younger age of onset, retention of estrogen receptor (ER), and progesterone receptor (PR) status, a history of unopposed estrogen, and deletions in k-Ras, PTEN, or mismatch repair mechanisms [2,3,4]. In contrast, Type II endometrial cancer is associated with serous, clear cell or grade 3 endometrioid histology, loss of ER/PR, black race, absence of unopposed estrogen, presentation at later stage, reduced E-cadherin expression, aneuploidy, mutations in p53, and HER2/Neu overexpression [5,6,7,8,9]. Type II endometrial cancer is typically more aggressive than type I cancer and has a poorer prognosis.
Recently, using an integrated genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic approach, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network provided compelling evidence that endometrial cancers result from heterogeneous somatic mutations and, accordingly, classified endometrial cancers into four categories: (1) polymerase epsilon (POLε)-ultramutated, (2) microsatellite instability hypermutated, (3) copy-number low, and (4) copy-number high, serous-like [10]. The genetic aberrations of endometrial carcinomas may therefore represent a better tool to classify these tumors and guide adjuvant treatment for women harboring biologically aggressive disease. In this chapter, we discuss some of the new molecular pathways/targets identified in endometrial cancer and the state-of-the-art of both preclinical and clinical achievements in molecular-targeted therapy.
Molecular Pathways and Targets
Mismatch Repair Genes and POLε Mutations
Microsatellite instability (MSI), or alterations in the length of short repetitive deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) sequences, is a result of the lack of intact DNA mismatch repair (MMR), which is an essential system for correcting DNA sequence errors during replication. The DNA MMR system may become disabled through intragenic mutations or promoter hypermethylation of one of the DNA MMR genes (e.g., MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2). POLε and polymerase δ (POLD) constitute the two nuclear DNA polymerases present in eukaryotic cells endowed with intrinsic proofreading activity [11, 12]. These polymerases are responsible for the bulk of chromosomal DNA synthesis during cell division, and multiple studies in yeast and mammalian cells have shown that polymerase proofreading and postreplication mismatch repair represent the primary guardians of DNA replication fidelity [11, 12]. In addition, loss of function in one or both of these genes dramatically increases the number of spontaneous mutations [11, 12]. Recent TCGA Research Network data demonstrated that 40 % of endometrial endometrioid tumors (i.e., Type I) and 2 % of the high-copy number serous-like tumors (i.e., Type II) are MSI hypermutated while about 10 % of endometrial cancers harbor POLε driver mutations [10]. In this study, MSI endometrial cancers were characterized by endometrioid histology, a lower MLH1 mRNA expression, and high frequency of somatic mutations (i.e., approximately tenfold greater than microsatellite stable (MSS) endometrial tumors) [10]. In contrast, POLε mutations were common in both type I and type II endometrial cancers [10, 12,13,14] and conferred an ultramutator phenotype that allowed incipient cancer cells to accumulate additional cancer-promoting mutations (i.e., the number of somatic mutations in POLε-mutated tumors exceed by far those found in MSI-mutated patients) [10]. Importantly, MSI hypermutated and POLε ultramutated endometrial cancer patients experienced a very good prognosis regardless of the fact that a large number of these patients harbored poorly differentiated endometrial tumors [10, 12,13,14]. It is currently not understood why patients developing MSI hypermutated or POLε ultramutated phenotypes may have such a good outcome; however, it is possible that the large number of somatic mutations present in these tumors may render these cancers highly immunogenic for the host due to the large number of mutated epitopes [15]. Thus, it may be unlikely to spread or metastasize due to their extremely high number of mutations [16]. Importantly, if the former hypothesis proves to be correct, the high mutation burden of these tumors, similar to what was recently demonstrated for melanoma and lung cancer patients, may confer clinical benefit to these patients if/when novel immunotherapeutic approaches based on blocking immune checkpoints antibodies (i.e., anti-CTLA4-ipilimumab, anti-PD1-nivolumab, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) are implemented [17]. Alternatively, if the latter hypothesis is correct, as with breast and ovarian cancer patients harboring homologous recombination defects (i.e., BRCA1/2 mutations), synthetic lethality might be explored to develop targeted therapy effective in MSI and POLε-mutated endometrial cancers [18, 19].
Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) and Phosphatidylinositol-4,5-Bisphosphate 3-Kinase, Catalytic Subunit Alpha (PI3KCA) and Regulatory Subunit (PI3KR1)
Cancer genetic studies suggest that the Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) and the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) genes are two of the most frequently mutated genes in human tumors. TCGA data showed that up to 93 % of endometrial tumors had mutations in the PTEN/PI3K pathway suggesting the potential for targeted therapy with inhibitors against PI3K, AKT, or mTOR pathways in these tumors [10].
PTEN gene loss of activity is due to mutations in up to 61% [20,21,22] and due to a loss of heterozygosity in 40 % of cases [23]. PTEN protein acts as a lipid and protein phosphatase, and functions and behaves similar to a tumor suppressor gene. The lipid phosphatase activity of PTEN causes cell cycle arrest at the G1/S checkpoint; the protein phosphatase activity of PTEN is involved in the inhibition of adhesion formation, cell migration, and the inhibition of growth factor-stimulated MAPK signaling. PTEN protein also antagonizes the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway by dephosphorylating phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate (PIP3). This dephosphorylation results in inhibition of AKT. Thus, loss of PTEN function leads to increased levels of phospho-AKT, activation of anti-apoptotic proteins, and ultimately an increase in cell cycle progression [24]. In atypical hyperplasia, PTEN inactivation occurs in up to 50 % of the cases. PTEN mutations are also found in simple hyperplasia and are partially associated with monoclonality [25]. Therefore, PTEN inactivation and mutations may be identified in endometrioid adenocarcinoma precursor lesions.
The phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K CA ) gene encodes for a heterodimeric protein with an 85-kDa regulatory subunit (PI3KR1) and a 110-kDa catalytic subunit (PI3KCA) [26, 27]. In endometrial cancers, unlike other human tumors, PI3KCA and PI3KR1 mutations are often associated with PTEN mutations. This is common in both type I and type II tumors [28]. PI3K phosphorylates a series of membrane phospholipids, catalyzing the transfer of ATP (adenosine triphosphate)-derived phosphate thereby forming secondary messenger lipids phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate [25,26,27,28]. PI3K plays a central role in cellular proliferation, growth, survival, mobility, and metabolism via activation of the PTEN/AKT pathway. PI3K is activated via the binding of a ligand to its cognate receptor, which attracts a series of kinases to the plasma membrane thereby initiating the downstream AKT/mTOR signaling cascade that regulates cell growth.
The central role of PI3K activation in tumor cell biology has prompted an effort to target PI3K and/or downstream kinases such as AKT and mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) in endometrial cancer. As a result, apitolisib (GDC-0980, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), a potent inhibitor of class I PI3K and mTOR kinase (TORC1/2), has recently been tested in preclinical studies and not-surprisingly, has shown significant activity in vitro and in vivo against endometrial tumors harboring PI3K driver mutations [29]. Furthermore, AZD8055, a novel dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor, showed significant tumor growth inhibition in high HER-2/neu-expressor endometrial cancers in vitro [30] and caused in vivo regression in breast, lung, colon, prostate, and uterine xenograft models [31]. Taselisib, GDC-0032 (Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), a novel, oral, selective inhibitor of PI3K, has been shown to be highly active in vivo in uterine serous carcinoma (USC) mouse xenografts harboring PI3KCA mutations and overexpressing HER2/neu (p = 0.007) [32]. Multiple phase I, II, and III clinical trials with inhibitors targeting PI3K, AKT, or mTOR pathways are currently ongoing or have been recently completed [33]. Unfortunately, emerging clinical data show limited single-agent activity of such inhibitors at tolerated doses [34,35,36]. However, it is important to note that the response rate for patients with heavily pretreated, advanced cancers and PI3KCA mutations who were given PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis inhibitors was significantly higher than that for patients without documented PI3KCA mutations treated on the same trials [36]. This observation is consistent with data that demonstrate low response rates on traditional phase I and II trials, in which molecular testing is not used, and suggests that selecting PI3KCA-mutant patients for treatment with PI3K/AKT/mTOR axis inhibitors may potentially predict response. Taken together, these results imply that screening for PI3KCA and PI3KR1 mutations may warrant further investigation in the application of targeted PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors to the clinic in endometrial cancer patients.
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR; ErbB-1; HER1)
The ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase family consists of four cell surface receptors: ErbB-1 or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or HER1, ErbB2 or HER2/neu, ErbB-3, and ErbB4. Type I tumors are more likely to exhibit mutations in EGFR when compared to Type II tumors (46 % versus 34 %) [37]. EGFR is a membrane receptor that lies upstream to the PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Ras-Raf-MEK-ERK pathways. After ligand binding, EGFR becomes active as a homodimer. It may also pair with another member of the ErbB receptor family, such as ErbB2/Her2/neu, and become an activated heterodimer. In type II tumors, EGFR expression correlates with survival (p = 0.028) [38]. Therefore, EGFR is a therapeutic target of significant interest.
As reported by Schwab et al., the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) afatinib (Gilotrif™, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ridgefield, CT) and neratinib (Puma Biotechnology, Los Angeles, CA) both exhibit significant tumor growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo models of USC harboring overexpression of EGFR and HER2/neu [39, 40]. In addition, in vivo models showed improved survival when using both agents independently. Afatinib works by covalently binding to intracellular phosphorylation sites of ErbB1, ErbB2, and ErbB4, as well as inhibiting trans-phosphorylation of ErbB3. Neratinib is an irreversible inhibitor of ErbB1 and HER2/neu, and prevents activation of the signaling pathways brought about by receptor dimerization.
HER2/neu (ErbB-2)
The HER2 protein has a cysteine-rich extracellular ligand-binding domain, a hydrophobic membrane-spanning region, and an intracellular tyrosine kinase domain. In HER2-amplified cells, there may be up to 100 C-ErBB2 gene copies per tumor cell [41] compared with two copies present in normal cells. This overamplification results in HER2 overexpression at both the mRNA and protein levels and a resultant phosphorylation of intracellular tyrosine kinase residues [42]. This modulates cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and survival in addition to upregulating the Ras/Raf/MAPK and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways. In many solid tumors, HER2 expression status is now determined using immunohistochemistry (IHC), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays in instances of equivocal IHC results, though no standard guidelines exist for HER2 testing in endometrial cancer [43]. HER2 overexpression correlates with prognosis [44]. Thus, given that up to 69 % of all endometrial cancers and up to 80 % of type II endometrial tumors overexpress HER2, it is an important molecular target for therapy.
Trastuzumab (Herceptin®, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) is an FDA-approved HER2-targeting antibody that is approved for use as an adjuvant in early-stage, HER2-positive, node-positive breast cancer [45]. There have been multiple encouraging case reports using trastuzumab in USC [46,47,48], and the effect on progression-free survival in advanced or recurrent USC is currently being evaluated in a multi-institutional phase II trial of trastuzumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin alone [49]. Pertuzumab (Omnitarg®, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody heterodimerization inhibitor that binds domain II of the ErbB2 receptor. When compared to trastuzumab, pertuzumab inhibits broader downstream signal transduction pathways through abrogation of lateral signal transduction [50,51,52]. Lapatinib (Tykerb®, GlaxoSmithKlein, Philadelphia, PA), a reversible dual inhibitor of both HER2 and EGFR, has shown the ability to restore trastuzumab sensitivity in cells that have previously shown resistance to trastuzumab therapy [53]. As clinical trials move forward, these agents will play a significant role in targeted therapy.
Trastuzumab is also used as a vehicle in the antibody-drug-conjugate trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla®, T-DM1, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA). DM1 belongs to the maytansine class of cytotoxic agents. T-DM1 is internalized by HER2 receptor-mediated endocytosis, offering selective effects on HER2-overexpressing cells. After internalization, T-DM1 is degraded by lysosomes, resulting in the release of free intracellular DM1. DM1 is a microtubule assembly inhibitor and its action leads to cell death as a result of G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. [54, 55] T-DM1 also has action similar to trastuzumab alone with regard to reducing signaling in the HER2 pathway and initiation of antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity [56,57,58]. In 2014, English et al. showed significant activity of T-DM1 in vitro and in vivo in USC [59]. T-DM1 was more effective than trastuzumab in inhibiting cell proliferation and causing apoptosis (p = 0.004) in USC overexpressing HER2. T-DM1 was highly active at reducing tumor formation in USC xenografts overexpressing HER2 (p = 0.04) and mice treated with TDM-1 had significantly longer survival when compared to mice treated with trastuzumab alone and untreated control mice (p ≤ 0.0001). These are promising results that will undoubtedly be further evaluated in clinical trials.
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
When the core of a tumor attains a critical level of hypoxia, neoangiogenesis occurs as an effort to promote tumor growth, progression, and metastasis. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) enhances vascular permeability, vasodilation, and capillary fenestration and is a prime target for modulation. The VEGF family consists of six members: VEGF-A, VEGF-B, VEGF-C, VEGF-D, VEGF-E, and PIGF and their respective receptors (VEGFR) [60]. In endometrial cancer, VEGF-A overexpression is a poor prognostic indicator and is associated with advanced grade, lymphovascular space invasion and spread [61, 62], and upregulation of p53 [63].
Bevacizumab (Avastin®, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA) is a recombinant IgG1 monoclonal antibody that neutralizes VEGF and has shown promising results in multiple phase II trials for recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma. For example, in Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trials 229G and 229E, bevacizumab was used alone [64] and in combination with temsirolimus [65], respectively. As a stand-alone treatment of 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks in patients with two or three prior lines of chemotherapy, bevacizumab exhibited a 13.5 % response rate [64]. Bevacizumab, 10 mg/kg given biweekly as a combination with temsirolimus 25 mg weekly, showed improved outcomes; 24.5 % of patients exhibited a clinical response and 46.9 % of patients achieved a progression free survival of 6 months or more [65]. A three-arm randomized phase II study of paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab, paclitaxel/carboplatin/temsirolimus, and ixabepilone/carboplatin/bevacizumab as initial therapy for measurable stage III/IV or recurrent endometrial cancer is ongoing [66]. The results of this study are eagerly awaited by the oncology community.
Other VEGF-related therapies are being developed as well. VEGF Trap (Eylea®, afibercept, Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France) is a monocolonal IgG fusion protein that serves as a decoy receptor for VEGFR-1 and -2; ramucirumab (Cyramza®, Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN) is a mononcolonal antibody that targets VEGFR-2. In a phase II study of 44 women with recurrent or persistent uterine cancer using aflibercept, 6-month progression-free survival was 41 % and overall response rate was 7 % (all partial responses); there were two treatment-related deaths due to gastrointestinal perforation and arterial rupture [67]. While not yet reported in endometrial adenocarcinomas, Cyramza® yielded promising improvements in progression-free survival relative to placebo in the phase III REGARD trial in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or GE junction adenocarcinoma who had progressed on or after prior fluoropyrimidine- or platinum-containing chemotherapy [68]. Powell et al. recently reported a response rate of 18.6 % in patients with recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma who received brivaniv, an oral dual anti-VEGF and weak anti-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) agent [69].
FBXW7/Cyclin E/PPP2RA1
In uterine serous carcinoma, whole-exome and Sanger sequencing have revealed mutations in FBXW7 (19 %) and PPP2R1A (18 %) in both carcinomas and matched precursor endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma [70]. FBXW7 is an F-box protein that is critical in the ubiquitination of the tumor-promoting proteins cyclin E and PPP2R1A [71,72,73]. CCNE1 encodes cyclin E1, the upregulation of which promotes cell cycle progression through the G1 phase via interactions with CDK-1 [71]. PPP2R1A is a regulatory unit of serine/threonine protein phosphatase 2, which regulates growth. In USC, mutations in PPP2R1A have been reported in up to 32 % of tumors and somatic amplifications of CCNE1 were identified in up to 44 % [74,75,76]. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors may have a role for use in USC. In addition, curcumin has been proposed as a regulator of the proteasome and cyclin family of cell cycle proteins [77], yielding yet another potential therapeutic intervention.
Skp2 E3 Ligase Inhibitors
The F-box protein, Skp2, a component of the SCF-Skp2/Cks1 E3 ligase complex, has specificity for the tumor suppressor and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27kip1 (p27) causing its ubiquitylation and subsequent degradation by the 26S proteasome [78, 79]. Normally, the levels of p27 increase in the nucleus and bind to and inactivate CyclinE/Cdk2 maintaining the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) in a hypophosphorylated state for cell cycle arrest [80]. Accordingly, p27 nuclear expression is low in proliferative phase endometrium and high in the secretory phase [81,82,83,84]. In endometrial cancer and other cancers, there is a statistically significant decrease in p27 with a concomitant increase in Skp2 [85,86,87,88]. This loss of p27 is caused by its perpetual degradation in the nucleus due to high Skp2/Cks1 E3 ligase activity ultimately leading to uncontrolled proliferation [89]. Knocking down Skp2 in endometrial cancer cell lines completely obviates estrogen-induced degradation of p27 and growth stimulation. Moreover, estrogen causes MAPK-dependent phosphorylation of p27 on threonine 187, which is essential for its identification and ubiquitylation by SCF-Skp2/Cks1 [89]. These results purport a pathogenic mechanism for estrogen-induced type I endometrial cancer, representing 85 % of uterine cancers and thus, blocking nuclear p27 degradation by Skp2/Cks1 is a rational molecular target for this cancer [90, 91].
Whereas unopposed estrogen increases the risk for developing endometrial hyperplasia, the precursor to type I endometrial cancer [91], ostensibly due to degradation of p27, progesterone treatment increases the level of nuclear p27 with concomitant inhibition of proliferation in primary endometrial cancer cells [84, 89]. Progesterone therapy (Megace®) for hyperplasia and cancer is associated with an increase in nuclear p27 [92, 93], thereby underscoring the significance of p27 as a molecular target forendometrial growth. Of note, the PTEN tumor suppressor and p27, which both negatively control cell cycle progression, malfunction as an early event in endometrial cancer oncogenesis [94], and it has been shown that Skp2 functions in the regulation of p27 and cell proliferation by the PTEN/PI3K pathway [95]. Rather than regulation of cell proliferation by transcription and translation [89], the studies point to the Ubiquitin Proteasome System as the essential regulator of normal and malignant endometrial epithelial cell growth supporting the use of proteasome inhibitors as a rational therapeutic approach for endometrial cancer and others with loss of p27 due to high Skp2/Cks1 E3 ligase activity.
The first general proteasome inhibitor for cancer therapy, bortezomib (Velcade, PS-431) was approved for multiple myeloma [96], but is marginally effective and failed for other cancers because they ostensibly blocked the degradation of both oncogenes and tumor suppressors [97]. Aided by X-ray crystallographic studies, Skp2 and Cks1 of the SCF complex form a structural druggable pocket where p27 is ubiquitylate [98,99,100]. Computational ligand docking of the structure of the interface between Skp2/Cks1 and p27, and a virtual ligand screen (VLS) was used to identify small molecule inhibitors that specifically block degradation of p27 phosphorylated on Threonine 187 [100]. Unlike other SCF-Skp2 complexes that target a variety of proteins for degradation, importantly, the pocket formed by Skp2/Cks1 has substrate specificity for ubiquitylating only the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors p27 and p21 [99]. Another means for disabling p27 from arresting cell growth is its sequestration in the cytoplasm in some cancers including endometrial cancer [87, 101, 102]. Cytoplasmic mislocalization occurs when p27 is phosphorylated on threonine 157 by Akt kinase activity. This aligns with the loss of PTEN phosphatase function in blocking PI3K/Akt in endometrial cancers [91]. In the cytoplasm, p27 not only loses its nuclear anti-proliferative effect but assumes an oncogenic phenotype mediating migration/metastasis [101, 102]. Fortuitously, certain Skp2 inhibitors increase nuclear p27 while decreasing cytoplasmic p27 in endometrial carcinoma patient primary cells [103]. Thus, these inhibitors might have dual therapeutic advantages as both cytostatic as well as anti-metastatic agents.
In vitro, the novel small molecule inhibitors of Skp2/Cks1 E3 ligase activity, named Skp2E3LIs, block phosphorylation of pRb, the downstream molecular target for cell cycle arrest in G1 and stabilize nuclear p27 by markedly increasing its half-life [103]. Skp2E3LIs blocked both estrogen stimulation of proliferation and degradation of nuclear p27 to the same extent as blocking estrogen receptor activation with ICI 182,780. In vivo, Skp2E3LIs injected into estrogen-primed mice, obviated estrogen-induced hyperplasia, increased nuclear p27, and decreased the number of mitotic endometrial epithelial cells by 62 % [103]. These studies provide functional proof of principle that Skp2E3LIs act in the nucleus to prevent estrogen-induced degradation of p27 thereby regaining growth control by directly blocking Skp2/Cks1 ubiquitylation. The activity in mice suggests that the Skp2E3LIs might have utility in the treatment of complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia to prevent the development of endometrial carcinoma. Human endometrial cancer xenograft studies in immunocompromised mice using genetically defined patient cells with respect to PTEN, Akt, PI3KCA, Her2 amplification/mutations, are underway with the current Skp2E3LIs. Together with screening for Skp2 levels, these studies should aid in tailoring patient-specific Skp2E3LI therapy while these compounds are clinically developed.
The apparent critical importance and enthusiasm for developing specific inhibitors of Skp2 E3ligase activity to advance the field by supplanting the current non-specific anti-proteasome therapy has been shared by others [104, 105]. In one study, a Skp2 inhibitor discovered through a high throughput in silico screen was shown to suppress human prostate and lung cancer xenograft growth in immunocompromised mice [106]. The Skp2E3LIs are distinguished from other Skp2 inhibitors as they stabilize p27 in the nucleus to prevent cell cycle progression by pharmacologically targeting the binding interaction between the E3 ligase, SCF-Skp2/Cks1, and p27 [106]. As an advantage for endometrial carcinoma prevention and therapy, Skp2E3LIs target the etiologic agent for this cancer by stabilizing p27 in the presence of estrogen. Moreover, Sp2E3LIs subvert the need for progesterone receptors, lacking in higher grade cancers that cannot respond to progestin therapy.
Claudins
Claudins are membrane proteins that are involved in the formation of tight junctions, which block the diffusion of protein and lipids through the plasma membrane [68, 69], and which are associated with epithelial breakdown. They also assist in recruiting cell-signaling proteins, regulate cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and neoplastic transformation [107]. One of the extracellular loops of the claudins acts a binding site for Clostridium perfringens toxin (CPE) [108]. Claudin-3 is a low-affinity receptor for CPE, and claudin-4 is a high-affinity receptor for CPE. Claudin-3 and -4 have been found to be among the highest differentially expressed genes in USC [109], in addition to a variety of other cancers [110, 111]. Claudin-3 and -4 may represent markers for biological aggressiveness; in one study of 20 USC samples, CPE receptors were identified in 100 % of samples and significantly higher levels (p < 0.05) in metastatic USC when compared with primary tumor sites. Thus, USC that are recurrent or refractory to standard treatments may be susceptible to CPE-based therapeutic approaches.
Tubulin
Class III β-tubulin heterodimerizes with α-tubulin to form microtubules critical to cell division. Resistance to paclitaxel has been tied to the upregulation of class III β-tubulin [112], and loss of PTEN appears to confer enhanced tubulin-based metastatic cell reattachment [113]. Paclitaxel binds preferentially to class I β-tubulin [114], and higher class III β-tubulin expression reduces the rate of microtubule assembly, rendering cells less susceptible to paclitaxel [115]. Aggressive histologic subtypes of gynecologic cancer, such as USC, clear cell carcinomas, and other solid tumors, have been associated with high levels of class III β-tubulin [116,117,118].
Epothilones are microtubule-stabilizing macrolides isolated from the bacteria Sorangium cellulosum [119], which exhibit activity against paclitaxel-resistant malignancies due in part to equal binding affinity for class I and class III β-tubulin [120]. Patupilone (Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and ixabepilone (Ixempra®/BMS-247550; Bristol-Meyers-Squibb, NY, USA) are notable members. In vitro, patupilone has shown good efficacy in the inhibition of tumor cell growth in uterine cancer cell lines [117, 121, 122]. Ixabepilone has shown activity at the phase II level for advanced or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinomas [123], but not for uterine leiomyosarcomas previously treated with a taxane [124]. Importantly, class III β-tubulin has not yet been shown to be upregulated in leiomyosarcoma. Ixabepilone remains under evaluation as first-line therapy with carboplatin and bevacizumab in stage III/IV primary or recurrent endometrial cancer.
Future Directions
Recent reports on the genetic landscape of somatic single-nucleotide and copy-number mutations in endometrial cancers have greatly contributed to a deeper understanding of the molecular aberrations underlying these tumors and provided opportunities for genome-guided clinical trials. Novel immunotherapy approaches based on immune checkpoint-antibodies in hypermutated and ultramutated tumors and tumor-specific drug delivery; small molecule inhibitors against PI3K, AKT, or mTOR pathways; anti-angiogenic and novel cytotoxic agents such as the epothilones against MSS and biologically aggressive copy-number high; serous-like endometrial tumors are among the most promising developments for this disease. With growing recognition of the importance of individual tumor biology, in the next few years, we hope that targeted therapies will allow for the genuine practice of personalized molecular medicine in endometrial cancer.
References
Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 1983;15:10–7.
Lax SF, Pizer ES, Ronnett BM, Kurman RJ. Comparison of estrogen and progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and p53 immunoreactivity in uterine endometrioid carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma with squamous, mucinous, secretory, and ciliated cell differentiation. Hum Pathol. 1998;29:924–31.
Voss MA, et al. Should grade 3 endometrioid endometrial carcinoma be considered a type 2 cancer—a clinical and pathological evaluation. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:15–20.
Goff BA, et al. Uterine papillary serous carcinoma: patterns of metastatic spread. Gynecol Oncol. 1994;54:264–8.
Mutch DG. The more things change the more they stay the same. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;124:3–4.
Wilson TO, et al. Evaluation of unfavorable histologic subtypes in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:418–23. discussion 423–6.
Emons G, Fleckenstein G, Hinney B, Huschmand A, Heyl W. Hormonal interactions in endometrial cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2000;7:227–42.
Hameed K, Morgan DA. Papillary adenocarcinoma of endometrium with psammoma bodies. Histology and fine structure. Cancer. 1972;29:1326–35.
Hamilton CA, et al. Uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas predict for poorer survival compared to grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers. Br J Cancer. 2006;94:642–6.
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497:67–73.
Albertson TM, et al. DNA polymerase epsilon and delta proofreading suppress discrete mutator and cancer phenotypes in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:17101–4.
Palles C, et al. Germline mutations affecting the proofreading domains of POLE and POLD1 predispose to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. Nat Genet. 2013;45:713.
Meng B, et al. POLE exonuclease domain mutation predicts long progression-free survival in grade 3 endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:15–9.
Santin AD, et al. Improved survival of patients with hypermutation in uterine serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol Report. 2015;12:3–4.
Boussiotis VA. Somatic Mutations and Immunotherapy Outcome with CTLA-4 Blockade in Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMe1413061.
Loeb LA. Human cancers express mutator phenotypes: origin, consequences and targeting. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:450–7.
Snyder A, et al. Genetic Basis for Clinical Response to CTLA-4 Blockade in Melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1406498.
Martin SA, et al. DNA polymerases as potential therapeutic targets for cancers deficient in the DNA mismatch repair proteins MSH2 or MLH1. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:235–48.
Hewish M, et al. Cytosine-based nucleoside analogs are selectively lethal to DNA mismatch repair-deficient tumour cells by enhancing levels of intracellular oxidative stress. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:983–92.
Risinger JI, Hayes AK, Berchuck A, Barrett JC. PTEN/MMAC1 mutations in endometrial cancers. Cancer Res. 1997;57:4736–8.
Tashiro H, et al. Mutations in PTEN are frequent in endometrial carcinoma but rare in other common gynecological malignancies. Cancer Res. 1997;57:3935–40.
Samarnthai N, Hall K, Yeh I-T. Molecular profiling of endometrial malignancies. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:162363.
Prat J, Gallardo A, Cuatrecasas M, Catasús L. Endometrial carcinoma: pathology and genetics. Pathology. 2007;39:72–87.
Mutter GL, et al. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:924–30.
Vanhaesebroeck B, Guillermet-Guibert J, Graupera M, Bilanges B. The emerging mechanisms of isoform-specific PI3K signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:329–41.
Matias-Guiu X, Prat J. Molecular pathology of endometrial carcinoma. Histopathology. 2013;62:111–23.
Oda K, Stokoe D, Taketani Y, McCormick F. High frequency of coexistent mutations of PIK3CA and PTEN genes in endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2005;65:10669–73.
Doll A, et al. Novel molecular profiles of endometrial cancer—new light through old windows. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;108:221–9.
Pavlidou A, Vlahos NF. Molecular alterations of PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: a therapeutic target in endometrial cancer. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:709736.
English DP, et al. Oncogenic PIK3CA gene mutations and HER2/neu gene amplifications determine the sensitivity of uterine serous carcinoma cell lines to GDC-0980, a selective inhibitor of Class I PI3 kinase and mTOR kinase (TORC1/2). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:465.e1–9.
English DP, et al. HER2/neu gene amplification determines the sensitivity of uterine serous carcinoma cell lines to AZD8055, a novel dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131:753–8.
Chresta CM, et al. AZD8055 is a potent, selective, and orally bioavailable ATP-competitive mammalian target of rapamycin kinase inhibitor with in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity. Cancer Res. 2010;70:288–98.
Lopez S, et al. Taselisib, a selective inhibitor of PIK3CA, is highly effective on PIK3CA-mutated and HER2/neu amplified uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Gynecol Oncol. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.024.
Dancey JE. Therapeutic targets: MTOR and related pathways. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5:1065–73.
Rodon J, Dienstmann R, Serra V, Tabernero J. Development of PI3K inhibitors: lessons learned from early clinical trials. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:143–53.
Janku F, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:777–82.
Llauradó M, et al. Molecular bases of endometrial cancer: new roles for new actors in the diagnosis and the therapy of the disease. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;358:244–55.
Konecny GE, et al. HER2 gene amplification and EGFR expression in a large cohort of surgically staged patients with nonendometrioid (type II) endometrial cancer. Br J Cancer. 2009;100:89–95.
Schwab CL, et al. Afatinib demonstrates remarkable activity against HER2-amplified uterine serous endometrial cancer in vitro and in vivo. Br J Cancer. 2014;111:1750–6.
Schwab CL, et al. Neratinib shows efficacy in the treatment of HER2/neu amplified uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:142–8.
Kallioniemi OP, et al. ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89:5321–5.
Graus-Porta D, Beerli RR, Daly JM, Hynes NE. ErbB-2, the preferred heterodimerization partner of all ErbB receptors, is a mediator of lateral signaling. EMBO J. 1997;16:1647–55.
Buza N, Roque DM, Santin AD. HER2/ neu in endometrial cancer: a promising therapeutic target with diagnostic challenges. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:343–50.
Black JD, English DP, Roque DM, Santin AD. Targeted therapy in uterine serous carcinoma: an aggressive variant of endometrial cancer. Womens Health. 2014;10:45–57.
Piccart-Gebhart MJ, et al. Trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1659–72.
Jewell E, Secord AA, Brotherton T, Berchuck A. Use of trastuzumab in the treatment of metastatic endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1370–3.
Santin AD, Bellone S, Roman JJ, McKenney JK, Pecorelli S. Trastuzumab treatment in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma overexpressing HER2/neu. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102:128–31.
Villella JA, Cohen S, Smith DH, Hibshoosh H, Hershman D. HER-2/neu overexpression in uterine papillary serous cancers and its possible therapeutic implications. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1897–902.
Clinical trials. Evaluation of carboplatin/paclitaxel with and without Trastuzumab (Herceptin) in Uterine serous cancer. http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01367002
Nagumo Y, et al. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab produce changes in morphology and estrogen receptor signaling in ovarian cancer xenografts revealing new treatment strategies. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:4451–61. at <http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/17/13/4451.short>.
Bellone M, et al. In vitro activity of pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab in uterine serous papillary adenocarcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2010;102:134–43. at <http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v102/n1/abs/6605448a.html>.
Mullen P, Cameron DA, Hasmann M, Smyth JF, Langdon SP. Sensitivity to pertuzumab (2C4) in ovarian cancer models: cross-talk with estrogen receptor signaling. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007;6:93–100.
Kim JW, et al. The growth inhibitory effect of lapatinib, a dual inhibitor of EGFR and HER2 tyrosine kinase, in gastric cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2008;272:296–306.
Lewis Phillips GD, et al. Targeting HER2-positive breast cancer with trastuzumab-DM1, an antibody-cytotoxic drug conjugate. Cancer Res. 2008;68:9280–90.
Remillard S, Rebhun LI, Howie GA, Kupchan SM. Antimitotic activity of the potent tumor inhibitor maytansine. Science. 1975;189:1002–5.
Junttila TT, Li G, Parsons K, Phillips GL, Sliwkowski MX. Trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1) retains all the mechanisms of action of trastuzumab and efficiently inhibits growth of lapatinib insensitive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;128:347–56.
Wilken JA, Maihle NJ. Primary trastuzumab resistance: new tricks for an old drug. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1210:53–65.
Boyraz B, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) for HER2-positive breast cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013;29:405–14.
English DP, et al. T-DM1, a novel antibody-drug conjugate, is highly effective against primary HER2 overexpressing uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Med. 2014;3:1256–65.
Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9:669–76.
Kamat AA, et al. Clinical and biological significance of vascular endothelial growth factor in endometrial cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:7487–95.
Hirai M, et al. Expression of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF-A/VEGF-1 and VEGF-C/VEGF-2) in postmenopausal uterine endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2001;80:181–8.
Mazurek A, et al. Evaluation of angiogenesis, p-53 tissue protein expression and serum VEGF in patients with endometrial cancer. Neoplasma. 2004;51:193–7.
Aghajanian C, et al. Phase II trial of bevacizumab in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2259–65.
Alvarez EA, et al. Phase II trial of combination bevacizumab and temsirolimus in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;129:22–7.
Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab or paclitaxel, carboplatin, and temsirolimus or ixabepilone, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in treating patients with stage III, stage IV, or recurrent endometrial cancer—full text view—ClinicalTrials.gov. https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00977574
Coleman RL, et al. Corrigendum to “A phase II evaluation of aflibercept in the treatment of recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study” [Gynecol Oncol 127 (2012) 538–543]. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;130.
Fuchs CS, et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2014;383:31–9.
Powell MA, et al. A phase II trial of brivanib in recurrent or persistent endometrial cancer: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecologic. 2014;135:38–43. at <http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090825814011585>.
Kuhn E, et al. Identification of molecular pathway aberrations in uterine serous carcinoma by genome-wide analyses. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104:1503–13.
Welcker M, Clurman BE. FBW7 ubiquitin ligase: a tumour suppressor at the crossroads of cell division, growth and differentiation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:83–93.
Mao J-H, et al. FBXW7 targets mTOR for degradation and cooperates with PTEN in tumor suppression. Science. 2008;321:1499–502.
Cassia R, et al. Cyclin E gene (CCNE) amplification and hCDC4 mutations in endometrial carcinoma. J Pathol. 2003;201:589–95.
Shih I-M, et al. Somatic mutations of PPP2R1A in ovarian and uterine carcinomas. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:1442–7.
Nagendra DC, Burke 3rd J, Maxwell GL, Risinger JI. PPP2R1A mutations are common in the serous type of endometrial cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2012;51:826–31.
Zhao S, et al. Landscape of somatic single-nucleotide and copy-number mutations in uterine serous carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:2916–21.
Lin CL, Lin JK. Curcumin: a potential cancer chemopreventive agent through suppressing NF-κB signaling. J Cancer Mol. 2008;4:11–6. at <http://mupnet.com/JOCM%204(1)%2011-16.pdf>.
Bloom J, Pagano M. Deregulated degradation of the cdk inhibitor p27 and malignant transformation. Semin Cancer Biol. 2003;13.
Pagano M, et al. Role of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in regulating abundance of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27. Science. 1995;269.
Sherr CJ, Roberts JM. CDK inhibitors: positive and negative regulators of G1-phase progression. Genes Dev. 1999;13.
Lahav-Baratz S. Decreased level of the cell cycle regulator p27 and increased level of its ubiquitin ligase Skp2 in endometrial carcinoma but not in normal secretory or in hyperstimulated endometrium. Mol Hum Reprod. 2004;10.
Miyamoto T, et al. Inverse correlation between Skp2 and p27Kip1 in normal endometrium and endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009. doi:10.1080/09513590903215482.
Oshita T, Shigemasa K, Nagai N, Ohama K. p27, cyclin E, and CDK2 expression in normal and cancerous endometrium. Int J Oncol. 2002. doi:10.3892/ijo.21.4.737.
Lecanda J, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta, estrogen, and progesterone converge on the regulation of p27Kip1 in the normal and malignant endometrium. Cancer Res. 2007;67:1007–18.
Chu IM, Hengst L, Slingerland JM. The Cdk inhibitor p27 in human cancer: prognostic potential and relevance to anticancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8.
Kamata Y, et al. High expression of skp2 correlates with poor prognosis in endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2005;131.
Wander SA, Zhao D, Slingerland JM. p27: a barometer of signaling deregulation and potential predictor of response to targeted therapies. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;17.
Davidovich S, Ben-Izhak O, Shapira M, Futerman B, Hershko DD. Over-expression of Skp2 is associated with resistance to preoperative doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10.
Huang KT, Pavlides SC, Lecanda J, Blank SV, Mittal KR, Gold LI. Estrogen and progesterone regulate p27kip1 levels via the ubiquitin-proteasome system: pathogenic and therapeutic implications for endometrial cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7.
Di Cristofano A, Ellenson LH. Endometrial carcinoma. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis. 2007;445:53–7. at <http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.pathol.2.010506.091905>.
Ellenson LH, Wu T-C. Focus on endometrial and cervical cancer. Cancer Cell. 2004;5.
Shiozawa T, et al. Up-regulation of p27Kip1 by progestins is involved in the growth suppression of the normal and malignant human endometrial glandular cells. Endocrinology. 2001;142:4182–8.
Watanabe J, et al. Significance of p27 as a predicting marker for medroxyprogesterone acetate therapy against endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16 Suppl 1:452–7.
An H-J, et al. Alteration of PTEN expression in endometrial carcinoma is associated with down-regulation of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27. Histopathology. 2002;41:437–45.
Mamillapalli R, et al. PTEN regulates the ubiquitin-dependent degradation of the CDK inhibitor p27(KIP1) through the ubiquitin E3 ligase SCF(SKP2). Curr Biol. 2001;11:263–7.
Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades N, Hideshima T, Richardson PG, Anderson KC. Proteasome inhibitors as therapeutics. Essays Biochem. 2005;41:205–18.
Kitagawa K, Kotake Y, Kitagawa M. Ubiquitin-mediated control of oncogene and tumor suppressor gene products. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1374–81.
Hao B, et al. Structural basis of the Cks1-dependent recognition of p27(Kip1) by the SCF(Skp2) ubiquitin ligase. Mol Cell. 2005;20:9–19.
Cardozo T, Pagano M. Wrenches in the works: drug discovery targeting the SCF ubiquitin ligase and APC/C complexes. BMC Biochem. 2007;8 Suppl 1:S9.
Wu L, et al. Specific small molecule inhibitors of Skp2-mediated p27 degradation. Chem Biol. 2012;19:1515–24.
Denicourt C, Saenz CC, Datnow B, Cui X-S, Dowdy SF. Relocalized p27Kip1 tumor suppressor functions as a cytoplasmic metastatic oncogene in melanoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67:9238–43.
Larrea MD, Wander SA, Slingerland JM. p27 as Jekyll and Hyde: regulation of cell cycle and cell motility. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:3455–61.
Pavlides SC, et al. Inhibitors of SCF-Skp2/Cks1 E3 ligase block estrogen-induced growth stimulation and degradation of nuclear p27kip1: therapeutic potential for endometrial cancer. Endocrinology. 2013;154:4030–45.
Ungermannova D, et al. High-throughput screening AlphaScreen assay for identification of small-molecule inhibitors of ubiquitin E3 ligase SCFSkp2-Cks1. J Biomol Screen. 2013;18:910–20.
Rico-Bautista E, Wolf DA. Skipping cancer: small molecule inhibitors of SKP2-mediated p27 degradation. Chem Biol. 2012;19:1497–8.
Chan C-H, et al. Pharmacological inactivation of Skp2 SCF ubiquitin ligase restricts cancer stem cell traits and cancer progression. Cell. 2013;154:556–68.
Swift JG, Mukherjee TM, Rowland R. Intercellular junctions in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Submicrosc Cytol. 1983;15:799–810.
Morita K, Furuse M, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S. Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:511–6.
Santin AD, et al. Overexpression of claudin-3 and claudin-4 receptors in uterine serous papillary carcinoma: novel targets for a type-specific therapy using Clostridium perfringens enterotoxin (CPE). Cancer. 2007;109:1312–22.
Morin PJ. Claudin proteins in human cancer: promising new targets for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Res. 2005;65:9603–6.
Hewitt KJ, Agarwal R, Morin PJ. The claudin gene family: expression in normal and neoplastic tissues. BMC Cancer. 2006;6:186.
Kavallaris M, et al. Taxol-resistant epithelial ovarian tumors are associated with altered expression of specific beta-tubulin isotypes. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:1282–93.
Vitolo MI, et al. Loss of PTEN induces microtentacles through PI3K-independent activation of cofilin. Oncogene. 2013;32:2200–10.
Magnani M, et al. The betaI/betaIII-tubulin isoforms and their complexes with antimitotic agents. Docking and molecular dynamics studies. FEBS J. 2006;273:3301–10.
Hari M, Yang H, Zeng C, Canizales M, Cabral F. Expression of class III beta-tubulin reduces microtubule assembly and confers resistance to paclitaxel. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2003;56:45–56.
Roque DM, et al. Class III β-tubulin overexpression in ovarian clear cell and serous carcinoma as a maker for poor overall survival after platinum/taxane chemotherapy and sensitivity to patupilone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:62.e1–9.
Roque DM, et al. Tubulin-β-III overexpression by uterine serous carcinomas is a marker for poor overall survival after platinum/taxane chemotherapy and sensitivity to epothilones. Cancer. 2013;119:2582–92.
Ferrandina G, et al. Class III beta-tubulin overexpression is a marker of poor clinical outcome in advanced ovarian cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:2774–9.
Bollag DM, et al. Epothilones, a new class of microtubule-stabilizing agents with a taxol-like mechanism of action. Cancer Res. 1995;55:2325–33.
English DP, Roque DM, Santin AD. Class III b-tubulin overexpression in gynecologic tumors: implications for the choice of microtubule targeted agents? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13:63–74.
Carrara L, et al. Differential in vitro sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma cell lines is linked to tubulin-beta-III expression. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:231–6.
Paik D, et al. Higher sensitivity to patupilone versus paclitaxel chemotherapy in primary uterine serous papillary carcinoma cell lines with high versus low HER-2/neu expression in vitro. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;119:140–5.
Dizon DS, et al. Phase II trial of ixabepilone as second-line treatment in advanced endometrial cancer: gynecologic oncology group trial 129-P. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3104–8.
Duska LR, et al. A phase II evaluation of ixabepilone (IND #59699, NSC #710428) in the treatment of recurrent or persistent leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;135:44–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Black, J.D., Roque, D.M., Gold, L.I., Santin, A.D. (2015). Future Directions and New Targets in Endometrial Cancer. In: Muggia, F., Santin, A.D., Oliva, E. (eds) Uterine Cancer. Current Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/7631_2015_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/7631_2015_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-47267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-47269-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)