Skip to main content

Strategic Implementation

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

If we assume that a firm begins with a well-articulated strategy and clear objectives, to implement that strategy it must be organized in a way that efficiently executes the associated central tasks and activities. The choice of organizational form responsive to any strategic setting consists of a comprehensive design of formal structure, information and decision processes, and human capital-related activities. Formal structure must generally align the firm’s hierarchy with the primary tasks derived from the strategy. As implementation-related activities unfold, information must be collected and shared to coordinate tasks, track performance and adjust activities according to intermediate outcomes. Human capital requirements must be well articulated, with appropriate selection, socialization, development and retention processes carefully planned for employees at all levels. Each of these elements must be responsive to the organization’s strategic intentions, but must also comprise an internally consistent package of design choices which are mutually reinforcing.

This entry was originally published on Palgrave Connect under ISBN 978-1-137-49190-9. The content has not been changed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blau, P.M., and R. Schoenherr. 1971. The structure of organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossidy, L., and R. Charan. 2002. Execution: The discipline of getting things done. New York: Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, T., and G.M. Stalker. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A.D. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. 1972. Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezso, C.L., and D.G. Ross. 2012. Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel investigation. Strategic Management Journal 33: 1072–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., and A.H. Van de Ven. 1985. Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 514–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dundas, K.N.M., and P.R. Richardson. 1982. Implementing the unrelated product strategy. Strategic Management Journal 3: 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R. 1973. Designing complex organizations. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R., and R.K. Kazanjian. 1986. Strategy implementation: The role of structure, systems and process. St Paul: West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govindarajan, V. 1988. A contingent approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal 3: 828–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gresov, C., and R. Drazin. 1997. Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review 22: 403–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A., and V. Govindarajan. 1984. Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics, and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Academy of Management Journal 27: 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D.C., and P.A. Mason. 1984. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrebiniak, L., and W. Joyce. 1984. Implementing strategy. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.S., and D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January–February, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollick, E. 2012. People and process, suits and innovators: The role of individuals in firm performance. Strategic Management Journal 33: 1001–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J.D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tushman, M., W.K. Smith, R. Wood, G. Westerman, and C. O’Reilly. 2010. Organizational design and innovation streams. Industrial and Corporate Change 19: 1331–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. 1965. Industrial organization: Theory and practice. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert K. Kazanjian .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kazanjian, R.K. (2016). Strategic Implementation. In: Augier, M., Teece, D. (eds) The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_740-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_740-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94848-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics