Abstract
This chapter explores the notion of risk as it is managed in the context of the facilitation of learning disabled children’s access to outdoor green space. This context is argued to be particularly fascinating in terms of the governance of risk to children as it draws a spotlight on a particularly “vulnerable” population interacting with a particularly “dangerous” space. The discussion in this chapter focuses on the concept of stigma, a central theme in the disability studies discourse. This chapter suggests that it is through stigmatized institutional and familial practices that learning disabled young people are prevented from engaging with urban green spaces, as a result of both intimidation and overprotection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aitchison, C. (2000). Young disabled people, leisure and everyday life: Reviewing conventional definitions for leisure studies. Annals of Leisure Research, 3, 1–20.
Austen, L. (2009). The social construction of risk by young people. Health, Risk and Society, 11(5), 451–470.
BBC News. (2002). Children’s ‘right to play’ (online). Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/2176467.stm. Accessed 1 Nov 2010.
BBC Wildlife Magazine. (2008). Kids and nature: Have our children lost all connection to wildlife? BBC Wildlife Magazine, Aug 2008, 26, 9.
Benwell, M. C. (2013). Rethinking conceptualisations of adult-imposed restriction and children’s experiences of autonomy in outdoor space. Children’s Geographies, 11(1), 28–43.
Brown, W. H., Odom, S. L., %26 Conroy, M. A. (2001). An intervention hierarchy for promoting young children’s peer interactions in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(3), 162–175.
Burns, R. C., %26 Graefe, A. R. (2007). Constraints to outdoor recreation: Exploring the effects of disabilities on perceptions and participation. Journal of Leisure Research, 39(1), 156–181.
Carver, A., Timperio, A., %26 Crawford, D. (2008). Playing it safe: The influence of neighbourhood safety on children’s physical activity – A review. Health and Place, 14, 217–227.
Christensen, L. L., Fraynt, R. J., Neece, C. L., %26 Baker, B. L. (2012). Bullying adolescents with intellectual disability. Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 5(1), 49–65.
Cooper, G. (2005). Disconnected children. ECOS, 26, 26–31.
Countryside Agency. (2005). Diversity review. Cheltenham: Country74side Agency.
Davis, J. M., %26 Watson, N. (2001). Where are the children’s experiences? Analysing social and cultural exclusion in ‘special’ and ‘mainstream’ schools. Disability and Society, 16(5), 671–687.
Defra. (2011). The natural choice: Securing the value of nature. London: The Stationery Office.
Duzenli, T., Bayramoglu, E., %26 Ozbilen, A. (2010). Needs and preferences of adolescents in open urban spaces. Scientific Research and Essay, 5(2), 201–216.
Evans, J., Evans, B., %26 Rich, E. (2003). ‘The only problem is, children will like their chips’: Education and the discursive production of ill health. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(2), 215–240.
Foucault, M. (1986). Disciplinary power and subjection. New York: New York University Press.
Foucault, M. (1988). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Random House Digital.
Freeman, C. (1995). Planning and play: Creating greener environments. Children’s Environments, 12(3), 381–388.
Furedi, F. (2002). The culture of fear. London: Cassell.
Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkien Foundation.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood: Prentice-Hall.
Hallman, B., %26 Benbow, M. (2007). Family leisure, family photography and zoos: Exploring the emotional geography of families. Social and Cultural Geography, 8(6), 871–886.
Hart, R. (1978). Children’s exploration of tomorrow’s environments. Ekistics, 45, 387–390.
Holloway, S., %26 Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2012). Neoliberalism, policy localisation and idealised subjects: A case study on educational restructuring in England. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(4), 639–654.
Jahonda, A., Wilson, A., %26 Stalker, K. (2010). Living with stigma and the self-perceptions of people with mild intellectual disabilities. Journal of Social Issues, 66(3), 521–534.
Jenks, C. (1996). The postmodern child. In J. Brannen %26 M. O’Brien (Eds.), Children in families: Research and policy (pp. 13–25). London: Routledge.
Johansson, M. (2003). Social dangers as constraints for pro-environmental travel modes, the perception of parents in England and Sweden. Medio Ambiente y Comportamento Humano, 1, 49–69.
Kytta, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 109–123.
Little, J. (2008). Nature, fear and rurality. In R. Pain %26 S. Smith (Eds.), Fear: critical geopolitics and everyday life (pp. 87–98). Guildford: Ashgate.
Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature deficit disorder. Chapel Hill: Algonquin Books.
Malone, K. (2007). The bubble-wrap generation: Children growing up in walled gardens. Environmental Education Research, 13(4), 513–527.
Metzel, D., %26 Walker, P. (2001). The illusion of inclusion: Geographies of the lives of people with developmental disabilities in the United States. Disability Studies Quarterly, 21, 114–128.
Milligan, C., %26 Bingley, A. (2007). Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health and Place, 13, 799–811.
Oxarart, A., Monroe, M., %26 Plate, R. (2013). From play areas to natural areas: The role of zoos in getting families outdoors. Visitor Studies, 16(1), 82–94.
Pain, R. (2006). Paranoid parenting? Rematerializing risk and fear for children. Social and Cultural Geography, 7(2), 221–242.
Parkes, J., %26 Conolly, A. (2011). Risky positions? Shifting representations of urban youth in the talk of professionals and young people. Children’s Geographies, 9(3–4), 411–423.
Parr, H. (2007). Collaborative film making as process, method and text in mental health research. Cultural Geographies, 14(1), 114–138.
Percy-Smith, B., %26 Matthews, H. (2001). Tyrannical spaces: Young people, bullying and the urban neighbourhood. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 6(1), 49–63.
Philo, C. (1995). Journey to asylum: A medical-geographical idea in historical context. Journal of Historical Geography, 21(2), 148–168.
Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.
Solish, A., Perry, A., %26 Minnes, P. (2010). Participation of children with and without disabilities in social, recreational and leisure activities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 23, 226–236.
Talbot, D. (2013). Early parenting and the urban experience: Risk, community, play and embodiment in an East London neighbourhood. Children’s Geographies, 11(2), 230–242.
Valentine, G. (1996). Children should be seen and not heard: The production and transgression of adults’ public space. Human Geography, 17(3), 205–220.
Valentine, G., %26 McKendrick, J. (1997). Children’s outdoor play: Exploring parental concerns about children’s safety and the changing nature of childhood. Geoforum, 28(2), 219–235.
von Benzon, N. (2010). Moving on from ramps? The utility of the social model of disability for facilitating experiences of nature for disabled children. Disability and Society, 25, 617–626.
von Benzon, N. (2011). Who’s afraid of the big bad woods? Fear and learning disabled children’s access to local nature. Local Environment, 16(10), 1021–1040.
von Benzon, N., Makuch, K., %26 Makuch, Z. (2008). The right for disabled children to access the natural environment: A law and policy critique. Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 16, 76–105.
Weiner, J., %26 Sneider, B. (2002). A multisource exploration of the friendship patterns of children with and without learning disability. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(2), 127–141.
Wilson, E. O. (1986). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolpert, J. (1980). The dignity of risk. Transactions. Institute of British Geographers, 5(4), 391–401.
Woolley, H. (2009). Every child matters in public open spaces. In A. Millie (Ed.), Securing respect: Behavioural expectations and anti-social behaviour in the UK (pp. 75–95). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
von Benzon, N. (2015). “Vulnerable” Children in “Dangerous” Places: Learning Disabled Children in Outdoor Green Space. In: Freeman, C., Tranter, P., Skelton, T. (eds) Risk, Protection, Provision and Policy. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-99-6_20-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-99-6_20-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-99-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences