Abstract
Malaysia has been struggling with the officially endorsed system of legal pluralism whereby Islamic and civil law coexist as perceived independent niches of the legal system causing significant legal, political, and social tension. One of the areas where those tensions between the different legal systems are apparent is in the area of human rights and in particular the rights of women. The two legal systems are vying for normative dominance as to what system prevails in cases of conflict. As human rights are enshrined in the constitutional framework of Malaysia, one might assume that the constitution prevails over religious laws. Yet, this is not necessarily the case. All three branches of government – legislature, executive, and judiciary – are not only at odds with each other but also conflicted within. This chapter considers the different communities that shape the discourse on the relationship between Islam, law, and the human rights of women in Malaysia. Civil society organizations have contributed significantly to the debate voicing in particular their concerns that human rights are threatened by the implementation of various Islamic laws, in particular Islamic family law and Islamic criminal law. The focus of this chapter is on how the human rights enshrined in CEDAW fare in the context of Malaysia, a country that is renegotiating its identity between a secular and Islamic state.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abdullah MC (n.d.) Her story – Maria Chin Abdullah. EMPOWER website https://empowermalaysia.org/herstory-maria/
Ahmad I (1985) The position of Islam in the Constitution of Malaysia. In: Ibrahim A, Siddique S, Hussain Y (eds) Readings on Islam in Southeast Asia. ISEAS, Singapore, pp 213–220
Ahmad S (2005) Islam in Malaysia constitutional and human rights perspectives. Muslim World J Hum Rights 2(1)
Alagesh TN (2014) Nation must combat liberalism. New Straits Times, 14 May
Ali SS (2000) Gender and human rights in Islam and International Law: equal before Allah, unequal before man? Kluwer Law International, The Hague
Amnesty International (2010) A blow to humanity: torture by judicial caning in Malaysia
Anbalagan V (2017) Bar welcomes promotion of women judges to Superior Courts. Free Malaysia Today, 25 September. http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/09/25/bar-welcomes-promotion-of-women-judges-to-superior-courts/
An-Na’im AA (1990) Islam, Islamic law and the dilemma of cultural legitimacy for universal human rights. In: Welch CEJ, Leary VA (eds) Asian perspectives on human rights. Westview Press, Boulder, pp 31–54
An-Na’im AA (2001) Toward an Islamic reformation: civil liberties, human rights and international law. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse
Anwar Z (2001a) The struggle for women’s rights within the religious framework: the experience of Sisters in Islam. In: Barlow C (ed) Modern Malaysia in the global economy: political and social change into the 21st century. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 178–188
Anwar Z (2001b) What Islam, whose Islam? Sisters in Islam and the struggle for women’s rights. In: Hefner R (ed) The politics of multiculturalism: pluralism and citizenship in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu, pp 227–252
Asian NGO Network on National Human Rights Institutions (ANNI) (2011) Open letter: the Malaysian parliament must discuss SUHAKAM’s annual reports. Forum-Asia, 30 June. https://www.forum-asia.org/?p=10721
Aun WM (1990) The Malaysian legal system. Longman Malaysia, Petaling Jaya Selangor
Bernama (2007) Malaysia not secular state, says Najib. Bernama, 17 July
Bernama (2017) Ministry open to feedback on caning in schools. Bernama, 28 April. http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2017/04/28/ministry-open-to-feedback-on-caning-in-schools/
Black A, Esmaeili H, Hosen N (2013a) Modern perspectives on Islamic Law: Islamic criminal law. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Black A, Esmaeili H, Hosen N (2013b) Modern perspectives on Islamic law: the nature of law, and its relationship with religion in Islam. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Carvalho M (2015) Govt maintains marital rape not criminal. The Star, 10 June. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/06/10/govt-maintains-marital-rape-not-crime/
Chin J (2004) Exigency or expediency? Contextualising political Islam and the PAS challenge in Malaysian Politics. Third World Q 25:359–372
COMANGO (2016) Malaysia’s 2016 UPR mid-term review: ensuring society’s participation – a critical engagement towards fulfilling Malaysia’s UPR obligations. Coalition of Malaysian NGOs in the UPR Process (COMANGO)
David A (2017) First female judge of Terengganu Syariah Court of Appeal vows to tackle high number of divorces. New Straits Times, 16 October. https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-courts/2017/10/291762/first-female-judge-terengganu-syariah-court-appeal-vows-tackle-high
Department of Education (2003) Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 7/2003 Kuasa Guru Merotan Murid [Professional circular 7/2003 authority to carry out corporal punishment in schools]. Government of Malaysia. https://www.moe.gov.my/images/pekeliling/2008/circularfile_file_000134.pdf
Elias J (2015) Realising women’s human rights in Malaysia: the EMPOWER report. Asian Stud Rev 39:229–246
Faruqi SS (2005) The Malaysian Constitution, the Islamic State and hudud laws. In: Nathan KS, Kamali MH (eds) Islam in Southeast Asia: political, social and strategic challenges for the 21st century. ISEAS, Singapore, pp 256–276
Government of Malaysia (2004) Combined initial and second periodic report of state parties: Malaysia. CEDAW/C/MYS/1-2, 2004
Government of Malaysia (2010) 2010 census. Department of Statistics. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php
Government of Malaysia (2016) Combined third to fifth periodic reports of states parties due in 2012: Malaysia. CEDAW/C/MYS/3-5
Hamzah M, Othman N (2010) Stress, quarrels and neglect: the ‘normal’ polygamous family. Open Democracy, 14 January. https://www.opendemocracy.net/5050/masjaliza-hamzah-norami-othman/stress-quarrels-and-neglect-normal-polygamous-family
Hooker MB (1978) A concise legal history of South-East Asia. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Human Rights in ASEAN (2016) Debate Suhakam’s annual report in Parliament, says Gerakan, 27 April. https://humanrightsinasean.info/article/debate-suhakams-annual-report-parliament-says-gerakan.html
Human Rights Watch (2017a) Submission by Human Rights Watch to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women, 69th Pre-Sessional Working Group
Human Rights Watch (2017b) World report 2017: Malaysia – events of 2016
JAG (2017) Changes to domestic violence law good: now step-up enforcement. Joint Action Group for Gender Equality, press statement, 4 April
Joint NGO Submission (2017) Critical issues and questions to be raised with the Malaysian government at the 69th CEDAW Pre-Sessional Working Group
Kamali MH (2000) Islamic law in Malaysia – issues and developments. Ilmiah Publishers, Kuala Lumpur
Khoo A (2016) Speech by Andrew Khoo, co-chairperson of the Bar Council Human Rights Committee, at the joint commemoration of the 2016 Human Rights Day (8 December 2016), 15 December
Kine P (2017) Indonesia’s Aceh authorities lash hundreds under Sharia statutes: repeal of discriminatory, brutal bylaws long overdue. Human Rights Watch, 8 February
Lim Kit Siang (2012) DAP stand that Malaysia is secular state with Islam as official religion is no different from that of first three prime ministers – Tunku Abdul Rahman, Tun Razak and Tun Hussein. 9 August. https://blog.limkitsiang.com/2012/08/09/dap-stand-that-malaysia-is-secular-state-with-islam-as-official-religion-is-no-different-from-that-of-first-three-prime-ministers-tunku-abdul-rahman-tun-razak-and-tun-hussein/
Lindsey T, Steiner K (2012) Islam, law and the state in Southeast Asia: Malaysia and Brunei, vol 3. IB Tauris, London
Liu J (2014) Civil liberties in contemporary Malaysia: progress, retrogression and the resurgence of ‘Asian values.’ In: Weiss ML (ed) Routledge handbook of contemporary Malaysia. Routledge, Oxon, pp 290–301
Mahathir M (2002) Malaysia is a ‘fundamentalist state.’ CNN.com, 18 June. http://edition.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/asiapcf/southeast/06/18/malaysia.mahathir/
Malay Mail (2016) Shariah High Court appoints first women judges in Malaysia. Malay Mail, 27 June. http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/the-first-two-women-shariah-high-court-judges-in-malaysia
Malay Mail (2017) 8,000 polygamy applications given green light since 2010, Putrajaya Reveals. Malay Mail, 20 March. http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/over-8000-polygamy-applications-given-green-light-since-2010-putrajaya-reve
Malaysiakini (2016) After complaints, Education DG posts caning guidelines. Malaysiakini, 12 May. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/341326
Mauzy DK, Milne RS (1983/1984) The Mahathir administration in Malaysia: discipline through Islam. Pac Aff 56(4):617–648
Mayer AE (2013) Islam and human rights tradition and politics, 5th edn. Westview Press, Boulder
Mayuri ML (2016) Women’s groups want all female judges allowed into Shariah system. Malay Mail, 20 February. http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/womens-groups-want-all-female-judges-allowed-into-shariah-system
Ministry of Women, Family and Development (2012) Statistics on women, family and society. Government of Malaysia
Moussalli AS (2001) The Islamic quest for democracy, pluralism and human rights. University Press of Florida, Gainesville
Neo JL-C (2003) Anti-God, anti-Islam and anti-Quran: expanding the range of participants and parameters in discourse over women’s rights and Islam in Malaysia. UCLA Pac Basin Law J 21:29–74
Neo JL-C (2013) Violence, exploitation, and abuse and discrimination in migration affecting women and children in ASEAN: a baseline study: Malaysia. Human Rights Resource Centre, University of Indonesia
NGO Shadow Report (2005) NGO shadow report on the initial and second periodic report of the government of Malaysia: reviewing the government’s implementation of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)
Noor FA (2004) Islam embedded – the historical development of the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party PAS (1951–2003), vol 1. Malaysian Sociological Research Institute, Kuala Lumpur
O’Toole S (2016) Six countries to watch in 2016. Freedom as Issue Blog [Freedom House], 3 February. https://freedomhouse.org/blog/six-countries-watch-2016
Rahim LZ (2013) Introduction: the spirit of wasatiyyah democracy. In: Rahim LZ (ed) Muslim secular democracy: voices from within. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–30
Razak A (2012) PM: no need for women’s rights movement in M’sia. Malaysiakini, 2 October. https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/210484
Safi O (ed) (2003) Progressive Muslims: on justice, gender and pluralism. Oneworld, Oxford
Shankar DM (2010) Common sense and the law. The Star, 21 November. https://www.thestar.com.my/opinion/letters/2010/11/21/common-sense-and-the-law/
Sharma A (ed) (1987) Women in world religions. State University of New York Press, Albany
Sisters in Islam (1996) Memorandum on reform of the Islamic family laws on polygamy
Sisters in Islam (2009) Women as judges
Sisters in Islam (2015) Poligami! Mitos dan Realiti di Malaysia. YouTube, Oct. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kTbg3d9OSYo
Sisters in Islam (2017) SIS vs Jawatankuasa Fatwa Selangor, MAIS and government of Selangor, 11 July
Sisters in Islam (n.d.) Introduction of polygamy. Sisters in Islam website. http://www.sistersinislam.org.my/news.php?cat.7
Star (2006) SIS: Most problems in Islamic family law clarified. The Star, 19 March. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2006/03/19/sis-most-problems-in-islamic-family-law-clarified/
Star (2017) Zahid: public caning in Kelantan only applicable to Muslims. The Star, 13 July. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2017/07/13/zahid-hamidi-public-caning-kelantan/
Stark J (2004) Constructing an Islamic model in two Malaysian states: PAS rule in Kelantan and Terengganu sojourn. J Soc Issues SE Asia 19:51–75
Steiner K (2013) The case continues? The high courts in Malaysia and unilateral conversion of a child to Islam by one parent. Aust J Asian Law 14:1–15
Suhakam (2014) A report to the committee on the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW) in Malaysia. Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
Suhakam (2016) Annual report. Human rights Commission of Malaysia
Suhakam (2017) An independent report to the committee on the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW). Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
Tan K (2001) Suhakam is not pro-government or NGO. Malaysiakini, 4 May. https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/2678
Thio L-a (2009) Panacea, placebo, or pawn? The teething problems of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam). George Wash Int Law Rev 40:1271–1342
Timbuong J (2018) Woman to be caned for prostitution. The Star, 28 September
UNCEDAW (1989) General recommendations adopted by the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women: general recommendation no. 12: violence against women, 12th session. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
UNCEDAW (2006a) Concluding comments of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Malaysia, 31 May. CEDAW/C/MYS/CO/2. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
UNCEDAW (2006b) List of issues and questions with regard to the consideration of an initial and periodic report: Malaysia. CEDAW/C/MYS/Q/2. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
UNCEDAW (2006c) Summary record of the 732nd meeting. CEDAW/C/SR.732. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
UNCEDAW (2017) List of issues and questions in relation to the combined third to fifth periodic reports of Malaysia. CEDAW/C/MYS/Q/3-5. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
WAO (2012) CEDAW and Malaysia: Malaysian non-government organisations’ alternative report. Made by Women’s Aid Organisation on behalf of the Malaysian NGO CEDAW Alternative Report Group
Whiting A (2003) Situating Suhakam: human rights debates and Malaysia’s National Human Rights Commission. Stanf J Int Law 39:59–98
Zin NM (2012) The training, appointment, and supervision of Islamic judges in Malaysia. Pac Rim Law Policy J 21(1):115–131
Zin NM (2017) Female judges in Malaysian Shari’a courts: a problem of gender or legal interpretation? In: Sonneveld N, Lindbekk M (eds) Women judges in the Muslim world: a comparative study of discourse and practice. Brill, Leiden, pp 153–177
Cases
Aishah Abdul Rauf v Wan Mohd Yusof Wan Othman (1990) Malayan Law Journal Reports 3:60
Che Omar bin Che Soh v Public Prosecutor (1988) Malayan Law Journal Reports 2:55
Indira Gandhi a/p Mutho v Pengarah Jabatan Agama Islam [2013] 5 MLJ 552
Noorfadilla binti Ahmad Saikin v Chayed bin Basirun et al. [2012] 1 MLJ 832
UNCEDAW (1989) General recommendations adopted by the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women: general recommendation no. 12: violence against women, 12th session. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
UNCEDAW (1992) General recommendations adopted by the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women: general recommendation no. 19: violence against women, 11th session. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
UNCEDAW (1994) General recommendations adopted by the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women: general recommendation no. 21: equality in marriage and family relations, 13th session. Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Steiner, K. (2019). Islam, Law, and Human Rights of Women in Malaysia. In: Reilly, N. (eds) International Human Rights of Women. International Human Rights. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4550-9_27-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4550-9_27-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-4550-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-4550-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Law and CriminologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences