Abstract
The term “bullionism” describes a belief that the price of gold, measured in domestic currency, is an appropriate indicator of inflation and the depreciation of the currency caused by an excess supply of money. The term bullionism arose from what has come to be known as the Bullionist Controversy in the United Kingdom. In 1797, while at war with France and in the midst of declining reserves at the Bank of England, Britain suspended the convertibility of Bank of England notes into gold. The British also pressured Ireland to suspend the convertibility of Bank of Ireland notes. Following the suspension of convertibility, both countries experienced a rising price of gold and a depreciation of their exchange rate. Since price indexes were not available at that time, the debate was about the cause of the rising price of gold and depreciation of the exchange rate. The Bullionists argued that the rising price of gold was an indicative of rising prices in general and that the rising prices and depreciation of the exchange rate were due to an excess supply of bank notes. The Antibullionists denied that an excess supply of bank notes was to blame for depreciation and instead argued that the cause was a combination of foreign remittances, bad harvests, and an adverse balance of trade. A similar debate took place in Sweden over a half of a century earlier when elected officials used what is now known as the Sveriges Riksbank to finance an expansion of commercial activity with new bank notes. These debates carry important lessons about the determination of the price level and the exchange rate under the gold standard and under a paper money standard. The empirical literature on these periods is somewhat limited. In this paper, I summarize the existing literature and point to areas for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antipa PM (2017) How fiscal policy affects prices: Britain’s first experience with paper money. J Econ Hist 76(4):1044–1076
Angell JW (1926) The theory of international prices. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Christiernin PN (1761) Utdrag af Föreläsmingar angaende den i Svea Rike upstigne Wexel- Coursen (summary of lectures on the high price of foreign exchange in Sweden). Tryckt hos Directör Lars Salvius, Stockholm
Eagly RV (1963) Money, employment and prices: a Swedish view, 1761. Q J Econ 77(4):626–636
Eagly RV (1969) Monetary policy and politics in mid-eighteenth century Sweden. J Econ Hist 29(4):739–757
Edvinsson R, Ögren A (2014) Swedish money supply. In: Edvinsson R, Jacobson T, Waldenström D (eds) House prices, stock returns, national accounts, and the Riksbank balance sheet. Ekerlids Förlag, Stockholm, pp 1620–2012
Fetter FW (1955) The Irish pound, 1797–1826. A reprint of the report of the committee of 1804 of the British house of commons on the condition of the Irish currency. George Allen and Unwin Ltd, London
Foster JL (1804) An essay on the principles of commercial exchanges. J. Hatchard, London
Galton ST (1813) A chart, exhibiting the relation between the amount of Bank of England notes in circulation, the rate of foreign exchanges, and the price of gold and silver bullion and of wheat. J. Johnson & Co., London
Gayer AD, Rostow WW, Schwartz AJ (1953) The growth and fluctuation of the British economy, 1790–1850. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Glasner D (1985) A reinterpretation of classical monetary theory. South Econ J 52(1):46–67
Hendrickson JR (2018) The Bullionist controversy: theory and new evidence. J Money Credit Bank 50(1):203–241
Herger, Nils (2017) An empirical assessment of the Swedish bullionist controversy (working paper)
Jonung L (1976) Money and prices in Sweden 1732–1972. Scand J Econ 78(1):40–58
King (Lord) (1803) Thoughts on the effects of the Bank restrictions. Cadell and Davies, London
Laidler, David (2000) Highlights of the bullionist controversy (working papers 2000–2002), Department of Economics University of Western Ontario
Myhrman J (1976) Experiences of flexible exchange rates in earlier periods: theories, evidence, and a new view. Scand J Econ 78(2):169–196
Nachane DM, Hatekar NR (1995) The bullionist controversy: an empirical reappraisal. Manch Sch 63(4):412–425
Gráda CÓ (1991) Reassessing the Irish pound report of 1804. Bull Econ Res 43(1):5–19
Gráda CÓ (1993) The Irish paper pound of 1797 –1820: some cliometrics of the bullionist debate. Oxf Econ Pap 45(1):148–156
Officer LH (2000) The bullionist controversy: a time series analysis. Int J Financ Econ 5:197–209
Parnell H (1804) Observations upon the state of currency in Ireland, and upon the course of exchange between Dublin and London. Mahon, Dublin
Ricardo D (1810-11) The high price of bullion. In: Sraffa P (ed) Works and correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Silberling NJ (1923) British prices and business cycles, 1779–1850. Rev Econ Stat 5(Suppl 2):223–247
Silberling NJ (1924a) Financial and monetary policy of great Britain during the Napoleonic wars. Q J Econ 38(2):214–233
Silberling NJ (1924b) Financial and monetary policy of great Britain during the Napoleonic wars. Q J Econ 38(3):397–439
Thornton H (1802 [1807]) An enquiry into the nature and effects of the paper credit of great Britain. James Humphreys, Philadelphia
Viner J (1937) Studies in the theory of international trade. Harper & Brothers, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Hendrickson, J.R. (2018). Bullionism. In: Battilossi, S., Cassis, Y., Yago, K. (eds) Handbook of the History of Money and Currency. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0622-7_22-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0622-7_22-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0622-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0622-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences