Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dimensionen der Handlungssteuerung und Anstrengungsbereitschaft

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Psychologische Begutachtung

Zusammenfassung

Die Fähigkeit zur Steuerung eigener Handlungen ist ein wichtiges Thema rechtspsychologischer Theorien und Untersuchungsansätze. Eine Beeinträchtigung dieser Fähigkeit kann sowohl durch exogene, situationale Einflüsse als auch durch pathophysiologische Veränderungen der neurokognitiven Kontrollfunktionen und des dopaminergen Anreizsystems verursacht werden. Ein fundiertes Verständnis der wechselseitigen Einflüsse der beteiligten Hirnsysteme auf der psychologischen und neurophysiologischen Ebene bildet eine wesentliche Grundlage für (rechts-)psychologische Bewertungen der Handlungssteuerung. Im Beitrag werden grundlegende neuropsychologische Theorien der kognitiven Kontrolle und Regulation anhand ausgewählter und mehrfach replizierter Studienergebnisse dargestellt. Wesentliche zu berücksichtigende Zustands- und Dispositionsvariablen werden identifiziert. Die kritische Reflexion neuropsychologischer Theorien und der daraus abgeleiteten Operationalisierungen soll die Entwicklung neuer Untersuchungsmethoden sowie die Interpretation von Ergebnissen im rechtspsychologischen Kontext anregen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7(4), 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M. M., & Rosen, Z. B. (2009). Anticipation of cognitive demand during decision-making. Psychological Research, 73(6), 835–842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braver, T. S., Kizhner, A., Tang, R., Freund, M. C., & Etzel, J. A. (2021). The Dual Mechanisms of Cognitive Control (DMCC) Project. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 33(9), 1990–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J. W., & Self, E. A. (1989). The intensity of motivation. Annual review of psychology, 40(1), 109–131.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cancela, T., & Silvestrini, N. (2021). Impact of pain on mental effort assessed as cardiovascular reactivity. PAIN Reports. https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000000917. Zugegriffen am 01.03.2023.

  • Chiew, K. S., Stanek, J. K., & Adcock, R. A. (2016). Reward anticipation dynamics during cognitive control and episodic encoding: Implications for dopamine. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cools, R. (2008). Role of dopamine in the motivational and cognitive control of behavior. The Neuroscientist, 14(4), 381–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, D., Eder, A. B., Steinhauser, M., & Kiesel, A. (2020). Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis – An integrative review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27(2), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenbusch, R., Henningsen, P., & Merten, T. (2011). Die Beurteilung von Aggravation und Dissimulation in der Begutachtung psychischer und psychosomatischer Störungen. Versicherungsmedizin, 63, 81–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler, R., & Steinhausen, H. (2013). Verhaltensinventar zur Beurteilung exekutiver Funktionen BRIEF. Deutschsprachige Adaption des Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Verlag Hans Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343–353.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edel, M.-A., Pfütze, E.-M., Lieder, A., Assion, H.-J., Ribbert, H., Juckel, G., et al. (2009). Self concept, action control and ADHD symptoms under methylphenidate treatment in adults with ADHD. Pharmacopsychiatry, 42(3), 109–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etzel, J. A., Cole, M. W., Zacks, J. M., Kay, K. N., & Braver, T. S. (2016). Reward motivation enhances task coding in frontoparietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 26(4), 1647–1659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finucane, A. M. (2011). The effect of fear and anger on selective attention. Emotion, 11(4), 970–974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2020). How sequentially changing reward prospect modulates meta-control: Increasing reward prospect promotes cognitive flexibility. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 21, 534–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García Alanis, J. C., Baker, T. E., Peper, M., & Chavanon, M.-L. (2019). Social context effects on error-related brain activity are dependent on interpersonal and achievement-related traits. Scientific Report, 9, 1728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H. (2000). On the impact of mood on behavior: An integrative theory and a review. Review of General Psychology, 4(4), 378–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendolla, G. H., & Richter, M. (2006). Cardiovascular reactivity during performance under social observation: The moderating role of task difficulty. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62(1), 185–192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2014). Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: The role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 62, 403–423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000) The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., Gable, P. A., & Price, T. F. (2013). Does negative affect always narrow and positive affect always broaden the mind? Considering the influence of motivational intensity on cognitive scope. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(4), 301–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, T. M., & Ennis, G. E. (2014). Assessment of adult age differences in task engagement: The utility of systolic blood pressure. Motivation and Emotion, 38(6), 844–854.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Heubrock, D., Scholl, H., & Peterman, F. (2013). Die differentielle Validität neuropsycholgischer Testverfahren zum Nachweis nicht-authentischer Störungen. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 24(4), 229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2016). Between persistence and flexibility: The yin and yan of action control. In A. J. Elliot (Hrsg.), Advances in motivation Science (S. 33–67). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, T., & Werheid, K. (2014). Demenzen. Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, T., & Gauggel, S. (Hrsg.). (2008). Neuropsychologie der Schizophrenie: Symptome, Kognition, Gehirn. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplow, B., & Ringendahl, H. (2022). Neuropsychologie des idiopathischen Parkinson-Syndroms. Hogrefe Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lidzba, K., Everts, R., & Reuner, G. (2019). Neuropsychologie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Hogrefe Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). Positive affect and cognitive control: Approach-motivation intensity influences the balance between cognitive flexibility and stability. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1116–1123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mallat, C., Cegarra, J., Calmettes, C., & Capa, R. L. (2020). A curvilinear effect of mental workload on mental effort and behavioral adaptability: An approach with the pre-ejection period. Human Factors, 62(6), 928–939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merten, T. (2020). Beschwerdenvalidierung in der psychologischen und medizinischen Begutachtung. Praxis der Rechtspsychologie, 30(2), 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S. V., & Münte, F. (2009). Störungen der Exekutivfunktionen. In W. Sturm, M. Herrmann, & T. M. Münte (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologe: Grundlagen, Methoden, Diagnostik, Therapie (S. 480–500). Spektrum Akademischer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parro, C., Dixon, M. L., & Christoff, K. (2018). The neural basis of motivational influences on cognitive control. Human Brain Mapping, 39(12), 5097–5111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Peper, M. (2022). Dysexekutive Störungen. In S. Letzel, S. Schmitz-Spanke, J. Lang, & D. Nowak (Hrsg.), Klinische Symptome in der Arbeitsmedizin. Landsberg am Lech: ecomed Medizin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peper, M., & Chavanon, M. L. (2011). The neuropsychology of punishment. In H. Kury & E. Shea (Hrsg.), Punitiveness: International developments (3. Aufl., S. 231–290). Brockmeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peper, M., & Schott, J. (2021). Neuropsychologische Störungen bei coronavirusassoziierten Erkrankungen. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie, 32(4), 195–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, L. (2013). The cognitive-emotional brain: From interactions to integration. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. A., Beech, A. R., Mitchell, I. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). The promises and perils of the emotional Stroop task: A general review and considerations for use with forensic samples. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18, 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M., Gendolla, G., & Wright, R. (2016). Three decades of research on motivational intensity theory: What we have learned about effort and what we still don’t know. In A. J. Elliot (Hrsg.), Advances in motivation science. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, D., Yu, A., Alia-Klein, N., Becker, S., Cromwell, H., Dolcos, F., et al. (2022, preprint). The human affectome. https://hal.science/hal-03728066. Zugegriffen am 11.12.2022.

  • Schulz, W. (2009). Chapter 21 – Midbrain dopamine neurons: A retina of the reward system? In P. Glimcher, C. F. Camerer, E. Fehr, & R. A. Poldrack (Hrsg.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (S. 323–329). Academic Press/Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shackman, A. J., Salomons, T. V., Slagter, H. A., Fox, A. S., Winter, J. J., & Davidson, R. J. (2011). The integration of negative affect, pain and cognitive control in the cingulate cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(3), 154–167.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhav, A., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2016). Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control. Nature Neuroscience, 19(10), 1286–1291.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestrini, N., & Gendolla, G. H. (2019). Affect and cognitive control: Insights from research on effort mobilization. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 143, 116–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, R. (2003). Neural correlates of cognitive control and conflict detection in the Stroop and digit-location tasks. Neuropsychologia, 41(8), 1122–1135.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, A., Kester, D., & Braver, T. S. (2013). What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference. PloS one, 8(7), e68210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A., Mlynski, C., & Carbajal, I. (2019). Outsiders’ thoughts on generating self-regulatory-depletion (fatigue) effects in limited-resource experiments. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 469–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Psychologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland

    Juliana Kolano & Martin Peper

Authors
  1. Juliana Kolano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Peper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana Kolano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Insitut für Psychologie, Universität Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland

    Ralf Dohrenbusch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Kolano, J., Peper, M. (2023). Dimensionen der Handlungssteuerung und Anstrengungsbereitschaft. In: Dohrenbusch, R. (eds) Psychologische Begutachtung. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64801-8_123-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64801-8_123-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-64801-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-64801-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation