Zusammenfassung
Computerunterstütztes kollaboratives Lernen, bei dem zwei oder mehr Lernende beim gemeinsamen Lernen durch Computer unterstützt werden, wird in nahezu allen Bildungsbereichen genutzt. Das folgende Kapitel behandelt, welche theoretischen Grundlagen es zum kollaborativen Lernen gibt, welche Herausforderungen beim kollaborativen Lernen durch Computerunterstützung überwunden werden können und welche Entwicklungen und Trends hierzu aktuell erforscht werden. Abschließend werden Tipps für den Einsatz computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernens in der Lehrpraxis gegeben.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2009). Argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: Indications from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialog. Cognitive Science, 33(3), 374–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01017.x.
Bereiter, C., Cress, U., Fischer, F., Hakkarainen, K., Scardamalia, M., & Vogel, F. (2017). Scripted and unscripted aspects of creative work with knowledge. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier & K. Y. Linn (Hrsg.), Making a difference: Prioritizing equity and access in CSCL, 12th international conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2017 (Bd. 1, S. 751–759). Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Bodzin, A. M., & Park, J. C. (2000). Dialogue patterns of preservice science teachers using asynchronous computer-mediated communications on the World Wide Web. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(2), 161–194.
Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (2006). Affective and motivational outcomes of working in collaborative groups. Educational Psychology, 26(2), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410500344217.
Bossche, P. van den, Gijselaers, W., Segers, M., Woltjer, G., & Kirschner, P. (2011). Team learning: Building shared mental models. Instructional Science, 39(3), 283–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9128-3
Chi, M. T. H. (2009). Active–constructive–interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823.
Clark, H., & Brennan, S. (1991). Grounding in Communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Hrsg.), Perspectives on socially-shared cognition. Washington, DC: APA.
Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600560944.
Cress, U. (2008). The need for considering multilevel analysis in CSCL research – An appeal for the use of more advanced statistical methods. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9032-2.
Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Hrsg.), Three worlds of CSCL. Can we support CSCL (S. 61–91). Heerlen: Open University Nederland.
Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9033-1.
Diziol, D., Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2010). Using intelligent tutor technology to implement adaptive support for student collaboration. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9116-9.
Eberle, J., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2014). Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice – participation support structures for newcomers in faculty student councils. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23, 216–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.883978.
Erkens, M., Bodemer, D., & Hoppe, U. (2016). Improving collaborative learning in the classroom: Text mining based grouping and representing. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11, 387–415. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9243-5.
Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(3), 405–441. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1403_3.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., & Wecker, C. (2013). Toward a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005.
Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1995). Concept maps as hypermedia components. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43(3), 323–361. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1049.
Gielen, M., & De Wever, B. (2015). Structuring peer assessment: Comparing the impact of the degree of structure on peer feedback content. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.019.
Goggins, S. P., Galyen, K. D., Petakovic, E., & Laffey, J. M. (2016). Connecting performance to social structure and pedagogy as a pathway to scaling learning analytics in MOOCs: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 244–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12129.
Hadwin, A. F., Oshige, M., Gress, C. L. Z., & Winne, P. H. (2010). Innovative ways for using gStudy to orchestrate and research social aspects of self-regulated learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 794–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.007.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368.
Janssen, J., & Bodemer, D. (2013). Coordinated computer-supported collaborative learning: Awareness and awareness tools. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.749153.
Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748006.
Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P. A., Panadero, E.,Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., & Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), 125–142.
Järvelä, S., Bonk, C. J., Lehtinen, E., & Lehti, S. (1999). A theoretical analysis of social interactions in computer-based learning environments: Evidence for reciprocal understandings. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.2190/1JB6-FC8W-YEFW-NT9D.
Jeong, H., & Chi, M. T. H. (2007). Knowledge convergence and collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 35(4), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-006-9008-z.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057.
Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2015). Teacher competencies for the implementation of collaborative learning in the classroom: A framework and research review. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 505–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9288-9.
Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., Oeberst, A., & Cress, U. (2015). Learning and Collective Knowledge Construction With Social Media: A Process-Oriented Perspective. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 120–137. http://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036273.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
Klieger, A. (2016). The use of social networks to employ the wisdom of crowds for teaching. TechTrends, 60, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0020-0.
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts – A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2.
Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1993). Using technology to assist in realizing effective learning and instruction: A principled approach to the use of computers in collaborative learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 227–264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_2.
Lai, C.-Y. (2016). Training nursing students’ communication skill with online video peer assessment. Computers & Education, 97(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.017.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lipponen, L. (2000). Towards knowledge building: From facts to explanations in primary students’ computer mediated discourse. Learning Environments Research, 3(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026516728338.
Martinez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Gomez-Sanchez, E., Rubia-Avi, B., Jorrin-Abellan, I., & Marcos, J. A. (2006). Studying participation networks in collaboration using mixed methods. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1(3), 383–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-8705-6.
McManus, M. M., & Aiken, R. M. (1995). Monitoring computer-based colaborative problem solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 6(4), 307–337.
Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9005-x.
Molenaar, I., Roda, C., van Boxtel, C., & Sleegers, P. (2012). Dynamic scaffolding of socially regulated learning in a computer-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 59(2), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.006.
Mugny, G., & Doise, W. (1978). Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances. European Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420080204.
Nistor, N. (2016). Newcomer integration in knowledge communities: Development of the strat-I-Com questionnaire for MMORPG-based communities. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0027-1.
Noroozi, O., Teasley, S. D., Biemans, H. J. A., Weinberger, A., & Mulder, M. (2013). Facilitating learning in multidisciplinary groups with transactive CSCL scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(2), 189–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9162-z.
OECD. (2017). Programme for international student assessment. Zugegriffen am 28.05.2017 unter http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
Oliveira, A. W., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). Interactive patterns and convergence of meaning during student collaborations in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 634–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20211.
Pearsall, M. J., & Venkataramani, V. (2015). Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: The interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038315.
Piaget, J. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York: Basic Books.
Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Decuyper, S., Van den Bossche, P., & Dochy, F. (2015). An exploratory study of group development and team learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21201.
Rayyan, S., Fredericks, C., Colvin, K. F., Liu, A., Teodorescu, R., Barrantes, A., Pritchard, D. E. et al. (2016). A MOOC based on blended pedagogy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12126.
Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., Tempelaar, D., Lygo-Baker, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012). The role of scaffolding and motivation in CSCL. Computers & Education, 59(3), 893–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.010.
Rohlfs, C. (2011). Autonomie, Kompetenz und soziale Eingebundenheit. Die Selbstbestimmungstheorie der Motivation von Deci und Ryan. In Bildungseinstellungen (S. 93–102). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92811-1_6.
Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(3), 235–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0203_1.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Hrsg.), Computer supported collaborative learning (S. 69–97). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5.
Rosé, C. P., Wang, Y. C., Arguello, J., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2008). Analyzing collaborative learning processes automatically: Exploiting the advances of computational linguistics in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 237–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9034-0.
Rosen, Y., & Foltz, P. W. (2014). Assessing Collaborative Problem Solving Through Automated Technologies. Journal of Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(3), 389–410.
Rummel, N., Spada, H., & Hauser, S. (2009). Learning to collaborate while being scripted or by observing a model. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 4(1), 69–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9054-4.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: Influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9068-6.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265–283. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_3.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (S. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schoor, C., Narciss, S., & Koerndle, H. (2015). Regulation during cooperative and collaborative learning: A theory-based review of terms and concepts. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1038540.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2.
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wadsworth, B. J. (2004). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development. Boston: Pearson Education.
Webb, N. M., & Mastergeorge, A. (2003). Promoting effective helping behavior in peer-directed groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(1–2), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00074-0.
Webb, N. M., Troper, J. D., & Fall, R. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(3), 406–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.3.406.
Wegerif, R. (2008). Dialogic or dialectic? The significance of ontological assumptions in research on educational dialogue. British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701532228.
Weinberger, A., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2003). Collaborative knowledge construction in computer-mediated communication: Effects of cooperation scripts on acquisition of application-oriented knowledge. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 211(2), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24319-4_2.
Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Zhao, K., & Chan, C. K. K. (2014). Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9188-x.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.81.3.329.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Vogel, F., Fischer, F. (2018). Computerunterstütztes kollaboratives Lernen. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_3-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_3-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie