Zusammenfassung
Computer-unterstütztes kooperatives Lernen (CSCL) bedeutet, dass mehrere Lernende gemeinsam Lernaufgaben bearbeiten und dabei von Computern unterstützt werden. Basierend auf Merkmalen von Lernaufgaben sowie verschiedenen technischen Unterstützungsmöglichkeiten wird hier ein Modell von CSCL-Szenarien vorgestellt. Das Modell ermöglicht es Wirkzusammenhänge von Unterstützungsmaßnahmen für CSCL-Szenarien einschätzen und überdauernde Gestaltungsmerkmale für CSCL-Szenarien entwickeln zu können.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Abrahamson, D. (2017). Embodiment and mathematics learning. In K. Peppler (Hrsg.), The SAGE encyclopedia of out-of-school learning (S. 247–252). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Aronson, E., Blaney, N., Stepan, C., Sikes, J., & Snapp, N. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverley Hills: Sage.
August, S. E., Hammers, M. L., Murphy, D. B., Neyer, A., Gueye, P., & Thames, R. Q. (2016). Virtual engineering sciences learning lab: Giving STEM education a second life. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 18–30.
Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Chen, J. C. (2016). The crossroads of English language learners, task-based instruction, and 3D multi-user virtual learning in Second Life. Computers & Education, 102, 152–171.
Clark, D., Weinberger, A., Jucks, I., Spitulnik, M., & Wallace, R. (2003). Designing effective science inquiry in text-based computer supported collaborative learning environments. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research & Practice, 4(1), 55–82.
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 9–19.
Danish, J. A., Enyedy, N., Saleh, A., Lee, C., & Andrade, A. (2015). Science through technology enhanced play: Designing to support reflection through play and embodiment. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine & S. Ludvigsen (Hrsg.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) conference 2015 (Bd. 1, S. 332–339). Gothenburg: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Dillenbourg, P. (Hrsg.). (1999). What do you mean by „collaborative learning“? In Collaborative learning. Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam/Boston: Elsevier.
Dillenbourg, P., & Evans, M. (2011). Interactive tabletops in education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 491–514.
Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2006). Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments. Computers & Education, 47(3), 298–315.
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Zottmann, J., & Weinberger, A. (2013). Collaboration scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan & A. M. O’Donnel (Hrsg.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (S. 403–419). New York/London: Routledge.
Gijlers, H., Weinberger, A., van Dijk, A. M., Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. (2013). Collaborative drawing on a shared digital canvas in elementary science education: The effects of script and task awareness support. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(4), 427–453.
Hsiao, I. Y. T., Yang, S. J. H., & Chu, C. J. (2015). The effects of collaborative models in second life on French learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(5), 645–670.
Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help? Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational success story. Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Vermeulen, M. (2013). Social aspects of CSCL environments: A research framework. Educational Psychologist, 48(4), 229–242.
Leuders, T. (2015). Aufgaben in Forschung und Praxis. In R. Bruder, L. Hefendehl-Hebeker, B. Schmidt-Thieme & H.-G. Weigand (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Mathematikdidaktik (S. 435–460). Heidelberg: Springer.
Ligorio, M. B., & Van der Meijden, H. (2008). Teacher guidelines for cross-national virtual communities in primary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(1), 11–25.
Linn, M. C., Clark, D., & Slotta, J. D. (2003). WISE design for knowledge integration. Science Education, 87(4), 517–538.
Mager, R. F. (1965). Lernziele und Programmierter Unterricht. Weinheim: Beltz.
Maier, U., Kleinknecht, M., Metz, K., & Bohl, T. (2010). Ein allgemeindidaktisches Kategoriensystem zur Analyse des kognitiven Potentials von Aufgaben. Beiträge zur Lehrerbildung, 28, 84–96.
Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2009). Trends and issues of regulative support use during inquiry learning: Patterns from three studies. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 795–803.
McKeown, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Jeong, H., Hartley, K., Faulkner, R., & Emmanuel, N. (2017). A meta-synthesis of CSCL literature in STEM education. In Proceedings 12th CSCL 2017 conference (S. 439–446). Philadelphia: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Meier, A., Spada, H., & Rummel, N. (2007). A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9005-x.
Mercier, E. M., Higgins, S. E., & da Costa, L. (2014). Different leaders: Emergent organizational and intellectual leadership in children’s collaborative learning groups. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(4), 397–432.
Moed, A., Otto, O., Pal, J., Singh, U. P., Kam, M., & Toyama, K. (2009). Reducing dominance in multiple-mouse learning activities. CSCL, 2009, 360–364.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentce-Hall.
Raes, A., Schellens, T., De Wever, B., & Benoit, D. F. (2016). Promoting metacognitive regulation through collaborative problem solving on the web: When scripting does not work. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 325–342.
Renkl (2007). Kooperatives Lernen. In W. Schneider & Hasselhorn (Hrsg.), Handbuch für Psychologie, Bd. Pädagogische Psychologie (S. 84–94). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Rick, J., Kopp, D., Schmitt, L., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Tarzan and Jane Share an iPad. In O. Lindwall, P. Häkkinen, T. Koschman, P. Tchounikine & S. Ludvigsen (Hrsg.), Exploring the material conditions of learning: The computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) conference 2015 (Bd. 1, S. 356–363). Gothenburg: The International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Hrsg.), Computer supported collaborative learning (S. 69–97). Berlin: Springer.
Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: Impact on students’ mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(4), 399–419.
Schneps, M. H., Ruel, J., Sonnert, G., Dussault, M., Griffin, M., & Sadler, P. M. (2014). Conceptualizing astronomical scale: Virtual simulations on handheld tablet computers reverse misconceptions. Computers & Education, 70, 269–280.
Stahl, G. (2006). Supporting group cognition in an online math community: A cognitive tool for small-group referencing in text chat. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35(2), 103–122.
Stahl, G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Hrsg.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (S. 409–426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stanton, D., Neale, H., & Bayon, V. (2002). Interfaces to support children’s co-present collaboration: multiple mice and tangible technologies. In G. Stahl (Hrsg.), Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundations for a CSCL community (S. 583–584). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic.
Szewkis, E., Nussbaum, M., Rosen, T., Abalos, J., Denardin, F., Caballero, D. & Alcoholado, C. et al. (2011). Collaboration within large groups in the classroom. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(4), 561–575.
Teasley, S. D. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säliö, C. Pontevorvo & B. Burge (Hrsg.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning. Essays on situated cognition (S. 361–384). Berlin: Springer.
Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. The international Journal of Higher Education, 32(3), 321–345.
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). „Mapping to know“: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264–286.
Tsovaltzi, D., Judele, R., Puhl, T., & Weinberger, A. (2015). Scripts, individual preparation and group awareness support in the service of learning in Facebook: How does CSCL compare to social networking sites? Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 577–592.
Van Bruggen, J. M., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). External representation of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 121–138.
Van Drie, J., Van Boxtel, C., Jaspers, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2005). Effects of representational guidance on domain specific reasoning in CSCL. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 575–602.
Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Manlove, S. (2005). Co-Lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(4), 671–688.
Walker, E., Rummel, N., & Koedinger, K. R. (2011). Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 6(2), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9111-2.
Webb, N. W. (2013). Information processing approaches to collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, A. Chinn, C. K. K. Chan & A. M. O’Donnel (Hrsg.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (S. 19–40). New York/London: Routledge.
Weinberger, A. (2017). Orchestrierungsmodelle und -szenarien technologie-unterstützten Lernens. In S. Ladel, J. Knopf & A. Weinberger (Hrsg.), Digitalisierung und Bildung (S. 117–139). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Weinberger, A., & Mandl, H. (2003). Computer-mediated knowledge communication. Studies in Communication Sciences, 3(3), 81–105.
Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Weinberger, A., Hartmann, C., Schmitt, L.J., Rummel, N. (2018). Computer-unterstützte kooperative Lernszenarien. In: Niegemann, H., Weinberger, A. (eds) Lernen mit Bildungstechnologien. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_20-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54373-3_20-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-54373-3
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Psychologie