Zusammenfassung
Der Artikel widmet sich der Frage, inwiefern Crowdsourcing eine Innovation ist. Es wird erstens gezeigt, dass im Rahmen von Crowdwork die Organisation bestimmter Arbeitsprozesse, vor allem hinsichtlich der Zusammensetzung der Erwerbstätigen, der Arbeitsinhalte, der Steuerungs- und Kontrollmechanismen, der Flexibilität und der Gratifikation, erneuert wird. Zweitens weichen crowdsourcing-basierte Innovationen hinsichtlich der beteiligten Akteure, des Anwendungsfeldes, der Entscheidungsmechanismen und des Resultates von klassischen Varianten ab.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Keineswegs ist Crowdvoting der einzige Schließungsmechanismus im Rahmen crowdsourcing-basierten Innovierens. So finden sich daneben beispielsweise auch die einfache interne Bewertung der Ideen und die Auswahl der Ideen durch interne oder externe Experten als weitere Modi (Mergel 2015).
Literatur
Afuah, Allan, und Christopher L. Tucci. 2012. Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Managment Review 37(3): 355–375.
Ali-Hassan, Hossam, und Hesham Allam. 2016. Comparing crowdsourcing initiatives: Toward a typology development. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences Revue 33(4): 318–331.
ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie. 2016. Onlinenutzung. http://www.ard-zdf-onlinestudie.de/index.php?id=561. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.
Armisen, Albert, und Ann Majchrzak. 2015. Tapping the innovative business potential of innovation contests. Business Horizons 58(4): 389–399.
Battistella, Cinzia, und Fabio Nonino. 2012. Open innovation web-based platforms: The impact of different forms of motivation on collaboration. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice 14(4): 557–575.
Bayus, Berry L. 2013. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the Dell Idea Storm community. Management Science 59(1): 226–244.
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Boes, Andreas, Tobias Kämpf, Barbara Langes, Thomas Lühr, und Steffen Steglich. 2014. Cloudworking und die Zukunft der Arbeit. Kritische Analysen am Beispiel der Strategie „Generation Open“ von IBM. Kassel: Beratungsstelle für Technologiefolgen und Qualifizierung.
Bogers, Marcel, und Joel West. 2012. Managing distributed innovation: Strategic utilization of open and user innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management 21(1): 61–75.
Boudreau, Kevin J., und Karim R. Lakhani. 2014. „Open“ disclosure of innovations, incentives and follow-on Reuse: Theory on processes of cumulative innovation and a field experiment in computational biology. Research Policy 44(1): 4–19.
Brabham, Daren C. 2012. The myth of the amateur crowds. Information, Communication & Society 15(3): 394–410.
Carstensen, Tanja. 2015. Neue Anforderungen und Belastungen durch digitale und mobile Technologien. WSI-Mitteilungen 68(3): 187–193.
Chesbrough, Henry W. 2003. Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Cho, Chanwoo, und Sungjoo Lee. 2015. How firms can get ideas from users for sustainable business innovation. Sustainability 7(12): 16039–16059. https://doi.org/10.3390/su71215802.
Chua, Roy Y. J., Yannig Roth, und Jean-François Lemoine. 2015. The impact of culture on creativity: How cultural tightness and cultural distance affect global innovation crowdsourcing work. Administrative Science Quarterly 60(2): 189–227.
Davis, Jeffrey R., Elizabeth E. Richard, und Kathryn E. Keeton. 2015. Open innovation at NASA: A new business model for advancing human health and performance innovations. Research-Technology Management 58(3): 52–58.
Djelassi, Souad, und Isabelle Decoopman. 2013. Customers’ participation in product development through crowdsourcing: Issues and implications. Industrial Marketing Management 42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2013.05.006.
Dong, John Qi, und Weifang Wu. 2015. Business value of social media technologies: Evidence from online user innovation communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.04.003.
Felin, Teppo, Karim R. Lakhani, und Michael L. Tushman. 2017. Firms, crowds, and innovation. Strategic Organization 15(2): 119–140.
Ghezzi, Antonio, Donata Gabelloni, Antonella Martini, und Angelo Natalicchio. 2017. Crowdsourcing: A review and suggestions for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12135.
Gonzalez-Garcia, Yejun, D. Enrique Xu, und J. Ribeiro-Soriano. 2015. Crowdsourcing, innovation and firm performance. Management Decision 53(6): 1158–1169.
Guo, Bin, Zhu Wang, Yu Zhiwen, Yu Wang, Neil Y. Yen, Runhe Huang, und Xingshe Zhou. 2015. Mobile crowd sensing and computing. ACM Computing Surveys 48(1): 1–31.
Hippel, Eric von. 1994. „Sticky information“ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science 40(4): 429–439.
Hippel, Eric von. 2005. Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hoornaert, Steven, Michel Ballings, Edward C. Malthouse, und Dirk Van den Poel. 2017. Identifying new product ideas: Waiting for the wisdom of the crowd or screening ideas in real time. Journal of Product Innovation Management 34(5): 580–597.
Horton, John Joseph, und Lydia B. Chilton. 2009. The labor economics of paid crowdsourcing. In EC 10 proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on electronic commerce, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 209–218.
Hossain, Mokter, und Ilkka Kauranen. 2015. Crowdsourcing: A comprehensive literature review. Strategic Outsourcing: An International Journal 8(1): 2–22.
Howe, Jeff. 2006. The rise of crowdsourcing. https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.
Huang, Yan, Param Vir Singh, und Kannan Srinivasan. 2014. Crowdsourcing new product ideas under consumer learning. Management Science 60(9): 2138–2159.
Kleemann, Frank, G. Günter Voß, und Kerstin Rieder. 2008. Un(der)paid innovators. The commercial utilization of consumer work through crowdsourcing. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 4(1): 5–26.
Kristensson, Per, Jonas Matthing, und Niklas Johansson. 2008. Key strategies for the successful involvement of customers in the co-creation of new technology-based services. International Journal of Service Industry Management 19(4): 474–491.
Kuhn, Kristine M. 2016. The rise of the „gig economy“ and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2015.129.
Leimeister, Jan Marco, und Shkodran Zogaj. 2013. Neue Arbeitsorganisation durch Crowdsourcing. Eine Literaturstudie. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.
Leimeister, Jan Marco, und Shkodran Zogaj. 2016. Crowd Worker in Deutschland: Eine empirische Studie zum Arbeitsumfeld auf externen Crowdsourcing-Plattformen. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.
Mack, Thomas, und Christian Landau. 2015. Winners, losers, and deniers: Self-selection in crowd innovation contests and the roles of motivation, creativity, and skills. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 37(3): 52–64.
Malhotra, Arvind, Ann Majchrzak, und Rebecca M. Niemiec. 2017. Using public crowds for open strategy formulation: Mitigating the risks of knowledge gaps. Long Range Planning 50(3): 397–410.
Mergel, Ines. 2015. Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review 33(5): 599–612.
Mollick, Ethan, und Venkat Kuppuswamy. 2016. Crowdfunding: Evidence on the democratization of startup funding. In Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities and open innovation, Hrsg. Dietmar Harhoff und Karim R. Lakhani, 537–559. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Montelisciani, Gabriele, Donata Gabelloni, Giacomo Tazzini, und Gualtiero Fantoni. 2014. Skills and wills: The keys to identify the right team in collaborative innovation platforms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 26(6): 687–702.
Montgomerie, Johanna, und Samuel Roscoe. 2013. Owning the consumer: Getting to the core of the Apple business model. Accounting Forum: Advancing the Interdisciplinary and Global Connection of Accounting Research 37(4): 290–299.
mturk tracker. 2017. Top-1000 Requesters, report for March 31, 2017 to April 30, 2017. http://www.mturk-tracker.com/#/toprequesters. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.
Nakatsu, Robbie T., Elissa B. Grossman, und Charalambos L. Iacovou. 2014. A taxonomy of crowdsourcing based on task complexity. Journal of Information Science 40(6): 823–834.
Natalicchio, Angelo, Antonio Messeni Petruzzelli, und Claudio Garavelli. 2017. Innovation problems and search for solutions in crowdsourcing platforms – A simulation approach. Technovation 64–65:28–42.
Papsdorf, Christian. 2009. Wie Surfen zu Arbeit wird. Crowdsourcing im Web 2.0. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.
Papsdorf, Christian. 2016. The value of crowdfunding. The significance of community-financed projects beyond the act of financing. In Open tourism – Open innovation, crowdsourcing and collaborative consumption challenging the tourism industry, Hrsg. Roman Egger, Igor Gula und Dominik Walcher, 121–136. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Pfeiffer, Sabine. 2004. Arbeitsvermögen. Ein Schlüssel zur Analyse (reflexiver) Informatisierung. Wiesbaden: Verlag Sozialwissenschaften.
Poetz, Marion K., und Martin Schreier. 2012. The value of crowdsourcing: Can users really compete with professionals in generating new product ideas. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29(2): 245–256.
Schmidt, Gordon B., und William M. Jettinghoff. 2016. Using Amazon Mechanical Turk and other compensated crowdsourcing sites. Business Horizons 59(4): 391–400.
Schweitzer, Fiona Maria, Walter Buchinger, Oliver Gassmann, und Marianna Obrist. 2012. Crowdsourcing: Leveraging innovation through online idea competitions. Research-Technology Management 55(3): 32–38.
Seidel, Victor P., Benedikt Langner, und Jonathan Sims. 2016. Dominant communities and dominant designs: Community-based innovation in the context of the technology life cycle. Strategic Organization 15(2): 1–22.
Simula, Henri, und Tuomas Ahola. 2014. A network perspective on idea and innovation crowdsourcing in industrial firms. Industrial Marketing Management 43(3): 400–408.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Papsdorf, C. (2019). Crowdsourcing als neuartige Form der Arbeitsorganisation und des Innovierens. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_56-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_56-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften