Skip to main content

Technology and Rorty’s Cultural Politics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Richard Rorty
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

In Sect. 1, I point out the tension in Rorty’s commitment to both pragmatism and materialism. In Sect. 2, I explain how Rorty sought to justify this combination, and argue that his account is not only implausible but incomplete. In Sect. 3, I explain what I think is the underlying reason for Rorty’s commitment to materialism, namely to promote the social utility of technology for eliminating extreme poverty. After showing how this stance fits into a standard discourse of scientific rationalism, to which a strong opposing case can be made, I conclude, in Sect. 4, that Rorty’s notion of philosophy as cultural politics could be a very useful approach to new technological developments, capable of revitalizing philosophy’s public voice; but only if detached from Rorty’s anti-philosophical agenda.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Thanks to Bjørn Ramberg for persuading me to tone down my point here.

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Rorty’s glowing review of Dennett’s Consciousness Explained (Rorty 1991a) – Dennett’s main work, in which Rorty’s ideas make a significant entrance at the end (Dennett 1991, p. 461); or see Dennett’s appraisal of the importance Rorty had for young materialists like himself in the 1960s (Dennett 2014, p. vii).

  3. 3.

    For Rorty’s original advocacy of a non-metaphysical materialism, see Rorty 1979, pp. 114–125; for discussion, see Tartaglia 2007, pp. 94–97. As I pointed out in the latter, he officially abandoned eliminative materialism in Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. But he only rejected it construed as a metaphysical claim – his non-metaphysical materialism remained as eliminative as ever, as can be seen by his later endorsements of Dennett and of the whole Rylean tradition which taught us, as Rorty saw it, not to take consciousness seriously. See Tartaglia 2017 and 2019, which have references to all of Rorty’s key writings on these issues.

  4. 4.

    Thanks to Martin Müller for the comparison to Rorty’s liberalism.

  5. 5.

    Interestingly, Rorty excludes China from “the North,” thereby showing a surprising lack of foresight for the man who predicted the rise of Donald Trump (Rorty 1999c/1998, pp. 89–90).

  6. 6.

    Like Rorty, Gray has demonstrated impressive prophetic powers (see Gray 2004c/2003).

References

  • Ben-Ami, Daniel. 2010. Ferraris for all: In defence of economic progress. Bristol: Polity.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness explained. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 2014. Foreword. In Mind, language, and metaphilosophy: Early philosophical papers, by Richard Rorty, Eds. Stephen Leach and James Tartaglia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 2017a. From bacteria to Bach and back. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, Daniel. 2017b. Interview with Carole Cadwalladr: I begrudge every hour I have to spend thinking about politics. In The Observer; online at: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/feb/12/daniel-dennett-politics-bacteria-bach-back-dawkins-trump-interview

  • Diamandis, Peter H., and Steven Kotler. 2014. Abundance: The future is better than you think. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. 2016. Materialism. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 2004a. A report to the academy. In Heresies: Against progress and other illusions, 72–79. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 2004b. Biotechnology and the post-human future. In Heresies: Against progress and other illusions, 24–31. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 2004c. On the eve of war: American power and impotence. In Heresies: Against progress and other illusions, 139–144. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, Kevin. 2016. The inevitable: Understanding the 12 technological forces that will shape our world. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, Steven. 2018. Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism and progress. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. 1983. Why there isn’t a ready-made world. In Realism and reason: Philosophical papers, volume 3, 205–228. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Matt. 2010. The rational optimist: How prosperity evolves. London: Fourth Estate.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, Matt. 2015. The evolution of everything: How small changes transform our world. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1982/1981. Nineteenth-century idealism and twentieth-century textualism. In Consequences of pragmatism, 139–159. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1991a. Blunder around for a while. London Review of Books 13: 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1991b. Non-reductive physicalism. In Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers, volume 1, 113–125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1998/1993. Hilary Putnam and the relativist menace. In Truth and progress: Philosophical papers, volume 3, 43–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1999a. Love and money. In Philosophy and social hope, 223–228. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1999b. A world without substances or essences. In Philosophy and social hope, 47–71. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1999c. Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2007/2002. Cultural politics and the question of the existence of God. In Philosophy as cultural politics: philosophical papers, volume 4, 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2009/2006–7. Responses to critics. In Rorty, pragmatism, and Confucianism: With responses by Richard Rorty, Ed. Yong Huang, 279–300. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2010/2006–7. Reply to Harvey Cormier. In The philosophy of Richard Rorty, Eds. Randall E. Auxier and Lewis Edwin Hahn, 102–105. Chicago: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Alex. 2011. The Atheist’s guide to reality. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklovski, Iosif, and Carl Sagan. 1966. Intelligent life in the universe. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartaglia, James. 2007. Rorty and the mirror of nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartaglia, James. 2017. Rorty and the problem of consciousness. In Consciousness and the great philosophers, Eds. Stephen Leach and James Tartaglia. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tartaglia, James. 2019. Rorty’s philosophy of consciousness. In A companion to Rorty, Ed. Alan Malachowski. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegmark, Max. 2017. Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

Recommended Literature for Further Reading

  • Rorty, Richard. 1982/1981. Nineteenth-century idealism and twentieth-century textualism. In Consequences of pragmatism, 139–159. Brighton: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • This is the main source for Rorty’s historical story about the progression from idealism to pragmatism, as he saw it. It is also an attempt by Rorty to distance his own views from idealism. It is one of Rorty’s classic papers, I think.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1999/1992. Love and money. In Philosophy and social hope, 223–228. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • This short piece is the key to understanding the connection in Rorty’s mind between metaphysical materialism and technological progress, in my view.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2007/2004. Cultural politics and the question of the existence of God. In Philosophy as cultural politics: philosophical papers, volume 4, 3–26. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • This article, written toward the end of Rorty’s career, is the clearest statement and defense of his notion of “philosophy as cultural politics.” It contains interesting reflections on both religion and recent debates in the philosophy of consciousness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, John. 2004. Heresies: Against progress and other illusions. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray is always outspoken and fascinating to read. His main stance is that the idea of progress is an illusion inherited from religious belief; I find this collection of papers a marked improvement on his better-known Straw Dogs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, Robert C., and Val Dusek, Eds. 2003. Philosophy of technology: The technological condition, an anthology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • An excellent introduction to the philosophy of technology, containing both historical and contemporary readings.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Tartaglia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Tartaglia, J. (2022). Technology and Rorty’s Cultural Politics. In: Müller, M. (eds) Handbuch Richard Rorty. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_39-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_39-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16260-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16260-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics