Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download reference work entry PDF
Synonyms
Williams-Beuren syndrome
Short Description or Definition
Williams syndrome (WS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is caused by a hemizygous microdeletion of chromosome 7q11.23, with an incidence of 1 in 7,500 live births. (Note that a duplication of the same region results in Duplication 7 syndrome, with a differing phenotype.) A characteristic physical, cognitive, and personality phenotype is present, with some variability. Physical features of WS include dysmorphic facial features, stunted growth, and musculoskeletal problems, as well as connective tissue abnormalities including congenital heart abnormalities. Cognitive features include delayed development, intellectual functioning typically in the range of mild intellectual disability (ID), a marked relative weakness in visuospatial constructive skills, with general language functioning at the level of overall functioning. Personality features include overfriendliness and sociability coupled with social skills difficulties, attention problems, and anxiety.
Categorization
Classification of WS is based on results of FISH testing for the hemizygous microdeletion of the Elastin (ELN) gene. More detailed molecular genetic testing can reveal the breakpoints of the deletion. The genes in the classic WS deletion are illustrated in Fig. 1. There is some variability in the breakpoints, with evidence that people with deletions smaller than the entire WS region often exhibit a partial phenotype, while individuals with longer deletions that include greater telomeric effect, including gene GTF2I, have greater deficits in cognitive functioning (Morris et al. 2003). Examinations of the role of specific genes in the WS region also point to a role of ELN in connective tissue abnormalities, including cardiovascular symptoms (Ewart et al. 1993) and LIMK1 (Lim kinase 1) in visuospatial construction difficulties (Frangiskakis et al. 1996). While the facial gestalt associated with WS is universally found, the specific facial features show some variability, as do the medical, cognitive, and behavioral symptoms (for a review, see Mervis and Morris 2007).
Epidemiology
The incidence of WS is 1 in 7,500 live births (Stromme et al. 2002). The vast majority of cases are spontaneous mutations. The syndrome follows an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance in that the child of a person with WS has a 50% chance of having WS. The deletions are presumed to occur because of uneven crossover during meiosis.
Natural History, Prognostic Factors, and Outcomes
WS was first identified in 1961 by the cardiologist Williams of New Zealand who identified a group of patients presenting with similar symptoms indicative of a heart defect, a unique facial appearance, and below-average cognitive functioning (Williams et al. 1961) (Fig. 2). Soon after, a second group, in Germany, described patients with similar symptoms (Beuren et al. 1962). The syndrome was subsequently named in honor of the two physicians leading the teams, Williams and Beuren. The genetic etiology of WS was identified because of the high rate of supravalvular aortic stenosis (SVAS), which was shown to result from a mutation of the ELN gene on chromosome 7q (Ewart et al. 1993).
The facial features associated with WS, identifiable beginning in infancy, are the cardinal feature of the disorder. All children with WS show at least 9 of 17 facial features, which include broad brow, bitemporal narrowing, periorbital fullness, epicanthal folds, stellate or lacy iris pattern, strabismus, short upturned nose, full or bulbous nasal tip, malar hypoplasia, long philtrum, full prominent lips, full cheeks, wide mouth, small jaw, small and widely spaced teeth, dental malocclusion, and prominent earlobes (Morris 2006a). (Note that these features can be seen in other children with developmental delays, but only WS is associated with many of these features together.)
WS is associated with a number of medical difficulties (Morris 2006b). About half of neonates are small based on standard growth curves, and adult stature is generally short. Eighty percent of children with WS have cardiovascular disease of some kind, with 75% with SVAS and 50% showing peripheral pulmonary stenosis (PPS). Hypotonia is commonly observed beginning in infancy and is associated with feeding difficulties and motor development delays. Older children are typically hypertonic. Fine motor difficulties and balance difficulties are commonly seen. Gastrointestinal difficulties such as gastroesophageal reflux, constipation, and colic are common, as are inguinal hernias. These features result in a 70% rate of failure to thrive in infancy. Hypercalcemia is present in approximately 15% of children and is thought to be underdiagnosed; therefore, Vitamin D supplements are not recommended, and calcium monitoring is recommended for those who have a history of hypercalcemia. Urinary tract malformation is present in about 35% of children with WS, and bladder capacity is typically reduced. There is also an increased rate of endocrine difficulties such as hypothyroidism, early puberty, and diabetes mellitus. Vision difficulties are also common, particularly strabismus. Chronic otitis media is present in about 50% of children with WS. Recent studies indicate an increased incidence of progressive sensorineural hearing loss beginning in the school-age years. Hypersensitivity to sound is commonly seen. The life expectancy in WS is normal unless there is a serious cardiovascular condition.
Neuropsychology and Psychology of WS
Intellectual disability is present for the vast majority of individuals with WS, with functioning typically in the mild to moderate intellectual disability range, and about 25% of individuals with functioning in the borderline to average range (Mervis et al. 2000). A distinctive cognitive profile is characteristically found across development, with a relative strength in auditory short-term memory, language abilities at or above general cognitive ability levels, and a significant relative weakness in visuospatial constructive skills and fine motor dexterity (Mervis et al. 2000). While language development is typically delayed, fluid spontaneous language is usually ultimately present (Bellugi et al. 1990). Some have pointed to language abilities as preserved; however, general consensus is that impairments in grammatical abilities, vocabulary, and pragmatics are indeed present in comparison to same-aged peers (Mervis and Morris 2007). Particular difficulties with relational vocabulary are noted. There is evidence of a strong reliance on phonological memory skills in language development (Robinson et al. 2003). In terms of adaptive functioning, personal care and domestic responsibility skills are typically areas of significant relative weakness, with milder delays also found in communication and socialization (Mervis et al. 2001). Executive functioning impairments have also been noted in the areas of set shifting, verbal and spatial working memory, and planning (Hocking et al. 2015; Lanfranchi et al. 2015; Rhodes et al. 2010, 2011a).
A distinctive personality profile is also typically present, characterized by high sociability coupled with anxiety (Klein-Tasman and Mervis 2003). The intense interest in interaction with others is observable even in infancy (Mervis et al. 2003) and continues throughout development (Ng et al. 2014). Despite this sociability, people with WS typically have difficulty establishing sustained friendships with peers (Davies et al. 1997, 1998) and social-communicative deficits are usually present and can overlap with the autism spectrum (Klein-Tasman et al. 2007, 2009; Laws and Bishop 2004). Elevated levels of anxiety, fear, or worry are commonly reported, with specific phobia rates upward of 50%. Anticipatory anxiety is particularly common. Recent research suggests that more anxiety is associated with greater social difficulty (Riby et al. 2014). Significant attention problems are present in up to 65% of people with WS (Dykens 2003; Leyfer et al. 2006). The attention and inhibitory difficulties noted (Greer et al. 2013; Rhodes et al. 2011b) are suggested to be related to difficulty inhibiting social approach (Little et al. 2013). High levels of sound sensitivity have been observed (Jarvinen et al. 2012; Zarchi et al. 2015), with accompanying problem behaviors in response to this sensory sensitivity (Gallo et al. 2008; Janes et al. 2014; Levitin et al. 2005; Riby et al. 2013).
Studies have had mixed findings regarding face-processing abilities and theory of mind development. Performance on tasks of face recognition is similar to mental age-matched controls (Deruelle et al. 1999), though there seems to be a distinctive pattern of activation when processing facial expressions (Doherty-Sneddon et al. 2009; Mills et al. 2000). Findings are mixed about whether facial processing is holistic (Tager-Flusberg et al. 2003) or piecemeal (Gagliardi et al. 2003) and whether those with WS have difficulty with disengaging from faces (Doherty-Sneddon et al. 2009, 2013; Hanley et al. 2013; Riby et al. 2011). Attention bias to emotional or threatening faces is frequently studied (Kirk et al. 2013; McGrath et al. 2016). While early research suggested theory of mind might be stronger than that of children with some other developmental disabilities, more detailed studies have found some difficulties when compared to typically developing peers (Hanley et al. 2013; Tager-Flusberg and Sullivan 2000).
Results of neuroimaging investigations have indicated overall reduction in brain size, significant reductions in cerebral and brainstem volumes, no differences in cerebellar volume, and significant reductions in occipital cortex and thalamic gray matter after controlling for brain size (Reiss et al. 2004). Increased cortical thickness in WS, as well as reduced surface area, suggested to be related to reduced brain volume overall, have also been observed (Green et al. 2016). Significantly larger amygdala, superior temporal gyrus, orbital prefrontal cortex, and dorsal anterior cingulate have also been identified. Reduced levels of functional connectivity in the WS brain have been found (Vega et al. 2015). fMRI investigation found consistent hypoactivation of an area of the parietal cortex commonly associated with visuospatial construction tasks (Meyer-Lindenberg et al. 2004), with structural MRI showing gray matter reduction in the parietooccipital/intraparietal sulcus (Kippenhan et al. 2005). Significantly diminished amygdala activity in response to viewing threatening faces and, conversely, increased activity while viewing threatening scenes, relative to age, sex, and IQ-matched controls, were observed (Meyer-Lindenberg et al. 2005). Reduced activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, and striatum in the WS group during a Go/NoGo task has also been found (Mobbs et al. 2007).
Evaluation
FISH test is typically conducted when WS is suspected and is the accepted method of diagnosis.
Treatment
There is no cure for WS. Optimal treatment consists of multidisciplinary involvement to address the medical, psychiatric, and neuropsychological sequelae of the disorder. As there is variability in the phenotype, the need for health-care services also varies considerably across individuals. Guidelines regarding medical management are available from the American Academy of Pediatrics ( 2001) and Morris (2006a, b) and are updated regularly on the Williams Syndrome Association website (For more information, see the Williams Syndrome Association website: www.williams-syndrome.org.). Special education services are generally necessary, with many children educated in mainstream classrooms with support. Phonetic approaches to reading instruction are more beneficial than whole word approaches. Speech, occupational, and physical therapy are typically needed. Psychotropic medication is often used, including stimulants and nonstimulant medication for attention problems, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for anxiety and mood difficulty. Careful monitoring and consultation with cardiology is strongly recommended, especially for children with a history of cardiovascular involvement. Psychotherapeutic techniques such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety and social skills training may prove beneficial to address fears and improve coping skills (Phillips and Klein-Tasman 2009).
Psychoeducational and/or neuropsychological assessment can play an important role in the development of academic intervention strategies for children and adolescents with WS (see Klein-Tasman et al. 2008 for an example). At the very least, administration of intellectual, adaptive behavior, and academic achievement measures designed to assess for the presence of ID, learning disability, and relative strengths and weaknesses is recommended. Examination of receptive and expressive language, visual-spatial skills, and attentional resources may also prove helpful in the development of an Individualized Education Plan. Occupational and speech therapy are often needed. Educating teachers and other service providers about the difficulties commonly experienced in WS may help them to anticipate needs that may arise as the child progresses through school.
Cross-References
References and Readings
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Genetics. (2001). Healthcare supervision for children with Williams syndrome. Pediatrics, 107, 1192–1204.
Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A., Jernigan, T., Trauner, D., & Doherty, S. (1990). Neuropsychological, neurological, and neuroanatomical profile of Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, Supplement, 6, 115–125.
Beuren, A. J., Apitz, J., & Harmjanz, D. (1962). Supravalvular aortic stenosis in association with mental retardation and a certain facial appearance. Circulation, 26, 1235–1240.
Davies, M., Howlin, P., & Udwin, O. (1997). Independence and adaptive behavior in adults with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 70(2), 188–195.
Davies, M., Udwin, O., & Howlin, P. (1998). Adults with Williams syndrome. Preliminary study of social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. British Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 273–276.
Deruelle, C., Mancini, J., Livet, M. O., Casse-Perrot, C., & de Schonen, S. (1999). Configural and local processing of faces in children with Williams syndrome. Brain and Cognition, 41(3), 276–298.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Riby, D. M., Calderwood, L., & Ainsworth, L. (2009). Stuck on you: Face-to-face arousal and gaze aversion in Williams syndrome. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 14(6), 510–523.
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Whittle, L., & Riby, D. M. (2013). Gaze aversion during social style interactions in autism spectrum disorder and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(1), 616–626.
Dykens, E. M. (2003). Anxiety, fears, and phobias in persons with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1–2), 291–316.
Ewart, A. K., Morris, C. A., Atkinson, D., Jin, W., Sternes, K., Spallone, P., et al. (1993). Hemizygosity at the elastin locus in a developmental disorder, Williams syndrome. Nature Genetics, 5(1), 11–16.
Frangiskakis, J. M., Ewart, A. K., Morris, C. A., Mervis, C. B., Bertrand, J., Robinson, B. F., et al. (1996). LIM-kinase1 hemizygosity implicated in impaired visuospatial constructive cognition. Cell, 86(1), 59–69.
Gagliardi, C., Frigerio, E., Burt, D. M., Cazzaniga, I., Perrett, D. I., & Borgatti, R. (2003). Facial expression recognition in Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 41(6), 733–738.
Gallo, F. J., Klein-Tasman, B. P., Gaffrey, M., & Curran, P. E. (2008). Expecting the worst: Observations of reactivity to sound in young children with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 29, 567–581.
Green, T., Fierro, K. C., Raman, M. M., Saggar, M., Sheau, K. E., & Reiss, A. L. (2016). Surface-based morphometry reveals distinct cortical thickness and surface area profiles in Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics : The Official Publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32422.
Greer, J., Riby, D. M., Hamiliton, C., & Riby, L. M. (2013). Attentional lapse and inhibition control in adults with Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(11), 4170–4177.
Hanley, M., Riby, D. M., Caswell, S., Rooney, S., & Back, E. (2013). Looking and thinking: How individuals with Williams syndrome make judgements about mental states. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(12), 4466–4476.
Hocking, D. R., Reeve, J., & Porter, M. A. (2015). Characterising the profile of everyday executive functioning and relation to IQ in adults with Williams syndrome: Is the BRIEF adult version a valid rating scale? PLoS One, 10(9), e0137628.
Janes, E., Riby, D. M., & Rodgers, J. (2014). Exploring the prevalence and phenomenology of repetitive behaviours and abnormal sensory processing in children with Williams syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research: JIDR, 58(8), 746–757.
Jarvinen, A., Dering, B., Neumann, D., Ng, R., Crivelli, D., Grichanik, M., …, & Bellugi, U. (2012). Sensitivity of the autonomic nervous system to visual and auditory affect across social and non-social domains in Williams syndrome.
Kippenhan, J. S., Olsen, R. K., Mervis, C. B., Morris, C. A., Kohn, P., Lindenberg, A. M., et al. (2005). Genetic contributions to human gyrification: Sulcal morphometry in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(34), 7840–7846.
Kirk, H. E., Hocking, D. R., Riby, D. M., & Cornish, K. M. (2013). Linking social behaviour and anxiety to attention to emotional faces in Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(12), 4608–4616.
Klein-Tasman, B. P., & Mervis, C. B. (2003). Distinctive personality characteristics of 8-, 9-, and 10-year-olds with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1–2), 269–290.
Klein-Tasman, B. P., Mervis, C. B., Lord, C. E., & Phillips, K. D. (2007). Socio-communicative deficits in young children with Williams syndrome: Performance on the autism diagnostic observation schedule. Child Neuropsychology, 13, 444–467.
Klein-Tasman, B. P., Gallo, F. J., Phillips, K. D., & Fine, K. M. (2008). It helps to know genetic basis: Williams syndrome as an example of cognitive disability. In J. Apps, R. F. Newby, & L. Roberts (Eds.), Telling stories: Pediatric neuropsychology case studies from the exceptional to the commonplace. New York: Springer.
Klein-Tasman, B. P., Phillips, K. D., Lord, C., Mervis, C. B., & Gallo, F. G. (2009). Overlap with the autism spectrum in young children with Williams syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 30, 289–299.
Lanfranchi, S., De Mori, L., Mammarella, I. C., Carretti, B., & Vianello, R. (2015). Spatial-sequential and spatial-simultaneous working memory in individuals with Williams syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120(3), 193–202.
Laws, G., & Bishop, D. (2004). Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: A comparison with Down’s syndrome and specific language impairment. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 39(1), 45–64.
Levitin, D. J., Cole, K., Lincoln, A., & Bellugi, U. (2005). Aversion, awareness, and attraction: Investigating claims of hyperacusis in the Williams syndrome phenotype. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(5), 514–523.
Leyfer, O. T., Woodruff-Borden, J., Klein-Tasman, B. P., Fricke, J. S., & Mervis, C. B. (2006). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in 4 to 16-year-olds with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 141B, 615–622.
Little, K., Riby, D. M., Janes, E., Clark, F., Fleck, R., & Rodgers, J. (2013). Heterogeneity of social approach behaviour in Williams syndrome: The role of response inhibition. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(3), 959–967.
McGrath, L. M., Oates, J. M., Dai, Y. G., Dodd, H. F., Waxler, J., Clements, C. C., …, & Smoller, J. W. (2016). Attention bias to emotional faces varies by IQ and anxiety in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-016-2748-y.
Mervis, C. B., & Morris, C. A. (2007). Williams syndrome. In M. M. Mazzocco & J. L. Ross (Eds.), Neurogenetic developmental disorders: Variations of manifestations in childhood. London: MIT Press.
Mervis, C. B., Robinson, B. F., Bertrand, J., Morris, C. A., Klein-Tasman, B. P., & Armstrong, S. C. (2000). The Williams syndrome cognitive profile. Brain and Cognition, 44(3), 604–628.
Mervis, C. B., Klein-Tasman, B. P., & Mastin, M. E. (2001). Adaptive behavior of 4- through 8-year-old children with Williams syndrome. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 106(1), 82–93.
Mervis, C. B., Morris, C. A., Klein-Tasman, B. P., Bertrand, J., Kwitny, S., Appelbaum, L. G., et al. (2003). Attentional characteristics of infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome during triadic interactions. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1–2), 243–268.
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Kohn, P., Mervis, C. B., Kippenhan, J. S., Olsen, R. K., Morris, C. A., et al. (2004). Neural basis of genetically determined visuospatial construction deficit in Williams syndrome. Neuron, 43(5), 623–631.
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Hariri, A. R., Munoz, K. E., Mervis, C. B., Mattay, V. S., Morris, C. A., et al. (2005). Neural correlates of genetically abnormal social cognition in Williams syndrome. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 991–993.
Mills, D. L., Alvarez, T. D., St George, M., Appelbaum, L. G., Bellugi, U., & Neville, H. (2000). III. Electrophysiological studies of face processing in Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(Suppl 1), 47–64.
Mobbs, D., Eckert, M. A., Mills, D., Korenberg, J., Bellugi, U., Galaburda, A. M., et al. (2007). Frontostriatal dysfunction during response inhibition in Williams syndrome. Biological Psychiatry, 62(3), 256–261.
Morris, C. A. (2006a). The dysmorphology, genetics, and natural history of Williams-Beuren syndrome. In C. A. Morris, H. M. Lenhoff, & P. P. Wang (Eds.), Williams-Beuren syndrome: Research, evaluation, and treatment (pp. 3–17). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Morris, C. A. (2006b). Williams syndrome [WS]. GeneClinics: Medical Genetics Knowledge Base. Web site: http://www.geneclinics.org/. Accessed 12 Jan 2009.
Morris, C. A., Mervis, C. B., Hobart, H. H., Gregg, R. G., Bertrand, J., Ensing, G. J., et al. (2003). GTF21 hemizygosity implicated in mental retardation in Williams syndrome: Genotype-phenotype analysis of five families with deletions in the Williams syndrome region. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 123A(1), 45–59.
Ng, R., Jarvinen, A., & Bellugi, U. (2014). Toward a deeper characterization of the social phenotype of Williams syndrome: The association between personality and social drive. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(8), 1838–1849.
Phillips, K. D., & Klein-Tasman, B. P. (2009). Mental health concerns in Williams syndrome: Intervention considerations and illustrations from case examples. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 2, 110–133.
Reiss, A. L., Eckert, M. A., Rose, F. E., Karchemskiy, A., Kesler, S., Chang, M., et al. (2004). An experiment of nature: Brain anatomy parallels cognition and behavior in Williams syndrome. Journal of Neuroscience, 24(21), 5009–5015.
Rhodes, S. M., Riby, D. M., Park, J., Fraser, E., & Campbell, L. E. (2010). Executive neuropsychological functioning in individuals with Williams syndrome. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1216–1226.
Rhodes, S. M., Riby, D. M., Fraser, E., & Campbell, L. E. (2011a). The extent of working memory deficits associated with Williams syndrome: Exploration of verbal and spatial domains and executively controlled processes. Brain and Cognition, 77(2), 208–214.
Rhodes, S. M., Riby, D. M., Matthews, K., & Coghill, D. R. (2011b). Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and Williams syndrome: Shared behavioral and neuropsychological profiles. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33(1), 147–156.
Riby, D. M., Jones, N., Brown, P. H., Robinson, L. J., Langton, S. R., Bruce, V., & Riby, L. M. (2011). Attention to faces in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(9), 1228–1239.
Riby, D. M., Janes, E., & Rodgers, J. (2013). Brief report: Exploring the relationship between sensory processing and repetitive behaviours in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(2), 478–482.
Riby, D. M., Hanley, M., Kirk, H., Clark, F., Little, K., Fleck, R., …, & Rodgers, J. (2014). The interplay between anxiety and social functioning in Williams syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44(5), 1220–1229.
Robinson, B. F., Mervis, C. B., & Robinson, B. W. (2003). The roles of verbal short-term memory and working memory in the acquisition of grammar by children with Williams syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, 23(1–2), 13–31.
Stromme, P., Bjornstad, P. G., & Ramstad, K. (2002). Prevalence estimation of Williams syndrome. Journal of Child Neurology, 17(4), 269–271.
Tager-Flusberg, H., & Sullivan, K. (2000). A componential view of theory of mind: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Cognition, 76(1), 59–90.
Tager-Flusberg, H., Plesa-Skwerer, D., Faja, S., & Joseph, R. M. (2003). People with Williams syndrome process faces holistically. Cognition, 89(1), 11–24.
Udwin, O., & Yule, W. (1991). A cognitive and behavioural phenotype in Williams syndrome. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13(2), 232–244.
Vega, J. N., Hohman, T. J., Pryweller, J. R., Dykens, E. M., & Thornton-Wells, T. A. (2015). Resting-state functional connectivity in individuals with down syndrome and Williams syndrome compared with typically developing controls. Brain Connectivity, 5(8), 461–475.
Williams, J. C. P., Barrat-Boyes, B. G., & Lowe, J. B. (1961). Supravalvular aortic stenosis. Circulation, 24, 1311–1318.
Zarchi, O., Avni, C., Attias, J., Frisch, A., Carmel, M., Michaelovsky, E., … , & Gothelf, D. (2015). Hyperactive auditory processing in Williams syndrome: Evidence from auditory evoked potentials. Psychophysiology, 52(6), 782–789.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
van der Fluit, F., Brei, N., Klein-Tasman, B.P.“. (2018). Williams Syndrome. In: Kreutzer, J.S., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1609
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1609
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57110-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57111-9
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences