Abstract
Technology-oriented fields are still mostly male dominated. Increasing the number of women in natural science and technology careers remains an elusive goal in EU countries. Although gender equality and nondiscrimination have been critical, longtime concerns in education, gender-related divisions continue to occur in the field of technology and the subjects that pupils decide to study. Also, significant variations between girls’ and boys’ interest and behavior have been documented in technology education. In today’s society, technology education plays an important role in providing children with opportunities and in improving their ability to interact with everyday technologies. Technology education also equips children with the necessary knowledge to perform a wide variety of jobs. In order to introduce a more equitable gender balance in higher education, technology-oriented fields, and, consequently, in the corresponding labor market, we must continue to expand our knowledge on the impact of current technology education and focus on gender-related issues. This chapter aims to discuss gender-related topics in technology education and careers. Could technology education have an impact on women and girls or potentially influence their advancement in technology-oriented fields? With the goal of achieving greater gender equality in technology fields, this chapter concludes with further directions for research and suggestions for new ways of thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes. Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender and Society, 20(4), 441–464.
Ardies, J. (2015). Students’ attitudes towards technology. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in secondary education. Doctoral dissertation. Antwerpen: Universiteit Antwerpen.
Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., & Gijbels, D. (2015a). The effect of classroom activities on students’ interest and career aspirations towards technology. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 2.
Ardies, J., De Maeyer, S., Gijbels, D., & van Keulen, H. (2015b). Students’ attitudes towards technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 43–65. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9268-x.
Auger, R. W., Blackhurst, A. E., & Wahl, K. H. (2005). The development of elementary-aged children’s career aspirations and expectations. Professional School Counseling, 8(4), 322–329.
Banks, F., & Barlex, D. (2014). Teaching STEM in the secondary school: Helping teachers meet the challenge. New York: Routledge.
Beauregard, T. A. (2007). Family influences on the career life cycle. In M. Ozbilgin & A. Malach-Pines (Eds.), Career choice in management and entrepreneurship: A research companion (pp. 101–126). London: Edward Elgar Press.
Blaine, B. E. (2007). Understanding the psychology of diversity. California: Sage.
Committee on Alleviation of Segregation. (2015). Tasa-arvotyö on taitolaji. [The work at equality takes skill]. Ministry of Education and Culture Working Group suggestions. Oppaat ja käsikirjat 2015:5.
Cross, A. (2011). In search of a pedagogy for primary design and technology. In C. Benson & J. Lunt (Eds.), International handbook of primary technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 167–180). London: Sense Publishers.
Dagan, O. (2015). Kindergarten student teachers’ attitudes towards and perceptions of technology: The impact of a one year pre-service course. In M. Chatoney (Ed.), Plurality and complementary of approaches in design & technology education. PATT29 conference (pp. 98–105). Marseille: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
Dakers, J. R. (2011). The rise of technological literacy in primary education. In C. Benson & J. Lunt (Eds.), International handbook of primary technology education. Reviewing the past twenty years (pp. 181–193). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
de Vries, M. J. (2005). Teaching about technology: An introduction to the philosophy of technology for non-philosophers. Dordrecht: Springer.
de Weerd, J., & Rommes, E. (2012). To beta or not to beta? The role of teachers in the gendered choice of science and technology by secondary school students. In C. Quaiser-Pohl & M. Endepohls-Ulpe (Eds.), Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development (pp. 63–78). Münster: Waxmann.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11(2), 135–172.
Elshof, L. (2011). Technology education: Overcoming the general motors syndrome. In M. de Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 145–162). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Elvstrand, H., Hellberg, K., & Hallström, J. (2012). Technology and gender in early childhood education: How girls and boys explore and learn technology in free play in Swedish preschools. In T. Ginner, J. Hallström, & M. Hultén (Eds.), Technology education in the 21st century. The PATT 26 conference (pp. 163–171). Stockholm: Linköping University/CETIS/KTH.
Endepohls-Ulpe, M. (2012). Are females or males disadvantaged in contemporary educational systems? In C. Quaiser-Pohl & M. Endepohls-Ulpe (Eds.), Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development (pp. 15–28). Münster: Waxmann.
Endepohls-Ulpe, M., Ebach, J., Seiter, J., & Kaul, N. (2012). Barriers and motivational factors for taking up a career in a technological field in Germany and Austria. In C. Quaiser-Pohl & M. Endepohls-Ulpe (Eds.), Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development (pp. 79–93). Münster: Waxmann.
Engström, S. (2015). The females who succeed within higher technical education: Why do they choose and who are they? Four profiles emerge through the use of cluster analysis. In M. Chatoney (Ed.), Plurality and complementary of approaches in design & technology education. PATT29 conference (pp. 120–125). Marseille: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
European Commission. (2013a). Gendered innovations. How gender analysis contributes to research. Research and innovation. Report of the expert group ‘innovation through gender’. European Commission. Luxenbourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2013b). She Figures 2012. Gender in research and innovation. Statistics and indicators. European Commission. Luxenbourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
European Commission. (2016). She Figures 2015. Gender in research and innovation. European Commission. Luxenbourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2012). Sex/gender: Biology in a social world. New York: Routledge.
Francis, B. (2010). Gender, toys and learning. Oxford Review of Education, 36(3), 325–344.
Hallström, J., Elvstrand, H., & Hellberg, K. (2015). Gender and technology in free play in Swedish early childhood education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(2), 137–149. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9274-z.
Järvinen, E.-M., & Rasinen, A. (2015). Implementing technology education in Finnish general education schools: Studying the cross-curricular theme ‘human being and technology’. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(1), 67–84. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9270-3.
Klapwijk, R., & Rommes, E. (2009). Career orientation of secondary school students (m/f) in the Netherlands. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 403–418. doi:10.1007/s10798-009-9095-7.
Layton, D. (1993). Technology's challenge to science education: cathedral, quarry, or company store? Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Lippa, R. A. (2005). Gender, nature, and nurture (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mammes, I. (2004). Promoting girls’ interest in technology through technology education: A research study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(2), 89–100.
Martin, M. (2012). Values in design and technology education: Past, present and future. In T. Ginner, J. Hallström, & M. Hultén (Eds.), Technology education in the 21st century. The PATT 26 conference (pp. 309–315). Stockholm: Linköping University/CETIS/KTH.
McDermott, R. P. (1996). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice - Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, L., & Hayward, R. (2006). New jobs, old occupational stereotypes: Gender and jobs in the new economy. Journal of Education and Work, 19(1), 67–93.
Murphy, P. (2006). Gender and technology. Gender mediation in school knowledge construction. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (pp. 219–237). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Murphy, P. (2007). Gender and pedagogy. In D. Barlex (Ed.), Design and technology: For the next generation (pp. 236–251). Shropshire: Cliffeco Communications.
Niiranen, S. (2016). Increasing girls’ interest in technology education as a way to advance women in technology. Doctoral dissertation. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Niiranen, S., & Hilmola, A. (2016). Female technology education teachers’ experiences of Finnish craft education. Technology and Design Education: An International Journal, 21(2), 41–48.
Niiranen, S., & Niiranen, S. (2015). Women in technology-oriented fields. Australasian Journal of Technology Education, 2.
Paechter, F. (2007). Being boys, being girls: Learning masculinities and femininities. London: Open University Press.
Quaiser-Pohl, C. (2012). Women’s choices in STEM – Statistical data and theoretical approaches explaining the gender gap. In C. Quaiser-Pohl & M. Endepohls-Ulpe (Eds.), Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development (pp. 53–61). Münster: Waxmann.
Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Endepohls-Ulpe, M. (2012). Education, occupational career and family work – Similarities and differences in women’s choices in Europe (Editorial). In C. Quaiser-Pohl & M. Endepohls-Ulpe (Eds.), Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development (pp. 7–13). Münster: Waxmann.
Rasinen, A., Virtanen, S., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., Ikonen, P., Ebach, J., & Stahl-von Zabern, J. (2009). Technology education for children in primary schools in Finland and Germany: Different school systems, similar problems and how to overcome them. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 368–379. doi:10.1007/s10798-009-9097-5.
Ritz, J. M., & Fan, S.-C. (2015). STEM and technology education: International state-of-the-art. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(4), 429–451. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z.
Sander, E. (2012). Biographies of female scientists in Austria: Results of an interview study. In C. Quaiser-Pohl & M. Endepohls-Ulpe (Eds.), Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development (pp. 107–122). Münster: Waxmann.
Snape, P., & Fox-Thurnbull, W. (2013). Perspectives on authenticity: Implementation in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 51–68. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9168-2.
Turja, L., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Chatoney, M. (2009). A conceptual framework for developing the curriculum and delivery of technology education in early childhood. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 353–365. doi:10.1007/s10798-009-9093-9.
van Aalderen-Smeets, S. I., & van der Molen, J. H. (2016). Modeling the relation between students’ implicit beliefs about their abilities and their educational STEM choises. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, Published online: 18 Nov 2016. doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9387-7.
van Tuijl, C., & van der Molen, J. H. (2016). Study choise and career development in STEM fields: An overview and integration of the research. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(2), 159–183. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9308-1.
Virtanen, S., Räikkönen, E., & Ikonen, P. (2015). Gender-based motivational differences in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 25(2), 197–211. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9278-8.
Volk, K. S. (2007). Attitudes. In M. de Vries, R. Custer, J. Dakers, & G. Martin (Eds.), Analyzing best practices in technology education (pp. 191–202). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Niiranen, S. (2017). Gender and Technology Education. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_61-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_61-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education