Abstract
This chapter argues that technology education has a key role in enabling young people to actively participate in a world facing complex sociocultural and environmental challenges and an economy that is shifting from being knowledge driven to being innovation led. The aim of technology education internationally is to develop student technological literacy, and in New Zealand this literacy has been described as becoming increasingly “broad, deep, and critical” in nature as it progresses (Compton and France 2007; Compton and Harwood 2008). Further work in New Zealand to explore the transformatory nature of this literacy, as learning in technology progresses, resulted in three phases being identified as foundational, citizenship, and comprehensive technological literacy (Compton et al. 2011).
The chapter discusses what teachers need to know and do, to support student learning in technology and become more technologically literate, particularly related to foundational and citizenship technological literacy. It also discusses how the relationship between student decision-making and their undertaking of technological practice supports their progression toward a more comprehensive technological literacy. Findings from New Zealand classroom-based research are provided to support these discussions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.
Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.
Beyth-Marom, R., Fischhoff, B., Jacobs-Quadrel, M., & Furby, L. (1991). Teaching decision making to adolescents: A critical review. In J. Baron & R. V. Brown (Eds.), Teaching decision making to adolescents (pp. 19–60). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Biotechnology Learning Hub. (2009). Ethical thinking tool. Retrieved 1 Mar 2011 from http://biotechlearn.org.nz/thinking_tools/ethics_thinking_tool/ethics_thinking_tool#/login
Bohanec, M. (2009). Decision making: A computer-science and information-technology viewpoint. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 7(2), 22–37.
Breukelen, D. H. J., Vries, M. and Schure, F. A., (2016) Concept learning by direct current design challenges in secondary education.
Carruthers, P. (2003). The mind is a system of modules shaped by natural selection. In C. R. Hitchcock (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. New York: Blackwell.
Compton, V. J. (2007). The role of technology education in supporting a democratic literacy. Paper presented at technology education New Zealand, Biannual conference, Auckland 3–5 Oct 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2009, from: http://www.tenz.org.nz/2007/2007-conference-papers.htm
Compton, V. J. (2013). Technological literacy: Implications for teaching and learning – Final report to ministry of education.
Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2010). Technological knowledge and the nature of technology: Implications for teaching and learning – Summary of final report. Retrieved 13 May 2016 from: technology.tki.org.nz/index.php/content/.../TKNOT-Implications.docx
Compton, A., & Compton, V. J. (2011a). Strategies for progressing student understanding of the characteristics of technology. Published in conference proceedings of technology education New Zealand, 8th biennial conference. Dunedin. 26–28 July 2011.
Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2011b). Strategies for progressing student understanding of technological modelling. Published in conference proceedings of technology education New Zealand, 8th biennial conference. Dunedin. 26–28 July 2011.
Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2013a). Teaching technological knowledge: Determining and supporting student learning of the technological concepts. International Journal of Design and Technology Education, 23(3), 637–674.
Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2013b). Teaching the nature of technology: Determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology. International Journal of Design and Technology Education., 23(2), 229–256.
Compton, V. J., & France, B. (2007). Redefining technological literacy in New Zealand: From concepts to curriculum constructs. Proceedings of the Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT 18). International design and technology education conference: Teaching and learning technological literacy in the classroom (pp. 260–272). Glasgow.
Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2001). Developing technological literacy: A framework for technology education in New Zealand. Published in conference proceedings of Technology Education New Zealand, Biannual conference (pp. 39–54). Wellington. 1–3 Oct 2001.
Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2004). Technology education achievement standards: Are they fit for the purpose? Published in peer reviewed conference proceedings from the 3rd biennial international conference on technology education research. Learning for Innovation in Technology Education (Vol. 1, pp. 140–149). Gold Coast: Crowne Plaza Hotel Surfers Paradise. 9–11 Dec 2004.
Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2005). Progression in technology education in New Zealand: Components of practice as a way forward. International Journal of Design and Technology Education., 15(3), 253–287.
Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2008). Discussion document: Design ideas for future technology programmes. Retrieved 10 Jan 2009 from: http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/content/download/482/3705/file/technology-design-ideas.doc
Compton, V. J., Compton, A., & Patterson, M. (2011). Exploring the transformatory potential of technological literacy. Proceedings of the joint Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology international design and technology education conference and Creativity in Primary Technology conference (PATT 25/CRIPT 8). London. 1–5 July 2011.
Elmose, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in a risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 11–34.
Ferrand, F. (2007). Natural decision. In B. Hardy-Vallée (Ed.), Cognitive decision making: Empirical and foundational issues (pp. 1–14). Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle.
Fischhoff, B., Crowell, N. A., & Kipke, M. (1999). Adolescent decision making: Implications for prevention programs. Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED441185).
Galotti, K. M. (2002). Teaching reasoning and decision-making in introductory cognitive science courses. Retrieved 23 Apr 2011 from: http://www.linguistics.pomona.edu/Hewlettcognitivescience/essays/assets/GalottiReasoning.pdf
Greeno, J. (1997). Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 85–126.
Hallstrom, J., & Gyberg, P. (2009). Technology in the rear-view mirror: How to better incorporate the history of technology into technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 3–17.
Hardy-Vallée, B. (2007). Cognitive decision-making: Empirical and foundational issues. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Harman, G. (2009). Practical aspects of theoretical reasoning. Retrieved 23 Dec 2009 from: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:w0VnxNSjylkJ:citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.94.9271%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf+practical+reasoning+pdf&hl=en&gl=nz&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShm1zepQF9w5fFwAnq8k1EwxWVuszsBsM3IdCn0JcGIpp2ATDMRimOggy52OB5VqzKOsTRlTF1q_-Rd6Zxiocoy8qsekB15i6xvURP4b60TwHrYOoRxZ5YoZ4DS7FAK38w0_s0&sig=AHIEtbQLrqDBm71DidM38me2tn92LOx-_w
Harwood, C. D. (2014). Enhancing student decision making in technological practice: A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Education. Palmerston North: Massey University. Retrieved 13 May 2016 from: http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/5494#sthash.jLEZcniI.dpuf
Johnson, S. D. (1997). Learning technological concepts and developing intellectual skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 161–180.
Keirl, S. (2006). Ethical technological literacy as democratic curriculum keystone. Chapter 6. In J. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (pp. 81–102). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). How can decision making be improved? Retrieved 2 Jan 2010, from: http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/08-102.pdf
Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.
OECD. (2011). Fostering innovation to address social challenges. Retrieved 2 Jan 2016 from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/47861327.pdf
OECD. (2012). Innovation for development a discussion of the issues and an overview of work of the OECD directorate for science, technology and industry. Retrieved 2 Jan 2016 from: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/50586251.pdf
OECD. (2015). OECD innovation strategy 2015 an agenda for policy action. Retrieved 2 Jan 2016 from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/OECD-Innovation-Strategy-2015-CMIN2015-7.pdf
Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychology, 35(4), 227–241.
Parkinson, & Hope, G. (2009). Beyond knowing how to make it work: The conceptual foundations of designing. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 49–55.
Railton, P. (1999). Moral explanation and moral objectivity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58(1), 175–182.
Rohaan, E. (2009). Testing teacher knowledge for technology in primary schools. Published doctoral thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.
Rohaan, E., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2010). Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 15–26.
Rowell, P. (2004). Developing technological stance: Children’s learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 45–59.
Skovmose, O. (1998). Linking mathematics education and democracy: Citizenship, mathematical archaelology, mathemacy and deliberative interaction. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 30(6), 195–204.
Thompson, E. (1990). Promoting individuality and originality. In L. Tickle (Ed.), Design and technology in primary classrooms. London: Falmer Press.
de Vries, M. J. (2013). Understanding technology structure and function. In J. Hallstrom & C. Klasander (Eds.), The Ginner handbook of technology education. Some theses about technology, school and society (pp. 156–166). Sweden: Elanders.
Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. In New studies in critical realism and education. Oxfordshire: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Harwood, C., Compton, V.J. (2017). The Importance of the Conceptual in Progressing Technology Teaching and Learning. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_17-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38889-2_17-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38889-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education