Abstract
While the words “utopia” and “anticipation” frequently appear together in discussions of the concepts of utopia and dystopia, little attention to the relationship of Anticipation Studies to utopian studies exists. Moreover, the relevance of literature and the arts to Anticipation Studies seems almost (not quite) invisible. This essay focuses on the structuring of the original utopian narrative, Sir Thomas More’s Utopia (The Utopia of Sir Thomas More. New York: Macmillan [1895 edition] 1516), in order to understand how this seminal text conceptualizes utopia’s relation to past, present, and future. This analysis focuses on the complex framing devices characteristic of utopian narrative, as well as its open-endedness. The embedding of narratives sets up the dynamic movement between past, present, and future – the various forms of temporality – that allows us to clarify the nature of utopian anticipation.
Throughout the chapter, I attempt to connect utopian textual and conceptual theory to specific concepts in the emerging field of Anticipation Studies, with which Utopian Studies, a long-established interdisciplinary field, have not yet engaged. Of particular interest is the notion, promoted by Miguel Abensour, that utopia is always a disruption and thus not an anticipation in any “natural” or logical sense: “what matters is the orientation toward what is different, the wish for the advent of a radical alterity here and now” (Constellations 15(3): 407, 2008). From this premise, we can reintroduce a neglected literary term from science fiction theorist, Darko Suvin: the novum. The eruption of a future from a point of radical alterity – an ontological accident – opens up radical implication for the nature of utopian anticipation and futurity.
Finally the essay suggests that Robert Poli’s and Robert Rosen’s description of an anticipatory system as comprising “the predictive model of itself” within the genre’s formal characteristics is in fact present in the structure of the utopian narratives: that is, that the persistence of utopia – as a literary genre and as a political concept – inheres in the narratological structuring of the possibility of another story and another listener. Utopian narrative thus ultimately anticipates not only temporal relationality, but an ethical relation between the outside narrator, the utopian traveler/narrator, and the reader. It anticipates another story.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abensour, M. (2008). Persistent Utopia. Constellations, 15(3), 406–421.
Atwood, M. (1985). The handmaid’s tale. New York: Anchor Books.
Atwood, M. (2003). Oryx and crake. New York: Anchor Books.
Barthes, R. (2011) Mythologies (trans: Howard, R. & Lavers, A.). New York: Hill and Wang.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bloch, E. (1986 [1959]). The principle of hope (Das Prinzip Hoffnung). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Braidotti, R. (1994). Nomadic subjects: embodiment and sexual difference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bulwer-Lytton, E. (1871). The coming race: Or, the new Utopia (2017th ed.). New York: Forgotten Books.
Crosthwaite, P. (2010). Anticipations of the accident: Modernist fiction and systemic risk. Textual Practice, 24(2), 331–352.
Currie, M. (2011). Postmodern narrative theory (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Davis, L. (2001). Isaiah Berlin, William Morris, and the politics of utopia. In B. Goodwin (Ed.), The philosophy of Utopia. London: Frank Cass.
Derrida, J. (1973). Speech and phenomena; and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs (trans: Allison, D.). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Derrida, J. (1976). Of Grammatology (trans: Spivak, G. C.). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Gibson, A. (1996). Towards a postmodern theory of narrative. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gilman, C. P. (1915). In B. Solomon (Ed.), Herland and selected Stories. New York: Signet Classics.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan_MeetsOncoMouse: Feminist and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Hartsock, N. (1999). The feminist standpoint revisited & other essays. New York: Basic Books.
Jameson, F. (1994). The seeds of time: The Wellek library lectures at the University of California, Irvine. New York: Columbia University Press.
Jameson, F. (2004). The politics of utopia. New Left Review, 25, 35–54.
Largier, N. (2010). The plasticity of the soul: Mystical darkness, touch, and aesthetic experience. Modern Language Notes, 125(3), 536–551.
Lawlor, L.. (2016). Jacques Derrida. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/derrida
Levitas, R. (1990). The concept of utopia. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Malabou, C. (2008). What shall we do with our brain? New York: Fordham University Press.
Marin, L. (1993). Frontiers of utopia: Past and present. Critical Inquiry, 19, 397–420.
More, S. T. (1516). The utopia of Sir Thomas more (1895th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
More, S. T. (1991). Utopia. New York: Norton Critical Editions.
Morris, W. (1890). News from Nowhere.The Gutenberg Project E-Book. http://www.sfu.ca/~poitras/Morris_News-from=Nowhere
Nadin, M. (2010). Anticipation and dynamics: Rosen’s anticipation in the perspective of time. International Journal of General Systems, 39, 3–33.
Nadir, C. (2010). Utopian studies, environmental literature, and the legacy of an idea: Educating desire in Miguel Abensour and Ursula K. Le Guin. Utopian Studies, 21(1), 24–56.
Piercy, M. (1985). Women on the edge of time. New York: Fawcett Books.
Poli, R. (2010a). The many aspects of anticipation. Foresight, 12(3), 7–17.
Poli, R. (2010b). An introduction to the ontology of anticipation. Futures, 42, 769–776.
Popper, K. (1990). A World of propensities. London: Thoemmes.
Rabinovich, S. (2005). Utopia: Reading and redemption. Diogenes, 1(209), 109–116.
Rosen, R. (1985). Anticipatory systems. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Rouse, J. (2009). Standpoint theories reconsidered. Hypatia, 24(4), 200–209.
Scognamiglio, C. (2010). Anticipation and future vision in Nicolai Hartmann’s ontology. Foresight, 12(3), 50–58.
Suvin, D. (1979). Metamorphoses of science fiction: On the poetics and history of a literary genre. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Swift, J. (1726). Gulliver’s travels. New York: Penguin Classics.
Trend, D. (2013). Worlding: Identity, media, and imagination in a digital age. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
Vieira, F. (2010). The concept of utopia. In G. Claeys (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to utopian literature (pp. 3–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wagner-Lawlor, J. (2013). Postmodern utopias and feminist fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1985). In D. W. Sherburne & D. R. Griffin (Eds.), Process and reality: An essay in cosmology (Corrected ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (2003). The analysis of process. In H. Maassen (Ed.), European studies in process thought (Vol. 1). Leuven: European Society for Process Thought.
Wilde, O. (1895). The soul of man under socialism. London: Penguin Classics.
Winterson, J. (1997). Art objects essays on ecstasy and effrontery. New York: Vintage.
Winterson, J. (2009). The stone Gods. New York: Mariner Books.
Wood, D., & Bernasconi, R. (Eds.). (1988). Derrida and différance. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wagner-Lawlor, J.A. (2017). Anticipating Utopia: Utopian Narrative and an Ontology of Representation. In: Poli, R. (eds) Handbook of Anticipation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_63-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31737-3_63-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31737-3
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities