Abstract
Plants are the most appropriate source of variety of compounds that are useful to mankind as food, fiber, medicines, natural products, industrial raw material, etc. A large number of metabolites (primary and secondary) have been utilized by mankind since many years ago. However, there are certain limitations like overharvesting the natural plant, low amount of metabolite/compound, etc., which have been associated with the availability of natural products/compounds. This common problem has become major hurdles for researchers these days. To address such problems, scientists have moved toward more efficient technique like genetic transformation methods. In today’s era, Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation (ATMT) strategies have shown to be an efficient and most sophisticated technique to understand about modifications, cloning, and diversification in biosynthetic pathways in planta. The existing knowledge and many successful achievements in biotechnology sector have facilitated the development of new methods like metabolic engineering to divert the target metabolic flux in transgenic plants.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
For millennia, significant progress has been made to use plant as an ultimate source of natural products. In highlighting strides to reengineer plant’s genome over the past 20 years, genetic manipulation has shown much potential to benefit economies of scale in plant biotechnology sector. Metabolic/pathway engineering is basically an art to reengineer the already existing route in order to retrieve the target flux in enhanced concentration, and at times, accumulation of novel compounds has been reported so far. Plants in their native state comprise a phenomenal feat of metabolic cascades and innumerable diversion of biochemical pathways operated inside them. Although the conventional breeding programs have been proved fruitful that empower crop varieties to withstand biotic and abiotic stresses and to enhance the metabolite content, these breeding strategies are time consuming and laborious. However, metabolic engineering has significantly contributed many advances particularly in genetics/crop physiology and genomics by providing opportunities to alleviate the effect of these stresses and easily combat with factors involved in metabolism. Recent scientific discoveries in the area of ME have opened up new avenues which provide innumerable potential for plant improvement. Advancements in the ME leading to identification, annotation, and characterization of putative genes/enzymes in relation to particular aspect like primary or secondary metabolism have made this technology highly appreciable and feasible as well.
Strategies for diverting the metabolic flux include the engineering of an individual step in a particular pathway in order to enhance/reduce the content of target metabolite/product. In addition, to redirect the flux toward a more predictable aspect, sometimes suppression/arrest/blocking of competitive pathway has been also proved as an exciting tool. Moreover, reducing metabolic flux through competitive pathways overcome the rate-limiting steps in particular biosynthetic routes along with reduction in catabolic reactions, and the overexpression of regulatory genes also proved beneficial and key aspects of genetic engineering [1]. Recently, approaches have been applied to focus multiple genes/enzymatic steps in a particular pathway to control metabolite production. The parameters involved various strategies like the overexpression of enzymes and downregulation of consecutive genes/enzymes in a pathway while terminating those which are involved in competing pathways. This might also involve the various regulation transcription factors (TF) to recognize the multilocus genes which can control over a single and more consecutive pathways operating in planta. Some major technical limits, in context to how many numbers of genes can be transferred to a host plant, and new transformation techniques have been developed to transform a plant with multiple transgenes at a time and to express these transgenes in a coordinated manner [2]. The present scenario of paradigm in the biological science of complex cascades in plant system has diverted the current shift toward better, efficient transformation methods such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation systems (ATMT). The ATMT approach, an efficient method through which construct could be made per se, is used to investigate the type and the localization pattern (subcellular, intracellular) of gene of interest. Based on the studies, we here review the potential of metabolic engineering via Agrobacterium tumefaciens in the biosynthesis of novel compounds and discuss the prospects for establishing the technology to induce tailor-made synthesis of target metabolic flux. The above described aspects of genetic engineering have been made possible with approaches like biolistics, particle bombardment, but there are lacunas that still exist. The ATMT approach is highly feasible and efficient for these types of manipulation applied in planta.
2 Transformation Methods and Strategies
Recent progress has been made over last few years, which have led to the development of an efficient strategy that can be easily accessible with a broad range of agronomically important crops. There are approaches like biolistics (particle bombardment), electroporation, which considerably makes it easy to obtain transient expression at high levels (Table 1). The strategies have been used to check the efficiency of different gene constructs prior to transformation. While transient expression can be used to locate the presence of gene or study metabolic networks in plant and cell tissue culture, it has been determined that the similar genes can also act differently in stable as well as in transiently transformed plants [3]. Transient expression is also used for analyzing the tissue-specific expression of target transgenes.
3 Agrobacterium tumefaciens: A Soil-Based Bioengineer in the Era of Advanced Biotechnology
Agrobacterium tumefaciens (scientifically named as Rhizobium radiobacter ), a gram-negative, rod-shaped soil bacterium from family Rhizobiaceae, is responsible for crown gall disease in over 140 plus species of eudicots, dicotyledons, gymnosperms, and some monocots [4]. During the last years, the crown gall disease was acting as one of the major hurdle in horticultural biosector, as this disease leads to havoc loss in majority of economically important horticultural crops [5] like in grape [6], apple [7], cherry [8], and many more. However, problems like the mode of propagation through grafting of stems and the woody nature of these crops have been acted to be a common issue. The wounds on grafted tissue may serve as an infection channel and the crown gall disease takes place. In 1941 White and Braun observed that only a minute exposure of A. tumefaciens to wounded tissue may transform it permanently [9]. Soon after, tumorigenicity was proposed to be transferred through A. tumefaciens to host tissue [10, 11]. Further, during 1974, it was identified that the capacity to induce crown gall disease is inherently carried by Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium [12, 13]. However, in particular, the molecular characterization techniques like southern hybridization has led to the discovery that Ti plasmid transferred its DNA into the host plant cell and resulted in the origin of T-DNA from A. tumefaciens to the host plant cell [14–16]. The Ti plasmid consists of T-DNA which delimits by 25 bp direct repeats sequences a.k.a. T-DNA border sequences. This T-DNA from Ti plasmid gets transferred and integrated in the host plant where it encodes two enzymes, and results into the production of a massive amount of auxin and cytokinin lead to the uncontrolled cell proliferation called crown gall disease. In addition, the production of some low-molecular-weight compounds like amino acid and opines (sugar phosphate derivatives) could be metabolized specifically depending upon the Agrobacterium strain. Thus, A. tumefaciens strain is solely responsible for the production of different types of opines and ultimately creating an ecological niche which suits to a particular strain of A. tumefaciens [17, 18]. The formation of tumor in the host plant’s cell is the resultant of T-DNA integration, and this factor has become an intrinsic interest of researchers/scientists for strategic engineering of the plant’s genome. The same property of T-DNA has been used widely nowadays to insert a foreign gene of interest for target manipulation without showing any adverse effect in the host plant. The elucidation of the fact that a wild/normal type of T-DNA region can be easily replaced by desired sequence has made A. tumefaciens stand out of the queue of other delivery systems. Furthermore, the remarkable feature of stable integration of T-DNA inside the host plant cell has inspired the promise that A. tumefaciens may utilize as gene vector (either in homologous /heterologous system) in order to deliver target DNA sequence in the host plant cell.
In the early of 1980s, it was demonstrated that A. tumefaciens can be used as an efficient gene delivery system to produce a transgenic plant owing desired characteristics [19]. In addition, the transgenic plants have the ability to transmit the disarmed Ti plasmid to their progeny during the course of segregation, so less chances of a loss of desired gene. Apart from such attractive possibilities, the use of an antibiotic selection strategy makes the system efficient for the accurate selection of probable transgenic plants [20]. The eventual progress of using A. tumefaciens as a gene delivery vector for crop improvement has made it possible to use efficiently in the plant biotechnology sector, and the future began to look bright. During the 1990s, a monocot species, maize, was successfully transformed by A. tumefaciens [21]. In today’s era, successful attempts have been made to transform horticultural cultivated flora and agronomically important species [17]. Recently, important plant species like soybean, canola, cotton, corn, potatoes, etc. have been transformed by A. tumefaciens, and improved varieties were released and successfully grown all over the world [22]. At present, apart from plant species, other organisms such as fungi, yeast, and mammalian cells were shown to be susceptible to ATMT [23]. However, nowadays the shift of plant molecular biology has been shifted toward more advanced experimentation which includes the elucidation of various aspects of molecular and biochemical mechanism/changes of T-DNA complex targeting the plant nucleus. Hence, based on the above presumed facts and present scenario, on how efficiently the A. tumefaciens could be used for genetic and metabolic manipulations, it can be considered as a bioengineer in advanced biotechnology.
4 An Overview on Expression of Transgene
For the perfect modification of target metabolite profile in respect to the utility of the particular plant, the expression of the gene of target enzymes or proteins has to be fine-tuned in a justified manner. For an appropriate expression of transgene in the host plant, the transcription factors need to be well identified. In context to the location and expression of metabolite, the role of promoters has been known to contribute significantly in engineering the specific host for a particular target. High level of transient expression can be obtained, but to get relatively stable transformed plants is not an easy task. Therefore, plant-specific promoters could be used to achieve a high-level as well as stable expression too. Promoters in metabolic engineering can be divided in three categories: constitutive promoters, organ-specific promoters, and inducible promoters.
The most commonly used constitutive promoter in plant genetic engineering is CaMV 35S promoter (cauliflower mosaic virus 35S) [24, 25]. In plant vectors the CaMV 35S promoter has been used extensively and is known to consist of more than one third of the full length sequence [26]. This promoter is of viral origin and has been thoroughly characterized in metabolic engineering of cell cultures and is able to drive a high level of transgene expression in plant tissues [27, 28]. It has been interpreted that partial duplication from −343 to −90 base pair region of promoter can amplify the expression of the target gene up to tenfold [29]. As, in context to the fact that, CaMV 35S is of viral origin so, could be able to drive a high level of transgene expression in planta. However, in contrary, sometimes it can also be resulted into deleterious effects like co-suppression of gene which ultimately lead to gene silencing [30].
On the basis on the type of expression, there are various types of promoters used to target the expression of the gene in a specific manner like organ/tissue/developmental stage. These kinds of tissue-/organ-specific promoters have been characterized at large level in plant engineering system. The respective application of these types of promoters will not hamper the normal plant growth and development. However, at times, it can also lead to the synthesis of desired or value-added novel compounds. The use of the inducible promoter’s strategy [31] is highly efficient in order to examine the resultant effect of expression of the transgene in complex biosynthetic routes. For example, pristinamycin is a polyketide antibiotic which is not found in plants normally used to remove the bacterial infection/contamination in the bioengineering of cell cultures.
Likewise, safeners are known as “herbicide antidotes” and the exposure to the safener would lead to the activation of In 2–2 promoter in shoot and root tissues. Safener can be used in the treatment of seed to control the weeds during the planting of material. The use of safener would also be useful in seed bioengineering or in case the expression of transgene is required for a small period of time after germination. In addition, by selecting an appropriate promoter, it could be possible to redirect the transgene expression toward an appropriate need [32] (Table 2).
5 Engineering Primary Metabolism Using ATMT
5.1 Modulation in Primary Metabolites and Aspect of Engineering In Planta
The importance of modulating the primary metabolic pathway is a worthy strategy to provide strength at innate immunity level in planta to cope up with certain environmental imbalances and pathogen attack. Basically, the plants depend upon the innate immunity to protect themselves from pathogen attack. This innate immunity depends upon the induced defense responses [51]. The primary metabolic pathway undoubtedly plays an undeniable role in providing the cellular energy requirements which in turn help in strengthen the defense system in plants [52, 53]. The injury from ecological stress like pathogen attack, freezing, drought, and flooding often seems to be linked with the overproduction of free oxygen radicals. Superoxide dismutases (SODs) are a class of metalloproteins known to be actively involved in the detoxification of these free oxygen radicals, by breaking down into hydrogen peroxide and molecular oxygen. An overexpression of SODs was done in alfalfa to combat over winter stress [54]. Likewise, alfalfa is also found to be sensitive to aluminum (Al) toxicity, which leads into small roots and low yield. A multipurpose gene named malate dehydrogenase was incorporated into Alfalfa which resulted into the production of acetate, succinate, citrate, oxalate, and malate and with a concomitant increase in Al tolerance [55].
Although interminable progress has been made to enlighten the complex cascade steps underlying the developmental defense pathways, to date very little knowledge has been generated about the actual role and involvement of primary pathways in regulating the plant defense mechanisms. In addition, the linked pathways provide a connecting phase between secondary and primary metabolism as illustrated in Fig. 1. However, it has been well documented that the role of primary metabolism is to provide the elementary compounds and precursors for secondary metabolism routes. Based on the convincing experimental evidences only, we have chosen the modulated/engineered pathway studies involving essential primary metabolites like amino acid, carbohydrates, etc.
5.1.1 Essential Amino Acid Metabolism
Engineering the amino acid production pathway to enhance the accumulation of important amino acids like methionine, lysine, threonine, and tryptophan in fruits, food, and crops has been accomplished successfully [56]. Proline has been considered as osmotic protectant and plays a major role in both biotic and abiotic stresses in plants, so engineering the proline pathway has provided a way to cope up with these stresses in planta [57]. Transgenic rice with enhanced lysine content was developed by overexpression of seed stored in the β-phaseolin gene from Phaseolus vulgaris [58]. Another example includes the production of essential amino acid AmA1 (Amaranth Albumin 1) from Amaranthus hypochondriacus which leads to the increase in 2.5–4-fold higher content of methionine, tyrosine, and lysine transgenic potatoes [59].
In contrast, the lysine content in Arabidopsis was either increased by five times through knockout expression of lysine catabolism pathway or twelve times by modulation of bacterial feedback-insensitive dihydrodipicolinate synthase (DHPS) transgene [60].
5.1.2 Carbohydrate Metabolism
In plant kingdom, carbohydrate metabolism involves reversible sequential conversion of sugars into starch and cellulose as photosynthetic products. Starch is an example of stored carbohydrate which accumulates stably in roots, tubers, and seeds while transiently in aerial part like leaves. In the last few years, attention has been given to engineer the starch content and to modify the properties by coordinating relative proportion of amylose and amylopectin content. ME has been used in an attempt to produce novel starch using a heterologous expression of bacterial enzymes by changing the frequency and number of branching chains [61]. Engineering primary metabolite includes enhancing the adenylate pool to increase starch content along with the increase in yield of tubers in potato [62] and overexpression of potato sucrose transporter to enhance the sugar uptake in transgenic pea seeds [63]. Similar experiments have been carried out in rice and wheat species in order to modify the starch content along with seed biomass. A gene from maize was introduced for modification of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (shrunken 2) which resulted in the production of 20% and 40% of higher seed biomass, respectively, than control plants [64, 65]. More recently, applying an antisense waxy (Wx) gene under Wx promoter was expressed in transgenic rice which led to production of low-level amylose in rice grain [66], and in contrast, applying the same approach to isoamylase-encoding gene has led to the increase in content of amylopectin in rice grain [67]. Strategies have been applied in sequential coordination of the enzymes/genes involved in the starch synthesis, along within the branches/skeleton in monomer unit. This stepwise engineering has successfully led to the production of high-amylopectin and high-amylose starch contents in transgenic potatoes [68]. A novel method for engineering of starch content has been explored, in which starch-binding domains were used to target recombinant enzymes during starch metabolism [69].
Apart from the engineering of starch, manipulations in cellulose biosynthetic pathway have been done. The cellulose is an essential source of fiber and pulp and will provide a way for value addition in industries. However, in addition, it serves as precursors for many commercially exploited products/polymers. Although the biosynthetic pathway for cellulose has not been fully understood to date, various enzymes/gene have been identified and characterized like Korrigan cellulases, sucrose synthase, etc. These studies led to the determination of consecutive aspects of metabolically progressive underlying mechanism operating in planta. Furthermore, the suppression of sucrose synthase belonging to Ces-A family of cellulose synthases has shown the simultaneous inhibition in the accumulation of fiber in transgenic cotton [70]. However, in Arabidopsis, dominant negative experiments and antisense approach including Ces-A genes have revealed the role of Ces-A proteins in the formation of primary and secondary cell wall [71, 72].
6 Engineering Secondary Metabolism Using ATMT
6.1 Modulation in Secondary Metabolites and Aspects of Engineering In Planta
Secondary metabolites are the outcome/products/compounds derived from secondary metabolism operated in plants. These metabolites are bioactive in nature and known to be actively involved in defense mechanism to overcome the fluctuations in the ecological environment and to protect itself from the pathogen attack. These compounds are produced in minute quantity/as per requirement depending upon the type of pathogen attack. However, being able to cope up with the disturbing ecological parameters and pathogen attack, these compounds are of intrinsic interest of scientists/researchers.
Plant secondary metabolites are categorized into three major groups: terpenes, phenolics, and nitrogen-containing compounds. In the modern era, scientists have often started to engineer the secondary metabolism for their intrinsic interests. Likewise, efforts have been made in engineering the pathways (terpenes, phenolics, and alkaloids) which proved out to be very beneficial for diverting the target metabolite flux as illustrated in Table 3.
6.1.1 Terpenes
The terpenoids family constitutes the major class of secondary metabolites. The family consists of more than 40,000 natural compounds , constituting both primary as well as secondary metabolites. Many efforts have been made to engineer the terpenoid metabolic pathway in planta. Many of the primary metabolite syntheses via terpenoid pathway consist of photosynthesis pigments, plant-derived phytohormones, and ubiquinones which are essential for respiration [73] (Fig. 1). Attempts have been made to produce monoterpenes in transgenic plants; this strategy is easier than to modify the terpenoids containing complexed longer chains [73]. To date, progress have been made to identify the formation, localization, stabilization, and subcellular compartmentalization of the target products as the plant system is highly complexed and consists of specialized structures for proper storage and transportation of volatile and hydrophobic compounds. The plant species which do not contain these specialized secretory structures made it difficult to introduce new pathways [74]. The strategy of overexpression of pathway enzyme in plant species proved to be fruitful in enhancing the desired substrate. Wu and coworkers provided opportunity to encourage the production of pharmaceutically or industrially relevant plants for commercialization at large scale [75, 76].
The biosynthetic pathway is started from acetyl-CoA or glycolytic intermediates. These are synthesized by the fusion of five-carbon isoprene units. Terpenes are produced by condensation of five-carbon elements that may have branched carbon skeleton of isopentane units. The terpenes are also known as isoprene units; at high temperature terpenes may decompose to give isoprene unit. Therefore, the terpenoid group is sometimes called as isoprenoids . The terpene group is categorized on the basis of number of five-carbon units, like monoterpenes (10-C), sesquiterpene (15-C), and diterpenes (20-C). In addition, triterpenes with 30 carbons, tetraterpenes with 40 carbons, and polyterpenoids with [C5]n carbons (where n > 8) have also been reported. There are two terpene biosynthetic pathways available in planta, i.e., mevalonic acid pathway , in which three molecules of acetyl-coA are condensed in stepwise manner to yield mevalonic acid which is a 6-C compound (the mevalonic acid is then pyrophosphorylated, decarboxylated, and followed by dehydration to produce isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP2)), and the MVA pathway which is known to yield triterpenes and sesquiterpenes which occur in the endoplasmic reticulum [73]. IPP is also discovered to be involved in the formation of intermediates in the carbon reduction cycle of photosynthesis through channeling individual set of chemical reactions known as methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway which occur in the chloroplast/plastid [77, 78]. Larger units are formed via condensation of different sets of carbon ring like 10-carbon compound geranyl diphosphate (GPP), then 15-carbon compound farnesyl diphosphate (FPP), then 20-carbon compound geranylgeranyl diphosphate (GGPP), and finally 30-C compound triterpenes and the 40-C compound tetraterpenes, carotenoids [73]. These two leading pathways have been in focus for metabolic engineering so far [79].
To date, examples of metabolic engineering of monoterpenoid are like (S)-limonene synthase gene from Clarkia breweri in petunia resulting in the formation of linalool, which showed repulsion to aphids [80]. So far, the same gene under the control of a fruit-specific promoter encourages the accumulation of linalool in fruits of tomato [81]. Transgenic tomatoes expressing phytoene synthase resulted in the fourfold increment in the production of carotenoid than normal plants. Although, in the case of transgenic tomato expressing phytoene desaturase, no enhancement was observed in the overall carotenoid content, the content of β-carotenoid was threefold higher than the normal plants [82].
Attention has been given to carotenoid biosynthetic pathway, which led to the synthesis of pigments which takes part in photo protection system and light harvesting complex. The carotenoid pathway is started with the coupling reaction of two geranyl phosphate molecules resulted in the production of geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP). This GGPP get converted into phytoene in the presence of phytoene synthase enzyme and eventually into Z-carotene in the presence of phytoene desaturase enzyme in a stepwise manner to yield lycopene and finally either into β-carotene (provitamin A) in the presence of β-cyclase enzyme or δ-carotene and then to α-carotene by enzymes ε-cyclase and β-cyclase, respectively [83]. Golden rice is supposed to be the best example which consists of two foreign genes: a bacterial phytoene desaturase and the daffodil phytoene synthase [84]. In addition, the overexpression of mono-/sequiterpene synthase FaNES1 from strawberry in Arabidopsis resulted in the production of nerolidol (CIS) derivatives named 4,8-dimethyl-1,3(E), 7-nonatriene [85].
Consistent with the notion, secondary metabolites, synthesis via terpenoid pathway such as monoterpene (C10), sesquiterpene (C15), diterpene (C20), and triterpene (C30), are actively involved in the ecological and physiological advantage to plants (Fig. 2). Basically, terpenes provide resistance to pathogen-related infection and are known to have antimicrobial, antifungal, and insecticidal properties. Terpenes are also having the ability to attract pollinators, repel pests, etc. In addition, apart from the use of terpenoids in flavor, fragrance, and medicines, they also contribute to agricultural sector. The benefit in manipulation in the inherent characteristic of plant in improvement of aromas and fragrance in horticultural sector and as a beneficial source of cosmetics/pharmaceutical has led the researcher to invest their time to engineer the terpenoid pathway [73]. The strategies for manipulation of terpenoid pathway have been reviewed by many workers [73, 74]. Studies like heterologous expression of genes were also done in order to upregulate/overexpress the desired gene. Likewise, a heterologous expression in tomato results in the reduction of a monoterpenoid which promotes the biosynthesis of undesirable flavor and color in mint species [74] and enhanced the production of aroma in ripening fruit [81]. The manipulation of ketocarotenoid biosynthetic pathway in medicinally important plants like tobacco and tomato species through the heterologous expression of bacterial gene also resulted in beneficial outcomes [86]. For example, tomatoes with β-carotene were further co-transformed with hydroxylase gene and β-carotene ketolase gene [86]. In addition, a crtW gene from bacteria was also introduced in tomato and tobacco leaves, and similarly, ketocarotenoid biosynthetic pathway was observed to be operated in leaves and nectary tissues of tobacco, respectively [86].
Metabolic engineering is not only meant to overexpress/downregulate the particular compound, but it could also provide a platform to enhance the yield of desired product up to various folds. Successful achievements regarding ME were discussed in Table 3. Pharmaceutically important terpenoids like diuretic glycyrrhizin, artemisinin (antimalarial drug from Artemisia), taxol (anticancerous; from Taxus species), and perilla alcohol have been isolated from plants. Although various bioactive compounds were derived from endangered species belonging to a threatened environment [76], the synthesis of these compounds by chemical methods is inefficient and also prohibitively costly [75]. Wu and workers have evaluated various factors that required for production of high amount of terpenoids in Nicotiana and were able to identify the various strategies for improving the yield up to 1000-fold [75]. Recently, Niu and coworkers have characterized PnFPS, PnSS, PnSE1, PnSE2, and PnDS genes, which are found to be responsible for the accumulation of triterpene saponins in Panax notoginseng [87]. However, it is noteworthy that the overexpression of squalene synthase (SS) in the same species leads to the production of ginsenosides [88]. Experiments have been set to manipulate the terpene pathway as a wish that the production of resultant/desired/novel product could be achieved via manipulation/engineering of the terpene synthase genes [89].
6.1.2 Alkaloids/Nitrogen-Containing Compounds
Alkaloid is one of the largest groups consisting of more than 12,000 low-molecular-weight compounds [123]. The nitrogen atom present in these compounds is a part of heterocyclic ring that consist of both nitrogen and carbon atom, which does not have nitrogen in peptide or amide group [124]. Alkaloids are derived from common amino acids, in particular tyrosine, lysine, and tryptophan, while some alkaloids are derived from ornithine, an intermediate in arginine biosynthesis also. Alkaloids are known for their striking pharmacological activities on vertebrate animals. The group consists of biogenically unrelated and structurally diverse molecules. Alkaloids which consist of similar structured compounds are the derivative of related biosynthetic pathways; however, many alkaloids are thought to be evolved from unique biosynthetic origins [125]. The substrate starting compound decides the type of structural class to which the alkaloid belongs [125]. Amino acids act as the starting precursor molecule for some alkaloid production; however, few are derived from purine derivatives also. Approximately 12,000 known alkaloids are known to have potent biological activities and can be exploited at commercial levels like stimulants, pharmaceuticals , poisons, and narcotics. The alkaloids are majorly known for their role in plant pathogen interaction , as they provide defense mechanism enabling the plants to cope with adverse ecological conditions by binding the cellular targets in antagonistic organism [126, 127]. Emphasis has been given to manipulate caffeine biosynthetic pathway in such a way that three N-methyltransferase genes were overexpressed, and the enhancement in caffeine content led to the increased tolerance from pests in tobacco plant [128, 129]. Additionally, in Nicotiana, the overexpression of methyltransferase genes from coffee results in 0.2–5 μg of caffeine/g fresh weight of leaf sample [129]. The various biosynthetic pathways/regulatory enzymes/genes involved in the production of alkaloid have been reviewed by Hashimoto and Yamada [130]. Genetic manipulations and characterization involving overexpression/suppression have been done with major emphasis on the key regulatory genes like PMT, ADC, and ODC which are involved in nicotine biosynthetic pathways [131, 132]. An antisense downregulation of berberine bridge enzyme in poppy leads to the reduction of benzophenanthridine alkaloids with concomitant increase in several amino acids [133]. In addition, the production of pharmaceutical important compounds derived from indole alkaloid biosynthetic pathway in Catharanthus roseus has always been in focus to overexpress the compounds (vinblastine and vincristine) having anticancer properties and may be applied as a new approach for manufacturing drugs [134]. Despite having various chemical diversities and metabolic complexities in alkaloid biosynthesis, efforts have been made which significantly contribute advancement in revealing the role and importance of alkaloid compounds. Table 3 represents some of the examples of significant metabolic manipulations in alkaloids biosynthetic pathway via ATMT approach.
6.1.3 Phenolics Compound
Large varieties of secondary products are produced in plants that consist of a phenol group. The phenolic compound consists of hydroxyl group as a functional aromatic ring. The group is chemically heterogeneous consisting of approximately 10,000 individual compounds. Phenolics are the derivatives of phenylpropanoid pathway , shikimate pathway , and pentose phosphate pathway via a phenylalanine as a precursor compound [135, 136]. This is an essential pathway in plants which provides the majority of carbon flux and the plant obtained approximately 20% of the total metabolites through phenylpropanoid pathway [137]. The pathway yields majority of product which includes flavonoids, condensed tannins, anthocyanin, lignins, lignans, and other miscellaneous phenolics. The shikimic acid pathway is responsible for the conversion of simple carbohydrate precursors to aromatic amino acids; these precursors are derived from the pentose phosphate and glycolysis pathway [138]. The majority of secondary phenolic metabolites in plants are derived by the enzyme phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) which converts the phenylalanine to yield trans-cinnamic acid via the elimination of an ammonia molecule. PAL is perhaps the key enzyme present at a branch point between primary and secondary metabolism and yields majority of plant secondary metabolites. Flavonoids are compounds originated from phenylalanine and known to share a common pathway with lignan and lignin. 4-coumaroyl-Co-A is the first precursor for flavonoid biosynthesis which gets converted into chalcone in the presence of chalcone synthase enzyme. The stepwise conversions lead to the production of a variety of compounds which provide pigments like anthocyanin, phytoalexins (defense compounds), and many regulatory compounds [139]. During the early 1990s, the pathway has been focused for metabolic engineering to transfer multigene to target plants. Flavonoids are phenolic compounds with high antioxidant activity and therefore optioned as a favorite target for metabolic engineering. Manipulations like stacking of anthocyanidin synthase and dihydroflavonol 4-reductase transgenes in Forsythia by a series of sequential transformation events have been targeted to utilize the idea of sequential manipulation in planta [140].
Recently, strategies were applied to enhance the flower pigments that have contributed successfully to metabolic engineering [141]. In addition, nowadays, overexpression strategy has led to significant results like by overexpressing chalcone isomerase gene from Petunia which resulted in 20-fold increase in the flavonoid level in tomato paste and 80-fold increase in the flavonoid content in the tomato peel [142]. The flavonol synthase and chalcone synthase
Genes were also observed to significantly upregulate the flavonol biosynthesis in tomato fruits [143]. Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato) with a number of nutritional utilities (like flavonoid content , carotenoid content, ascorbic acid, anthocyanin pigments, etc.) has always been a favorite species for researchers/scientists to engineer these many qualities into quantities through ATMT approach. Some of the significant results were shown in Table 4.
6.1.4 Lignins
Like flavonoids, lignins are the derivatives of phenylalanine and have been classified as phenylpropenes. Lignins are highly complexed polymers which consist of ferulic acid, caffeic acid, and sinapic acid monomers joined to each other. Lignin is an essential component of the cell wall which provides rigidity to the plant architecture. Recently, ME have illustrated the utilization of multiple gene transfer in tree species to modify the lignin content and architecture of the desired plant [176]. Similarly, suppression/downregulation of multiple genes involved in the lignin biosynthetic pathway in tobacco leads to low lignin content without much change in the morphology of the transgenic plants [177, 178]. The transfer of tobacco LIM regulatory protein which is involved in lignification pathway and controls various enzymatic reactions in plant has also been reported [179]. In addition, two Myb-like transcription factors derived from Eucalyptus gunnii were expressed in xylem and determined the action sites of cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) and hydroxycinnamoyl-CoA reductase (CCR) genes that are known to encode stepwise enzymatic reactions essential for the synthesis of p-coumaryl alcohol [180]. ME regarding lignin content in plants was beautifully reviewed by Boudet et al., Anterola and Lewis, and Boerjan et al. [180–182]. Moreover, Bell-Lelong et al. have observed that Arabidopsis C4H, a lignin-associated promoter, was much efficient than general promoter like CaMV35S [183]. However, using lignin-specific promoter could prove more effective for manipulations or engineering purposes.
7 Conclusions
In today’s era, ME strategies have been made focus to coordinate between a multipoint or multilocus gene to control the metabolic flux through cascading secondary metabolite pathways . The expression of target gene/loci and its localization is now starting to supersede using the specific promoters in aspect of particular compound. As discussed above, various points in a given biosynthetic pathway could be controlled either by using antisense or overexpressing genes/enzymes or via application of the transcriptional regulators to overrule the negative role of endogenous genes /enzymes. Recently, the era has moved forward in the area of ME by using various advanced approaches like proteomics, genomics, and metabolomics in order to expand the knowledge of pathways and routes in planta. The production of Golden rice has changed the global view and led the researchers/scientists to think and focus on using the Agrobacterium as a natural genetic manipulator so far. Hence, using ATMT strategy can help in multilocus genetic manipulation and remodeling the genome of target plants.
Abbreviations
- ATMT:
-
A. tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation
- DW:
-
Dry weight
- MAPs:
-
Medicinal and Aromatic Plants
- ME:
-
Metabolic engineering
- PAL:
-
Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase
- T-DNA:
-
Transfer DNA
References
Verpoorte R, van der Heijden R, Memelink J (2000) Engineering the plant cell factory for secondary metabolite production. Transgenic Res 9:323–343
Naqvi S, Farre G, Sanahuja G, Capell T, Zhu C, Christou P (2009) When more is better: multigene engineering in plants. Trends Plant Sci 15(1):48–55
Ingelbrecht IL, Herman LM, Deckeyser RA, Van Montagu MC, Depicker AG (1989) Different 3′ end regions strongly influence the level of gene expression in plant cells. Plant Cell 1:671–680
De Cleene M, De Ley J (1976) The host range of crown gall. Bot Rev 42:389–466
Kennedy BW (1980) Estimates of U.S. crop losses to prokaryote plant pathogens. Plant Dis 64:674–676
Schroth MN, Mc-cain AH, Foott JH, Huisman OC (1988) Reduction in yield and vigor of grapevine caused by crown gall disease. Plant Dis 72:241–246
Ricker AJ, Berbee JG, Smalley EB (1959) Effects of crown gall and hairy root on the growth of apple trees. Phytopathology 49:88–90
Lopatin MI (1939) Influence of bacterial root center on the development of the cherry tree in the orchard. Plant Prot 18:167–173
White PR, Braun AC (1941) Crown gall production by bacteria-free tumor tissues. Science 94:239–241
Braun AC (1947) Thermal studies on the factors responsible for the tumor initiation in crown gall. Am J Bot 34:234–240
Braun AC, Mandle RJ (1948) Studies on the inactivation of the tumor-inducing principle in crown gall. Growth 12:255–269
Zaenen I, Van Larebeke N, Teuchy H, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1974) Supercoiled circular DNA in crown-gall inducing Agrobacterium strains. J Mol Biol 86:109–127
Van Larebeke N, Enbler G, Holsters M, Van Den Elsacker S, Zaenen I, Schilperoort RA, Schell J (1974) Large plasmid in Agrobacterium tumefaciens essential for crown gall-inducing ability. Nature 252:169–170
Depicker A, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1978) Homologous sequences in different Ti plasmids are essential for oncogenicity. Nature 275:150–152
Chilton MD, Drummond MH, Merlo DJ, Sciaky D, Montoya AL, Gordon MP, Nester EW (1977) Stable incorporation of plasmid DNA into higher plant cells: the molecular basis of crown gall tumorigenesis. Cell 11:263–271
Chilton MD, Drummond MH, Merlo DJ, Sciaky D (1978) Highly conserved DNA of Ti plasmids overlaps T-DNA maintained in plant tumors. Nature 275:147–149
Gelvin SB (2003) Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 67:16–37
Escobar MA, Dandekar AM (2003) Agrobacterium tumefaciens as an agent of disease. Trends Plant Sci 8:380–386
Zambryski P, Joos PH, Genetello C, Leemans J, Van Montagu M, Schell J (1983) Ti plasmid vector for the introduction of DNA into plant cells without alteration of their normal regeneration capacity. EMBO J 2:2143–2150
Bevan M (1984) Binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res 12:8711–8721
Chilton MD (1993) Agrobacterium gene transfer: progress on a “poor man’s vector” for maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:3119–3120
Vanlentine L (2003) Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the plant: the David and Goliath of modern genetics. Plant Physiol 133:948–955
Lacroix B, Tzfira T, Vainstein A, Citovsky V (2006) A case of promiscuity: Agrobacterium’s endless hunt for new partners. Trends Genet 22:29–37
Guilley H, Dudley RK, Jonard G, Balazs E, Richards KE (1982) Transcription of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA: detection of promoter sequences and characterization of transcripts. Cell 30:763–773
Odell JT, Nagy F, Chua NH (1985) Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter. Nature 313:810–812
Fang RX, Nagy F, Sivasubramanian S, Chua NH (1989) Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. Plant Cell 1(1):141–150
Zarate R, Verpoorte R (2007) Strategies for the genetic modification of the medicinal plant Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don. Phytochem Rev 6:475–491
Benfey PN, Ren L, Chua NH (1990) Tissue specific expression from CaMV35S enhancer subdomains in early stages of plant development. EMBO J 9:1677–1684
Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J (1987) Duplication of the CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes. Science 236:1299–1302
Koosha F, Muller RH, Davis SS (1989) Poly hydroxy butyrate as a drug carrier. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 6:117–130
Zuo J, Chua NH (2000) Chemical inducible systems for regulated expression of plant genes Curr. Opin Biotechnol 11:146–151
Lessard PA, Kulaveerasingam H, York GM, Strong A, Sinskey AJ (2002) Manipulating gene expression for the metabolic engineering of plants. Metab Eng 4:67–79
Plesse B, Criqui MC, Durr A, Parmentier Y, Fleck J, Genschik P (2001) Effects of the polyubiquitin gene Ubi U4 leader intron and first ubiquitin monomer on reporter gene expression in Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Mol Biol 45:655–667
An YQ, Huang S, McDowell JM, McKinney EC, Meagher RB (1996) Conserved expression of the Arabidopsis ACT1 and ACT 3 actin subclass in organ primordia and mature pollen. Plant Cell 8:15–30
An YQ, McDowell JM, Huang S, McKinney EC, Chambliss S, Meagher RB (1996) Strong, constitutive expression of the Arabidopsis ACT2/ACT8 actin subclass in vegetative tissues. Plant J 10:107–121
Becker D, Brettschneider R, Lorz H (1994) Fertile transgenic wheat from microprojectile bombardment of scutellar tissue. Plant J 5:299–307
Molnar A, Lovas A, Banfalvi Z, Lakatos L, Polgar Z, Horvath S (2001) Tissue-specific signal(s) activate the promoter of a metallo carboxy peptidase inhibitor gene family in potato tuber and berry. Plant Mol Biol 46:301–311
Liu XJ, Prat S, Willmitzer L, Frommer WB (1990) Cis regulatory elements directing tuber-specific and sucrose-inducible expression of a chimeric class I patatin promoter/GUS-gene fusion. Mol Gen Genet 223:401–406
Qinggele C, Mingchun L, Dongsheng W, Yi C, Laijun X (2007) Isolation and sequencing analysis on the seed-specific promoter from soybean. Front Agric China 1:17–23
Chen ZL, Schuler MA, Beachy RN (1986) Functional analysis of regulatory elements in a plant embryo-specific gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 83:8560–8564
Russell DA, Fromm ME (1997) Tissue-specific expression in transgenic maize of four endosperm promoters from maize and rice. Transgenic Res 6:157–168
Rossi V, Motto M, Pellegrini L (1997) Analysis of the methylation pattern of the maize opaque-2 (O2) promoter and in vitro binding studies indicate that the O2 B-Zip protein and other endosperm factors can bind to methylated target sequences. J Biol Chem 272:13758–13765
Ali S, Taylor WC (2001) The 3Œ non-coding region of a C4 photosynthesis gene increases transgene expression when combined with heterologous promoters. Plant Mol Biol 46:325–333
Bate N, Twell D (1998) Functional architecture of a late pollen promoter: pollen-specific transcription is developmentally regulated by multiple stage-specific and co-dependent activator elements. Plant Mol Biol 37:859–869
Haran S, Logendra S, Seskar M, Bratanova M, Raskin I (2000) Characterization of Arabidopsis acid phosphatase promoter and regulation of acid phosphatase expression. Plant Physiol 124:615–626
De Veylder L, Van Montagu M, Inze D (1997) Herbicide safener inducible gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol 38:568–577
Frey AD, Rimann M, Bailey JE, Kallio PT, Thompson CJ, Fussenegger M (2001) Novel pristinamycin-responsive expression systems for plant cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 74:154–163
Martinez A, Sparks C, Hart CA, Thompson J, Jepson I (1999) Ecdysone agonist inducible transcription in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant J 19:97–106
Aoyama T, Chua NH (1997) A glucocorticoid-mediated transcriptional induction system in transgenic plants. Plant J 11:605–612
Caddick MX, Greenland AJ, Jepson I, Krause KP, Qu N, Riddell KV, Salter MG, Schuch W, Sonnewald U, Tomsett AB (1998) An ethanol inducible gene switch for plants used to manipulate carbon metabolism. Nat Biotechnol 16:177–180
Mysore KS, Ryu CM (2004) Nonhost resistance: how much do we know? Trends Plant Sci 9:97–104
Bolton MD (2009) Primary metabolism and plant defense–fuel for the fire. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:487–497
Kangasjarvi S, Neukermans J, Li S, Aro EM, Noctor G (2012) Photosynthesis, photorespiration and light signalling in defence responses. J Exp Bot 63:1619–1636
McKersie BD, Bowley SR, Jones KS (1999) Winter survival of transgenic alfalfa overexpressing superoxide dismutase. Plant Physiol 119:839–847
Tesfaye M, Temple SJ, Allen DL, Vance CP, Samac DA (2001) Overexpression of malate dehydrogenase in transgenic alfalfa enhances organic acid synthesis and confers tolerance to aluminum. Plant Physiol 127:1836–1844
Galili G, Hofgen R (2002) Metabolic engineering of amino acids and storage proteins in plants. Metab Eng 4:3–11
Chen THH, Murata N (2002) Enhancement of tolerance of abiotic stress by metabolic engineering of betaines and other compatible solutes. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:250–257
Zheng Z, Sumi K, Tanaka K, Murai N (1995) The bean seed storage protein p-Phaseolin 1s synthesized, processed, and accumulated in the vacuolar Type-lI protein bodies of transgenic rice endosperm. Plant Physiol 109:777–786
Chakraborty S, Chakraborty N, Datta A (2000) Increased nutritive value of transgenic potato by expressing a nonallergenic seed albumin gene from Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(7):3724–3729. doi:10.1073/pnas.050012697
Zhu XH, Galili G (2003) Increased lysine synthesis coupled with a knockout of its catabolism synergistically boosts lysine content and also transregulates the metabolism of other amino acids in Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Cell 15:845–853
Kok-Jacon GA, Ji Q, Vincken J-P, Visser RGF (2003) Towards a more versatile a-glucan synthesis in plants. J Plant Physiol 160:765–777
Regierer B, Fernie AR, Springer F, Perez-Melis A, Leisse A, Koehl K, Willmitzer L, Geigenberger P, Kossmann J (2002) Starch content and yield increase as a result of altering adenylate pools in transgenic plants. Nat Biotechnol 20:1256–1260
Rosche E, Blackmore D, Tegeder M, Richardson T, Schroeder H, Higgins TJV, Frommer WB, Offler CE, Patrick JW (2002) Seed-specific overexpression of the potato sucrose transporter increases sucrose uptake and growth rates of developing pea cotyledons. Plant J 30:165–175
Smidansky ED, Clancy M, Meyer FD, Lanning SP, Blake NK, Talbert LE, Giroux MJ (2002) Enhanced ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity in wheat endosperm increases seed yield. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:1724–1729
Smidansky ED, Martin JM, Hannah LC, Fischer AM, Giroux MJ (2003) Seed yield and plant biomass increases in rice are conferred by deregulation of endosperm ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase. Planta 216:656–664
Liu QQ, Wang ZY, Chen XH, Cai XL, Tang SZ, Yu HX, Zhang JL, Hong MM, Gu MH (2003) Stable inheritance of the antisense Waxy gene in transgenic rice with reduced amylose level and improved quality. Transgenic Res 12:71–82
Fujita N, Kubo A, Suh DS, Wong KS, Jane JL, Ozawa K, Takaiwa F, Inaba Y, Nakamura Y (2003) Antisense inhibition of isoamylase alters the structure of amylopectin and the physicochemical properties of starch in rice endosperm. Plant Cell Physiol 44:607–618
Andersson M, Melander M, Pojmark P, Larsson H, Leif B, Hofvander P (2006) Targeted gene suppression by RNA interference: an efficient method for production of high-amylose potato lines. J Biotechnol 123(2):137–148
Vincken QJJP, Suurs LCJM, Visser RGF (2003) Microbial starch-binding domains as a tool for targeting proteins to granules during starch biosynthesis. Plant Mol Biol 51:789–801
Ruan YL, Llewellyn DJ, Furbank RT (2003) Suppression of sucrose synthase gene expression represses cotton fiber cell initiation, elongation, and seed development. Plant Cell 15:952–964
Zhong RQ, Morrison WH, Freshour GD, Hahn MG, Ye ZH (2003) Expression of a mutant form of cellulose synthase AtCesA7 causes dominant negative effect on cellulose biosynthesis. Plant Physiol 132:786–795
Burn JE, Hocart CH, Birch RJ, Cork AC, Williamson RE (2002) Functional analysis of the cellulose synthase genes CesA1, CesA2, and CesA3 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 129:797–807
Aharoni A, Jongsma MA, Bouwmeester HJ (2005) Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plants. Trends Plant Sci 10:594–602
Mahmoud SS, Croteau RB (2002) Strategies for transgenic manipulation of monoterpene biosynthesis in plants. Trends Plant Sci 7(8):366–373
Wu M, Wu Y, Wang M (2006) Energy and emission benefits of alternative transportation liquid fuels derived from switchgrass: a fuel life cycle assessment. Biotechnol Prog 22(4):1012–1024
Bouwmeester HJ, Bertea CM, Kraker JW, Franssen MCR (2006) Research to improve artemisinin production for use in the preparation of anti-malarial drugs. In: Bogers RJ, Craker LE, Langer D (eds) Medicinal and aromatic plants. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 275–290
Lichtenthaler HK (1999) The 1-deoxy-d-xylulose-5-phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:47–65
Rodriguez-Concepcion M, Boronat A (2002) Elucidation of the methylerythritol phosphate pathway for isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria and plastids. A metabolic milestone achieved through genomics. Plant Physiol 103:1079–1089
Broun P, Somerville C (2001) Progress in plant metabolic engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:8925–8927
Lucker J, Bouwmeester HJ, Schwab W, Blaas J, van der Plas LH, Verhoeven HA (2001) Expression of Clarkia S-linalool synthase in transgenic petunia plants results in the accumulation of S-linalyl-b-d-glucopyranoside. Plant J 27:315–324
Lewinsohn E, Schalechet F, Wilkinson J, Matsui K, Tadmor Y, Nam KH, Amar O, Lastochkin E, Larkov O, Ravid U et al (2001) Enhanced levels of the aroma and flavour compound S-linalool by metabolic engineering of the terpenoid pathway in tomato fruits. Plant Physiol 127:1256–1265
Fraser PD, Romer S, Shipton CA, Mills PB, Kiano JW, Misawa N, Drake RG, Schuch W, Bramley PM (2002) Evaluation of transgenic tomato plants expressing an additional phytoene synthase in a fruit-specific manner. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:1092–1097
Sandmann G (2001) Genetic manipulation of carotenoid biosynthesis: strategies, problems and achievements. Trends Plant Sci 6:14–17
Beyer P, Al-Babili S, Ye X, Lucca P, Schaub P, Welsch R, Potrykus I (2002) Golden rice: Introducing the b-carotene biosynthesis pathway into rice endosperm by genetic engineering to defeat vitamin A deficiency. J Nutr 132:506S–510S
Kappers IF, Aharoni A, van Herpen TW, Luckerhoff LL, Dicke M, Bouwmeester HJ (2005) Genetic engineering of terpenoid metabolism attracts bodyguards to Arabidopsis. Science 309:2070–2072
Ralley L, Enfissi EM, Misawa N, Schuch W, Bramley PM, Fraser PD (2004) Metabolic engineering of ketocarotenoid formation in higher plants. Plant J 39:477–486
Niu Y, Luo H, Sun C, Yang TJ, Dong L, Huang L, Chen S (2014) Expression profiling of the triterpene saponin biosynthesis genes FPS, SS, SE, and DS in the medicinal plant Panax notoginseng. Gene 533(1):295–303
Sun Y, Zhao HW, Ge F, Shi L, Liu DQ (2013) The construction of over-expression vector for Panax notoginseng SS gene and its transformation] [Article in Chinese] Yao Xue Xue Bao 48(1):138–143
Chappell J (2004) Valencene synthase-a biochemical magician and harbinger of transgenic aromas. Trends Plant Sci 9:266–269
Zhou Z, He H, Ma L, Yu X, Mi Q, Pang J, Tang G, Bao L (2015) Overexpression of a GmCnx1 gene enhanced activity of nitrate reductase and aldehyde oxidase, and boosted mosaic virus resistance in soybean. PLoS One 10(4):e0124273
Wei Z, Qu Z, Zhang L, Zhao S, Bi Z, Ji X, Wang X, Wei H (2015) Overexpression of poplar xylem sucrose synthase in tobacco leads to a thickened cell wall and increased height. PLoS One 10(3):e0120669
Saema S, Rahman LU, Singh R, Niranjan A, Ahmad IZ, Misra P (2015) Ectopic overexpression of WsSGTL1, a sterol glucosyltransferase gene in Withania somnifera, promotes growth, enhances glycowithanolide and provides tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses. Plant Cell Rep 35(1):195–211
Yuan Y, Liu W, Zhang Q, Xiang L, Liu X, Chen M, Lin Z, Wang Q, Liao Z (2014) Overexpression of artemisinic aldehyde 11(13) reductase gene–enhanced artemisinin and its relative metabolite biosynthesis in transgenic Artemisia annua L. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 62(1):17–23
Alam P, Abdin MZ (2011) Over-expression of HMG-CoA reductase and amorpha-4,11-diene synthase genes in Artemisia annua L. and its influence on artemisinin content. Plant Cell Rep 30(10):1919–1928
Shen Q, Chen YF, Wang T, Wu SY, Lu X, Zhang L, Zhang FY, Jiang WM, Wang GF, Tang KX (2012) Overexpression of the cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (cyp71av1) and cytochrome P450 reductase (cpr) genes increased artemisinin content in Artemisia annua (Asteraceae). Genet Mol Res 11(3):3298–3309
Xu H, Park NI, Li X, Kim YK, Lee SY, Park SU (2010) Molecular cloning and characterization of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase and genes involved in flavone biosynthesis in Scutellaria baicalensis. Bioresour Technol 101(24):9715–9722
Li W, Wang B, Wang M, Chen M, Yin JM, Kaleri GM, Zhang RJ, Zuo TN, You X, Yang Q (2014) Cloning and characterization of a potato StAN11 gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis regulation. J Integr Plant Biol 56(4):364–372
Mrizova K, Jiskrova E, Vyroubalova S, Novak O, Ohnoutkova L, Pospisilova H, Frebort I, Harwood WA, Galuszka P (2013) Overexpression of cytokinin dehydrogenase genes in barley (Hordeum vulgare cv. Golden Promise) fundamentally affects morphology and fertility. PLoS One 8(11):e79029
Arun M, Subramanyam K, Theboral J, Sivanandhan G, Rajesh M, Kapil Dev G, Jaganath B, Manickavasagam M, Girija S, Ganapathi A (2014) Transfer and targeted overexpression of γ-tocopherol methyltransferase (γ-TMT) gene using seed-specific promoter improves tocopherol composition in Indian soybean cultivars. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 172(4):1763–1776
Han JY, Kim MJ, Ban YW, Hwang HS, Choi YE (2013) The involvement of β-amyrin 28-oxidase (CYP716A52v2) in oleanane-type ginsenoside biosynthesis in Panax ginseng. Plant Cell Physiol 54(12):2034–2046
Li JD, Qin BF, Yang CX, Lan XZ, Wu NB, Liao ZH (2013) Enhanced biosynthesis of scopolamine in transgenic Atropa belladonna by overexpression of h6h gene. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. [Article in Chinese] 38(11):1719–1724
Grover A, Samuel G, Bisaria VS, Sundar D (2013) Enhanced withanolide production by overexpression of squalene synthase in Withania somnifera. J Biosci Bioeng 115(6):680–685
Chen R, Harada Y, Bamba T, Nakazawa Y, Gyokusen K (2012) Overexpression of an isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase gene to enhance trans-polyisoprene production in Eucommia ulmoides Oliver. BMC Biotechnol 12:78
Aquil S, Husaini AM, Abdin MZ, Rather GM (2009) Overexpression of the HMG-CoA reductase gene leads to enhanced artemisinin biosynthesis in transgenic Artemisia annua plants. Planta Med 75(13):1453–1458
Rao AQ, Irfan M, Saleem Z, Nasir IA, Riazuddin S, Husnain T (2011) Overexpression of the phytochrome B gene from Arabidopsis thaliana increases plant growth and yield of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 12(4):326–334
Thiele A, Herold M, Lenk I, Quail PH, Gatz C (1999) Heterologous expression of Arabidopsis phytochrome B in transgenic potato influences photosynthetic performance and tuber development. Plant Physiol 120(1):73–82
Inui T, Kawano N, Shitan N, Yazaki K, Kiuchi F, Kawahara N, Sato F, Yoshimatsu K (2012) Improvement of benzylisoquinoline alkaloid productivity by overexpression of 3′-hydroxy-N-methylcoclaurine 4′-O-methyltransferase in transgenic Coptis japonica plants. Biol Pharm Bull 35(5):650–659
Zang YX, Kim JH, Park YD, Kim DH, Hong SB (2008) Metabolic engineering of aliphatic glucosinolates in Chinese cabbage plants expressing Arabidopsis MAM1, CYP79F1, and CYP83A1. BMB Rep 41:472–478
Seo JW, Jeong JH, Shin CG, Lo SC, Han SS, Yu KW, Harada E, Han JY, Choi YE (2005) Overexpression squalene synthase in Eleutherococcus senticosus increases phytosterol and triterpene accumulation. Phytochemistry 66:869–877
Dobnik D, Baebler S, Kogovšek P, Novak MP, Stebih D, Panter G, Janez N, Morisset D, Zel J, Gruden K (2013) β-1,3-glucanase class III promotes spread of PVYNTN and improves in planta protein production. Plant Biotechnol Rep 7(4):547–555
Broun P, Somerville C (1997) Accumulation of ricinoleic, lesquerolic, and densipolic acids in seeds of transgenic Arabidopsis plants that express a fatty acyl hydroxylase cDNA from castor bean. Plant Physiol 113(3):933–942
Sasaki K, Mito K, Ohara K, Yamamoto H, Yazaki K (2008) Cloning and characterization of naringenin 8-prenyltransferase, a flavonoid-specific prenyltransferase of Sophora flavescens. Plant Physiol 146(3):1075–1084
Zhang F, Lu X, Lv Z, Zhang L, Zhu M, Jiang W, Wang G, Sun X, Tang K (2013) Overexpression of the Artemisia orthologue of ABA receptor, AaPYL9, enhances ABA sensitivity and improves artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L. PLoS One 8(2):e56697
Wang Q, Xing S, Pan Q, Yuan F, Zhao J, Tian Y, Chen Y, Wang G, Tang K (2012) Development of efficient Catharanthus roseus regeneration and transformation system using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and hypocotyls as explants. BMC Biotechnol 12:34
Yun DJ, Hashimoto T, Yamada Y (1992) Metabolic engineering of medicinal plants: transgenic Atropa belladonna with an improved alkaloid composition (scoolamlne/hyoscyamine 61-hydroxylase). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:11799–11803
Huang Z, Lin J, Cheng Z, Xu M, Huang X, Yang Z, Zheng J (2015) Production of dammarane-type sapogenins in rice by expressing the dammarenediol-II synthase gene from Panax ginseng C.A. Mey. Plant Sci 239:106–114
Majumdar S, Garai S, Jha S (2012) Use of cryptogein gene to stimulate the accumulation of Bacopa saponins in transgenic Bacopa monnieri plants. Plant Cell Rep 31(10):1899–1909
Giovinazzo G, D’Amico L, Paradiso A, Bollini R, Sparvoli F, DeGara L (2005) Antioxidant metabolite profiles in tomato fruit constitutively expressing the grapevine stilbene synthase gene. Plant Biotechnol J 3(1):57–69
Lisko KA, Torres R, Harris RS, Belisle M, Vaughan MM, Jullian B, Chevone BI, Mendes P, Nessler CL, Lorence A (2013) Elevating vitamin C content via overexpression of myo-inositol oxygenase and l-gulono-1,4-lactone oxidase in Arabidopsis leads to enhanced biomass and tolerance to abiotic stresses. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 49(6):643–655
Han JY, Wang HY, Choi YE (2014) Production of dammarenediol-II triterpene in a cell suspension culture of transgenic tobacco. Plant Cell Rep 33(2):225–233
Lannenpaa M (2014) Heterologous expression of AtMYB12 in kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala) leads to high flavonol accumulation. Plant Cell Rep 33(8):1377–1388
Katsumoto Y, Mizutani MF, Fukui Y, Brugliera F, Holton TA, Karan M, Nakamura N, Sakakibara KY, Togami J, Pigeaire A, Tao GQ, Nehra NS, Lu CY, Dyson BK, Tsuda S, Ashikari T, Kusumi T, Mason JG, Tanaka Y (2007) Engineering of the rose flavonoid biosynthetic pathway successfully generated blue-hued flowers accumulating delphinidin. Plant Cell Physiol 48(11):1589–1600
Ziegler J, Facchini PJ (2008) Alkaloid biosynthesis: metabolism and trafficking. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:735–769
Fischbach MA, Clardy J (2007) One pathway, many products. Nat Chem Biol 3:353–355
Facchini PJ (1999) Plant secondary metabolism: out of the evolutionary abyss. Trends Plant Sci 4:382–384
Facchini PJ (2001) Alkaloid biosynthesis in plants: biochemistry, cell biology, molecular regulation, and metabolic engineering applications. Ann Rev Plant Biol 52:29–66
Maplestone RA, Stone MJ, Williams DH (1992) The evolutionary role of secondary metabolites – a review. Gene 115:151–157
Kim YS, Sano H (2008) Pathogen resistance of transgenic tobacco plants producing caffeine. Phytochemistry 69:882–888
Kim YS, Uefuji H, Ogita S, Sano H (2006) Transgenic tobacco plants producing caffeine: a potential new strategy for insect pest control. Transgenic Res 15:667–672
Hashimoto T, Yamada Y (2003) New genes in alkaloid metabolism and transport. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:163–168
Katoh A, Ohki H, Hashimoto T (2005) Molecular regulation of nicotine biosynthesis. Plant Biotechnol 22:389–392
De Boer KD, Dalton HL, Edward FJ, Ryan SM, Hamill JD (2013) RNAi-mediated down regulation of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) impedes wound-stress stimulation of anabasine synthesis in Nicotiana glauca. Phytochemistry 86:21–28
Park SU, Yu M, Facchini PJ (2002) Antisense RNA-mediated suppression of benzophenanthridine alkaloid biosynthesis in transgenic cell cultures of California poppy. Plant Physiol 128:696–706
Verpoorte R, Memelink J (2002) Engineering secondary metabolite production in plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 13:181–187
Dey PM, Harborne JB (1989) Methods in plant biochemistry: plant phenolics, vol 1. Academic, New York
Ryan D, Robards K, Prenzler P, Antolovich M (1999) Applications of mass spectrometry to plant phenols. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 18:362–372
Dixon RA, Paiva NL (1995) Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell 7:1085
Herrmann KM, Weaver LM (1999) The shikimate pathway. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:473–503
Winkel-Shirley B (2001) Flavonoid biosynthesis, a colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol 126:485–493. doi:10.1104/pp.126.2.485
Rosati C, Simoneau P, Treutter D, Poupard P, Cadot Y, Cadic A, Duron M (2003) Engineering of flower color in forsythia by expression of two independently-transformed dihydroflavonol 4-reductase and anthocyanidin synthase genes of flavonoid pathway. Mol Breed 12:197–208
Forkmann G, Martens S (2001) Metabolic engineering and application of flavonoids. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:155–160
Muir SR, Collins GJ, Robinson S, Hughes S, Bovy A, De Vos CHR, Van Tunen AJ, Verhoeyen ME (2001) Overexpression of petunia chalcone isomerase in tomato results in fruits containing increased levels of flavonoids. Nat Biotechnol 19:470–474
Verhoeyen ME, Bovy A, Collins G, Muir S, Robinson S, de Vos CHR, Colliver S (2002) Increasing antioxidant levels in tomatoes through modification of the flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. J Exp Bot 53:2099–2106. doi:10.1093/jxb/erf044
Frary A, Nesbitt TC, Grandillo S, van der Knaap E, Cong B, Liu J, Meller J, Elber R, Alpert KB, Tanksley SD (2000) fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289(5476):85–88
Wang H, Jones B, Li Z, Frasse P, Delalande C, Regad F, Chaabouni S, Latche A, Pech JC, Bouzayen M (2005) The tomato Aux/IAA transcription factor IAA9 is involved in fruit development and leaf morphogenesis. Plant Cell 17:2676–2692
Goetz M, Hooper LC, Johnson SD, Rodrigues JC, Vivian-Smith A, Koltunow AM (2007) Expression of aberrant forms of AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR8 stimulates parthenocarpy in Arabidopsis and tomato. Plant Physiol 145:351–366
Bartoszewski G, Niedziela A, Szwacka M, Niemirowicz-Szczytt K (2003) Modification of tomato taste in transgenic plants carrying a thaumatin gene from Thaumatococcus daniellii Benth. Plant Breed 122(4):347–351
Smith DL, Abbott JA, Gross KC (2002) Down-regulation of tomato betagalactosidase 4 results in decreased fruit softening. Plant Physiol 129:1755–1762
Brummell DA, Harpster MH, Civello PM, Palys JM, Bennett AB, Dunsmuir P (1999) Modification of expansin protein abundance in tomato fruit alters softening and cell wall polymer metabolism during ripening. Plant Cell 11:2203–2216
Tieman DM, Handa AK (1994) Reduction in pectin methyltransferase activity modifies tissue integrity and cation levels in ripening tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) fruits. Plant Physiol 106:429–436
Langley KR, Martin A, Stenning R, Murray AJ, Hobson GE, Schuch WW, Bird CR (1994) Mechanical and optical assessment of the ripening of tomato fruit with reduced polygalacturonase activity. J Sci Food Agric 66(4):547–554
Tieman DM, Zeigler M, Schmelz EA, Taylor MG, Bliss P, Kirst M, Klee HJ (2006) Identification of loci affecting flavour volatile emissions in tomato fruits. J Exp Bot 57:887–896
Diaz de la Garza RID, Quinlivan R, Klaus EP, Basset SM, Gregory GJ, Hanson AD (2004) Folate biofortification in tomatoes by engineering the pteridine branch of folate synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:13720–13725
Diaz de la Garza RID, Gregory JF, Hanson AD (2007) Folate biofortification of tomato fruit. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(10):4218–4222
Zhang C, Liu J, Zhang Y, Cai X, Gong P, Zhang J, Wang T, Li H, Ye Z (2011) Overexpression of SlGMEs leads to ascorbate accumulation with enhanced oxidative stress, cold, and salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Rep 30:389–398
Gilbert L, Alhagdow M, Nunes-Nesi A, Quemener B, Guillon F, Bouchet B, Faurobert M, Gouble B, Page D, Garcia V, Petit J, Stevens R, Causse M, Fernie AR, Lahaye M, Rothan C, Baldet P (2009) GDP-D-mannose 3,5-epimerase (GME) plays a key role at the intersection of ascorbate and non-cellulosic cell-wall biosynthesis in tomato. Plant J 60:499–508
Garcia V, Stevens R, Gil L, Gilbert L, Gest N, Petit J, Faurobert M, Maucourt M, Deborde C, Moing A, Poessel JL, Jacob D, Bouchet JP, Giraudel JL, Gouble B, Page D, Alhagdow M, Massot C, Gautier H, Lemaire-Chamley M, Rolin D, Usadel B, Lahaye M, Causse M, Baldet P, Rothan C (2009) An integrative genomics approach for deciphering the complex interactions between ascorbate metabolism and fruit growth and composition in tomato. C R Biol 332:1007–1021
Ronen G, Carmel-Goren L, Zamir D, Hirschberg J (2000) An alternative pathway to β-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:11102–11107
D’Ambrosio C, Giorio G, Marino I, Merendino A, Petrozza A, Salfi L, Stigliani AL, Cellini F (2004) Virtually complete conversion of lycopene into β-carotene in fruits of tomato plants transformed with the tomato lycopene β-cyclase (tlcy-b) cDNA. Plant Sci 166:207–214
Rosati C, Aquilani R, Dharmapuri S, Pallara P, Marusic C, Tavazza R, Bouvier F, Camara B, Giuliano G (2000) Metabolic engineering of β-carotene and lycopene content in tomato fruit. Plant J 24:413–420
Wurbs D, Ruf S, Bock B (2007) Contained metabolic engineering in tomatoes by expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes from the plastid genome. Plant J 49:276–288
Romer S, Fraser PD, Kiano JW, Shipton CA, Mills PB, Drake R, Schuch W, Bramley PM (2000) Elevation of the provitamin A content of transgenic tomato plants. Nat Biotechnol 18:666–669
Enfissi EMA, Fraser PD, Lois LM, Boronat A, Schuch W, Bramley PM (2005) Metabolic engineering of the mevalonate and non-mevalonate isopentenyl diphosphate-forming pathways for the production of health-promoting isoprenoids. Plant Biotechnol J 3:17–27
Zanor MI, Osorio S, Nunes Nesi A, Carrari F, Lohse M, Usadel B, Kuhn C, Bleiss W, Giavalisco P, Willmitzer L, Sulpice R, Zhou YH, Fernie AR (2009) RNA interference of LIN5 in tomato confirms its role in controlling Brix content, uncovers the influence of sugars on the levels of fruit hormones, and demonstrates the importance of sucrose cleavage for normal fruit development and fertility. Plant Physiol 150:1204–1218
Colliver S, Bovy A, Collins G, Muir S, Robinson S, de Vos CHR, Verhoeyen ME (2002) Improving the nutritional content of tomatoes through reprogramming their flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Phytochem Rev 1:113–123
Adato A, Mandel T, Mintz-Oron S, Venger I, Levy D, Yativ M, Dominguez E, Wang Z, De Vos RC, Jetter R, Schreiber L, Heredia A, Rogachev I, Aharoni A (2009) Fruit-surface flavonoid accumulation in tomato is controlled by a SlMYB12 regulated transcriptional network. PLoS Genet 5(12):e1000777
Butelli E, Titta L, Giorgio M, Mock HP, Matros A, Peterek S, Schijlen EG, Hall RD, Bovy AG, Luo J, Martin C (2008) Enrichment of tomato fruit with health promoting anthocyanins by expression of select transcription factors. Nat Biotechnol 26:1301–1308
Schijlen E, de Vos CHR, Jonker H, van den Broeck H, Molthoff J, van Tunen A, Martens S, Bovy A (2006) Pathway engineering for healthy phytochemicals leading to the production of novel flavonoids in tomato fruit. Plant Biotechnol J 4:433–444
Simkin AJ, Gaffe J, Alcaraz JP, Carde JP, Bramley PM, Fraser PD, Kuntz M (2007) Fibrillin influence on plastid ultrastructure and pigment content in tomato fruit. Phytochemistry 68(11):1545–1556
Neily MH, Matsukura C, Maucourt M, Bernillon S, Deborde C, Moing A, Yin YG, Saito T, Mori K, Asamizu E, Rolin D, Moriguchi T, Ezura H (2011) Enhanced polyamine accumulation alters carotenoid metabolism at the transcriptional level in tomato fruit over-expressing spermidine synthase. J Plant Physiol 168(3):242–252
Dharmapuri S, Rosati C, Pallara P, Aquilani R, Bouvier F, Camara B, Giuliano G (2002) Metabolic engineering of xanthophyll content in tomato fruits. FEBS Lett 519:30–34
Davuluri GR, van Tuinen A, Fraser PD, Manfredonia A, Newman R, Burgess D, Brummell DA, King SR, Palys J, Uhlig J, Bramley PM, Pennings HM, Bowler C (2005) Fruit-specific RNAi-mediated suppression of DET1 enhances carotenoid and flavonoid content in tomatoes. Nat Biotechnol 23:890–895
Wang S, Liu J, Feng Y, Niu X, Giovannoni J, Liu Y (2008) Altered plastid levels and potential for improved fruit nutrient content by downregulation of the tomato DDB1-interacting protein CUL4. Plant J 55(1):89–103
Liu Y, Roof S, Ye Z, Barry C, van Tuinen A, Vrebalov J, Bowler C, Giovannoni J (2004) Manipulation of light signal transduction as a means of modifying fruit nutritional quality in tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:9897–9902
Giliberto L, Perrotta G, Pallara P, Weller JL, Fraser PD, Bramley PM, Fiore A, Tavazza M, Giuliano G (2005) Manipulation of the blue light photoreceptor cryptochrome 2 in tomato affects vegetative development, flowering time, and fruit antioxidant content. Plant Physiol 137:199–208
Li L, Zhou YH, Cheng XF, Sun JY, Marita JM, Ralph J, Chiang VL (2003) Combinatorial modification of multiple lignin traits in trees through multigene co-transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:4939–4944
Abbott JC, Barakate A, Pincon G, Legrand M, Lapierre C, Mila I, Schuch W, Halpin C (2002) Simultaneous suppression of multiple genes by single transgenes. Down-regulation of three unrelated lignin biosynthetic genes in tobacco. Plant Physiol 128:844–853
Chabannes M, Barakate A, Lapierre C, Marita JM, Ralph J, Pean M, Danoun S, Halpin C, Grima-Pettenati J, Boudet AM (2001) Strong decrease in lignin content without significant alteration of plant development is induced by simultaneous down-regulation of cinnamoyl CoA reductase (CCR) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD) in tobacco plants. Plant J 28:257–270
Kawaoka A, Ebinuma H (2001) Transcriptional control of lignin biosynthesis by tobacco LIM protein. Phytochemistry 57:1149–1157
Boudet AM, Kajita S, Grima-Pettenati J, Goffner D (2003) Lignins and lignocellulosics: a better control of synthesis for new and improved uses. Trends Plant Sci 8:576–581
Anterola AM, Lewis NG (2002) Trends in lignin modification: a comprehensive analysis of the effects of genetic manipulations/mutations on lignification and vascular integrity. Phytochemistry 61:221–294
Boerjan W, Ralph J, Baucher M (2003) Lignin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Biol 54:519–546
Bell-Lelong DA, Cusumano JC, Meyer K, Chapple C (1997) Cinnamate- 4-hydroxylase expression in Arabidopsis. Regulation in response to development and the environment. Plant Physiol 113:729–738
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Khan, S., ur Rahman, L. (2017). Pathway Modulation of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants Through Metabolic Engineering Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens . In: Jha, S. (eds) Transgenesis and Secondary Metabolism. Reference Series in Phytochemistry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28669-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28669-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28668-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28669-3
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics