Skip to main content

Bacterial Electrotransformation: An Interface Between Technology and Art

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Electroporation

Abstract

Since its inception during the early 1980s, electrotransfection has likely become the most widely employed technique to transform bacteria that are not naturally competent. Electrotransformation has been applied to virtually all families of culturable bacteria and has contributed to and enhanced the development of molecular tools to achieve genetic tractability. Electrotransformation of non-pathogenic, laboratory Escherichia coli strains is the focus of this chapter’s discussion because, in all likelihood, they are the most widely electroporated bacteria; thereby facilitating comparisons and highlighting contrasts. A few recently reported improvements of and amendments to E. coli electrotransformation protocols are presented, electroporation parameters optimization discussed, and a few select, representative families of electrotransformed eubacteria examined. For the sake of focus, electroporation is addressed in the context of bacterial transformation exclusively not withstanding recent development of an assortment of applications. In spite of technical improvements, innovative applications, and utilization of the technique over a growing range of bacterial species, much remains to be learned and understood regarding the mechanisms involved in pore formation and macromolecule translocation mediated by electric pulse into prokaryotes, among other reasons addressed here, because of bacterial cell envelopes’ considerable structural diversity and complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aune TE, Aachmann FL (2010) Methodologies to increase the transformation efficiencies and the range of bacteria that can be transformed. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 85:1301–1313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach E, Fernandes GDC, Passaglia LMP (2016) How to transform a recalcitrant Paenibacillus strain: from culture medium to restriction barrier. J Microbiol Methods 131:135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvin NM, Hanawalt PC (1988) High-efficiency transformation of bacterial cells by electroporation. J Bacteriol 170(6):2796–2801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datsenko KA, Wanner BL (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(12):6640–6645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dower WJ, Miller JF, Ragsdale CW (1988) High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation. Nucleic Acids Res 16(13):6127–6145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunny GM, Lee LN, LeBlanc DJ (1991) Improved electroporation and cloning vector system for gram-positive bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 57(4):1194–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Frischer ME, Thurmond JM, Paul JH (1990) Natural plasmid transformation in a high-frequency-of-transformation marine Vibrio strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(11):3439–3444

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales MF, Brooks T, Pukatzki SU, Provenzano D (2013) Rapid protocol for preparation of electrocompetent Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae. J Vis Exp 8(80):e50684

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith F (1928) The significance of Pneumococcal types. J Hyg 27(2):113–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamashima H, Nakano T, Tamura S, Arai T (1990) Genetic transformation of Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Vibrio alginolyticus, and Vibrio cholerae non O-1 with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Microbiol Immunol 34(8):703–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanahan D (1983) Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids. J Mol Biol 166:557–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klevanskaa K, Bier N, Stingl K, Strauch E, Hertwig S (2014) PVv3, a new shuttle vector for gene expression in Vibrio vulnificus. Appl Environ Microbiol 80(4):1477–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koprowski H 2nd, Levine MM, Anderson RJ, Losonsky G, Pizza M, Barry EM (2000) Attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a vaccine strain CVD 1204 expressing colonization factor antigen I and mutant heat-labile enterotoxin of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 68(9):4884–4892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee DJ, Bingle LE, Heurlier K, Pallen MJ, Penn CW, Busby SJ, Hobman JL (2009) Gene doctoring: a method for recombineering in laboratory and pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. BMC Microbiol 9:252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo Scrudato M, Blokesch M (2012) The regulatory network of natural competence and transformation of Vibrio cholerae. PLoS Genet 8(6):e1002778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukjancenko O, Wassenaar TM, Ussery DW (2010) Comparison of 61 sequenced Escherichia coli genomes. Microb Ecol 60(4):708–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandel M, Higa A (1970) Calcium-dependent bacteriophage DNA infection. J Mol Biol 53(1):159–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JF (1994) Bacterial transformation by electroporation. Methods Enzymol 235:375–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1(7):841–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nováková J, Izsáková A, Grivalský T, Ottmann C, Farkašovský C (2014) Improved method for high-efficiency electrotransformation of Escherichia coli with the large BAC plasmids. Folia Microbiol 59:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan D, Charbit A (1990) High efficiency transformation of Salmonella typhimurium and Salmonella typhi by electroporation. Mol Gen Genet 223(1):156–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohse M, Takahashi K, Kadowaki Y, Kusaoke H (1995) Effects of plasmid DNA sizes and several other factors on transformation of Bacillus subtilis ISW1214 with plasmid DNA by electroporation. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 59(8):1433–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng D, Luo Y, Guo S, Zeng H, Ju S, Yu Z, Sun M (2009) Elaboration of an electroporation protocol for large plasmids and wild-type strains of Bacillus thuringiensis. J Appl Microbiol 106(6):1849–1858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Dorman CJ (1997) Virulence gene deletion frequency is increased in Shigella flexneri following conjugation, transduction, and transformation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 47(1):163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann W (2007) Production of recombinant proteins in Bacillus subtilis. Adv Appl Microbiol 62:137–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Y, Mancino V, Birren B (1995) Transformation of Escherichia coli with large DNA molecules by electroporation. Nucleic Acid Res 23(11):1990–1996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shivarova N, Förster W, Jacob HE, Grigorova R (1983) Microbiological implications of electric field effects VII. Stimulation of plasmid transformation of Bacillus cereus protoplasts by electric field pulses. J Basic Microbiol 23(9):595–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevors JT (1990) Electroporation and expression of plasmid pBR322 in Klebsiella aerogenes NCTC 418 and plasmid pRK2501 in Pseudomonas putida CYM 318. J Basic Microbiol 30(1):57–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu Q, Yin J, Fu J, Herrmann J, Li Y, Yin Y, Stewart AF, Müller R, Zhang Y (2016) Room temperature electrocompetent bacterial cells improve DNA transformation and recombineering efficiency. Sci Rep 6:24648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turgeon N, Laflamme C, Ho J, Duchaine C (2006) Elaboration of an electroporation protocol for Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579. J Microbiol Methods 67(3):543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Griffiths MW (2009) Mg2+-free buffer elevates transformation efficiency of Vibrio parahaemolyticus by electroporation. Lett Appl Microbiol 48(3):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie TD, Sun L, Zhao HG, Fuchs HG, Tsong TY (1992) Study effects of DNA topology on cell uptake and transfection efficiency. Biophys J 63:1026–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

DP was supported by National Institutes of Health grants MD001091-01 and GM068855-02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele Provenzano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Provenzano, D., Trevino, V., Ermolinsky, B. (2018). Bacterial Electrotransformation: An Interface Between Technology and Art. In: Miklavcic, D. (eds) Handbook of Electroporation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26779-1_73-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26779-1_73-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26779-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26779-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics