Abstract
A 24 year old healthy male had a motor vehicle accident (MVA) in 2001 at age 11 resulting in an open right femur fracture. It was treated with an external fixator with no deformity correction. The femur healed in 40° of flexion causing hip and knee pain and a 4.5 cm limb length discrepancy. A first stage of femoral deformity correction was performed. In a second stage, femur lengthening will be offered using an intramedullary motorized nail. A fixator-assisted nailing was performed for the first stage, achieving a good clinical and radiographic outcome.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download reference work entry PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
1 Brief Clinical History
This is a healthy 24 year old male that had a (MVA) 13 years ago with an open femoral fracture. Multiple surgeries were performed at that time that included debridements and a static monolateral external fixator. No deformity correction was performed at that time. He developed a femoral malunion: 40° of femur procurvatum and a 4.5 cm leg length discrepancy. The patient presented with knee and hip pain that had been ongoing for several years. A fixator-assisted nailing was offered and accepted by the patient. The leg length discrepancy correction will be performed in the near future using an intramedullary motorized nail.
3 Preoperative Problem List
-
1.
Right femur 40° procurvatum deformity
-
2.
4.5 cm limb length discrepancy
-
3.
Sciatic nerve at risk
4 Treatment Strategy
-
1.
Peroneal nerve release (do not close the wound, monitor nerve tension during surgery)
-
2.
Open wedge resection (location and size previously planned)
-
3.
Proximal fragment reaming
-
4.
Distal fragment reaming through osteotomy
-
5.
Nail insertion
-
6.
Autograft application (from resected wedge)
5 Basic Principles
The surgical planning should consider a wedge with an angle equal to the angle to correct. Its apex should be located posteriorly in the bone (closed wedge) to keep the bone length. In case a concern of sciatic nerve stretching exists, the apex should be located at the posterior soft tissues (trapezoid bone wedge). In that case, less nerve stretching will take place. Temporary anterior and lateral external fixation (fixator-assisted nailing) is an option during the surgery to help with reduction and maintain rotational alignment (not used in this case). A lengthening will be performed at a second stage as needed to achieve femoral length equality. An alternative would have been to do a percutaneous osteotomy and perform a gradual correction using a Taylor spatial frame. However, following patient desires to avoid external fixation, a staged procedure was elected as the treatment method.
7 Technical Pearls
-
1.
Plan pre-operatively your closing wedge resection according to the deformity.
-
2.
Perform a peroneal nerve release, and do not close the wound until the end of the procedure. This helps monitor the sciatic nerve tension during the reduction maneuver.
-
3.
Ream the distal bone segment through the osteotomy site in case of sclerotic bone. If not, a regular antegrade reaming can be performed.
-
4.
Countersink the nail 0.5 cm in the insertion site proximally. Then, place the distal locking screws. After the locking screws are in place, perform a backslapping of the nail using the extractor jig of the nail. This will help compress the osteotomy site.
9 Avoiding and Managing Problems
Doing a closing wedge resection is less likely to cause nerve damage. In cases of severe long-term deformity, it is advisable to perform peroneal nerve release at the proximal tibia at the beginning of the surgery to decompress and monitor the nerve tension. If there is a concern of sciatic nerve palsy, locate the apex of the bone wedge at the posterior thigh soft tissues to ensure that the sciatic nerve is not changing its length. With this planning, a trapezoid instead of a triangle will be removed from the femur. This will slightly shorten the extremity.
10 Cross-References
References and Suggested Reading
Boopalan PR, Sait A, Jepegnanam TS, Matthai T, Varghese VD (2014) The efficacy of single-stage open intramedullary nailing of neglected femur fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(2):759–764
Gahukamble A, Nithyananth M, Venkatesh K, Amritanand R, Cherian VM (2009) Open intramedullary nailing in neglected femoral diaphyseal fractures. Injury 40(2):209–212
Tall M, Ouedraogo I, Nd Kasse A, Tekpa BJ, Bonkoungou G, Belem S, Toe MF, Da SC (2012) Femur malunion treated with open osteotomy and intramedullary nailing in developing countries. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 98(7):784–787
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wagner, P., Herzenberg, J.E. (2015). Case 2: 40 Degree Femoral Procurvatum Deformity Treated with Internal Fixation. In: Rozbruch, S., Hamdy, R. (eds) Limb Lengthening and Reconstruction Surgery Case Atlas. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18026-7_319
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18026-7_319
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18025-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18026-7
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine