Skip to main content

MIS Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty with the Extramedullary Technique

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics
  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) unicondylar knee arthroplasty has gained popularity over the recent years following the introduction of the limited approach by Repicci and Eberle [1]. Their limited approach was essentially a freehand technique that used limited instrumentation. Over the years there have been modifications in the surgical instruments in order to perform the procedure accurately and reproducibly through an MIS approach. The Miller Galante unicondylar prosthesis (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) introduced intramedullary instrumentation and most recently extramedullary instrumentation [2]. The smaller and reliable modified instruments clearly help in bone preparation and component position producing clinical results that are comparable with a conventional procedure [3, 4]. Improved instrumentation allows the surgeon to operate through a minimally invasive arthrotomy, without everting the patella, and permits more accurate bone resection. It is the refinements in instrumentation that have contributed to successful clinical results.

Adapted from Scuderi GR, Minimally invasive surgery for unicondylar knee arthroplasty: the extramedullary technique, in Scuderi GR, Tria AJ, Berger RA (eds.), MIS Techniques in Orthopedics, 2006, with kind permission of Springer Science + Business Media.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee replacement. J South Orthop Assoc. 1999;8:20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zimmer monograph. The Zimmer unicompartmental high flex knee: intramedullary, spacer block option and extramedullary minimally invasive surgical techniques, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes CL, Scott RD. Unicondylar replacement. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ, editors. Surgical techniques in total knee arthroplasty. New York: Springer; 2002. p. 106–11.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Scuderi GR. Instrumentation for unicondylar knee replacement. In: Scuderi GR, Tria AJ, editors. MIS of the hip and the knee: a clinical perspective. New York: Springer; 2004. p. 87–104.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, et al. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: clinical experience at 6- to 10- year follow-up. Clin Orthop. 1999;367:50–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:782–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giles R. Scuderi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland (outside the USA)

About this entry

Cite this entry

Scuderi, G.R. (2015). MIS Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty with the Extramedullary Technique. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15206-6_53-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15206-6_53-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15206-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics