Abstract
Clinical ethics support services (CESS) are services that aim at supporting health-care professionals (including ancillary staff, managers, and directors), patients, and their families when being confronted with an ethical concern, question, or dilemma. CESS are increasingly being implemented in the USA, Canada, Europe, and slowly also within other parts of the world. Delivery of CESS is often categorized, broadly speaking, into three different models: clinical ethics committees (CEC), individual ethics consultants (EC), and facilitation of moral case deliberation (MCD). Strengths and weaknesses of these three models are discussed. Furthermore, attention is being paid to the ongoing debate on quality and training of CES. Finally, this entry ends with a brief summary on the current developments concerning the evaluation of CESS, CESS outcomes, and CESS’s impact on quality of care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abma, T., Molewijk, B., & Widdershoven, G. (2009). Good care in ongoing dialogue. Improving the quality of care through moral deliberation and responsive evaluation. Health Care Analysis, 17(3), 217–235.
ASBH. (2010). CECA Report to the board of directors: Certification, accreditation, and credentialing (C/A/C) of clinical ethics consultants.
Aulisio, M. P., Arnold, R. M., & Youngner, S. J. (2000). Health care ethics consultation: Nature, goals, and competencies. A position paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Ann Intern Med, 133(1), 59–69.
Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13–25. doi:10.1080/15265160601109085.
Molewijk, B., Abma, T., Stolper, M., & Widdershoven, G. (2008). Teaching ethics in the clinic: The theory and practice of moral case deliberation. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34, 120–124.
Molewijk, B., Hartman, L., Weidema, F., Voskes, Y., & Widdershoven, G. (2015). Fostering the ethics of ethics consultants in health care: An ongoing participatory approach. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(5), 60–62.
O’Brien, L. A. (2005). Establishing and educating a long-term care regional ethics committee: The NJ model. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 6(1), 66–67. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.013.
Pedersen, R., Hurst, S., Schildmann, J., Schuster, S., & Molewijk, B. (2010). The development of a descriptive evaluation tool for clinical ethics case consultations. Clinical Ethics, 5, 136–141.
Schildmann, J., Molewijk, B., Benaroyo, L., Førde, R., & Neitzke, G. (2013). Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(11), 681–685.
Slowther, A. M., Hope, T., & Bunch, C. (1999). Clinical ethics committees in the UK. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 33(3), 202–203.
Slowther, A. M., McClimans, L., & Price, C. (2012). Development of clinical ethics services in the UK: A national survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38(4), 210–214.
Stolper, M., Molewijk, B., & Widdershoven, G. (2015). Learning by doing. Training health care professionals to become facilitators of moral case deliberation. HEC Forum, 27(1), 47–59. doi:10.1007/s10730-014-9251-7.
Svantesson, M., Karlsson, J., Boitte, P., Schildmann, J., Dauwerse, L., Widdershoven, G., Pedersen, R., Huisman, M., & Molewijk, B. (2014). Outcomes of moral case deliberation – The development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD). BMC Medical Ethics, 15, 30.
Tarzian, A., Wocial, L., & The ASBH Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs Committee. (2015). A code of ethics for healthcare ethics consultants: Journey to the present & implications for the field. The American Journal of Bioethics, 15(5), 60–62.
Widdershoven, G., Molewijk, B. (2010). Philosophical foundations of clinical ethics: A hermeneutic perspective. In: J. Schildmann, J-S. Gordon, J. Vollmann (Eds.), Clinical ethics consultation. Theories and methods, implementation, evaluation (pp. 37–51). Farnham: Ashgate.
Further Readings
ASBH. (2011). Core competencies for health care ethics consultation: The report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (2nd ed.). Glenview: ASBH, American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
Doucet, H., Larouche, J. M., & Melchin, K. R. (Eds.). (2001). Ethical deliberation in multiprofessional health care teams. Ottowa: University of Ottowa Press.
Molewijk, B., Slowther, A. M., & Aulisio, M. (2011). The practical importance of theory in clinical ethics support services. Bioethics, 25(7), ii–iii (see the entire thematic issue of Bioethics).
Schildmann, J., Gordon, J. S., Vollmann, J. (Eds.). (2010). Clinical ethics consultation. Theories and methods, implementation, evaluation. Farnham: Ashgate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Molewijk, B., Slowther, A., Aulisio, M. (2016). Clinical Ethics: Support. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_87
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_87
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities