Skip to main content

Weapons

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 48 Accesses

Abstract

Biological and chemical weapons are the only two weapon classes that are comprehensively banned as weapons of war by international law. The prohibition of biological and chemical weapons is said to be based on an ancient cross-cultural taboo against poison and disease weapons, which has now been codified in international law. However, moral and ethical reasons have also been used to justify research, development, and use of these weapons in the past and are being reused to undermine the modern norm against these weapons and threaten their reemergence. This entry looks at the arguments used to justify the use and development of chemical and biological weapons in light of a changing nature and character of organized violence and technological advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balmer, B. (2013). Secrecy and science: A historical sociology of biological and chemical warfare. London: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. (1986). The social history of the machine gun. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusterson, H. (1996). Nuclear rites: A weapons laboratory at the end of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., & Paxman, J. (2002). A higher form of killing: The secret history of chemical and biological warfare. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, C. (2009). The taboo of chemical and biological weapons: Nature, norms and international law. D.Phil Dissertation, University of Sussex, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, M. (2006). New and old wars: Organized violence in a global era (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, R. (2006). Paradise lost: The psycho agents. The CBW Conventions Bulletin, (71), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2011). Life sciences and related fields: Trends relevant to the biological weapons convention. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OPCW. (2014). Convergence of chemistry and biology: Report of the Scientific Advisory Board’s Temporary Working Group. The Hague: OPCW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B., & McLeish, C. (2007). A web of prevention: Biological weapons, life sciences and the governance of research. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2009). Chemical and biological weapons. In N. E. Busch & D. H. Joyner (Eds.), Combating weapons of mass destruction (pp. 74–94). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2012). “Incapacitating chemical agents” in context: an historical overview of states policy Expert Meeting “Incapacitating Chemical Agents” Law enforcement, Human Rights Law, and Policy Perspectives. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, N. R. A. (2001). The evolution of biological disarmament. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wynen Thomas, A., & Thomas, A. J., Jr. (1970). Legal limits on the use of chemical and biological weapons. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2004). Public health response to biological and chemical weapons – WHO guidance (2nd ed.). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Guillemin, J. (2005). Biological weapons: From the invention of state-sponsored programs to contemporary bioterrorism. New York/Chichester: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappert, B., & McLeish, C. (2007). A web of prevention: Biological weapons, life sciences and the governance of research. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. B. (2012). Innovation, dual use, and security: Managing the risks of emerging biological and chemical technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai ilchmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

ilchmann, K. (2015). Weapons. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_441-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_441-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics