Abstract
Although imprisonment limits many rights of a person, a prisoner still retains the right to health. Upon imprisonment, the health care for prisoners becomes a State obligation. International guidelines recommend that health care in prison must be administered independently of the reasons for imprisonment and governed by the same medical ethics that exists outside prisons. The minimum standard of care in prison that must be respected universally is the principle of equivalence of care. In this entry, two basic medico-ethical concerns relevant in prison health care are discussed: confidentiality in seeking health care and dual loyalty of medical professionals. The latter includes dual loyalty in difficult situations such as torture, solitary confinement, and hunger strike. Even today, health care personnel in prisons work in conditions where they are unable to respect the basic principles of medical ethics. Resources and conditions to allow these professionals to respect the basic principles are critical and should be provided. Whenever these conditions and resources are unavailable, their lack should be reported. Prisoners are entitled to receive medical care which is equivalent to the care that any other patient who is not incarcerated receives.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aday, R. H. (2005–2006). Aging prisoners’ concerns toward dying in prison. OMEGA, 52(3), 199–216.
Andorno, R., Shaw, D. M., & Elger, B. S. (2015). Protecting prisoners’ autonomy with advance directives: Ethical dilemmas and policy issues. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 18(1), 33–39.
Appelbaum, P. S. (2002). Privacy in psychiatric treatment: Threats and responses. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(11), 1809–1818.
Elger, B. S., Handtke, V., & Wangmo, T. (2015). Informing patients about limits to confidentiality: A qualitative interview study of health professionals. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.
Fazel, S., Hope, T., O’Donnell, I., Piper, M., & Jacoby, R. (2001). Health of elderly male prisoners: Worse than the general population, worse than younger prisoners. Age and Ageing, 30, 403–407.
Fazel, S., Hope, T., O’Donnell, I., & Jacoby, R. (2004). Unmet treatment needs of older prisoners: A primary care survey. Age and Ageing, 33(4), 396–398.
Human Rights Watch. (2012). Old behind bars: The aging prison population in the United States. http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/usprisons0112webwcover_0.pdf
Loeb, S. J., & Abudagga, A. (2006). Health-related research on older inmates: An integrative review. Research in Nursing and Health, 29(6), 556–565.
Miles, S. H. (2007). Medical ethics and the interrogations of Guantanamo 063. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(4), 5–11.
Niveau, G. (2007). Relevance and limits of the principle of “equivalence of care” in prison medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 610–613.
Pinta, E. R. (2009). Decisions to breach confidentiality when prisoners report violations of institutional rules. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37, 150–154.
Sebo, P., Guilbert, P., Elger, B. S., & Bertrand, D. (2004). Le jeûne de protestation : un défi inhabituel pour le médecin. Médecine & Hygiène, 62(2508), 2485–2489.
Walmsley, R. (2013). World prison population list (10th ed.). London: International Center for Prison Studies. www.prisonstudies.org
Wangmo, T., Handtke, V., & Elger, B. S. (2014). Disclosure of past crimes: An analysis of mental health professionals’ attitudes toward breaching confidentiality. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 11(3), 347–358.
Wilper, A. P., Woolhandler, S. J., Boyd, W., Lasser, K. E., McCormick, D., Bor, D. H., & Himmelstein, D. U. (2009). The health and health care of US prisoners: Results of a nationwide survey. American Journal of Public Health, 99(4), 666–672.
Further Readings
Fazel, S., & Baillargeon, J. (2011). The health of prisoners. Lancet, 377, 956–965.
International Dual Loyalty Working Group. (2002). Dual loyalty & human rights in health professional practice; proposed guidelines & institutional mechanisms. Boston: Physicians for Human Rights and the School of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. https://s3.amazonaws.com/PHR_Reports/dualloyalties2002-report.pdf.
Jotterand, F., & Wangmo, T. (2014). The principle of equivalence reconsidered: Assessing the relevance of the principle of equivalence in prison medicine. American Journal of Bioethics, 14(7), 4–12.
Konrad, N. (2010). Ethical issues in forensic psychiatry in penal and other correctional facilities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 23(5), 467.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Wangmo, T., Elger, B.S. (2015). Prisoners. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_349-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_349-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities