Abstract
This chapter considers nanotechnology innovation, particularly in the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in the USA, and the emergence in the NNI of fundamental unifying societal and ethical ideas that provide a basis for approaches to other emerging (and convergent) technologies. In it I employ the term “societal science” to reference these ideas and practices that emerge from the nanotechnology case and have the potential to enable the essential goal of converging technologies – that of harmonizing science and society. The chapter begins with my candidate list of the core societal implications that have emerged across the very broad sweep of nanotechnology applications. I then take up in turn each of the five basic principles for convergence cited by Roco, Bainbridge, Tonn, and Whitesides in the CKTS report (Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London, 2013) in relation to what we have learned about societal and ethical implications of nanotechnologies. What follows is a brief assessment of the question of how much nanotechnologies’ “societal science” can generalize to other emergent technologies and also scale up in convergence. The larger purpose of this piece thus is to consider how applicable what we have learned from the case of nanotechnology in society will be to fulfilling the fundamental goal of CKTS, defined as “transformative actions to improve societal outcomes.”
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barben D, Fisher E, Selin C, Guston DH (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement and integration. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch ME, Wajcman J (eds) The new handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 979–1000
Beaudrie CEH, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Harthorn BH (2013) Expert Views on Regulatory Preparedness for Managing the Risks of Nanotechnologies. PLoS ONE 8(11): e80250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080250
Collins H, Evans R, Gorman ME (2010) Chapter 2, Trading zones and interactional expertise. In: Gorman M (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 7–25
Corner A, Pidgeon N (2012) Nanotechnologies and upstream public engagement: dilemmas, debates, and prospects. In: Harthorn BH, Mohr J (eds) The social life of nanotechnology. Routledge, New York/London, pp 169–194
Dietz T, Stern PC (eds) (2008) Public participation in environmental assessment and decision making. National Research Council/The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
Fischhoff B (1995) Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of progress. Risk Anal 15(2):137–145
Gorman M (ed) (2010) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Gregory R, Lichtenstein S, Slovic P (1993) Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J Risk Uncertain 7:177–197
Harthorn BH, Mohr JM (eds) (2012) The social life of nanotechnology. Routledge, New York/London
Hays SA, Robert JS, Miller CA, Bennett I (eds) (2013) Nanotechnology, the brain, and the future. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London
Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York
Mody CCM (2011) Instrumental community: probe microscopy and the path to nanotechnology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) (2013) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, Chichester
Parker R, Appelbaum RP (eds) (2012) Emerging economies, emerging technologies: can technology make a difference in development? Routledge, London
Parkhill K, Pidgeon NF, Corner AJ, Vaughan N (2013) Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In: Owen R, Bessant J, Heintz M (eds) Responsible innovation: managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. Wiley, London, pp 219–240
Perrow C (1999) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Pidgeon NF, Rogers-Hayden T (2007) Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? Health Risk Soc 9:191–210
Pidgeon NF, Harthorn B, Bryant K, Rogers-Hayden T (2009) Deliberating the risks of nanotechnology for energy and health applications in the US and UK. Nat Nanotechnol 4:95–98
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2010) Report to the President and Congress on the Third Assessment of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-nni-report.pdf
Roco MC, Bainbridge WS, Tonn B, Whitesides G (eds) (2013) Convergence of knowledge, technology and society: beyond convergence of nano-bio-info-cognitive technologies. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London
Satterfield T, Gregory R, Klain S, Roberts M, Chan K (2013) Culture, intangibles and metrics in environmental management. J Environ Manage 117:103–114
Slovic P (ed) (2000) The perception of risk. Earthscan, London
Stern PC, Fineberg HV (eds) (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. National Academies Press/National Research Council, Washington, DC
Van den Hoven J, Doorn N, Swierstra T, Koops B-J, Romijn H (eds) (2014) Responsible innovation 1: innovative solutions for global issues. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Harthorn, B.H. (2015). Unifying Ethical Concepts. In: Bainbridge, W., Roco, M. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_54-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04033-2_54-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04033-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Computer SciencesReference Module Computer Science and Engineering