Skip to main content

Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a highly prevalent disorder, which decreases the quality of life of women significantly. As a result of an aging population, the prevalence of women with POP will increase notably from 3.3 million to 4.9 million over the next 40 years. Surgical treatment of vaginal apical prolapse can be achieved through a variety of vaginal or abdominal approaches. Abdominal sacral colpopexy is a well-accepted and durable repair for apical vaginal prolapse and considered the procedure of choice as symptoms of the vault prolapse are relieved and the vaginal function is maintained or restored with minimal changes to the vaginal anatomy and function. Intraoperative and perioperative complications are uncommon in the open colpopexy procedure. When comparing open sacrocolpopexy versus minimally invasive approaches, both groups demonstrated similar vaginal support and functional short-term results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(3):609–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181985312.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu JM, Vaughan CP, Goode PS, et al. Prevalence and trends of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:141–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fialkow MF, Newton KM, Lentz GM, et al. Lifetime risk of surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19:437–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1278–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirby A, Luber K, Menefee S. An update on the current and future demand for care of pelvic floor disorders in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(6):584.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.09.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse, July 2011 [Internet]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/81123/download

  7. Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Fine P, Nygaard I, Richter H, Visco A, et al. A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24(5):629–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Visco A, Weber AM, Cundiff GW, et al. Two-year outcomes after sacrocolpopexy with and without Burch to prevent stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(1):49–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Visco AG, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Richter HE, Cundiff G, Fine P, Pelvic Floor Disorders Network, et al. The role of preoperative urodynamic testing in stress-continent women undergoing sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(5):607–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boyles SH, Weber AM, Meyn L. Procedures for pelvic organ pro- lapse in the United States, 1979–1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188(1):108–15. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Given FT Jr, Muhlendorf IK, Browning GM. Vaginal length and sexual function after colpopexy for complete uterovaginal eversion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:284–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carey MP, Slack MC. Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994;101:536–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sauer H, Klutke C. Transvaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 1995;154:1008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubacker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:804–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hsu I, Chen L, Summers A, et al. Anterior vaginal wall length and degree of anterior compartment prolapseseen on dynamic MRI. Int Urogynencol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008;19(1):137–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Arthure HG. Vault suspension. Proc R Soc Med. 1949;42:388–90.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Arthure HG, Savage D. Uterine prolapse and prolapse of the vaginal vault treated by sacral hysteropexy. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1957;64:355–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1962;20:72–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Birnbaum SJ. Rational therapy for the prolapsed vagina. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115:411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Feldman GB, Birnbaum SJ. Sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53:399.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sutton GP, Addison WA, Livengood CH 3rd, Hammond CB. Life-threatening hemorrhage complicating sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;140:836–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Addison WA, Livengood CH 3rd, Sutton GP, Parker RT. Abdominal sacral colpopexy with Mersilene mesh in the retroperitoneal position in the management of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;153:140–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Snyder TE, Krantz KE. Abdominal-retroperitoneal sacral colpopexy for the correction of vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:944–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Addison WA, Timmons MC, Wall LL, Livengood CH 3rd. Failed abdominal sacral colpopexy: observations and recommendations. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:480–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Addison WA, Cundiff GW, Bump RC, Harris RL. Sacral colpopexy is the preferred treatment for vaginal vault prolapse. J Gynecol Technol. 1996;2:69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anger T, Mueller R, Tarnay R, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(1):5–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000006.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Collins SA, Tulikangas PK, O’Sullivan DM. Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy. (Report). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(5):438.e1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shepherd JP, Higdon HL 3rd, Stanford EJ, Mattox TF. Effect of suture selection on the rate of suture or mesh erosion and surgery failure in abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2010;16:229–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Khan A, Alperin M, Wu N, et al. Comparative outcomes of open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy among medicare beneficiaries. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(11):1883–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2088-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Weidner AC, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Addison WA. Sacral osteomyelitis: an unusual complication of abdominal sacral colpopexy. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(4 Pt 2):689–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(97)00306-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arbel R, Lavy Y. Vaginal vault prolapse: choice of operation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19(6):959–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.08.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. McDermott C, Park J, Terry C, Woodman P, Hale D. Laparoscopic sacral colpoperineopexy: abdominal versus abdominal–vaginal posterior graft attachment. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(4):469–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1302-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nezhat C. Laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:885–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology (Ridgewood, NJ). 2004;63(2):373–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2003.09.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carlisle J, Swart M, Dawe EJ, Chadwick M. Factors associated with survival after resection of colorectal adenocarcinoma in 314 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108:430–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Haya N, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Perioperative interventions in pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(8):CD013105.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nygaard I, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309:2016–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Chapple CR, Cruz F, Deffieux X, et al. Consensus statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the use of implanted materials for treating pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72:424–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Amid PK. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia. 1997;1:15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Winters JC, Krlin RM, Hallner B. Vaginal and abdominal reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. In: Campbell- Walsh-Wein urology. 12th ed. Philadelphia, USA: Elsevier; 2020. p. 2776–829.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Fox S, Stanton S. Vault prolapse and rectocele: assessment of repair using sacrocolpopexy with mesh interposition. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;107:1371–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Virtanen H, Hirvonen T, Makinen J, Kiilholma P. Outcome of thirty patients who underwent repair of post-hysterectomy prolapse of the vaginal vault with abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;178:283–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Fine P, et al. A randomized trial of colpopexy and urinary reduction efforts (CARE): design and methods. Control Clin Trials. 2003;24:629–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hudson CO, Northington GM, Lyles RH, et al. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2014;20:252–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, et al. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2014;66:303–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1005–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Chan SSC, Pang SMW, Cheung TH, et al. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17:54–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Blanchard KA, Vanlangendonck RM, Winters JC. Recurrent pelvic floor defects after abdominal sacral colpopexy. J Urol. 2006;175:1010–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kelleher CJ, Cardozo LD, Khullar V, Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;104:1374–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lobel RW, Sand PK. Long-term results of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Neurourol Urodyn. 1996;4:398–9.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Read CB, Vidakovic B. Encyclopedia of statistical sciences. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Kirkpatrick LA, Feeney BC. A simple guide to IBM SPSS statistics for version 20.0. Student ed. Belmont: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Benson JT, Lucente V, McClellan E. Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term out- come evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418–21. [discussion 1421–2].

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Podratz K, Ferguson L, Hoverman V, et al. Abdominal sacral colpopexy for posthysterectomy vaginal vault descensus. J Pelvic Surg. 1995;1:18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Timmons MC, Kohler MF, Addison WA. Thumbtack use for control of presacral bleeding with description of an instrument for thumbtack application. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:313–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Addison WA, Livengood CH, Parker RT. Vaginal vault prolapse with emphasis on management by transabdominal sacral colpopexy. Postgrad Obstet Gynecol. 1998;8:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, Haya N, Brown J. Surgery for women with apical vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(10):Art. No.: CD012376. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012376. Accessed 01 May 2022.

  59. Mowat A, Maher C, Ballard E. Surgical outcomes for low-volume vs high-volume surgeons in gynecology surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Toomey P, Teta A, Patel K, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. High-volume surgeons vs high-volume hospitals: are best outcomes more due to who or where? Am J Surg. 2016;211(1):59–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ferronha, F., Riquelme, J.B., Martins, F.E. (2023). Open Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy. In: Martins, F.E., Holm, H.V., Sandhu, J.S., McCammon, K.A. (eds) Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19597-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19598-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics