Skip to main content

Voiding Dysfunction After Female Pelvic Surgery

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction

Abstract

Pelvic surgery can result in voiding dysfunction. Neuropathic inadvertent iatrogenic trauma to the pelvic plexus occurs most often after radical gynecological and colorectal surgeries. In benign conditions, transvaginal and abdominal retropubic surgery performed for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence lead to voiding dysfunction because of anatomic changes and overcorrections. In the latter categories, bladder outlet obstruction remains the most prevalent cause of voiding dysfunction, rather than neuropathy. Long-standing bladder outlet obstruction can lead to overactive bladder or even myopathic detrusor failure. Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse can lead to outcomes in voiding behaviors with urinary retention, overactive bladder, and stress urinary incontinence.

In this chapter, we describe the surgical anatomy of the pelvic nervous system and the pelvic floor and discuss the pathophysiology and evaluation of voiding dysfunction after pelvic surgery, including surgery for stress urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, endometriosis, hysterectomy, and colorectal surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 649.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Groat WC, Yoshimura N. Anatomy and physiology of the lower urinary tract. Handb Clin Neurol. 2015;130:61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson KE. Pharmacology of lower urinary tract smooth muscles and penile erectile tissues. Pharmacol Rev. 1993;45:253.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Andersson KE, Arner A. Urinary bladder contraction and relaxation: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2004;84:935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gosling J. The structure of the bladder and urethra in relation to function. Urol Clin North Am. 1979;6:31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Havenga K, DeRuiter MC, Enker WE, et al. Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;83:384.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Groat WC. Spinal cord projections and neuropeptides in visceral afferent neurons. Prog Brain Res. 1986;67:165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. de Groat WC, Griffiths D, Yoshimura N. Neural control of the lower urinary tract. Compr Physiol. 2015;5:327.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. DeLancey JO. Functional anatomy of the female lower urinary tract and pelvic floor. Ciba Found Symp. 1990;151:57.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeLancey JO. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:1713.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Westby M, Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. Location of maximum intraurethral pressure related to urogenital diaphragm in the female subject as studied by simultaneous urethrocystometry and voiding urethrocystography. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982;144:408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. On the physiology of continence and pathophysiology of stress incontinence in the female. Contrib Gynecol Obstet. 1983;10:32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. DeLancey JO. The hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Petros PE, Ulmsten U. I.: an integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1990;153:7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomelsky A, Nitti VW, Dmochowski RR. Management of obstructive voiding dysfunction after incontinence surgery: lessons learned. Urology. 2003;62:391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrison SC, Hunnam GR, Farman P, et al. Bladder instability and denervation in patients with bladder outflow obstruction. Br J Urol. 1987;60:519.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Speakman MJ, Brading AF, Gilpin CJ, et al. Bladder outflow obstruction--a cause of denervation supersensitivity. J Urol. 1987;138:1461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cardozo LD, Stanton SL, Williams JE. Detrusor instability following surgery for genuine stress incontinence. Br J Urol. 1979;51:204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel BN, Kobashi KC, Staskin D. Iatrogenic obstruction after sling surgery. Nat Rev Urol. 2012;9:429.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tse V, Chan L. Outlet obstruction after sling surgery. BJU Int. 2011;108(Suppl 2):24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheung F, Sandhu JS. Voiding dysfunction after non-urologic pelvic surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tran H, Rutman M. Female outlet obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery. Urology. 2018;112:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Murray S, Lemack GE. Defining the role of urodynamics in predicting voiding dysfunction after anti-incontinence surgery: a work in progress. Curr Opin Urol. 2010;20:285.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sweeney DD, Leng WW. Treatment of postoperative voiding dysfunction following incontinence surgery. Curr Urol Rep. 2005;6:365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuire EJ, Letson W, Wang S. Transvaginal urethrolysis after obstructive urethral suspension procedures. J Urol. 1989;142:1037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nitti VW, Raz S. Obstruction following anti-incontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol. 1994;152:93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cross CA, Cespedes RD, English SF, et al. Transvaginal urethrolysis for urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery. J Urol. 1998;159:1199.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL, et al. Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 2003;169:2234.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Duckett JR, Basu M. The predictive value of preoperative pressure-flow studies in the resolution of detrusor overactivity and overactive bladder after tension-free vaginal tape insertion. BJU Int. 2007;99:1439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Panayi DC, Duckett J, Digesu GA, et al. Pre-operative opening detrusor pressure is predictive of detrusor overactivity following TVT in patients with pre-operative mixed urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Liang CC, Hsieh WC, Lin YH, et al. Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity in women with pelvic organ prolapse following transvaginal mesh repair. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016;42:427.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Artman LE, Hoskins WJ, Bibro MC, et al. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB carcinoma of the cervix: 21 years experience. Gynecol Oncol. 1987;28:8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mundy AR. An anatomical explanation for bladder dysfunction following rectal and uterine surgery. Br J Urol. 1982;54:501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Roovers JP, van der Bom JG, Huub van der Vaart C, et al. Does mode of hysterectomy influence micturition and defecation? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:945.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Everaert K, De Muynck M, Rimbaut S, et al. Urinary retention after hysterectomy for benign disease: extended diagnostic evaluation and treatment with sacral nerve stimulation. BJU Int. 2003;91:497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wyndaele JJ. Is abnormal electrosensitivity in the lower urinary tract a sign of neuropathy? Br J Urol. 1993;72:575.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weber AM, Walters MD, Schover LR, et al. Functional outcomes and satisfaction after abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chuang TY, Yu KJ, Penn IW, et al. Neurourological changes before and after radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82:954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin LY, Wu JH, Yang CW, et al. Impact of radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer on urodynamic findings. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2004;15:418.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, et al. Immediate Foley removal after laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: determinants of postoperative urinary retention. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Scotti RJ, Bergman A, Bhatia NN, et al. Urodynamic changes in urethrovesical function after radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:111.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Benedetti-Panici P, Zullo MA, Plotti F, et al. Long-term bladder function in patients with locally advanced cervical carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type 3-4 radical hysterectomy. Cancer. 2004;100:2110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Laterza RM, Sievert KD, de Ridder D, et al. Bladder function after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015;34:309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen GD, Lin LY, Wang PH, et al. Urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Axelsen SM, Petersen LK. Urogynaecological dysfunction after radical hysterectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Long CY, Hsu SC, Wu TP, et al. Effect of laparoscopic hysterectomy on bladder neck and urinary symptoms. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;43:65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Virtanen H, Mäkinen J, Tenho T, et al. Effects of abdominal hysterectomy on urinary and sexual symptoms. Br J Urol. 1993;72:868.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Long CY, Jang MY, Chen SC, et al. Changes in vesicourethral function following laparoscopic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42:259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Possover M, Stöber S, Plaul K, et al. Identification and preservation of the motoric innervation of the bladder in radical hysterectomy type III. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Puntambekar SP, Patil A, Joshi SN, et al. Preservation of autonomic nerves in laparoscopic total radical hysterectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20:813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Manchana T, Prasartsakulchai C, Santingamkun A. Long-term lower urinary tract dysfunction after radical hysterectomy in patients with early postoperative voiding dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010;21:95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Forsgren C, Lundholm C, Johansson AL, et al. Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Huang HK, Ding DC. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy with benign indication: a national cohort study in Taiwan. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:1669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Dörflinger A, Monga A. Voiding dysfunction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;13:507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang A. C.: Burch colposuspension vs. Stamey bladder neck suspension. A comparison of complications with special emphasis on detrusor instability and voiding dysfunction. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:529.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Klutke JJ, Klutke CG, Bergman J, et al. Bladder neck suspension for stress urinary incontinence: how does it work? Neurourol Urodyn. 1999;18:623.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zimmern PE, Hadley HR, Leach GE, et al. Female urethral obstruction after Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz operation. J Urol. 1987;138:517.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Conrad DH, Pacquee S, Saar TD, et al. Long-term patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59:850.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Holschneider CH, Solh S, Lebherz TB, et al. The modified Pereyra procedure in recurrent stress urinary incontinence: a 15-year review. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Kjølhede P, Wahlström J, Wingren G. Pelvic floor dysfunction after Burch colposuspension--a comprehensive study. Part II Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Karram MM, Segal JL, Vassallo BJ, et al. Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:929.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Lemack GE, Krauss S, Litman H, et al. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling. J Urol. 2008;180:2076.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Romics M, Keszthelyi V, Brodszky V, et al. Narrow vagina as a predictor of obstructive voiding dysfunction after Transobturator sling surgery. Urol Int. 2021;105:1092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Yang PS, Delpe S, Kowalik CG, et al. Risk factor of De novo urgency and urge incontinence after autologous fascia Pubovaginal sling. Res Rep Urol. 2021;13:591.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Mitsui T, Tanaka H, Moriya K, et al. Clinical and urodynamic outcomes of pubovaginal sling procedure with autologous rectus fascia for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Urol. 2007;14:1076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Milose JC, Sharp KM, He C, et al. Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol. 2015;193:916.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Virseda-Chamorro M, Salinas-Casado J, Tapia-Herrero AM, et al. Effect of pelvic organ prolapse repair on detrusor overactivity in women following incontinence surgery: a multivariate analysis. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:2083.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Gamble TL, Botros SM, Beaumont JL, et al. Predictors of persistent detrusor overactivity after transvaginal sling procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:696.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Jonsson Funk M, Siddiqui NY, Pate V, et al. Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:73.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fong ED, Nitti VW. Review article: mid-urethral synthetic slings for female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2010;106:596.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zimmern PE, Gormley EA, Stoddard AM, et al. Management of recurrent stress urinary incontinence after Burch and sling procedures. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016;35:344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal slings, and Midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2017;72:567.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Takacs P, Medina CA. Tension-free vaginal tape: poor intraoperative cough test as a predictor of postoperative urinary retention. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2007;18:1445.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Hong B, Park S, Kim HS, et al. Factors predictive of urinary retention after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2003;170:852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Ripperda CM, Kowalski JT, Chaudhry ZQ, et al. Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:656.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Bazi T, Kerkhof MH, Takahashi SI, et al. Management of post-midurethral sling voiding dysfunction. International Urogynecological association research and development committee opinion. Int Urogynecol J. 2018;29:23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Malacarne DR, Nitti VW. Post-sling urinary retention in women. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Croak AJ, Schulte V, Peron S, et al. Transvaginal tape lysis for urinary obstruction after tension-free vaginal tape placement. J Urol. 2003;169:2238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Viereck V, Rautenberg O, Kociszewski J, et al. Midurethral sling incision: indications and outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Moksnes LR, Svenningsen R, Schiøtz HA, et al. Sling mobilization in the management of urinary retention after mid-urethral sling surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017;36:1091.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rautenberg, O., Kociszewski, J., Welter, J. et al.: Ultrasound and early tape mobilization--a practical solution for treating postoperative voiding dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn, 33: 1147, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Nitti VW, Carlson KV, Blaivas JG, et al. Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision. Urology. 2002;59:47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Thiel DD, Pettit PD, McClellan WT, et al. Long-term urinary continence rates after simple sling incision for relief of urinary retention following fascia lata pubovaginal slings. J Urol. 2005;174:1878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Celik H, Harmanlı O. Evaluation and management of voiding dysfunction after midurethral sling procedures. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2012;13:123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Leng WW, Davies BJ, Tarin T, et al. Delayed treatment of bladder outlet obstruction after sling surgery: association with irreversible bladder dysfunction. J Urol. 2004;172:1379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Oliver JL, Raz S. Suprameatal urethrolysis with Martius flap for refractory bladder outflow obstruction following stress incontinence surgery in females. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney-Geany S, et al. How to use the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system? Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:S39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, et al. Pelvic organ support study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Durnea CM, Khashan AS, Kenny LC, et al. Prevalence, etiology and risk factors of pelvic organ prolapse in premenopausal primiparous women. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:1463.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Samuelsson EC, Victor FT, Tibblin G, et al. Signs of genital prolapse in a Swedish population of women 20 to 59 years of age and possible related factors. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;180:299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Maher, C., Feiner, B., Baessler, K. et al.: Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: Cd004014, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Fitzgerald MP, Kulkarni N, Fenner D. Postoperative resolution of urinary retention in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:1361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Chen A, McIntyre B, De EJB. Management of Postoperative Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) after pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair. Curr Urol Rep. 2018;19:74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Theofrastous JP, Addison WA, Timmons M. C.: voiding function following prolapse surgery. Impact of estrogen replacement. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:881.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Valtersson E, Husby KR, Elmelund M, et al. Evaluation of suture material used in anterior colporrhaphy and the risk of recurrence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:2011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Ahmed AA, Abdellatif AH, El-Helaly HA, et al. Concomitant transobturator tape and anterior colporrhaphy versus transobturator subvesical mesh for cystocele-associated stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:1633.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Balzarro M, Rubilotta E, Porcaro AB, et al. Long-term follow-up of anterior vaginal repair: a comparison among colporrhaphy, colporrhaphy with reinforcement by xenograft, and mesh. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Lakeman MM, Hakvoort RA, Van de Weijer EP, et al. Anterior colporrhaphy does not induce bladder outlet obstruction. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23:723.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial. BMJ. 2019;366:l5149.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, et al. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022;227:252.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, et al. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial. BMJ. 2015;351:h3717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Detollenaere RJ, Kreuwel IA, Dijkstra JR, et al. The impact of sacrospinous Hysteropexy and vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments on sexual function in women with uterine prolapse: a secondary analysis of a randomized comparative study. J Sex Med. 2016;13:213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, et al. Effect of uterosacral ligament suspension vs sacrospinous ligament fixation with or without perioperative behavioral therapy for pelvic organ vaginal prolapse on surgical outcomes and prolapse symptoms at 5 years in the OPTIMAL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319:1554.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Chen Y, Peng L, Zhang J, et al. Sacrospinous ligament fixation vs uterosacral ligaments suspension for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urology. 2022;166:133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Cespedes RD. Anterior approach bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2000;56:70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Solomon ER, St Marie P, Jones KA, et al. Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation: a safe route for apical repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020;26:e33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Lo TS, Shailaja N, Hsieh WC, et al. Predictors of voiding dysfunction following extensive vaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28:575.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. El Haraki AS, Burns J, Crafton CL, et al. Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: a retrospective cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2021;1

    Google Scholar 

  108. Berger AA, Tan-Kim J, Menefee SA. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225:552.e1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Eto C, Ford AT, Smith M, et al. Retrospective cohort study on the perioperative risk factors for transient voiding dysfunction after apical prolapse repair. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25:167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Yune JJ, Cheng JW, Wagner H, et al. Postoperative urinary retention after pelvic organ prolapse repair: vaginal versus robotic transabdominal approach. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:1794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Yadav M, Patel K, Turrentine MA, et al. Postoperative pain and urinary retention after vaginal reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021;27:e497.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Turner LC, Kantartzis K, Shepherd JP. Predictors of postoperative acute urinary retention in women undergoing minimally invasive sacral colpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015;21:39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Grimes CL, Schimpf MO, Wieslander CK, et al. Surgical interventions for posterior compartment prolapse and obstructed defecation symptoms: a systematic review with clinical practice recommendations. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:1433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Dubernard G, Rouzier R, David-Montefiore E, et al. Urinary complications after surgery for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis are related to the extent of dissection and to uterosacral ligaments resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, et al. Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Vesale E, Roman H, Moawad G, et al. Voiding dysfunction after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27:1490.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Imboden S, Bollinger Y, Härmä K, et al. Predictive factors for voiding dysfunction after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28:1544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Spagnolo E, Zannoni L, Raimondo D, et al. Urodynamic evaluation and anorectal manometry pre- and post-operative bowel shaving surgical procedure for posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: a pilot study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21:1080.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Bonneau C, Zilberman S, Ballester M, et al. Incidence of pre- and postoperative urinary dysfunction associated with deep infiltrating endometriosis: relevance of urodynamic tests and therapeutic implications. Minerva Ginecol. 2013;65:385.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Benoit L, Dabi Y, Bazot M, et al. Parametrial endometriosis: a predictive and prognostic factor for voiding dysfunction and complications. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022;276:236.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Deffieux X, Raibaut P, Hubeaux K, et al. Voiding dysfunction after surgical resection of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: pathophysiology and management. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007;35(Suppl 1):S8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Kristensen MH, Elfeki H, Sinimäki S, et al. Urinary dysfunction after colorectal cancer treatment and impact on quality of life-a national cross-sectional study in males. Color Dis. 2021;23:394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  123. Ledebo A, Bock D, Prytz M, et al. Urogenital function 3 years after abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer. Color Dis. 2018;20:O123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Burgos FJ, Romero J, Fernandez E, et al. Risk factors for developing voiding dysfunction after abdominoperineal resection for adenocarcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:682.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Chang PL, Fan HA. Urodynamic studies before and/or after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum for carcinoma. J Urol. 1983;130:948.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Matsuoka H, Masaki T, Sugiyama M, et al. Impact of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection on evacuatory and urinary functions following low anterior resection for advanced rectal carcinoma. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2005;390:517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Bulfone G, Del Negro F, Del Medico E, et al. Rehabilitation strategies for low anterior resection syndrome. A systematic review, vol. 56. Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2020. p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Keane C, Wells C, O'Grady G, et al. Defining low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review of the literature. Color Dis. 2017;19:713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  129. Altomare DF, Picciariello A, Ferrara C, et al. Short-term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for low anterior resection syndrome: results of a pilot study. Color Dis. 2017;19:851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Razdan, S., Gousse, A.E. (2023). Voiding Dysfunction After Female Pelvic Surgery. In: Martins, F.E., Holm, H.V., Sandhu, J.S., McCammon, K.A. (eds) Female Genitourinary and Pelvic Floor Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19598-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-19597-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-19598-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics